Simultaneous interaction of actin with alpha-actinin and calponin

Interaction of calponin and alpha-actinin with actin was analyzed by means of cosedimentation and electron microscopy. G-actin was polymerized in the presence of calponin, alpha-actinin, or both of these actin-binding proteins (ABPs). The single and bundled actin filaments were separated, and the stoichiometry of ABPs and actin in both types of filaments was determined. Binding of calponin to the single or bundled actin filaments was not dependent on the presence of alpha-actinin and did not displace alpha-actinin from actin. In the presence of calponin, however, less alpha-actinin was bound to the bundled actin filaments, and the binding of alpha-actinin was accompanied by a partial decrease in the calponin/actin stoichiometry in the bundles of actin filaments. Calponin had no influence on the binding of alpha-actinin to the single actin filaments. The structure of actin bundles formed in the presence of the two ABPs differed from that formed in the presence of either one singly. We conclude that calponin and alpha-actinin can coexist on actin and that nearly each actin monomer can bind one of these ABPs.     

Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent polymerization of actin by myelin basic protein

The interaction between myelin basic protein (MBP) and G-actin was studied under nonpolymerizing conditions, i.e.,2mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 0.1 mM CaCl2 and 0.2 mM ATP. Fluorescence studies using pyrenyl-actin and the measurements of ATP hydrolysis rate show that MBP induces changes in the structure of the actin monomer similar to those occurring during polymerization by salt. Electron microscope observations of the MBP-G-actin complex reveal the presence of filamentous structures which appear as separate filaments or as bundles of filaments in lateral association. These filaments are polar as visualized by attachment of heavy meromyosin. The biochemical data together with electron microscope observations suggest that the binding of MBP to G-actin under non-polymerizing conditions induces an interaction between actin monomers leading to the formation of filamentous structures which may be similar to F-actin filaments. The effects of MBP on G-actin can be reversed by calmodulin in the presence of Ca2+.     

The gelsolin:calponin complex nucleates actin filaments with distinct morphologies

Gelsolin and calponin are cytoskeletal and signalling proteins that form a tight 1:1 complex (GCC). We show that calponin within the GCC inhibits the rate of gelsolin mediated nucleation of actin polymerization. The actin-binding function of calponin is ablated within the GCC as the actin-binding site overlaps with one of the gelsolin binding sites. The structure of filaments that result from nucleation by GCC are different to those nucleated by gelsolin alone in that they are longer, loosely bundled and stain heterogeneously with phalloidin. GCC nucleated filaments appear contorted and wrap around each to form the loose bundles.     

Bidirectional polymerization of G-actin on the human erythrocyte membrane

The directional polymerization of actin on the erythrocyte membrane has been examined at various concentrations of G-actin by thin-section electron microscopy. For this purpose, a new experimental system using single-layered erythrocyte membranes with the cytoplasmic surfaces freely exposed was developed. The preformed actin filaments did not bind with the cytoplasmic surface of the erythrocyte membranes. When the erythrocyte membranes were incubated at low concentrations (0.3 and 0.5 microM) of G-actin, greater than 80% of polymerized actin filaments pointed toward the membranes mainly in an end-on fashion, as judged by arrowhead formation with heavy meromyosin. At higher concentrations (2 and 4 microM) of G-actin, about half of the polymerized actin filaments were directed with arrowheads pointing toward the membranes, while the rest of the filaments showed the opposite polarity pointing away from the membranes. The majority of polymerized actin filaments formed loops at the points of attachment to the membranes. In contrast, when G-actin (2 and 4 microM) in the presence of cytochalasin B was polymerized into filaments, approximately 70% showed the polarity pointing away from the membrane mainly in an end-on fashion. To check the treadmilling phenomena, the erythrocyte membranes with bidirectionally polymerized actin filaments were further incubated with G-actin at the overall critical concentration. In this case, almost all (90%) of actin filaments showed the polarity with arrowheads pointing toward the membranes. The results obtained are discussed with special reference to the mode of association of actin filaments with the plasma membrane in general.     

Mutual effects of alpha-actinin, calponin and filamin on actin binding

The mutual effect of three actin-binding proteins (alpha-actinin, calponin and filamin) on the binding to actin was analyzed by means of differential centrifugation and electron microscopy. In the absence of actin alpha-actinin, calponin and filamin do not interact with each other. Calponin and filamin do not interfere with each other in the binding to actin bundles. Slight interference was observed in the binding of alpha-actinin and calponin to actin bundles. Higher ability of calponin to depress alpha-actinin binding can be due to the higher stoichiometry calponin/actin in the complexes formed. The largest interference was observed in the pair filamin-alpha-actinin. These proteins interfere with each other in the binding to the bundled actin filaments; however, neither of them completely displaced another protein from its complexes with actin. The structure of actin bundles formed in the presence of any one actin-binding protein was different from that observed in the presence of binary mixtures of two actin-binding proteins. In the case of calponin or its binary mixtures with alpha-actinin or filamin the total stoichiometry actin-binding protein/actin was larger than 0.5. This means that alpha-actinin, calponin and filamin may coexist on actin filaments and more than mol of any actin-binding protein is bound per two actin monomers. This may be important for formation of different elements of cytoskeleton.     

Mutual effects of α-actinin,calponin and filamin on actin binding

The mutual effect of three actin-binding proteins (α-actinin, calponin and filamin) on the binding to actin was analyzed by means of differential centrifugation and electron microscopy. In the absence of actin α-actinin, calponin and filamin do not interact with each other. Calponin and filamin do not interfere with each other in the binding to actin bundles. Slight interference was observed in the binding of α-actinin and calponin to actin bundles. Higher ability of calponin to depress α-actinin binding can be due to the higher stoichiometry calponin/actin in the complexes formed. The largest interference was observed in the pair filamin–α-actinin. These proteins interfere with each other in the binding to the bundled actin filaments; however, neither of them completely displaced another protein from its complexes with actin. The structure of actin bundles formed in the presence of any one actin-binding protein was different from that observed in the presence of binary mixtures of two actin-binding proteins. In the case of calponin or its binary mixtures with α-actinin or filamin the total stoichiometry actin-binding protein/actin was larger than 0.5. This means that α-actinin, calponin and filamin may coexist on actin filaments and more than mol of any actin-binding protein is bound per two actin monomers. This may be important for formation of different elements of cytoskeleton.     

Plant villin, lily P-135-ABP, possesses G-actin binding activity and accelerates the polymerization and depolymerization of actin in a Ca2+-sensitive manner

From germinating pollen of lily, two types of villins, P-115-ABP and P-135-ABP, have been identified biochemically. Ca(2+)-CaM-dependent actin-filament binding and bundling activities have been demonstrated for both villins previously. Here, we examined the effects of lily villins on the polymerization and depolymerization of actin. P-115-ABP and P-135-ABP present in a crude protein extract prepared from germinating pollen bound to a DNase I affinity column in a Ca(2+)-dependent manner. Purified P-135-ABP reduced the lag period that precedes actin filament polymerization from monomers in the presence of either Ca(2+) or Ca(2+)-CaM. These results indicated that P-135-ABP can form a complex with G-actin in the presence of Ca(2+) and this complex acts as a nucleus for polymerization of actin filaments. However, the nucleation activity of P-135-ABP is probably not relevant in vivo because the assembly of G-actin saturated with profilin, a situation that mimics conditions found in pollen, was not accelerated in the presence of P-135-ABP. P-135-ABP also enhanced the depolymerization of actin filaments during dilution-mediated disassembly. Growth from filament barbed ends in the presence of Ca(2+)-CaM was also prevented, consistent with filament capping activity. These results suggested that lily villin is involved not only in the arrangement of actin filaments into bundles in the basal and shank region of the pollen tube, but also in regulating and modulating actin dynamics through its capping and depolymerization (or fragmentation) activities in the apical region of the pollen tube, where there is a relatively high concentration of Ca(2+).     

Electron microscopic determination of the actin filament end at which cytochalasin B blocks monomer addition using the acrosomal actin bundle from horseshoe crab sperm

G-actin freed from exogenous ATP was added to the pieces of isolated acrosomal actin bundles from horseshoe crab sperm to form filaments as reported earlier (Tilney, L.G., Bonder, E.M., & DeRosier, D.J. (1981) J. Cell Biol. 90, 485-494). The growth of a filament was far more rapid at one end (the preferred end) than the other end. These ends were shown to correspond to the barbed and pointed ends, respectively, by decoration of the filaments with myosin subfragment 1. Cytochalasin B inhibited the monomer addition at the preferred end. This technique is useful in determining the ends to which actin filament end-binding proteins from nonmuscle cells bind, which are considered to regulate the actin polymerization in the cells.     

Probing actin polymerization by intermolecular cross-linking

We have used N,N'-1,4-phenylenebismaleimide, a bifunctional sulfhydryl cross-linking reagent, to probe the oligomeric state of actin during the early stages of its polymerization into filaments. We document that one of the first steps in the polymerization of globular monomeric actin (G-actin) under a wide variety of ionic conditions is the dimerization of a significant fraction of the G-actin monomer pool. As polymerization proceeds, the yield of this initial dimer ("lower" dimer with an apparent molecular mass of 86 kD by SDS-PAGE [LD]) is attenuated, while an actin filament dimer ("upper" dimer with an apparent molecular mass of 115 kD by SDS-PAGE [UD] as characterized [Elzinga, M., and J. J. Phelan. 1984. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 81:6599-6602]) is formed. This shift from LD to UD occurs concomitant with formation of filaments as assayed by N-(1-pyrenyl)iodoacetamide fluorescence enhancement and electron microscopy. Isolated cross-linked LD does not form filaments, while isolated cross-linked UD will assemble into filaments indistinguishable from those polymerized from unmodified G-actin under typical filament-forming conditions. The presence of cross-linked LD does not effect the kinetics of polymerization of actin monomer, whereas cross-linked UD shortens the "lag phase" of the polymerization reaction in a concentration-dependent fashion. Several converging lines of evidence suggest that, although accounting for a significant oligomeric species formed during early polymerization, the LD is incompatible with the helical symmetry defining the mature actin filament; however, it could represent the interfilament dimer found in paracrystalline arrays or filament bundles. Furthermore, the LD is compatible with the unit cell structure and symmetry common to various types of crystalline actin arrays (Aebi, U., W. E. Fowler, G. Isenberg, T. D. Pollard, and P. R. Smith. 1981. J. Cell Biol. 91:340-351) and might represent the major structural state in which a mutant beta-actin (Leavitt, J., G. Bushar, T. Kakunaga, H. Hamada, T. Hirakawa, D. Goldman, and C. Merril. 1982. Cell. 28:259-268) is arrested under polymerizing conditions.     

Controlled self-assembly of actin filaments for dynamic biodevices

We investigated the immobilization of actin filaments and its self-assembly in vitro in a continuous-flow system on poly(styrene-maleic acid) (PSMA), poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), poly(t-butyl methacrylate) [P(tBuMA)] polymeric surfaces and along the linear channels. Among these polymeric surfaces, PSMA appeared to be more suitable for supramolecular manipulations as it lacked inherent fluorescence, had good biocompatibility with actin-myosin, and provided sufficient amounts of binding sites for the covalent immobilization of actin. Covalent attachment of G-actin on PSMA polymeric surfaces resulted in stable polymerization followed by alignment of filaments over 1.5 h, along with a greater surface density of the proteins. It is shown that electrostatic condensation of intact F-actin filaments and F-actin/gelsolin filaments with Ba²⁺ can be successfully used for progressive bundle formation and alignment in the constant flow. Actin bundles retained their ability to support HMM-anti-HMM bead translocation. Long-range cooperative transitions in actin induced by gelsolin represent a structural perturbation of the barbed end and presumably result in regularly organized bundles that secure directional movement. This simple technique for fabrication of self-assembled and aligned F-actin/gelsolin bundles provides a convenient experimental system for nanotechnological applications.     

Phosphorylation by actin kinase of the pointed end domain on the actin molecule.

Fragmin from plasmodium of Physarum polycephalum binds G-actin and severs F-actin in the presence of Ca2+ over 10(-6) M. The fragmin-actin complex consisting of fragmin and G-actin nucleates actin polymerization and caps the barbed (fast growing) end of F-actin, regardless of the concentrations of Ca2+, and the actin filaments are shortened. Actin kinase purified from plasmodium abolishes the nucleation and capping activities of the complex by phosphorylating actin of the fragmin-actin complex (Furuhashi, K., and Hatano, S. (1990) J. Cell. Biol. 111, 1081-1087). This inactivation of the complex leads to production of long actin filaments. We obtained evidence that Physarum actin is phosphorylated by actin kinase at Thr-201, and probably at Thr-202 and/or Thr-203, with 1 mol of phosphate distributed among them. This finding raises the possibility that the site of phosphorylation, Thr-201 to Thr-203, is positioned on the pointed (slow growing) end domain of the actin molecule, because growth of actin filaments from the fragmin-actin complex occurs only from the pointed end. These observations are consistent with a model of the three-dimensional structure of G-actin. Inactivation of the fragmen-actin complex may follow phosphorylation of the pointed end domain of actin.     

The V-ATPase subunit C binds to polymeric F-actin as well as to monomeric G-actin and induces cross-linking of actin filaments

Previously, we have shown that the V-ATPase holoenzyme as well as the V1 complex isolated from the midgut of the tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta) exhibits the ability of binding to actin filaments via the V1 subunits B and C (Vitavska, O., Wieczorek, H., and Merzendorfer,H. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 18499-18505). Since the recombinant subunit C not only enhances actin binding of the V1 complex but also can bind separately to F-actin, we analyzed the interaction of recombinant subunit C with actin. We demonstrate that it binds not only to F-actin but also to monomeric G-actin. With dissociation constants of approximately 50 nm, the interaction exhibits a high affinity, and no difference could be observed between binding to ATP-G-actin or ADP-G-actin, respectively. Unlike other proteins such as members of the ADF/cofilin family, which also bind to G- as well as to F-actin, subunit C does not destabilize actin filaments. On the contrary, under conditions where the disassembly of F-actin into G-actin usually occurred, subunit C stabilized F-actin. In addition, it increased the initial rate of actin polymerization in a concentration-dependent manner and was shown to cross-link actin filaments to bundles of varying thickness. Apparently bundling is enabled by the existence of at least two actin-binding sites present in the N- and in the C-terminal halves of subunits C, respectively. Since subunit C has the possibility to dimerize or even to oligomerize, spacing between actin filaments could be variable in size.     

Investigation of the actin-deoxyribonuclease I interaction using a pyrene-conjugated actin derivative

The interaction of deoxyribonuclease I with muscle actin was studied with the aid of a pyrenyl derivative of the actin [Kouyama, T., & Mihashi, K. (1981) Eur. J. Biochem. 114, 33-38] that increases its quantum yield by an order of magnitude on polymerization. It is shown that this derivative copolymerizes with unlabeled G-actin in a random manner and will also bind to deoxyribonuclease with inhibition of enzymic activity. The derivative affords a highly sensitive means of following nucleated polymerization. Preincubation of F-actin with deoxyribonuclease at a concentration of 5% or less of that of total subunits causes inhibition of polymerization of additional G-actin onto the filaments. In red cell membranes that contain stabilized short filaments of actin such that the concentration of filament ends is large relative to monomers, complete inhibition of nucleated polymerization of G-actin is achieved by preincubation with deoxyribonuclease. The results indicate that binding of DNase occurs at the "plus" ends of the actin filaments. Competition with cytochalasin E, which is known to have a high affinity for the plus or preferentially growing ends of F-actin, can be observed. Whereas the activity of deoxyribonuclease in the 1:1 complex with G-actin is inhibited, the enzyme attached to the ends of filaments appears to be fully active. This causes a reduction in the inhibition of enzymic activity with increasing F-actin concentration, presumably by reason of a change in the partition of the enzyme between monomers and filament ends. The degree of inhibition increases with time, however, as the actin depolymerizes. Implications for measurements of actin monomer concentrations by the deoxyribonuclease assay procedure are considered.     

Biochemical evidence for interaction between smoothelin and filamentous actin

The two major isoforms of smoothelin (A and B) contain a calponin homology (CH) domain, colocalize with alpha-smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA) in stress fibers and are only expressed in contractile smooth muscle cells (SMCs). Based on these findings, we hypothesized that smoothelins are involved in smooth muscle cell contraction, presumably via interaction with actin. The interaction between smoothelins and three different actin isoforms (alpha- and gamma-smooth muscle and alpha-skeletal actin [alpha-SKA]) was investigated using several in vitro assays. Smoothelin-B co-immunoprecipitated with alpha-smooth muscle actin from pig aorta extracts. In rat embryonic fibroblasts, transfected smoothelins-A and -B associated with stress fibers. In vitro dot blot assays, in which immobilized actin was overlaid with radio-labeled smoothelin, showed binding of smoothelin-A to actin filaments, but not to monomeric G-actin. A truncated smoothelin, containing the calponin homology domain, associated with stress fibers when transfected and bound to actin filaments in overlay, but to a lesser extent. ELISA results showed that the binding of smoothelin to actin has no significant isoform specificity. Our results indicate an interaction between smoothelin and actin filaments. Moreover, the calponin homology domain and its surrounding sequences appear to be sufficient to accomplish this interaction, although the presence of other domains is apparently necessary to facilitate and/or strengthen the binding to actin.     

LL-37 Induces Polymerization and Bundling of Actin and Affects Actin Structure

Actin exists as a monomer (G-actin) which can be polymerized to filaments) F-actin) that under the influence of actin-binding proteins and polycations bundle and contribute to the formation of the cytoskeleton. Bundled actin from lysed cells increases the viscosity of sputum in lungs of cystic fibrosis patients. The human host defense peptide LL-37 was previously shown to induce actin bundling and was thus hypothesized to contribute to the pathogenicity of this disease. In this work, interactions between actin and the cationic LL-37 were studied by optical, proteolytic and surface plasmon resonance methods and compared to those obtained with scrambled LL-37 and with the cationic protein lysozyme. We show that LL-37 binds strongly to CaATP-G-actin while scrambled LL-37 does not. While LL-37, at superstoichiometric LL-37/actin concentrations polymerizes MgATP-G-actin, at lower non-polymerizing concentrations LL-37 inhibits actin polymerization by MgCl₂ or NaCl. LL-37 bundles Mg-F-actin filaments both at low and physiological ionic strength when in equimolar or higher concentrations than those of actin. The LL-37 induced bundles are significantly less sensitive to increase in ionic strength than those induced by scrambled LL-37 and lysozyme. LL-37 in concentrations lower than those needed for actin polymerization or bundling, accelerates cleavage of both monomer and polymer actin by subtilisin. Our results indicate that the LL-37-actin interaction is partially electrostatic and partially hydrophobic and that a specific actin binding sequence in the peptide is responsible for the hydrophobic interaction. LL-37-induced bundles, which may contribute to the accumulation of sputum in cystic fibrosis, are dissociated very efficiently by DNase-1 and also by cofilin.     

Interactions of myosin subfragment 1 isozymes with G-actin

The polymerization of G-actin by myosin subfragment 1 (S-1) isozymes, S-1(A1) and S-1(A2), and their proteolytically cleaved forms was studied by light-scattering, fluorescence, and analytical ultracentrifugation techniques. As reported previously, S-1(A1) polymerized G-actin rapidly while S-1(A2) could hardly promote the assembly reaction (Chaussepied & Kasprzak, 1989a; Chen and Reisler, 1990). This difference between the isozymes of S-1 was traced to the very poor, if any, ability of G-actin-S-1(A2) complexes to nucleate the assembly of actin filaments. The formation of G-actin-S-1(A2) complexes was verified in sedimentation velocity experiments and by fluorescence measurements using pyrene-labeled actin. The G-actin-S-1(A2) complexes supported the growth of actin filaments and accelerated the polymerization of actin in solutions seeded with MgCl2-, KCl-, and S-1(A1)-generated nuclei. The growth rates of actin-S-1(A2) filaments were markedly slower than those for actin-S-1(A1) filaments. Proteolytic cleavage of S-1 isozymes at the 50/20-kDa junction of the heavy chain greatly decreased their binding to G-actin and thus inhibited the polymerization of actin by S-1(A1). These results are discussed in the context of G-actin-S-1 interactions.     

Inhibition of an early stage of actin polymerization by actobindin

Actobindin, a 25,000-dalton dimeric protein purified from Acanthamoeba castellanii was previously shown to form a 1:1 molar complex with both Acanthamoeba and rabbit muscle G-actin with KD values of about 5 and 7 microM, respectively, and not to interact with F-actin (Lambooy, P. K., and Korn, E. D. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 17150-17155). We now find that actobindin is a much more potent inhibitor of the early phases of polymerization of both Acanthamoeba and muscle G-actin than can be accounted for by its binding to G-actin. Actobindin inhibits the polymerization of both G-ATP-actin and G-ADP-actin, and has little, if any, effect on the rate of ATP hydrolysis that accompanies polymerization of G-ATP-actin. The kinetics of actin polymerization in the presence of actobindin are qualitatively consistent with the postulation that actobindin binds reversibly to and inhibits the elongation of an intermediate between G-actin and F-actin, perhaps a small oligomer(s) or a species in equilibrium with such an intermediate. This hypothesis implies the, at least transient, existence of an actin species with properties different from those of monomers and filaments. Actobindin may, then, provide a useful experimental tool for investigating the still relatively obscure early steps in actin polymerization. Irrespective of its mechanism of action, actobindin might serve in situ to reduce the rate of actin polymerization de novo while having relatively little effect on the rates of elongation of existing filaments or from actobindin-resistant nucleating sites.     

Some Properties of Caldesmon and Calponin and the Participation of These Proteins in Regulation of Smooth Muscle Contraction and Cytoskeleton Formation

The interaction of caldesmon with different Ca²⁺-binding proteins has been analyzed, and it is supposed that one of the conformers of calmodulin might be an endogenous regulator of caldesmon. The arrangement of caldesmon and Ca²⁺-binding proteins within their complexes has been analyzed by different methods. The central helix of calmodulin is supposed to be located near the single Cys residue in the C-terminal domain of caldesmon. The N-terminal globular domain of calmodulin interacts with sites A and B" of caldesmon, whereas the C-terminal globular domain of calmodulin binds to site B of caldesmon. The complex of calmodulin and caldesmon is very flexible; therefore, both parallel and antiparallel orientation of polypeptide chains of the two proteins is possible in experiments with short fragments of caldesmon and calmodulin. The length, flexibility, and charge of the central helix of calmodulin play an important role in its interaction with caldesmon. Phosphorylation of caldesmon by different protein kinases in vitro has been analyzed. It was shown that phosphorylation catalyzed by casein kinase II of sites located in the N-terminal domain decreases the interaction of caldesmon with myosin and tropomyosin. Caldesmon and calponin may interact with phospholipids. The sites involved in the interaction of these actinbinding proteins with phospholipids have been mapped. It is supposed that the interaction of calponin and caldesmon with phospholipids may play a role in the formation of cytoskeleton. Calponin interacts with 90-kD heat shock protein (hsp90) that may be involved in transportation of calponin and its proper interaction with different elements of cytoskeleton. Calponin, filamin, and a-actinin can simultaneously interact with actin filaments. Simultaneous binding of two actin-binding proteins affects the structure of actin bundles and their mechanical properties and may be of great importance in formation of different elements of cytoskeleton.     

Characterization of oligomers as kinetic intermediates in myosin subfragment 1-induced polymerization of G-actin.

The nature of the kinetic intermediates involved in S1-induced polymerization of G-actin into F-acto-S1-decorated filaments has been investigated using as probes light scattering, the fluorescence of pyrenyl- or NBD-labeled actin, and the anisotropy of fluorescence of N-iodoacetyl-N'-(5-sulfo-1-napthyl)ethylene diamine (AEDANS)-labeled actin. With AEDANS-G-actin, the initial formation of a ternary G2S complex between two G-actin and one S1 molecules (Valentin-Ranc, C., Combeau, C., Carlier, M. F., and Pantaloni, D. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 17871-17879) has been confirmed. Data obtained with all probes are consistent with the subsequent rapid formation of G-actin-S1 oligomers in which the actin/S1 molar ratio is 2:1. Oligomers form above 0.6 microM G-actin with S1(A1) and above 3.5 microM G-actin with S1(A2), at 20 degrees C. Oligomerization is endothermic with a delta H of 14 kcal/mol. A tentative model is proposed to comprehensively account for the data and the structural features of the F-actin-S1 filament. Within this model, longitudinal actin-actin interactions take place in G2S, and lateral, hydrophobic actin-actin interactions appear upon formation of (G2S)n oligomers.     

Binding of human angiogenin inhibits actin polymerization

Angiogenin is a potent inducer of angiogenesis, a process of blood vessel formation. It interacts with endothelial and other cells and elicits a wide range of cellular responses including migration, proliferation, and tube formation. One important target of angiogenin is endothelial cell-surface actin and their interaction might be one of essential steps in angiogenin-induced neovascularization. Based on earlier indications that angiogenin promotes actin polymerization, we studied the binding interactions between angiogenin and actin in a wide range of conditions. We showed that at subphysiological KCl concentrations, angiogenin does not promote, but instead inhibits polymerization by sequestering G-actin. At low KCl concentrations angiogenin induces formation of unstructured aggregates, which, as shown by NMR, may be caused by angiogenin’s propensity to form oligomers. Binding of angiogenin to preformed F-actin does not cause depolymerization of actin filaments though it causes their stiffening. Binding of tropomyosin and angiogenin to F-actin is not competitive at concentrations sufficient for saturation of actin filaments. These observations suggest that angiogenin may cause changes in the cell cytoskeleton by inhibiting polymerization of G-actin and changing the physical properties of F-actin.