Influence of histone H1 on chromatin structure

Removal of histone H1 produces a transition in the structure of chromatin fibers as observed by electron microscopy. Chromatin containing all histone proteins appears as fibers with a diameter of about 250 A. The nucleosomes within these fibers are closely packed. If histone H1 is selectively removed with 50-100 mM NaCl in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) in the presence of the ion-exchange resin AG 50 W - X2, chromatin appears as "beads-on-a-string" with the nucleosomes separated from each other by distances of about 150-200 A. If chromatin is treated in the presence of the resin with NaCl at concentrations of 650 mM or more, the structural organization of the chromatin is decreased, yielding fibers of irregular appearance.     

The condensation of chromatin and histone H1-depleted chromatin by spermine

At low ionic strength, spermine induces aggregation of native and H1-depleted chromatin at spermine/phosphate (Sp/P) ratios of 0.15 and 0.3, respectively. Physico-chemical methods (electric dichroism, circular dichroism and thermal denaturation) show that spermine, at Sp/P less than 0.15, does not appreciably alter the conformation of native chromatin and interacts unspecifically with all parts of chromatin DNA (linker as well as regions slightly or tightly bound to histones). In chromatin, the role of spermine could be more important in the stabilization of higher-order structure than in the condensation of the 30 nm solenoid. The addition of spermine to H1-depleted chromatin revealed two important features: (i) spermine can partially mimic the role of histone H1 in the condensation of chromatin; (ii) the core histone octamer does not appear to play any role in the aggregation process by spermine as DNA and H1-depleted chromatin aggregate at the same Sp/P ratio.     

Yeast chromatin: Search for histone H1

Summary Yeast chromatin, isolated by a rapid procedure contains in addition to histones H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 a fifth major basic protein. This fifth polypeptide is not an intrinsic component of the nucleosome structure. It has properties of both histone and nonhistone proteins and might represent an early form of histone H1 and of high mobility group nonhistone proteins of higher eukaryotes.Electron microscopic visualization of isolated yeast nucleosomes substantiates further the similarity of the chromatin structure of this unicellular eukaryote to that of higher eukaryotes.     

Influence of linker histone H1 on chromatin remodeling.

Chromatin-remodeling complexes have been a central area of focus for research dealing with accessing cellular DNA sequestered in chromatin. Although the linker histone H1 plays a major role in promoting and maintaining higher-order chromatin structure, it has been noticeably absent from assays utilizing chromatin-remodeling enzymes. This review focuses on two ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes, Drosophila ISWI and mammalian SWI/SNF, that have been assayed using chromatin templates containing histone H1.     

Effects of H1 histone variant overexpression on chromatin structure

The importance of histone H1 heterogeneity and total H1 stoichiometry in chromatin has been enigmatic. Here we report a detailed characterization of the chromatin structure of cells overexpressing either H1(0) or H1c. Nucleosome spacing was found to change during cell cycle progression, and overexpression of either variant in exponentially growing cells results in a 15-base pair increase in nucleosome repeat length. H1 histones can also assemble on chromatin and influence nucleosome spacing in the absence of DNA replication. Overexpression of H1(0) and, to a lesser extent, H1c results in a decreased rate of digestion of chromatin by micrococcal nuclease. Using green fluorescent protein-tagged H1 variants, we show that micrococcal nuclease-resistant chromatin is specifically enriched in the H1(0) variant. Overexpression of H1(0) results in the appearance of a unique mononucleosome species of higher mobility on nucleoprotein gels. Domain switch mutagenesis revealed that either the N-terminal tail or the central globular domain of the H1(0) protein could independently give rise to this unique mononucleosome species. These results in part explain the differential effects of H1(0) and H1c in regulating chromatin structure and function.     

Exchange of histone H1 between segments of chromatin

We have asked whether histone H1 is tightly bound in chromatin at relatively low ionic strength (below physiological) or whether it can exchange between binding sites. We have studied this question in chromatin fragments generated by digestion with micrococcal nuclease, by mixing two fragments of known H1 content and different length (either a fragment radioactively labelled in all its histones with an unlabelled fragment, or two labelled fragments, only one of which contains H1) and then separating them again by centrifugation in sucrose gradients in order tom reexamine their H1 contents.At very low ionic strength (5 mm-Tris · HCl (pH 7.1), 1 mm-Na₂EDTA, 0.5 mm-phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride) there was very little (less than 5 to 10%) exchange of H1. In contrast, the presence of 70 mm-NaCl in the buffer caused rapid and complete equilibration of H1 between sites in less (possibly much less) than about one hour. At 30 mm added NaCl, the result was intermediate between those at 0 mm and 70 mm added NaCl, partial exchange occurring with a half-time of one to two hours. The results were essentially the same whether or not both fragments contained H1. We infer from these results that at physiological ionic strength (~150 mm) there will be rapid and complete equilibration of H1 between sites in chromatin. We do not know whether the exchange of particular H1 subtypes is restricted to a particular class of binding site.     

Assembly and properties of chromatin containing histone H1

The Xenopus oocyte supernatant (oocyte S-150) forms chromatin in a reaction that is affected by temperature and by the concentration of ATP and Mg. Under optimal conditions at 27 degrees C, relaxed DNA plasmids are efficiently assembled into supercoiled minichromosomes with the endogenous histones H3, H4, H2A and H2B. This assembly reaction is a gradual process that takes four to six hours for completion. Micrococcal nuclease digestions of the chromatin assembled under these conditions generate an extended series of DNA fragments that are, on average, multiples of 180 base-pairs. We have examined the effect of histone H1 in this system. Exogenous histone H1, when added at a molar ratio of H1 to nucleosome of 1:1 to 5:1, causes an increase in the micrococcal nuclease resistance of the chromatin without causing chromatin aggregation under these experimental conditions. Furthermore, the periodically arranged nucleosomes display longer internucleosome distances, and the average length of the nucleosome repeat is a function of the amount of histone H1 added, when this histone is present at the onset of the assembly process. In contrast, no major change in the length of the nucleosome repeat is observed when histone H1 is added at the end of the chromatin assembly process. Protein analyses of the purified minichromosomes show that histone H1 is incorporated in the chromatin that is assembled in the S-150 supplemented with histone H1. The amount of histone H1 bound to chromatin is a function of the total amount of histone H1 added. We define here the parameters that generate histone H1-containing chromatin with native nucleosome repeats from 160 to 220 base-pairs, and we discuss the implications of these studies.     

H1 histone exchange is limited to particular regions of chromatin that differ in aggregation properties

Chromatin fragments produced by mild nuclease digestion were chromatographed on Bio-Gel A-50m to give fractions ranging in size from 0.4 to 30 kilobase pair-DNA. The fragments that were larger than about 8-10 nucleosomes accounted for 80% of the chromatin, and the H1/core histone ratio was constant throughout these fractions. When adjusted to 150 mM NaCl, aggregates precipitated in each fraction, the largest fragments yielding 60% and the smallest 25%. In all of these fractions, after aggregation was induced by NaCl, the H1/core histone ratio in the aggregation-resistant chromatin (S) was 0.7 that in the aggregated chromatin (P). To show that the H1 deficiency and aggregation resistance were not produced by transfer of H1 from little fragments to bigger one, big aggregation-resistant fragments were incubated with little aggregation-prone fragments in 75 mM NaCl for 2 h, and readjusted to 150 mM. The little aggregation-prone fragments retained their aggregatibility after exposure to big aggregation-resistant fragments. By mixing [3H]P with [14C]S and vice versa, incubating at 75 mM NaCl for 2 h, and separating P from S with 150 mM NaCl, it was demonstrated that H1 histone did not equilibrate between S and P. Similarly, mixing combinations of radioactive and unlabeled, big and little, S and P fractions, and fractionating by size after 2 h or more incubation at 75 mM NaCl, it was shown that H1 equilibrates between different S fragments, and between different P fragments, but not between S and P. The distribution of H1 variants between S and P fractions was not correlated with the affinity of the variants for DNA. The order of binding affinities was H10 greater than H1ab = H1c, but the deficits of H1's in the aggregation-resistant S fractions were ranked H1ab greater than H1c greater than H10. It is suggested that chromatin is a mosaic of aggregation-resistant and aggregation-prone regions which differ in H1 content quantitatively and qualitatively.     

On the binding of histone H1 in chromatin

Nucleosomal subunits isolated from rabbit thymus nuclei in 0.04 M K₂SO₄-0.02 M Tris, pH 7.4 were devoid of histone H1, while whole chromatin prepared in the same buffer contained the full complement of histone H1. The question is asked why histone H1 dissociates from the subunits but not from the high molecular weight material. We propose that, at physiological salt concentrations, histone H1 is not bound to linker DNA as depicted in the current models; rather, alternate attachment sites, present only in the polymer, are involved.     

The dynamics of histone H1 function in chromatin

Over 80% of the nucleosomes in chromatin contain histone H1, a protein family known to affect the structure and activity of chromatin. Genetic studies and in vivo imaging experiments are changing the traditional view of H1 function and mechanism of action. H1 variants are partially redundant, mobile molecules that interact with nucleosomes as members of a dynamic protein network and serve as fine tuners of chromatin function.     

Distribution of H1 histone in chromatin digested by micrococcal nuclease.

The relative amount of H1 histone associated with isolated nucleosomes from calf thymus was determined as a function of the extent of DNA digestion by micrococcal nuclease. Generally the amount of H1 histone associated with mononucleosomes decreases with increasing digestion until 60% of the original H1 remains associated with DNA 150 base pirs or less in size. Coincidentally, H1 histone increases relative to the other histones in aggregated material that sediments through sucrose gradients to form a pellet. However, the level of H1 histone remains at control values for oligonucleosomes (dimer to hexamer) over the 30% digestion range studied. An increase in ionic strength to 0.3 M NaCl in the density gradient reveals a different pattern of H1 binding, whereby the amount of H1 reflects the average size of the DNA fragments with which it is associated. Although there is significant binding to nucleosomes per se, it appears that the major ionic involvement of H1 is with internucleosomal spacer DNA.     

Organization and expression of H1 histone and H1 replacement histone genes

The H1 family is the most divergent subgroup of the highly conserved class of histone proteins [Cole: Int J Pept Protein Res 30:433–449, 1987]. In several vertebrate species, the H1 complement comprises five or more subtypes, and tissue specific patterns of H1 histones have been described. The diversity of the H1 histone family raises questions about the functions of different H1 subtypes and about the differential control of expression of their genes. The expression of main type H1 genes is coordinated with DNA replication, whereas the regulation of synthesis of replacement H1 subtypes, such as H1° and H5, and the testis specific H1t appears to be more complex. The differential control of H1 gene expression is reflected in the chromosomal organization of the genes and in different promoter structures. This review concentrates on a comparison of the chromosomal organization of main type and replacement H1 histone genes and on the differential regulation of their expression. General structural and functional data, which apply to both H1 and core histone genes and which are covered by recent reviews, will not be discussed in detail.     

Modulation of chromatin function through linker histone H1 variants

In this review, the structural aspects of linker H1 histones are presented as a background for characterization of the factors influencing their function in animal and human chromatin. The action of H1 histone variants is largely determined by dynamic alterations of their intrinsically disordered tail domains, posttranslational modifications and allelic diversification. The interdependent effects of these factors can establish dynamic histone H1 states that may affect the organization and function of chromatin regions.     

Immunofractionation of chromatin regions associated with histone H1o

Two monoclonal antibodies, which were elicited against histone H5, bind to purified rat liver chromatin and to rat liver H1o but not to rat liver H1. The monoclonal antibodies were immobilized on CNBr-Sepharose and the resulting immunoaffinity column was used to fractionate rat liver oligonucleosomes. Enzyme-linked immunoabsorbant assay (ELISA) and immunoblotting experiments indicate that the nucleosomes bound to the column were tenfold enriched in their content of H1o. Oligonucleosomes, prepared from the livers of either untreated or 3-methylcholanthrene-treated adult rats, were fractionated on the anti-H1o affinity column. The DNA purified from the unfractionated nucleosomes, from the unbound nucleosomes and from the nucleosomes which were bound to the column was examined with various 32P-labeled probes. A slight enrichment in H1o was detected in the coding region of the rat albumin gene. In contrast DNA which was bound to the column was significantly depleted in sequences hybridizing with total cellular RNA (which contains mostly ribosomal RNA) and with sequences hybridizing to the 3'-terminal region of a cytochrome P-450 gene, which is inducible by the chemical carcinogen 3-methylcholanthrene, regardless of whether isolated from control or from carcinogen-treated rat livers. Our experiments clearly demonstrate that chromatin can be efficiently immunofractionated. The results suggest that the H1o content of chromatin regions containing genes which are constitutively transcribed is not necessarily different from that of regions containing non-transcribed genes and that highly inducible genes may be segregated into chromatin regions which are depleted of H1o.     

The ubiquitinated histone species are enriched in histone H1-depleted chromatin regions

Bovine thymus and trout testis chromatin were fractionated into regions which differed in their micrococcal nuclease accessibility and solubility properties, and the distribution of the ubiquitinated histone species among these chromatin regions was elucidated. Ubiquitinated (u) species of histones H2A and H2B were enriched in the nuclease-sensitive, low-ionic-strength, soluble fraction of both chromatins. These results indicate that the presence of ubiquitinated histones may alter nucleosome-nucleosome interactions and destabilize higher-order chromatin structures. Bovine thymus chromatin was separated into aggregation-resistant, salt-soluble and aggregation-prone, salt-insoluble chromatin fractions. The aggregation-resistant chromatin fraction depleted in H1 histones was enriched in uH2A and uH2B, with uH2B showing the greater enrichment. The chromatin fragments were also stripped and reconstituted with the H1 histones prior to fractionation. The results were the same as above: uH2A and uH2B were preferentially localized in the aggregation-resistant. H1-depleted chromatin fraction, suggesting that chromatin regions enriched in ubiquitinated histone species have a reduced affinity for the H1 histones. Thus, ubiquitinated histone species may be one of the contributing factors in the differential assembly of various parts of the genome.