Nucleotide excision repair in higher eukaryotes: Mechanism of primary damage recognition

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is one of the major DNA repair pathways in eukaryotic cells. NER removes structurally diverse lesions such as pyrimidine dimers, arising upon UV irradiation, and bulky chemical adducts, arising upon exposure to carcinogens and some chemotherapeutic drugs. NER defects lead to severe diseases, including some forms of cancer. In view of the broad substrate specificity of NER, it is of interest to study how a certain set of proteins recognizes DNA lesions in contest of a large excess of intact DNA. The review focuses on DNA damage recognition, the key and, as yet, most questionable step of NER. The main models of primary damage recognition and preincision complex assembly are considered. The model of a sequential loading of repair proteins on damaged DNA seems most reasonable in light of the available data.     

Regulation of endonuclease activity in human nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a DNA repair pathway that is responsible for removing a variety of lesions caused by harmful UV light, chemical carcinogens, and environmental mutagens from DNA. NER involves the concerted action of over 30 proteins that sequentially recognize a lesion, excise it in the form of an oligonucleotide, and fill in the resulting gap by repair synthesis. ERCC1-XPF and XPG are structure-specific endonucleases responsible for carrying out the incisions 5' and 3' to the damage respectively, culminating in the release of the damaged oligonucleotide. This review focuses on the recent work that led to a greater understanding of how the activities of ERCC1-XPF and XPG are regulated in NER to prevent unwanted cuts in DNA or the persistence of gaps after incision that could result in harmful, cytotoxic DNA structures.     

Nucleotide excision repair: DNA damage recognition and preincision complex assembly

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is one of the major DNA repair pathways in eukaryotic cells counteracting genetic changes caused by DNA damage. NER removes a wide set of structurally diverse lesions such as pyrimidine dimers arising upon UV irradiation and bulky chemical adducts arising upon exposure to carcinogens or chemotherapeutic drugs. NER defects lead to severe diseases including some forms of cancer. In view of the broad substrate specificity of NER, it is of interest to understand how a certain set of proteins recognizes various DNA lesions in the context of a large excess of intact DNA. This review focuses on DNA damage recognition and following stages resulting in preincision complex assembly, the key and still most unclear steps of NER. The major models of primary damage recognition and preincision complex assembly are considered. The contribution of affinity labeling techniques in study of this process is discussed.     

Checkpoint arrest signaling in response to UV damage is independent of nucleotide excision repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The recognition of DNA double-stranded breaks or single-stranded DNA gaps as a precondition for cell cycle checkpoint arrest has been well established. However, how bulky base damage such as UV-induced pyrimidine dimers elicits a checkpoint response has remained elusive. Nucleotide excision repair represents the main pathway for UV dimer removal that results in strand interruptions. However, we demonstrate here that Rad53p hyperphosphorylation, an early event of checkpoint signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is independent of nucleotide excision repair (NER), even if replication as a source of secondary DNA damage is excluded. Thus, our data hint at primary base damage or at UV damage (primary or secondary) that does not need to be processed by NER as the relevant substrate of damage-sensing checkpoint proteins.     

Light and dark in chromatin repair: repair of UV-induced DNA lesions by photolyase and nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) and DNA repair by photolyase in the presence of light (photoreactivation) are the major pathways to remove UV-induced DNA lesions from the genome, thereby preventing mutagenesis and cell death. Photoreactivation was found in many prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, but not in mammals, while NER seems to be universally distributed. Since packaging of eukaryotic DNA in nucleosomes and higher order chromatin structures affects DNA structure and accessibility, damage formation and repair are coupled intimately to structural and dynamic properties of chromatin. Here, I review recent progress in the study of repair of chromatin and transcribed genes. Photoreactivation and NER are discussed as examples of how an individual enzyme and a complex repair pathway, respectively, access DNA lesions in chromatin and how these two repair processes fulfil complementary roles in removal of UV lesions. These repair pathways provide insight into the structural and dynamic properties of chromatin and suggest how other DNA repair processes could work in chromatin.     

Damage recognition in nucleotide excision repair of DNA

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is found throughout nature, in eubacteria, eukaryotes and archaea. In human cells it is the main pathway for the removal of damage caused by UV light, but it also acts on a wide variety of other bulky helix-distorting lesions caused by chemical mutagens. An ongoing challenge is to understand how a site of DNA damage is located during NER and distinguished from non-damaged sites. This article reviews information on damage recognition in mammalian cells and the bacterium Escherichia coli. In mammalian cells the XPC-hHR23B, XPA, RPA and TFIIH factors may all have a role in damage recognition. XPC-hHR23B has the strongest affinity for damaged DNA in some assays, as does the similar budding yeast complex Rad4-Rad23. There is current discussion as to whether XPC or XPA acts first in the repair process to recognise damage or distortions. TFIIH may play a role in distinguishing the damaged strand from the non-damaged one, if translocation along a DNA strand by the TFIIH DNA helicases is interrupted by encountering a lesion. The recognition and incision steps of human NER use 15 to 18 polypeptides, whereas E. coli requires only three proteins to obtain a similar result. Despite this, many remarkable similarities in the NER mechanism have emerged between eukaryotes and bacteria. These include use of a distortion-recognition factor, a strand separating helicase to create an open preincision complex, participation of structure-specific endonucleases and the lack of a need for certain factors when a region containing damage is already sufficiently distorted.     

Repair of bulky DNA lesions deriving from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Genomic DNA is damaged by a variety of factors exerting an adverse effect on human health, such as environmental pollution, UV light, ionizing radiation, and toxic compounds. Air pollution with products of incomplete combustion of hydrocarbon fuels and wastes of various industries are main sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, whose metabolites can damage DNA by forming bulky DNA adducts, which potentially lead to mutations and cancer. Nucleotide excision repair is the main pathway that eliminates these lesions in eukaryotic cells. The excision efficiency of bulky adducts depends on many factors, including the structure of a bulky substituent and the degree of DNA double helix distortion induced by a lesion. Clustered DNA lesions are the most dangerous for the cell. Several DNA repair systems cooperate to recognize and remove such lesions. The review focuses on the mechanisms that repair DNA with single and clustered bulky lesions, taking the natural carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene as an example.     

Mutations in Replicative Stress Response Pathways Are Associated with S Phase-specific Defects in Nucleotide Excision Repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a highly conserved pathway that removes helix-distorting DNA lesions induced by a plethora of mutagens, including UV light. Our laboratory previously demonstrated that human cells deficient in either ATM and Rad3-related (ATR) kinase or translesion DNA polymerase η (i.e. key proteins that promote the completion of DNA replication in response to UV-induced replicative stress) are characterized by profound inhibition of NER exclusively during S phase. Toward elucidating the mechanistic basis of this phenomenon, we developed a novel assay to quantify NER kinetics as a function of cell cycle in the model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Using this assay, we demonstrate that in yeast, deficiency of the ATR homologue Mec1 or of any among several other proteins involved in the cellular response to replicative stress significantly abrogates NER uniquely during S phase. Moreover, initiation of DNA replication is required for manifestation of this defect, and S phase NER proficiency is correlated with the capacity of individual mutants to respond to replicative stress. Importantly, we demonstrate that partial depletion of Rfa1 recapitulates defective S phase-specific NER in wild type yeast; moreover, ectopic RPA1–3 overexpression rescues such deficiency in either ATR- or polymerase η-deficient human cells. Our results strongly suggest that reduction of NER capacity during periods of enhanced replicative stress, ostensibly caused by inordinate sequestration of RPA at stalled DNA replication forks, represents a conserved feature of the multifaceted eukaryotic DNA damage response.     

CENTRIN2 Interacts with the Arabidopsis Homolog of the Human XPC Protein (AtRAD4) and Contributes to Efficient Synthesis-dependent Repair of Bulky DNA Lesions

Arabidopsis thaliana CENTRIN2 (AtCEN2) has been shown to modulate Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) and Homologous Recombination (HR). The present study provides evidence that AtCEN2 interacts with the Arabidopsis homolog of human XPC, AtRAD4 and that the distal EF-hand Ca²⁺ binding domain is essential for this interaction. In addition, the synthesis-dependent repair efficiency of bulky DNA lesions was enhanced in cell extracts prepared from Arabidopsis plants overexpressing the full length AtCEN2 but not in those overexpressing a truncated AtCEN2 form, suggesting a role for the distal EF-hand Ca²⁺ binding domain in the early step of the NER process. Upon UV-C treatment the AtCEN2 protein was shown to be increased in concentration and to be localised in the nucleus rapidly. Taken together these data suggest that AtCEN2 is a part of the AtRAD4 recognition complex and that this interaction is required for efficient NER. In addition, NER and HR appear to be differentially modulated upon exposure of plants to DNA damaging agents. This suggests in plants, that processing of bulky DNA lesions highly depends on the excision repair efficiency, especially the recognition step, thus influencing the recombinational repair pathway.     

XPA protein as a limiting factor for nucleotide excision repair and UV sensitivity in human cells

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) acts on a variety of DNA lesions, including damage induced by many chemotherapeutic drugs. Cancer therapy with such drugs might be improved by reducing the NER capacity of tumors. It is not known, however to what extent any individual NER protein is rate-limiting for any step of the repair reaction. We studied sensitivity to UV radiation and repair of DNA damage with regard to XPA, one of the core factors in the NER incision complex. About 150,000-200,000 molecules of XPA protein are present in NER proficient human cell lines, and no XPA protein in the XP-A cell line XP12RO. Transfected XP12RO cell lines expressing 50,000 or more XPA molecules/cell showed UV resistance similar to normal cells. Suppression of XPA protein to approximately 10,000 molecules/cell in a Tet-regulatable system modestly but significantly increased sensitivity to UV irradiation. No removal of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers was detected in the SV40 immortalized cell lines tested. Repair proficient WI38-VA fibroblasts and transfected XP-A cells expressing 150,000 molecules of XPA/cell removed (6-4) photoproducts from the genome with a half-life of 1h. Cells in which XPA protein was reduced to about 10,000 molecules/cell removed (6-4) photoproducts more slowly, with a half-life of 3h. A reduced rate of repair of (6-4) photoproducts thus results in increased cellular sensitivity towards UV irradiation. These data indicate that XPA levels must be reduced to <10% of that present in a normal cell to render XPA a limiting factor for NER and consequent cellular sensitivity. To inhibit NER, it may be more effective to interfere with XPA protein function, rather than reducing XPA protein levels.     

Plant homologue of human excision repair gene ERCC1 points to conservation of DNA repair mechanisms

Nucleotide excision repair (NER), a highly versatile DNA repair mechanism, is capable of removing various types of DNA damage including those induced by UV radiation and chemical mutagens. NER has been well characterized in yeast and mammalian systems but its presence in plants has not been reported. Here it is reported that a plant gene isolated from male germline cells of lily (Lilium longiflorum) shows a striking amino acid sequence similarity to the DNA excision repair proteins human ERCC1 and yeast RAD10. Homologous genes are also shown to be present in a number of taxonomically diverse plant genera tested, suggesting that this gene may have a conserved function in plants. The protein encoded by this gene is able to correct significantly the sensitivity to the cross-linking agent mitomycin C in ERCC1-deficient Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. These findings suggest that the NER mechanism is conserved in yeast, animals and higher plants.     

No detectable DNA excision repair in UV-exposed hepatocytes from two catfish species

DNA repair is a critical process in protecting cellular genetic information from mutation. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a mechanism by which cells correct DNA damage caused by agents that form bulky covalent adducts and UV photoproducts such as thymine dimers and 6-4 photoproduct. NER, sometimes called dark repair, is generally accepted as being low in fish compared to mammals. This study was designed to quantitate NER in two related catfish species that have known differential sensitivities to liver carcinomas. The original hypothesis was that the more cancer resistant species, channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), would have more efficient DNA repair compared to the more sensitive brown bullhead (Ameriurus nebulosus). In order to measure NER, primary cultured hepatocytes of both species were exposed to UV light (10-40 J/m2) and collected at 0, 24, 48 and 72 h after exposure. Total DNA was extracted from the cells and incubated with T4 endonuclease V. Using alkaline gel electrophoresis, endonuclease sensitive sites (ESS) were quantified. Results from the ESS assay indicated there was a UV dose-response increase in thymine dimers from 0 to 40 J/m2. However, no repair (decrease in number of ESS) occurred in either fish species over a 72-h time period. When cells were exposed to photoreactivating fluorescent light, repair was detected. These studies highlight the difficulty of measuring NER in fish and are consistent with the low levels of NER reported by other researchers in fish.