Differential effect of aphidicolin on adenovirus DNA synthesis and cellular DNA synthesis.

There is strong evidence for a participation of DNA polymerase gamma in the replication of adenovirus (Ad) DNA. To study a possible additional role of DNA polymerase alpha we measured the effect of aphidicolin on viral DNA replication. In intact cells, aphidicolin inhibits Ad DNA synthesis weakly. The drug concentration required for 50% inhibition of Ad DNA replication was 300-400 fold higher than for a similar effect on cellular DNA synthesis. Such a differential inhibition was also observed in AGMK cells doubly infected with SV40 and the simian adenovirus SA7. No evidence was found for modification of aphidicolin in infected cells or for a change in aphidicolin sensitivity of DNA polymerase alpha after infection. The extent of inhibition of purified DNA polymerase alpha was dependent upon the dCTP concentration. The same situation was observed when DNA synthesis was studied in isolated nuclei from uninfected cells. However, in nuclei from Ad infected cells no effect of dCTP on aphidicolin sensitivity was found. These results were taken as evidence that DNA polymerase alpha does not participate in the replication of adenovirus DNA.     

Inhibition of host DNA synthesis by adenovirus infection is reversed at elevated temperatures.

Infection of KB cells by adenovirus normally results in a drastic reduction of host DNA synthesis at 33 to 37 degrees C. This inhibition was largely reversed by raising the temperature to 41 degrees C. Inhibition was reinstated if the temperature is lowered.     

Alterations in nuclear matrix structure after adenovirus infection.

Infection of HeLa cells with adenovirus serotype 2 causes rearrangements in nuclear matrix morphology which can best be seen by gentle cell extraction and embedment-free section electron microscopy. We used these techniques to examine the nuclear matrices and cytoskeletons of cells at 6, 13, 28, and 44 h after infection. As infection progressed, chromatin condensed onto the nucleoli and the nuclear lamina. Virus-related inclusions appeared in the nucleus, where they partitioned with the nuclear matrix. These virus centers consisted of at least three distinguishable areas: amorphously dense regions, granular regions whose granulations appeared to be viral capsids, and filaments connecting these regions to each other and to the nuclear lamina. The filaments became decorated with viral capsids of two different densities, which may be empty capsid shells and capsids with DNA-protein cores. The interaction of some capsids with the filaments persisted even after lysis of the cell. We propose that granulated virus-related structures are sites of capsid assembly and storage and that the filaments may be involved in the transport of capsids and capsid intermediates. The nuclear lamina became increasingly crenated after infection, with some extensions appearing to bud off and form blebs of nuclear material in the cytoplasm. The perinuclear cytoskeleton became rearranged after infection, forming a corona of decreased filament number around the nucleus. In summary, we propose that adenovirus rearranges the nuclear matrix and cytoskeleton to support its own replication.     

Serotype-specific inactivation of the cellular DNA damage response during adenovirus infection

Adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) inactivates the host cell DNA damage response by facilitating the degradation of Mre11, DNA ligase IV, and p53. In the case of p53, this is achieved through polyubiquitylation by Ad5E1B55K and Ad5E4orf6, which recruit a Cul5-based E3 ubiquitin ligase. Recent evidence indicates that this paradigm does not apply to other adenovirus serotypes, since Ad12, but not Ad5, causes the degradation of TOPBP1 through the action of E4orf6 alone and a Cul2-based E3 ubiquitin ligase. We now have extended these studies to adenovirus groups A to E. While infection by Ad4, Ad5, and Ad12 (groups E, C, and A, respectively) cause the degradation of Mre11, DNA ligase IV, and p53, infection with Ad3, Ad7, Ad9, and Ad11 (groups B1, B1, D, and B2, respectively) only affects DNA ligase IV levels. Indeed, Ad3, Ad7, and Ad11 cause the marked accumulation of p53. Despite this, MDM2 levels were very low following infection with all of the viruses examined here, regardless of whether they increase p53 expression. In addition, we found that only Ad12 causes the degradation of TOPBP1, and, like Ad5, Ad4 recruits a Cul5-based E3 ubiquitin ligase to degrade p53. Surprisingly, Mre11 and DNA ligase IV degradation do not appear to be significantly affected in Ad4-, Ad5-, or Ad12-infected cells depleted of Cul2 or Cul5, indicating that E1B55K and E4orf6 recruit multiple ubiquitin ligases to target cellular proteins. Finally, although Mre11 is not degraded by Ad3, Ad7, Ad9, and Ad11, no viral DNA concatemers could be detected. We suggest that group B and D adenoviruses have evolved mechanisms based on the loss of DNA ligase IV and perhaps other unknown molecules to disable the host cell DNA damage response to promote viral replication.     

Failure of accumulation of cellular RNA in hamster cells stimulated to synthesize DNA by infection with adenovirus 2

AF8 cells are temperature-sensitive mutants of the cell cycle derived from baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells which arrest in the G1 phase when incubated at the nonpermissive temperature. RNA accumulation was studied in these cells by flow cytofluorimetry following serum stimulation or adenovirus 2 infection. Serum stimulation caused an increase in the amount of RNA per cell, which reached a maximum in S and G2 cells, as repeatedly reported in the literature. However, adenovirus 2 infection caused a fraction of cells to enter S phase without any concomitant increase in the amount of RNA per cell.     

Mechanism of induction of cellular DNA synthesis by the adenovirus E1A 12S cDNA product

The mechanism of induction of DNA synthesis in quiescent rat 3Y1 cells by the adenovirus E1A gene was investigated using the 3Y1 derivative cell lines g12-21, gn12RB1, and gn12RB2. The g12-21 cells express the E1A 12S cDNA and the latter two cells express both the E1A 12S cDNA and the human retinoblastoma susceptibility (Rb) gene at different levels in response to dexamethasone (dex). The cDNA sequences of E1A-inducible cell cycle-dependent genes, clone 3 and clone 16, were isolated by differential screening of a cDNA library constructed from dex-treated g12-21 cells. The quiescent 3Y1 cells induced c-fos and c-myc expression within 2 h after serum stimulation and expressed clone 16 and clone 3 transiently at around 8 h before the onset of DNA synthesis (10 h). In contrast, the quiescent g12-21 cells treated with dex expressed a high level of E1A at 6 to 8 h after treatment and expressed clone 16 and clone 3 at around 8 h without stimulation of c-fos and c-myc expression, suggesting that E1A bypasses the cell cycle early in G1. The half-maximal rate of DNA synthesis was reached in a much shorter time in dex-treated g12-21 cells (12 h) than in serum-treated 3Y1 cells (18 h), suggesting that E1A also bypasses the cell cycle at the G1/S boundary. The gn12RB1 and gn12RB2 cells were unable to induce DNA synthesis in response to dex presumably due to lower levels of E1A expression, although gn12RB2 but not gn12RB1 cells could express clone 16 and clone 3. These results suggest that the level of E1A required for bypass at the G1/S boundary is higher than that required early in G1.     

DNA synthesis in polyoma virus infection. II. Relationship between viral DNA replication and initiation of cellular DNA replicons

The rate of synthesis of cellular DNA is stimulated in stationary phase mouse embryo cells infected with polyoma virus. Nascent cellular DNA strands pulselabeled with [³H]thymidine in the presence of replicating viral DNA are smaller, by an average of 2·1 × 10⁷ daltons, than DNA made under similar conditions in uninfected cells. Previous work (Cheevers et al., 1972) has indicated that this observation is the consequence of activation in infected cells of cellular DNA initiation sites not in operation during a similar pulse-labeling interval in uninfected cells. Similar results were obtained using cells infected with the temperature-sensitive Ts-a mutant of polyoma at 32 °C, which permits both the induction of cellular DNA synthesis and replication of viral DNA. However, at a temperature of 39 °C, which permits only the induction of cellular DNA replication in Ts-a-infected cells, the size of newly synthesized DNA is not different from that of uninfected cells. Similarly, in rat embryo cells abortively infected with polyoma (wild-type), stimulation of cellular DNA synthesis occurs but viral DNA replication is restricted, and no difference is apparent in the size of newly formed DNA as compared to uninfected cells. These results are interpreted to mean that in productively infected cells, polyoma DNA and some regions of the host genome may be co-ordinately replicated.     

The effect of aphidicolin on adenovirus DNA synthesis.

Aphidicolin inhibits adenovirus DNA replication in HeLa cells and in a cell-free, infected, nuclear extract in which viral DNA is elongated. The compound inhibits alpha DNA polymerase, extensively purified from HeLa cells, but has little or no effect on the beta or gamma DNA polymerases similarly purified. Aphidicolin does not affect thymidine uptake by cells nor does synthesis as it also inhibits DNA replication in uninfected cells. The inhibition by aphidicolin is reversible if the drug is removed within 18 hrs after addition to HeLa or Chinese Hamster Ovary cells but the cells are irreversibly affected if the drug remains for 48 hours.     

The adenovirus E1A protein overrides the requirement for cellular ras in initiating DNA synthesis.

The adenovirus E1A protein can induce cellular DNA synthesis in growth-arrested cells by interacting with the cellular protein p300 or pRb. In addition, serum- and growth factor-dependent cells require ras activity to initiate DNA synthesis and recently we have shown that Balb/c 3T3 cells can be blocked in either early or late G1 following microinjection of an anti-ras antibody. In this study, the E1A 243 amino acid protein is shown through microinjection not only to shorten the G0 to S phase interval but, what is more important, to override the inhibitory effects exerted by the anti-ras antibody in either early or late G1. Specifically, whether E1A is co-injected with anti-ras into quiescent cells or injected 18 h following a separate injection of anti-ras after serum stimulation, it efficiently induces cellular DNA synthesis in cells that would otherwise be blocked in G0/G1. Moreover, injection of a mutant form of E1A that can no longer associate with p300 is just as efficient as wild-type E1A in stimulating DNA synthesis in cells whose ras activity has been neutralized by anti-ras. The results presented here show that E1A is capable of overriding the requirement of cellular ras activity in promoting the entry of cells into S phase. Moreover, the results suggest the possibility that pRb and/or pRb-related proteins may function in a ras-dependent pathway that enables E1A to achieve this activity.     

Identification of adenovirus 2 early genes required for induction of cellular DNA synthesis in resting hamster cells.

tsAF8 cells are temperature-sensitive (ts) mutants of BHK-21 cells that arrest at the nonpermissive temperature in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. When made quiescent by serum restriction, they can be stimulated to enter the S phase by 10% serum at 34 degrees C, but not at 40.6 degrees C. Infection by adenovirus type 2 or type 5 stimulates cellular DNA synthesis in tsAF8 cells at both 34 and 40.6 degrees C. Infection of these cells with deletion Ad5dl312, Ad5dl313, Ad2 delta p305, and Ad2+D1) and temperature-sensitive (H5ts125, H5ts36) mutants of adenovirus indicates that the expression of both early regions 1A and 2 is needed to induce quiescent tsAF8 cells to enter the S phase at the permissive temperature. This finding has been confirmed by microinjection of selected adenovirus DNA fragments into the nucleus of tsAF8 cells. In addition, we have shown that additional viral functions encoded by early regions 1B and 5 are required for the induction of cellular DNA synthesis at the nonpermissive temperature.     

In vitro termination of adenovirus DNA synthesis by a soluble replication complex.

The double-stranded DNA from a soluble DNA replication complex that was labeled with deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates and completed in vitro was digested with EcoRI, Sma I, and Hpa I restriction endonucleases. All regions of the adenovirus type 2 genome were labeled in vitro, but restriction fragments derived from the ends of the DNA molecules were relatively more highly labeled than those derived from internal regions. The in vitro endogenous DNA polymerase reaction also exhibited strand-specific labeling near the molecular ends, in that restriciton fragments from the left end were labeled predominantly in the r strand and fragments from the right end were labeled predominantly in the l strand.     

Stimulation of cellular DNA synthesis by human cytomegalovirus

Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is able to induce cellular DNA synthesis in both permissive (human embryonic lung) and nonpermissive (Vero) cells. The induction of cell DNA synthesis was assayed by the incorporation of [methyl-³H]thymidine into macromolecules having the buoyant density characteristics of cell DNA. The DNA synthesis induced by CMV infection appears to represent normal semiconservative replication as opposed to repair synthesis. Both strains of CMV tested were capable of inducing cell DNA synthesis. Virus exposed to heat or UV light prior to infection lost the ability to induce DNA synthesis, indicating that a virus-coded function expressed after infection is responsible for stimulation of cell DNA synthesis.     

Effects of novobiocin on adenovirus DNA synthesis and encapsidation.

Novobiocin, an inhibitor of DNA gyrase implicated in bacterial and likely mammalian, chromosome replication, inhibited the initiation, but not the elongation of human adenovirus DNA replicative synthesis. The inhibition was partially reversible, even in the presence of protein synthesis inhibitor. Novobiocin inhibited also the encapsidation of viral DNA, and this effect was independent of the block in DNA replication. It was suggested that novobiocin acted on two different functions, one involved in viral DNA replication initiation, the other in DNA encapsidation.     

Chromatin structure of adenovirus DNA throughout infection

For more than half a century, researchers have studied the basic biology of Adenovirus (Ad), unraveling the subtle, yet profound, interactions between the virus and the host. These studies have uncovered previously unknown proteins and pathways crucial for normal cell function that the virus manipulates to achieve optimal virus replication and gene expression. In the infecting virion, the viral DNA is tightly condensed in a virally encoded protamine-like protein which must be remodeled within the first few hours of infection to allow for efficient expression of virus-encoded genes and subsequent viral DNA replication. This review discusses our current knowledge of Ad DNA-protein complex within the infected cell nucleus, the cellular proteins the virus utilizes to achieve chromatinization, and how this event contributes to efficient gene expression and progression of the virus life cycle.     

Control of cellular gene expression during adenovirus infection: induction and shut-off of dihydrofolate reductase gene expression by adenovirus type 2.

Infection of human cells by adenovirus results in multiple alterations of host gene expression. To examine the effects of viral infection on the expression of a single gene, a line of human cells was developed which is resistant to growth in methotrexate and which contains amplified RNA and protein specific for dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). Cytogenetic evidence indicated the presence of amplified DNA. Adenovirus infection of these cells caused an induction and subsequent decline in the synthesis of DHFR protein. The maximum DHFR induction occurred 16 to 19 h after infection and reached a level 2.5-fold greater than that observed in uninfected cells. Induction of DHFR protein synthesis was accompanied by concomitant increases in the level of steady-state DHFR-specific cytoplasmic RNA. The relative rate of DHFR mRNA production (i.e., the appearance of DHFR-specific mRNA sequences in the cytoplasm) also increased 2.5-fold during induction. Later in infection, the relative rate of DHFR protein synthesis declined, reaching a level below that observed in uninfected cells. This decline was accompanied by a similar decline in the steady-state levels of DHFR RNA and in the relative rate of synthesis of DHFR mRNA. These data suggest that adenovirus infection controls DHFR gene expression by increasing and subsequently decreasing the relative rate at which DHFR-specific mRNA sequences appear in the cytoplasm and enter the pool of mRNA available for translation.     

Histone synthesis is not coupled to the replication of adenovirus DNA

Histone synthesis decreases approximately in parallel with the decrease in cellular DNA synthesis when KB cell monolayers are productively infected with adenovirus type 2 and does not occur in coordination with the later surge of viral DNA synthesis. The synthesis of histones is not, therefore, required for all replicative DNA synthesis in the nuclei of mammalian cells.     

Alterations in antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity during the course of HIV-1 infection. Humoral and cellular defects

HIV-1-specific cell-mediated cytotoxicity (CMC) is a form of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) in which HIV-1-specific antibodies arm NK cells directly to become cytotoxic for targets bearing HIV-1 antigenic determinants. This non-MHC-restricted cytotoxic activity is present in early stages of disease and declines markedly with disease progression. To understand the cellular and humoral factors contributing to the reduction in this activity, the conditions under which maximal arming of cells occurs was examined in vitro. With the use of a large patient cohort, a strong positive correlation was found between the capacity of a serum to direct lysis in standard ADCC assays and its ability to arm NK cells. Patients with minimal HIV-1-specific ADCC-directing antibodies exhibited low levels of CMC and were unable to arm normal effector cells in vitro. The lack of sufficient ADCC-directing antibodies was found to be one cause of defective CMC in some patients. Unlike asymptomatics, only a weak positive correlation was found between arming and ADCC with sera from AIDS patients, indicating that a factor other than absolute HIV-1 specific antibody titer was responsible for decreased CMC in this patient population. Another group of patients was found to have diminished CMC despite the presence of antibodies in the serum that were fully capable of arming normal effector cells to become cytotoxic for gp120-expressing targets. When compared with those of normal individuals, lymphocytes from seropositive patients mediated significantly reduced levels of cytotoxicity in ADCC and arming assays with the use of a high titered HIV-1-specific serum. In both assay systems, the magnitude and frequency of dysfunction in antibody-dependent cytolysis was found to be greater among AIDS patients than among asymptomatic individuals. The demonstration of both cellular and humoral defects in the ability of seropositive individuals to manifest ADCC reactivities strongly suggests that HIV-1 infection may significantly compromise the effectiveness of this potentially important cytolytic reactivity in vivo.