RecQ helicase stimulates both DNA catenation and changes in DNA topology by topoisomerase III

Together, RecQ helicase and topoisomerase III (Topo III) of Escherichia coli comprise a potent DNA strand passage activity that can catenate covalently closed DNA (Harmon, F. G., DiGate, R. J., and Kowalczykowski, S. C. (1999) Mol. Cell 3, 611-620). Here we directly assessed the structure of the catenated DNA species formed by RecQ helicase and Topo III using atomic force microscopy. The images show complex catenated DNA species involving crossovers between multiple double-stranded DNA molecules that are consistent with full catenanes. E. coli single-stranded DNA-binding protein significantly stimulated both the topoisomerase activity of Topo III alone and the DNA strand passage activity of RecQ helicase and Topo III. Titration data suggest that an intermediate of the RecQ helicase unwinding process, perhaps a RecQ helicase-DNA fork, is the target for Topo III action. Catenated DNA is the predominant product under conditions of molecular crowding; however, we also discovered that RecQ helicase and single-stranded DNA-binding protein greatly stimulated the intramolecular strand passage ("supercoiling") activity of Topo III, as revealed by changes in the linking number of uncatenated DNA. Together our results demonstrate that RecQ helicase and Topo III function together to comprise a potent and concerted single-strand DNA passage activity that can mediate both catenation-decatenation processes and changes in DNA topology.     

Effects of conditional depletion of topoisomerase II on cell cycle progression in mammalian cells

Topoisomerase II (Topo II) that decatenates newly synthesized DNA is targeted by many anticancer drugs. Some of these drugs stabilize intermediate complexes of DNA with Topo II and others act as catalytic inhibitors of Topo II. Simultaneous depletion of Topo IIα and Topo IIβ, the two isoforms of mammalian Topo II, prevents cell growth and normal mitosis, but the role of Topo II in other phases of mammalian cell cycle has not yet been elucidated. We have developed a derivative of p53-suppressed human cells with constitutive depletion of Topo IIβ and doxycycline-regulated conditional depletion of Topo IIα. The effects of Topo II depletion on cell cycle progression were analyzed by time-lapse video microscopy, pulse-chase flow cytometry and mitotic morphology. Topo II depletion increased the duration of the cell cycle and mitosis, interfered with chromosome condensation and sister chromatid segregation and led to frequent failure of cell division, ending in either cell death or restitution of polyploid cells. Topo II depletion did not change the rate of DNA replication but increased the duration of G₂. These results define the effects of decreased Topo II activity, rather than intermediate complex stabilization, on the mammalian cell cycle.     

Effects of conditional depletion of topoisomerase II on cell cycle progression in mammalian cells

Topoisomerase II (Topo II) that decatenates newly synthesized DNA is targeted by many anticancer drugs. Some of these drugs stabilize intermediate complexes of DNA with Topo II and others act as catalytic inhibitors of Topo II. Simultaneous depletion of Topo IIα and Topo IIβ, the two isoforms of mammalian Topo II, prevents cell growth and normal mitosis, but the role of Topo II in other phases of mammalian cell cycle has not yet been elucidated. We have developed a derivative of p53-suppressed human cells with constitutive depletion of Topo IIβ and doxycycline-regulated conditional depletion of Topo IIα. The effects of Topo II depletion on cell cycle progression were analyzed by time-lapse video microscopy, pulse-chase flow cytometry and mitotic morphology. Topo II depletion increased the duration of the cell cycle and mitosis, interfered with chromosome condensation and sister chromatid segregation and led to frequent failure of cell division, ending in either cell death or restitution of polyploid cells. Topo II depletion did not change the rate of DNA replication but increased the duration of G₂. These results define the effects of decreased Topo II activity, rather than intermediate complex stabilization, on the mammalian cell cycle.Key words: topoisomerase II, mitosis, G₂, conditional knockdown, S phase, mitotic catastrophe     

Coordination of DNA damage tolerance mechanisms with cell cycle progression in fission yeast

DNA damage tolerance (DDT) mechanisms allow cells to synthesize a new DNA strand when the template is damaged. Many mutations resulting from DNA damage in eukaryotes are generated during DDT when cells use the mutagenic translesion polymerases, Rev1 and Polζ, rather than mechanisms with higher fidelity. The coordination among DDT mechanisms is not well understood. We used live-cell imaging to study the function of DDT mechanisms throughout the cell cycle of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. We report that checkpoint-dependent mitotic delay provides a cellular mechanism to ensure the completion of high fidelity DDT, largely by homology-directed repair (HDR). DDT by mutagenic polymerases is suppressed during the checkpoint delay by a mechanism dependent on Rad51 recombinase. When cells pass the G2/M checkpoint and can no longer delay mitosis, they completely lose the capacity for HDR and simultaneously exhibit a requirement for Rev1 and Polζ. Thus, DDT is coordinated with the checkpoint response so that the activity of mutagenic polymerases is confined to a vulnerable period of the cell cycle when checkpoint delay and HDR are not possible.     

Reprint of “The mechanism of negative DNA supercoiling: A cascade of DNA-induced conformational changes prepares gyrase for strand passage”

DNA topoisomerases inter-convert different DNA topoisomers in the cell. They catalyze the introduction or relaxation of DNA supercoils, as well as catenation and decatenation. Members of the type I topoisomerase family cleave a single strand of their double-stranded DNA substrate, whereas enzymes of the type II family cleave both DNA strands. Bacterial DNA gyrase, a type II topoisomerase, catalyzes the introduction of negative supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction. Gyrase is not present in humans, and constitutes an attractive drug target for the treatment of bacterial and parasite infections. DNA supercoiling by gyrase is believed to occur by a strand passage mechanism, in which one segment of the double-stranded DNA substrate is passed through a (transient) break in a second segment. This mechanism requires the coordinated opening and closing of three protein interfaces, so-called gates, to ensure the directionality of strand passage toward negative supercoiling.Single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments are ideally suited to investigate conformational changes during the catalytic cycle of DNA topoisomerases. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the cascade of DNA- and nucleotide-induced conformational changes in gyrase that lead to strand passage and negative supercoiling of DNA. We discuss how these conformational changes couple ATP hydrolysis to DNA supercoiling in gyrase, and how the common mechanistic principle of coordinated gate opening and closing is modulated to allow for the catalysis of different reactions by different type II topoisomerases.     

Degradation of ATM-Independent Decatenation Checkpoint Function in Human Cells is Secondary to Inactivation of p53 and Correlated with Chromosomal Destabilization

DNA topoisomerase II is required in the cell cycle to decatenate intertwined daughter chromatids prior to mitosis. To study the mechanisms that cells use to accomplish timely chromatid decatenation, the activity of a catenation-responsive checkpoint was monitored in human skin fibroblasts with inherited or acquired defects in the DNA damage G2 checkpoint. G2 delay was quantified shortly after a brief incubation with ICRF-193, which blocks the ability of topoisomerase II to decatenate chromatids, or treatment with ionizing radiation (IR), which damages DNA. Both treatments induced G2 delay in normal human fibroblasts. Ataxia telangiectasia fibroblasts with defective G2 checkpoint response to IR displayed normal G2 delay after treatment with ICRF-193, demonstrating that ATM kinase was not required for signaling when chromatid decatenation was blocked. The G2 delay induced by ICRF-193 was reversed by caffeine, indicating that active checkpoint signaling was involved. ICRF-193-induced G2 delay also was independent of p53 function, being evident in cells expressing HPV16E6 to inactivate p53. However, as fibroblasts expressing HPV16E6 aged in culture, they lost the ability to delay entry to mitosis, both after DNA damage and when decatenation was blocked. This age-related loss of G2 delay in response to ICRF-193 and IR in E6-expressing cells was blocked by induction of telomerase. Expression of telomerase also prevented chromosomal destabilization in aging E6-expressing cells. These observations lead to a new model of genetic instability, in which attenuation of G2 decatenatory checkpoint function permits cells to enter mitosis with insufficiently decatenated chromatids, leading to aneuploidy and polyploidy.

Key Words:

Checkpoints, DNA damage, Decatenation, Topoisomerase II, ICRF-193, Radiation     

The mechanism of negative DNA supercoiling: A cascade of DNA-induced conformational changes prepares gyrase for strand passage

DNA topoisomerases inter-convert different DNA topoisomers in the cell. They catalyze the introduction or relaxation of DNA supercoils, as well as catenation and decatenation. Members of the type I topoisomerase family cleave a single strand of their double-stranded DNA substrate, whereas enzymes of the type II family cleave both DNA strands. Bacterial DNA gyrase, a type II topoisomerase, catalyzes the introduction of negative supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction. Gyrase is not present in humans, and constitutes an attractive drug target for the treatment of bacterial and parasite infections. DNA supercoiling by gyrase is believed to occur by a strand passage mechanism, in which one segment of the double-stranded DNA substrate is passed through a (transient) break in a second segment. This mechanism requires the coordinated opening and closing of three protein interfaces, so-called gates, to ensure the directionality of strand passage toward negative supercoiling.Single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments are ideally suited to investigate conformational changes during the catalytic cycle of DNA topoisomerases. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the cascade of DNA- and nucleotide-induced conformational changes in gyrase that lead to strand passage and negative supercoiling of DNA. We discuss how these conformational changes couple ATP hydrolysis to DNA supercoiling in gyrase, and how the common mechanistic principle of coordinated gate opening and closing is modulated to allow for the catalysis of different reactions by different type II topoisomerases.     

Spindle checkpoint component Mad2 contributes to biorientation of homologous chromosomes

Cell cycle checkpoints sense defects in chromosome metabolism, halt the cell cycle, and activate pathways that repair the defects. The spindle checkpoint arrests the cell cycle in response to defects in the interaction between microtubules and kinetochores (the proteinaceous complex assembled on centromeric DNA), but no repair function has been demonstrated for this checkpoint. We show that the roles of two spindle checkpoint components, Mad2 and Mad3, differ in meiosis I. In the absence of Mad2, meiosis I nondisjunction occurs at a high frequency and can be corrected by delaying the onset of anaphase. The absence of Mad3 does not induce nondisjunction, even though mad3Delta cells cannot arrest the cell cycle in response to kinetochores that lack either microtubules or tension on the linkage between chromosomes and microtubules. The two proteins have different roles in chromosome alignment. Compared to wild type and mad3Delta cells, mad2Delta mutants are slower to attach homologous chromosomes to opposite poles of the spindle. This observation suggests that Mad2 plays a role in reorienting chromosomes that are incorrectly attached to the spindle as well as delaying the cell cycle, whereas Mad3 is needed for the cell cycle delay, but not for chromosome reorientation.     

Listeria monocytogenes induces host DNA damage and delays the host cell cycle to promote infection

Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) is a human intracellular pathogen widely used to uncover the mechanisms evolved by pathogens to establish infection. However, its capacity to perturb the host cell cycle was never reported. We show that Lm infection affects the host cell cycle progression, increasing its overall duration but allowing consecutive rounds of division. A complete Lm infectious cycle induces a S-phase delay accompanied by a slower rate of DNA synthesis and increased levels of host DNA strand breaks. Additionally, DNA damage/replication checkpoint responses are triggered in an Lm dose-dependent manner through the phosphorylation of DNA-PK, H2A.X, and CDC25A and independently from ATM/ATR. While host DNA damage induced exogenously favors Lm dissemination, the override of checkpoint pathways limits infection. We propose that host DNA replication disturbed by Lm infection culminates in DNA strand breaks, triggering DNA damage/replication responses, and ensuring a cell cycle delay that favors Lm propagation.     

MEC3, MEC1, and DDC2 are essential components of a telomere checkpoint pathway required for cell cycle arrest during senescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

When telomerase is absent and/or telomeres become critically short, cells undergo a progressive decline in viability termed senescence. The telomere checkpoint model predicts that cells will respond to a damaged or critically short telomere by transiently arresting and activating repair of the telomere. We examined the senescence of telomerase-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae at the cellular level to ask if the loss of telomerase activity triggers a checkpoint response. As telomerase-deficient mutants were serially subcultured, cells exhibited a progressive decline in average growth rate and an increase in the number of cells delayed in the G2/M stage of the cell cycle. MEC3, MEC1, and DDC2, genes important for the DNA damage checkpoint response, were required for the cell cycle delay in telomerase-deficient cells. In contrast, TEL1, RAD9, and RAD53, genes also required for the DNA damage checkpoint response, were not required for the G2/M delay in telomerase-deficient cells. We propose that the telomere checkpoint is distinct from the DNA damage checkpoint and requires a specific set of gene products to delay the cell cycle and presumably to activate telomerase and/or other telomere repair activities.     

Degradation of ATM-independent decatenation checkpoint function in human cells is secondary to inactivation of p53 and correlated with chromosomal destabilization

DNA topoisomerase II is required in the cell cycle to decatenate intertwined daughter chromatids prior to mitosis. To study the mechanisms that cells use to accomplish timely chromatid decatenation, the activity of a catenation-responsive checkpoint was monitored in human skin fibroblasts with inherited or acquired defects in the DNA damage G2 checkpoint. G2 delay was quantified shortly after a brief incubation with ICRF-193, which blocks the ability of topoisomerase II to decatenate chromatids, or treatment with ionizing radiation (IR), which damages DNA. Both treatments induced G2 delay in normal human fibroblasts. Ataxia telangiectasia fibroblasts with defective G2 checkpoint response to IR displayed normal G2 delay after treatment with ICRF-193, demonstrating that ATM kinase was not required for signaling when chromatid decatenation was blocked. The G2 delay induced by ICRF-193 was reversed by caffeine, indicating that active checkpoint signaling was involved. ICRF-193-induced G2 delay also was independent of p53 function, being evident in cells expressing HPV16E6 to inactivate p53. However, as fibroblasts expressing HPV16E6 aged in culture, they lost the ability to delay entry to mitosis, both after DNA damage and when decatenation was blocked. This age-related loss of G2 delay in response to ICRF-193 and IR in E6-expressing cells was blocked by induction of telomerase. Expression of telomerase also prevented chromosomal destabilization in aging E6-expressing cells. These observations lead to a new model of genetic instability, in which attenuation of G2 decatenatory checkpoint function permits cells to enter mitosis with insufficiently decatenated chromatids, leading to aneuploidy and polyploidy.     

Elevated Levels of the Polo Kinase Cdc5 Override the Mec1/ATR Checkpoint in Budding Yeast by Acting at Different Steps of the Signaling Pathway

Checkpoints are surveillance mechanisms that constitute a barrier to oncogenesis by preserving genome integrity. Loss of checkpoint function is an early event in tumorigenesis. Polo kinases (Plks) are fundamental regulators of cell cycle progression in all eukaryotes and are frequently overexpressed in tumors. Through their polo box domain, Plks target multiple substrates previously phosphorylated by CDKs and MAPKs. In response to DNA damage, Plks are temporally inhibited in order to maintain the checkpoint-dependent cell cycle block while their activity is required to silence the checkpoint response and resume cell cycle progression. Here, we report that, in budding yeast, overproduction of the Cdc5 polo kinase overrides the checkpoint signaling induced by double strand DNA breaks (DSBs), preventing the phosphorylation of several Mec1/ATR targets, including Ddc2/ATRIP, the checkpoint mediator Rad9, and the transducer kinase Rad53/CHK2. We also show that high levels of Cdc5 slow down DSB processing in a Rad9-dependent manner, but do not prevent the binding of checkpoint factors to a single DSB. Finally, we provide evidence that Sae2, the functional ortholog of human CtIP, which regulates DSB processing and inhibits checkpoint signaling, is regulated by Cdc5. We propose that Cdc5 interferes with the checkpoint response to DSBs acting at multiple levels in the signal transduction pathway and at an early step required to resect DSB ends.     

Budding Yeast DNA Damage Adaptation Mutants Exhibit Defects in Mitotic Exit

In the presence of double strand breaks, DNA damage checkpoint halts cell cycle progression. However, cells ultimately escape the checkpoint arrest and re-enter cell cycle in the presence of irreparable DNA damage. cdc5-ad was identified as a mutant that fails to adapt to the cell cycle arrest induced by DNA damage checkpoint. In budding yeast, Cdc5 protein kinase is a component of both MEN and FEAR pathways that are required for mitotic exit. It remains unclear whether the adaptation defect of cdc5-ad mutant cells is related to the function of Cdc5 in mitotic exit. Here we present evidence indicating that cdc5-ad mutant cells exhibit defects in mitotic exit. cdc5-ad mutant cells are sensitive to high dosage of Amn1, a negative regulator of MEN. It also shows synthetic growth defects with mutants in MEN pathway. Moreover, mutants in FEAR pathway exhibit defects in DNA damage adaptation. Thus, we conclude that the compromised mitotic exit pathway contributes to DNA damage adaptation defects in cdc5-ad mutant cells.     

Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway

DNA damage checkpoints lead to the inhibition of cell cycle progression following DNA damage. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mec1 checkpoint protein, a phosphatidylinositol kinase-related protein, is required for transient cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage or DNA replication defects. We show that mec1 kinase-deficient (mec1kd) mutants are indistinguishable from mec1Delta cells, indicating that the Mec1 conserved kinase domain is required for all known Mec1 functions, including cell viability and proper DNA damage response. Mec1kd variants maintain the ability to physically interact with both Ddc2 and wild-type Mec1 and cause dominant checkpoint defects when overproduced in MEC1 cells, impairing the ability of cells to slow down S phase entry and progression after DNA damage in G(1) or during S phase. Conversely, an excess of Mec1kd in MEC1 cells does not abrogate the G(2)/M checkpoint, suggesting that Mec1 functions required for response to aberrant DNA structures during specific cell cycle stages can be separable. In agreement with this hypothesis, we describe two new hypomorphic mec1 mutants that are completely defective in the G(1)/S and intra-S DNA damage checkpoints but properly delay nuclear division after UV irradiation in G(2). The finding that these mutants, although indistinguishable from mec1Delta cells with respect to the ability to replicate a damaged DNA template, do not lose viability after UV light and methyl methanesulfonate treatment suggests that checkpoint impairments do not necessarily result in hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents.     

DNA replication as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint

Faithful inheritance of the genome from mother to daughter cell requires that it is replicated accurately, in its entirety, exactly once. DNA replication not only has to have high fidelity, but also has to cope with exogenous and endogenous agents that damage DNA during the life cycle of a cell. The DNA damage checkpoint, which monitors and responds to defects in the genome, is critical for the completion of replication. The focus of this review is how DNA replication is regulated by the checkpoint response in the presence of DNA damage and fork stalling agents.     

Top3 processes recombination intermediates and modulates checkpoint activity after DNA damage

Mutation of TOP3 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae causes poor growth, hyperrecombination, and a failure to fully activate DNA damage checkpoints in S phase. Here, we report that overexpression of a dominant-negative allele of TOP3, TOP3(Y356F), which lacks the catalytic (decatenation) activity of Top3, causes impaired S-phase progression and the persistence of abnormal DNA structures (X-shaped DNA molecules) after exposure to methylmethanesulfonate. The impaired S-phase progression is due to a persistent checkpoint-mediated cell cycle delay and can be overridden by addition of caffeine. Hence, the catalytic activity of Top3 is not required for DNA damage checkpoint activation, but it is required for normal S-phase progression after DNA damage. We also present evidence that the checkpoint-mediated cell cycle delay and persistence of X-shaped DNA molecules resulting from overexpression of TOP3(Y356F) are downstream of Rad51 function. We propose that Top3 functions in S phase to both process homologous recombination intermediates and modulate checkpoint activity.     

PICH promotes mitotic chromosome segregation: Identification of a novel role in rDNA disjunction

PICH is an SNF2-family DNA translocase that appears to play a role specifically in mitosis. Characterization of PICH in human cells led to the initial discovery of “ultra-fine DNA bridges” (UFBs) that connect the 2 segregating DNA masses in the anaphase of mitosis. These bridge structures, which arise from specific regions of the genome, are a normal feature of anaphase but had escaped detection previously because they do not stain with commonly used DNA dyes. Nevertheless, UFBs are important for genome maintenance because defects in UFB resolution can lead to cytokinesis failure. We reported recently that PICH stimulates the unlinking (decatenation) of entangled DNA by Topoisomerase IIα (Topo IIα), and is important for the resolution of UFBs. We also demonstrated that PICH and Topo IIα co-localize at the rDNA (rDNA). In this Extra View article, we discuss the mitotic roles of PICH and explore further the role of PICH in the timely segregation of the rDNA locus.     

The chromatin-remodeling factor CHD4 coordinates signaling and repair after DNA damage

In response to ionizing radiation (IR), cells delay cell cycle progression and activate DNA repair. Both processes are vital for genome integrity, but the mechanisms involved in their coordination are not fully understood. In a mass spectrometry screen, we identified the adenosine triphosphate–dependent chromatin-remodeling protein CHD4 (chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 4) as a factor that becomes transiently immobilized on chromatin after IR. Knockdown of CHD4 triggers enhanced Cdc25A degradation and p21^Cip1 accumulation, which lead to more pronounced cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition and extended cell cycle delay. At DNA double-strand breaks, depletion of CHD4 disrupts the chromatin response at the level of the RNF168 ubiquitin ligase, which in turn impairs local ubiquitylation and BRCA1 assembly. These cell cycle and chromatin defects are accompanied by elevated spontaneous and IR-induced DNA breakage, reduced efficiency of DNA repair, and decreased clonogenic survival. Thus, CHD4 emerges as a novel genome caretaker and a factor that facilitates both checkpoint signaling and repair events after DNA damage.