Corticosteroid regulation of Na+ and K+ transport in the rat distal colon during postnatal development

To study the role of corticosteroids in the regulation of colonic electrogenic amiloride-sensitive Na+ absorption (ISCNa) and barium-sensitive K+ secretion (ISCK) during development, we investigated suckling (10-day old), weanling (25-day old) and adult (90-day old) adrenalectomized rats after they had received aldosterone, dexamethasone or corticosterone. Adrenalectomy reduced markedly ISCNa in suckling rats and completely inhibited ISCNa in weanling animals; the ISCNa was absent in intact adult rats. The doses of aldosterone, corticosterone and dexamethasone estimated to be equivalent to the endogenous production rate of aldosterone and corticosterone restored ISCNa after 1 day in both suckling and weanling rats. Compared with aldosterone, glucocorticoids produced a greater increase in ISCNa. Concurrent spironolactone treatment (a mineralocorticoid antagonist) completely prevented the effect of aldosterone but had no effect in dexamethasone-treated rats. The glucocorticoid antagonist RU 38 486 inhibited the dexamethasone-induction of ISCNa but had no effect on aldosterone. The response to corticosteroids, measured as the increase of ISCNa, declined from suckling to adult rats. In contrast to ISCNa, the same time of treatment and the same doses of corticosteroids did not influence ISCK. ISCK was stimulated only after chronic treatment (4 days). These findings suggest that, in the distal colon of young rats, (1) both corticosteroids may regulate amiloride-sensitive Na+ absorption and barium-sensitive K+ secretion, (2) different receptors mediate the colonic effects of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids, (3) immature rats are more sensitive to corticosteroids than adult animals, and (4) the acute effect of corticosteroids is an increase in Na+ absorption which is followed by delayed stimulation of K+ secretion.     

Azathioprine in Treatment of Bullous Pemphigoid

Azathioprine was given to 11 patients with pemphigoid who had been on long-term maintenance therapy with prednisone or prednisolone. In nine of these prednisone therapy was withdrawn and all were maintained symptom-free on azathioprine alone, while in two the dose of prednisone was considerably reduced. One patient who had never received corticosteroids was controlled by azathioprine alone during the initial acute phase of the illness. Since azathioprine acts slowly, it is recommended that corticosteroids should be used together with azathioprine during the acute stage. Thus azathioprine is valuable in long-term management of pemphigoid, particularly in patients showing corticosteroid toxicity or in whom the minimum maintenance dose is dangerously high.     

Corticosteroids in acute traumatic brain injury: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effectiveness and safety of corticosteroids in the treatment of acute traumatic brain injury. DESIGN: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of corticosteroids in acute traumatic brain injury. Summary odds ratios were estimated as an inverse variance weighted average of the odds ratios for each study. SETTING: Randomised trials available by March 1996. SUBJECTS: The included trials with outcome data comprised 2073 randomised participants. RESULTS: The effect of corticosteroids on the risk of death was reported in 13 included trials. The pooled odds ratio for the 13 trials was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.74 to 1.12). Pooled absolute risk reduction was 1.8% (-2.5% to 5.7%). For the 10 trials that reported death or disability the pooled odds ratio was 0.90 (0.72 to 1.11). For infections of any type the pooled odds ratio was 0.92 (0.69 to 1.23) and for the seven trials reporting gastrointestinal bleeding it was 1.05 (0.44 to 2.52). With only those trials with the best quality of concealment of allocation, the pooled odds ratio estimates for death and death or disability became closer to unity. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review of randomised controlled trials of corticosteroids in acute traumatic brain injury shows that there remains considerable uncertainty over their effects. Neither moderate benefits nor moderate harmful effects can be excluded. The widely practicable nature of the drugs and the importance of the health problem suggest that large simple trials are feasible and worth while to establish whether there are any benefits from use of corticosteroids in this setting.     

Current Concepts in Dermatology: III. The Use of Radiotherapy and Corticosteroids

The use of ionizing radiation and corticosteroids is discussed, in this third and final part of a review of diseases of the skin. Radiation is being used less extensively because superior methods of treatment are available for many conditions which formerly were frequently treated by this modality. The concept of applying the radiation at the level of the basic pathologic process has been developed into clinical practice by the use of generators which can produce very soft (or superficial) ionizing radiation. Topical or systemic corticosteroids do not cure skin diseases but produce dramatic suppression of signs and symptoms. For best results consideration must be given to the diagnosis, the natural history of the disease to be treated, the method of administration and a search for possible contraindications to the use of these steroids. Basic dermatological principles (removal of offending agents, bland soothing applications, sedation, etc.) must be adhered to. The corticosteroids are not a panacea in the treatment of skin disease.     

Systemic Agents in the Management of Acne

Topical therapy including incision of pustules and injection of corticosteroids into nodular and cystic lesions remains the mainstay of the management of acne.Systemic agents, including diuretics, corticosteroids, broad spectrum antibiotics and progestin-estrogen combinations are significant and valuable additions to the therapy of resistant pustulocystic acne. They are, however, not without side effects and they should be reserved for carefully selected patients for whom they may, when used with discretion, produce gratifying results with relatively low risk.     

Corticosteroids: the mainstay in asthma therapy

Inflammation is now marked as a central feature of asthma pathophysiology and aims of current asthma management are not only to treat acute symptoms of wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness, cough but also to suppress the underlying inflammatory component. Despite the availability of a number of drugs, corticosteroids remain the mainstay in the management of all types of asthma as these are the most potent and effective antiinflammatory agents available so far. Corticosteroids suppress virtually every step in inflammation. However therapeutic doses of oral glucocorticoids are associated with a range of adverse reactions. To overcome these side effects, inhalations have been developed to deliver glucocorticoids directly to the lungs and in the process a number of aerosol preparations have become available, which have advantage of significantly lower toxicity due to low systemic absorption from the respiratory tract and rapid inactivation. Despite considerable efforts by pharmaceutical industry, it has been difficult to develop novel therapeutic agents for asthma management, which could surpass inhaled corticosteroids. Currently the data favours using inhaled corticosteroids as monotherapy in the majority of patients in all kinds of asthma. If combination therapy is recommended to achieve additional control in severe asthma cases, other drugs such as beta-agonists, antileukotrienes, theophylline, etc. are considered as adjunct therapies to corticosteroids. This review discusses the importance of corticosteroids as first line therapy for asthma treatment with the availability of inhaled corticosteroids for chronic treatment and oral formulations for treating acute exacerbations of moderate to severe asthma.     

Sliding-Scale versus Basal-Bolus Insulin in the Management of Severe or Acute Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Retrospective Study

Sliding-scale and basal-bolus insulin regimens are two options available for the treatment of severe or acute hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Although its use is not recommended, sliding-scale insulin therapy is still being used widely. The aims of the study were to compare the glycemic control achieved by using sliding-scale or basal-bolus regimens for the management of severe or acute hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes and to analyze factors associated with the types of insulin therapy used in the management of severe or acute hyperglycemia. This retrospective study was conducted using the medical records of patients with acute or severe hyperglycemia admitted to a hospital in Malaysia from January 2008 to December 2012. A total of 202 patients and 247 admissions were included. Patients treated with the basal-bolus insulin regimen attained lower fasting blood glucose (10.8±2.3 versus 11.6±3.5 mmol/L; p = 0.028) and mean glucose levels throughout severe/acute hyperglycemia (12.3±1.9 versus 12.8±2.2; p = 0.021) compared with sliding-scale insulin regimens. Diabetic ketoacidosis (p = 0.043), cardiovascular diseases (p = 0.005), acute exacerbation of bronchial asthma (p = 0.010), and the use of corticosteroids (p = 0.037) and loop diuretics (p = 0.016) were significantly associated with the type of insulin regimen used. In conclusion, type 2 diabetes patients with severe and acute hyperglycemia achieved better glycemic control with the basal-bolus regimen than with sliding-scale insulin, and factors associated with the insulin regimen used could be identified.     

Increased Risk of Acute Pancreatitis in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Population-Based Cohort Study

The study was conducted to determine whether patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at increased risk of acute pancreatitis compared with those without RA and to determine if the risk of acute pancreatitis varied by anti-RA drug use. We used the large population-based dataset from the National Health Insurance (NHI) program in Taiwan to conduct a retrospective cohort study. Patients newly diagnosed with RA between 2000 and 2011 were referred to as the RA group. The comparator non-RA group was matched with propensity score, using age and sex, in the same time period. We presented the incidence density by 100,000 person-years. The propensity score and all variables were analyzed in fully adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression. The cumulative incidence of acute pancreatitis was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, with significance based on the log-rank test. From claims data of one million enrollees randomly sampled from the Taiwan NHI database, 29,755 adults with RA were identified and 119,020 non- RA persons were matched as a comparison group. The RA cohort had higher incidence density of acute pancreatitis (185.7 versus 119.0 per 100,000 person-years) than the non-RA cohort. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.62 (95% CI [confidence interval] 1.43–1.83) for patients with RA to develop acute pancreatitis. Oral corticosteroid use decreased the risk of acute pancreatitis (adjusted HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73–0.94) but without a dose-dependent effect. Current use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs or tumor necrosis factor blockers did not decrease the risk of acute pancreatitis. In conclusion, patients with RA are at an elevated risk of acute pancreatitis. Use of oral corticosteroids may reduce the risk of acute pancreatitis.     

Antileukotriene agents in asthma: The dart that kills the elephant?

THE PERSISTENCE OF AIRWAY INFLAMMATION is believed to cause the mechanical changes and symptoms of asthma. After decades of research, a new class of medication has emerged that focuses on leukotrienes, mediators of inflammation. These substances are potent inducers of bronchoconstriction, increased vascular permeability and mucus production, and they potentiate the influx of inflammatory cells in the airways of patients with asthma. In this article the author reviews the development, mechanism of action, and clinical and toxic effects of the leukotriene synthesis inhibitors and receptor antagonists that are entering the North American market. These agents can decrease airway response to antigen, airway hyperresponsiveness and exercise-induced asthma. They are also effective inhibitors of ASA-induced symptoms. Although few published studies are available, the antileukotrienes seem almost as effective in the management of chronic asthma as low-dose inhaled corticosteroids, and their use permits a decrease in the frequency of use or dose of corticosteroids. Further evaluation and clinical experience will determine the position of targeted inhibition of the leukotriene pathway in the treatment of asthma.     

NONSPECIFIC ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS—Some Notes on Their Practical Application,Especially in Rheumatic Disorders

A number of acute and chronic inflammatory disorders are amenable to varying degrees of therapeutic control with the administration of nonspecific anti-inflammatory drugs. An evaluation of these suppressive agents in the field of rheumatic diseases and practical suggestions regarding their administration are presented.Eight synthetically modified corticosteroid compounds are available commercially. Each of them exhibits qualitative differences in one or several physiologic actions, each has certain advantages and disadvantages in therapy, and each shares the major deterrent features of corticosteroids. Prednisone, prednisolone, methylprednisolone, fluprednisolone and paramethasone have similar therapeutic indices, and there is little choice between them for the usual rheumatoid patient requiring steroid therapy. Conversely, the therapeutic indices of dexamethasone, betamethasone and triamcinolone are lower than that of prednisolone; they are less desirable for routine use and should be reserved for specially selected cases.Salicylates are preferred to adrenocortical steroids in the treatment of the ordinary patient with acute rheumatic fever. Steroid therapy should be reserved for resistant cases and for those with significant carditis. Salicylates are mainstays for pain relief in rheumatoid arthritis, but with the analgesic doses usually employed their anti-inflammatory action is slight.Phenylbutazone is a highly useful anti-inflammatory agent, especially in management of acute gouty arthritis and ankylosing (rheumatoid) spondylitis; its metabolite, oxyphenylbutazone, does not exhibit clear-cut advantages.Colchicine specifically suppresses acute gouty arthritis. Its analogues, desacetylcolchicine and desacetylthiocolchicine, produce fewer unpleasant gastrointestinal symptoms, but may promote agranulocytosis and alopecia.A number of indole preparations with anti-inflammatory activity have been tested clinically. One of them, indomethacin, has received extensive therapeutic trial; with dosages that can be tolerated the drug is fairly effective in the symptomatic control of ankylosing (rheumatoid) spondylitis but it is of questionable value in peripheral rheumatoid arthritis.     

Risk Factors for Asthma-Related Healthcare Use: Longitudinal Analysis Using the NHI Claims Database in a Korean Asthma Cohort

Background

Though insurance claims data are useful for researching asthma, they have important limitations, such as a diagnostic inaccuracy and a lack of clinical information. To overcome these drawbacks, we used the novel method by merging the clinical data from our asthma cohort with the National Health Insurance (NHI) claims data.

Methods and Results

Longitudinal analysis of asthma-related healthcare use from the NHI claims database, merged with data of 736 patients registered in a Korean asthma cohort, was conducted for three consecutive years from registration of the cohort. Asthma-related asthma healthcare referred to outpatient and emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and the use of systemic corticosteroids. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors for asthma-related healthcare. Over three years after enrollment, many patients changed from tertiary to primary/secondary hospitals with a lack of maintenance of inhaled corticosteroid-based controllers. An independent risk factor for emergency visits was a previous history of asthma exacerbation. In hospitalizations, old age and Asthma Control Test (ACT) score variability were independent risk factors. An independent risk factor for per person cumulative duration of systemic corticosteroids was the FEV₁ (Forced expiratory volume in one second)%. The use of systemic corticosteroids was independently associated with being female, the FEV₁%, and ACT score variability.

Conclusion

We found that old age, being female, long-standing asthma, a low FEV₁%, asthma brittleness, asthma drug compliance, and a history of asthma exacerbation were independent risk factors for increased asthma-related healthcare use in Korea.     

The quantitative measurement of steroids secreted by isolated adrenals from sodium depleted rats

A simple, rapid and reproducible method has been developed to quantitate the principal corticosteroids secreted by isolated adrenals from sodium-depleted rats. Isooctane is used to preferentially extract DOC from the other major adrenal corticosteroids, circumventing the need for extensive and laborious paper or thin layer chromatography prior to derivatization and analysis. The technique combines the use of established fluorescence and gas-liquid chromatographic analysis and is applicable to a variety of biological samples from rats (or mice) in studies of the effects of physiological or pharmacological factors on corticosteroid secretion. Examples of the routine application of this technique are provided.     

The status of corticosteroid therapy in dermatology

Therapy with systemic corticosteroids, despite attendant serious risks, is mandatory in diseases such as pemphigus, acute disseminated lupus erythematosus and some cases of exfoliative dermatitis that are ordinarily fatal, for in such cases life may be prolonged and the patients made comfortable. If no contraindications exist, therapy with corticosteroids is desirable, for diseases of short duration-contact dermatitis, serum sickness reactions and drug eruptions of all kinds-provided the causative factors have been removed and the reactions are causing severe distress.On the basis of encouraging reports in the literature corticosteroid therapy may be instituted with justification for a group of unrelated, intractable and discomforting diseases such as maddening pruritus ani, sclerema neonatorum, dermatomyositis, certain cases of sarcoidosis, berylliosis, Behcet's syndrome, universal calcinosis, Reiter's disease and ulcers of sickle-cell anemia. One must always bear in mind the well-defined contraindications to corticosteroid therapy and the hazards of its use, particularly if therapy is to be prolonged. Results from topical hydrocortisone therapy are particularly pleasing in chronic eczematous otitis externa and especially when it is combined with an antibiotic drug. Results are excellent also in nuchal eczema, dermatitis of the eyelids and in pruritus ani. More often than not, hydrocortisone ointment and lotions benefit more than do other standard remedies such diseases as atopic eczema, contact dermatitis, lichen simplex-chronicus and eczematized phases of conditions such as psoriasis and superficial mycotic infections. Preparations containing a combination of hydrocortisone and an antibiotic are more useful than hydrocortisone alone. When used with discrimination, with full attention to the selection of cases and proper concentration in the correct vehicle, hydrocortisone preparations in combination with antibiotics are excellent antieczematous agents.     

Growth factors in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: relative roles

Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients has evolved very slowly; the fundamental approach of corticosteroids alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive agents has had little impact on long-term survival. The continued use of corticosteroids is justified because of the lack of a more effective alternative. Current research indicates that the mechanisms driving idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis reflect abnormal, dysregulated wound healing within the lung, involving increased activity and possibly exaggerated responses by a spectrum of profibrogenic growth factors. An understanding of the roles of these growth factors, and the way in which they modulate events at cellular level, could lead to more targeted therapeutic strategies, improving patients' quality of life and survival.     

Growth factors in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: relative roles

Treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients has evolved very slowly; the fundamental approach of corticosteroids alone or in combination with other immunosuppressive agents has had little impact on long-term survival. The continued use of corticosteroids is justified because of the lack of a more effective alternative. Current research indicates that the mechanisms driving idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis reflect abnormal, dysregulated wound healing within the lung, involving increased activity and possibly exaggerated responses by a spectrum of profibrogenic growth factors. An understanding of the roles of these growth factors, and the way in which they modulate events at cellular level, could lead to more targeted therapeutic strategies, improving patients' quality of life and survival.     

Fibrosing alveolitis

Fibrosing alveolitis is a disease of unknown cause mainly involving the gas-exchanging portions of the lungs. It may occur in isolation and be called cryptogenic or idiopathic, in which case the clinical manifestations are mainly respiratory, or it may be associated with other disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis. The histopathologic abnormalities of the pulmonary tissue are identical in either instance. Other names used for the disease have included usual interstitial pneumonia, desquamative interstitial pneumonia and the Hamman-Rich syndrome; these terms may describe different stages of the same pathologic process. Many authors in North America and those in the United Kingdom favour the term fibrosing alveolitis when describing chronic interstitial pneumonias. There may be accompanying nonspecific Immunologic abnormalities, which may denote that fibrosing alveolitis is part of the wide spectrum of diseases known as connective tissue disorders. Recently immune complexes have been found in the lung parenchyma; they probably result in the granulocyte destruction and reticuloendothelial proliferation seen in the acute phase of the disease.There are no specific diagnostic tests for the disease apart from lung biopsy, which can be performed at the time of thoracotomy or transbronchially, with the use of a flexible fibreoptic bronchoscope. Lavaged cells from the alveoli have also been obtained via the bronchoscope; in persons with fibrosing alveolitis a high proportion of these cells are neutrophils, and after corticosteroid treatment the proportion decreases. The progress of the disease can be followed by examination of these washings as well as by lung scanning with gallium-67 citrate. Newer methods of treatment using combinations of corticosteroids and immunosuppressant drugs are being evaluated and are initially proving to be successful.     

Prognostic value of the reaction to steroids in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children]

Relationship between the result of therapy in 48 cases of the acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood and character of response to corticosteroids, classified according to BMF group, has been assessed. Follow up period ranged from 13 to 75 months (mean 36 months, median 39 months). In was found, that the probability of survival free from any events, probability of complete remission persistence, and probability of survival after diagnosis have been statistically significantly higher in the group of patients with positive response to corticosteroids in comparison with patients non-responding to these agents. However, there was no significant difference in the number of recurrencies with the involvement of CNS. Authors share the opinion that their results confirm an opinion of Riehm et al. that the response to corticosteroids is of prognostic value in the acute lymphoblastic leukemia in childhood.     

Parenteral dexamethasone for acute severe migraine headache: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials for preventing recurrence

Objective To examine the effectiveness of parenteral corticosteroids for the relief of acute severe migraine headache and prevention of recurrent headaches.Design Meta-analysis.Data sources Electronic databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, Embase, LILACS, and CINAHL), conference proceedings, clinical practice guidelines, contacts with industry, and correspondence with authors.Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials in which corticosteroids (alone or combined with standard abortive therapy) were compared with placebo or any other standard treatment for acute migraine in adults.Review methods Two reviewers independently assessed relevance, inclusion, and study quality. Weighted mean differences and relative risks were calculated and are reported with 95% confidence intervals.Results From 666 potentially relevant abstracts, seven studies met the inclusion criteria. All included trials used standard abortive therapy and subsequently compared single dose parenteral dexamethasone with placebo, examining pain relief and recurrence of headache within 72 hours. Dexamethasone and placebo provided similar acute pain reduction (weighted mean difference 0.37, 95% confidence interval −0.20 to 0.94). Dexamethasone was, however, more effective than placebo in reducing recurrence rates (relative risk 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.90). Side effect profiles between dexamethasone and placebo groups were similar.Conclusion When added to standard abortive therapy for migraine headache, single dose parenteral dexamethasone is associated with a 26% relative reduction in headache recurrence (number needed to treat=9) within 72 hours.