An updated meta-analysis of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene: Three well-characterized polymorphisms with ischemic stroke

Polymorphisms in the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene may influence the risk of ischemic stroke (IS), but the results are still debatable. A meta-analysis was performed to investigate the association between the eNOS gene polymorphisms in IS risk. Case–control studies on the association between the G894T, T-786C, and 4b/a polymorphisms and IS were searched up to July 2012, and the genotype frequencies in the control group were found to be consistent with the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). The effect summary odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained. Meta-regression was used to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity. Funnel plots and Egger's test was used to estimate small study biases, and heterogeneity was assessed by chi-square-based Q-test and I² test. There were total 6537/6475 cases/controls for G894T, 3459/3951 cases/controls for 4b/a, and 2125/2673 cases/controls for T-786C polymorphism. For G894T and 4b/a, a significant association of 894 T allele and 4a allele with increased risk of IS was found in Asians (TT + GT vs. GG: p < 0.00001, OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.38–1.79, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.11; aa + ba vs. bb: P < 0.00001, OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.30–1.97, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.02), but not in Caucasians (TT + GT vs. GG: P = 0.60, OR = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.75–1.19, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.002; aa + ba vs. bb: P = 0.13, OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.62–1.06, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.63). For T-786C polymorphism, there were no significant differences in genotype distribution between IS and control in Asians (CC + TC vs. TT: P = 0.15, OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.95–1.37, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.94) and in Caucasians (CC + TC vs. TT: P = 0.72, OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.75–1.22, P_{heterogeneity} = 0.53). This analysis provides strong evidence that the eNOS T-786C gene polymorphism is not associated with IS, the G894T and 4b/a polymorphisms might be associated with IS, at least in Asians.     

Variants in endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene in idiopathic infertile Brazilian men

Purpose

In recent years, considerable concern has been expressed about the deleterious effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS) on sperm function, because ROS at high levels is potentially detrimental to sperm function and quality. Nitric oxide (NO) is a powerful anti-oxidant present in seminal plasma. The aim of the study was to analyze the distribution of the of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene (T-786C, G894T, e 4a/b) polymorphisms in idiopathic infertile Brazilian men and evaluate the possible role of these polymorphisms in sperm count.

Methods

A case–control study was performed comprising 208 infertile men [n = 74 with non-obstructive azoospermia and n = 134 with severe oligozoospermia] and 201 fertile men as controls. Genotyping of eNOS polymorphisms was performed by real time (T-786C and G894T) and conventional PCR (4a/b). The results were analyzed statistically and a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

According to the sperm count, relatively similar eNOS polymorphism genotypes and allele frequencies were found among the groups. Combined genotypes of the eNOS polymorphisms did not identify a haplotype associated with idiopathic infertility, even when the patients were separated in non-obstructive azoospermia or severe oligozoospermia.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the findings demonstrate that, in Brazilian population studied, genetic variations, T-786C, G894T, and e 4a/b, of the eNOS gene are not associated with male infertility.     

Association between the − 786T>C 1polymorphism in the promoter region of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and risk of coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

A variety of studies have evaluated the association between the − 786T>C polymorphism in the promoter region of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the results remain conflicting. To better understand the role of eNOS − 786T>C polymorphism in CAD risk, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Case–control, cohort or cross-sectional studies evaluating the association between eNOS − 786T>C polymorphism and CAD risk were searched in electronic databases of PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Medline, Embase and Google Scholar Search (up to January 2013). Overall and subgroup analyses were performed. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the association between eNOS − 786T>C polymorphism and CAD risk. Statistical analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.0 and STATA12.0.

Results

Twenty-four studies were analyzed between 6192 CAD cases and 9281 healthy controls. The combined results of overall analysis showed significant positive associations between CAD risk and eNOS − 786T>C polymorphism in dominant model (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.27–1.65), recessive model (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.20–1.56), homozygote comparison (OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.31–2.04), heterozygote comparison (TC vs. TT, OR = 1.39, 95% CI = 1.23–1.57; CC vs. TC, OR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.04–1.37) and allele comparison (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.21–1.50). On subgroup analysis based on the ethnicity of population (Caucasians, Asians and others), significant differences were found in all genetic models for Caucasians, similar associations existed in Asians except heterozygote comparison (CC vs. TC). However, the associations were only found in dominant model, heterozygote comparison (TC vs. TT) and allele comparison for the populations named others.

Conclusions

Our investigations demonstrate the significant associations between eNOS − 786C>T polymorphism and CAD risk, and this polymorphism might become an early marker for the risk evaluation of CAD.     

Association of eNOS polymorphisms (-786T>C, 4a4b, 894G>T) with colorectal cancer susceptibility in the Korean population

Background

Polymorphisms of endothelial nitric oxide synthases (eNOS) have been shown to be associated with cancer susceptibility. However, the results of such studies are conflicting to date. We investigated whether polymorphisms of the eNOS gene correlated with patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), relative to healthy individuals.

Patients and methods

In the present study, we analyzed three polymorphisms of eNOS (-786T>C, 4a4b, and 894G>T) in 509 healthy controls and 528 patients with CRC. The genotyping of eNOS polymorphisms was performed using polymerase chain reaction or polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism assays.

Results

We found that the TC+CC genotype of the -786T>C polymorphism was significantly associated with an increased risk of CRC compared with the TT genotype. Similarly, the GT+TT genotype of the 894G>T polymorphism was associated with an increased susceptibility to CRC. However, no evidence was found for any association between the 4a4b polymorphism and CRC risk. In addition, the C/4b/G (-786T>C/4a4b/894G>T) haplotype was significantly associated with increased risk of CRC and C/4b/T (-786T>C/4a4b/894G>T) haplotype was only detected in CRC patients.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that the eNOS -786T>C and 894G>T polymorphisms may be associated with the development of CRC in the Korean population.     

Association of glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms (GSTM1 and GSTT1) with primary open-angle glaucoma: An evidence-based meta-analysis

Studies investigating the associations between glutathione S-transferase (GST) genetic polymorphisms and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) have reported controversial results. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effects of GSTM1 and GSTT1 polymorphisms on POAG risk. Published literatures from PubMed, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science and CBM databases were retrieved. All studies evaluating the association between GSTM1/GSTT1 polymorphisms and POAG were included. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using fixed- or random-effects model. Eleven studies on GSTM1 (1339 cases and 1412 controls) and seven studies on GSTT1 (958 cases, 1003 controls) were included. Overall analysis showed that the association between GSTM1 and GSTT1 null genotype and POAG risk is not statistically significant. Subgroup analyses showed that the null genotype of GSTM1 increased the risk of POAG in Asians. In GSTM1–GSTT1 interaction analysis, individuals with dual null genotype were associated with a significantly increased risk of POAG when compared with the dual present genotype. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis suggested that GSTM1 null genotypes are associated with increased POAG risk in Asian populations but not in Caucasian and mixed populations. Dual null genotype of GSTM1/GSTT1 is associated with increased risk of POAG. Given the limited sample size, the finding on GST polymorphisms needs further investigation.     

The role of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) T‐786C,G894T,and 4a/b gene polymorphisms in the risk of idiopathic male infertility

A considerable number of infertile men have no known mechanism for their infertility. This study aims to examine if there is an association between endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) T‐786C, G894T, and 4a/b gene polymorphisms and idiopathic male infertility. Three hundred fifty‐two men with idiopathic infertility (mean age 32.4 ± 11.4 years) and 356 healthy controls (mean age 33.2 ± 11.6 years) with documented fertility were recruited in this study. Genotypes for T‐786C, G894T, and 4a/b gene polymorphisms were identified by the polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR‐RFLP) analysis. The eNOS ?786CC genotype (0.310 vs. 0.081; odds ratio (OR), 3.64; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.28–4.46; P = 0.001), 894TT genotype (0.131 vs. 0.006; OR, 3.62; 95% CI, 2.68–4.87; P = 0.001) and 4aa genotype (0.128 vs. 0.009; OR, 2.82; 95% CI, 1.88–3.89; P = 0.004) were significantly more frequent in infertile subjects. Furthermore, there was a significant difference between the group of infertile patients with azoospermia and oligoasthenoteratozoospermia (OAT) when compared by genotype distribution (?786CC vs. 786TT, 894TT vs. 894GG, and 4aa vs. 4bb) (all P < 0.01). We also found an association between the eNOS “?786C,” “894T,” and “a” alleles and an increased risk of poor semen parameters. Our data revealed a significant relationship between eNOS genotypes and the phenotype of infertility. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 77: 720–727, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The 4a/4a genotype of the VNTR polymorphism for endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene predicts risk for proliferative diabetic retinopathy in Slovenian patients (Caucasians) with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Thus far only a limited number of studies examined the association between endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) polymorphisms and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). In this report, two polymorphisms in the eNOS gene have been investigated, namely the 894G>T (Glu298Asp) and a 27 bp VNTR (4b/4a), to assess their possible relationships to PDR among Slovenian (Caucasians) type 2 diabetic patients. This cross-sectional case–control study enrolled 577 unrelated Slovenian subjects (Caucasians) with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The case group consisted of 172 patients with PDR and the control group had 405 patients who had no clinical signs of diabetic retinopathy (DR) but did have type 2 diabetes for more than 10 years’ duration. Genotyping of eNOS polymorphisms was carried out with conventional and real-time PCR assays. A significantly higher frequency of the eNOS minor “4a” allele was found in patients with PDR than in controls (23.6 versus 17.7%, p = 0.01). Moreover, the univariate analysis showed a significant association of the 27 bp VNTR 4a/4a genotype and PDR in the recessive model. The odds ratio (OR) of PDR for the 4a/4a genotype to 4b/4a plus 4b/4b was 2.9 (95% CI 1.3–6.2, p = 0.005). Further, the presence of 4a/a genotype was associated with a 3.4-fold (95% CI 1.4–8.6, p = 0.009) increased risk for PDR while adjusted for other risk factors. This is the first study to implicate eNOS 4a/4a homozygous deletion, and hence the “4a” allele, as the genetic risk factors for PDR in Caucasians.     

A genetic variant in the promoter of APE1 gene (− 656 T > G) is associated with breast cancer risk and progression in a Chinese population

Background/aims

APE1 is an important DNA repair protein in the base excision repair pathway. Genetic variations in APE1 have been suggested to influence individuals' susceptibility to human malignancies. The present study was aimed to investigate the associations between two functional polymorphisms in APE1 (− 656 T > G and 1349 T>G) and breast cancer risk.

Methods

We genotyped the two polymorphisms in a case-control study of 500 breast cancer patients and 799 age-matched cancer-free controls using the TaqMan method. Unconditional logistic regression adjusted for potential confounding factors was used to assess the associations.

Results

We found that the variant genotypes of the − 656 T>G were significantly associated with decreased breast cancer risk, compared with the wild genotype [TG/GG vs. TT: adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.56–0.91], and the protective effect of this polymorphism was more predominant among the subgroups of younger subjects (< 52 years) (OR = 0.65, 95% CI = 0.46–0.92). Besides, we found that the variant genotypes were associated with less frequent lymph node metastasis (P = 0.020, OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.44–0.94). We did not observe any significant association between the 1349 T>G polymorphism and breast cancer risk.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the APE1 − 656 T>G but not the 1349 T>G polymorphism may influence the susceptibility and progression of breast cancer in the Chinese population. Large population-based prospective studies are required to validate these findings.