Setup accuracy and dose attenuation of a wooden immobilization system for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

BackgroundWe evaluated the setup error and dose absorption of an immobilization system with a shell and wooden baseplate (SW) for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).Materials and methodsSetup errors in 109 patients immobilized with an SW or BodyFix system (BF) were compared. Dose attenuation rates of materials for baseplates were measured with an ion-chamber. Ionization measurements were performed from 90° to 180° gantry angle in 10° increments, with the ball water equivalent phantom placed at the center of the wood and carbon baseplates whose effects on dose distribution were compared using an electron portal imaging device.ResultsThe ratio for the anterior-posterior, cranial-caudal, and right-left of the cases within 3-mm registered shifts in interfractional setup error were 90.9%, 89.2%, and 97.4% for the SW, and 93.2%, 91.6%, and 98.0% for the BF, respectively. For intrafractional setup error, 98.3%, 97.4%, and 99.1% for the SW and 96.6%, 95.8%, and 98.7% for the BF were within 3-mm registered shifts, respectively. In the center position, the average (minimum/maximum) dose attenuation rates from 90° to 180° for the wooden and carbon baseplates were 0.5 (0.1/2.8)% and 1.0 (–0.1/10.1)% with 6 MV, respectively. The gamma passing rates of 2%/2 mm for the wooden and carbon baseplates were 99.7% and 98.3% (p < 0.01).ConclusionsThe immobilization system with an SW is effective for lung SBRT since it is comparable to the BF in setup accuracy. Moreover, the wooden baseplate had lower radiation attenuation rates and affected the dose distribution less than the carbon baseplate.     

Measuring the dose in bone for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy

PurposeCurrent quality assurance of radiotherapy involving bony regions generally utilises homogeneous phantoms and dose calculations, ignoring the challenges of heterogeneities with dosimetry problems likely occurring around bone. Anthropomorphic phantoms with synthetic bony materials enable realistic end-to-end testing in clinical scenarios. This work reports on measurements and calculated corrections required to directly report dose in bony materials in the context of comprehensive end-to-end dosimetry audit measurements (63 plans, 6 planning systems).Materials and methodsRadiochromic film and microDiamond measurements were performed in an anthropomorphic spine phantom containing bone equivalent materials. Medium dependent correction factors, k_med, were established using 6 MV and 10 MV Linear Accelerator Monte Carlo simulations to account for the detectors being calibrated in water, but measuring in regions of bony material. Both cortical and trabecular bony material were investigated for verification of dose calculations in dose-to-medium (D_m,m) and dose-to-water (D_w,w) scenarios.ResultsFor D_m,m calculations, modelled correction factors for cortical and trabecular bone in film measurements, and for trabecular bone in microDiamond measurements were 0.875(±0.1%), 0.953(±0.3%) and 0.962(±0.4%), respectively. For D_w,w calculations, the corrections were 0.920(±0.1%), 0.982(±0.3%) and 0.993(±0.4%), respectively. In the audit, application of the correction factors improves the mean agreement between treatment plans and measured microDiamond dose from −2.4%(±3.9%) to 0.4%(±3.7%).ConclusionMonte Carlo simulations provide a method for correcting the dose measured in bony materials allowing more accurate comparison with treatment planning system doses. In verification measurements, algorithm specific correction factors should be applied to account for variations in bony material for calculations based on D_m,m and D_w,w.     

The impact of respiratory gating on lung dosimetry in stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impacts of respiratory gating and different gating windows (GWs) on lung dosimetry in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer.Gated SBRT plans were developed using the four-dimensional computed tomography data from 17 lung cancer patients treated with SBRT. Using amplitude-based end-exhalation gating, we established 2 fixed GWs with approximate duty cycles of 50% (50% GW) and 25% (25% GW), respectively, for this study.For highly mobile tumors (3D mobility > 10 mm), additional benefits in lung-dose reductions were achieved with the 25% GW, as a result of inadequate mobility and planning target volume reductions obtained with the 50% GW. In these tumors, the absolute differences compared to the non-gated and 50% gated plans, were 0.5 Gy and 0.33 Gy for the mean lung dose and 1.11% and 0.71% for the V20, respectively. Dosimetric benefits were achieved with the 50% GW, compared with the non-gated plan, for tumors with both low mobility and small volume (gross tumor volume ≤ 10 cc). Among the identified predictive factors of dosimetric benefits, the lateral distance from midspinal canal and the motion range in anterior–posterior direction might be stronger factors because of their correlations with many of the lung-dose parameters and greater predictive capacity.The results of the present study might facilitate the selection of appropriate patients and the optimal GW according to the tumor characteristics for gated lung SBRT.     

Serious gastric perforation after second stereotactic body radiotherapy for peripheral lung cancer that recurred after initial stereotactic body radiotherapy: a case report

Background

In recent reports, re-irradiation with stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors in patients previously treated with thoracic radiation therapy resulted in several serious toxicities. Serious non-lung toxicities were observed mostly in patients with central tumors, but we experienced a case of fatal gastric perforation after a second stereotactic body radiotherapy in a patient with a peripheral lung tumor.

Case presentation

An 83-year-old Asian man was diagnosed with T2N0M0 lung cancer in the form of squamous cell carcinoma in the lower lobe of his left lung. He was treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy of 40 Gy in 4 fractions and the tumor decreased in size in partial response. The local tumor recurred 8 months after the first stereotactic body radiotherapy, and he was re-irradiated with a second stereotactic body radiotherapy of 50 Gy in 4 fractions. A Sengstaken–Blakemore tube was inserted below his diaphragm by laparoscopic surgery before the second stereotactic body radiotherapy in order to reduce the stomach dose by keeping his stomach apart from the tumor. Two months after the second stereotactic body radiotherapy, he developed fatal gastric perforation and gastropleural fistula penetrating his diaphragm.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about a gastric perforation after stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung tumors and it warns of serious complication of stereotactic body radiotherapy in not only centrally located but also peripherally located tumors like in this case.

     

Evaluation of the target dose coverage of stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer using helical tomotherapy: A dynamic phantom study

AimTo evaluate the target dose coverage for lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using helical tomotherapy (HT) with the internal tumor volume (ITV) margin settings adjusted according to the degree of tumor motion.BackgroundLung SBRT with HT may cause a dosimetric error when the target motion is large.Materials and methodsTwo lung SBRT plans were created using a tomotherapy planning station. Using these original plans, five plans with different ITV margins (4.0–20.0 mm for superior-inferior [SI] dimension) were generated. To evaluate the effects of respiratory motion on HT, an original dynamic motion phantom was developed. The respiratory wave of a healthy volunteer was used for dynamic motion as the typical tumor respiratory motion. Five patterns of motion amplitude that corresponded to five ITV margin sizes and three breathing cycles of 7, 14, and 28 breaths per minute were used. We evaluated the target dose change between a static delivery and a dynamic delivery with each motion pattern.ResultsThe target dose difference increased as the tumor size decreased and as the tumor motion increased. Although a target dose difference of <5 % was observed at ≤10 mm of tumor motion for each condition, a maximum difference of -9.94 % ± 7.10 % was observed in cases of small tumors with 20 mm of tumor motion under slow respiration.ConclusionsMinimizing respiratory movement is recommended as much as possible for lung SBRT with HT, especially for cases involving small tumors.     

Local control rates in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of lung metastases associated with the biologically effective dose

AimTo evaluate dose differences in lung metastases treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), and the correlation with local control, regarding the dose algorithm, target volume and tissue density.BackgroundSeveral studies showed excellent local control rates in SBRT for lung metastases, with different fractionation schemes depending on the tumour location or size. These results depend on the dose distributions received by the lesions in terms of the tissue heterogeneity corrections performed by the dose algorithms.Materials and methodsForty-seven lung metastases treated with SBRT, using intrafraction control and respiratory gating with internal fiducial markers as surrogates (ExacTrac, BrainLAB AG), were calculated using Pencil Beam (PB) and Monte Carlo (MC) (iPlan, BrainLAB AG).Dose differences between both algorithms were obtained for the dose received by 99% (D_99%) and 50% (D_50%) of the planning treatment volume (PTV). The biologically effective dose delivered to 99% (BED_99%) and 50% (BED_50%) of the PTV were estimated from the MC results. Local control was evaluated after 24 months of median follow-up (range: 3–52 months).ResultsThe greatest variations (40.0% in ΔD_99% and 38.4% in ΔD_50%) were found for the lower volume and density cases. The BED_99% and BED_50% were strongly correlated with observed local control rates: 100% and 61.5% for BED_99% > 85 Gy and <85 Gy (p < 0.0001), respectively, and 100% and 58.3% for BED_50% > 100 Gy and <100 Gy (p < 0.0001), respectively.ConclusionsLung metastases treated with SBRT, with delivered BED_99% > 85 Gy and BED_50% > 100 Gy, present better local control rates than those treated with lower BED values (p = 0.001).     

Monte Carlo as quality control tool of stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment plans

Purpose/objectiveThe objective of this study was to verify the accuracy of treatment plans of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and to verify the feasibility of the use of Monte Carlo (MC) as quality control (QC) on a daily basis.Material/methodsUsing EGSnrc, a MC model of Agility™ linear accelerator was created. Various measurements (Percentage depth dose (PDD), Profiles and Output factors) were done for different fields sizes from 1x1 up to 40x40 (cm²). An iterative model optimization was performed to achieve adequate parameters of MC simulation. 40 SBRT patient’s dosimetry plans were calculated by Monaco™ 3.1.1. CT images, RT-STRUCT and RT-PLAN files from Monaco™ being used as input for Moderato MC code. Finally, dose volume histogram (DVH) and paired t-tests for each contour were used for dosimetry comparison of the Monaco™ and MC.ResultsValidation of MC model was successful, as <2% difference comparing to measurements for all field’s sizes. The main energy of electron source incident on the target was 5.8 MeV, and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of Gaussian electron source were 0.09 and 0.2 (cm) in X and Y directions, respectively. For 40 treatment plan comparisons, the minimum absolute difference of mean dose of planning treatment planning (PTV) was 0.1% while the maximum was 6.3%. The minimum absolute difference of Max dose of PTV was 0.2% while the maximum was 8.1%.ConclusionSBRT treatment plans of Monaco agreed with MC results. It possible to use MC for treatment plans verifications as independent QC tool.     

Special stereotactic radiotherapy techniques: procedures and equipment for treatment simulation and dose delivery

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) is a multi-step procedure with each step requiring extreme accuracy. Physician-dependent accuracy includes appropriate disease staging, multi-disciplinary discussion with shared decision-making, choice of morphological and functional imaging methods to identify and delineate the tumor target and organs at risk, an image-guided patient set-up, active or passive management of intra-fraction movement, clinical and instrumental follow-up. Medical physicist-dependent accuracy includes use of advanced software for treatment planning and more advanced Quality Assurance procedures than required for conventional radiotherapy. Consequently, all the professionals require appropriate training in skills for high-quality SRT.Thanks to the technological advances, SRT has moved from a “frame-based” technique, i.e. the use of stereotactic coordinates which are identified by means of rigid localization frames, to the modern “frame-less” SRT which localizes the target volume directly, or by means of anatomical surrogates or fiducial markers that have previously been placed within or near the target. This review describes all the SRT steps in depth, from target simulation and delineation procedures to treatment delivery and image-guided radiation therapy. Target movement assessment and management are also described.     

Effects of metal implants and validation of four treatment planning methods used for radiotherapy dose calculation

BackgroundThe radiotherapy treatment planning process involves target delineation and dose calculation, both of which directly depend on image quality and Hounsfield unit (HU) accuracy of computed tomography (CT) images. CT images of patients having metal implants undergo image quality deterioration and show inaccurate HU values due to various artifacts. Metal artifact reduction (MAR) is used to improve the image quality. In this study, four treatment planning methods with and without MAR, in combination with actual and assigned HU values, were analyzed for dose calculation accuracy. The aim was to study the effects of metal implants on planning CT and to evaluate the dose calculation accuracy of four treatment planning methods for radiotherapy.Materials and methodsTwo phantoms with six different metal inserts were scanned in the extended HU mode, with and without MAR. Geometry verification and HU analysis of the metals and the surrounding region were carried out. Water equivalent distance (WED) measurements and dose calculation for each metal insert were done in the treatment planning system (TPS) using the anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA). Point dose and two-dimensional dose distribution were studied. Percentage variation analysis between calculated and measured doses and gamma evaluation were conducted to determine the most suitable method for treatment planning.ConclusionThis study concludes that an MARCT image with an assigned HU similar to that of the metal implant is better for contouring and high dose calculation accuracy. If MAR is not available, the actual HU value from the extended HU CT for the metal should be used for dose calculation.     

Appropriate endpoints for stereotactic body radiotherapy for bone metastasis: Classification into five treatment groups

Treatment of bone metastasis using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is being widely used in clinical practice. The reported clinical advantages of SBRT include high pain and local control rates, high response rates against bone metastasis from radio-resistant tumors, and safe re-irradiations. Although most reports in the literature use local control as the primary treatment endpoint, this endpoint is not appropriate because local control does not relate directly to patient benefit. Herein, we proposed five pathophysiology-based patient groups, as well as appropriate endpoints for each group.     

EPID-based in vivo dosimetry for stereotactic body radiotherapy of non-small cell lung tumors: Initial clinical experience

PurposeEPID-based in vivo dosimetry (IVD) has been implemented for stereotactic body radiotherapy treatments of non-small cell lung cancer to check both isocenter dose and the treatment reproducibility comparing EPID portal images.Methods15 patients with lung tumors of small dimensions and treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy were enrolled for this initial experience. IVD tests supplied ratios R between in vivo reconstructed and planned isocenter doses. Moreover a γ-like analysis between daily EPID portal images and a reference one, in terms of percentage of points with γ-value smaller than 1, P_γ<1, and mean γ-values, γ_mean, using a local 3%–3 mm criteria, was adopted to check the treatment reproducibility. Tolerance levels of 5% for R ratio, P_γ<1 higher than 90% and γ_mean lower than 0.67 were adopted.ResultsA total of 160 EPID images, two images for each therapy session, were acquired during the treatment of the 15 patients. The overall mean of the R ratios was equal to 1.005 ± 0.014 (1 SD), with 96.9% of tests within ± 5%. The 2 D image γ-like analysis showed an overall γ_mean of 0.39 ± 0.12 with 96.1% of tests within the tolerance level, and an average P_γ<1 value equal to 96.4 ± 3.6% with 95.4% of tests with P_γ<1 > 90%. Paradigmatic discrepancies were observed in three patients: a set-up error and a patient morphological change were identified thanks to CBCT image analysis whereas the third discrepancy was not fully justified.ConclusionsThis procedure can provide improved patient safety as well as a first step to integrate IVD and CBCT dose recalculation.     

Variation of the prescription dose using the analytical anisotropic algorithm in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy

PurposeThe aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the dosimetric variation regarding the analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) relative to other algorithms in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We conducted a multi-institutional study involving six institutions using a secondary check program and compared the AAA to the Acuros XB (AXB) in two institutions.MethodsAll lung SBRT plans (128 patients) were generated using the AAA, pencil beam convolution with the Batho (PBC-B) and adaptive convolve (AC). All institutions used the same secondary check program (simple MU analysis [SMU]) implemented by a Clarkson-based dose calculation algorithm. Measurement was performed in a heterogeneous phantom to compare doses using the three different algorithms and the SMU for the measurements. A retrospective analysis was performed to compute the confidence limit (CL; mean ± 2SD) for the dose deviation between the AAA, PBC, AC and SMU. The variations between the AAA and AXB were evaluated in two institutions, then the CL was acquired.ResultsIn comparing the measurements, the AAA showed the largest systematic dose error (3%). In calculation comparisons, the CLs of the dose deviation were 8.7 ± 9.9% (AAA), 4.2 ± 3.9% (PBC-B) and 5.7 ± 4.9% (AC). The CLs of the dose deviation between the AXB and the AAA were 1.8 ± 1.5% and −0.1 ± 4.4%, respectively, in the two institutions.ConclusionsThe CL of the AAA showed much larger variation than the other algorithms. Relative to the AXB, larger systematic and random deviations still appeared. Thus, care should be taken in the use of AAA for lung SBRT.     

Patient-specific tumor and respiratory monitoring phantom design for quality controls of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy in lung cancer cases

The design, production and adaptability to clinical routine of a patient-specific tumor and respiratory monitoring phantom (TRMP) was investigated using 3D printer technology. TRMP and GTV modelling were done using 4D-CT images of the inhalation phase. The model was converted to STL (Stereolithography) format and printed with STH (Strong Herbal) biopolymer with HU (Hounsfield Unit) suitable for imaging purposes. The assembly of TRMP motorized parts and mechanical equipment has been completed and made suitable for clinical use. In the first part of the study, the deviations of radio-opaque markers attached to the TRMP sternum to perform mechanical quality control tests and T1-7 costal vertebrae in CC, AP, and LAT directions were evaluated. In the second part of the study, in order to evaluate the usability of the TRMP in quality assurance (QA), point dose measurements with BeO OSL dosimetry and EBT3 gafchromic film measurements were taken in Trilogy® radiotherapy accelerator and CyberKnife® robotic radiosurgery accelerator. In this study, we present a highly flexible TMRP capable of performing independent internal and external motions. TRMP was successfully tested in different treatment accelerators, both mechanically and dosimetrically.     

Interfractional diaphragm changes during breath-holding in stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver cancer

Aim and background

IGRT based on bone matching may produce a large target positioning error in terms of the reproducibility of expiration breath-holding on SBRT for liver cancer. We evaluated the intrafractional and interfractional errors using the diaphragm position at the end of expiration by utilising Abches and analysed the factor of the interfractional error.

Hippocampal dose during Linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases: An observational study

IntroductionAim of the present study is to evaluate homolateral and contralateral hippocampus (H-H, C-H, respectively) dose during Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (FSRT) or Radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM).Materials & methodsPatients with BM < 5, size ≤ 30 mm, KPS ≥ 80 and a life expectancy > 3 months, were considered for SRS/FSRT (total dose 15–30 Gy, 1–5 fractions). For each BM, a Flattening Filter Free (FFF) Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plan was generated with one or two arcs. Hippocampi were not considered during optimizations phase and were contoured and evaluated retrospectively in terms of dose: the Dmedian, Dmean, D0.1cc and the V1Gy, V2Gy, V5Gy and V10Gy were analyzed.ResultsFrom April 2014 to December 2015, 81 BM were treated with FFF-FSRT/SRS. For the H-H, the average values of Dmedian, Dmean and D0.1cc were 1.5Gy, 1.54Gy and 2.2Gy, respectively, while the V1Gy, V2Gy, V5Gy and V10Gy values were 25%, 8.9%, 8.9% and 2.1%, respectively. For the C–H, the average Dmedian, Dmean and D0.1 cc were 0.7Gy, 0.7Gy, 0.9Gy, respectively, while the average values of V1Gy, V2Gy, V5Gy and V10Gy were 18%, 10.2%, 2.8% and 1.4%, respectively. Tumor dimension, tumor cranial-caudal length and the distance between BM and H-H were correlated to Dmedian, Dmean and D0.1cc. For C-H, only the distance from PTV was correlated with a dose reduction.ConclusionDuring FFF-FSRT/SRS, hippocampus received a negligible dose. Despite its clinical significance is still under evaluation, in patients with a long life expectancy, H-H should be considered during Linac-based FSRT/SRS.     

Influence of segment width on plan quality for volumetric modulated arc based stereotactic body radiotherapy

Aim

To study the influence of segment width on plan quality for volumetric modulated arc based stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Background

The redundancy of modulation for regularly shaped small volume tumors results in creation of many small segments and an increase of monitor units, with a consequent prolongation of treatment and uncertainty in treatment delivery.

Materials and methods

Six cases each in lung, abdomen and liver were taken for the study. For each case, three VMAT SBRT plans were generated with different penalties on minimum segment width of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 cm. A comparison was made on the metrics of dose volume histogram, dosimetric indices, monitor units (MUs) and delivery accuracy.

Results

The mean reduction of total MUs when compared with 0.5 cm plan was observed as 12.7 ± 6.0% and 17.5 ± 7.2% for 1.0 cm and 1.5 cm of minimum segment width, respectively. The p value showed a significant degradation in dosimetric indices for 1.5 cm plans when compared with 0.5 cm and 1.0 cm plans. The average deviation of measured dose with TPS calculated was 3.0 ± 1.1%, 2.1 ± 0.84% and 1.8 ± 0.9% for 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 cm, respectively. The calculated gamma index with pass criteria of 2% dose difference and 2 mm distance to agreement was 95.9 ± 2.8%, 96.5 ± 2.6% and 97.8 ± 1.6% as calculated for 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 cm of penalties, respectively. In view of the trade off between delivery efficiency and plan quality, 1 cm minimum segment width plans showed an improvement.

Conclusions

VMAT SBRT plans with increased optimal value of minimum segment width showed better plan quality and delivery efficiency for stereotactic body radiotherapy.     

Cell-free DNA as a prognostic marker in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate whether plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) was related to clinical outcome in inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Materials and methods: Plasma cfDNA was assessed at baseline, before the last day and 45 days after the end of SBRT, in 22 NSCLC patients. Twenty-two healthy controls were also evaluated.

Results: Plasma cfDNA was higher in patients than in controls. An association with unfavourable disease-free survival was found for continuous baseline cfDNA increments (HR?=?5.9, 95%CI: 1.7–19.8, p?=?0.04).

Conclusion: Plasma cfDNA may be a promising prognostic biomarker in high-risk NSCLC patients.     

Prognostic factors and clinical outcomes after stereotactic radiotherapy for primary lung tumors

AimTo characterize the population treated with SBRT for early-stage primary lung tumors in our institution, determine their outcomes, and identify potential prognosis factors.BackgroundStereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) is an alternative treatment for inoperable patients with early-stage lung cancer. It confers a local control rate around 90% at 3 years, and 2−3 year overall survival rates of 43–60% in this population.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed all patients treated in our department between 2012 and 2017 and evaluated local progression-free survival (L-PFS), nodal or distant progression-free survival (ND-PFS), global progression-free survival (G-PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease specific survival (DSS). Univariate (UVA) and multivariate (MVA) models were built to assess the influence of each variable.ResultsWe identified 218 patients with 233 tumors. Most were male (78.9%) with a median age of 73 years. Median follow-up was 22 months. At 18 months, L-PFS was 93.7%, ND-PFS was 82.2%, G-PFS was 76.0%, DSS was 90.5%, and OS was 78.0% in ≤ T2 tumors. On UVA, T2 tumors were associated with lower L-PFS, G-PFS and DSS than T1, with no significant impact on ND-PFS or OS, an effect that persisted on MVA. On UVA, L-PFS and G-PFS were negatively influenced by female gender and a 5-fraction schedule was associated with worse G-PFS, which was not confirmed on MVA.ConclusionOur local and distant control rates and survival were similar to those previously reported. On MVA, T2 tumors displayed lower L-PFS, G-PFS and DSS, with no difference in OS.