The Endoplasmic Reticulum Is a Reservoir for WAVE/SCAR Regulatory Complex Signaling in the Arabidopsis Leaf

During plant cell morphogenesis, signal transduction and cytoskeletal dynamics interact to locally organize the cytoplasm and define the geometry of cell expansion. The WAVE/SCAR (for WASP family verprolin homologous/suppressor of cyclic AMP receptor) regulatory complex (W/SRC) is an evolutionarily conserved heteromeric protein complex. Within the plant kingdom W/SRC is a broadly used effector that converts Rho-of-Plants (ROP)/Rac small GTPase signals into Actin-Related Protein2/3 and actin-dependent growth responses. Although the components and biochemistry of the W/SRC pathway are well understood, a basic understanding of how cells partition W/SRC into active and inactive pools is lacking. In this paper, we report that the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an important organelle for W/SRC regulation. We determined that a large intracellular pool of the core W/SRC subunit NAP1, like the known positive regulator of W/SRC, the DOCK family guanine nucleotide-exchange factor SPIKE1 (SPK1), localizes to the surface of the ER. The ER-associated NAP1 is inactive because it displays little colocalization with the actin network, and ER localization requires neither activating signals from SPK1 nor a physical association with its W/SRC-binding partner, SRA1. Our results indicate that in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) leaf pavement cells and trichomes, the ER is a reservoir for W/SRC signaling and may have a key role in the early steps of W/SRC assembly and/or activation.The W/SRC (for WASP family verprolin homologous/suppressor of cAMP receptor regulatory complex) and Actin-Related Protein (ARP)2/3 complex are part of an evolutionarily conserved Rho-of-Plants (ROP)/Rac small GTPase signal transduction cascade that controls actin-dependent morphogenesis in a wide variety of tissues and developmental contexts (Smith and Oppenheimer, 2005; Szymanski, 2005; Yalovsky et al., 2008). Many of the components and regulatory relationships among the complexes were discovered based on the stage-specific cell-swelling and -twisting phenotypes of the distorted class of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) trichome mutants (Szymanski et al., 1999; Zhang et al., 2005, 2008; Djakovic et al., 2006; Le et al., 2006; Uhrig et al., 2007). However, in both maize (Zea mays) and Arabidopsis, W/SRC and/or ARP2/3 are required for normal pavement cell morphogenesis (Frank and Smith, 2002; Mathur et al., 2003b; Brembu et al., 2004). Compared with other Arabidopsis pavement cell mutants, the shape defects of the distorted group are relatively mild. However, the distorted mutants and spike1 (spk1) differ from most other morphology mutants in that they display gaps in the shoot epidermis, most frequently at the interface of pavement cells and stomata (Qiu et al., 2002; Le et al., 2003; Li et al., 2003; Mathur et al., 2003b; Zhang et al., 2005; Djakovic et al., 2006). The cell gaps may reflect either uncoordinated growth between neighboring cells or defective cortical actin-dependent secretion of polysaccharides and/or proteins that promote cell-cell adhesion (Smith and Oppenheimer, 2005; Hussey et al., 2006; Leucci et al., 2007).In tip-growing cells, there is a strict requirement for actin to organize the trafficking and secretion activities of the cell to restrict growth to the apex. In Arabidopsis, the W/SRC-ARP2/3 pathway is not an essential tip growth component, because null alleles of both W/SRC and ARP2/3 subunits do not cause noticeable pollen tube or root hair phenotypes (Le et al., 2003; Djakovic et al., 2006). However, reverse genetic analysis of the W/SRC subunit BRK1 and ARP2/3 in the tip-growing protonemal cells of Physcomitrella patens revealed the obvious importance of this pathway (Harries et al., 2005; Perroud and Quatrano, 2008). Along similar lines, in two different legume species, W/SRC subunits are required for a normal root nodulation response to symbiotic bacteria (Yokota et al., 2009; Miyahara et al., 2010), indicating a conditional importance for this pathway in root hair growth. These genetic studies centered on the W/SRC and ARP2/3 pathways, in addition to those that involve a broader collection of actin-based morphology mutants (Smith and Oppenheimer, 2005; Blanchoin et al., 2010), are defining important cytoskeletal proteins and new interactions with the endomembrane system during morphogenesis. However, it is not completely clear how unstable actin filaments and actin bundle networks dictate the growth patterns of cells (Staiger et al., 2009).The difficulty of understanding the functions of specific actin arrays can be explained, in part, by the fact that plant cells that employ a diffuse growth mechanism have highly unstable cortical actin filaments and large actin bundles that do not have a geometry that obviously relates to the direction of growth or a specific subcellular activity (Blanchoin et al., 2010). This is in contrast to the cortical endocytic actin patches in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Evangelista et al., 2002; Kaksonen et al., 2003) and cortical meshworks in the lamellipodia of crawling cells (Pollard and Borisy, 2003) that reveal subcellular locations where actin works to locally control membrane dynamics. In thick-walled plant cells, the magnitude of the forces that accompany turgor-driven cell expansion exceed those that could be generated by actin polymerization by orders of magnitude (Szymanski and Cosgrove, 2009). Localized cell wall loosening or the assembly of an anisotropic cell wall generates asymmetric yielding responses to turgor-induced stress (Baskin, 2005; Cosgrove, 2005). Therefore, the actin-based control of cell boundary dynamics is indirect, and the actin cytoskeleton influences cell shape change, in part, by actin and/or myosin-dependent trafficking of hormone transporters (Geldner et al., 2001) and organelles (Prokhnevsky et al., 2008), including those that control the localized delivery of protein complexes and polysaccharides that pattern the cell wall (Leucci et al., 2007; Gutierrez et al., 2009). In this scheme for actin-based growth control, the actin network dynamically rearranges at spatial scales that span from approximately 1- to 10-µm subcellular domains that may locally position organelles (Cleary, 1995; Gibbon et al., 1999; Szymanski et al., 1999) to the more than 100-µm actin bundle networks that operate at the spatial scales of entire cells (Gutierrez et al., 2009; Dyachok et al., 2011). It is clear from the work of several laboratories that the W/SRC and ARP2/3 protein complexes are required to organize cortical actin and actin bundle networks in trichomes (Szymanski et al., 1999; Le et al., 2003; Deeks et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2005) and cylindrical epidermal cells (Mathur et al., 2003b; Dyachok et al., 2008, 2011). A key challenge now is to understand how plant cells deploy these approximately 10- to 20-nm heteromeric protein complexes to influence the patterns of growth at cellular scales.The genetic and biochemical control of ARP2/3 is complicated, but this is a tractable problem in plants, because the pathway is relatively simple compared with most other species in which it has been characterized. For example, in organisms ranging from yeast to humans, there are multiple types of ARP2/3 activators, protein complexes, and pathways that activate ARP2/3 (Welch and Mullins, 2002; Derivery and Gautreau, 2010). However, the maize and Arabidopsis genomes encode only WAVE/SCAR homologous proteins that can potently activate ARP2/3 (Frank et al., 2004; Basu et al., 2005). Detailed genetic and biochemical analyses of the WAVE/SCAR gene family in Arabidopsis demonstrated that the plant activators function interchangeably within the context of the W/SRC and define the lone pathway for ARP2/3 activation (Zhang et al., 2008). Bioinformatic analyses are consistent with a prominent role for W/SRC in the angiosperms, because in general, WASH complex subunits, which are structurally similar to WAVE/SCAR proteins, are largely absent from the higher plant genomes, while WAVE/SCAR genes are highly conserved (Kollmar et al., 2012).The components and regulatory schemes of the W/SRC-ARP2/3 pathway in Arabidopsis and P. patens are conserved compared with vertebrate species that employ these same protein complexes (Szymanski, 2005). For example, mutant complementation tests indicate that human W/SRC and ARP2/3 complex subunits can substitute for the Arabidopsis proteins (Mathur et al., 2003b). Furthermore, biochemical assays of Arabidopsis W/SRC (Basu et al., 2004; El-Assal et al., 2004; Frank et al., 2004; Le et al., 2006; Uhrig et al., 2007) and ARP2/3 assembly (Kotchoni et al., 2009) have shown that the binary interactions among W/SRC subunits and ARP2/3 complex assembly mechanisms are indistinguishable from those that have been observed for human W/SRC (Gautreau et al., 2004) and yeast ARP2/3 (Winter et al., 1999). After an initial period of controversy concerning the biochemical control of W/SRC, it is now apparent that vertebrate W/SRC (Derivery et al., 2009; Ismail et al., 2009), like the ARP2/3 complex (Machesky et al., 1999), is intrinsically inactive and requires positive regulation by Rac and other factors to fully activate ARP2/3 (Ismail et al., 2009; Lebensohn and Kirschner, 2009; Chen et al., 2010). Although overexpression of dominant negative ROP mutants causes trichome swelling and a reduced trichome branch number (Fu et al., 2002), the involvement of ROPs in trichome morphogenesis has been difficult to prove with a loss-of-function ROP allele because so many ROPs are expressed in this cell type (Marks et al., 2009). Existing reports on ROP loss-of-function mutants demonstrate the importance of pavement cell morphogenesis but do not document a trichome phenotype (Fu et al., 2005; Xu et al., 2010). A recent report describes a clever strategy to generate ROP loss-of-function lines that used the ectopic expression of ROP-specific bacterial toxins. There was a strong association between inducible expression of the toxins and the appearance of trichomes with severe trichome swelling and reduced branch number phenotypes (Singh et al., 2012). Although the exact mechanism of ROP-dependent control of W/SRC remains to be determined, the results described above in combination with the detection of direct interactions between the ROPGEF SPK1, active forms of ROP, and W/SRC subunits (Basu et al., 2004, 2008; Uhrig et al., 2007) strongly suggest that W/SRC is a ROP effector complex.The major challenge in the field now is to better understand the cellular control of W/SRC and how the complex is partitioned into active and inactive pools. In mammalian cells that crawl on a solid substrate, current models propose that a cytosolic pool of inactive WAVE/SCAR proteins and W/SRC is locally recruited and activated at specific plasma membrane surfaces in response to signals from some unknown Rac guanine nucleotide-exchange factor (GEF), protein kinase, and/or lipid kinase (Oikawa et al., 2004; Lebensohn and Kirschner, 2009; Chen et al., 2010). However, in Drosophila melanogaster neurons (Bogdan and Klämbt, 2003) and cultured human melanoma cells (Steffen et al., 2004), there are large pools of W/SRC with a perinuclear or organelle-like punctate localization that has no obvious relationship to cell shape or motility, raising uncertainty about the cellular mechanisms of W/SRC activation and the importance of different subcellular pools of the complex.In plants, cell fractionation experiments indicate that SCAR1 and ARP2/3 have an increased association with membranes compared with their animal counterparts (Dyachok et al., 2008; Kotchoni et al., 2009). In tip-growing moss protonemal cells, both the W/SRC subunit BRK1 and ARP2/3 localize to a population of unidentified organelles within the apical zone (Perroud and Quatrano, 2008). Similar live-cell imaging experiments in Arabidopsis reported a plasma membrane localization for SCAR1 and BRK1 in a variety of shoot epidermal and root cortex, and their accumulation at young trichome branch tips and at three-way cell wall junctions may define subcellular domains for W/SRC-ARP2/3-dependent actin filament nucleation at the plasma membrane (Dyachok et al., 2008). However, to our knowledge, active W/SRC, defined here as the fraction of W/SRC that colocalizes with ARP2/3 or actin, has not been reported in plants, and the plasma membrane is not necessarily the only organelle involved in W/SRC regulation. For example, the reported accumulation of BRK1 and SCAR1 at three-way cell wall junctions has a punctate appearance at the cell cortex that may not simply correspond to the plasma membrane (Dyachok et al., 2008). Also, in young stage 4 trichomes, there was an uncharacterized pool of intracellular SCAR1, but not BRK1, that localized to relatively large punctate structures (Dyachok et al., 2008). The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) may also be involved in W/SRC regulation. The ER-localized DOCK family ROPGEF SPK1 (Zhang et al., 2010) physically associates with multiple W/SRC proteins (Uhrig et al., 2007; Basu et al., 2008) and, based on genetic criteria, is an upstream, positive regulator of the W/SRC-ARP2/3 pathway (Basu et al., 2008). In the leaf, one function of SPK1 is to promote normal trafficking between the ER and Golgi; however, arp2/3 mutants do not share ER-stress phenotypes with spk1 (Zhang et al., 2010), making it unclear if SPK1 and the ER are directly involved in W/SRC signaling.This paper focuses on the localization and control of the W/SRC subunit NAP1/GNARLED/NAPP/HEM1/2. Arabidopsis NAP1 directly interacts with the ROP/Rac effector subunit SRA1/PIROGI/KLUNKER/PIRP (Basu et al., 2004; El-Assal et al., 2004; Uhrig et al., 2007). Based on the equally severe syndrome of nap1 and arp2/3 null phenotypes, and double mutant analyses, the only known function of NAP1 is to positively regulate ARP2/3 (Brembu et al., 2004; Deeks et al., 2004; El-Din El-Assal et al., 2004; Li et al., 2004). The vertebrate SRA1-NAP1 dimer is important for W/SRC assembly (Gautreau et al., 2004) and forms an extended physical surface that trans-inhibits the C-terminal ARP2/3-activating domain of WAVE/SCAR (Chen et al., 2010). The plant NAP1 and SRA1 proteins share end-to-end amino acid conservation with their vertebrate homologs and may form a heterodimer with similar functions (Basu et al., 2004; El-Assal et al., 2004; Uhrig et al., 2007). We report here that Arabidopsis NAP1 is strongly associated with ER membranes. In a detailed series of localization experiments, we detect a complicated intracellular distribution of NAP1 among the ER, the nucleus, and unidentified submicrometer punctae. A large pool of ER-associated NAP1 is inactive, based on the low level of colocalization with actin.Its accumulation on the ER does not require activating signals from either SPK1 or SRA1. These data indicate that the ER is a reservoir for W/SRC signaling and suggest that early steps in the positive regulation of NAP1 and the W/SRC occur on the ER surface.     

Focus Issue on Calcium Signaling: Recent Advances in Calcium/Calmodulin-Mediated Signaling with an Emphasis on Plant-Microbe Interactions

Calcium/calmodulin-mediated signaling contributes in diverse roles in plant growth, development, and response to environmental stimuli.During calcium (Ca2+) signaling, decoding the stimulus-response coupling involves a set of Ca2+ sensor proteins or Ca2+-binding proteins (DeFalco et al., 2010a; Kudla et al., 2010). These proteins usually possess one or more classical helix-loop-helix elongation factor (EF) hand motifs. Three major types of Ca2+-sensor proteins in plants are calmodulin (CaM)/CaM-like proteins, calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), and calcineurin B-like proteins. As compared with animals, plant genomes encode more diversified Ca2+ sensors; with the exception of canonic CaM, all other types of Ca2+ sensors (CaM-like proteins, CDPKs, and calcineurin B-like proteins) are plant specific. The large population and unique structural composition of Ca2+-binding proteins and the diversity of the target proteins regulated by the Ca2+ sensors reflect the complexity of Ca2+ signaling, which helps plants adapt to the changing environment. This update will be limited primarily to discussions on CaM and CaM-binding proteins and the recent advances in Ca2+/CaM-mediated signaling.CaM is a conserved Ca2+-binding protein found in all eukaryotes. The discovery of CaM can be traced back to the 1970s. An activator of cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase was shown to be involved in the regulation of cAMP concentration, which was stimulated by Ca2+ (Kakiuchi and Yamazaki, 1970; Cheung, 1971). The activator was found to bind Ca2+ and was eventually named “calmodulin,” an abbreviation of Ca2+-modulated protein. Since its discovery over 40 years ago, CaM has been regarded as a model Ca2+-binding protein and has been subjected to intensive studies in biochemistry, cell biology, and molecular biology because of its importance in almost all aspects of cellular regulation (Poovaiah and Reddy, 1987, 1993; Bouche et al., 2005; DeFalco et al., 2010a; Du et al., 2011; Reddy et al., 2011b). Disruption or depletion of the single copy of the CaM gene in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) results in a recessive lethal mutation (Davis et al., 1986), suggesting that CaM has a critical role in eukaryotic cells.The structure of CaM has been well studied, and the prototype of CaM found in all eukaryotes has 149 amino acids with two globular domains, each containing two EF hands connected by a long flexible helix (Meador et al., 1993; Zhang et al., 1995; Yun et al., 2004; Ishida et al., 2009). As more and more genomes are sequenced, it is becoming clear that CaM belongs to a small gene family in plants. In the model plant Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), seven CaM genes encode for four highly conserved isoforms (CaM1/4, CaM2/3/5, CaM6, and CaM7) that differ in only one to five amino acid residues. Loss-of-function mutations of individual CaMs indicate that the different CaMs may have overlapping yet different functions. For example, a loss of function in Arabidopsis AtCaM2 affects pollen germination (Landoni et al., 2010). Phenotypic analysis showed that in normal growth conditions, atcam2-2 plants were indistinguishable from the wild type, while genetic analysis showed a reduced transmission of the atcam2-2 allele through the male gametophyte, and in vitro pollen germination revealed a reduced level of germination in comparison with the wild type. However, the atcam3 knockout mutant showed a clear reduction in thermotolerance after heat treatment at 45°C for 50 min (Zhang et al., 2009). Overexpression of AtCaM3 in either the atcam3 knockout or wild-type background significantly rescued or increased the thermotolerance, respectively. Further analysis of individual CaM mutants under different stress conditions should reveal more on the functional significance of individual CaM genes.     

Spore Density Determines Infection Strategy by the Plant Pathogenic Fungus Plectosphaerella cucumerina

Necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens are resisted by different plant defenses. While necrotrophic pathogens are sensitive to jasmonic acid (JA)-dependent resistance, biotrophic pathogens are resisted by salicylic acid (SA)- and reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent resistance. Although many pathogens switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy during infection, little is known about the signals triggering this transition. This study is based on the observation that the early colonization pattern and symptom development by the ascomycete pathogen Plectosphaerella cucumerina (P. cucumerina) vary between inoculation methods. Using the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) defense response as a proxy for infection strategy, we examined whether P. cucumerina alternates between hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic lifestyles, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf surface. Untargeted metabolome analysis revealed profound differences in metabolic defense signatures upon different inoculation methods. Quantification of JA and SA, marker gene expression, and cell death confirmed that infection from high spore densities activates JA-dependent defenses with excessive cell death, while infection from low spore densities induces SA-dependent defenses with lower levels of cell death. Phenotyping of Arabidopsis mutants in JA, SA, and ROS signaling confirmed that P. cucumerina is differentially resisted by JA- and SA/ROS-dependent defenses, depending on initial spore density and distribution on the leaf. Furthermore, in situ staining for early callose deposition at the infection sites revealed that necrotrophy by P. cucumerina is associated with elevated host defense. We conclude that P. cucumerina adapts to early-acting plant defenses by switching from a hemibiotrophic to a necrotrophic infection program, thereby gaining an advantage of immunity-related cell death in the host.Plant pathogens are often classified as necrotrophic or biotrophic, depending on their infection strategy (Glazebrook, 2005; Nishimura and Dangl, 2010). Necrotrophic pathogens kill living host cells and use the decayed plant tissue as a substrate to colonize the plant, whereas biotrophic pathogens parasitize living plant cells by employing effector molecules that suppress the host immune system (Pel and Pieterse, 2013). Despite this binary classification, the majority of pathogenic microbes employ a hemibiotrophic infection strategy, which is characterized by an initial biotrophic phase followed by a necrotrophic infection strategy at later stages of infection (Perfect and Green, 2001). The pathogenic fungi Magnaporthe grisea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the oomycete Phytophthora infestans, and the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are examples of hemibiotrophic plant pathogens (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011; van Kan et al., 2014; Kabbage et al., 2015).Despite considerable progress in our understanding of plant resistance to necrotrophic and biotrophic pathogens (Glazebrook, 2005; Mengiste, 2012; Lai and Mengiste, 2013), recent debate highlights the dynamic and complex interplay between plant-pathogenic microbes and their hosts, which is raising concerns about the use of infection strategies as a static tool to classify plant pathogens. For instance, the fungal genus Botrytis is often labeled as an archetypal necrotroph, even though there is evidence that it can behave as an endophytic fungus with a biotrophic lifestyle (van Kan et al., 2014). The rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, which is often classified as a hemibiotrophic leaf pathogen (Perfect and Green, 2001; Koeck et al., 2011), can adopt a purely biotrophic lifestyle when infecting root tissues (Marcel et al., 2010). It remains unclear which signals are responsible for the switch from biotrophy to necrotrophy and whether these signals rely solely on the physiological state of the pathogen, or whether host-derived signals play a role as well (Kabbage et al., 2015).The plant hormones salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) play a central role in the activation of plant defenses (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012). The first evidence that biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens are resisted by different immune responses came from Thomma et al. (1998), who demonstrated that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) genotypes impaired in SA signaling show enhanced susceptibility to the biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis (formerly known as Peronospora parastitica), while JA-insensitive genotypes were more susceptible to the necrotrophic fungus Alternaria brassicicola. In subsequent years, the differential effectiveness of SA- and JA-dependent defense mechanisms has been confirmed in different plant-pathogen interactions, while additional plant hormones, such as ethylene, abscisic acid (ABA), auxins, and cytokinins, have emerged as regulators of SA- and JA-dependent defenses (Bari and Jones, 2009; Cao et al., 2011; Pieterse et al., 2012). Moreover, SA- and JA-dependent defense pathways have been shown to act antagonistically on each other, which allows plants to prioritize an appropriate defense response to attack by biotrophic pathogens, necrotrophic pathogens, or herbivores (Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Verhage et al., 2010).In addition to plant hormones, reactive oxygen species (ROS) play an important regulatory role in plant defenses (Torres et al., 2006; Lehmann et al., 2015). Within minutes after the perception of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, NADPH oxidases and apoplastic peroxidases generate early ROS bursts (Torres et al., 2002; Daudi et al., 2012; O’Brien et al., 2012), which activate downstream defense signaling cascades (Apel and Hirt, 2004; Torres et al., 2006; Miller et al., 2009; Mittler et al., 2011; Lehmann et al., 2015). ROS play an important regulatory role in the deposition of callose (Luna et al., 2011; Pastor et al., 2013) and can also stimulate SA-dependent defenses (Chaouch et al., 2010; Yun and Chen, 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mammarella et al., 2015). However, the spread of SA-induced apoptosis during hyperstimulation of the plant immune system is contained by the ROS-generating NADPH oxidase RBOHD (Torres et al., 2005), presumably to allow for the sufficient generation of SA-dependent defense signals from living cells that are adjacent to apoptotic cells. Nitric oxide (NO) plays an additional role in the regulation of SA/ROS-dependent defense (Trapet et al., 2015). This gaseous molecule can stimulate ROS production and cell death in the absence of SA while preventing excessive ROS production at high cellular SA levels via S-nitrosylation of RBOHD (Yun et al., 2011). Recently, it was shown that pathogen-induced accumulation of NO and ROS promotes the production of azelaic acid, a lipid derivative that primes distal plants for SA-dependent defenses (Wang et al., 2014). Hence, NO, ROS, and SA are intertwined in a complex regulatory network to mount local and systemic resistance against biotrophic pathogens. Interestingly, pathogens with a necrotrophic lifestyle can benefit from ROS/SA-dependent defenses and associated cell death (Govrin and Levine, 2000). For instance, Kabbage et al. (2013) demonstrated that S. sclerotiorum utilizes oxalic acid to repress oxidative defense signaling during initial biotrophic colonization, but it stimulates apoptosis at later stages to advance necrotrophic colonization. Moreover, SA-induced repression of JA-dependent resistance not only benefits necrotrophic pathogens but also hemibiotrophic pathogens after having switched from biotrophy to necrotrophy (Glazebrook, 2005; Pieterse et al., 2009, 2012).Plectosphaerella cucumerina ((P. cucumerina, anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) anamorph Plectosporum tabacinum) is a filamentous ascomycete fungus that can survive saprophytically in soil by decomposing plant material (Palm et al., 1995). The fungus can cause sudden death and blight disease in a variety of crops (Chen et al., 1999; Harrington et al., 2000). Because P. cucumerina can infect Arabidopsis leaves, the P. cucumerina-Arabidopsis interaction has emerged as a popular model system in which to study plant defense reactions to necrotrophic fungi (Berrocal-Lobo et al., 2002; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Carlucci et al., 2012; Ramos et al., 2013). Various studies have shown that Arabidopsis deploys a wide range of inducible defense strategies against P. cucumerina, including JA-, SA-, ABA-, and auxin-dependent defenses, glucosinolates (Tierens et al., 2001; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014), callose deposition (García-Andrade et al., 2011; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012), and ROS (Tierens et al., 2002; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Barna et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2012, 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Recent metabolomics studies have revealed large-scale metabolic changes in P. cucumerina-infected Arabidopsis, presumably to mobilize chemical defenses (Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2010; Gamir et al., 2014; Pastor et al., 2014). Furthermore, various chemical agents have been reported to induce resistance against P. cucumerina. These chemicals include β-amino-butyric acid, which primes callose deposition and SA-dependent defenses, benzothiadiazole (BTH or Bion; Görlach et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), which activates SA-related defenses (Lawton et al., 1996; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Gamir et al., 2014; Luna et al., 2014), JA (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004), and ABA, which primes ROS and callose deposition (Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Pastor et al., 2013). However, among all these studies, there is increasing controversy about the exact signaling pathways and defense responses contributing to plant resistance against P. cucumerina. While it is clear that JA and ethylene contribute to basal resistance against the fungus, the exact roles of SA, ABA, and ROS in P. cucumerina resistance vary between studies (Thomma et al., 1998; Ton and Mauch-Mani, 2004; Sánchez-Vallet et al., 2012; Gamir et al., 2014).This study is based on the observation that the disease phenotype during P. cucumerina infection differs according to the inoculation method used. We provide evidence that the fungus follows a hemibiotrophic infection strategy when infecting from relatively low spore densities on the leaf surface. By contrast, when challenged by localized host defense to relatively high spore densities, the fungus switches to a necrotrophic infection program. Our study has uncovered a novel strategy by which plant-pathogenic fungi can take advantage of the early immune response in the host plant.     

S-Nitrosylation of Ascorbate Peroxidase Is Part of Programmed Cell Death Signaling in Tobacco Bright Yellow-2 Cells

Nitric oxide (NO) is a small redox molecule that acts as a signal in different physiological and stress-related processes in plants. Recent evidence suggests that the biological activity of NO is also mediated by S-nitrosylation, a well-known redox-based posttranslational protein modification. Here, we show that during programmed cell death (PCD), induced by both heat shock (HS) or hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Bright Yellow-2 cells, an increase in S-nitrosylating agents occurred. NO increased in both experimentally induced PCDs, although with different intensities. In H₂O₂-treated cells, the increase in NO was lower than in cells exposed to HS. However, a simultaneous increase in S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), another NO source for S-nitrosylation, occurred in H₂O₂-treated cells, while a decrease in this metabolite was evident after HS. Consistently, different levels of activity and expression of GSNO reductase, the enzyme responsible for GSNO removal, were found in cells subjected to the two different PCD-inducing stimuli: low in H₂O₂-treated cells and high in the heat-shocked ones. Irrespective of the type of S-nitrosylating agent, S-nitrosylated proteins formed upon exposure to both of the PCD-inducing stimuli. Interestingly, cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX), a key enzyme controlling H₂O₂ levels in plants, was found to be S-nitrosylated at the onset of both PCDs. In vivo and in vitro experiments showed that S-nitrosylation of cAPX was responsible for the rapid decrease in its activity. The possibility that S-nitrosylation induces cAPX ubiquitination and degradation and acts as part of the signaling pathway leading to PCD is discussed.Nitric oxide (NO) is a gaseous and diffusible redox molecule that acts as a signaling compound in both animal and plant systems (Pacher et al., 2007; Besson-Bard et al., 2008). In plants, NO has been found to play a key role in several physiological processes, such as germination, lateral root development, flowering, senescence, stomatal closure, and growth of pollen tubes (Beligni and Lamattina, 2000; Neill et al., 2002; Correa-Aragunde et al., 2004; He et al., 2004; Prado et al., 2004; Carimi et al., 2005). In addition, NO has been reported to be involved in plant responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses (Leitner et al., 2009; Siddiqui et al., 2011) and in the signaling pathways leading to programmed cell death (PCD; Delledonne et al., 1998; de Pinto et al., 2006; De Michele et al., 2009; Lin et al., 2012; Serrano et al., 2012).The cellular environment may greatly influence the chemical reactivity of NO, giving rise to different biologically active NO-derived compounds, collectively named reactive nitrogen species, which amplify and differentiate its ability to activate physiological and stress-related processes. Many of the biological properties of NO are due to its high affinity with transition metals of metalloproteins as well as its reactivity with reactive oxygen species (ROS; Hill et al., 2010). However, recent evidence suggests that protein S-nitrosylation, due to the addition of NO to reactive Cys thiols, may act as a key mechanism of NO signaling in plants (Wang et al., 2006; Astier et al., 2011). NO is also able to react with reduced glutathione (GSH), the most abundant cellular thiol, thus producing S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), which also acts as an endogenous trans-nitrosylating agent. GSNO is also considered as a NO store and donor and, as it is more stable than NO, acts as a long-distance NO transporter through the floematic flux (Malik et al., 2011). S-Nitrosoglutathione reductase (GSNOR), which is an enzyme conserved from bacteria to humans, has been suggested to play a role in regulating S-nitrosothiols (SNO) and the turnover of S-nitrosylated proteins in plants (Liu et al., 2001; Rusterucci et al., 2007).A number of proteins involved in metabolism, stress responses, and redox homeostasis have been identified as potential targets for S-nitrosylation in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Lindermayr et al., 2005). During the hypersensitive response (HR), 16 proteins were identified to be S-nitrosylated in the seedlings of the same species (Romero-Puertas et al., 2008); in Citrus species, S-nitrosylation of about 50 proteins occurred in the NO-mediated resistance to high salinity (Tanou et al., 2009).However, while the number of candidate proteins for S-nitrosylation is increasing, the functional significance of protein S-nitrosylation has been explained only in a few cases, such as for nonsymbiotic hemoglobin (Perazzolli et al., 2004), glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Lindermayr et al., 2005; Wawer et al., 2010), Met adenosyltransferase (Lindermayr et al., 2006), and metacaspase9 (Belenghi et al., 2007). Of particular interest are the cases in which S-nitrosylation involves enzymes controlling ROS homeostasis. For instance, it has been reported that S-nitrosylation of peroxiredoxin IIE regulates the antioxidant function of this enzyme and might contribute to the HR (Romero-Puertas et al., 2007). It has also been shown that in the immunity response, S-nitrosylation of NADPH oxidase inactivates the enzyme, thus reducing ROS production and controlling HR development (Yun et al., 2011).Recently, S-nitrosylation has also been shown to be involved in PCD of nitric oxide excess1 (noe1) rice (Oryza sativa) plants, which are mutated in the OsCATC gene coding for catalase (Lin et al., 2012). In these plants, which show PCD-like phenotypes under high-light conditions, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and thioredoxin are S-nitrosylated. This suggests that the NO-dependent regulation of these proteins is involved in plant PCD, similar to what occurs in animal apoptosis (Sumbayev, 2003; Hara et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2012). The increase in hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) after exposure to high light in noe1 plants is responsible for the production of NO required for leaf cell death induction (Lin et al., 2012). There is a strict relationship between H₂O₂ and NO in PCD activation (Delledonne et al., 2001; de Pinto et al., 2002); however, the mechanism of this interplay is largely still unknown (for review, see Zaninotto et al., 2006; Zhao, 2007; Yoshioka et al., 2011). NO can induce ROS production and vice versa, and their reciprocal modulation in terms of intensity and timing seems to be crucial in determining PCD activation and in controlling HR development (Delledonne et al., 2001; Zhao, 2007; Yun et al., 2011).In previous papers, we demonstrated that heat shock (HS) at 55°C and treatment with 50 mm H₂O₂ promote PCD in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Bright Yellow-2 (BY-2) cells (Vacca et al., 2004; de Pinto et al., 2006; Locato et al., 2008). In both experimental conditions, NO production and decrease in cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase (cAPX) were observed as early events in the PCD pathway, and cAPX decrease has been suggested to contribute to determining the redox environment required for PCD (de Pinto et al., 2006; Locato et al., 2008).In this study, the production of nitrosylating agents (NO and GSNO) in the first hours of PCD induction by HS or H₂O₂ treatment in tobacco BY-2 cells and their role in PCD were studied. The possibility that S-nitrosylation could be a first step in regulating cAPX activity and turnover as part of the signaling pathway leading to PCD was also investigated.     

Evolution of Conifer Diterpene Synthases: Diterpene Resin Acid Biosynthesis in Lodgepole Pine and Jack Pine Involves Monofunctional and Bifunctional Diterpene Synthases

Abscisic acid (ABA) induces stomatal closure and inhibits light-induced stomatal opening. The mechanisms in these two processes are not necessarily the same. It has been postulated that the ABA receptors involved in opening inhibition are different from those involved in closure induction. Here, we provide evidence that four recently identified ABA receptors (PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE1 [PYR1], PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE-LIKE1 [PYL1], PYL2, and PYL4) are not sufficient for opening inhibition in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). ABA-induced stomatal closure was impaired in the pyr1/pyl1/pyl2/pyl4 quadruple ABA receptor mutant. ABA inhibition of the opening of the mutant’s stomata remained intact. ABA did not induce either the production of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide or the alkalization of the cytosol in the quadruple mutant, in accordance with the closure phenotype. Whole cell patch-clamp analysis of inward-rectifying K⁺ current in guard cells showed a partial inhibition by ABA, indicating that the ABA sensitivity of the mutant was not fully impaired. ABA substantially inhibited blue light-induced phosphorylation of H⁺-ATPase in guard cells in both the mutant and the wild type. On the other hand, in a knockout mutant of the SNF1-related protein kinase, srk2e, stomatal opening and closure, reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide production, cytosolic alkalization, inward-rectifying K⁺ current inactivation, and H⁺-ATPase phosphorylation were not sensitive to ABA.The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA), which is synthesized in response to abiotic stresses, plays a key role in the drought hardiness of plants. Reducing transpirational water loss through stomatal pores is a major ABA response (Schroeder et al., 2001). ABA promotes the closure of open stomata and inhibits the opening of closed stomata. These effects are not simply the reverse of one another (Allen et al., 1999; Wang et al., 2001; Mishra et al., 2006).A class of receptors of ABA was identified (Ma et al., 2009; Park et al., 2009; Santiago et al., 2009; Nishimura et al., 2010). The sensitivity of stomata to ABA was strongly decreased in quadruple and sextuple mutants of the ABA receptor genes PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE/PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE-LIKE/REGULATORY COMPONENT OF ABSCISIC ACID RECEPTOR (PYR/PYL/RCAR; Nishimura et al., 2010; Gonzalez-Guzman et al., 2012). The PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors are involved in the early ABA signaling events, in which a sequence of interactions of the receptors with PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2Cs (PP2Cs) and subfamily 2 SNF1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASES (SnRK2s) leads to the activation of downstream ABA signaling targets in guard cells (Cutler et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2010; Weiner et al., 2010). Studies of Commelina communis and Vicia faba suggested that the ABA receptors involved in stomatal opening are not the same as the ABA receptors involved in stomatal closure (Allan et al., 1994; Anderson et al., 1994; Assmann, 1994; Schwartz et al., 1994). The roles of PYR/PYL/RCAR in either stomatal opening or closure remained to be elucidated.Blue light induces stomatal opening through the activation of plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase in guard cells that generates an inside-negative electrochemical gradient across the plasma membrane and drives K⁺ uptake through voltage-dependent inward-rectifying K⁺ channels (Assmann et al., 1985; Shimazaki et al., 1986; Blatt, 1987; Schroeder et al., 1987; Thiel et al., 1992). Phosphorylation of the penultimate Thr of the plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase is a prerequisite for blue light-induced activation of the H⁺-ATPase (Kinoshita and Shimazaki, 1999, 2002). ABA inhibits H⁺-ATPase activity through dephosphorylation of the penultimate Thr in the C terminus of the H⁺-ATPase in guard cells, resulting in prevention of the opening (Goh et al., 1996; Zhang et al., 2004; Hayashi et al., 2011). Inward-rectifying K⁺ currents (I_Kin) of guard cells are negatively regulated by ABA in addition to through the decline of the H⁺ pump-driven membrane potential difference (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; Blatt, 1990; McAinsh et al., 1990; Schwartz et al., 1994; Grabov and Blatt, 1999; Saito et al., 2008). This down-regulation of ion transporters by ABA is essential for the inhibition of stomatal opening.A series of second messengers has been shown to mediate ABA-induced stomatal closure. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by NADPH oxidases play a crucial role in ABA signaling in guard cells (Pei et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2001; Kwak et al., 2003; Sirichandra et al., 2009; Jannat et al., 2011). Nitric oxide (NO) is an essential signaling component in ABA-induced stomatal closure (Desikan et al., 2002; Guo et al., 2003; Garcia-Mata and Lamattina, 2007; Neill et al., 2008). Alkalization of cytosolic pH in guard cells is postulated to mediate ABA-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and Pisum sativum and Paphiopedilum species (Irving et al., 1992; Gehring et al., 1997; Grabov and Blatt, 1997; Suhita et al., 2004; Gonugunta et al., 2008). These second messengers transduce environmental signals to ion channels and ion transporters that create the driving force for stomatal movements (Ward et al., 1995; MacRobbie, 1998; Garcia-Mata et al., 2003).In this study, we examined the mobilization of second messengers, the inactivation of I_Kin, and the suppression of H⁺-ATPase phosphorylation evoked by ABA in Arabidopsis mutants to clarify the downstream signaling events of ABA signaling in guard cells. The mutants included a quadruple mutant of PYR/PYL/RCARs, pyr1/pyl1/pyl2/pyl4, and a mutant of a SnRK2 kinase, srk2e.     

Rhamnolipids Elicit Defense Responses and Induce Disease Resistance against Biotrophic, Hemibiotrophic, and Necrotrophic Pathogens That Require Different Signaling Pathways in Arabidopsis and Highlight a Central Role for Salicylic Acid

Plant resistance to phytopathogenic microorganisms mainly relies on the activation of an innate immune response usually launched after recognition by the plant cells of microbe-associated molecular patterns. The plant hormones, salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid, and ethylene have emerged as key players in the signaling networks involved in plant immunity. Rhamnolipids (RLs) are glycolipids produced by bacteria and are involved in surface motility and biofilm development. Here we report that RLs trigger an immune response in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) characterized by signaling molecules accumulation and defense gene activation. This immune response participates to resistance against the hemibiotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato, the biotrophic oomycete Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis, and the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea. We show that RL-mediated resistance involves different signaling pathways that depend on the type of pathogen. Ethylene is involved in RL-induced resistance to H. arabidopsidis and to P. syringae pv tomato whereas jasmonic acid is essential for the resistance to B. cinerea. SA participates to the restriction of all pathogens. We also show evidence that SA-dependent plant defenses are potentiated by RLs following challenge by B. cinerea or P. syringae pv tomato. These results highlight a central role for SA in RL-mediated resistance. In addition to the activation of plant defense responses, antimicrobial properties of RLs are thought to participate in the protection against the fungus and the oomycete. Our data highlight the intricate mechanisms involved in plant protection triggered by a new type of molecule that can be perceived by plant cells and that can also act directly onto pathogens.In their environment, plants are challenged by potentially pathogenic microorganisms. In response, they express a set of defense mechanisms including preformed structural and chemical barriers, as well as an innate immune response quickly activated after microorganism perception (Boller and Felix, 2009). Plant innate immunity is triggered after recognition by pattern recognition receptors of conserved pathogen- or microbe-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs or MAMPs, respectively) or by plant endogenous molecules released by pathogen invasion and called danger-associated molecular patterns (Boller and Felix, 2009; Dodds and Rathjen, 2010). This first step of recognition leads to the activation of MAMP-triggered immunity (MTI). Successful pathogens can secrete effectors that interfere or suppress MTI, resulting in effector-triggered susceptibility. A second level of perception involves the direct or indirect recognition by specific receptors of pathogen effectors leading to effector-triggered immunity (ETI; Boller and Felix, 2009; Dodds and Rathjen, 2010). Whereas MTI and ETI are thought to involve common signaling network, ETI is usually quantitatively stronger than MTI and associated with more sustained and robust immune responses (Katagiri and Tsuda, 2010; Tsuda and Katagiri, 2010).The plant hormones, salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene (ET) have emerged as key players in the signaling networks involved in MTI and ETI (Robert-Seilaniantz et al., 2007; Tsuda et al., 2009; Katagiri and Tsuda, 2010; Mersmann et al., 2010; Tsuda and Katagiri, 2010; Robert-Seilaniantz et al., 2011). Interactions between these signal molecules allow the plant to activate and/or modulate an appropriate spectrum of responses, depending on the pathogen lifestyle, necrotroph or biotroph (Glazebrook, 2005; Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008). It is assumed that JA and ET signaling pathways are important for resistance to necrotrophic fungi including Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria brassicicola (Thomma et al., 2001; Ferrari et al., 2003; Glazebrook, 2005). Infection of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) with B. cinerea causes the induction of the JA/ET responsive gene PLANT DEFENSIN1.2 (PDF1.2; Penninckx et al., 1996; Zimmerli et al., 2001). Induction of PDF1.2 by B. cinerea is blocked in ethylene-insensitive2 (ein2) and coronatine-insensitive1 (coi1) mutants that are respectively defective in ET and JA signal transduction pathways. Moreover, ein2 and coi1 plants are highly susceptible to B. cinerea infection (Thomma et al., 1998; Thomma et al., 1999). JA/ET-dependent responses do not seem to be usually induced during resistance to biotrophs, but they can be effective if they are stimulated prior to pathogen challenge (Glazebrook, 2005). Plants impaired in SA signaling are highly susceptible to biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens. Following pathogen infection, SA hydroxylase (NahG), enhanced disease susceptibility5 (eds5), or SA induction-deficient2 (sid2) plants are unable to accumulate high SA levels and they display heightened susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst), Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis, or Erysiphe orontii (Delaney et al., 1994; Lawton et al., 1995; Wildermuth et al., 2001; Nawrath et al., 2002; Vlot et al., 2009). Mutants that are insensitive to SA, such as nonexpressor of PATHOGENESIS-RELATED (PR) genes1 (npr1), have enhanced susceptibility to these pathogens (Cao et al., 1994; Glazebrook et al., 1996; Shah et al., 1997; Dong, 2004). According to some reports, plant defense against necrotrophs also involves SA. Arabidopsis plants expressing the nahG gene and infected with B. cinerea show larger lesions compared with wild-type plants (Govrin and Levine, 2002). In tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), acidic isoforms of PR3 and PR5 gene that are specifically induced by SA (Ménard et al., 2004) are up-regulated after challenge by B. cinerea (El Oirdi et al., 2010). Resistance to some necrotrophs like Fusarium graminearum involves both SA and JA signaling pathways (Makandar et al., 2010). It is assumed that SA and JA signaling can be antagonistic (Bostock, 2005; Koornneef and Pieterse, 2008; Pieterse et al., 2009; Thaler et al., 2012). In Arabidopsis, SA inhibits JA-dependent resistance against A. brassicicola or B. cinerea (Spoel et al., 2007; Koornneef et al., 2008). Recent studies demonstrated that ET modulates the NPR1-mediated antagonism between SA and JA (Leon-Reyes et al., 2009; Leon-Reyes et al., 2010a) and suppression by SA of JA-responsive gene expression is targeted at a position downstream of the JA biosynthesis pathway (Leon-Reyes et al., 2010b). Synergistic effects of SA- and JA-dependent signaling are also well documented (Schenk et al., 2000; van Wees et al., 2000; Mur et al., 2006) and induction of some defense responses after pathogen challenge requires intact JA, ET, and SA signaling pathways (Campbell et al., 2003).Isolated MAMPs trigger defense responses that also require the activation of SA, JA, and ET signaling pathways (Tsuda et al., 2009; Katagiri and Tsuda, 2010). For instance, treatment with the flagellin peptide flg22 induces many SA-related genes including SID2, EDS5, NPR1, and PR1 (Ferrari et al., 2007; Denoux et al., 2008), causes SA accumulation (Tsuda et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2009), and activates ET signaling (Bethke et al., 2009; Mersmann et al., 2010). Local application of lipopolysaccharides elevates the level of SA (Mishina and Zeier, 2007). The oomycete Pep13 peptide induces defense responses in potato (Solanum tuberosum) that require both SA and JA (Halim et al., 2009). Although signaling networks induced by isolated MAMPs are well documented, the contribution of SA, JA, and ET in MAMP- or PAMP-induced resistance to biotrophs and necrotrophs is poorly understood.Rhamnolipids (RLs) are glycolipids produced by various bacteria species including some Pseudomonas and Burkholderia species. They are essential for bacterial surface motility and biofilm development (Vatsa et al., 2010; Chrzanowski et al., 2012). RLs are potent stimulators of animal immunity (Vatsa et al., 2010). They have recently been shown to elicit plant defense responses and to induce resistance against B. cinerea in grapevine (Vitis vinifera; Varnier et al., 2009). They also participate to biocontrol activity of the plant beneficial bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa PNA1 against oomycetes (Perneel et al., 2008). However, the signaling pathways used by RLs to stimulate plant innate immunity are not known. To gain more insights into RL-induced MTI, we investigated RL-triggered defense responses and resistance to the necrotrophic fungus B. cinerea, the biotroph oomycete H. arabidopsidis, and the hemibiotroph bacterium Pst in Arabidopsis. Our results show that RLs trigger an innate immune response in Arabidopsis that protects the plant against these different lifestyle pathogens. We demonstrate that RL-mediated resistance involves separated signaling sectors that depend on the type of pathogen. In plants challenged by RLs, SA has a central role and participates to the restriction of the three pathogens. ET is fully involved in RL-induced resistance to the biotrophic oomycete and to the hemibiotrophic bacterium whereas JA is essential for the resistance to the necrotrophic fungus.     

Focus Issue on Calcium Signaling: Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase CPK6 Positively Functions in Induction by Yeast Elicitor of Stomatal Closure and Inhibition by Yeast Elicitor of Light-Induced Stomatal Opening in Arabidopsis

Yeast elicitor (YEL) induces stomatal closure that is mediated by a Ca²⁺-dependent signaling pathway. A Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinase, CPK6, positively regulates activation of ion channels in abscisic acid and methyl jasmonate signaling, leading to stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). YEL also inhibits light-induced stomatal opening. However, it remains unknown whether CPK6 is involved in induction by YEL of stomatal closure or in inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. In this study, we investigated the roles of CPK6 in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis. Disruption of CPK6 gene impaired induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. Activation by YEL of nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable cation channels was impaired in cpk6-2 guard cells, and transient elevations elicited by YEL in cytosolic-free Ca²⁺ concentration were suppressed in cpk6-2 and cpk6-1 guard cells. YEL activated slow anion channels in wild-type guard cells but not in cpk6-2 or cpk6-1 and inhibited inward-rectifying K⁺ channels in wild-type guard cells but not in cpk6-2 or cpk6-1. The cpk6-2 and cpk6-1 mutations inhibited YEL-induced hydrogen peroxide accumulation in guard cells and apoplast of rosette leaves but did not affect YEL-induced hydrogen peroxide production in the apoplast of rosette leaves. These results suggest that CPK6 positively functions in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis and is a convergent point of signaling pathways for stomatal closure in response to abiotic and biotic stress.Stomata, formed by pairs of guard cells, play a critical role in regulation of plant CO₂ uptake and water loss, thus critically influencing plant growth and water stress responsiveness. Guard cells respond to a variety of abiotic and biotic stimuli, such as light, drought, and pathogen attack (Israelsson et al., 2006; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Melotto et al., 2008).Elicitors derived from microbial surface mimic pathogen attack and induce stomatal closure in various plant species such as Solanum lycopersicum (Lee et al., 1999), Commelina communis (Lee et al., 1999), Hordeum vulgare (Koers et al., 2011), and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Melotto et al., 2006; Khokon et al., 2010). Yeast elicitor (YEL) induces stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Klüsener et al., 2002; Khokon et al., 2010; Salam et al., 2013). Our recent studies showed that YEL inhibits light-induced stomatal opening and that protein phosphorylation is involved in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening (Salam et al., 2013).Cytosolic Ca²⁺ has long been recognized as a conserved second messenger in stomatal movement (Shimazaki et al., 2007; Roelfsema and Hedrich 2010; Hubbard et al., 2012). Elevation of cytosolic free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca2+]_cyt) is triggered by influx of Ca²⁺ from apoplast and release of Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores in guard cell signaling (Leckie et al., 1998; Hamilton et al., 2000; Pei et al., 2000; Garcia-Mata et al., 2003; Lemtiri-Chlieh et al., 2003). The influx of Ca²⁺ is carried by nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable cation (I_Ca) channels that are activated by plasma membrane hyperpolarization and H₂O₂ (Pei et al., 2000; Murata et al., 2001; Kwak et al., 2003). Elevation of [Ca2+]_cyt activates slow anion (S-type) channels and down-regulates inward-rectifying potassium (K_in) channels in guard cells (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; Grabov and Blatt, 1999). The activation of S-type channels is a hallmark of stomatal closure, and the suppression of K_in channels is favorable to stomatal closure but not to stomatal opening (Pei et al., 1997; Kwak et al., 2001; Xue et al., 2011; Uraji et al., 2012).YEL induces stomatal closure with extracellular H₂O₂ production, intracellular H₂O₂ accumulation, activation of I_Ca channels, and transient [Ca2+]_cyt elevations (Klüsener et al., 2002; Khokon et al., 2010). However, it remains to be clarified whether YEL activates S-type channels and inhibits K_in channels in guard cells.Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) are regulators in Ca²⁺-dependent guard cell signaling (Mori et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2007; Geiger et al., 2010, 2011; Zou et al., 2010; Munemasa et al., 2011; Brandt et al., 2012; Scherzer et al., 2012). In guard cells, CDPKs regulate activation of S-type and I_Ca channels and inhibition of K_in channels (Mori et al., 2006; Zou et al., 2010; Munemasa et al., 2011). A CDPK, CPK6, positively regulates activation of S-type channels and I_Ca channels without affecting H₂O₂ production in abscisic acid (ABA)- and methyl jasmonate (MeJA)-induced stomatal closure (Mori et al., 2006; Munemasa et al., 2011). CPK6 phosphorylates and activates SLOW ANION CHANNEL-ASSOCIATED1 expressed in Xenopus spp. oocyte (Brandt et al., 2012; Scherzer et al., 2012). These findings underline the role of CPK6 in regulation of ion channel activation and stomatal movement, leading us to test whether CPK6 regulates the induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening.In this study, we investigated activation of S-type channels and inhibition of K_in channels by YEL and roles of CPK6 in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. For this purpose, we examined the effects of mutation of CPK6 on induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening, activation of I_Ca channels, transient [Ca2+]_cyt elevations, activation of S-type channels, inhibition of K_in channels, H₂O₂ production in leaves, and H₂O₂ accumulation in leaves and guard cells.