Differences in Contacts of RNA Polymerases from <Emphasis Type="Italic">Escherichia coli</Emphasis> and <Emphasis Type="Italic">Thermus aquaticus</Emphasis> with <Emphasis Type="Italic">lac</Emphasis>UV5 Promoter Are Determined by Core-Enzyme of RNA Polymerase

The interaction of RNA polymerases from Escherichia coli and Thermus aquaticus with lacUV5 promoter was studied at various temperatures. Using DNA-protein cross-linking induced by formaldehyde, it was demonstrated that each RNA polymerase formed a unique pattern of contacts with DNA in the open promoter complex. In the case of E. coli RNA polymerase, beta and sigma subunits were involved into formation of cross-links with the promoter, whereas in the case of T. aquaticus RNA polymerase its beta subunit formed the cross-links with the promoter. A cross-linking pattern in promoter complexes of a hybrid holoenzyme comprised of the core-enzyme of E. coli and sigma subunit of T. aquaticus was similar to that of the E. coli holoenzyme. This suggests that DNA-protein contacts in the promoter complex are primarily determined by the core-enzyme of RNA polymerase. However, temperature-dependent behavior of contact formation is determined by the sigma subunit. Results of the present study indicate that the method of formaldehyde cross-linking can be employed for elucidation of differences in the structure of promoter complexes of RNA polymerases from various bacteria.     

Intermediates in the formation of the open complex by RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing the sigma factor sigma 32 at the groE promoter

The interaction of E sigma 32 with the groE promoter at temperatures between 0 degrees C and 37 degrees C was studied using DNase I footprinting and dimethyl sulfate methylation. Three distinct complexes were observed. At 0 degrees C E sigma 32 fully protected sequences between -60 and -5 from DNase I digestion on the top (non-template) strand of the promoter. At 16 degrees C the majority of the E sigma 32 promoter complexes had a DNase I footprint almost identical with that seen at 37 degrees C, protecting the DNA from about -60 to +20; however, little DNA strand separation had occurred, and the changes in sensitivity of guanine residues to dimethyl sulfate methylation caused by E sigma 32 differed from those seen at 37 degrees C. DNA strand separation, and changes in the pattern of protections from and enhancements of methylation by dimethyl sulfate to those characteristic of the open complex, occurred at temperatures between 16 degrees C and 27 degrees C. It is plausible to assume that these temperature-dependent isomerizations are analogous to the time-dependent sequence of intermediates on the pathway to open complex formation at 37 degrees C. Therefore we propose that the formation of an open complex by E sigma 32 at the groE promoter involves three classes of steps: E sigma 32 initially binds to the promoter in a closed complex (RPC1) in which the enzyme interacts with a smaller region of the DNA than in the open complex. E sigma 32 then isomerizes to form a second closed complex (RPC2) in which the enzyme interacts with the same region of the DNA as in the open complex. Finally, a process of local DNA denaturation (strand opening) leads to formation of the open complex (RPO).     

Development of RNA polymerase-promoter contacts during open complex formation.

We have charted the movements of E sigma 32 RNA polymerase at the heat-shock promoter PgroE throughout open complex formation, using hydroxyl radical footprinting. In combination with methylation protection and DNase I experiments, these data suggest the following model for open complex formation. E sigma 32 initially anchors itself in the upstream region of the promoter forming the first closed complex, RPC1; in this complex the enzyme makes backbone contacts in the -35 region of the promoter that are maintained throughout open complex formation. An isomerization follows resulting in a second closed complex, RPC2; in this complex the enzyme makes base-specific and backbone contacts in the -10 region that are almost identical to those found in the open complex. Thus, at the groE promoter, upstream contacts are established in RPC1 and downstream contacts in RPC2. A similar pattern of backbone contacts was obtained for E sigma 32 bound in the open complex at two additional heat-shock promoters, suggesting that the overall topology of holoenzyme in the open complex is similar regardless of sequence variations in the promoter.     

Laser cross-linking of nucleic acids to proteins. Methodology and first applications to the phage T4 DNA replication system

Single-pulse (approximately 8 ns) ultraviolet laser excitation of protein-nucleic acid complexes can result in efficient and rapid covalent cross-linking of proteins to nucleic acids. The reaction produces no nucleic acid-nucleic acid or protein-protein cross-links, and no nucleic acid degradation. The efficiency of cross-linking is dependent on the wavelength of the exciting radiation, on the nucleotide composition of the nucleic acid, and on the total photon flux. The yield of cross-links/laser pulse is largest between 245 and 280 nm; cross-links are obtained with far UV photons (200-240 nm) as well, but in this range appreciable protein degradation is also observed. The method has been calibrated using the phage T4-coded gene 32 (single-stranded DNA-binding) protein interaction with oligonucleotides, for which binding constants have been measured previously by standard physical chemical methods (Kowalczykowski, S. C., Lonberg, N., Newport, J. W., and von Hippel, P. H. (1981) J. Mol. Biol. 145, 75-104). Photoactivation occurs primarily through the nucleotide residues of DNA and RNA at excitation wavelengths greater than 245 nm, with reaction through thymidine being greatly favored. The nucleotide residues may be ranked in order of decreasing photoreactivity as: dT much greater than dC greater than rU greater than rC, dA, dG. Cross-linking appears to be a single-photon process and occurs through single nucleotide (dT) residues; pyrimidine dimer formation is not involved. Preliminary studies of the individual proteins of the five-protein T4 DNA replication complex show that gene 43 protein (polymerase), gene 32 protein, and gene 44 and 45 (polymerase accessory) proteins all make contact with DNA, and can be cross-linked to it, whereas gene 62 (polymerase accessory) protein cannot. A survey of other nucleic acid-binding proteins has shown that E. coli RNA polymerase, DNA polymerase I, and rho protein can all be cross-linked to various nucleic acids by the laser technique. The potential uses of this procedure in probing protein-nucleic acid interactions are discussed.