Response of fauna in seagrass to habitat edges,patch attributes and hydrodynamics

This study has investigated the taxon‐specific responses of fauna to patch edges, and how these relate to patch attributes (patch size, seagrass biomass and water depth), and hydrodynamics in the seagrass habitat. Faunal abundances were sampled at the edge, 2 m in from the edge, and in the middle of 10 seagrass patches of variable size in Port Phillip Bay, Australia. Five of nine taxa showed edge effects. There were higher abundances at the edge compared with the middle for porcellid harpacticoids, and an increase in abundance from the edge to the middle of the patches for tanaids and isopods. For caprellid and gammarid amphipods, the edge effect varied across patches. Changes in current within the patch and patch size were related to the variability in the edge effect pattern of caprellids. None of the measured environmental variables (seagrass biomass, current and water depth) or patch size had a role in the variable edge effect pattern of gammarid amphipods. At the patch level, the distribution of six of nine taxa in this study, namely isopods, polychaetes, ‘other harpacticoids’, porcellid harpacticoids, cumaceans and gammarid amphipods, was related to differences in average water depth, average seagrass biomass and patch size. Our study indicates that the faunal response to edges cannot be generalized across seagrass habitat, and the implications of habitat area loss will vary depending on the taxon under consideration.     

Seagrass growth and patch dynamics: cross-scale morphological plasticity

By examining the spatial distribution of rhizome morphological characteristics of the seagrass Halodule wrightii, in relation to a seasonal pattern of seagrass patch dynamics, we attempted to derive a mechanistic explanation for the variety of changes exhibited by seagrass patch shapes. Rhizome morphological characteristics (mean internodal distance, branching frequency and biomass) were measured at three spatially-recognized regions (Flood edge, Center, Ebb edge) of 5 seagrass patches, reflecting position relative to hydrodynamic flow. In addition, maps (1 resolution) of the seagrass patches were used to quantify changes in seagrass patch margins across the growing season. Rhizome morphological characteristics varied with spatial position: longer internodal distances were recorded on both edges of the patch relative to patch center, and rhizomes from Flood edges exhibited longer internodes than plants on the Ebb edge of patches. Branching frequency showed no spatially-explicit distribution across the seagrass patches. Patch change analysis indicated a pattern of increase in patch area on the Flood edges of seagrass patches and recession (or no change) on the Ebb edges. Patch margin change was significantly correlated with internodal distances: the more positive the increase in patch seagrass coverage on an edge, the greater the internodal distances.Sediment nutrients were explored as a potential mechanism for the distinct spatial distribution of morphologies found; experimental addition of phosphorus, but not nitrogen, significantly altered the rhizome morphology and biomass, but measurement of ambient sediment nutrient concentrations produced no significant correlations with the in situ distribution of rhizome morphologies. These results suggest that larger-scale landscape characteristics of patch dynamics may be determined by predictable behaviors of small-scale components, but the results do not conclusively describe a mechanism for this system.     

Horizontal gradient in fish assemblage structures in and around a seagrass habitat: some implications for seagrass habitat conservation

Horizontal gradients in fish assemblage structures in and around a seagrass habitat were evaluated by visual observations. The assemblage structures clearly differed between open microhabitats lacking seagrass, i.e., nearby sand and the area adjoining the outer margin of the seagrass bed (referred to as “outer gap”), and microhabitats with seagrass within the overall seagrass bed, although not differing among the latter microhabitats, including both edge and core portions. Such open microhabitats were found to be not always inferior, but nearly equal to or even sometimes greatly superior in fish species’ diversity and/or abundance to the microhabitats with seagrass. In particular, the outer gap was always ranked first in total species’ number and had outstanding abundance in spring. Similar open microhabitats adjoining seagrass walls facing the sand patch within the seagrass bed (referred to as “inner gap”) in spring were also characterized by higher fish species and individual numbers. The 11 most abundant fishes showed four discrete distribution patterns (three recognized herein and one implied by precedent studies), such contributing to a horizontal gradient in the fish assemblage structure. While no fishes showed a preference for the edge or core of the seagrass bed, group-forming juveniles of several species favored gap microhabitats, suggesting that, in addition to the traditionally recognized edge and core microhabitats, the concept of gap microhabitats should be included in seagrass conservation ecology.     

The structure of a nearshore fish community of Western Australia: diel patterns and the habitat role of limestone reefs

Synopsis Extensive limestone reefs are a characteristic feature of much of the coastline of Western Australia, and potentially represent a major habitat feature influencing the structure of the coastal fish community. The structure and temporal dynamics of the fish fauna and its relationships to nearshore patch reefs and surrounding habitat near Dongara, Western Australia, were examined using (1) diel gill-netting and (2) quantitative rotenone sampling of enclosed areas of substratum. Long-term and day-to-day variability of the fauna was low. Dominant species of gill-net collections were either associated with reefs or occurred in similar abundances at both reefs and surrounding sand/seagrass flats. The overall abundance, number of species and biomass of netted fishes was higher around reefs. Rotenone collections of the more sedentary species showed a similar pattern, but suggested, however, that a simple reef versus surrounding sand and seagrass habitat comparison is complicated by the canopy-forming seagrass Amphibolis that occurs on reef tops. Time of day had an important effect on overall fish abundance and number of species, with peaks occurring at crepuscular periods. This reflected dusk and dawn activity peaks of a dominant species rather than overlapping activities of many diurnal and nocturnal species. Diel switches between reef-edge habitat and surrounding sand/seagrass flats were uncommon despite expectations (based on literature examples) that patch reefs would function primarily as sheltering habitats and surrounding non-reef areas act as foraging habitat. High catches at reef-edge sites suggest that the majority of fishes forage on or near limestone patch reefs. Fish densities of around 0.8 individuals per m^-2 of bottom on these Western Australian reefs are relatively high in comparison to visual census estimates obtained for temperate reef systems in South Australia and New Zealand, but similar to those obtained using comparable netting methods in temperate Australian seagrass systems.     

Magnitude of within-patch variation in seagrass Halophila ovalis growth affected by adjacent Thalassia hemprichii vegetation

Seagrass beds in South-east Asia sometimes consist of a mosaic of different species in monospecific patches. We examined whether the magnitude of within-patch variation in the seagrass Halophila ovalis is affected by the presence or absence of surrounding vegetation consisting of another seagrass species Thalassia hemprichii in an intertidal flat in Thailand waters. We measured biomass and growth rates of H. ovalis at the edges and centers of two different types of patches: (i) H. ovalis patches adjoining T. hemprichii vegetation (HT patches), and (ii) H. ovalis patches adjoining unvegetated sand flats (HS patches). Furthermore, we examined the possible effects of interspecific interactions on the growth of H. ovalis by experimentally removing adjoining T. hemprichii at the edges of HT patches. The biomass of H. ovalis was greater at the patch centre than the patch edge in both types of patches. For the growth rate of H. ovalis, significant interactions were detected between patch types and positions in patches. The difference in growth was significant and more than 4-fold between edges and centers of the HS patches, whereas the growth was not significantly different between edges and centers of the HT patches. The removal of T. hemprichii did not significantly affect the growth rate of H. ovalis at the edge of the HT patches. These findings demonstrate that the magnitude of within-patch variation in H. ovalis growth is affected by the conditions of adjoining habitats. However, any effects of local competition with T. hemprichii on H. ovalis growth were not evident in this short-term manipulative experiment.     

海草床育幼功能及其机理

海草床是近岸海域中生产力极高的生态系统,是许多海洋水生动物的重要育幼场所。从生物幼体的密度、生长率、存活率和生境迁移4个方面阐述海草床育幼功能,并从食源和捕食压力两个方面探讨海草床育幼功能机理。许多生物幼体在海草床都呈现出较高的密度、生长率和存活率,并且在个体发育到一定阶段从海草床向成体栖息环境迁移。丰富的食物来源或较低的捕食压力可能是海草床具有育幼功能的主要原因,但不同的生物幼体对海草床的利用有差异,海草床育幼功能的机理在不同环境条件下也存在差异。提出未来海草床育幼功能的重点研究方向:(1)量化海草床对成体栖息环境贡献量;(2)全球气候变化和人类活动对海草床育幼功能的影响;(3)海草床育幼功能对海草床斑块效应和边缘效应的响应,以期为促进我国海草床育幼研究和海草床生态系统保护提供依据。     

Patch edges and insect populations

Responses of insect populations may be related to patch size and patch edge responses, but it is not clear how to identify these rapidly. We used a random-walk model to identify three qualitative responses to edges: no edge effect (the null model), reflecting edges and absorbing edges. Interestingly, no edge effect meant that abundance was lower at edges than in the center of patches, and reflecting edges have similar abundance at edges and centers. We then characterized several insect species’ response within maize plots to patch edges and patch size, using a simple, quick, qualitative experiment. Coleomegilla maculata and Trichogramma spp. were the only organisms that responded to patch size and edges as patch theory and the null edge model would predict. Ostrinia nubilalis larvae and possibly Rhopalosiphum maidis and eggs of Chrysopa spp. responded to patch size and edges as predicted by an attracting edge model. Estimation of predation rates suggested that the spatial distribution of these species might be determined by predators. Edge effects or the lack thereof relative to patch size may be rapidly determined for arthropod species, which could lead to understanding the mechanism(s) underlying these effects. This information may be useful in reaction diffusion models through a scaling-up approach to predict population structure of species among patches in a landscape. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Seagrass patch size affects fish responses to edges

1.  Patch area and proximity of patch edge can influence ecological processes across patchy landscapes and may interact with each other. Different patch sizes have different amounts of core habitat, potentially affecting animal abundances at the edge and middle of patches. In this study, we tested if edge effects varied with patch size.
2.  Fish were sampled in 10 various-sized seagrass patches (114–5934 m²) using a small (0·5 m²) push net in three positions within each patch: the seagrass edge, 2 m into a patch and in the middle of a patch.
3.  The two most common species showed an interaction between patch size and the edge–interior difference in abundance. In the smallest patches, pipefish ( Stigmatopora nigra ) were at similar densities at the edge and interior, but with increasing patch size, the density at the edge habitat increased. For gobies ( Nesogobius maccullochi ), the pattern was exactly the opposite.
4.  This is the first example from a marine system of how patch size can influence the magnitude and pattern of edge effects.
5.  Both patch area and edge effects need to be considered in the development of conservation and management strategies for seagrass habitats.     

Effects of seagrass habitat fragmentation on juvenile blue crab survival and abundance

Seagrasses form temporally dynamic, fragmented subtidal landscapes in which both large- and small-scale habitat structure may influence faunal survival and abundance. We compared the relative influences of seagrass (Zostera marina L.) habitat fragmentation (patch size and isolation) and structural complexity (shoot density) on juvenile blue crab (Callinectes sapidus Rathbun) survival and density in a Chesapeake Bay seagrass meadow. We tethered crabs to measure relative survival, suction sampled for crabs to measure density, and took seagrass cores to measure shoot density in patches spanning six orders of magnitude (ca. 0.25-30,000 m²) both before (June) and after (September) seasonally predictable decreases in seagrass structural complexity and increases in seagrass fragmentation. We also determined if juvenile blue crab density and seagrass shoot density varied between the edge and the interior of patches. In June, juvenile blue crab survival was not linearly related to seagrass patch size or to shoot density, but was significantly lower in patches separated by large expanses of unvegetated sediment (isolated patches) than in patches separated by <1 m of unvegetated sediment (connected patches). In September, crab survival was inversely correlated with seagrass shoot density. This inverse correlation was likely due to density-dependent predation by juvenile conspecifics (i.e. cannibalism); juvenile blue crab density increased with seagrass shoot density, was inversely correlated with crab survival, and was greater in September than in June. Shoot density effects on predator behavior and on conspecific density also likely caused crab survival to be lower in isolated patches than in connected patches in June. Isolated patches were either large (patch area >3000 m²) or very small (<1 m²). Large isolated patches had the lowest shoot densities, which may have allowed predators to easily find tethered crabs. Very small isolated patches had the highest shoot densities and consequently a high abundance of predators (=juvenile conspecifics). Though shoot density did not differ between the edge and the interior of patches, crabs were more abundant in the interior of patches than at the edge. These results indicate that seagrass fragmentation does not have an overriding influence on juvenile blue crab survival and density, and that crab cannibalism and seasonal changes in landscape structure may influence relationships between crab survival and seagrass habitat structure. Habitat fragmentation, structural complexity, faunal density, and time all must be incorporated into future studies on faunal survival in seagrass landscapes.     

Modification of animal habitat by large plants: mechanisms by which seagrasses influence clam growth

Summary Field experiments withMercenaria mercenaria in a relatively high-energy environment demonstrated that clams on unvegetated sand flats failed to grow during autumn while those within seagrass beds grew substantially. Clam growth rates at the seagrass margin that first receives the faster-flowing, flood-tidal currents were about 25% less than at the opposite edge. In a second experiment, pruning, which reduced average blade length by 50–75%, was shown to enhance near-bottom current velocities and to reduce shell growth ofMercenaria during summer by about 50%. As in the first experiment, clams in the unvegetated sand flats exhibited no net growth. Clam mortality, caused mostly by predatory crabs and whelks, was much higher on sand flats than in seagrass beds and intermediate in clipped seagrass. Although consistent with some previous reports, these growth results are still surprising given that they contradict the generalization that suspension feeders grow faster under more rapid current regimes.Three types of indirect interactions might explain the observed effect of seagrass on growth of buried clams: (1) altering food supply; (2) changing the intensity of biological disturbance on feeding clams; and/or (3) affecting the physical stability of the sediments. Previous research on this question has focused almost exclusively on processes that alter food supply rates. In this study, food concentrations, as indicated by suspended chla, were 30% higher inside than outside one seagrass bed, whereas chla concentrations in two other beds were not different from those on adjacent sand flats. This result is sufficient to show that more intense food depletion was not induced by the reduction in flow velocities under the seagrass canopy. Nevertheless, the possible small difference in food concentrations between vegetated and unvegetated bottom seems insufficient to explain the absence of growth of sand-flat clams, especially given the virtual lack of food limitation among suspension feeders in this system. Two data sets demonstrated that the effects of biological disturbance agents cannot be ignored. An outdoor laboratory experiment showed that even in the absence of physical contact between predator and prey the presence of a whelk reduces the amount of time spent feeding byMercenaria. This result suggests that sand flats, where predation rates are higher, may be sites of lower clam growth than seagrass beds because of greater consumer interference with clam feeding. Furthermore, clam siphons are proportionately larger inside seagrass than on sand flats, implying that siphon nipping may not be as intense inside seagrass. This process, too, would reduce net growth of sand-flat clams. Finally, no explicit test was conducted of the hypothesis that enhanced sediment transport in the absence of flow baffling and root binding by seagrass inhibits net growth of clams on high-energy sand flats. Nevertheless, this is a reasonable explanation for the pattern of enhanced growth of seagrass clams, and could serve to explain the otherwise unexplained pattern of lower clam growth at the edge of the seagrass bed that experiences the faster flood-tidal current velocities. Each broad process, changing fluid dynamics, altering consumer access, and varying sediment stability, represents a mechanism whereby habitat structure, provided by the dominant plant, has an important indirect influence on the functional value of the habitat for resident animals.     

Relative influence of habitat complexity and proximity to patch edges on seagrass epifaunal communities

Habitat structure at many scales influences faunal communities. Although habitat structure at different scales often covaries, studies rarely examine the relative effects of structure at multiple scales on faunal density and diversity. In shallow‐water seagrass systems, epifaunal density at local scales generally increases with increased habitat structural complexity (e.g. shoot density per unit area). In turn, structural complexity often varies with other aspects of habitat structure at patch scales, such as proximity to patch edges, which itself modifies ecological processes that structure epifaunal communities. We conducted surveys and a manipulative experiment in the eelgrass Zostera marina beds of San Diego Bay, California, USA, to determine (1) whether eelgrass structural complexity, epifaunal density and diversity, and fish (predator) density and diversity vary with proximity to patch edges, and (2) the relative influences of structural complexity, proximity to patch edges and predator presence on epifaunal distribution. Seagrass structural complexity generally increased from patch edges to patch interiors at all sites and in all sampling periods. However, patterns of epifaunal density, diversity, and biomass varied among sites and sampling periods, with density and biomass increasing from patch edges to interiors at some sites and decreasing at others. In the manipulative experiment, we allowed epifauna to colonize sparse or dense artificial seagrass habitat at both the edge and interior of a seagrass patch, and enclosed a subset of experimental units in predator exclusion cages. Overall, proximity to patch edges had a larger influence on epifaunal density and community structure than did structural complexity or predation, with the exception of some common taxa which responded more strongly to either complexity or predator exclusion. Our results emphasize the importance of addressing and evaluating habitat structure at multiple scales to better understand the distribution and interactions of organisms in a particular environment.     

Benthic Crustacea from tropical and temperate reef locations: differences in assemblages and their relationship with habitat structure

Tropical and temperate marine habitats have long been recognised as fundamentally different system, yet comparative studies are rare, particularly for small organisms such as Crustacea. This study investigates the ecological attributes (abundance, biomass and estimated productivity) of benthic Crustacea in selected microhabitats from a tropical and a temperate location, revealing marked differences in the crustacean assemblages. In general, microhabitats from the tropical location (dead coral, the epilithic algal matrix [algal turfs] and sand) supported high abundances of small individuals (mean length = 0.53 mm vs. 0.96 mm in temperate microhabitats), while temperate microhabitats (the brown seaweed Carpophyllum sp., coralline turf and sand) had substantially greater biomasses of crustaceans and higher estimated productivity rates. In both locations, the most important microhabitats for crustaceans (per unit area) were complex structures: tropical dead coral and temperate Carpophyllum sp. It appears that the differences between microhabitats are largely driven by the size and relative abundance of key crustacean groups. Temperate microhabitats have a higher proportion of relatively large Peracarida (Amphipoda and Isopoda), whereas tropical microhabitats are dominated by small detrital- and microalgal-feeding crustaceans (harpacticoid copepods and ostracods). These differences highlight the vulnerability of tropical and temperate systems to the loss of complex benthic structures and their associated crustacean assemblages.

     

Spatial variation of intertidal macroinvertebrates and environmental variables in Robbins Passage wetlands,NW Tasmania

Macroinvertebrate composition, abundance and biomass were investigated at four intertidal sites throughout the Robbins Passage wetlands, Tasmania, over a 12-month period, in order to identify differences among and within sites, and to determine whether environmental variables could explain these differences. As this region is the most important shorebird area in Tasmania, we wanted to quantify the potential food source for shorebirds within the wetlands. Thirty-five taxa from 28,928 individuals were identified, with a mean abundance of 6026.6 ind m⁻² and biomass of 27.1 gDW m⁻². Bivalves and gastropods dominated the assemblage in terms of abundance and biomass (79% and 60%, respectively). There was a significant interaction among tidal level, site and season for invertebrate abundance and diversity, while biomass differed significantly among sites. In general, the mid-intertidal stratum had the greatest invertebrate density and diversity, while the low intertidal stratum had the greatest biomass. Community composition varied among the four sites, with the bivalve Paphies elongata dominating at two of the sites, while gastropods and polychaetes were more abundant at the other sites. Differences in invertebrate composition and abundance could partly be explained by seagrass biomass, i.e., dry mass of seagrass leaves and roots. Areas with seagrass had increased invertebrate abundance and diversity, but mean sediment particle size, % organic carbon and % seagrass cover had no significant effect. These results will assist in the investigation of habitat use by shorebirds and the identification of important shorebird feeding areas within the wetlands. Handling editor: P. Viaroli     

Evaluating the impact of predation by fish on the assemblage structure of fishes associated with seagrass (Heterozostera tasmanica) (Martens ex Ascherson) den Hartog, and unvegetated sand habitats

The role of fish predation in structuring assemblages of fish over unvegetated sand and seagrass was examined using enclosure and exclusion cages to manipulate the abundance of predatory fish from November 1998 to January 1999. In our exclusion experiment, piscivorous fish were excluded from patches of unvegetated sand and seagrass to measure how they altered abundances of small fishes, i.e., fish <10 cm in length. Habitats from which piscivorous fish were excluded contained more small fish than those with partial cages, which in turn contained more fish than uncaged areas. These patterns were consistent between unvegetated sand and seagrass areas, although the relative differences between predator treatments varied with habitat. Overall, small fish were more abundant in unvegetated sand than seagrass. Atherinids and syngnathids were the numerically dominant families of small fish and varied in complex ways amongst habitats and cage treatments. The abundance of atherinids varied inconsistently between cage treatments through time. Only during the final two sampling times did the abundance of atherinids vary significantly across cage treatments. Syngnathids were strongly associated with seagrass and were significantly more abundant in caged than uncaged habitats. In our enclosure experiment, five individuals of a single species of transient piscivorous fish, Western Australian salmon (Arripidae: Arripis truttacea Cuvier), were enclosed in cages to provide an estimate of the potential for this species to impact on small fish. The abundance of small fish varied significantly between cage treatments. Small fish were more abundant in enclosure cages and exclusion cages than uncaged areas; however, there was no difference in the abundance of small fish in enclosure cages and partial cages, and no difference between exclusion cages and partial cages. These patterns were consistent amongst habitats. Atherinids and syngnathids were again the numerically dominant families of small fish; atherinids varied more with cage structure while syngnathids did not vary statistically between cages, blocks (locations within which a single replicate of each cage treatment was applied) or habitats. Dietary analysis of caged A. truttacea demonstrated the potential for this species to influence the assemblage structure of small fish through predation - atherinids were consumed more frequently in unvegetated sand than seagrass, and syngnathids were consumed only in seagrass, where they are most abundant. Observations of significant cage or predation effects depended strongly on the time at which sampling was undertaken. In the case of the atherinids, no predation or cage effects were observed during the first two sampling times, but cage effects and predation effects strongly influenced abundances of fish during the third and fourth sampling times, respectively. Our study suggests that transient piscivorous fish may be important in structuring assemblages of small fish in seagrass and unvegetated sand, and seagrass beds may provide a refuge to fishes. But the importance of habitat complexity and predation, in relation to the potentially confounding effects of cage structure, depends strongly on the time at which treatments are sampled, and the periodicity and multiplicity of sampling should be considered in future predation studies.     

Benthic fauna associated to a Thalassia testudinum (Hydrocharitaceae) bed in Parque Nacional Morrocoy, Venezuela

The benthic fauna and diel variation in a shallow seagrass bed (Thalassia testudinum) were studied in Playa Mero, Venezuela. Samples of organisms and sediments were taken using PVC cylinders, 5cm in diameter, along a transect perpendicular to the coast. Seagrass cover, shoot density and biomass were estimated. The seagrass cover was homogeneous along the transect. The intermediate zone had the highest number of shoots and of above-ground and rhizome biomass. Composition and abundance of benthic organisms were related with seagrass and sediment characteristics. Sediment organic matter content and organism abundance were highest near the shore Molluscs, polychaetes, oligochaetes and nematodes were the most abundant groups. Species richness was higher in daytime (40 versus 28 at night). Gastropods were the most abundant organisms both at day and night while polychaetes and crustaceans increased during the day, and holoturids were more numerous at night.     

The effects of seagrass (Zostera japonica) canopy structure on associated fauna: a study using artificial seagrass units and sampling of natural beds

The importance of seagrass canopy to associated fauna was assessed by comparing the species richness, abundance and diversity of the epi- and infaunal macroinvertebrate assemblages in a seagrass (Zostera japonica Ascherson and Graebner) bed and the adjacent unvegetated area in Hong Kong. Seagrass cover had significant effects on the composition and abundance of the associated fauna and the amount of detritus accumulated on the sediment surface. Detritus abundance was significantly higher in the seagrass bed, and was positively correlated with both the above- and belowground biomass of Z. japonica. Both the abundance and species richness of the epi- and infauna were significantly positively correlated with the belowground biomass of the seagrass and detritus standing crop. Macrofaunal species richness was higher (118) in the seagrass bed than the adjacent unvegetated areas (70), with a higher degree of similarity between the infauna than the epifauna of the two habitats. While all species recorded from the unvegetated areas were found in the seagrass bed, 48 species occurred only in the seagrass-covered areas. Species richness of epifauna was significantly higher in the seagrass bed, but there was no difference between infaunal species of the two habitats. On the contrary, faunal (epi- and infauna) abundance was significantly higher in seagrass areas. The seagrass bed also supported species of small tellinid bivalves previously not recorded from Hong Kong. Artificial seagrass units (ASUs, 0.2 m(2)) with four combinations of leaf density and leaf length and a control (bare sand) were placed at short distances from natural patches of Z. japonica. The composition, abundance and biomass of the epibenthos associated with the ASUs and the control were recorded after 3 months in the field. While species richness did not differ among the treatments, total abundance of epibenthos was significantly higher in the high density-long leaves (HL) treatment than in the control. Results of a discriminant analysis using log-transformed abundance data suggest that the gastropod Clithon oualaniensis, the mussel Musculista senhousia and the crab Thalamita sp. were important species distinguishing the assemblages in the various treatments. All the three species were significantly more abundant in the HL treatment than in the low density-short leaves (LS) treatment and the control. By contrast, there was no significant difference in the biomass of the epifauna, but discriminant analysis again separated the five treatments based on the composition of the biomass, with the same three species identified as the most important discriminating species. The species richness and abundance of the epifauna associated with the ASUs were similar to the adjacent unvegetated areas, but significantly lower than in the Zostera patches. The physical canopy structure of Z. japonica beds increased the abundance of the epibenthos, potentially through provision of canopy and indirectly through trapping of detritus.     

Spatial variation in abundance of prey and diet of trumpeter (Pelates sexlineatus: Teraponidae) associated with Zostera capricorni seagrass meadows

Abstract The diet of juveniles of Pelates sexlineatus was examined at six estuaries, separated by tens to hundreds of kilometres, and two sites within each estuary, separated by hundreds of metres to kilometres. Fish were collected in Zostera capricorni seagrass meadows along the coast of New South Wales (Australia). Spatial variability in diet was compared with the abundance of prey. Pelates sexlineatus had a broad diet (27 different prey) but generally preferred crustaceans (harpacticoid copepods, gammarid amphipods, ostracods and tanaids), although at some sites other prey items were important (e.g. polychaetes, nematodes and foraminiferans). Composition of the diet varied among estuaries and between sites. Proportional representation of the different size of prey eaten by the three sizes of juveniles (40‐ 54 , 55–74 and 75–94 mm standard length) was similar. Fish generally preferred prey smaller than 1 mm. Abundance of prey also varied at both spatial scales. At five of the 12 sites, there was a significant correlation between abundance of prey in the seagrass meadows and abundance of prey in the diet. Variation in the composition of the diet was partly explained by spatial variation in abundance of prey. When crustaceans were not abundant in the seagrass, P. sexlineatus had a broad diet, taking both benthic and planktonic prey items. It is concluded therefore that trophic linkages between P. sexlineatus and benthic invertebrates may vary greatly with spatial scales from hundreds of metres to hundreds of kilometres, and are strongly related to availability of prey in seagrass habitats.     

Review of the effects of within-patch scale structural complexity on seagrass fishes

Studies on the effects of within-patch scale structure of seagrass habitats on predator–prey fish interactions and abundance/habitat use patterns were reviewed. Most laboratory experiments have employed chase-and-attack predators, usually resulting in lower foraging efficiency in (denser) seagrass. However, a few laboratory procedures employed alternative foraging tactics, resulting in no differences in prey mortality rates. Field studies did not always result in lower prey mortality rates in seagrass habitats. Accordingly, it is premature to conclude that seagrass presence is almost always negatively related to predator foraging efficiency or that increasing seagrass abundance is usually associated with a decrease in predator efficiency. Because several categories of predator and prey fishes occur in seagrass habitats, further studies are needed with all of these predator–prey combinations, in order to fully clarify predator–prey fish interactions in association with seagrass structure. Seagrass fishes have been shown to respond to alterations in seagrass structure in various ways: seagrass height and/or density reduction or clearance resulted in decreased abundance of some species but increases or no change in others. Some explanations have been proposed, not all mutually exclusive, for these phenomena. Although within-patch scale processes have been well studied, room exists for improvement. For example, predator–prey fish interactions in relation to varying within-patch scale complexity is not yet fully understand. The relationships of patch size, edge effects and within-patch scale complexity also still remain unclear. Further studies, which add to the clarification of within-patch scale process, will in turn improve our understanding of larger spatial scale processes.     

Edge effects in patchy seagrass landscapes: The role of predation in determining fish distribution

Predation is often described as an underlying mechanism to explain edge effects. We assessed the importance of predation in determining edge effects in seagrass using two approaches: a video survey to sample predators at small scales across seagrass edges, and a tethering experiment to determine if predation was an underlying mechanism causing edge effects. Underwater videos were placed at four positions: middle of seagrass patches; edge of seagrass; sand immediately adjacent to seagrass and sand distant from seagrass. Fish abundances and the time fish spent in view were measured. The main predatory fish (Australian salmon, Arripis spp.) spent more time over adjacent sand than other positions, while potential prey species (King George whiting, Sillaginodes punctata (Cuvier), recruits) were more common in the middle of seagrass patches. Other species, including the smooth toadfish, Tetractenos glaber (Freminville), and King George whiting adults, spent more time over sand adjacent to seagrass than distant sand, which may be related to feeding opportunities. King George whiting recruits and pipefish (Stigmatopora spp.) were tethered at each of the four positions. More whiting recruits were preyed upon at outer than inner seagrass patches, and survival time was greater in the middle of shallow seagrass patches than other positions. Relatively few pipefish were preyed upon, but of those that were, survival time was lower over sand adjacent to seagrass than at the seagrass edge or middle. Video footage revealed that salmon were the dominant predators of both tethered King George whiting recruits and pipefish. The distribution of predators and associated rate of predation can explain edge effects for some species (King George whiting) but other mechanisms, or combinations of mechanisms, are determining edge effects for other species (pipefish).     

Trophic cascades in a temperate seagrass community

We assessed the relative importance of bottom–up and top–down processes in structuring an eelgrass community in Sweden, a system impacted both by eutrophication and overfishing. Using artificial seagrass as substrate, we manipulated nutrient levels and predator abundance in a full‐factorial cage‐experiment. The results revealed a seagrass community dominated by strong top–down processes controlling the aggregate biomass of mesograzers and macroalgae. In the absence of predators the large amphipod Gammarus locusta became very abundant resulting in a leaf community with low biomass of algae and smaller mobile fauna. One enclosed gobid fish predator reduced the abundance of adult G. locusta by >90%, causing a three to six times increase in the biomass of algae, smaller mesograzers and meiofauna. Numerous small predators in uncaged habitats reduced the biomass of G. locusta and other mesograzers by >95% in comparison to the fish treatment, further increasing the biomass of epiphytic algae and meiofauna. Although water column nutrient enrichment caused a temporal bloom of the filamentous macroalgae Ulva spp., no significant nutrient‐effects were found on the algal community at the end of the experiment. The only lasting nutrient‐effect was a significant increase in the biomass of G. locusta, but only in the absence of ambient predators. These results demonstrate that mesograzers can respond to enhanced food supply, increase their biomass and control the algal growth when predation rates are low. However, in the assessed system, high predation rates appear to make mesograzers functionally extinct, causing a community‐wide trophic cascade that promotes the growth of ephemeral algae. This top–down effect could penetrate down, despite a complex food‐web because the interaction strength in the community was strongly skewed towards two functionally dominant algal and grazer species that were vulnerable to consumption. These results indicate that overexploitation of gadoid fish may be linked to increased macroalgal blooms and loss of eelgrass in the area through a trophic cascade affecting the abundance of mesograzers.