Functional Diversification after Gene Duplication: Paralog Specific Regions of Structural Disorder and Phosphorylation in p53, p63, and p73

Conformational and functional flexibility promote protein evolvability. High evolvability allows related proteins to functionally diverge and perhaps to neostructuralize. p53 is a multifunctional protein frequently referred to as the Guardian of the Genome–a hub for e.g. incoming and outgoing signals in apoptosis and DNA repair. p53 has been found to be structurally disordered, an extreme form of conformational flexibility. Here, p53, and its paralogs p63 and p73, were studied for further insights into the evolutionary dynamics of structural disorder, secondary structure, and phosphorylation. This study is focused on the post gene duplication phase for the p53 family in vertebrates, but also visits the origin of the protein family and the early domain loss and gain events. Functional divergence, measured by rapid evolutionary dynamics of protein domains, structural properties, and phosphorylation propensity, is inferred across vertebrate p53 proteins, in p63 and p73 from fish, and between the three paralogs. In particular, structurally disordered regions are redistributed among paralogs, but within clades redistribution of structural disorder also appears to be an ongoing process. Despite its deemed importance as the Guardian of the Genome, p53 is indeed a protein with high evolvability as seen not only in rearranged structural disorder, but also in fluctuating domain sequence signatures among lineages.     

Comparison of the human and worm p53 structures suggests a way for enhancing stability

Maintaining the native conformation is essential for the proper function of tumor suppressor protein p53. However, p53 is a low-stability protein that can easily lose its function upon structural perturbations such as those resulting from missense mutations, leading to the development of cancer. Therefore, it is important to develop strategies to design stable p53 which still maintains its normal function. Here, we compare the stabilities of the human and worm p53 core domains using molecular dynamics simulations. We find that the worm p53 is significantly more stable than the human form. Detailed analysis of the structural fluctuations shows that the stability difference lies in the peripheral structural motifs that contrast in their structural features and flexibility. The most dramatic difference in stability originates from loop L1, from the turn between helix H1 and beta-strand S5, and from the turn that connects beta-strands S7 and S8. Structural analysis shows significant differences for these motifs between the two proteins. Loop L1 lacks secondary structure, and the turns between helix H1 and strand S5 and between strands S7 and S8 are much longer in the human form p53. On the basis of these differences, we designed a mutant by shortening the turn between strands S7 and S8 to enhance the stability. Surprisingly, this mutant was very stable when probed by molecular dynamics simulations. In addition, the stabilization was not localized in the turn region. Loop L1 was also significantly stabilized. Our results show that stabilizing peripheral structural motifs can greatly enhance the stability of the p53 core domain and therefore is likely to be a viable alternative in the development of stable p53. In addition, loop- or turn-related mutants with different stabilities may also be used to probe the relationship between function, a particular structural motif, and its flexibility.     

Analysis of molecular interactions of the p53-family p51(p63) gene products in a yeast two-hybrid system: homotypic and heterotypic interactions and association with p53-regulatory factors

p51 in the p53 tumor suppressor family, also referred to as p63, encodes multiple isoforms including p51A (TAp63gamma) and p51B (TAp63alpha). The p53 protein forms a tetramer, and its stability and activity are regulated by molecular association with viral and cellular proteins and by biochemical modifications. Using a yeast two-hybrid system, the p51A and p51B isoforms were examined for homotypic and heterotypic interactions in the p53 family proteins and for their affinity to the p53-regulatory factors. Results indicate a homotypic interaction dependent on the presumed oligomerization domain of the p51 proteins. The possibility of a weak heterotypic interaction between p51 and p73 proteins was suggested, while association between p51 and p53 appeared improbable. Furthermore, unlike p53, the p51 proteins failed to display an affinity to SV40 large T antigen or MDM2-family proteins. Having several features in common with p53, the p51 proteins may function in biological processes apart from p53.     

Molecular dynamics of the full-length p53 monomer

The p53 protein is frequently mutated in a very large proportion of human tumors, where it seems to acquire gain-of-function activity that facilitates tumor onset and progression. A possible mechanism is the ability of mutant p53 proteins to physically interact with other proteins, including members of the same family, namely p63 and p73, inactivating their function. Assuming that this interaction might occurs at the level of the monomer, to investigate the molecular basis for this interaction, here, we sample the structural flexibility of the wild-type p53 monomeric protein. The results show a strong stability up to 850 ns in the DNA binding domain, with major flexibility in the N-terminal transactivations domains (TAD1 and TAD2) as well as in the C-terminal region (tetramerization domain). Several stable hydrogen bonds have been detected between N-terminal or C-terminal and DNA binding domain, and also between N-terminal and C-terminal. Essential dynamics analysis highlights strongly correlated movements involving TAD1 and the proline-rich region in the N-terminal domain, the tetramerization region in the C-terminal domain; Lys120 in the DNA binding region. The herein presented model is a starting point for further investigation of the whole protein tetramer as well as of its mutants.     

The structure of p53 tumour suppressor protein reveals the basis for its functional plasticity

p53 major tumour suppressor protein has presented a challenge for structural biology for two decades. The intact and complete p53 molecule has eluded previous attempts to obtain its structure, largely due to the intrinsic flexibility of the protein. Using ATP-stabilised p53, we have employed cryoelectron microscopy and single particle analysis to solve the first three-dimensional structure of the full-length p53 tetramer (resolution 13.7 A). The p53 molecule is a D2 tetramer, resembling a hollow skewed cube with node-like vertices of two sizes. Four larger nodes accommodate central core domains, as was demonstrated by fitting of its X-ray structure. The p53 monomers are connected via their juxtaposed N- and C-termini within smaller N/C nodes to form dimers. The dimers form tetramers through the contacts between core nodes and N/C nodes. This structure revolutionises existing concepts of p53's molecular organisation and resolves conflicting data relating to its biochemical properties. This architecture of p53 in toto suggests novel mechanisms for structural plasticity, which enables the protein to bind variably spaced DNA target sequences, essential for p53 transactivation and tumour suppressor functions.     

Protein domain definition should allow for conditional disorder

Abstract: Proteins are often classified in a binary fashion as either structured or disordered. However this approach has several deficits. Firstly, protein folding is always conditional on the physiochemical environment. A protein which is structured in some circumstances will be disordered in others. Secondly, it hides a fundamental asymmetry in behavior. While all structured proteins can be unfolded through a change in environment, not all disordered proteins have the capacity for folding. Failure to accommodate these complexities confuses the definition of both protein structural domains and intrinsically disordered regions. We illustrate these points with an experimental study of a family of small binding domains, drawn from the RNA polymerase of mumps virus and its closest relatives. Assessed at face value the domains fall on a structural continuum, with folded, partially folded, and near unstructured members. Yet the disorder present in the family is conditional, and these closely related polypeptides can access the same folded state under appropriate conditions. Any heuristic definition of the protein domain emphasizing conformational stability divides this domain family in two, in a way that makes no biological sense. Structural domains would be better defined by their ability to adopt a specific tertiary structure: a structure that may or may not be realized, dependent on the circumstances. This explicitly allows for the conditional nature of protein folding, and more clearly demarcates structural domains from intrinsically disordered regions that may function without folding.     

Intrinsically disordered regions of p53 family are highly diversified in evolution

Proteins of the p53 family are expressed in vertebrates and in some invertebrate species. The main function of these proteins is to control and regulate cell cycle in response to various cellular signals, and therefore to control the organism's development. The regulatory functions of the p53 family members originate mostly from their highly-conserved and well-structured DNA-binding domains. Many human diseases (including various types of cancer) are related to the missense mutations within this domain. The ordered DNA-binding domains of the p53 family members are surrounded by functionally important intrinsically disordered regions. In this study, substitution rates and propensities in different regions of p53 were analyzed. The analyses revealed that the ordered DNA-binding domain is conserved, whereas disordered regions are characterized by high sequence diversity. This diversity was reflected both in the number of substitutions and in the types of substitutions to which each amino acid was prone. These results support the existence of a positive correlation between protein intrinsic disorder and sequence divergence during the evolutionary process. This higher sequence divergence provides strong support for the existence of disordered regions in p53 in vivo for if they were structured, they would evolve at similar rates as the rest of the protein.     

PTB or not PTB -- that is the question

Phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domains are structurally conserved modules found in proteins involved in numerous biological processes including signaling through cell-surface receptors and protein trafficking. While their original discovery is attributed to the recognition of phosphotyrosine in the context of NPXpY sequences -- a function distinct from that of the classical src homology 2 (SH2) domain -- recent studies show that these protein modules have much broader ligand binding specificities. These studies highlight the functional diversity of the PTB domain family as generalized protein interaction domains, and reinforce the concept that evolutionary changes of structural elements around the ligand binding site on a conserved structural core may endow these protein modules with the structural plasticity necessary for functional versatility.     

Conserved tryptophan mutation disrupts structure and function of immunoglobulin domain revealing unusual tyrosine fluorescence

Immunoglobulin (Ig) domains are the most prevalent protein domain structure and share a highly conserved folding pattern; however, this structural family of proteins is also the most diverse in terms of biological roles and tissue expression. Ig domains vary significantly in amino acid sequence but share a highly conserved tryptophan in the hydrophobic core of this beta‐stranded protein. Palladin is an actin binding and bundling protein that has five Ig domains and plays an important role in normal cell adhesion and motility. Mutation of the core tryptophan in one Ig domain of palladin has been identified in a pancreatic cancer cell line, suggesting a crucial role for this sole tryptophan in palladin Ig domain structure, stability, and function. We found that actin binding and bundling was not completely abolished with removal of this tryptophan despite a partially unfolded structure and significantly reduced stability of the mutant Ig domain as shown by circular dichroism investigations. In addition, this mutant palladin domain displays a tryptophan‐like fluorescence attributed to an anomalous tyrosine emission at 341 nm. Our results indicate that this emission originates from a tyrosinate that may be formed in the excited ground state by proton transfer to a nearby aspartic acid residue. Furthermore, this study emphasizes the importance of tryptophan in protein structural stability and illustrates how tyrosinate emission contributions may be overlooked during the interpretation of the fluorescence properties of proteins.     

p73 and p63: Why Do We Still Need Them?

When p73 and p63 were initially described as homologues of the tumor suppressor p53, the three family members seemed almost exchangeable, raising the question why all three were retained during evolution. It later turned out that the corresponding genes, TP63 and TP73, appear phylogenetically older than TP53, and that their targeted deletion causes severe developmental defects, in contrast to a deletion of TP53. Hence, p63 and p73 are responsible for biological effects that cannot be elicited by p53 alone. Here, we provide an overview of properties ascribed to p63 and p73 that distinguish them from p53. Differences occur at the following levels: i) protein structure, especially with regard to the aminoterminal transactivation domains and the carboxyterminal portions unique to p63 and p73; ii) regulation, affecting mRNA levels, posttranslational modifications and interaction with other cellular proteins; iii) activities, resulting in the regulation of gene expression, the programming of development, and the emergence of tumors. We speculate that, during the course of evolution, p63 and p73 have first pursued a broader range of activities, whereas p53 later specialized on genome maintenance.     

Molecular evolution and structural analysis of the Ca(2+) release-activated Ca(2+) channel subunit, Orai

Depletion of intracellular Ca(2+) stores evokes Ca(2+) entry across the plasma membrane by inducing Ca(2+) release-activated Ca(2+) (CRAC) currents in many cell types. Recently, Orai and STIM proteins were identified as the molecular identities of the CRAC channel subunit and the endoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+) sensor, respectively. Here, extensive database searching and phylogenetic analysis revealed several lineage-specific duplication events in the Orai protein family, which may account for the evolutionary origins of distinct functional properties among mammalian Orai proteins. Based on similarity to key structural domains and essential residues for channel functions in Orai proteins, database searching also identifies a putative primordial Orai sequence in hyperthermophilic archaeons. Furthermore, modern Orai appears to acquire new structural domains as early as Urochodata, before divergence into vertebrates. The evolutionary patterns of structural domains might be related to distinct functional properties of Drosophila and mammalian CRAC currents. Interestingly, Orai proteins display two conserved internal repeats located at transmembrane segments 1 and 3, both of which contain key amino acids essential for channel function. These findings demonstrate biochemical and physiological relevance of Orai proteins in light of different evolutionary origins and will provide novel insights into future structural and functional studies of Orai proteins.     

Structural diversity of p63 and p73 isoforms

AbstractThe p53 protein family is the most studied protein family of all. Sequence analysis and structure determination have revealed a high similarity of crucial domains between p53, p63 and p73. Functional studies, however, have shown a wide variety of different tasks in tumor suppression, quality control and development. Here we review the structure and organization of the individual domains of p63 and p73, the interaction of these domains in the context of full-length proteins and discuss the evolutionary origin of this protein family. Facts

• Distinct physiological roles/functions are performed by specific isoforms.
• The non-divided transactivation domain of p63 has a constitutively high activity while the transactivation domains of p53/p73 are divided into two subdomains that are regulated by phosphorylation.
• Mdm2 binds to all three family members but ubiquitinates only p53.
• TAp63α forms an autoinhibited dimeric state while all other vertebrate p53 family isoforms are constitutively tetrameric.
• The oligomerization domain of p63 and p73 contain an additional helix that is necessary for stabilizing the tetrameric states. During evolution this helix got lost independently in different phylogenetic branches, while the DNA binding domain became destabilized and the transactivation domain split into two subdomains.

Open questions

• Is the autoinhibitory mechanism of mammalian TAp63α conserved in p53 proteins of invertebrates that have the same function of genomic quality control in germ cells?
• What is the physiological function of the p63/p73 SAM domains?
• Do the short isoforms of p63 and p73 have physiological functions?
• What are the roles of the N-terminal elongated TAp63 isoforms, TA* and GTA?

Subject terms: X-ray crystallography, Solution-state NMR     

Molecular interactions of ASPP1 and ASPP2 with the p53 protein family and the apoptotic promoters PUMA and Bax

The apoptosis stimulating p53 proteins, ASPP1 and ASPP2, are the first two common activators of the p53 protein family that selectively enable the latter to regulate specific apoptotic target genes, which facilitates yes yet unknown mechanisms for discrimination between cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. To better understand the interplay between ASPP- and p53-family of proteins we investigated the molecular interactions between them using biochemical methods and structure-based homology modelling. The data demonstrate that: (i) the binding of ASPP1 and ASPP2 to p53, p63 and p73 is direct; (ii) the C-termini of ASPP1 and ASPP2 interact with the DNA-binding domains of p53 protein family with dissociation constants, K_d, in the lower micro-molar range; (iii) the stoichiometry of binding is 1:1; (iv) the DNA-binding domains of p53 family members are sufficient for these protein–protein interactions; (v) EMSA titrations revealed that while tri-complex formation between ASPPs, p53 family of proteins and PUMA/Bax is mutually exclusive, ASPP2 (but not ASPP1) formed a complex with PUMA (but not Bax) and displaced p53 and p73. The structure-based homology modelling revealed subtle differences between ASPP2 and ASPP1 and together with the experimental data provide novel mechanistic insights.