Risk factors and risk reduction of breast cancer

Because of its increasing incidence, breast cancer is a significant burden for women worldwide. In industrialized countries, breast cancer is the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women, and it is estimated that 1 in every 8 women will develop the disease during her lifetime. Sufficient evidence indicates that a number of genetic, environmental and lifestyle risk exposures during life may play important roles in the etiology of this disease. The purpose of this paper is to review some etiologic factors and underlying mechanisms in relation to breast cancer risk. Based on the published literature, there is sufficient evidence that some established factors are associated with breast cancer risk. Age, early age at menarche, late menopause, height, post-menopausal obesity, family history of breast cancer, ionizing radiation, oral contraceptives, hormonal replacement therapy, mammographic density, some gene mutations and clinical conditions, such as benign breast disease, are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. The risk decreases with early childbearing, high parity and physical activity, and breastfeeding. Alcohol increases the risk, while caloric restriction may confer protection from breast cancer. Epidemiological evidence for other nutritional factors is insufficient. These results suggest that breast cancer is a multifactorial disease where genetic susceptibility, environment, nutrition and other lifestyle risk factors interact. Better identification of modifiable risk factors and risk reduction of breast cancer may allow implementation of useful strategies for prevention.     

Oral Contraceptives and Breast Neoplasia: A Retrospective Study

Between 1 December 1968 and 31 December 1971 345 women aged 16-39 years with a lump in the breast (90 malignant and 255 benign) were interviewed at five London teaching hospitals together with 347 matched controls suffering from acute medical or surgical conditions or admitted to hospital for routine elective surgery. Questions were asked about each patient''s medical, obstetric, menstrual, contraceptive, and social histories.The data do not suggest that the use of oral contraceptives is related in any way to the risk of breast cancer but provide some evidence that the preparations may actually protect against benign breast disease. This protective effect is largely confined to women who continue to use oral contraceptives and have used them altogether for more than two years. Such women appear to have only about 25% as great a risk of being admitted to hospital for a breast biopsy as women who have never used oral contraceptives at all.     

DNA repair gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to familial breast cancer in a group of patients from Campinas, Brazil

Several studies have reported that the genes involved in DNA repair and in the maintenance of genome integrity play a crucial role in protecting against mutations that lead to cancer. Epidemiologic evidence has shown that the inheritance of genetic variants at one or more loci results in a reduced DNA repair capacity and in an increased risk of cancer. Polymorphisms have been identified in several DNA repair genes, such as XRCC1, XPD, XRCC3, and RAD51, but the influence of specific genetic variants on repair phenotype and cancer risk has not yet been clarified. This was a case-control study design with three case groups: 53 women with breast cancer and family history; 33 women with sporadic breast cancer; 175 women with no breast cancer but with family history. The control group included 120 women with no breast cancer and no family history. The PCR-RFLP method was used to analyze the XRCC1-Arg399Gln, XPD-Lys751Gln, XRCC3-Thr241Met, and RAD51-G135C polymorphisms. No statistically significant differences were found between the case groups and the control group for any of the polymorphisms analyzed, and also between the breast cancer and family history group and the sporadic breast cancer group. Sample sizes of women with breast cancer, whether familial or sporadic, were insufficient to show any small true differences between the groups, but we have to consider that currently there is no clear consensus with respect to the association of these polymorphisms with breast cancer risk. Considering the data available, it can be conjectured that if there is any risk association between these single-nucleotide polymorphisms and breast cancer, this risk will probably be minimal. The greater the risk associated with cancer, the smaller the sample size required to demonstrate this association, and the data of different studies are usually, therefore, more concordant.     

Influence of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy on an estrogen metabolite biomarker of risk for breast cancer.

Whether postmenopausal hormone-replacement therapy (HRT) increases the risk of breast cancer remains controversial, despite numerous epidemiological studies. We approached the question from a biochemical rather than an epidemiological direction - we hypothesized that if estrogen administration increases the risk of breast cancer, it should also alter a known estrogen biomarker of risk towards what has been observed in patients who already have breast cancer. The specific biomarker we studied was the ratio of the urinary excretion of two principal estradiol metabolites, 2-hydroxyestrone and 16 alpha-hydroxyestrone, which is markedly decreased in women with breast cancer and women with familial risk for breast cancer. We studied 34 healthy postmenopausal women not on HRT and 19 women on HRT (Premarin 0.625 mg daily plus Provera, 2.5 mg daily, in women with a uterus and Premarin alone in women without a uterus); treatment duration ranged from 3 months to 15 years. We also studied four women with recently diagnosed, untreated breast cancer. The women with breast cancer showed a significantly lower 2-hydroxyestrone to 16 alpha-hydroxyestrone ratio than control women on HRT (1.35 +/- 0.13 vs. 2.71 +/- 0.84; p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in the metabolite ratio between healthy women on HRT and women not on HRT (2.82 +/- 0.92 vs. 2.71 +/- 0.84). There was no significant difference between women receiving Premarin alone and women receiving Premarin plus Provera (2.46 +/- 0.84 vs. 3.13 +/- 0.90), and neither differed significantly from women not on HRT (2.71 +/- 0.84). The finding that the ratio of women on HRT was not decreased to or toward the ratio in women with breast cancer can be interpreted, we believe, as a suggestive item of biochemical evidence that HRT is not a risk for breast cancer.     

A current perspective on genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer: the oral contraceptive decision

A clinician faces a problem in how best to counsel the woman with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer about her options for pregnancy prevention. The physician must guide her as she makes new and complex decisions. Recent data strongly support an amplified effect of the estrogens in oral contraceptives for the woman with a genetic risk for breast cancer. Nonetheless, a woman's immediate need to prevent pregnancy may be much more important to her than worrying about the long-term risk of breast cancer. Another factor is that oral contraceptives prevent ovarian cancer, so the physician may wish to prescribe them to protect her from ovarian cancer. In some genetic backgrounds, however, oral contraceptives not only do not prevent ovarian cancer, but they may raise the risk of breast cancer so significantly that they should not be taken. With other genetic backgrounds, oral contraceptives will protect the woman from ovarian cancer without much effect on her breast cancer risk. When does each of these cancer risks or benefits become significant? The clinician can provide an important benefit to a woman who must prevent pregnancy yet worries about her cancer risk. The physician can help her evaluate the evidence, with its gaps and uncertainties, in the context of her own preferences. To assist in this evaluation, this decision aid provides base-line estimates of the cancer risk that accompanies each of a woman's options. In some cases, genetic testing is likely to provide valuable information as she makes choices about contraception and the risks vs. benefits of different alternatives available to her.     

The evolution of nonsteroidal antiestrogens to become selective estrogen receptor modulators

The discovery of the first nonsteroidal antiestrogen ethamoxytriphetol (MER25) in 1958, opened the door to a wide range of clinical applications. However, the finding that ethamoxytriphetol was a “morning after” pill in laboratory animals, energized the pharmaceutical industry to discover more potent derivatives. In the wake of the enormous impact of the introduction of the oral contraceptive worldwide, contraceptive research was a central focus in the early 1960’s. Numerous compounds were discovered e.g., clomiphene, nafoxidine, and tamoxifen, but the fact that clinical studies showed no contraceptive actions, but, in fact, induced ovulation, dampened enthusiasm for clinical development. Only clomiphene moved forward to pioneer an application to induce ovulation in subfertile women. The fact that all the compounds were antiestrogenic made an application in patients to treat estrogen responsive breast cancer, an obvious choice. However, toxicities and poor projected commercial returns severely retarded clinical development for two decades. In the 1970’s a paradigm shift in the laboratory to advocate long term adjuvant tamoxifen treatment for early (non-metastatic) breast cancer changed medical care and dramatically increased survivorship. Tamoxifen pioneered that paradigm shift but it became the medicine of choice in a second paradigm shift for preventing breast cancer during the 1980’s and 1990’s. This was not surprising as it was the only medicine available and there was laboratory and clinical evidence for the eventual success of this application. Tamoxifen is the first medicine to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to reduce the risk of breast cancer in women at high risk. But it was the re-evaluation of the toxicology of tamoxifen in the 1980’s and the finding that there was both carcinogenic potential and a significant, but small, risk of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women that led to a third paradigm shift to identify applications for selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulation. This idea was to establish a new group of medicines now called selective ER modulators (SERMs). Today there are 5 SERMs FDA approved (one other in Europe) for applications ranging from the reduction of breast cancer risk and osteoporosis to the reduction of menopausal hot flashes and improvements in dyspareunia and vaginal lubrication. This article charts the origins of the current path for progress in women’s health with SERMs.     

Polymorphisms in the folate-metabolizing genes MTR, MTRR, and CBS and breast cancer risk

Alterations in the nucleotide sequences of folate-metabolizing genes can increase the risk of malignant transformation. The aim of our study was to investigate the association of three single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the folate-metabolizing genes - A2756G MTR, A66G MTRR, and 844ins68 CBS - which have putative functional significance in breast cancer risk. The allele and genotype frequencies of the SNPs were determined in a case group (840 women with sporadic breast cancer) and a control group (770 women). No statistically significant association of studied SNPs with breast cancer was revealed. A meta-analysis, which included data obtained from the literature and the present research, did not reveal any statistically significant associations of these SNPs with breast cancer. The results obtained provide evidence that these SNPs are not involved in the development of breast cancer.     

Breast cancer and oral contraceptives: findings in Oxford-Family Planning Association contraceptive study.

Among the 17 032 women taking part in the Oxford-Family Planning Association contraceptive study, 72 were first diagnosed as having breast cancer between the date they were admitted to the study and 1 September 1980. The relative risk of developing the disease in women who had used oral contraceptives in comparison with those who had never used them was estimated to be 0.96 (95% confidence limits 0.59 to 1.63). Among women aged under 35 years, the corresponding relative risk (based on only 14 women with breast cancer) was estimated to be 0.61. No relation was apparent between the risk of developing breast cancer and duration of oral-contraceptive use or interval since first oral-contraceptive use in any age group. The data in this study are thus reassuring; but observations based on women with long-term use of oral contraceptives, especially those starting to use the preparations at an early age, are few.     

Breast implants and cancer: causation, delayed detection, and survival

Concern for many women with breast implants has been focused on three topics: cancer (both breast and other cancers), delayed detection of breast cancer, and increased breast cancer recurrence or decreased length of survival. In this study, a qualitative review of the literature on these subjects was conducted, coupled with a meta-analysis of the risk for breast cancer or other cancers (excluding that of the breast). Researchers have consistently found no persuasive evidence of a causal association between breast implants and any type of cancer. The meta-analysis results obtained by combining the epidemiology studies support the overall conclusion that breast implants do not pose any additional risk for breast cancer (relative risk, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.85) or for other cancers (relative risk, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.87 to 1.24). This analysis suggests that breast implants may confer a protective effect against breast cancer. Women with implants should be reassured by the consistency of scientific studies which have uniformly determined that, compared with women without implants, they are not at increased risk for cancer, are not diagnosed with later-stage breast malignancies, are not at increased risk for breast cancer recurrence, and do not have a decreased length of survival.     

An epidemiological study of oral contraceptives and breast cancer

During 1968-77, 707 women aged 16-50 years with newly diagnosed breast cancer and 707 matched controls were interviewed at eight teaching hospitals in London and Oxford about their use of oral contraceptives. Eighty-six of the patients with breast cancer were matched with controls with gall-bladder disease; these subjects were omitted from the main analyses, which thus related to 621 case-control pairs.The results were reassuring. A few statistically significant differences in oral contraceptive use were found between the breast cancer and control groups, but the data were subdivided in many ways, so that some “significant” differences would have been expected to occur by chance. The only subgroup in which the evidence for a positive association between pill use and breast cancer was at all convincing comprised women aged 46-50 years, but trends in those aged 41-45 were by and large in the opposite direction and results of combined analysis gave no cause for concern.Information on clinical stage was available for 487 patients with breast cancer treated before the end of 1975. Those who had never used oral contraceptives had appreciably more advanced tumours at presentation than those who had been using the pill during the year before detection of the lump, while past users of the pill occupied an intermediate position. This difference in staging was reflected in the pattern of survival. Oral contraceptives may have had a beneficial effect on tumour growth and spread, though diagnostic bias could not be definitely excluded.     

Comparison of the proliferative effects of ethinylestradiol on human breast cancer cells in an intermittent and a continuous dosing regime.

Many women would prefer fewer bleeding episodes while taking oral contraceptives. For this reason and with the intention of reducing menstruation-associated symptoms, an extended-cycle contraceptive is considered in the present paper. However, it remains unknown whether this long-term treatment is associated with a different breast cancer risk from that of the usual treatment. Therefore, in the present in vitro work we intend to compare the effect of these different treatment regimens on breast cancer risk. MCF-7 cells (human estrogen- and progesterone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer cells) and HCC1500 cells (human estrogen- and progesterone-receptor-positive primary breast cancer cells) were incubated with physiological concentrations of ethinylestradiol (EE). Usual and extended cycles were mimicked by incubation periods of 18 hours with EE followed by 6 hours without EE and 24 hours with EE for 3 days, respectively. In both cell lines, EE elicited a significant increase in the proliferation rate. No significant difference was found between the two incubation periods. Our results indicate that continuously administered ethinylestradiol may not increase breast cancer risk in comparison to intermittent application. However, clinical studies are necessary to prove these in vitro results.     

Breast reduction surgery and breast cancer risk: does reduction mammaplasty have a role in primary prevention strategies for women at high risk of breast cancer?

Prophylactic bilateral mastectomy has been demonstrated to reduce breast cancer incidence in women with a high inherited susceptibility to breast cancer. For the majority of high-risk women, however, bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is not an acceptable option for primary prevention of breast cancer. Several epidemiological follow-up studies have indicated that there may be a substantial reduction in breast cancer risk among women who have undergone breast reduction surgery. The authors reviewed the evidence from these studies, with emphasis on the problems inherent in interpreting the results of nonexperimental studies of elective medical procedures. Although such observational studies cannot demonstrate definitively that reduction mammaplasty reduces the risk of breast cancer, the evidence from these studies is sufficiently strong to warrant the evaluation of breast reduction surgery as an option for primary prevention in clinical studies of women at increased risk of breast cancer. The availability of a more acceptable surgical option for primary prevention of breast cancer could increase the number of women willing to choose risk reduction surgery and thus may result in an overall reduction in breast cancer mortality among high-risk women.     

Bilateral breast cancer in northern Alberta: risk factors and survival patterns.

Of 2231 women with stage I, II or III breast cancer who were registered and seen between 1971 and 1979 and followed to the end of 1981, 48 (2.2%) had synchronous and 58 (2.6%) asynchronous bilateral breast cancer. The unadjusted incidence rate for a second breast cancer was 6.4/1000 breast-years at risk, compared with a rate of 0.70 for the risk of a first breast cancer in women. When calculated from the date of diagnosis of the first breast cancer the survival rate was better for the group with asynchronous disease than for the group with synchronous disease or for a group with unilateral disease, but when calculated from the date of diagnosis of the second cancer the rate was the same in all three groups. Comparison of known risk factors showed a significant association between the development of bilateral cancer and a later age at the birth of the first child and a longer interval between menarche and that birth. There was a trend towards greater age and more stage III cancer in the group with synchronous disease. There was no correlation between receiving radiotherapy for the first breast cancer and development of the second cancer. Annual mammography and clinical examination of asymptomatic women at a cancer centre resulted in the detection of a significantly higher proportion of minimal breast cancers in the second breast compared with the first. Such screening practices should be even more valuable in the earlier detection of unilateral breast cancer in asymptomatic women who have not had breast cancer.     

The relationship between breast cancer and augmentation mammaplasty: an epidemiologic study

Surgical implantation of breast prostheses for cosmetic purposes has become increasingly popular, and by 1981, it was estimated that three-quarters of a million women had had such an operation. The long-term potential risks, particularly of breast cancer, of such procedures have not been properly investigated. To evaluate the potential breast cancer risk, we have conducted a retrospective cohort study of 3111 women followed through various public and medical records for a total of 18,476 person-years, with a median of 6.2 years per person. The cases of breast cancer were detected by means of a computerized match with the Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program, a population-based cancer registry. Overall, 15.7 breast cancer cases were expected and 9 were observed, a nonsignificant deficit [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) = 57 percent, 95 percent confidence limits: 26 percent, 109 percent]. The cancers were generally diagnosed at an early stage. Among the 573 women aged 40 or older at implantation, 7.1 cases were expected and 8 were observed (SIR = 113 percent). In women whose implants were performed before the age of 40, only 1 case was observed whereas 8.6 cases were expected (SIR = 12 percent, 95 percent confidence limits: 0.3 percent, 65 percent), a significant difference. These data do not support an increased risk of breast cancer following augmentation mammaplasty. The low breast cancer rate in women having augmentation mammaplasty at a young age that many such women may have a reduced amount of breast tissue, but data on this are unavailable.     

Endogenous oestrogens and breast cancer risk in premenopausal and postmenopausal women

Breast cancer risk is strongly related to several reproductive and hormonal factors, but the nature of the effects of endogenous oestrogens has been difficult to establish. Data are now available from several large prospective studies with biobanks of stored serum, enabling better characterization of the associations of endogenous oestrogens, and other endogenous hormones, with breast cancer risk. In postmenopausal women, relatively high serum concentrations of oestradiol are associated with a more than twofold increase in the risk for breast cancer, and this probably explains the increase in risk in obese postmenopausal women. In premenopausal women the data available on oestrogens are more limited and difficult to interpret due to the large variations in endogenous oestrogens during the menstrual cycle, but are compatible with a positive association between oestradiol and breast cancer risk. There is also evidence that breast cancer risk is positively associated with androgens, prolactin and insulin-like growth factor-I. Further data are required, with better assays and repeat measures, to provide more accurate estimates of risk and to clarify the role of oestrogens in premenopausal women and the roles of other endogenous hormones.     

Risk assessment issues in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy affecting women, and its incidence has been increasing in many countries. The aetiology of breast cancer is poorly understood, so there is concern as to which factors in our environment or lifestyle are responsible for the increase. There is a need for reliable risk assessment, which involves the steps of hazard identification, hazard evaluation, exposure evaluation and risk estimation. Short-term laboratory tests and long-term tests in animals are useful for priority-setting, but quantitative human risk assessment should preferably involve observations of humans. Epidemiological studies vary in the degree of reliance that can be placed on their results. The main types of epidemiological investigation are illustrated by recent examples from the literature on breast cancer. Careful judgement is required in assessing whether any association between a factor and a disease is likely to be causal. The injectable contraceptive, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA, ‘Depo-Provera’), has been controversial because it caused malignant mammary tumours in beagle dogs. Two recent case-control studies found no overall association between DMPA and the risk of breast cancer in women. There was some evidence of increased risk in certain sub-groups of women, which could be interpreted with more confidence if there were a better understanding of the biology of human breast cancer. Nevertheless, the results do not support the prediction from beagle experiments that DMPA might increase the overall risk of breast cancer.     

CAG repeat variants in the POLG1 gene encoding mtDNA polymerase-gamma and risk of breast cancer in African-American women

The DNA polymerase-gamma (POLG) gene, which encodes the catalytic subunit of enzyme responsible for directing mitochondrial DNA replication in humans, contains a polyglutamine tract encoded by CAG repeats of varying length. The length of the CAG repeat has been associated with the risk of testicular cancer, and other genomic variants that impact mitochondrial function have been linked to breast cancer risk in African-American (AA) women. We evaluated the potential role of germline POLG-CAG repeat variants in breast cancer risk in a sample of AA women (100 cases and 100 age-matched controls) who participated in the Women's Circle of Health Study, an ongoing multi-institutional, case-control study of breast cancer. Genotyping was done by fragment analysis in a blinded manner. Results from this small study suggest the possibility of an increased risk of breast cancer in women with minor CAG repeat variants of POLG, but no statistically significant differences in CAG repeat length were observed between cases and controls (multivariate-adjusted odds ratio 1.74; 95% CI, 0.49-6.21). Our study suggests that POLG-CAG repeat length is a potential risk factor for breast cancer that needs to be explored in larger population-based studies.     

Frequent chest X-ray fluoroscopy and breast cancer incidence among tuberculosis patients in Massachusetts

The incidence of breast cancer was determined in 4940 women treated for tuberculosis between 1925 and 1954 in Massachusetts. Among 2573 women examined by X-ray fluoroscopy an average of 88 times during lung collapse therapy and followed for an average of 30 years, 147 breast cancers occurred in contrast to 113.6 expected [observed/expected (O/E) = 1.29; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-1.5]. No excess of breast cancer was seen among 2367 women treated by other means: 87 observed versus 100.9 expected. Increased rates for breast cancer were not apparent until about 10 to 15 years after the initial fluoroscopy examination. Excess risk then remained high throughout all intervals of follow-up, up to 50 years after first exposure. Age at exposure strongly influenced the risk of radiation-induced breast cancer with young women being at highest risk and those over age 40 being at lowest risk [relative risk (RR) = 1.06]. Mean radiation dose to the breast was estimated to be 79 cGy, and there was strong evidence for a linear relationship between dose and breast cancer risk. Allowing for a 10-year minimum latent period, the relative risk at 1 Gy was estimated as 1.61 and the absolute excess as 10.7 per 10(4) woman-years per gray. When compared to other studies, our data suggest that the breast is one of the most sensitive tissues to the carcinogenic force of radiation, that fractionated exposures are similar to single exposures of the same total dose in their ability to induce breast cancer, that risk remains high for many years after exposure, and that young women are especially vulnerable to radiation injury.     

口服避孕药对中国女性乳腺癌发病风险影响的Meta分析

目的：评价口服避孕药对中国女性乳腺癌发病率的影响。方法：计算机及手动检索中国知网,万方,维普,中国生物医学文献数据库,纳入有关口服避孕药对乳腺癌发病影响的研究。在评价纳入研究的方法学质量和提取有效数据后,采用ReviewManager5．0进行Meta分析。结果：共纳入19篇病例对照研究,包括例5051患者和6023例对照。Meta分析结果显示：乳腺癌病例组比对照组有着较高的口服避孕药暴露比。结论：口服避孕药可能会增加中国女性乳腺癌的发病风险。     

The possible role of lipid peroxidation in breast cancer risk

Breast cancer remains the commonest cause of death from cancer in women in most of the Western world. There is considerable evidence that breast cancer risk is influenced by environmental factors and can therefore potentially be modified. In this paper we describe evidence suggesting a relationship of lipid peroxidation to breast cancer risk, and propose that the method used to generate this information might usefully be applied to other disease states, and make some suggestions for further work. We have compared the urinary excretion of the mutagen malonaldehyde (MDA) in premenopausal women at different risks for breast cancer as determined by the appearance of the breast parenchyma on mammography. MDA was measured in 24-h urine samples from both groups and excretion in 30 women with mammographic dysplasia (high risk) was found to be approximately double that of 16 women without these radiological changes (p less than 0.02). These results suggest that mammographic dysplasia may be associated with lipid peroxidation. Further study of environmental factors associated with states that precede the development of breast and other cancers may lead to the identification of factors that can be modified and that may prevent the development of malignant disease.