Requirement of a neural tube signal for the differentiation of neural crest cells into dorsal root ganglia

The influence of the neural tube on early development of neural crest cells into sensory ganglia was studied in the chick embryo. Silastic membranes were implanted between the neural tube and the somites in 30-somite-stage embryos at the level of somites 21-24, thus separating the early migrated population of neural crest cells from the neural tube. Neural crest cells and peripheral ganglia were visualized by immunofluorescence using the HNK-1 monoclonal antibody and several histochemical techniques. Separation of crest cells from the neural tube caused the selective death of the neural crest cells from which dorsal root ganglia (DRG) would have developed. Complete disappearance of HNK-1 positive cells was evident already 10 hr after silastic implantation, before early differentiation sensory neurons could have reached their peripheral targets. In older embryos, DRG were absent at the level of implantation. In contrast, the development of ventral roots, sympathetic ganglia and adrenal gland was normal, and so was somitic differentiation into cartilage and muscle, while morphogenesis of the vertebrae was perturbed. To overcome the experimentally induced crest cell death, the silastic membranes were impregnated with a 3-day-old embryonic chick neural tube extract. Under these conditions, crest cells which were separated from the tube survived for a period of 30 hr after operation, compared to less than 10 hr in respective controls. The extract of another tissue, the liver, did not protract survival of DRG progenitor cells. Among the cells which survived with neural tube extract, some even succeeded in extending neurites; nevertheless, in absence of normal connections with the central nervous system (CNS) they finally died. Treatment of silastic implanted embryos with nerve growth factor (NGF) did not prevent the experimentally induced crest cell death. These results demonstrate that DRG develop from a population of neural crest cells which depends for its survival and probably for its differentiation upon a signal arising from the CNS, needed as early as the first hours after initiation of migration. Recovery experiments suggest that the subpopulation of crest cells which will develop along the sensory pathway probably depends for its survival and/or differentiation upon a factor contained in the neural tube, which is different from NGF.     

Notochordal and foregut abnormalities correlate with elevated neural crest apoptosis in Patch embryos

Although Patch mutants show severe abnormalities in many neural crest-derived structures including the face and the heart, there is a paucity of information characterizing the mechanisms underlying these congenital defects. Via manipulating the genetic background to circumvent early embryonic lethality, our results revealed that Patch phenotypes are most likely due to a significant decrease in migratory neural crest lineage due to diminished neural crest survival and elevated apoptosis. Homozygous mutant neural crest precursors can undergo typical expansion within the neural tube, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transformation, and initiate normal neural crest emigration. Moreover, in vitro explant culture demonstrated that when isolated from the surrounding mesenchyme, Patch mutant neural crest cells (NCCs) can migrate appropriately. Additionally, Patch foregut, notochord and somitic morphogenesis, and Sonic hedgehog expression profiles were all perturbed. Significantly, the timing of lethality and extent of apoptosis correlated with the degree of severity of Patch mutant foregut, notochord, and somite dysfunction. Finally, analysis of Balb/c-enriched surviving Patch mutants revealed that not all the neural crest subpopulations are affected and that Patch mutant neural crest-derived sympathetic ganglia and dorsal root ganglia were unaffected. We hypothesize that loss of normal coordinated signaling from the notochord, foregut, and somites underlies the diminished survival of the neural crest lineage within Patch mutants resulting in subsequent neural crest-deficient phenotypes.     

In vitro analysis of sympathetic neuron differentiation from chick neural crest cells

Sympathetic neuron differentiation was studied using a fluorescence histochemical assay to detect the appearance of cell-bound catecholamines. Results from in vitro organ cultures indicate that chick neural crest cells must interact with both ventral neural tube (defined throughout as the ventral neural tube plus the notochord) and somitic mesenchyme in order to differentiate into sympathoblasts. Somite, ventral neural tube, and crest were cultured transfilter in various combinations to define these tissue interactions more precisely. Results from these experiments indicate that neural crest cells must be contiguous to somite in order to differentiate into sympathoblasts, but ventral neural tube may act across a Millipore filter membrane (type TH, 25 μm thick) either on somite, crest, or both. To distinguish among these possibilities, somite was cultured transfilter to ventral tube for a short period, after which ventral tube was removed and fresh crest was added to the somite. The results from this and other experiments support the hypothesis that the ventral tube does not act directly on crest cells, but elicits a developmental change in somitic mesenchyme, which then promotes sympathoblast differentiation. To study the relationship of nerve growth factor (NGF) to the differentiation of sympathetic neurons, cultures of somite + crest were temporarily exposed transfilter to ventral tube, in the presence or the absence of exogenous NGF. The results of these and other experiments are consistent with the hypothesis that the continued presence of ventral tube is required to ensure the survival of the differentiating sympathetic neurons. With respect to this second function, ventral tube can be replaced by exogenous NGF.     

The foot formation stimulating peptide pedibin is also involved in patterning of the head in hydra

Avian neural crest cells migrate on precise pathways to their target areas where they form a wide variety of cellular derivatives, including neurons, glia, pigment cells and skeletal components. In one portion of their pathway, trunk neural crest cells navigate in the somitic mesoderm in a segmental fashion, invading the rostral, while avoiding the caudal, half-sclerotome. This pattern of cell migration, imposed by the somitic mesoderm, contributes to the metameric organization of the peripheral nervous system, including the sensory and sympathetic ganglia. At hindbrain levels, neural crest cells also travel from the neural tube in a segmental manner via three migratory streams of cells that lie adjacent to even-numbered rhombomeres. In this case, the adjacent mesoderm does not possess an obvious segmental organization, compared to the somitic mesoderm at trunk levels. Thus, the mechanisms by which the embryo controls segmentally-organized cell migrations have been a fascinating topic over the past several years. Here, I discuss findings from classical and recent studies that have delineated several of the tissue, cellular and molecular elements that contribute to the segmental organization of neural crest migration, primarily in the avian embryo. One common theme is that neural crest cells are prohibited from entering particular territories in the embryo due to the expression of inhibitory factors. However, permissive, migration-promoting factors may also play a key role in coordinating neural crest migration.     

Spatial and temporal distribution of the adherens-junction-associated adhesion molecule A-CAM during avian embryogenesis

A-CAM (adherens-junction-specific cell adhesion molecule) is a calcium-dependent adhesion molecule which is associated with intercellular adherens junctions in various tissues (Volk & Geiger, 1986, J. Cell Biol. 103, 1441-1450 and 1451-1464). In the present report, we have investigated the distribution of A-CAM during avian morphogenesis by immunofluorescence microscopy and immunoblotting. A-CAM appeared at the onset of gastrulation on developing mesodermal and endodermal cells and was then expressed on tissues derived from the three primary germ layers. During embryonic life, A-CAM was constitutively expressed in a number of tissues including the central and peripheral nervous system, myocardium, muscles, notochord, skin and lens whereas it was found transiently in many tissues ranging from the nephritic tubules and the endoderm of visceral arches to ectodermal placodes. In the adult, in addition to the nervous system, A-CAM was restricted to the skin, lens, heart and testis, and exhibited an apparent molecular weight higher than the one found in the embryo. The prevalence and cell-surface modulation of A-CAM could frequently be correlated with morphogenetic events such as mesenchyme condensation into epithelia or cell clusters (e.g. formation of the somitic epithelium, kidney tubules and peripheral ganglia), dissociation of epithelia (e.g. dissociation of the somitic epithelium and segregation of neural crest from the neural tube), separation of cell populations (e.g. fibroblasts and myotubes in the heart) and reorganizations of epithelia (e.g. neurulation). In addition, using electron microscopy, the expression of A-CAM on the surface of aggregating and separating cells could be correlated with the formation and disappearance of adherens junctions. This precisely scheduled control of A-CAM correlated with early morphogenetic events during embryogenesis suggests that this CAM could play a crucial role in these processes.     

The effect of back-transplants of the embryonic gut wall on growth of the neural tube

Experiments in which the developing gut of avian embryos was back-transplanted to permit the bowel to interact with the developing neural tube were undertaken. Segments of intestine from 4-day quail embryos were implanted between the somites and neural tubes of chick embryos of 7 to 24 somites. The spinal cord responded to the presence of the bowel by enlarging unilaterally on the side of the graft. This effect encompassed both gray and white matter and was accompanied by the extension of neuritic projections from the spinal cord into the enteric grafts. The growth-promoting effect of enteric transplants was manifest at all levels of the neural tube where the grafts were made and led to enlargement of the brain as well as the spinal cord; however, truncal neural crest derivatives in the region of the grafts, such as developing sympathetic and spinal ganglia, were unaffected. Neither sham operations nor grafts of ciliary ganglion, lung, pancreas, mesonephros, or rudiment of the eye mimicked the action of the gut. The effect of the bowel was manifest as early as 24 hr following back-transplantation and was found to be due to an increase in the number of cells in the neuroepithelium. The cell responsible for the ability of the gut wall to enhance neuroepithelial proliferation was not identified, but the effect lacked species specificity and could be elicited in the absence of endoderm or neural crest derivatives in the explant. We propose that the musculoconnective tissue of the gut produces a short-range diffusible factor that induces mitogenic activity in the neuroepithelial cells of the neural tube, but not in the crest cells that form sympathetic or sensory ganglia. Since the gut is not normally in apposition to the neural tube, we suggest that the physiological targets of this factor are the specialized crest cells that colonize the bowel and give rise to the enteric nervous system.     

Morphogenesis of sclerotome and neural crest in avian embryos

Summary The distribution of sclerotome and neural crest cells of avian embryos was studied by light and electron microscopy. Sclerotome cells radiated from the somites towards the notochord, to occupy the perichordal space. Neural crest cells, at least initially, also entered cell-free spaces. At the cranial somitic levels they moved chiefly dorsal to the somites, favouring the rostral part of each somite. These cells did not approach the perichordal space. More caudally (i.e. trunk levels), neural crest cells initially moved ventrally between the somites and neural tube. Adjacent to the caudal half of each somite, these cells penetrated no further than the myosclerotomal border, but opposite the rostral somite half, they were found next to the sclerotome almost as far ventrally as the notochord. However, they did not appear to enter the perichordal space, in contrast to sclerotome cells.When tested in vitro, sclerotome cells migrated towards notochords co-cultured on fibronectin-rich extracellular material, and on collagen gels. In contrast, neural crest cells avoided co-cultured notochords. This avoidance was abolished by inclusion of testicular hyaluronidase and chondroitinase ABC in the culture medium, but not by hyaluronidase from Streptomyces hyalurolyticus. The results suggest that sclerotome and neural crest mesenchyme cells have a different distribution with respect to the notochord, and that differential responses to notochordal extracellular material, possibly chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan, may be responsible for this.     

Spinal motor axons and neural crest cells use different molecular guides for segmental migration through the rostral half-somite

The peripheral nervous system in vertebrates is composed of repeating metameric units of spinal nerves. During development, factors differentially expressed in a rostrocaudal pattern in the somites confine the movement of spinal motor axons and neural crest cells to the rostral half of the somitic sclerotome. The expression patterns of transmembrane ephrin-B ligands and interacting EphB receptors suggest that these proteins are likely candidates for coordinating the segmentation of spinal motor axons and neural crest cells. In vitro, ephrin-B1 has indeed been shown to repel axons extending from the rodent neural tube (Wang & Anderson, 1997). In avians, blocking interactions between EphB3 expressed by neural crest cells and ephrin-B1 localized to the caudal half of the somite in vivo resulted in loss of the rostrocaudal patterning of trunk neural crest migration (Krull et al., 1997). The role of ephrin-B1 in patterning spinal motor axon outgrowth in avian embryos was investigated. Ephrin-B1 protein was found to be expressed in the caudal half-sclerotome and in the dermomyotome at the appropriate time to interact with the EphB2 receptor expressed on spinal motor axons. Treatment of avian embryo explants with soluble ephrin-B1, however, did not perturb the segmental outgrowth of spinal motor axons through the rostral half-somite. In contrast, under the same treatment conditions with soluble ephrin-B1, neural crest cells migrated aberrantly through both rostral and caudal somite halves. These results indicate that the interaction between ephrin-B1 and EphB2 is not required for patterning spinal motor axon segmentation. Even though spinal motor axons traverse the same somitic pathway as neural crest cells, different molecular guidance mechanisms appear to influence their movement.     

Tissue interactions affecting the migration and differentiation of neural crest cells in the chick embryo.

A series of microsurgical operations was performed in chick embryos to study the factors that control the polarity, position and differentiation of the sympathetic and dorsal root ganglion cells developing from the neural crest. The neural tube, with or without the notochord, was rotated by 180 degrees dorsoventrally to cause the neural crest cells to emerge ventrally. In some embryos, the notochord was ablated, and in others a second notochord was implanted. Sympathetic differentiation was assessed by catecholamine fluorescence after aldehyde fixation. Neural crest cells emerging from an inverted neural tube migrate in a ventral-to-dorsal direction through the sclerotome, where they become segmented by being restricted to the rostral half of each sclerotome. Both motor axons and neural crest cells avoid the notochord and the extracellular matrix that surrounds it, but motor axons appear also to be attracted to the notochord until they reach its immediate vicinity. The dorsal root ganglia always form adjacent to the neural tube and their dorsoventral orientation follows the direction of migration of the neural crest cells. Differentiation of catecholaminergic cells only occurs near the aorta/mesonephros and in addition requires the proximity of either the ventral neural tube (floor plate/ventral root region) or the notochord. Prior migration of presumptive catecholaminergic cells through the sclerotome, however, is neither required nor sufficient for their adrenergic differentiation.     

Formation of the dorsal root ganglia in the avian embryo: Segmental origin and migratory behavior of neural crest progenitor cells

The segmental origin and migratory pattern of neural crest cells at the trunk level of avian embryos was studied, with special emphasis on the formation of the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) which organize in the anterior half of each somite. Neural crest cells were visualized using the quail-chick marker and HNK-1 immunofluorescence. The migratory process turned out to be closely correlated with somitic development: when the somites are epithelial in structure few labeled cells were found in a dorsolateral position on the neural tube, uniformly distributed along the craniocaudal axis. Following somitic dissociation into dermomyotome and sclerotome labeled cells follow defined migratory pathways restricted to each anterior somitic half. In contrast, opposite the posterior half of the somites, cells remain grouped in a dorsolateral position on the neural tube. The fate of crest cells originating at the level of the posterior somitic half was investigated by grafting into chick hosts short segments of quail neural primordium, which ended at mid-somitic or at intersomitic levels. It was found that neural crest cells arising opposite the posterior somitic half participate in the formation of the DRG and Schwann cells lining the dorsal and ventral root fibers of the same somitic level as well as of the subsequent one, whereas those cells originating from levels facing the anterior half of a somite participate in the formation of the corresponding DRG. Moreover, crest cells from both segmental halves segregate within each ganglion in a distinct topographical arrangement which reflects their segmental origin on the neural primordium. Labeled cells which relocate from posterior into anterior somitic regions migrate longitudinally along the neural tube. Longitudinal migration of neural crest cells was first observed when the somites are epithelial in structure and is completed after the disappearance of the last cells from the posterior somitic region at a stage corresponding to the organogenesis of the DRG.     

Mouse-chick neural chimeras

Embryonic chimera production was used to study the developmental processes of the mouse nervous system. The difficulty of performing in situ transplantation experiments of neural primordium of mouse embryo was overcome by isotopic and isochronic grafting of mouse neural tube fragments into chick embryo. Mouse neural tube cells differentiated perfectly in ovo and neural crest cells associated with the grafted neural tube were able to migrate and reach the normal arrest sites of host neural crests. Cranial neural crest cells penetrated into chick facial areas and entered into the development of dental bud structures, participating in vibrissa formation. Depending on graft level, in ovo implanted mouse neural crest cells formed different components of the peripheral nervous system. At trunk level, they located in spinal ganglia and orthosympathetic chains and gave rise to Schwann cells lining the nerves. When implanted into the lumbosacral region, they penetrated into the enteric nervous system. At the precise 18-24 somite level, they colonized host adrenal gland. Mouse neural tube was involved in the mechanisms required to maintain myogenesis in host somites. Furthermore in ovo grafts of mouse cells from genetically modified embryos, in which many mutations induce early death, are particularly useful to investigate cellular events involved in the development of the nervous system and to identify molecular events of embryogenesis.     

Neural crest cell migratory pathways in the trunk of the chick embryo

Neural crest cells migrate during embryogenesis to give rise to segmented structures of the vertebrate peripheral nervous system: namely, the dorsal root ganglia and the sympathetic chain. However, neural crest cell arise from the dorsal neural tube where they are apparently unsegmented. It is generally agreed that the somites impose segmentation on migrating crest cells, but there is a disagreement about two basic questions: exactly pathways do neural crest cells use to move through or around somites, and do neural crest cells actively migrate or are they passively dispersed by the movement of somite cells? The answers to both questions are critically important to any further understanding of the mechanisms underlying the precise distribution of the neural crest cells that develop into ganglia. We have done an exhaustive study of the locations of neural crest cells in chick embryos during early stages of their movement, using antibodies to neural crest cells (HNK-1), to neural filament-associated protein in growing nerve processes (E/C8), and to the extracellular matrix molecule laminin. Our results show that Some neural crest cells invade the extracellular space between adjacent somites, but the apparent majority move into the somites themselves along the border between the dermatome/myotome (DM) and the sclerotome. Neural crest cells remain closely associated with the anterior half of the DM of developing somites as they travel, suggesting that the basal lamina of the DM may be used as a migratory substratum. Supporting this idea is our observation that the development of the DM basal lamina coincides in time and location with the onset of crest migration through the somite. The leading front of neural crest cells advance through the somite while the length of the DM pathway remains constant, suggesting active locomotion, at least in this early phase of development. Neural crest cells leave the DM at a later stage of development to associate with the dorsal aorta, where sympathetic ganglia form, and to associate with newly emerging fibers of the ventral root nerve, where they presumably give rise to neuronal supportive cells. Thus we propose that the establishment of the segmental pattern of the peripheral ganglia and nerves depends on the timely development of appropriate substrata to guide and distribute migrating neural crest cells during the early stages of embryogenesis.     

Catecholamine accumulation in neural crest cells and the primary sympathetic chain

Catecholamine accumulation in chick embryos of stages 16 to 24 was investigated using formaldehyde-induced fluorescence. Fluorescence first appeared at stage 21 in the anterior sympathetic chain. After L-DOPA treatment, this fluorescence appeared at stage 18. Noradrenaline could not advance the onset of fluorescence or reconstitute fluorescence after its depletion by reserpine at stages 22 to 24. Under no conditions could fluorescence be identified in neural crest cells prior to their aggregation to form the primary sympathetic chain. Noradrenaline induced fluorescence in the neural tube, notochord, myotome, sclerotome, gut mesenchyme and suprarenal cortical cells. In addition to these structures, the dorsal pancreas and some blood cells were fluorescent after l-DOPA treatment. The implication of the results for the neural crest origin of APUD (Amine Precursor Uptake Decaboxylase) cells is considered.     

Somite polarity and segmental patterning of the peripheral nervous system

The analysis of the outgrowth pattern of spinal axons in the chick embryo has shown that somites are polarized into anterior and posterior halves. This polarity dictates the segmental development of the peripheral nervous system: migrating neural crest cells and outgrowing spinal axons traverse exclusively the anterior halves of the somite-derived sclerotomes, ensuring a proper register between spinal axons, their ganglia and the segmented vertebral column. Much progress has been made recently in understanding the molecular basis for somite polarization, and its linkage with Notch/Delta, Wnt and Fgf signalling. Contact-repulsive molecules expressed by posterior half-sclerotome cells provide critical guidance cues for axons and neural crest cells along the anterior-posterior axis. Diffusible repellents from surrounding tissues, particularly the dermomyotome and notochord, orient outgrowing spinal axons in the dorso-ventral axis ('surround repulsion'). Repulsive forces therefore guide axons in three dimensions. Although several molecular systems have been identified that may guide neural crest cells and axons in the sclerotome, it remains unclear whether these operate together with considerable overall redundancy, or whether any one system predominates in vivo.     

The human tissue plasminogen activator-Cre mouse: a new tool for targeting specifically neural crest cells and their derivatives in vivo

The ontogeny of neural crest cells (NCC) involves a number of orchestrated variety of derivatives, including components of the peripheral nervous system and melanocytes. Thus, it represents an excellent model system to investigate mechanisms controlling epithelial-mesenchymal transitions, cell migration and differentiation, as well as cell proliferation and death. We have established a new transgenic line expressing the Cre recombinase under the control of the human tissue plasminogen activator promoter (Ht-PA). The activity of the reporter in the Ht-PA-Cre/R26R embryos is observed as early as Theiler stage 12 in the cephalic mesenchyme. Later, the targeted cells include all the known derivatives of cranial, vagal, and trunk NCC, including craniofacial structures and cranial ganglia, cardiac and endocrine derivatives, melanocytes, peripheral, and enteric nervous system. At the vagal level, the location of presumptive enteric NCC differs from their avian counterparts in their ability to invade the mesenchyme lateral to the neural tube. In contrast to the Wnt1-Cre line, the Ht-PA-Cre line does not target the central nervous system and therefore renders it more specific for NCC. Our Ht-PA-Cre mice represent a novel model to specifically target conditional mutations in migratory NCC.     

The neural tube/notochord complex is necessary for vertebral but not limb and body wall striated muscle differentiation.

The aim of this work was to investigate the role played by the axial organs, neural tube and notochord, on the differentiation of muscle cells from the somites in the avian embryo. Two of us have previously shown that neuralectomy and notochordectomy is followed by necrosis of the somites and consecutive absence of vertebrae and of most muscle cells derived from the myotomes while the limbs develop normally with muscles. Here we have focused our attention on muscle cell differentiation by using the 13F4 mAb that recognizes a cytoplasmic antigen specific of all types of muscle cells. We show that differentiation of muscle cells of myotomes can occur in the absence of notochord and neural tube provided that the somites from which they are derived have been in contact with the axial organs for a defined period of time, about 10 hours for the first somites formed at the cervical level, a duration that progressively reduces caudalward (i.e. for thoracic and lumbar somites). Either one or the other of the two axial organs, the neural tube or the notochord can prevent somitic cell death and fulfill the requirements for myotomal muscle cell differentiation. Separation of the neural tube/notochord complex from the somites by a surgical slit on one side of the embryo gave the same results as extirpation of these organs and provided a perfect control on the non-operated side. A striking finding was that limb and body wall muscles, although derived from the somites, differentiated in the absence of the axial organs. However, limb muscles that develop after excision of the neural tube started to degenerate from E10 onward due to lack of innervation. In vitro explantation of somites from different axial levels confirmed and defined precisely the chronology of muscle cell commitment in the myotomes as revealed by the in vivo experiments.     

Notochord grafts do not suppress formation of neural crest cells or commissural neurons.

Grafting experiments previously have established that the notochord affects dorsoventral polarity of the neural tube by inducing the formation of ventral structures such as motor neurons and the floor plate. Here, we examine if the notochord inhibits formation of dorsal structures by grafting a notochord within or adjacent to the dorsal neural tube prior to or shortly after tube closure. In all cases, neural crest cells emigrated from the neural tube adjacent to the ectopic notochord. When analyzed at stages after ganglion formation, the dorsal root ganglia appeared reduced in size and shifted in position in embryos receiving grafts. Another dorsal cell type, commissural neurons, identified by CRABP and neurofilament immunoreactivity, differentiated in the vicinity of the ectopic notochord. Numerous neuronal cell bodies and axonal processes were observed within the induced, but not endogenous, floor plate 1 to 2 days after implantation but appeared to be cleared with time. These results suggest that dorsally implanted notochords cannot prevent the formation of neural crest cells or commissural neurons, but can alter the size and position of neural crest-derived dorsal root ganglia.     

Normal segmentation and size of the primary sympathetic ganglia depend upon the alternation of rostrocaudal properties of the somites.

Metameric organization of the dorsal root ganglia (DRG) and ventral roots depends on the alternation of rostrocaudal properties within the somites. In addition, the size of DRG is likely to be regulated by the adjacent mesoderm, because unilateral creation of a paraxial mesoderm with only rostral somitic (RS) halves, leads to the development of non-segmented DRG that are larger and contain more cells than the sum of the contralateral, control DRG. We have now extended our studies of the role of the paraxial mesoderm in the morphogenesis of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) to another metameric PNS component, the sympathetic ganglia (SG). The development of the primary sympathetic chain was studied in chick-quail chimeras with multiple half-somite grafts using quantitative morphometric analysis. In the presence of an exclusively rostral or caudal somitic mesoderm, segmentation of the initially homogeneous primary sympathetic chain into ganglia is prevented. Therefore, the SG, like the DRG and ventral roots, require the normal rostrocaudal alternation of the somitic mesoderm for segmental morphogenesis. On embryonic day 4 (E4), there is a 38% average decrease in the volume of the primary sympathetic chain opposite a RS mesoderm, compared with the primary chain on the unoperated side. This is in contrast to the average increase of 27% in the volume of the DRG opposite the grafted mesoderm in the same embryos. Our results, and classical observations, have led us to propose a model in which the mesoderm controls DRG and SG size by modulating the partition of migrating NC precursors between the anlage of these two ganglion types. According to this model, the reduction in SG volume and concomitant increase in DRG volume observed opposite RS grafts, results from the arrest in the DRG anlage of neural crest cells that normally migrate to the SG.     

The developmental potentials of the caudalmost part of the neural crest are restricted to melanocytes and glia

The avian spinal cord is characterized by an absence of motor nerves and sensory nerves and ganglia at its caudalmost part. Since peripheral sensory neurons derive from neural crest cells, three basic mechanisms could account for this feature: (i) the caudalmost neural tube does not generate any neural crest cells; (ii) neural crest cells originating from the caudal part of the neural tube cannot give rise to dorsal root ganglia or (iii) the caudal environment is not permissive for the formation of dorsal root ganglia. To solve this problem, we have first studied the pattern of expression of ventral (HNF3beta) and dorsal (slug) marker genes in the caudal region of the neural tube; in a second approach, we have recorded the emergence of neural crest cells using the HNK1 monoclonal antibody; and finally, we have analyzed the developmental potentials of neural crest cells arising from the caudalmost part of the neural tube in avian embryo in in vitro culture and by means of heterotopic transplantations in vivo. We show here that neural crest cells arising from the neural tube located at the level of somites 47-53 can differentiate both in vitro and in vivo into melanocytes and Schwann cells but not into neurons. Furthermore, the neural tube located caudally to the last pair of somites (i.e. the 53rd pair) does not give rise to neural crest cells in any of the situations tested. The specific anatomical aspect of the avian spinal cord can thus be accounted for by limited developmental potentials of neural crest cells arising from the most caudal part of the neural tube.