Juxtamembrane region of the amino terminus of the corticotropin releasing factor receptor type 1 is important for ligand interaction

The functional properties of the amino terminus (NT) of the corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) receptor type 1 (R1) were studied by use of murine (m) CRFR1 and rat (r) parathyroid hormone (PTH)/parathyroid hormone-related peptide receptor (PTH1R) chimeras. The chimeric receptor CXP, in which the NT of mCRFR1 was annealed to the TMs of PTH1R, and the reciprocal hybrid, PXC, bound radiolabeled analogues of sauvagine and PTH(3--34), respectively. Neither hybrid bound radiolabeled CRF or PTH(1--34). CRF and PTH(1--34) weakly stimulated intracellular cAMP accumulation in COS-7 cells transfected with PXC and CXP, respectively. Thus the NT is required for ligand binding and the TMs are required for agonist-stimulated cAMP accumulation. Replacing individual intercysteine segments of PXC with their mCRFR1 counterparts did not rescue CRF or sauvagine radioligand binding or stimulation of cAMP accumulation. Replacement of residues 1--31 of mCRFR1 with their PTH1R counterparts resulted in a chimeric receptor, PEC, which had normal CRFR1 functional properties. In addition, a series of chimeras (F1PEC--F6PEC) were generated by replacement of the NT intercysteine residues of PEC with their PTH1R counterparts. Only F1PEC, F2PEC, and F3PEC showed detectable CRF and sauvagine radioligand binding. All of the PEC chimeras except F5PEC increased cAMP accumulation. These data indicate that the Cys(68)(-)Glu(109) domain is important for binding and that the Cys(87)(-)Cys(102) region plays an important role in CRFR1 activation.     

Residues of corticotropin releasing factor-binding protein (CRF-BP) that selectively abrogate binding to CRF but not to urocortin 1

Corticotropin releasing factor-binding protein (CRF-BP) binds CRF and urocortin 1 (Ucn 1) with high affinity, thus preventing CRF receptor (CRFR) activation. Despite recent progress on the molecular details that govern interactions between CRF family neuropeptides and their cognate receptors, little is known concerning the mechanisms that allow CRF-BP to bind CRF and Ucn 1 with picomolar affinity. We conducted a comprehensive alanine scan of 76 evolutionarily conserved residues of CRF-BP and identified several residues that differentially affected the affinity for CRF over Ucn 1. We determined that both neuropeptides derive their similarly high affinity from distinct binding surfaces on CRF-BP. Alanine substitutions of arginine 56 (R56A) and aspartic acid 62 (D62A) reduce the affinity for CRF by approximately 100-fold, while only marginally affecting the affinity for Ucn 1. The selective reduction in affinity for CRF depends on glutamic acid 25 in the CRF peptide, as substitution of Glu(25) reduces the affinity for CRF-BP by approximately 2 orders of magnitude, but only in the presence of both Arg(56) and Asp(62) in human CRF-BP. We show that CRF-BP(R56A) and CRF-BP(D62A) have lost the ability to inhibit CRFR1-mediated responses to CRF that activate luciferase induction in HEK293T cells and ACTH release from cultured rat anterior pituitary cells. In contrast, both CRF-BP mutants retain the ability to inhibit Ucn 1-induced CRFR1 activation. Collectively our findings demonstrate that CRF-BP has distinct and separable binding surfaces for CRF and Ucn 1, opening new avenues for the design of ligand-specific antagonists based on CRF-BP.     

High-affinity binding of urocortin and astressin but not CRF to G protein-uncoupled CRFR1

The structure-activity relationship (SAR) between the recently identified neuropeptide urocortin (Ucn) and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor, type 1 (CRFR1), has been investigated. To this end, rat Ucn (rUcn), ovine CRF (oCRF) and chimeric peptides of rUcn and oCRF were synthesized and tested for their binding affinity and potency to stimulate cAMP production in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells stably transfected with cDNA encoding rat CRFR1 (rCRFR1). In binding studies with [125I-TyrO]oCRF or [3H-Leu9]rUcn as radioligand, it was observed that rUcn but not oCRF bound in a similar fashion as the CRF antagonist astressin with high affinity to rCRFR1 coupled to G protein or uncoupled from G protein by guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS). Consequently, rUcn was found to exert a significantly lower potency than oCRF to stimulate cAMP accumulation in transfected cells. CD spectroscopic investigations and reverse-phase HPLC (RPHPLC) retention behavior of the peptides suggested a more pronounced amphipatic alpha-helical character of rUcn when compared to oCRF and the chimeric peptides.     

A soluble form of the first extracellular domain of mouse type 2beta corticotropin-releasing factor receptor reveals differential ligand specificity

The heptahelical receptors for corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), CRFR1 and CRFR2, display different specificities for CRF family ligands: CRF and urocortin I bind to CRFR1 with high affinity, whereas urocortin II and III bind to this receptor with very low affinities. In contrast, all the urocortins bind with high affinities, and CRF binds with lower affinity to CRFR2. The first extracellular domain (ECD1) of CRFR1 is important for ligand recognition. Here, we characterize a bacterially expressed soluble protein, ECD1-CRFR2beta, corresponding to the ECD1 of mouse CRFR2beta. The K(i) values for binding to ECD1-CRFR2beta are: astressin = 10.7 (5.4-21.1) nm, urocortin I = 6.4 (4.7-8.7) nm, urocortin II = 6.9 (5.8-8.3) nm, CRF = 97 (22-430) nm, urocortin III = sauvagine >200 nm. These affinities are similar to those for binding to a chimeric receptor in which the ECD1 of CRFR2beta replaces the ECD of the type 1B activin receptor (ALK4). The ECD1-CRFR2beta possesses a disulfide arrangement identical to that of the ECD1 of CRFR1, namely Cys(45)-Cys(70), Cys(60)-Cys(103), and Cys(84)-Cys(118). As determined by circular dichroism, ECD1-CRFR2beta undergoes conformational changes upon binding astressin. These data reinforce the importance of the ECD1 of CRF receptors for ligand recognition and raise the interesting possibility that different ligands having similar affinity for the full-length receptor may, nevertheless, have different affinities for microdomains of the receptor.     

Contribution of conserved polar glutamine, asparagine and threonine residues and glycosylation to agonist action at human P2X1 receptors for ATP

The role of conserved polar glutamine, asparagine and threonine residues in the large extracellular loop, and glycosylation, to agonist action at human P2X1 receptors was tested by generating alanine substitution mutants. For the majority of mutants (Q56A, Q95A, T104A, T109A, Q112A, Q114A, T146A, N153A, T158A, N184A, N191A, N242A, N300A) alanine substitution had no effect on ATP potency. The mutants Q95A, Q112A, Q114A and T158A showed changes in efficacy for the partial agonists BzATP and Ap5A, suggesting that these polar residues may contribute to the gating of the channel. The mutants T186A, N204A and N290A had six-, three- and 60-fold decreases in ATP potency, respectively. For T186A and N290A, the partial agonists BzATP and Ap5A were no longer agonists but still bind to the receptor as shown by the ability to modulate the response to co-applied ATP. N153, N184 and N242 are glycosylated in the endoplasmic reticulum and N300 acquires complex glycosylation in the golgi. These results aid in refining a model for ATP binding at the P2X1 receptor where the residues F185T186, and the conserved triplet N290F291R292, are likely to play a role in ATP action at the receptor.     

Deletion of specific glycan chains affects differentially the stability, local structures, and activity of lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase

The enzymatic and interfacial binding activity of lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) is affected differentially by the location and extent of its glycosylation. Two LCAT glycosylation-deficient mutants, N84Q and N384Q, were constructed, permanently expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells, and purified to determine the effects of deleting individual glycan chains on its stability, structure, and function. These purified mutants were studied by spectroscopic structural methods and enzymatic and binding assays to develop a molecular rationale for the relationship between LCAT glycosylation and activity. The N84Q LCAT mutant did not possess measurable enzymatic activity or interfacial binding affinity for reconstituted high-density lipoproteins. In addition, in thermal and chemical denaturation studies, N84Q LCAT was found to be significantly less stable than wild-type LCAT. The N384Q variant was initially more enzymatically active than wild-type LCAT, but gradually lost activity within months; however, it retained full interfacial binding activity. Significant changes were detected over time by circular dichroism in the alpha-helical content of N384Q LCAT and in the beta-sheet content of N84Q LCAT, compared with wild-type LCAT. Fluorescence measurements with the probe 1-anilinonapthalene-8-sulfonate suggested an alteration of the active site cavity in both mutants. In conclusion, both mutants lost catalytic activity, N84Q shortly after purification and N384Q more gradually, and were destabilized, probably because the deletion of the glycan chains altered local structural elements near the active site cavity and/or the interfacial binding regions.     

Glycosylation of human CRLR at Asn123 is required for ligand binding and signaling

Calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CRLR) constitutes either a CGRP receptor when complexed with receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1) or an adrenomedullin receptor when complexed with RAMP2 or RAMP3. RAMP proteins modify the glycosylation status of CRLR and determine their receptor specificity; when treated with tunicamycin, a glycosylation inhibitor, CHO-K1 cells constitutively expressing both RAMP2 and CRLR lost the capacity to bind adrenomedullin. Similarly, in HEK293 EBNA cells constitutively expressing RAMP1/CRLR receptor complex CGRP binding was remarkably inhibited. Whichever RAMP protein was co-expressing with CRLR, the ligand binding was sensitive to tunicamycin. There are three putative Asn-linked glycosylation sites in the extracellular, amino terminal domain of CRLR at positions 66, 118 and 123. Analysis of CRLR mutants in which Gln was substituted for selected Asn residues showed that glycosylation of Asn123 is required for both the binding of adrenomedullin and the transduction of its signal. Substituting Asn66 or Asn118 had no effect. FACS analysis of cells expressing FLAG-tagged CRLRs showed that disrupting Asn-linked glycosylation severely affected the transport of the CRLR protein to the cell surface on N66/118/123Q mutant, and slightly reduced the level of the cell surface expression of N123Q mutant compared with wild-type CRLR. But other single mutants (N66Q, N118Q) had no effect for other single mutants. Our data shows that glycosylation of Asn66 and Asn118 is not essential for ligand binding, signal transduction and cell surface expression, and Asn123 is important for ligand binding and signal transduction rather than cell surface expression. It thus appears that glycosylation of Asn123 is required for CRLR to assume the appropriate conformation on the cell surface through its interaction with RAMPs.     

An oxidation resistant radioligand for corticotropin-releasing factor receptors.

The methionine residues in Tyr-corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and Tyr-sauvagine radioligands are subject to oxidation, which renders them biologically inactive. Therefore [Tyr(0,) Gln(1,) Leu(17)]sauvagine (YQLS), in which the methionine was replaced with leucine was synthesized and labeled with (125)Iodine using chloramine-T. Mass spectroscopy revealed that chloramine-T-treatment did not oxidize YQLS. (125)I-YQLS bound with high affinity to cells expressing the murine CRF receptor 1 (CRFR1), CRF receptor 2 (CRFR2), and the mouse brain regions known to express both CRF receptors. (125)I-YQLS chemically cross-linked to CRFR1. In conclusion, (125)I-YQLS is oxidation-resistant, high affinity radioligand that can be chemically cross-linked to the CRF receptors.     

Novel high-affinity photoactivatable antagonists of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) photoaffinity labeling studies on CRF receptor, type 1 (CRFR1).

Novel photoactivatable antagonists of human/rat corticotropin-releasing factor (h/rCRF) have been synthesized and characterized. The N-terminal amino acid D-phenylalanine in astressin ?cyclo(30-33) [D-Phe12, Nle21,38, Glu30, Lys33]h/rCRF-(12-41)?, a potent CRF peptide antagonist, was replaced by a phenyldiazirine, the 4-(1-azi-2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)benzoyl (ATB) residue. Additionally, His32 of astressin was substituted by either alanine or tyrosine for specific radioactive labeling with 125I at either His13 or Tyr32, respectively. The photoactivatable CRF antagonists were tested for their ability to displace 125I-labeled Tyr0 ovine CRF ([125I-labeled Tyr0]oCRF) in binding experiments and to inhibit oCRF-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293 cells, permanently transfected with cDNA coding for rat CRF receptor, type 1 (rCRFR1) or human Y-79 retinoblastoma cells known to carry endogenous functional human CRFR1 (hCRFR1). ATB-cyclo(30-33)[Nle21,38, Glu30, Ala32, Lys33]h/rCRF-(13-41) (compound 1) was found to bind with higher affinity to rat or human CRFR1 when compared with ATB-cyclo(30-33)[Nle21,38, Glu30, Tyr32, Lys33]h/rCRF-(13-41) (compound 2) and exhibited higher inhibition of oCRF-stimulated cAMP accumulation in HEK 293 cells stably transfected with cDNA coding for rCRFR1 (HEK-rCRFR1 cells) or Y-79 cells. A highly glycosylated, 66-kDa protein was identified with SDS/PAGE, when the radioactively iodinated compounds 1 or 2 were covalently linked to rCRFR1. The specificity of the photoactivatable 125I-labeled CRF antagonists was demonstrated with SDS/PAGE by the finding that these analogs could be displaced from the receptor by their corresponding nonlabeled form, but not other unrelated peptides such as vasoactive intestinal peptide. The observed molecular size of the receptor was in agreement with the size of CRFR1 found in rat pituitary (66 kDa), but was significantly larger than the size of CRFR1 found in rat cerebellum and olfactory bulb (53 kDa).     

Regulation of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor type 2beta mRNA by mitogen-activated protein kinases in aortic smooth muscle cells

The actions of the corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) family of peptides are mediated by the seven transmembrane-domain G-protein-coupled receptors, the CRF receptors. CRF receptor type 2beta (CRFR2beta) messenger RNA (mRNA) is expressed primarily in the cardiovascular system, where its levels are decreased by urocortin 1 (Ucn1), a novel peptide in the CRF family. In a previous study, we reported that CRFR2beta mRNA levels were partially down-regulated via the cAMP-protein kinase A pathway. This study focused on the involvement of the intracellular mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway in the modulation of CRFR2beta mRNA levels. Ribonuclease protection assays showed that decreases in CRFR2beta mRNA levels induced by Ucn1 and cAMP were attenuated by the p38 MAP kinase inhibitor SB202190 or SB203580. This finding suggested that the p38 MAP kinase pathway was involved in this regulation. Anisomycin, a classic p38 kinase activator, increased CRFR2beta mRNA levels in A7r5 cells. This effect of anisomycin was completely reversed by H7, a serine/threonine kinase inhibitor, while both p38 kinase and MAP kinase kinase inhibitors failed to block the increase in CRFR2beta mRNA levels caused by anisomycin. As anisomycin can activate Jun amino terminal kinases, as well as p38 MAP kinase, it is possible that other MAP kinases, such as Jun amino terminal kinases, also contribute to the increase in gene levels. Alternatively, anisomycin may increase CRFR2beta mRNA levels indirectly as a consequence of blocking protein synthesis.     

A Screening Strategy Based on Differential Binding of Ligand to Receptor and to Binding Proteins: Screening for Compounds Interacting with Corticotrophin-Releasing Factor-Binding Protein

The ligand-receptor interaction has been commonly used in development of high throughput screening assays for new drugs. In some cases, an endogenous ligand interacts not only with membrane receptors but also with soluble binding proteins. Corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) is an important stress neurotransmitter/hormone involved in both the central and peripheral nervous systems. CRF exerts its function by interacting with CRFR1 and CRFR2 receptors. In addition, CRF-binding protein (CRF-BP) binds CRF with high affinity. Accordingly, CRF-BP has been suggested to play an important role in modulating CRF function. Based on the potential involvement of CRF-BP in many neurological disorders, it is desirable to develop a screening assay to look for drugs that either mimic or interfere with CRF binding to CRF-BP. An assay was developed to monitor the interactions of radiolabeled CRF with human/rat CRF-BP and the mouse CRFR1 (mCRFR1) receptor. By carefully examining the binding characteristics of radiolabeled CRF to mCRFR1, the assay was able to identify compounds that bind to CRF-BP with high affinity and have little or no affinity for mCRFR1 receptors. Based on a mathematical model, we have verified the screening system with several well-characterized CRF ligands that all have different affinities for CRF receptors and CRF-BP.     

The stress response neuropeptide CRF increases amyloid‐β production by regulating γ‐secretase activity

The biological underpinnings linking stress to Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk are poorly understood. We investigated how corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF), a critical stress response mediator, influences amyloid‐β (Aβ) production. In cells, CRF treatment increases Aβ production and triggers CRF receptor 1 (CRFR1) and γ‐secretase internalization. Co‐immunoprecipitation studies establish that γ‐secretase associates with CRFR1; this is mediated by β‐arrestin binding motifs. Additionally, CRFR1 and γ‐secretase co‐localize in lipid raft fractions, with increased γ‐secretase accumulation upon CRF treatment. CRF treatment also increases γ‐secretase activity in vitro, revealing a second, receptor‐independent mechanism of action. CRF is the first endogenous neuropeptide that can be shown to directly modulate γ‐secretase activity. Unexpectedly, CRFR1 antagonists also increased Aβ. These data collectively link CRF to increased Aβ through γ‐secretase and provide mechanistic insight into how stress may increase AD risk. They also suggest that direct targeting of CRF might be necessary to effectively modulate this pathway for therapeutic benefit in AD, as CRFR1 antagonists increase Aβ and in some cases preferentially increase Aβ42 via complex effects on γ‐secretase.     

CRF receptor type 1 mediates continual hypoxia-induced CRF peptide and CRF mRNA expression increase in hypothalamic PVN of rats

We demonstrated previously that hypoxia activated CRF and CRF mRNA in PVN, and CRF receptor 1 (CRFR1) mRNA in rat pituitary. The aim of the study is to test whether the hypoxia-activated CRF and CRF mRNA is associated with triggering CRFR1. Rats were exposed to hypobaric hypoxia at altitude of 2 and 5 km. CRF and CRF mRNA were assayed by immunostaining and in situ hybridization. CRFR1 mRNA was assayed by RT-PCR. Results showed that 5 km continual hypoxia increased CRF and CRF mRNA in PVN, CRFR1 mRNA in pituitary, and plasma corticosterone. The hypoxia-increased CRF, CRF mRNA, CRFR1 mRNA, and corticosterone were blocked by CRFR1 antagonist (CP-154,526), suggesting that CRFR1 in PVN and pituitary are responsible for the hypoxia-increased CRF and CRF mRNA in PVN.     

Type 1 corticotropin-releasing factor receptors in the ventromedial hypothalamus promote hypoglycemia-induced hormonal counterregulation

Type 2 corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptors (CRFR2) within the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH), a key glucose-sensing region, play a major role in regulating the hormonal counterregulatory responses (CRRs) to acute hypoglycemia. The VMH expresses both subtypes of CRF receptors, CRFR1 and CRFR2. The objective of this study was to examine the role of the CRFR1 receptor in the VMH in the regulation of the CRR to acute hypoglycemia. To compare the hormonal CRR to hypoglycemia, awake and unrestrained Sprague-Dawley rats were bilaterally microinjected to the VMH with either 1) aECF, 2) CRF (1 pmol/side), 3) CRFR1 antagonist Antalarmin (500 pmol/side), or 4) CRF + Antalarmin prior to undergoing a hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemic (2.8 mM) clamp. A second series of studies also incorporated an infusion of [(3)H]glucose to allow the calculation of glucose dynamics. In addition the effect of CRFR1 antagonism in the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) was studied. Activation of VMH CRFR1 increased, whereas inhibition of CRFR1 suppressed hypoglycemia-induced CRRs. Inhibition of VMH CRFR1 also increased peripheral glucose utilization and reduced endogenous glucose production during hypoglycemia, whereas VMH CRF reduced peripheral glucose utilization. In contrast CRFR1 inhibition in the PVN blunted corticosterone but not epinephrine or glucagon CRR to hypoglycemia. In contrast to CRFR2 activation, CRFR1 activation within the VMH amplifies CRRs to acute hypoglycemia. The balance between these two opposing CRFRs in this key glucose-sensing region may play an important role in determining the magnitude of CRRs to acute hypoglycemia.     

Activation of corticotropin releasing factor receptor type 2 in the heart by corticotropin releasing factor offers cytoprotection against ischemic injury via PKA and PKC dependent signaling

Corticotrophin-releasing factor receptor 2β (CRFR2β) is expressed in the myocardium. In the present study we explore whether acute treatment with the neuropeptide corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) could induce cytoprotection against a lethal ischemic insult in the heart (isolated murine neonatal cardiac myocytes and the isolated Langendorff perfused rat heart) by activating CRFR2. In vitro, CRF offered cytoprotection when added prior to lethal simulated ischemic stress by reducing apoptotic and necrotic cell death. Ex vivo, CRF significantly reduced infarct size from 52.1±3.1% in control hearts to 35.3±3.1% (P<0.001) when administered prior to a lethal ischemic insult. The CRF peptide did not confer cytoprotection when administered at the point of hypoxic reoxygenation or ischemic reperfusion. The acute effects of CRF treatment are mediated by CRF receptor type 2 (CRFR2) since the cardioprotection ex vivo was inhibited by the CRFR2 antagonist astressin-2B. Inhibition of the mitogen activated protein kinase-ERK1/2 by PD98059 failed to inhibit the effect of CRF. However, both protein kinase A and protein kinase C inhibitors abrogated CRF-mediated protection both ex vivo and in vitro. These data suggest that the CRF peptide reduces both apoptotic and necrotic cell death in cardiac myocytes subjected to lethal ischemic induced stress through activation of PKA and PKC dependent signaling pathways downstream of CRFR2.     

Mutational analysis of two putative catalytic motifs of the type IV restriction endonuclease Eco57I

The role of two sequence motifs (SM) as putative cleavage catalytic centers (77)PDX(13)EAK (SM I) and (811)PDX(20)DQK (SM II) of type IV restriction endonuclease Eco57I was studied by site-directed mutational analysis. Substitutions within SM I; D78N, D78A, D78K, and E92Q reduced cleavage activity of Eco57I to a level undetectable both in vivo and in vitro. Residual endonucleolytic activity of the E92Q mutant was detected only when the Mg(2+) in the standard reaction mixture was replaced with Mn(2+). The mutants D78N and E92Q retained the ability to interact with DNA specifically. The mutants also retained DNA methylation activity of Eco57I. The properties of the SM I mutants indicate that Asp(78) and Glu(92) residues are essential for cleavage activity of the Eco57I, suggesting that the sequence motif (77)PDX(13)EAK represents the cleavage active site of this endonuclease. Eco57I mutants containing single amino acid substitutions within SM II (D812A, D833N, D833A) revealed only a small or moderate decrease of cleavage activity as compared with wild-type Eco57I, indicating that the SM II motif does not represent the catalytic center of Eco57I. The results, taken together, allow us to conclude that the Eco57I restriction endonuclease has one catalytic center for cleavage of DNA.     

N-glycans of F protein differentially affect fusion activity of human respiratory syncytial virus

The human respiratory syncytial virus (Long strain) fusion protein contains six potential N-glycosylation sites: N27, N70, N116, N120, N126, and N500. Site-directed mutagenesis of these positions revealed that the mature fusion protein contains three N-linked oligosaccharides, attached to N27, N70, and N500. By introducing these mutations into the F gene in different combinations, four more mutants were generated. All mutants, including a triple mutant devoid of any N-linked oligosaccharide, were efficiently transported to the plasma membrane, as determined by flow cytometry and cell surface biotinylation. None of the glycosylation mutations interfered with proteolytic activation of the fusion protein. Despite similar levels of cell surface expression, the glycosylation mutants affected fusion activity in different ways. While the N27Q mutation did not have an effect on syncytium formation, loss of the N70-glycan caused a fusion activity increase of 40%. Elimination of both N-glycans (N27/70Q mutant) reduced the fusion activity by about 50%. A more pronounced reduction of the fusion activity of about 90% was observed with the mutants N500Q, N27/500Q, and N70/500Q. Almost no fusion activity was detected with the triple mutant N27/70/500Q. These data indicate that N-glycosylation of the F2 subunit at N27 and N70 is of minor importance for the fusion activity of the F protein. The single N-glycan of the F1 subunit attached to N500, however, is required for efficient syncytium formation.     

The G82S polymorphism promotes glycosylation of the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) at asparagine 81: comparison of wild-type rage with the G82S polymorphic variant

Interaction between the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and its ligands amplifies the proinflammatory response. N-Linked glycosylation of RAGE plays an important role in the regulation of ligand binding. Two potential sites for N-linked glycosylation, at Asn(25) and Asn(81), are implicated, one of which is potentially influenced by a naturally occurring polymorphism that substitutes Gly(82) with Ser. This G82S polymorphic RAGE variant displays increased ligand binding and downstream signaling. We hypothesized that the G82S polymorphism affects RAGE glycosylation and thereby affects ligand binding. WT or various mutant forms of RAGE protein, including N25Q, N81Q, N25Q/G82S, and N25Q/N81Q, were produced by transfecting HEK293 cells. The glycosylation patterns of expressed proteins were compared. Enzymatic deglycosylation showed that WT RAGE and the G82S polymorphic variant are glycosylated to the same extent. Our data also revealed N-linked glycosylation of N25Q and N81Q mutants, suggesting that both Asn(25) and Asn(81) can be utilized for N-linked glycosylation. Using mass spectrometry analysis, we found that Asn(81) may or may not be glycosylated in WT RAGE, whereas in G82S RAGE, Asn(81) is always glycosylated. Furthermore, RAGE binding to S100B ligand is affected by Asn(81) glycosylation, with consequences for NF-κB activation. Therefore, the G82S polymorphism promotes N-linked glycosylation of Asn(81), which has implications for the structure of the ligand binding region of RAGE and might explain the enhanced function associated with the G82S polymorphic RAGE variant.     

Corticotropin-releasing factor family and its receptors: tumor therapeutic targets?

Urocortin (UCN) and corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) are members of CRF family. Though CRF is mainly distributed in central nervous system (CNS), UCN has been reported to play biologically diverse roles in several systems such as cardiovascular, respiratory, digestive, reproductive, stress, immunologic system, etc. UCN and CRF bind to two known receptors, CRFR1 and CRFR2, to function. Both CRF receptors are distributed in CNS and periphery tissues, and their expression in cancer tissues has been reported. Now there are many documents indicating UCN/CRF play an important role in the regulation of carcinogenesis. There is also evidence indicating UCN/CRF have anticancer effects via CRFRs. This paper will review the effects of CRF family in cancers.