Simplifying the vertical reduction mammaplasty

The vertical reduction mammaplasty is an evolving technique. Its proponents report significantly decreased scarring, better breast shape, and more stable results compared with the standard inverted-T method, but the learning curve is long and cosmetic outcomes can be inconsistent. Many surgeons have experimented with the vertical closure before returning to methods more familiar to them. The authors present their modifications to the vertical reduction mammaplasty. Their changes simplify the preoperative markings and the intraoperative technique to shorten the learning curve while maintaining reliable aesthetic results. With the patient standing, only four preoperative marks are made: (1) the inframammary fold; (2) the breast axis; (3) the apex of the new nipple-areola complex; and (4) the medial and lateral limbs of the vertical incision. In the operating room, a medial or a superomedial pedicle is developed. Excess breast skin is resected with the inferior and lateral parenchyma as a C-shaped wedge. The lateral skin-adipose flap is redraped inferomedially and sutured to the chest wall. The inferior aspect of the breast is aggressively debulked and a gathering subcuticular stitch is started 2 cm below the nadir of the nipple-areola complex. Finally, a 38-mm to 42-mm nipple-areola complex marker is used to create a circular defect that is offset 0.5 cm medial to the vertical axis of the breast. In their series, 56 patients were treated and no major complications were noted. The median follow-up period was 17 months. The average reduction was 554.5 g per breast; however, the reduction was greater than 1000 g per breast in eight patients. The authors found that (1) chest wall anchoring improves lateral contour and minimizes axillary fullness; (2) aggressive debulking inferiorly avoids the persistent inferior bulge; and (3) starting the subcuticular gathering suture 2 cm below the nipple-areola complex followed by placement of a nipple-areola complex marker at the conclusion of the case prevents lateral deviation and corrects the nipple-areola complex teardrop deformity. These innovations accelerate the learning curve by simplifying the preoperative markings and lead to more consistent postoperative results and an improved cosmetic outcome. In conclusion, these modifications yield a simple, easily learned vertical reduction mammaplasty with aesthetically reliable results.     

Outcome study: periareolar mammaplasty patients' perspective

Residual scars on occasion compromise patient satisfaction with breast reduction procedures. Periareolar breast reduction was proposed to minimize the scarring produced by the operation. This technique was criticized predominantly for producing a breast with low projection, for recurrence of ptosis after surgery, and for widening of the periareolar scar. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction from this technique. In the first branch of the study, 11 patients who had periareolar or circumareolar breast reduction were compared with 13 patients who had vertical scar reduction mammaplasty. The groups were matched for patient's age, size of reduction, and follow-up period. The patients were contacted by phone and requested to comment on four aspects of their operation: breast size, symmetry, quality of scars, and appearance and position of the nipple-areola complex. The replies were converted to numerical values and analyzed statistically. A panel of three women, prospective patients for breast reduction, were presented with standardized five-view before-and-after photographs and requested to score the results using the same criteria. Their responses were analyzed in the same manner. Both phases of the study produced similar results. Breast reduction done through a periareolar scar scored higher than a vertical scar technique. The operation did not differ with respect to shape, symmetry, or nipple-areola shape but did with respect to dissatisfaction with scars, which affected the overall result. This experimental model of assessing results of cosmetic operations is proposed as a tool to assess the patient's rather than the surgeon's perspective of a surgical technique, and it could find application in assessing other cosmetic operations.     

A Z-mammaplasty with minimal scarring

An improved technique for reduction mammaplasty is described that has the advantage of giving a satisfactory final shape to the breast while producing a minimal scar. The method involves periareolar deepithelialization with displacement of the nipple-areola complex, partial subcutaneous mastectomy at the base of the mammary cone, and a Z-plasty to interlock two triangles of skin left after the removal of a little excess skin in the region above the inframammary fold. The Z-plasty adds skin vertically to the inferior pole, resulting in a better final shape and reducing tension around the areola. Any further excess skin is left to retract spontaneously. The best indications for this operation are in young women with elastic skin free of striae "gravidarum." Our experience now covers 53 patients aged 14 to 30 years with reductions of up to 900 gm per breast, and we have encountered no major complications over a 3-year follow-up period.     

Reduction mammaplasty following radiation therapy for breast cancer.

This report describes an unusual case in which reduction mammaplasty was performed following radiation therapy for breast cancer. While healing was significantly prolonged (compared with the nonirradiated contralateral breast), the final result was satisfactory from both the functional and the aesthetic standpoint. Women with prior radiation therapy may be considered candidates for reduction mammaplasty. Patients should be warned of the increased risks of wound complications, the likelihood of delayed healing, and the possibility of pigmentation changes in the grafted nipple-areola complex. We elected to transpose the nipple as a full-thickness graft, but consideration also might be given to use of an inferiorly based pedicle flap.     

Mammaplasty: large reduction with short inframammary scars

We present a technique for reduction mammaplasty that produces small inframammary scars measuring a maximum of 8 cm in large reductions and practically eliminates the difficulty in the mobility of the nipple-areola complex. We believe that the greatest contribution of the technique presented here is that good aesthetic results were obtained together with small inframammary scars.     

Maximizing breast projection after free-nipple-graft reduction mammaplasty

In 1922, Thorek described standard free-nipple reduction mammaplasty for gigantomastia. This technique provided a simple and effective way to perform reduction mammaplasty. However, the technique is frequently criticized for producing a breast and nipple with poor projection. Even with the standard modification of the original technique, the resultant breast and nipple may be wide and flat, with unpredictable nipple-areola pigmentation. To create a breast mound and nipple with projection and even pigmentation, the free-nipple-graft breast reduction technique is presented. The Wise pattern skin reduction markings and the superiorly based parenchymal reduction technique are used. After the nipple-areola complex is removed, as a free graft, the inferior pole of the breast is then amputated along the Wise pattern skin markings, leaving lateral and medial pillars of breast tissue, with the apex of the resection corresponding to the new nipple location. The lateral and medial pillars of the superiorly based breast mound are then sutured together. Key interrupted sutures are placed, beginning at the most inferior and posterior point of the pillars, while recruiting tissue centrally to increase the projection. The intersecting point of the inverted T, at 7 cm from the new nipple position, is then sutured to the fasciae of the pectoralis major muscle. If more central projection is desired, the vertical limb design can be lengthened. The tissue inferior to the 7-cm mark is de-epithelialized and tucked under the central breast, if needed, contributing further to the final breast parenchyma projection. The skin of the vertical limb of the Wise pattern is then closed with a dog-ear at the apex to further contribute to nipple projection. The nipple is replaced as a free, thick, split-thickness skin graft. The breast is temporarily closed, and the medial and lateral breast tissue excess is liposuctioned to create a more conical breast. Excessive medial and lateral skin is then resected, keeping the inframammary crease incision under the breast mound. Twenty-five patients underwent free-nipple-graft reduction mammaplasty using this technique between 1992 and 2000. An average of 1600 g of breast tissue per breast was removed. The average follow-up period was 36 months. Patient satisfaction has been very high.     

Dermal suspension flap in vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty

Reduction mammaplasty has the following goals: appropriate reduction of breast size, symmetric and youthful breast shape, minimal and inconspicuous scars, and stable, long-term results. Although the first two parameters can be obtained by various reduction techniques, vertical-scar mammaplasty eliminates the horizontal inframammary scar, thereby reducing total scar length. Dermal flaps have been described in various types of reduction mammaplasty. The refinement of the authors' method is the incorporation of a superiorly pedicled dermal flap for better and longer-lasting support in vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty. A total of 73 vertical breast reductions in 38 patients were performed with this technique from May of 1996 to November of 1999. Vertical-scar reduction mammaplasty with a dermal suspension flap combines minimal scars with an internal support for long-term stability of the breast shape.     

Cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery in blacks

Black women have not embraced cosmetic and reconstructive surgery of the breast with the same enthusiasm as their Caucasian counterparts because of fear of hypertrophic scars. The authors offer suggestions on how to minimize the scarring associated with breast surgery in black women. They feel that intraareolar incisions should be used whenever circumareolar incisions are indicated in augmentation mammaplasty, because the areola, being a favored area, is less likely to produce hypertrophic scars. The Marchac technique of reduction mammaplasty is recommended because it produces a short horizontal scar of 5 to 8 cm confined to the breast without medial and lateral extension, which may hypertrophy in black women. In the reduction of large breasts, secondary excision of dogears 6 or more weeks after mammaplasty reduces the medial and lateral extents of the scar. The use of liposuction as an adjunct to reduction mammaplasty may also accomplish the same thing. Amputation and free nipple-areola grafting should be used with caution in black patients because of the tendency of the grafted areola to hypopigment. In postmastectomy reconstruction, the authors suggest that the techniques described by Ryan and Radovan should be considered first before the techniques of reconstruction utilizing myocutaneous flaps. In these procedures, no new scars which may hypertrophy are created away from the site of reconstruction. Staples should not be used in skin closure in blacks because they cause cross-hatching of the wound even when removed early.     

Medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty for severe mammary hypertrophy

Current options in reduction mammaplasty for severe mammary hypertrophy include amputation with free-nipple graft as well as the inferior pedicle and bipedicle techniques. Complications of these procedures include nipple-areola necrosis, insensitivity, and hypopigmentation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty can minimize these complications. Twenty-three patients with severe mammary hypertrophy were studied. The medial pedicle successfully transposed the nipple-areola complex in 44 of 45 breasts (98 percent). Mean change in nipple position was 17.1 cm, and mean weight of tissue removed was 1604 g per breast. Nipple-areola sensation was retained in 43 of 44 breasts (98 percent) using a medial pedicle. Hypopigmentation was not observed, and central breast projection was restored in all patients. This study has demonstrated that medial pedicle reduction mammaplasty is a safe and reliable technique and should be given primary consideration in cases of severe mammary hypertrophy.     

Reduction mammaplasty with the "owl" incision and no undermining

Reduction mammaplasty has traditionally been done using the Wise pattern of incision. Because of the box-like effect in breast shape, the lack of projection, and the long scars associated with the inverted T incision, two techniques have emerged as alternatives: the vertical reduction of Lassus/Lejour and the "round block" periareolar technique popularized by Benelli. Each of these techniques has its pros and cons.The "owl" incision combines the features of the large periareolar reduction (Benelli's) and the vertical reduction (Lassus/Lejour); the horizontal inframammary scar is either made very short or completely eliminated. Volume reduction is done through a heart-shaped parenchymal resection, leaving the nipple-areolar complex over a supero-central pedicle. Maintenance of the central parenchyma behind the nipple-areolar complex and mobilization of the vertical pillars toward the center of the breast give excellent projection and diminish the lateral fullness. Enlargement of the periareolar skin resection diminishes the length and pleating of the vertical scar; conversely, inclusion of the vertical component to the periareolar technique eliminates the pleating effect of the periareolar incision. The short horizontal excision eliminates any resultant "dog ears" in the new inframammary fold. Thus, the discrepancy in the length of scars is better distributed. There is no skin or parenchymal undermining, so drains are not needed. Excellent results are obtained immediately on the operating table, and large volumes of glandular resection and correction of severe ptosis can be accomplished without compromising vascularity of either the nipple-areolar complex or the skin flaps.Ninety-four patients in a 7-year period were operated upon using this technique. Seventy-two had bilateral reductions up to 1900 gm per breast, 12 had unilateral reduction for symmetry following breast reconstruction, and 10 were patients with severe ptosis. Complications were rare and of a minor nature. No conversion to free grafts was done, even in the larger resections. One case required minor revision under local anesthesia, one case required bilateral re-reduction, and another case required unilateral re-reduction for continued growth of breast tissue. Almost 90 percent of the patients underwent procedures as outpatients.The owl-type incision and the supero-central pedicle flap are elements of a reduction mammaplasty technique that provides excellent projection and shape with minimal visible scars. It takes advantage of the positive features of the periareolar and vertical reduction techniques and minimizes their negative features. The new design of parenchymal resection improves the vascularity of the residual flaps. Additionally, it may better preserve the sensation to the nipple-areolar complex and lactation is not compromised.     

"I" becomes "L": modification of vertical mammaplasty

The problems of the vertical mammaplasty by Lejour (i.e., gathering the skin envelope in one vertical suture, frequent secondary healing problems, and later sagging of the inferior glandular part in the case of large and very large breasts) are well known. A simple modification of the Lejour technique, that is, adding a lateral inframammary scar to shorten the vertical scar length, is presented. The modified L technique was used in 45 patients (90 breasts) between October of 1999 and August of 2001. With an average follow-up of 13 months, the jugular notch-to-nipple distance was 21 cm, the vertical scar length was 8.4 cm, the lateral inframammary scar length was 11 cm, and the average resection weight was 625 g per breast (range, 200 g to 2080 g). Even among patients who had very large glandular bases and resection weights it was possible to achieve a breast base reduction, modeling the glandular corpus to a harmonic, well-projecting, and youthful shape. Slight wound-healing problems with spontaneous cicatrization within 2 weeks occurred in six patients. In two patients who exhibited gigantomastia up to 2080 g per breast, partial mamilla necrosis occurred on one side. Ninety-one percent of the patients reported being "very satisfied" with the outcome, and 9 percent reporting being "satisfied." The authors' modification of the vertical mammaplasty to an L-shaped scar technique enables the surgeon to apply the principles of the Lejour technique for higher resection weights and diminishes wound-healing problems, and it is still a scar-minimizing technique that results in a scar-free cleavage. It is easy to learn and an ideal standard technique for a teaching hospital.     

Secondary reduction mammaplasty: is using a different pedicle safe?

Reduction mammaplasty is a frequently performed procedure and one with consistent patient satisfaction. Few patients present for revisional procedures, and even fewer present for a secondary or repeated reduction mammaplasty. This study defines secondary reduction mammaplasty as performing an additional reduction using a pedicled nipple-areola complex. Few reports of secondary reduction are found in the literature. Operative guidelines for secondary reduction mammaplasty have been published recently. However, the experience of others has differed from these guidelines, and herein is presented another experience with secondary reduction mammaplasty. Ten cases of secondary reduction over a 37-year period were identified and reviewed. The initial reductions were performed using six different techniques. An average of 307 g of tissue per breast (range, 130 to 552 g) was removed at the initial operations. The secondary reductions were performed using four different techniques, and an average of 458 g of tissue per breast (range, 147 to 700 g) was removed at the secondary operations. Three of the 10 patients underwent initial and secondary reduction with the same technique. An average of 4 years (range, 1 to 10 years) separated these surgeries. Seven of the 10 patients underwent initial and secondary reductions with different technique. An average of 15 years (range, 5 to 19 years) separated these procedures. There was an average 5-year follow-up (range, 1 to 20 years) in this series. Four of the 10 patients experienced self-limiting complications after secondary reduction, including delay in wound healing, delay in the return of nipple sensitivity, and mild fat necrosis. Three of the four patients with complications had undergone secondary reduction with a different pedicle technique. No significant or long-lasting skin, pedicle, or nipple-areola complex compromise was found after secondary reduction mammaplasty. In contrast to the recently published guidelines, this study demonstrates that secondary reduction mammaplasty is a safe and viable option when performed with either similar or different technique. This finding allows secondary reduction mammaplasty to be tailored to the individual breast type and to the abilities of the specific surgeon.     

Repeat reduction mammaplasty

Repeat reduction mammaplasty is an uncommonly performed procedure. Currently, no clear operative guidelines of management exist. Sixteen patients (28 breasts) with a mean age of 29 years (range, 13 to 52 years) underwent repeat breast reduction over an 11-year period. Before the first reduction, the mean notch to nipple distance was 29.6 cm (range, 24 to 38 cm) and mean nipple to inframammary crease distance was 15.5 cm (range, 12 to 18 cm). The mean mass of tissue excised was 615 g per breast. A number of different pedicles were used (six inferior, five superior, four superomedial, one unknown). All patients subsequently developed pseudoptosis. The nipple to inframammary crease distance was a mean of 11.4 cm (having initially been set at 7 cm) before the second procedure. At the second operation, two patients (three breasts) had their initial pedicles transected and the nipple-areola complex moved, and both patients developed vascular compromise of the nipple-areola complex (two breasts). Where the same pedicle was used in the second operation (five patients, 10 breasts), one patient developed unilateral nipple-areola complex necrosis. In eight patients, because of the development of pseudoptosis, the nipple was in a satisfactory position, and therefore only an inferior wedge of tissue required excision. This was performed without nipple-areola complex compromise, irrespective of the initial pedicle. The mean mass of tissue excised in the second operation was 325 g per breast (range, 120 to 620 g). Fourteen patients were available for follow-up after a mean of 5.1 years (range, 3 months to 11.7 years) following the repeat reduction mammaplasty. In the repeat breast reduction, where nipple-areola complex transposition is planned, the initial pedicle should be reused to maintain nipple-areola complex perfusion. Where the initial pedicle is not known, a free nipple graft may be the safest option. In patients with pseudoptosis, in whom the nipple does not require transposition, an inferior wedge of tissue can be safely excised, irrespective of the initial pedicle.     

Superomedial pedicle technique of reduction mammaplasty

A series of 148 patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty utilizing the superomedial pedicle technique is presented. Resections as large as 4100 gm per breast with nipple-areola transpositions up to 30 cm were done with reliable nipple-areola survival, including preservation of sensation. The superior pedicle technique of breast reduction is recognized by many as technically easier and capable of producing a longer-lasting aesthetic effect. Classically, however, it has been limited to smaller resections. By incorporating the medial quadrant in the superior pedicle, more aggressive reductions can be safely undertaken with the same excellent results. Details of the procedure, the anatomic basis for its success, and complications are discussed.     

Vertical mammaplasty

Current criticisms regarding vertical mammaplasty include problems with poor immediate postoperative appearance, nipple-areola complex malposition, and excessive lower pole length. These problems can be avoided by proper patient selection, by utilizing correct concepts of skin design, and by observing correct glandular resection and closure concepts. Vertical mammaplasty also can result in other problems, such as hypertrophic circumareolar scars and lower pole deformities, including notching, boxy shape, infra-areolar depression, and flatness. These problems are also largely avoidable by using correct technique. Several basic concepts described previously have not proven necessary to achieve good results. Abandoning some of these principles has contributed to the ability to establish an aesthetically ideal breast shape intraoperatively as well as to a decrease in morbidity. This includes eliminating liposuction as a major integral component of the procedure, eliminating suturing the gland to the pectoralis muscle, not undermining the lower pole skin, and avoiding overly wide skin resection and tight wound closure that produces significant lower pole distortion in the early postoperative period. An important concept that has proven reliable is to use a "closed" design that does not predetermine the areolar opening whenever circumstances permit. When this is not possible, a modification that utilizes the smallest possible circumference as an open design is better than a large "mosque." These alternatives allow greater flexibility in determining final nipple position and also reduce the risk of hypertrophic circumareolar scars. Important glandular resection concepts include creating pillars that are attached to both the skin and the chest wall; making them of adequate dimension to avoid postoperative lower pole shape problems, such as flattening; resecting closer to the skin lateral to the pillars to avoid a boxy breast shape; and using a drain both to assist in accurately determining the endpoint of resection and to avoid postoperative seromas. Key closure concepts include approximation of the superior surfaces of the pillars at their base to maintain vertical height and thereby prevent lower pole flattening; approximation of the inferior surfaces of the pillars to the base of the breast to prevent notching; and proper management of the vertical incision by restricting the purse-string suture effect to only the inferior portion of the incision, where there may be skin excess present. Inclusion of these concepts leads to predictable and improved aesthetic results in vertical mammaplasty. This allows full realization of the purported advantages of vertical mammaplasty and allows this method to be utilized with a level of confidence similar to that seen with inverted-T techniques.     

Reduction mammaplasty in postburn breasts.

Thermal injury to the anterior chest in the adolescent girl can lead to severe disfigurement of the breasts. Just as in certain non-burn female patients, mammary hyperplasia can occur in patients with previous full-thickness burns of their breasts. Most plastic surgeons have been reluctant to perform reduction mammaplasty in these patients for fear of devascularizing the skin graft or the nipple-areola complex. A series of six patients with full-thickness burns of the breasts and subsequent skin graft coverage before reduction mammaplasty is reported. Four patients had bilaterally burned breasts requiring reduction. Two patients had one burned breast reduced, and one required a balancing procedure on the unburned side. Reduction mammaplasty was performed using the inferior-pedicle technique. The mean amount of tissue removed for the left and right breasts was 454 and 395 g, respectively. There was no nipple loss, hematoma, infection, or major loss of skin flaps. Reduction mammaplasty in this group of patients is safe and carries minimal risk if certain key concepts are followed carefully.     

Preservation of projection after reduction mammaplasty: long-term follow-up of the inferior pedicle technique

In reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicle technique, the dermal-breast pedicle can be manipulated to form a central breast mound and enhance breast projection. When this technique is applied both to macromastia and breast asymmetry, excellent early results are reported. To study the effects of time on breast reduction, 22 patients were followed for an average of 4.7 years. Contour of the breast mound and projection are well preserved. However, evaluation of long-term results reveals a gradual increase in the inframammary fold to inferior areola distance. Since no increase in the midclavicle to nipple distance is observed, inferior migration of the breast parenchyma and superior displacement of the nipple-areola with respect to the breast mound occur after reduction mammaplasty with the inferior pedicle technique.     

Refinements in transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: projection and contour improvements

A surgical procedure with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap for breast reconstruction is presented using parameters from the opposite normal breast to achieve a better cone shape in the new breast to project the nipple-areola complex. This cone projection is obtained through a vertical plication of both skin/fat halves of the TRAM flap and with two supraumbilical fat flaps to avoid cone collapse. The infraclavicular and axillary regions are filled with a de-epithelialized "fish-fin" cutaneous-fat or fat-only flap, which is placed as a lateral TRAM extension. The de-epithelialized lateral extremity of the TRAM flap folded over itself gives a mound shape to the lateral aspect of the new breast, and the inverted umbilical stalk attached to the TRAM flap imitates a nipple. This procedure is based on six breast reconstructions with a 2-year follow-up. The procedure is a simple, safe, and versatile way to mimic the opposite breast. It is mostly indicated for thin patients who have small to moderate breasts without ptosis or hypertrophy who refuse breast implants or request a mastopexy or reduction mammaplasty on the opposite normal breast during the same procedure.     

Reduction mammaplasty and correction of ptosis: dermal bra technique

A new technique for reduction mammaplasty or mastopexy techniques is presented, which the authors call the dermal bra. The surgical steps are described point by point. A series of 36 patients underwent reduction mammaplasty or mastopexy by means of this technique from January of 1998 to April of 2001. Thirty-two patients were followed; 28 presented satisfactory results, including a good mammary appearance, invisible scar, good and stable breast projection, and lasting results. Nipple-areola complex sensitivity was unchanged in all 32 patients. The overall complication rate was 12.5 percent (one patient suffered purse-string suture exposure, and three had a cutaneous rend). The advantages and disadvantages of this technique are discussed.     

A versatile breast reduction technique: Conical plicated central U shaped (COPCUs) mammaplasty

Background

There have been numerous studies on reduction mammaplasty and its modifications in the literature. The multitude of modifications of reduction mammaplasty indicates that the ideal technique has yet to be found. There are four reasons for seeking the ideal technique. One reason is to preserve functional features of the breast: breastfeeding and arousal. Other reasons are to achieve the real geometric and aesthetic shape of the breast with the least scar and are to minimize complications of prior surgical techniques without causing an additional complication. Last reason is the limitation of the techniques described before. To these aims, we developed a new versatile reduction mammaplasty technique, which we called conical plicated central U shaped (COPCUs) mammaplasty.

Methods

We performed central plication to achieve a juvenile look in the superior pole of the breast and to prevent postoperative pseudoptosis and used central U shaped flap to achieve maximum NAC safety and to preserve lactation and nipple sensation. The central U flap was 6 cm in width and the superior conical plication was performed with 2/0 PDS. Preoperative and postoperative standard measures of the breast including the superior pole fullness were compared.

Results

Forty six patients were operated with the above mentioned technique. All of the patients were satisfied with functional and aesthetic results and none of them had major complications. There were no changes in the nipple innervation. Six patients becoming pregnant after surgery did not experience any problems with lactation. None of the patients required scar revision.

Conclusion

Our technique is a versatile, safe, reliable technique which creates the least scar, avoids previously described disadvantages, provides maximum preservation of functions, can be employed in all breasts regardless of their sizes.