Rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization of the A(2B) adenosine receptor is mediated by a serine residue close to the COOH terminus

The G(s)-coupled rat A(2B) adenosine receptor (A(2B)-AR) was epitope-tagged at the NH(2) terminus with hemagglutinin (HA) and subjected to progressive deletions or point mutations of the COOH terminus in order to determine regions of the receptor that contribute to agonist-induced desensitization and internalization. When expressed stably in Chinese hamster ovary cells, a mutant receptor in which the final 2 amino acids were deleted, the Leu(330)-stop mutant, underwent rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization as did the wild type (WT) receptor. However, the Phe(328) and the Gln(325)-stop mutants were resistant to rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization. Co-expression of arrestin-2-green fluorescent protein (arrestin-2-GFP) with WT receptor or Leu(330)-stop mutant resulted in rapid translocation of arrestin-2-GFP from cytosol to membrane upon agonist addition. On the other hand, agonist activation of the Phe(328)-stop or Gln(325)-stop mutant did not result in translocation of arrestin-2-GFP from cytosol. A COOH terminus point mutant, S329G, was also unable to undergo rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization, indicating that Ser(329) is a critical residue for these processes. A further deletion mutant (Ser(326)-stop) unexpectedly underwent rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization. However, activation of this mutant did not promote translocation of arrestin-2-GFP from cytosol to membrane. In addition, whereas WT receptor internalization was markedly inhibited by co-expression of dominant negative mutants of arrestin-2 (arrestin-2-(319-418)), dynamin (dynamin K44A), or Eps-15 (EDelta95-295), Ser(326)-stop receptor internalization was only inhibited by dominant negative mutant dynamin. Taken together these results indicate that Ser(329), close to the COOH terminus of the rat A(2B)-AR, is critical for the rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization of the receptor. However, deletion of the COOH terminus also uncovers a motif that is able to redirect internalization of the receptor to an arrestin- and clathrin-independent pathway.     

Desensitization and internalization of the human motilin receptor is independent of the C-terminal tail

The motilin receptor (MTLR) is an important therapeutic target for the treatment of hypomotility disorders but desensitization may limit its clinical utility. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the C-terminal tail of the MTLR in the desensitization, phosphorylation and internalization process. Three MTLR mutants, C-terminally truncated from amino acid 412 till 384 (MTLRDelta385), 374 (MTLRDelta375) or 368 (MTLRDelta369), were constructed and C-terminally tagged with an EGFP and stably expressed in CHO cells co-expressing the Ca(2+) indicator apoaequorin. Activity and desensitization were studied by measuring changes in motilin-induced luminescent Ca(2+) rises. Receptor phosphorylation was investigated by immunoprecipitation and MTLR-EGFP internalization was visualized by fluorescence microscopy. Truncation only reduced MTLR affinity and the efficacy to induce Ca(2+) luminescent responses of the MTLRDelta375-EGFP mutant. Furthermore, the region between amino acid 375 and 368 seems to be important for proper cell surface expression of the MTLR since receptors of the MTLRDelta369-EGFP mutant but not of the other mutants were found intracellularly in vesicles. Truncation of the receptor till amino acid 384 or 374 did neither affect desensitization nor internalization. In contrast phosphorylation of the MTLRDelta385-EGFP mutant was reduced by 80% but was not affected in the MTLRDelta375-EGFP mutant. In conclusion, MTLR desensitization and internalization is not dependent on the presence of the C-terminal tail. Truncation favors internalization via either phosphorylation-independent pathways or via phosphorylation of alternative sites in the receptor.     

Mu-opioid receptor desensitization: role of receptor phosphorylation,internalization, and representation

It is generally accepted that the internalization and desensitization of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) involves receptor phosphorylation and beta-arrestin recruitment. However, a mutant MOR, which is truncated after the amino acid residue Ser363 (MOR363D), was found to undergo phosphorylation-independent internalization and desensitization. As expected, MOR363D, missing the putative agonist-induced phosphorylation sites, did not exhibit detectable agonist-induced phosphorylation. MOR363D underwent slower internalization as reflected in the attenuation of membrane translocation of beta-arrestin 2 when compared with wild type MOR, but the level of receptor being internalized was similar to that of wild type MOR after 4 h of etorphine treatment. Furthermore, MOR363D was observed to desensitize faster than that of wild type MOR upon agonist activation. Surface biotinylation assay demonstrated that the wild type receptors recycled back to membrane after agonist-induced internalization, which contributed to the receptor resensitization and thus partially reversed the receptor desensitization. On the contrary, MOR363D did not recycle after internalization. Hence, MOR desensitization is controlled by the receptor internalization and the recycling of internalized receptor to cell surface in an active state. Taken together, our data indicated that receptor phosphorylation is not absolutely required in the internalization, but receptor phosphorylation and subsequent beta-arrestin recruitment play important roles in the resensitization of internalized receptors.     

beta -Arrestins regulate protease-activated receptor-1 desensitization but not internalization or Down-regulation.

The widely expressed beta-arrestin isoforms 1 and 2 bind phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and mediate desensitization and internalization. Phosphorylation of protease-activated receptor-1 (PAR1), a GPCR for thrombin, is important for desensitization and internalization, however, the role of beta-arrestins in signaling and trafficking of PAR1 remains unknown. To assess beta-arrestin function we examined signaling and trafficking of PAR1 in mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) derived from beta-arrestin (betaarr) knockouts. Desensitization of PAR1 signaling was markedly impaired in MEFs lacking both betaarr1 and betaarr2 isoforms compared with wild-type cells. Strikingly, in cells lacking only betaarr1 PAR1 desensitization was also significantly impaired compared with betaarr2-lacking or wild-type cells. In wild-type MEFs, activated PAR1 was internalized through a dynamin- and clathrin-dependent pathway and degraded. Surprisingly, in cells lacking both betaarr1 and betaarr2 activated PAR1 was similarly internalized through a dynamin- and clathrin-dependent pathway and degraded, whereas the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)-AR) failed to internalize. A PAR1 cytoplasmic tail mutant defective in agonist-induced phosphorylation failed to internalize in both wild-type and beta-arrestin knockout cells. Thus, PAR1 appears to utilize a distinct phosphorylation-dependent but beta-arrestin-independent pathway for internalization through clathrin-coated pits. Together, these findings strongly suggest that the individual beta-arrestin isoforms can differentially regulate GPCR desensitization and further reveal a novel mechanism by which GPCRs can internalize through a dynamin- and clathrin-dependent pathway that is independent of arrestins.     

The dynamin-dependent, arrestin-independent internalization of 5-hydroxytryptamine 2A (5-HT2A) serotonin receptors reveals differential sorting of arrestins and 5-HT2A receptors during endocytosis

5-Hydroxytryptamine 2A (5-HT2A) receptors, a major site of action of clozapine and other atypical antipsychotic medications, are, paradoxically, internalized in vitro and in vivo by antagonists and agonists. The mechanisms responsible for this paradoxical regulation of 5-HT2A receptors are unknown. In this study, the arrestin and dynamin dependences of agonist- and antagonist-mediated internalization were investigated in live cells using green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged 5-HT2A receptors (SR2-GFP). Preliminary experiments indicated that GFP tagging of 5-HT2A receptors had no effect on either the binding affinities of several ligands or agonist efficacy. Likewise, both the native receptor and SR2-GFP were internalized via endosomes in vitro. Experiments with a dynamin dominant-negative mutant (dynamin K44A) demonstrated that both agonist- and antagonist-induced internalization were dynamin-dependent. By contrast, both the agonist- and antagonist-induced internalization of SR2-GFP were insensitive to three different arrestin (Arr) dominant-negative mutants (Arr-2 V53D, Arr-2-(319-418), and Arr-3-(284-409)). Interestingly, 5-HT2A receptor activation by agonists, but not antagonists, induced greater Arr-3 than Arr-2 translocation to the plasma membrane. Importantly, the agonist-induced internalization of 5-HT2A receptors was accompanied by differential sorting of Arr-2, Arr-3, and 5-HT2A receptors into distinct plasma membrane and intracellular compartments. The agonist-induced redistribution of Arr-2 and Arr-3 into intracellular vesicles and plasma membrane compartments distinct from those involved in 5-HT2A receptor internalization implies novel roles for Arr-2 and Arr-3 independent of 5-HT2A receptor internalization and desensitization.     

Dual role of the beta2-adrenergic receptor C terminus for the binding of beta-arrestin and receptor internalization

Homologous desensitization of beta2-adrenergic and other G-protein-coupled receptors is a two-step process. After phosphorylation of agonist-occupied receptors by G-protein-coupled receptor kinases, they bind beta-arrestins, which triggers desensitization and internalization of the receptors. Because it is not known which regions of the receptor are recognized by beta-arrestins, we have investigated beta-arrestin interaction and internalization of a set of mutants of the human beta2-adrenergic receptor. Mutation of the four serine/threonine residues between residues 355 and 364 led to the loss of agonist-induced receptor-beta-arrestin2 interaction as revealed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), translocation of beta-arrestin2 to the plasma membrane, and receptor internalization. Mutation of all seven serine/threonine residues distal to residue 381 did not affect agonist-induced receptor internalization and beta-arrestin2 translocation. A beta2-adrenergic receptor truncated distal to residue 381 interacted normally with beta-arrestin2, whereas its ability to internalize in an agonist-dependent manner was compromised. A similar impairment of internalization was observed when only the last eight residues of the C terminus were deleted. Our experiments show that the C terminus distal to residue 381 does not affect the initial interaction between receptor and beta-arrestin, but its last eight amino acids facilitate receptor internalization in concert with beta-arrestin2.     

Visualizing differences in ligand-induced beta-arrestin-GFP interactions and trafficking between three recently characterized G protein-coupled receptors

beta-Arrestin 1-GFP or beta-arrestin 2-GFP were coexpressed transiently with G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 within cells stably expressing the orexin-1, apelin or melanin-concentrating hormone (MCH), receptors. In response to agonist ligands both the orexin-1 and apelin receptors were able to rapidly translocate both beta-arrestin 1-GFP and beta-arrestin 2-GFP from cytoplasm to the plasma membrane. For the MCH receptor this was only observed for beta-arrestin 2-GFP. beta-Arrestin 1-GFP translocated by the apelin receptor remained at the plasma membrane during prolonged exposure to ligand even though the receptor became internalized. By contrast, for the orexin-1 receptor, internalization of beta-arrestin 1-GFP within punctate vesicles could be observed for over 60 min in the continued presence of agonist. Co-internalization of the orexin-1 receptor was observed by monitoring the binding and trafficking of TAMRA-(5- and 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine) labelled orexin-A. Subsequent addition of an orexin-1 receptor antagonist resulted in cessation of incorporation of beta-arrestin 1-GFP into vesicles at the plasma membrane and a gradual clearance of beta-arrestin 1-GFP from intracellular vesicles. For the melanin-concentrating hormone receptor the bulk of translocated beta-arrestin 2-GFP was maintained at concentrated foci close to, or at, the plasma membrane. These results demonstrate very distinct features of beta-arrestin-GFP interactions and trafficking for three G protein-coupled receptors for which the natural ligands have only recently been identified and which were thus previously considered as orphan receptors.     

Ligand-induced trafficking of the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor EDG-1

The endothelial-derived G-protein-coupled receptor EDG-1 is a high-affinity receptor for the bioactive lipid mediator sphingosine-1-phosphate (SPP). In the present study, we constructed the EDG-1-green fluorescent protein (GFP) chimera to examine the dynamics and subcellular localization of SPP-EDG-1 interaction. SPP binds to EDG-1-GFP and transduces intracellular signals in a manner indistinguishable from that seen with the wild-type receptor. Human embryonic kidney 293 cells stably transfected with the EDG-1-GFP cDNA expressed the receptor primarily on the plasma membrane. Exogenous SPP treatment, in a dose-dependent manner, induced receptor translocation to perinuclear vesicles with a tau1/2 of approximately 15 min. The EDG-1-GFP-containing vesicles are distinct from mitochondria but colocalize in part with endocytic vesicles and lysosomes. Neither the low-affinity agonist lysophosphatidic acid nor other sphingolipids, ceramide, ceramide-1-phosphate, or sphingosylphosphorylcholine, influenced receptor trafficking. Receptor internalization was completely inhibited by truncation of the C terminus. After SPP washout, EDG-1-GFP recycles back to the plasma membrane with a tau1/2 of approximately 30 min. We conclude that the high-affinity ligand SPP specifically induces the reversible trafficking of EDG-1 via the endosomal pathway and that the C-terminal intracellular domain of the receptor is critical for this process.     

Different mechanisms regulate lysophosphatidic acid (LPA)-dependent versus phorbol ester-dependent internalization of the LPA1 receptor

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) stimulates cells by activation of five G-protein-coupled receptors, termed LPA 1-5. The LPA 1 receptor is the most widely expressed and is a major regulator of cell migration. In this study, we show that phorbol ester (PMA)-induced internalization of the LPA(1) receptor requires clathrin AP-2 complexes, protein kinase C, and a distal dileucine motif (amino acids 352 and 353) in the cytoplasmic tail but not beta-arrestin. Agonist-dependent internalization of LPA 1, however, requires a cluster of serine residues (amino acids 341-347) located proximal to the dileucine motif, beta-arrestin, and to a lesser extent clathrin AP-2. The serine cluster of LPA 1 is required for beta-arrestin2-GFP translocation to the plasma membrane and signal desensitization. In contrast, the dileucine motif (IL) is required for both basal and PMA-induced internalization. Evidence for the beta-arrestin independence of PMA-induced internalization of LPA 1 comes from the observations that beta-arrestin2-GFP is not recruited to the plasma membrane upon PMA treatment and that LPA 1 is readily internalized in beta-arrestin1/2 knock-out mouse embryonic fibroblasts. These results indicate that distinct molecular mechanisms regulate agonist-dependent and PMA-dependent internalization of the LPA 1 receptor.     

Termination of protease-activated receptor-1 signaling by beta-arrestins is independent of receptor phosphorylation

Protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR1), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) for thrombin, is the prototypic member of a family of protease-activated receptors. PAR1 is irreversibly proteolytically activated; thus, the magnitude and duration of thrombin cellular responses are determined primarily by mechanisms responsible for termination of receptor signaling. Both phosphorylation and beta-arrestins contribute to rapid desensitization of PAR1 signaling. However, the relative contribution of each of these pathways to the termination of PAR1 signaling is not known. Co-expression of PAR1 with beta-arrestin 1 (betaarr1) in COS-7 cells resulted in a marked inhibition of PAR1 signaling, whereas beta-arrestin 2 (betaarr2) was essentially inactive. Strikingly, signaling by a PAR1 cytoplasmic tail mutant defective in agonist-induced phosphorylation was also attenuated more effectively by betaarr1 compared with betaarr2. In contrast, both beta-arrestin isoforms were equally effective at desensitizing the substance P receptor, a classic reversibly activated GPCR. PAR1 coimmunoprecipitated betaarr1 in an agonist-dependent manner, whereas betaarr2 association was virtually undetectable. Remarkably, betaarr1 also interacted with phosphorylation defective PAR1 mutant, whereas betaarr2 did not. Moreover, constitutively active beta-arrestin mutants, betaarr1 R169E and betaarr2 R170E, that bind to activated receptor independent of phosphorylation failed to enhance either wild type or mutant PAR1 desensitization compared with normal versions of these proteins. In contrast, beta-arrestin mutants displayed enhanced activity at desensitizing the serotonin 5-hydroxytryptamine(2A) receptor. Taken together, these results suggest that, in addition to PAR1 cytoplasmic tail phosphorylation itself, beta-arrestin binding independent of phosphorylation promotes desensitization of PAR1 signaling. These findings reveal a new level of complexity in the regulation of protease-activated GPCR signaling.     

Beta-arrestin mediates desensitization and internalization but does not affect dephosphorylation of the thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor

The G protein-coupled thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptor is phosphorylated and binds to beta-arrestin after agonist exposure. To define the importance of receptor phosphorylation and beta-arrestin binding in desensitization, and to determine whether beta-arrestin binding and receptor endocytosis are required for receptor dephosphorylation, we expressed TRH receptors in fibroblasts from mice lacking beta-arrestin-1 and/or beta-arrestin-2. Apparent affinity for [(3)H]MeTRH was increased 8-fold in cells expressing beta-arrestins, including a beta-arrestin mutant that did not permit receptor internalization. TRH caused extensive receptor endocytosis in the presence of beta-arrestins, but receptors remained primarily on the plasma membrane without beta-arrestin. beta-Arrestins strongly inhibited inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate production within 10 s. At 30 min, endogenous beta-arrestins reduced TRH-stimulated inositol phosphate production by 48% (beta-arrestin-1), 71% (beta-arrestin-2), and 84% (beta-arrestins-1 and -2). In contrast, receptor phosphorylation, detected by the mobility shift of deglycosylated receptor, was unaffected by beta-arrestins. Receptors were fully phosphorylated within 15 s of TRH addition. Receptor dephosphorylation was identical with or without beta-arrestins and almost complete 20 min after TRH withdrawal. Blocking endocytosis with hypertonic sucrose did not alter the rate of receptor phosphorylation or dephosphorylation. Expressing receptors in cells lacking Galpha(q) and Galpha(11) or inhibiting protein kinase C pharmacologically did not prevent receptor phosphorylation or dephosphorylation. Overexpression of dominant negative G protein-coupled receptor kinase-2 (GRK2), however, retarded receptor phosphorylation. Receptor activation caused translocation of endogenous GRK2 to the plasma membrane. The results show conclusively that receptor dephosphorylation can take place on the plasma membrane and that beta-arrestin binding is critical for desensitization and internalization.     

Arrestin-mediated ERK activation by gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors: receptor-specific activation mechanisms and compartmentalization

Activation of seven-transmembrane region receptors typically causes their phosphorylation with consequent arrestin binding and desensitization. Arrestins also act as scaffolds, mediating signaling to Raf and ERK and, for some receptors, inhibiting nuclear translocation of ERK. GnRH receptors (GnRHRs) act via Gq/11 to stimulate the phospholipase C/Ca2+/protein kinase C (PKC) cascade and the Raf/MEK/ERK cassette. Uniquely, type I mammalian GnRHRs lack the C-tails that are found in other seven-transmembrane region receptors (including nonmammalian GnRHRs) and are implicated in arrestin binding. Here we have compared ERK signaling by human GnRHRs (hGnRHRs) and Xenopus GnRHRs (XGnRHRs). In HeLa cells, XGnRHRs underwent rapid and arrestin-dependent internalization and caused arrestin/green fluorescent protein (GFP) translocation to the membrane and endosomes, whereas hGnRHRs did not. Internalized XGnRHRs were co-localized with arrestin-GFP, whereas hGnRHRs were not. Both receptors mediated transient ERK phosphorylation and nuclear translocation (revealed by immunohistochemistry or by imaging of co-transfected ERK2-GFP), and for both, ERK phosphorylation was reduced by PKC inhibition but not by inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor autophosphorylation. In the presence of PKC inhibitor, Deltaarrestin-(319-418) blocked XGnRHR-mediated, but not hGnRHR-mediated, ERK phosphorylation. When receptor number was varied, hGnRHRs activated phospholipase C and ERK more efficiently than XGnRHRs but were less efficient at causing ERK2-GFP translocation. At high receptor number, XGnRHRs and hGnRHRs both caused ERK2-GFP translocation to the nucleus, but at low receptor number, XGnRHRs caused ERK2-GFP translocation, whereas hGnRHRs did not. Thus, experiments with XGnRHRs have revealed the first direct evidence of arrestin-mediated (probably G protein-independent) GnRHR signaling, whereas those with hGnRHRs imply that scaffolds other than arrestins can determine GnRHR effects on ERK compartmentalization.     

Properties of secretin receptor internalization differ from those of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor.

The endocytic pathway of the secretin receptor, a class II GPCR, is unknown. Some class I G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), such as the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)-AR), internalize in clathrin-coated vesicles and this process is mediated by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), beta-arrestin, and dynamin. However, other class I GPCRs, for example, the angiotensin II type 1A receptor (AT(1A)R), exhibit different internalization properties than the beta(2)-AR. The secretin receptor, a class II GPCR, is a GRK substrate, suggesting that like the beta(2)-AR, it may internalize via a beta-arrestin and dynamin directed process. In this paper we characterize the internalization of a wild-type and carboxyl-terminal (COOH-terminal) truncated secretin receptor using flow cytometry and fluorescence imaging, and compare the properties of secretin receptor internalization to that of the beta(2)-AR. In HEK 293 cells, sequestration of both the wild-type and COOH-terminal truncated secretin receptors was unaffected by GRK phosphorylation, whereas inhibition of cAMP-dependent protein kinase mediated phosphorylation markedly decreased sequestration. Addition of secretin to cells resulted in a rapid translocation of beta-arrestin to plasma membrane localized receptors; however, secretin receptor internalization was not reduced by expression of dominant negative beta-arrestin. Thus, like the AT(1A)R, secretin receptor internalization is not inhibited by reagents that interfere with clathrin-coated vesicle-mediated internalization and in accordance with these results, we show that secretin and AT(1A) receptors colocalize in endocytic vesicles. This study demonstrates that the ability of secretin receptor to undergo GRK phosphorylation and beta-arrestin binding is not sufficient to facilitate or mediate its internalization. These results suggest that other receptors may undergo endocytosis by mechanisms used by the secretin and AT(1A) receptors and that kinases other than GRKs may play a greater role in GPCR endocytosis than previously appreciated.     

Role for the C-terminus in agonist-induced mu opioid receptor phosphorylation and desensitization

Determining which domains and amino acid residues of the mu opioid receptor are phosphorylated is critical for understanding the mechanism of mu opioid receptor phosphorylation. The role of the C-terminus of the receptor was investigated by examining the C-terminally truncated or point-mutated mu opioid receptors in receptor phosphorylation and desensitization. Both wild-type and mutated receptors were stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. The receptor expression was confirmed by receptor radioligand binding and immunoblottting. After exposure to 5 microM of DAMGO, phosphorylation of the C-terminally truncated receptor and the mutant receptor T394A was reduced to 40 and 10% of that of the wild-type receptor, respectively. Mutation effects on agonist-induced desensitization were studied using adenylyl cyclase inhibition assays. The C-terminally truncated receptor and mutant receptor T394A both showed complete loss of DAMGO-induced desensitization, while the mutant T/S-7A receptor only lost part of its ability to desensitize. Taken together, these results suggest that the C-terminus of the mu opioid receptor participates in receptor phosphorylation and desensitization with threonine 394, a crucial residue for both features. DAMGO-induced mu opioid receptor phosphorylation and desensitization are associated and appear to involve both the mu opioid receptor C-terminus and other domains of the receptor.     

Internalization and desensitization of a green fluorescent protein-tagged P2Y nucleotide receptor are differently controlled by inhibition of calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II

De- and re-sensitization and trafficking of P2Y nucleotide receptors modulate physiological responses of these receptors. Here, we used the rat brain P2Y1 receptor tagged with green fluorescent protein (P2Y1-GFP receptor) expressed in HEK293 human embryonic kidney cells. Ca2+ release was used as a functional test to investigate ATP-induced receptor de- and re-sensitization. By confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), endocytosis of P2Y1-GFP receptor was visualized in live cells. Stimulation of the cells with ATP induced complete receptor endocytosis within 30 min and appearance of the P2Y1 receptor in small vesicles. Removal of the agonist resulted in reappearance of the receptor after 60 min on the plasma membrane. Exposure of the cells to KN-62 and KN-93, inhibitors of the calmodulin dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), prevented receptor internalization upon stimulation with ATP. However, the receptor which was still present on the plasma membrane was desensitized, seen by decreased Ca2+ response. The decreased Ca2+ response after 30-min exposure to ATP can be attributed to desensitization and is not as a result of depletion of internal stores, as the cells exposed to ATP for 30 min exhibited a normal Ca2+ response upon stimulation with thrombin. However, okadaic acid, an inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A), did not affect ATP-induced P2Y1 receptor endocytosis, but delayed the reappearance of the P2Y1 receptor on the plasma membrane after ATP withdrawal. Consistently, in okadaic acid-treated cells the ATP-induced Ca2+ response observed after the 30-min exposure to ATP recovered only partially. Thus, CaMKII seems to be involved in P2Y1 receptor internalization, but not desensitization, whereas protein phosphatase 2A might play a role in recycling of the receptor back to the plasma membrane.     

Role of the cytoplasmic tails of CXCR1 and CXCR2 in mediating leukocyte migration,activation, and regulation

IL-8 (or CXCL8) activates the receptors CXCR1 (IL-8RA) and CXCR2 (IL-8RB) to induce chemotaxis in leukocytes, but only CXCR1 mediates cytotoxic and cross-regulatory signals. This may be due to the rapid internalization of CXCR2. To investigate the roles of the intracellular domains in receptor regulation, wild-type, chimeric, phosphorylation-deficient, and cytoplasmic tail (C-tail) deletion mutants of both receptors were expressed in RBL-2H3 cells and studied for cellular activation, receptor phosphorylation, desensitization, and internalization. All but one chimeric receptor bound IL-8 and mediated signal transduction, chemotaxis, and exocytosis. Upon IL-8 activation, the chimeric receptors underwent receptor phosphorylation and desensitization. One was resistant to internalization, yet it mediated normal levels of beta-arrestin 2 (beta arr-2) translocation. The lack of internalization by this receptor may be due to its reduced association with beta arr-2 and the adaptor protein-2 beta. The C-tail-deleted and phosphorylation-deficient receptors were resistant to receptor phosphorylation, desensitization, arrestin translocation, and internalization. They also mediated greater phosphoinositide hydrolysis and exocytosis and sustained Ca(2+) mobilization, but diminished chemotaxis. These data indicate that phosphorylation of the C-tails of CXCR1 and CXCR2 are required for arrestin translocation and internalization, but are not sufficient to explain the rapid internalization of CXCR2 relative to CXCR1. The data also show that receptor internalization is not required for chemotaxis. The lack of receptor phosphorylation was correlated with greater signal transduction but diminished chemotaxis, indicating that second messenger production, not receptor internalization, negatively regulates chemotaxis.     

Agonist-selective, receptor-specific interaction of human P2Y receptors with beta-arrestin-1 and -2

Interaction of G-protein-coupled receptors with beta-arrestins is an important step in receptor desensitization and in triggering "alternative" signals. By means of confocal microscopy and fluorescence resonance energy transfer, we have investigated the internalization of the human P2Y receptors 1, 2, 4, 6, 11, and 12 and their interaction with beta-arrestin-1 and -2. Co-transfection of each individual P2Y receptor with beta-arrestin-1-GFP or beta-arrestin-2-YFP into HEK-293 cells and stimulation with the corresponding agonists resulted in a receptor-specific interaction pattern. The P2Y(1) receptor stimulated with ADP strongly translocated beta-arrestin-2-YFP, whereas only a slight translocation was observed for beta-arrestin-1-GFP. The P2Y(4) receptor exhibited equally strong translocation for beta-arrestin-1-GFP and beta-arrestin-2-YFP when stimulated with UTP. The P2Y(6), P2Y(11), and P2Y(12) receptor internalized only when GRK2 was additionally co-transfected, but beta-arrestin translocation was only visible for the P2Y(6) and P2Y(11) receptor. The P2Y(2) receptor showed a beta-arrestin translocation pattern that was dependent on the agonist used for stimulation. UTP translocated beta-arrestin-1-GFP and beta-arrestin-2-YFP equally well, whereas ATP translocated beta-arrestin-1-GFP to a much lower extent than beta-arrestin-2-YFP. The same agonist-dependent pattern was seen in fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments between the fluorescently labeled P2Y(2) receptor and beta-arrestins. Thus, the P2Y(2) receptor would be classified as a class A receptor when stimulated with ATP or as a class B receptor when stimulated with UTP. The ligand-specific recruitment of beta-arrestins by ATP and UTP stimulation of P2Y(2) receptors was further found to result in differential stimulation of ERK phosphorylation. This suggests that the two different agonists induce distinct active states of this receptor that show differential interactions with beta-arrestins.     

Real-time visualization of the cellular redistribution of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 and beta-arrestin 2 during homologous desensitization of the substance P receptor

The substance P receptor (SPR) is a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that plays a key role in pain regulation. The SPR desensitizes in the continued presence of agonist, presumably via mechanisms that implicate G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) and beta-arrestins. The temporal relationship of these proposed biochemical events has never been established for any GPCR other than rhodopsin beyond the resolution provided by biochemical assays. We investigate the real-time activation and desensitization of the human SPR in live HEK293 cells using green fluorescent protein conjugates of protein kinase C, GRK2, and beta-arrestin 2. The translocation of protein kinase C betaII-green fluorescent protein to and from the plasma membrane in response to substance P indicates that the human SPR becomes activated within seconds of agonist exposure, and the response desensitizes within 30 s. This desensitization process coincides with a redistribution of GRK2 from the cytosol to the plasma membrane, followed by a robust redistribution of beta-arrestin 2 and a profound change in cell morphology that occurs after 1 min of SPR stimulation. These data establish a role for GRKs and beta-arrestins in homologous desensitization of the SPR and provide the first visual and temporal resolution of the sequence of events underlying homologous desensitization of a GPCR in living cells.     

Identification of NSF as a beta-arrestin1-binding protein. Implications for beta2-adrenergic receptor regulation

Previous studies have demonstrated that beta-arrestin1 serves to target G protein-coupled receptors for internalization via clathrin-coated pits and that its endocytic function is regulated by dephosphorylation at the plasma membrane. Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we have identified a novel beta-arrestin1-binding protein, NSF (N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein), an ATPase essential for many intracellular transport reactions. We demonstrate that purified recombinant beta-arrestin1 and NSF interact in vitro and that these proteins can be coimmunoprecipitated from cells. beta-Arrestin1-NSF complex formation exhibits a conformational dependence with beta-arrestin1 preferentially interacting with the ATP bound form of NSF. In contrast to the beta-arrestin1-clathrin interaction, however, the phosphorylation state of beta-arrestin1 does not affect NSF binding. Functionally, overexpression of NSF in HEK 293 cells significantly enhances agonist-mediated beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2-AR) internalization. Furthermore, when coexpressed with a beta-arrestin1 mutant (betaarr1S412D) that mimics a constitutively phosphorylated form of beta-arrestin1 and that acts as a dominant negative with regards to beta2-AR internalization, NSF rescues the betaarr1S412D-mediated inhibition of beta2-AR internalization. The demonstration of beta-arrestin1-NSF complex formation and the functional consequences of NSF overexpression suggest a hitherto unappreciated role for NSF in facilitating clathrin coat-mediated G protein-coupled receptor internalization.     

Differential regulation of the dopamine D2 and D3 receptors by G protein-coupled receptor kinases and beta-arrestins

The D(2) and D(3) receptors (D(2)R and D(3)R), which are potential targets for antipsychotic drugs, have a similar structural architecture and signaling pathway. Furthermore, in some brain regions they are expressed in the same cells, suggesting that differences between the two receptors might lie in other properties such as their regulation. In this study we investigated, using COS-7 and HEK-293 cells, the mechanism underlying the intracellular trafficking of the D(2)R and D(3)R. Activation of D(2)R caused G protein-coupled receptor kinase-dependent receptor phosphorylation, a robust translocation of beta-arrestin to the cell membrane, and profound receptor internalization. The internalization of the D(2)R was dynamin-dependent, suggesting that a clathrin-coated endocytic pathway is involved. In addition, the D(2)R, upon agonist-mediated internalization, localized to intracellular compartments distinct from those utilized by the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. However, in the case of the D(3)R, only subtle agonist-mediated receptor phosphorylation, beta-arrestin translocation to the plasma membrane, and receptor internalization were observed. Interchange of the second and third intracellular loops of the D(2)R and D(3)R reversed their phenotypes, implicating these regions in the regulatory properties of the two receptors. Our studies thus indicate that functional distinctions between the D(2)R and D(3)R may be found in their desensitization and cellular trafficking properties. The differences in their regulatory properties suggest that they have distinct physiological roles in the brain.