Sister Chromatid Cohesion

During S phase, not only does DNA have to be replicated, but also newly synthesized DNA molecules have to be connected with each other. This sister chromatid cohesion is essential for the biorientation of chromosomes on the mitotic or meiotic spindle, and is thus an essential prerequisite for chromosome segregation. Cohesion is mediated by cohesin complexes that are thought to embrace sister chromatids as large rings. Cohesin binds to DNA dynamically before DNA replication and is converted into a stably DNA-bound form during replication. This conversion requires acetylation of cohesin, which in vertebrates leads to recruitment of sororin. Sororin antagonizes Wapl, a protein that is able to release cohesin from DNA, presumably by opening the cohesin ring. Inhibition of Wapl by sororin therefore “locks” cohesin rings on DNA and allows them to maintain cohesion for long periods of time in mammalian oocytes, possibly for months or even years.DNA replication during the synthesis (S) phase generates identical DNA molecules, which, in their chromatinized form, are called sister chromatids. The pairs of sister chromatids remain united as part of one chromosome during the subsequent gap (G₂) phase and during early mitosis, in prophase, prometaphase, and metaphase. During these stages of mitosis chromosomes condense, in most eukaryotes the nuclear envelope breaks down, and in all species chromosomes are ultimately attached to both poles of the mitotic spindle. Only once this biorientation has been achieved for all chromosomes, the sister chromatids are separated from each other in anaphase and transported toward opposite spindle poles of the mother cell, enabling its subsequent division into two genetically identical daughter cells.This series of events critically depends on the fact that sister chromatids remain physically connected with each other from S phase until metaphase. This physical connection, called sister chromatid cohesion, opposes the pulling forces that are generated by microtubules that attach to kinetochores and thereby enables the biorientation of chromosomes on the mitotic spindle (Tanaka et al. 2000b). Without cohesion, sister chromatids could therefore not be segregated symmetrically between the forming daughter cells, resulting in aneuploidy. For the same reasons, cohesion is essential for chromosome segregation in meiosis I and meiosis II. Cohesion defects in human oocytes can lead to aneuploidy, which is thought to be the major cause of spontaneous abortion, because only a few types of aneuploidy are compatible with viability, such as trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), trisomy 18 (Edwards syndrome), and trisomy 13 (Patau syndrome) (Hunt and Hassold 2010). Studying the mechanisms of cohesion is therefore essential for understanding how the genome is passed properly from one cell generation to the next.In addition, sister chromatid cohesion facilitates the repair of DNA double-strand breaks in cells that have replicated their DNA, where such breaks can be repaired by a homologous recombination mechanism that uses the undamaged sister chromatid as a template (for review, see Watrin et al. 2006). Furthermore, mutations in the proteins that are required for sister chromatid cohesion can cause defects in chromatin structure and gene regulation, and can in rare cases lead to congenital developmental disorders, called Cornelia de Lange syndrome, Roberts/SC Phocomelia syndrome, and Warsaw Breakage syndrome (for review, see Mannini et al. 2010).     

Chromatid lesions and chromatid core morphology

A silver-staining technique revealed the core morphology of metaphase chromosomes of irradiated CHO cells with chromatid lesions (breaks, gaps). These cells were photographed before and after silver staining. As a rule, the core was not continuous in chromatid gaps, suggesting that the chromatid is broken in many so-called gaps. Ten cytogeneticists who were asked to classify chromatid gaps and breaks from photographs of chromosome lesions before silver core staining agreed in only 19 of 53 cases.     

Statistical Analysis of Chromatid Interference

The nonrandom occurrence of crossovers along a single strand during meiosis can be caused by either chromatid interference, crossover interference or both. Although crossover interference has been consistently observed in almost all organisms since the time of the first linkage studies, chromatid interference has not been as thoroughly discussed in the literature, and the evidence provided for it is inconsistent. In this paper with virtually no restrictions on the nature of crossover interference, we describe the constraints that follow from the assumption of no chromatid interference for single spore data. These constraints are necessary consequences of the assumption of no chromatid interference, but their satisfaction is not sufficient to guarantee no chromatid interference. Models can be constructed in which chromatid interference clearly exists but is not detectable with single spore data. We then extend our analysis to cover tetrad data, which permits more powerful tests of no chromatid interference. We note that the traditional test of no chromatid interference based on tetrad data does not make full use of the information provided by the data, and we offer a statistical procedure for testing the no chromatid interference constraints that does make full use of the data. The procedure is then applied to data from several organisms. Although no strong evidence of chromatid interference is found, we do observe an excess of two-strand double recombinations, i.e., negative chromatid interference.     

Chromatid associations in acrocentric chromosomes: evidence against nonrandomness.

Acrocentric chromosome associations from peripheral blood cultures of four normal individuals were examined after two replication cycles in bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) using the FPG technique. Altogether, 167 out of 328 associations, or 51%, were concordant, having opposed chromatids similarly stained, and 49% discordant, thus indicating a random association of chromatids. None of the individual cultures revealed any significant departure from random chromatid association. Variation among individuals ranged from 38% to 58% concordance but repeat cultures did not indicate any consistent direction to the departure from 50%. Furthermore, neither the concentration of BrdU nor the type of association scored had any significant effect on the randomness of chromatid association. Thus, in contrast to another recent report, we found no evidence for a nonrandom alignment of chromatids in associated acrocentric chromosomes.     

Chromatid recommensuration after segmental duplication

Background  

Midsegment duplication (dup) of chromatid arms may be symmetric or asymmetric. It can be argued that every dup should yield a discommensured RC with (a) loss of at least one duplicated unit to the template counterpart and; (b) deletion of all sections of the replicating chromatid arm that are distal to both the gap left by the duplicating process and the segment closest to the centromere.     

Sister Chromatid Cohesion Remodeling and Meiotic Recombination

Proper control of cohesion along the chromosome arms is essential for segregation of homologous chromosomes in meiosis. In a recent study we reported that Tid1p, a protein previously implicated in recombination, is required for resolution of Mcd1p-dependent cohesion in meiosis. Here we demonstrate that Pds5p and Dmc1p promote this cohesion. Pds5p is known to be required for maintenance of cohesion while Dmc1p is recognized as essential for meiotic recombination. Finding that the same defect in separation of sister chromatids could be suppressed by disrupting the functions of these proteins supports the emerging recognition that cohesion is remodeled during recombination and further indicates that cohesion is modified specifically to regulate meiotic recombination. We also find that overexpression of the regulatory subunit of Cdc7p kinase, Dbf4p, suppresses the tid1Δ sporulation defect, suggesting a role for Cdc7p/Dbf4p in regulating cohesion.     

Sister Chromatid Exchanges in Tradescantia Paludosa

A modified fluorescence-plus-Giemsa technique is described that allows differential staining of sister chromatids in root tip cells from cuttings of Tradescantia patudesa. With this staining technique, chromatids with both DNA strands unsubstituted are differentiated from chromatids containing 5-bromouracil in place of thymine in one of the strands of the DNA duplex. The baseline level of sister chromatid exchanges was shown to be dependent on the concentration of 5-bromodeoxyuridine in the treatment solution, the mean frequency being 43.5 sister chromatid exchanges per cell for the experimental protocol suggested.     

Effect of Free Radicals and Temperature on Sister Chromatid Exchanges in Hordeum vulgare L.

The clastogenic (chromosome-damaging) effect of many chemical and physical agents is believed to be mediated by reactive oxygen-detived radicals. The interaction of these free radicals with DNA and the significance of the radical-induced DNA lesions in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis have been the subjects of increasing interest during recent years. Sister chromatid exchange (SCE) reflects an interchange between DNA molecules at homologous loci within a replicating chromosome. SCE analysis was found to have increased use for monitoring the exposure of cell to mutagenic carcinogens. The authors found that the induction of SCEs in cells of Hordeum vulgare L. by ascorbic acid, mitomycin C, adriamycin and maleic hydrazid was through the action of free radicals. They also studied the influence of growth temperature on average generation time(AGT) and SCEs. and disclosed a close correlation between AGT and SCEs. The Brdu-Giemsa techniques were used for the detection of SCEs and AGT in cytological preparations of metaphase chromosomes.     

Pericentromeric Sister Chromatid Cohesion Promotes Kinetochore Biorientation

Accurate chromosome segregation depends on sister kinetochores making bioriented attachments to microtubules from opposite poles. An essential regulator of biorientation is the Ipl1/Aurora B protein kinase that destabilizes improper microtubule–kinetochore attachments. To identify additional biorientation pathways, we performed a systematic genetic analysis between the ipl1-321 allele and all nonessential budding yeast genes. One of the mutants, mcm21Δ, precociously separates pericentromeres and this is associated with a defect in the binding of the Scc2 cohesin-loading factor at the centromere. Strikingly, Mcm21 becomes essential for biorientation when Ipl1 function is reduced, and this appears to be related to its role in pericentromeric cohesion. When pericentromeres are artificially tethered, Mcm21 is no longer needed for biorientation despite decreased Ipl1 activity. Taken together, these data reveal a specific role for pericentromeric linkage in ensuring kinetochore biorientation.     

小麦愈伤组织细胞的姐妹染色单体交换

用BrdU标记,改良的FPG法染色,建立了一种植物愈伤组织细胞姐妹染色单体分染的方法。并对培养基的不同附加成分对SCE的影响进行了研究。所有培养基上愈伤组织细胞的SCE率都显著高于正常根尖分生组织细胞。6-BA,AgNO_3,高浓度的2,4-D,蔗糖均可诱发SCE。     

Sororin,the Cell Cycle and Sister Chromatid Cohesion

Sister chromatid cohesion is essential for the maintenance of genome integrity. Errors in regulation of cohesion result in increased sensitivity to DNA damage, mis-segregation of chromosomes, and loss of genetic information. We recently showed that sororin is an essential regulator of sister chromatid cohesion in vertebrates. Interestingly, we identified sororin in a screen for proteins whose levels are controlled by the Anaphase Promoting Complex (APC), a cell cycle –regulated ubiquitin ligase. Ubiquitination by the APC and the resulting degradation ensure that sororin levels are low throughout G1 and only rise during S phase. We speculate that this regulation is an essential part of the mechanism that ensures that cohesion is established only after there are in fact two sister chromatids to tie together. Cohesion thus established can then be used both to mediate recombinational DNA repair, as well as to ensure accurate sister chromatid segregation in anaphase. Both of these roles are essential to genome stability.