Salbutamol: comparison of bronchodilating effect of inhaled powder and aerosol in asthmatic subjects.

In the treatment of asthma salbutamol can be administered as an aerosol with a metered-dose inhaler or as a powder with a breath-actuated device (Rotahaler). The two forms of the drug were compared in a double-blind placebo-controlled study involving 10 asthmatic adults who were known to respond to salbutamol. The bronchodilating effect of the aerosol and the powder at doses of 200 micrograms and of the powder at doses of 200 and 400 micrograms was compared, bronchodilation being measured in terms of forced expiratory volume and vital capacity. The response was far greater to salbutamol than to placebo, but there was no significant difference between the two forms of the drug or between the lower and higher doses of powder. No side effects were observed.     

Cytogenetic study in peripheral blood lymphocytes from asthmatic patients receiving continued therapy with theophylline.

Possible cytogenetic effects of theophylline have been investigated in asthmatic patients undergoing continuous therapy with this drug. Sister-chromatid exchanges (SCE), chromosome aberrations (CA) and proliferating rate indices (PRI) were evaluated in cultured peripheral blood lymphocytes from patients receiving theophylline alone, theophylline plus inhaled beta 2 adrenergic drugs or theophylline in combination with beta 2 adrenergic agents and corticoids. Two samples from each individual were obtained in order to perform a prospective study: before the theophylline medication (sample A) and at a time after the beginning of treatment (sample B). After treatment (66.3 +/- 37.8 days), an increase in SCE was observed without modifications either in PRI or in CA. Patients receiving beta 2 adrenergics or beta 2 adrenergics plus glucocorticoids before and during theophylline treatment, did not respond differently than those on theophylline alone.     

Double-blind Randomized Cross-over Trial of Nocturnal Elixir Theophylline Supplementation of a Twice-daily Sustained-Release Theophylline Tablet Formulation in Asthmatic Patients

Sixteen asthmatic patients with normal diurnal activity between 05:00 and 23:00 h participated in this randomized, multiple-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of evening supplementation of a 12-hourly sustained-release theophylline (SRT) regimen with a nonsustained-release theophylline (NSRT) formulation. The treatments were Nuelin SA (SRT) every 12 h plus, in the evening, either placebo or an additional dose of Nuelin liquid (NSRT), determined to raise the early morning (0300) plasma theophylline concentration (PTC) to 18 μ/ml by using the dose-concentration prediction equation established in a study conducted on healthy volunteers and reported in this journal. The 11-day trial included two 24-h inpa-tient periods during which PTCs and lung functions (PEF, FEV, FEF_25-75, and FVC) were determined every 2 h. The value of the prediction equation was confirmed when the early morning PTC, after evening supplementation with Nuelin Liquid, was raised nearly to the targeted 18 μg/ml. The nocturnal peak-to-trough fluctuation in PTC was larger during additional treatment with Nuelin liquid, but the nocturnal peak-to-trough fluctuation in lung function parameters decreased. Overall, airflow during the early morning hours (0100-0500) significantly improved during this chronotherapeutically optimized treatment of adding an NSRT product to the evening dose of a 12-hourly SRT regimen. Key Words: Nocturnal asthma—Chronotherapy—Sustained-release theophylline—Nonsustained-release theophylline—Forced vital capacity—Forced expiratory volume— Forced expiratory flow—Peak expiratory flow—Area under the maximum expiratory flow-volume curve.     

Effects of bronchodilator particle size in asthmatic patients using monodisperse aerosols.

Aerosol particle size influences airway drug deposition. Current inhaler devices are inefficient, delivering a heterodisperse distribution of drug particle sizes where, at best, 20% reaches the lungs. Monodisperse aerosols are the appropriate research tools to investigate basic aerosol science concepts within the human airways. We hypothesized that engineering such aerosols of albuterol would identify the ideal bronchodilator particle size, thereby optimizing inhaled therapeutic drug delivery. Eighteen stable mildly to moderately asthmatic patients [mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 74.3% of predicted] participated in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study design. A spinning-top aerosol generator was used to produce monodisperse albuterol aerosols that were 1.5, 3, and 6 microm in size, and also a placebo, which were inhaled at cumulative doses of 10, 20, 40, and 100 microg. Lung function changes and tolerability effects were determined. The larger particles, 6 and 3 microm, were significantly more potent bronchodilators than the 1.5-microm and placebo aerosols for FEV1 and for the forced expiratory flow between exhalation of 25 and 75% of forced vital capacity. A 20-microg dose of the 6- and 3-microm aerosols produced FEV1 bronchodilation comparable to that produced by 200 microg from a metered-dose inhaler. No adverse effects were observed in heart rate and plasma potassium. The data suggest that in mildly to moderately asthmatic patients there is more than one optimal beta2-agonist bronchodilator particle size and that these are larger particles in the higher part of the respirable range. Aerosols delivered in monodisperse form can enable large reductions of the inhaled dose without loss of clinical efficacy.     

Bronchodilatory properties of 2-decarboxy-2-hydroxymethyl prostaglandin E1

We evaluated in a double-blind study the bronchodilatory properties of 2-decarboxy-2-hydroxymethyl prostaglandin E1 (PGE1-carbinol), described recently as a nonirritant bronchodilator in animals. Fifteen asthmatic patients received by inhalation single doses of 1, 10, and 30 micrograms PGE1-carbinol, 55 micrograms PGE2, and placebo (10% ethanol in normal saline, which was also used as diluent for the PGs). Such pulmonary function tests as forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, and maximal expiratory flow were monitored during 2 hours following inhalation of each compound. 10 and 30 micrograms PGE1-carbinol produced significant but short-acting bronchodilation, similar to that caused by 55 micrograms PGE2. One-third of the patients reported mild cough and throat irritation during and shortly after inhalation of 30 micrograms PGE1-carbinol or 55 micrograms PGE2. Placebo and 1 microgram PGE1-carbinol produced minimal side effects, but neither agent caused bronchodilation. In an adjunctive, unblinded trial, the same patients received 400 micrograms fenoterol. Fenoterol caused greater bronchodilation 15 and 30 minutes after inhalation than did the PGs in the double-blind study.     

Bronchodilatory properties of 2-decarboxy-2-hydroxymethyl prostaglandin E1

We evaluated in a double-blind study the bronchodilatory properties of 2-decarboxy-2-hydroxymethyl prostaglandin E₁ (PGE₁-carbinol), described recently as a nonirritant bronchodilator in animals. Fifteen asthmatic patients received by inhalation single doses of 1, 10, and 30 μg PGE₁-carbinol, 55 μg PGE₂, and placebo (10% ethanol in normal saline, which was also used as diluent for the PGs). Such pulmonary function tests as forced expiratory volume in 1 second, forced vital capacity, and maximal expiratory flow were monitored during 2 hours following inhalation of each compound. 10 and 30 μg PGE₁-carbinol produced significant but short-acting bronchodilation, similar to that caused by 55 μg PGE₂. One-third of the patients reported mild cough and throat irritation during and shortly after inhalation of 30 μg PGE₁-carbinol or 55 μg PGE₂. Placebo and 1 μg PGE₁-carbinol produced minimal side effects, but neither agent caused bronchodilation. In an adjunctive, unblinded trial, the same patients received 400 μg fenoterol. Fenoterol caused greater bronchodilation 15 and 30 minutes after inhalation than did the PGs in the double-blind study.     

Dose response relation to oral theophylline in severe chronic obstructive airways disease.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate measurement of the trapped gas volume as a measure of respiratory function in patients with chronic obstructive airways disease and their response to treatment with theophylline. DESIGN--Patients able to produce consistent results on testing of respiratory function spent two weeks having dosage of theophylline adjusted to give individual pharmacokinetic data. This was followed by random assignment to four consecutive two month treatment periods--placebo and low, medium, and high dose, as assessed by serum concentrations of theophylline. Respiratory function and exercise performance was assessed at the end of each two month period. SETTING--Chest unit in district hospital. PATIENTS--Thirty eight patients with chronic bronchitis and moderate to severe chronic obstruction to airflow were recruited; 33 aged 53-73 years completed the study. INTERVENTIONS--Dosage of oral theophylline increased during two week optimisation period to 800 mg daily unless toxicity was predicted, when 400 mg was given. Targets for the steady state serum theophylline concentrations were 5-10 mg/l in the low dose period, 10-15 mg/l in the medium dose, and 15-20 mg/l in the high dose period. ENDPOINTS--Respiratory function as measured by forced expiratory volume in one second, forced vital capacity, peak expiratory flow rate, slow vital capacity, and static lung volumes using helium dilution and body plethysmography from which trapped gas volume was derived. Exercise performance assessed by six minute walking test and diary cards using visual analogue scale. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--The forced expiratory volume in one second, forced vital capacity, and peak expiratory flow rate changed only slightly (about 13%) over the range of doses. There was a linear dose dependent fall of trapped gas volume from 1.84 l (SE 0.157) to 1.42 l (0.152), 1.05 l (0.128), and 0.67 l (0.102) during the placebo and low, medium, and high dose treatment periods. Mean walking distance increased by up to 55.6 m (20%). There was a modest improvement in dyspnoea as the dose of theophylline was increased. Side effects were mostly minor but they became more frequent as the dose was increased. CONCLUSION--The fall in trapped gas volume may reflect an improvement in peripheral ventilation (associated with treatment with theophylline) which is less apparent in the more common tests of lung function used in patients with chronic obstructive airways disease.     

Treatment of nocturnal asthma: the role of sustained-release theophylline and oral beta-2-mimetics

In two double-blind, multiple-dose cross-over studies the therapeutic effects of SR theophylline preparations given once each night (mean 11.2 mg/kg per day) versus twice daily in equal doses (mean 10.3 mg/kg per day) (study I) and SR-terbutaline in equal doses (mean 0.25 mg/kg per day) versus SR theophylline in unequally divided daily doses (mean 5.3 mg/kg morning dose, 10.6 mg/kg evening dose) study II) were compared in 19 patients with nocturnal asthma. At the end of each treatment period drug serum concentrations and PEFR were measured every 2 hr over a 24-hr period. With the twice-daily, equally divided regimen, serum theophylline concentrations were lower at night than during the day (mean 9.4 +/- 0.9 versus 11.3 +/- 1.0 mg/l). With the single evening administration, serum theophylline concentrations were considerably higher at night (Cmax 16.3 +/- 1.4 mg/l) and the circadian variation of PEFR was significantly reduced. PEFR was higher during night and early morning (283 +/- 14 versus 217 +/- 11 l/min, P less than 0.005). During daytime in study II, PEFR values were slightly higher with theophylline than terbutaline. There was no significant difference in peak flow between either treatment during the night and early morning. However, additional use of inhaled beta-2-mimetics because of asthmatic attacks occurred more often during terbutaline (79 times in 8/10 patients) than theophylline treatment (29 times in 5/10 patients). Symptom scores, number of attacks and side-effects clearly favor the theophylline regimen. We conclude that for patients with nocturnal asthma a once-nightly dose of SR theophylline can be sufficient for stabilization of the airways.     

Treatment of Nocturnal Asthma: the Role of Sustained-Release Theophylline and Oral β-2-Mimetics

In two double-blind, multiple-dose cross-over studies the therapeutic effects of SR theophylline preparations given once each night (mean 11.2mg/kg per day) versus twice daily in equal doses (mean 10.3 mg/kg per day) (study I) and SR-terbutaline in equal doses (mean 0.25 mg/kg per day) versus SR theophylline in unequally divided daily doses (mean 5.3 mg/kg morning dose, 10.6 mg/kg evening dose) study II) were compared in 19 patients with nocturnal asthma. At the end of each treatment period drug serum concentrations and PEFR were measured every 2 hr over a 24-hr period. With the twice-daily, equally divided regimen, serum theophylline concentrations were lower at night than during the day (mean 9.4 ±0.9 versus 11.3± 1.0mg/l). With the single evening administration, serum theophylline concentrations were considerably higher at night (C_max16.3 ±1.4 mg/1) and the circadian variation of PEFR was significantly reduced. PEFR was higher during night and early morning (283 ±14 versus 217 ± 11 l/min, P< 0.005). During daytime in study II, PEFR values were slightly higher with theophylline than terbutaline. There was no significant difference in peak flow between either treatment during the night and early morning. However, additional use of inhaled β-2-mimetics because of asthmatic attacks occurred more often during terbutaline (79 times in 8/10 patients) than theophylline treatment (29 times in 5/10 patients). Symptom scores, number of attacks and side-effects clearly favor the theophylline regimen. We conclude that for patients with nocturnal asthma a once-nightly dose of SR theophylline can be sufficient for stabilization of the airways.     

Tolerance and cross-tolerance to theophylline-induced stimulation of locomotor activity in rats

Rats treated chronically with caffeine become tolerant to caffeine-induced stimulation of locomotor activity and cross-tolerant to theophylline. This study was performed to determine if the cross-tolerance between these two methylxanthine drugs is symmetrical. Symmetrical cross-tolerance produced by two different drugs implies a common underlying mechanism of action. Separate groups of rats were given scheduled access to drinking bottles containing either drug-free tap water or 1.0 mg/ml theophylline solution. Daily theophylline intake averaged 59 mg/kg. Dose-effect curves were determined in both control and theophylline-treated groups for 5 drugs: the methylxanthines theophylline and caffeine, a nonxanthine psychomotor stimulant, d-amphetamine, and the adenosine analogs R(-)-N6-2-(phenylisopropyl)adenosine and 5'-(N-ethyl)carboxamidoadenosine. All drugs were injected i.p. and locomotor activity was measured for 30 min beginning 35 min later. Rats that were maintained chronically on theophylline were completely tolerant to the locomotor activity stimulant effects of acutely administered theophylline and cross-tolerant to caffeine-induced stimulation of locomotor activity. In contrast, both control and treated groups were fully responsive to the stimulant effects of d-amphetamine. Low doses of the adenosine analogs produced stimulation of locomotor activity in both groups of rats. Higher doses produced a dose-dependent depression of locomotor activity in control rats; curves for the theophylline-treated rats were shifted to the right of the control curves. Thus, adenosine antagonist activity of theophylline remained evident at a time of complete tolerance to the stimulant effect of the drug on locomotor activity.     

Comparison of Beclomethasone Dipropionate Aerosol and Prednisolone in Reversible Airways Obstruction

This paper describes a double-bond crossover trial of prednisolone and beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol in 38 steroid-dependent patients with reversible diffuse airways obstruction. Altogether there was no difference in the patient''s preference of the two treatment groups or in the number of times they used their bronchodilator aerosol, or in the forced expiratory volume in one second, vital capacity, or peak expiratory flow rate in the two treatment groups. The plasma cortisol levels when the patients were on the aerosol were much higher than when they were on prednisolone. The use of inhaled aerosol steroids seems to be preferable as it eliminates the usual complications of oral steroid therapy.     

Bronchodilator Effect of Oral Salbutamol in Asthmatics Treated with Corticosteroids

In a double-blind trial the effect on ventilatory function of oral salbutamol (in two different doses) and a placebo were studied in 12 patients with chronic asthma receiving regular maintenance treatment with prednisolone. Salbutamol in a dose of 4 mg four times daily, given for a period of four weeks, produced a sustained and statistically significant increase in peak expiratory flow rate over the pretreatment recordings. This effect was not observed with a lower dose of salbutamol (2 mg four times daily) or with a placebo. Salbutamol in the higher dose would seem to be an effective and safe oral bronchodilator that can be recommended for the treatment of mild or moderate asthma. The duration of treatment in this study was, however, limited to four weeks, and it is not known whether effective bronchodilatation would be maintained if the drug were given for longer periods.     

Comparison of aerosol ipratropium bromide and salbutamol in chronic bronchitis and asthma.

The effects of inhaling 200 mu g of salbutamol were compared with those of inhaling 40 mu g of ipratropium bromide singly and in combination with salbutamol in eight patients with bronchitis and eight asthmatic patients in a double-blind controlled trial. Changes in airways resistance were assessed by measuring the forced expiratory volume in 1 second and specific airways conductance. Both drugs were significantly better in relieving airways obstruction than placebo. Salbutamol was significantly more effective than ipratropium bromide in patients with asthma, but in the patients with bronchitis there was no significant difference between salbutamol and ipratropium bromide. The combination of the two drugs produced a slightly greater and longer response than either drug alone but this was not significant.     

Administration-time-dependency of the pharmacokinetic behavior and therapeutic effect of a once-a-day theophylline in asthmatic children

Using a double-blind, placebo-control, crossover study design, 8 asthmatic children (8-15 years) were evaluated for temporal patterns in airways function throughout separate study periods when treatment was placebo or Theo-24 once-daily on separate occasions at 0600, 1500 or 2100 hr. During 39-hr in-hospital observations, pulmonary function and serum theophylline concentrations (STC) were assessed every 3 hr under all treatments. The pharmacokinetics of Theo-24 varied greatly depending on the dosing time. For the afternoon and evening dosings, the Cmax, Tmax, AUC, % swing, % fluctuation, % AUC fluctuation, % nocturnal excess and Cav(2-6 hr) were all statistically significantly greater than for the morning dosing. Compared with the placebo regimen, dosing patients with Theo-24 at 1500 hr disrupted circadian patterns of airways function, especially airways patency, while dosing at 2100 hr, reduced the amplitude and shifted the acrophase of several spirometric measures to a slightly earlier time. Theo-24 treatment irrespective of dosing time resulted in comparable enhancement of the group 24-hr mean, minimum and maximum values of airways patency with reference to placebo baselines. Theo-24 dosing at 1500 or 2100 hr, however, resulted in the best effect on the airways as assessed by the 24-hr mean FEV 1.0 level in 7 of the 8 asthmatic children. When the drug was given at 1500 hr, the time of lowest FEV 1.0 was shifted from the nighttime hours in 5 of 8 patients. These findings suggest that clinicians need to individualize the theophylline dosing schedule of patients to best control the symptoms of asthma.     

Mechanism of bronchodilator effect in chronic airflow limitation.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the mechanisms through which two bronchodilators (theophylline and salbutamol) influence dyspnea during daily activities. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with chronic airflow limitation participated in a multiple crossover, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. The effect of theophylline and salbutamol, alone or combined, on pulmonary function and dyspnea during daily activities was examined. Correlations of changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and maximum expiratory pressures (MIPs) (independent variables) and changes in dyspnea score during daily activities (dependent variable) were also examined. RESULTS: The two drugs proved to be beneficial the effects in general were additive rather than synergistic. The drugs improved the FEV1; theophylline significantly improved the MIPs. The correlation between the changes in FEV1 and those in dyspnea score, after adjustment for the changes in MIPs, was 0.55 (p less than 0.001). The correlation between the changes in MIPs and those in dyspnea score, after adjustment for the changes in FEV1, was 0.39 (p less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in airway calibre and in respiratory muscle strength play an independent and important role in dyspnea during daily activities in patients with chronic airflow limitation. Changes in airway calibre may be of greater importance.     

Prophylactic effect of cimetidine in duodenal ulcer disease.

Fifty-seven symptom-free patients with duodenal ulcer entered a double-blind trial to assess the prophylactic effect of cimetidine. Patients were randomly allocated to receive cimetidine 400 mg twice daily (29 patients) or placebo (28 patients). The trial was designed to imitate daily clinical practice, so duodenal ulcer disease was diagnosed by means of x-ray examination. Three patients from each group withdrew from the trial. All remaining patients continued to receive treatment for 12 months or until symptoms recurred. Three out of 26 patients suffered relapses during cimetidine treatment, compared with 20 out of 25 receiving placebo. No side effects were attributable to cimetidine. Long-term cimetidine treatment had no curative effect as relapses occurred soon after treatment was stopped. The estimated chance (cumulative remission rate +/- 2 SE) of remaining symptom-free 13 weeks after one year''s cimetidine treatment had been completed was 47 +/- 21%. Maintenance treatment with cimetidine is a suitable alternative to elective in surgery in patients with duodenal ulcer subjects frequent relapses. Further study is needed to establish the optimal duration and safety of prolonged cimetidine treatment.     

Beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol in allergic rhinitis.

Treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate aerosol (BDA), 50 mug four times daily in each nostril, was compared with placebo therapy in a double-blind non-crossover trial of 30 matched patients with allergic rhinitis induced by ragweed pollen. The trial was started at the beginning of the ragweed season and continued for 42 days. Response to treatment was assessed from information on daily diary cards, weekly objective measurements of nasal patency and measurement of total eosinophil count (TEC) before treatment and at week 4. Patients in the BDA group had significantly less (P less than 0.05) sneezing, rhinorrhea and nasal stuffiness at 36 days, cough at 10 days and antihistamine consumption at 17 days. There was no significant difference between the groups in eye symptoms, nasal airway inspiratory resistance, maximum inspiratory nasal flow or TEC. Overall comparison with previous pollen seasons by the patients indicated moderate to great improvement in 86% of the BDA group and in 13% of the placebo group (P less than 0.01). Minor side effects were noted by two patients in each group.     

Controlled trial of azathioprine in chronic ulcerative colitis.

A double-blind controlled trial of azathioprine in a dose of 2-2.5 mg/kg body weight over six months was conducted among 44 patients with active chronic ulcerative colitis. Three patients treated with placebo did not complete the trial because their disease became so severe that colectomy was performed. Among patients who completed the trial the mean dose of prednisolone necessary to control the disease decreased in those treated with azathioprine and those treated with placebo; the reduction was greater among those who took azathioprine (p less than 0.001). Activity of the disease apparently improved in both treatment groups but a significant (p less than 0.001) trend was observed only in those patients treated with azathioprine. No serious side effects from azathioprine occurred during the trial but seven of 24 patients had to stop the drug because of nausea. Azathioprine may have a role in the treatment of a few patients wih troublesome chronic colitis for whom conventional drug treatment is ineffectual, or for whom continuous systemic corticosteroid treatment is needed to control symptoms, and for whom surgical treatment is inappropriate.     

Therapeutic advantage of unequal dosing of theophylline in patients with nocturnal asthma

Two theophylline treatments were compared in a randomized, multiple-dose, crossover study on 20 patients present with nonallergic bronchial asthma. Both products (E = Euphyllin CR, A = Afonilum Retard) were capsules containing micropellets. They were administered according to the recommendations of the manufactures and differed in the total daily theophylline dose (642 mg versus 500 mg), the partition of this dose (1/3 in the morning and 2/3 in the evening versus equal amounts in the morning and evening) and the timing of the evening dose (2200 hr versus 2000 hr). The patients were off oral theophyllines at least 2 days prior to study onset and no other drugs were allowed to be administered during the testing periods. On the 4th day of each study period, serum theophylline concentrations (STC) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEF) were determined every 2 hr. Compared with the 24-hr PEF reference profile taken prior to study onset, both theophylline treatments produced a significantly higher 24-hr PEF average (mesor). Treatment E resulted in significantly higher mesor than A; in addition, the PEF amplitude relative to the mesor was reduced by treatment E when compared with placebo.