Anomalous acceleration of the photocycle in photosynthetic reaction centers inhibited on the acceptor side

The rate of the photocycle (quinone reduction cycle) was measured under continuous light excitation in an isolated reaction center protein of the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The rate is determined by the slowest step of the photocycle, which could be the photochemistry (charge separation), the quinone/quinol and cytochrome c(2+)/c(3+) exchanges, or proton delivery to the secondary quinone. The photocycle was driven by high light intensity of a laser diode (5 W/cm(2) at 808 nm) to avoid light limitation of the observed rate. The fast turnover of the reaction center (up to 10(3) s(-1)) was slowed down by inhibition of the proton delivery to the secondary quinone by transition metal ions (Cd(2+) and Ni(2+)), by mutation of a key protonatable group (L213Asp --> Asn), or by use of low-affinity ubiquinone (UQ(0)) to the secondary quinone binding site. Although in all of these cases the rate of turnover was 2-3 orders of magnitude less than that of the primary photochemistry, marked light intensity dependence was observed. The rate of the photocycle increased from 7 s(-1) (Ni(2+), low light intensity) to 27 s(-1) (high light intensity) at pH 8.4. The anomalous reacceleration is due to alternative events on the acceptor side induced by continuous excitation. We argue that the continuous excitation of the protein trapped in the reduced acceptor (Q(A)(-)Q(B)(-)) state produces short-lived reduced bacteriopheophytin (I(-)) that delivers activation energy to anomalous changes on the acceptor side as second interquinone electron transfer before proton uptake or increase of the quinone dissociation constant.     

Uncoupling of electron and proton transfers in the photocycle of bacterial reaction centers under high light intensity

Photosynthetic reaction centers produce and export oxidizing and reducing equivalents in expense of absorbed light energy. The formation of fully reduced quinone (quinol) requires a strict (1:1) stoichiometric ratio between the electrons and H(+) ions entering the protein. The steady-state rates of both transports were measured separately under continuous illumination in the reaction center from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. The uptake of the first proton was retarded by different methods and made the rate-limiting reaction in the photocycle. As expected, the rate constant of the observed proton binding remained constant (7 s(-)(1)), but that of the cytochrome photooxidation did show a remarkably large increase from 14 to 136 s(-)(1) upon increase of the exciting light intensity up to 5 W/cm(2) (808 nm) at pH 8.4 in the presence of NiCl(2). This corresponds to about 20:1 (e(-):H(+)) stoichiometric ratio. The observed enhancement is linearly proportional to the light intensity and the rate constant of the proton uptake by the acceptor complex and shows saturation character with quinone availability. For interpretation of the acceleration of cytochrome turnover, an extended model of the photocycle is proposed. A fraction of photochemically trapped RC can undergo fast (>10(3) s(-)(1)) conformational change where the semiquinone loses its high binding affinity (the dissociation constant increases by more than 5 orders of magnitude) and dissociates from the Q(B) binding site of the protein with a high rate of 4000 s(-)(1). Concomitantly, superoxide is being produced. No H(+) ion is taken up, and no quinol is created by the photocycle which is operating in about 25% of the reaction centers at the highest light intensity (5500 s(-)(1)) and slowest proton uptake (3.5 s(-)(1)) used in our experiments. The possible physical background of the light-induced conformational change and the relationship between the energies of dissociation and redox changes of the quinone in the Q(B) binding sites are discussed.     

Coupling of cytochrome and quinone turnovers in the photocycle of reaction centers from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

A minimal kinetic model of the photocycle, including both quinone (Q-6) reduction at the secondary quinone-binding site and (mammalian) cytochrome c oxidation at the cytochrome docking site of isolated reaction centers from photosynthetic purple bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides, was elaborated and tested by cytochrome photooxidation under strong continuous illumination. The typical rate of photochemical excitation by a laser diode at 810 nm was 2.200 s-1, and the rates of stationary turnover of the reaction center (one-half of that of cytochrome photooxidation) were 600 +/- 70 s-1 at pH 6 and 400 +/- 50 s-1 at pH 8. The rate of turnover showed strong pH dependence, indicating the contribution of different rate-limiting processes. The kinetic limitation of the photocycle was attributed to the turnover of the cytochrome c binding site (pH < 6), light intensity and quinone/quinol exchange (6 < pH < 8), and proton-coupled second electron transfer in the quinone acceptor complex (pH > 8). The analysis of the double-reciprocal plot of the rate of turnover versus light intensity has proved useful in determining the light-independent (maximum) turnover rate of the reaction center (445 +/- 50 s-1 at pH 7.8).     

Unbinding of oxidized cytochrome c from photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides is the bottleneck of fast turnover

To understand the details of rate limitation of turnover of the photosynthetic reaction center, photooxidation of horse heart cytochrome c by reaction center from Rhodobacter spheroides in detergent dispersion has been examined by intense continuous illumination under a wide variety of conditions of cytochrome concentration, ionic strength, viscosity, temperature, light intensity, and pH. The observed steady-state turnover rate of the cytochrome was not light intensity limited. In accordance with recent findings [Larson, J. W., Wells, T. A., and Wraight, C. A. (1998) Biophys. J. 74 (2), A76], the turnover rate increased with increasing bulk ionic strength in the range of 0-40 mM NaCl from 1000 up to 2300 s(-)(1) and then decreased at high ionic strength under conditions of excess cytochrome and ubiquinone and a photochemical rate constant of 4500 s(-)(1). Furthermore, we found the following: (i) The contribution of donor (cytochrome c) and acceptor (ubiquinone) sides as well as the binding of reduced and the release of oxidized cytochrome c could be separated in the observed kinetics. At neutral and acidic pH (when the proton transfer is not rate limiting) and at low or moderate ionic strength, the turnover rate of the reaction center was limited primarily by the low release rate of the photooxidized cytochrome c (product inhibition). At high ionic strength, however, the binding rate of the reduced cytochrome c decreased dramatically and became the bottleneck. The observed activation energy of the steady-state turnover rate reflected the changes in limiting mechanisms: 1.5 kcal/mol at 4 mM and 5.7 kcal/mol at 100 mM ionic strength. A similar distinction was observed in the viscosity dependence of the turnover rate: the decrease was steep (eta(-)(1)) at 40 and 100 mM ionic strengths and moderate (eta(-)(0.2)) under low-salt (4 mM) conditions. (ii) The rate of quinone exchange at the acceptor side with excess ubiquinone-30 or ubiquinone-50 was higher than the cytochrome exchange at the donor side and did not limit the observed rate of cytochrome turnover. (iii) Multivalent cations exerted effects not only through ionic strength (screening) but also by direct interaction with surface charge groups (ion-pair production). Heavy metal ion Cd(2+) bound to the RC with apparent dissociation constant of 14 microM. (iv) A two-state model of collisional interaction between reaction center and cytochrome c together with simple electrostatic considerations in the calculation of rate constants was generally sufficient to describe the kinetics of photooxidation of dimer and cytochrome c. (v) The pH dependence of cytochrome turnover rate indicated that the steady-state turnover rate of the cytochrome under high light conditions was not determined by the isoelectric point of the reaction center (pI = 6. 1) but by the carboxyl residues near the docking site.     

Light-harvesting complex 1 stabilizes P+QB- charge separation in reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

The kinetics of charge recombination following photoexcitation by a laser pulse have been analyzed in the reaction center-light harvesting complex 1 (RC-LH1) purified from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. In RC-LH1 core complexes isolated from photosynthetically grown cells P(+)Q(B)(-) recombines with an average rate constant, k approximately 0.3 s(-1), more than three times smaller than that measured in RC deprived of the LH1 (k approximately 1 s(-1)). A comparable, slowed recombination kinetics is observed in RC-LH1 complexes purified from a pufX-deleted strain. Slowing of the charge recombination kinetics is even more pronounced in RC-LH1 complexes isolated from wild-type semiaerobically grown cells (k approximately 0.2 s(-1)). Since the kinetics of P(+)Q(A)(-) recombination is unaffected by the presence of the antenna, the P(+)Q(B)(-) state appears to be energetically stabilized in core complexes. Determinations of the ubiquinone-10 (UQ(10)) complement associated with the purified RC-LH1 complexes always yield UQ(10)/RC ratios larger than 10. These quinone molecules are functionally coupled to the RC-LH1 complex, as judged from the extent of exogenous cytochrome c(2) rapidly oxidized under continuous light excitation. Analysis of P(+)Q(B)(-) recombination, based on a kinetic model which considers fast quinone equilibrium at the Q(B) binding site, indicates that the slowing down of charge recombination kinetics observed in RC-LH1 complexes cannot be explained solely by a quinone concentration effect and suggests that stabilization of the light-induced charge separation is predominantly due to interaction of the Q(B) site with the LH1 complex. The high UQ(10) complements detected in RC-LH1 core complexes, but not in purified light-harvesting complex 2 and in RC, are proposed to reflect an in vivo heterogeneity in the distribution of the quinone pool within the chromatophore bilayer.     

Modeling binding kinetics at the Q(A) site in bacterial reaction centers

Bacterial reaction centers (RCs) catalyze a series of electron-transfer reactions reducing a neutral quinone to a bound, anionic semiquinone. The dissociation constants and association rates of 13 tailless neutral and anionic benzo- and naphthoquinones for the Q(A) site were measured and compared. The K(d) values for these quinones range from 0.08 to 90 microM. For the eight neutral quinones, including duroquinone (DQ) and 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone (UQ(0)), the quinone concentration and solvent viscosity dependence of the association rate indicate a second-order rate-determining step. The association rate constants (k(on)) range from 10(5) to 10(7) M(-)(1) s(-)(1). Association and dissociation rate constants were determined at pH values above the hydroxyl pK(a) for five hydroxyl naphthoquinones. These negatively charged compounds are competitive inhibitors for the Q(A) site. While the neutral quinones reach equilibrium in milliseconds, anionic hydroxyl quinones with similar K(d) values take minutes to bind or dissociate. These slow rates are independent of ionic strength, solvent viscosity, and quinone concentration, indicating a first-order rate-limiting step. The anionic semiquinone, formed by forward electron transfer at the Q(A) site, also dissociates slowly. It is not possible to measure the association rate of the unstable semiquinone. However, as the protein creates kinetic barriers for binding and releasing anionic hydroxyl quinones without greatly increasing the affinity relative to neutral quinones, it is suggested that the Q(A) site may do the same for anionic semiquinone. Thus, the slow semiquinone dissociation may not indicate significant thermodynamic stabilization of the reduced species in the Q(A) site.     

Novel cyanide inhibition at cytochrome c1 of Rhodobacter capsulatus cytochrome bc1

Oxidized cytochrome c(1) in photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus cytochrome bc(1) reversibly binds cyanide with surprisingly high, micromolar affinity. The binding dramatically lowers the redox midpoint potential of heme c(1) and inhibits steady-state turnover activity of the enzyme. As cytochrome c(1), an auxiliary redox center of the high-potential chain of cytochrome bc(1), does not interact directly with the catalytic quinone/quinol binding sites Q(o) and Q(i), cyanide introduces a novel, Q-site independent locus of inhibition. This is the first report of a reversible inhibitor that manipulates the energetics and electron transfers of the high-potential redox chain of cytochrome bc(1), while maintaining quinone substrate catalytic sites in an intact form.     

The effects of protein crowding in bacterial photosynthetic membranes on the flow of quinone redox species between the photochemical reaction center and the ubiquinol-cytochrome c2 oxidoreductase

Atomic force microscopy (AFM) of the native architecture of the intracytoplasmic membrane (ICM) of a variety of species of purple photosynthetic bacteria, obtained at submolecular resolution, shows a tightly packed arrangement of light harvesting (LH) and reaction center (RC) complexes. Since there are no unattributed structures or gaps with space sufficient for the cytochrome bc(1) or ATPase complexes, they are localized in membrane domains distinct from the flat regions imaged by AFM. This has generated a renewed interest in possible long-range pathways for lateral diffusion of UQ redox species that functionally link the RC and the bc(1) complexes. Recent proposals to account for UQ flow in the membrane bilayer are reviewed, along with new experimental evidence provided from an analysis of intrinsic near-IR fluorescence emission that has served to test these hypotheses. The results suggest that different mechanism of UQ flow exist between species such as Rhodobacter sphaeroides, with a highly organized arrangement of LH and RC complexes and fast RC electron transfer turnover, and Phaeospirillum molischianum with a more random organization and slower RC turnover. It is concluded that packing density of the peripheral LH2 antenna in the Rba. sphaeroides ICM imposes constraints that significantly slow the diffusion of UQ redox species between the RC and cytochrome bc(1) complex, while in Phs. molischianum, the crowding of the ICM with LH3 has little effect upon UQ diffusion. This supports the proposal that in this type of ICM, a network of RC-LH1 core complexes observed in AFM provides a pathway for long-range quinone diffusion that is unaffected by differences in LH complex composition or organization.     

Effect of inhibitors,redox state and isoprenoid chain length on the affinity of ubiquinone for the secondary acceptor binding site in the reaction centers of photosynthetic bacteria

Quinone and inhibitor binding to Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides (R-26 and GA) reaction centers were studied using spectroscopic methods and by direct adsorption of reaction centers onto anion exchange filters in the presence of ¹⁴C-labelled quinone or inhibitor. These measurements show that as secondary acceptor, Q_B, ubiquinone (UQ) is tightly bound in the semiquinone form and loosely bound in the quinone and quinol forms. The quinol is probably more loosely bound than the quinone. o-Phenanthroline and terbutryn, a triazine inhibitor, compete with UQ and with each other for binding to the reaction center. Inhibition by o-phenanthroline of electron transfer from the primary to the secondary quinone acceptor (Q_A to Q_B) occurs via displacement of UQ from the Q_B binding site. Displacement of UQ by terbutryn is apparently accessory to the inhibition of electron transfer. Terbutryn binding is lowered by reduction of Q_B to Q^?_B but is practically unaffected by reduction of Q_A to Q^?_A in the absence of Q_B. UQ-9 and UQ-10 have a 5- to 6-fold higher binding affinity to the Q_B site than does UQ-1, indicating that the long isoprenoid chain facilitates the binding to the Q_B site.     

Binding of oxidized and reduced cytochrome c2 to photosynthetic reaction centers: plasmon-waveguide resonance spectroscopy

The dissociation constants for the binding of oxidized and reduced wild-type cytochrome c(2) from Rhodobacter capsulatus and the lysine 93 to proline mutant of cytochrome c(2) to photosynthetic reaction centers (Rhodobacter sphaeroides) has been measured to high precision using plasmon-waveguide resonance spectroscopy. For the studies reported, detergent-solubilized photosynthetic reaction center was exchanged into a phosphatidylcholine lipid bilayer to approximate the physiological environment. At physiologically relevant ionic strengths ( approximately 100 mM), we found two binding sites for the reduced wild-type cytochrome (K(D) = 10 and 150 nM), with affinities that decrease with decreasing ionic strength (2-5-fold). These results implicate nonpolar interactions as an important factor in determining the dissociation constants. Taking advantage of the ability of plasmon-waveguide resonance spectroscopy to reslove the contribution of changes in mass and of structural anisotropy to cytochrome binding, we can demonstrate very different properties for the two binding sites. In contrast, the oxidized wild-type cytochrome only binds to a single site with a K(D) of 10 nM at high ionic strength, and this site has properties similar to the low-affinity site for binding the reduced cytochrome. The binding of oxidized cytochrome c(2) has a strong ionic strength response, with the affinity decreasing approximately 30-fold in going from high to low ionic strength. The K93P mutant binds to a single site in both redox states, which is similar, in terms of mass and structural anisotropy, to the oxidized wild-type site, with the affinity of the mutant oxidized state being approximately 30-fold weaker than that of the oxidized wild-type cytochrome at high ionic strength. Thus, reduced wild-type cytochrome can bind to both the high- and low-affinity sites, while the oxidized wild-type cytochrome and both redox states of the mutant cytochrome can only bind to the low-affinity site, possibly the consequence of the more stable structure of reduced wild-type cytochrome. In aggregate, the results are consistent with a model in which a transient conformational change in the region 88-102 in the cytochrome three-dimensional structure, the so-called hinge region, drives the dissociation of the oxidized cytochrome from the reaction center-cytochrome complex, facilitating turnover.     

Electrogenic proton transfer in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers: effect of coenzyme Q(10) substitution by decylubiquinone in the Q(B) binding site.

An electrometric technique was used to investigate the effect of coenzyme Q(10) (UQ), substitution by decylubiquinone (dQ) at the Q(B) binding site of reaction centers (UQ-RC and dQ-RC, respectively) on the electrogenic proton transfer kinetics upon Q(B) reduction in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chromatophores. Unlike dQ-RC, the kinetics of the second flash-induced proton uptake in UQ-RC clearly deviated from the mono-exponential one. The activation energy (about 30 kJ/mol) and the pH profile of the kinetics in dQ-RC were similar to those in UQ-RC, with the power law approximation used in the latter case. The interpretation of the data presumed the quinone translocation between the two binding positions within the Q(B) site. It is proposed that the native isoprenyl side chain (in contrast to decyl chain) favors the equilibrium binding of neutral quinone at the redox-active 'proximal' position, but causes a higher barrier for the hydroquinone movement from 'proximal' to 'distal' position.     

Effect of Temperature on Rates of Alternative and Cytochrome Pathway Respiration and Their Relationship with the Redox Poise of the Quinone Pool

We investigated the effect of short-term changes in temperature on alternative (Alt) and cytochrome (Cyt) pathway respiration, both in intact tissues and isolated mitochondria of 14-d-old cotyledons of soybean (Glycine max L. cv Stevens). We also established the extent to which temperature alters the interaction between the oxidizing pathways and the level of ubiquinone (UQ) reduction (UQ(r)/UQ(t)). No difference was found between the temperature coefficient of respiration (Q(10); proportional change per 10 degrees C) of Alt and Cyt pathway respiration in cotyledon slices (Q(10) = 1.92 and 1.86, respectively). In isolated mitochondria, the Q(10) of the fully activated Alt pathway (Q(10) = 2.24-2.61) was always equal to, or higher than, that of Cyt c oxidase (COX) alone (Q(10) = 2.08) and the complete Cyt pathway (Q(10) = 2.40-2.55). This was true regardless of substrate or whether ADP was present. There was little difference in the Q(10) of the Cyt pathway with or without ADP; however, the Q(10) of COX was substantially lower in the presence of an uncoupler (Q(10) = 1.61) than its absence (Q(10) = 2.08). The kinetics of Alt and Cyt pathway activity in relation to UQ(r)/UQ(t) were not affected by temperature. For a given UQ(r)/UQ(t) value, the proportion of maximum flux taking place was similar at all temperatures for both pathways (+/-ADP). However, the Q(10) of the Alt and the Cyt pathways (+ADP) increased with increasing UQ(r)/UQ(t). We conclude that the Alt pathway is not less temperature sensitive than the Cyt pathway or COX per se and that changes in the degree of control exerted by individual steps in the respiratory apparatus could result in changes in the Q(10) of mitochondrial O(2) uptake.     

Functional consequences of the organization of the photosynthetic apparatus in Rhodobacter sphaeroides: II. A study of PufX- membranes

In the bacterium R. sphaeroides, the polypeptide PufX is indispensable for photosynthetic growth. Its deletion is known to have important consequences on the organization of the photosynthetic apparatus. In the wild-type strain, complexes between the reaction center (RC) and the antenna (light-harvesting complex 1 (LH1)) are associated in dimers, and LH1 does not fully encircle the RC. In the absence of PufX, the complexes become monomeric, and the LH1 ring closes around the RC. We analyzed the functional consequences of PufX deletion. Some effects can be ascribed to the monomerization of the RC.LH1 complexes: the number of RCs that share a common antenna for excitation transfer or a common quinone pool become smaller. We examined the kinetic effects of the closed LH1 ring on quinone turnover: diffusion across LH1 entails a delay of approximately 1 ms, and the barrier appears to be located directly against the quinone-binding (secondary quinone acceptor (Q(B))) pocket. The diffusion of ubiquinol from the RC to the cytochrome bc1 complex is approximately 2-fold slower in the mutant, suggesting an increased distance between the two complexes. The properties of the Q(B) pocket (binding of inhibitors, stabilization of Q(B-), and rate of Q(B)-H2 formation) appear to be modified in the mutant. Another specificity of PufX- is the accumulation of closed centers in the Q(A-) (where Q(A) is the primary quinone acceptor) state as the secondary acceptor pool becomes reduced, which is probably the origin of photosynthetic incompetence. We suggest that this is related to the Q(B) pocket alterations. The malfunction of the reaction center is probably due to a faulty association with LH1 that is prevented in the PufX-containing structure.     

Differences in protonation of ubiquinone and menaquinone in fumarate reductase from Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli quinol-fumarate reductase operates with both natural quinones, ubiquinone (UQ) and menaquinone (MQ), at a single quinone binding site. We have utilized a combination of mutagenesis, kinetic, EPR, and Fourier transform infrared methods to study the role of two residues, Lys-B228 and Glu-C29, at the quinol-fumarate reductase quinone binding site in reactions with MQ and UQ. The data demonstrate that Lys-B228 provides a strong hydrogen bond to MQ and is essential for reactions with both quinone types. Substitution of Glu-C29 with Leu and Phe caused a dramatic decrease in enzymatic reactions with MQ in agreement with previous studies, however, the succinate-UQ reductase reaction remains unaffected. Elimination of a negative charge in Glu-C29 mutant enzymes resulted in significantly increased stabilization of both UQ-* and MQ-* semiquinones. The data presented here suggest similar hydrogen bonding of the C1 carbonyl of both MQ and UQ, whereas there is different hydrogen bonding for their C4 carbonyls. The differences are shown by a single point mutation of Glu-C29, which transforms the enzyme from one that is predominantly a menaquinol-fumarate reductase to one that is essentially only functional as a succinate-ubiquinone reductase. These findings represent an example of how enzymes that are designed to accommodate either UQ or MQ at a single Q binding site may nevertheless develop sufficient plasticity at the binding pocket to react differently with MQ and UQ.     

The IleL229 → Met mutation impairs the quinone binding to the QB-pocket in reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides

A spontaneous mutant (R/89) of photosynthetic purple bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26 was selected for resistance to 200 M atrazin. It showed increased resistance to interquinone electron transfer inhibitors of o-phenanthroline (resistance factor, RF=20) in UQ_o reconstituted isolated reaction centers and terbutryne in reaction centers (RF=55) and in chromatophores (RF=85). The amino acid sequence of the Q_B binding protein of the photosynthetic reaction center (the L subunit) was determined by sequencing the corresponding pufL gene and a single mutation was found (Ile^L229 Met). The changed amino acid of the mutant strain is in van der Waals contact with the secondary quinone Q_B. The binding and redox properties of Q_B in the mutant were characterized by kinetic (charge recombination) and multiple turnover (cytochrome oxidation and semiquinone oscillation) assays of the reaction center. The free energy for stabilization of Q_AQ_B ^– with respect to Q_A ^–Q_B was G_AB=–60 meV and 0 meV in reaction centers and G_AB=–85 meV and –46 meV in chromatophores of R-26 and R/89 strains at pH 8, respectively. The dissociation constants of the quinone UQ_o and semiquinone UQ_o ^– in reaction centers from R-26 and R/89 showed significant and different pH dependence. The observed changes in binding and redox properties of quinones are interpreted in terms of differential effects (electrostatics and mesomerism) of mutation on the oxidized and reduced states of Q_B.Abbreviations BChl bacteriochlorophyll - Ile isoleucine - Met methionin - P primary donor - Q_A primary quinone acceptor - Q_B secondary quinone acceptor - RC reaction center protein - UQ_o 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl benzoquinone - UQ₁₀ ubiquinone 50 This work is dedicated to the memory of Randall Ross Stein (1954–1994) and is, in a small way, a testament to the impact which Randy's ideas have had on the development of the field of competitive herbicide binding.     

Photochemical Electron Transport in Photosynthetic Reaction Centers from Rhodopseudomonas spheroides: II. Interaction with external Electron Donors and Acceptors and a Reevaluation of Some Spectroscopic Data

Photochemical reaction centers prepared from Rhodopseudomonas spheroides were treated with reduced cytochrome c (cyt c), and in some cases with ubiquinone (UQ), and illuminated. The light-induced oxidation of cy and reduction of UQ were observed, and also the variations in fluorescence of P870. These observations indicated that each reaction center contains a primary photochemical electron acceptor capable of holding just one electron. Depending on the method of preparation, the reaction centers may also contain secondary electron acceptor pools consisting mainly of UQ. The role of native UQ as an electron acceptor could be duplicated by added UQ. The yield of P870 fluorescence increased by a factor of 3-4, at most, during illumination of reaction centers in the presence of an electron donor such as reduced cyt. This suggests that the quantum efficiency for the primary photoact is about 0.7, rather than 0.9-1.0 as concluded in the past from optical absorption measurements. The apparent quantum efficiency for the oxidation of cyt by illuminated reaction centers can be increased by the addition of UQ and is decreased at higher concentrations of the detergent lauryl dimethylamine oxide (LDAO). These treatments do not affect the quantum efficiency of P870 oxidation, measured in the absence of cyt.     

Photooxidation of cytochrome b559 and the electron donors in chloroplast Photosystem II

The effect of light on the reaction center of Photosystem II was studied by differential absorption spectroscopy in spinach chloroplasts.

At − 196 °C, continuous illumination results in a parallel reduction of C-550 and oxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉ high potential. With flash excitation, C-550 is reduced, but only a small fraction of cytochrome b₅₅₉ is oxidized. The specific effect of flash illumination is suppressed if the chloroplasts are preilluminated by one flash at 0 °C.

At − 50 °C, continuous illumination results in the reduction of C-550 but little oxidation of cytochrome b₅₅₉. However, complete oxidation is obtained if the chloroplasts have been preilluminated by one flash at 0 °C. The effect of preillumination is not observed in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea.

A model is discussed for the reaction center, with two electron donors, cytochrome b₅₅₉ and Z, acting in competition. Their respective efficiency is dependent on temperature and on their states of oxidation. The specific effect of flash excitation is attributed to a two-photon reaction, possibly based on energy-trapping properties of the oxidized trap chlorophyll.     

Proton and electron transfer in bacterial reaction centers

The bacterial reaction center couples light-induced electron transfer to proton pumping across the membrane by reactions of a quinone molecule Q(B) that binds two electrons and two protons at the active site. This article reviews recent experimental work on the mechanism of the proton-coupled electron transfer and the pathways for proton transfer to the Q(B) site. The mechanism of the first electron transfer, k((1))(AB), Q(-)(A)Q(B)-->Q(A)Q(-)(B), was shown to be rate limited by conformational gating. The mechanism of the second electron transfer, k((2))(AB), was shown to involve rapid reversible proton transfer to the semiquinone followed by rate-limiting electron transfer, H(+)+Q(-)(A)Q(-)(B) ifQ(-)(A)Q(B)H-->Q(A)(Q(B)H)(-). The pathways for transfer of the first and second protons were elucidated by high-resolution X-ray crystallography as well as kinetic studies showing changes in the rate of proton transfer due to site directed mutations and metal ion binding.     

Preferential binding of equine ferricytochrome c to the bacterial photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Redox titration of horse heart cytochrome c (cyt c), in the presence of varying concentrations of detergent-solubilized photosynthetic reaction center (RC) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides, revealed an RC concentration-dependent decrease in the measured cyt c midpoint potential that is indicative of a 3.6 +/- 0.2-fold stronger binding affinity of oxidized cytochrome to a single binding site. This effect was correlated with preferential binding in the functional complex by redox titration of the fraction of RCs exhibiting microsecond, first-order, special pair reduction by cytochrome. A binding affinity ratio of 3.1 +/- 0.4 was determined by this second technique, confirming the result. Redox titration of flash-induced intracomplex electron transfer also showed the association in the electron transfer-active complex to be strong, with a dissociation constant of 0.17 +/- 0.03 microM. The tight binding is associated with a slow off-rate which, in the case of the oxidized form, can influence the kinetics of P(+) reduction. The pitfalls of the common use of xenon flashlamps to photoexcite fast electron-transfer reactions are discussed with relation to the first electron transfer from primary to secondary RC quinone acceptors. The results shed some light on the diversity of kinetic behavior reported for the cytochrome to RC electron-transfer reaction.     

-deltaG(AB) and pH dependence of the electron transfer from P(+)Q(A)(-)Q(B) toP(+)Q(A)Q(B)(-) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers

The electron transfer from the reduced primary quinone (Q(A)(-)) to the secondary quinone (Q(B)) can occur in two phases with a well-characterized 100 micros component (tau(2)) and a faster process occurring in less than 10 micros (tau(1)). The fast reaction is clearly seen when the native ubiquinone-10 at Q(A) is replaced with naphthoquinones. The dependence of tau(1) on the free-energy difference between the P(+)Q(A)(-)Q(B) and P(+)Q(A)Q(B)(-) states (-) and on the pH was measured using naphthoquinones with different electrochemical midpoint potentials as Q(A) in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers (RCs) and in RCs where - is changed by mutation of M265 in the Q(A) site from Ile to Thr (M265IT). Q(B) was ubiquinone (UQ(B)) in all cases. Electron transfer was measured by using the absorption differences of the naphthosemiquinone at Q(A) and the ubisemiquinone at Q(B) between 390 and 500 nm. As - was changed from -90 to -250 meV tau(1) decreased from 29 to 0.2 micros. The free-energy dependence of tau(1) provides a reorganization energy of 850 +/- 100 meV for the electron transfer from Q(A)(-) to Q(B). The slower reaction at tau(2) is free-energy independent, so processes other than electron transfer determine the observed rate. The fraction of the reaction at tau(1) increases with increasing driving force and is 100% of the reaction when - is approximately 100 meV more favorable than in the native RCs with ubiquinone as Q(A). The fast phase, tau(1), is pH independent from pH 6 to 11 while tau(2) slows above pH 9. As the Q(A) isoprene tail length is increased from 2 to 10 isoprene units the fraction at tau(1) decreases. However, tau(1), tau(2), and the fraction of the reaction in each phase are independent of the tail length of UQ(B).