Distinct Roles for Release Factor 1 and Release Factor 2 in Translational Quality Control

In bacteria, stop codons are recognized by two similar class 1 release factors, release factor 1 (RF1) and release factor 2 (RF2). Normally, during termination, the class 2 release factor 3 (RF3), a GTPase, functions downstream of peptide release where it accelerates the dissociation of RF1/RF2 prior to ribosome recycling. In addition to their canonical function in termination, both classes of release factor are also involved in a post peptidyl transfer quality control (post PT QC) mechanism where the termination factors recognize mismatched (i.e. error-containing) ribosome complexes and promote premature termination. Here, using a well defined in vitro system, we explored the role of release factors in canonical termination and post PT QC. As reported previously, during canonical termination, RF1 and RF2 recognize stop codons in a similar manner, and RF3 accelerates their rate of dissociation. During post PT QC, only RF2 (and not RF1) effectively binds to mismatched ribosome complexes; and whereas the addition of RF3 to RF2 increased its rate of release on mismatched complexes, the addition of RF3 to RF1 inhibited its rate of release but increased the rate of peptidyl-tRNA dissociation. Our data strongly suggest that RF2, in addition to its primary role in peptide release, functions as the principle factor for post PT QC.     

Identification of a Cellular Factor That Modulates HIV-1 Programmed Ribosomal Frameshifting

Programmed −1 ribosomal frameshifting (PRF) is a distinctive mode of gene expression utilized by some viruses, including human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), to produce multiple proteins from a single mRNA. −1 PRF induces a subset of elongating ribosomes to shift their translational reading frame by 1 base in the 5′ direction. The appropriate ratio of Gag to Gag-Pol synthesis is tightly regulated by the PRF signal which promotes ribosomes to shift frame, and even small changes in PRF efficiency, either up or down, have significant inhibitory effects upon virus production, making PRF essential for HIV-1 replication. Although little has been reported about the cellular factors that modulate HIV-1 PRF, the cis-acting elements regulating PRF have been extensively investigated, and the PRF signal of HIV-1 was shown to include a slippery site and frameshift stimulatory signal. Recently, a genome-wide screen performed to identify cellular factors that affect HIV-1 replication demonstrated that down-regulation of eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) inhibited HIV-1 replication. Because of the eRF1 role in translation, we hypothesized that eRF1 is important for HIV-1 PRF. Using a dual luciferase reporter system harboring a HIV-1 PRF signal, results showed that depletion or inhibition of eRF1 enhanced PRF in yeast, rabbit reticulocyte lysates, and mammalian cells. Consistent with the eRF1 role in modulating HIV PRF, depleting eRF1 increased the Gag-Pol to Gag ratio in cells infected with replication-competent virus. The increase in PRF was independent of a proximal termination codon and did not result from increased ribosomal pausing at the slippery site. This is the first time that a cellular factor has been identified which can promote HIV-1 PRF and highlights HIV-1 PRF as essential for replication and an important but under exploited antiviral drug target.     

八肋游仆虫第二类肽链释放因子核定位信号分析

蛋白质合成终止过程中肽链释放因子负责终止密码子的识别.真核生物第二类肽链释放因子（eRF3）是一类GTP酶,协助第一类肽链释放因子（eRF1）识别终止密码子和水解肽酰 tRNA酯键.之前的研究表明,两类肽链释放因子在细胞核中发挥功能,参与蛋白质合成和纺锤体的组装.本研究根据软件预测结果,构建了一系列八肋游仆虫eRF3的截短型突变体,分析在其N端是否存在引导eRF3的核定位信号.结果表明,在eRF3的N端有两个区域（NLS1:23-36 aa 和 NLS2: 236-272 aa）可以引导eRF3进入细胞核中,而且这两个区域具有典型的核定位信号的氨基酸序列特征. eRF3的核定位与其作为一种穿梭蛋白的功能相一致,即参与细胞有丝分裂纺锤体的形成和无义介导的mRNA降解途径.     

Molecular Morphology of Eukaryotic Class-1 Translation Termination Factor eRF1 in Solution

The integral structural parameters and the shape of the molecule of human translation termination factor eRF1 were determined from the small-angle X-ray scattering in solution. The molecular shapes were found by bead modeling with nonlinear minimization of the root-mean-square deviation of the calculated from the experimental scattering curve. Comparisons of the small-angle scattering curves computed for atomic-resolution structures of eRF1 with the experimental data on scattering from solution testified that the crystal and the solution conformations are close. In the ribosome, the distance between the eRF1 motifs GGQ and NIKS must be shorter than in crystal or solution (75 versus 100–107 Å). Therefore, like its bacterial counterpart RF2, the eukaryotic eRF1 must change its conformation as it binds to the ribosome. The conformational mobility of eukaryotic and prokaryotic class-1 release factors is another feature making them functionally akin to tRNA.     

Translation Initiation Requires Cell Division Cycle 123 (Cdc123) to Facilitate Biogenesis of the Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 2 (eIF2)

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (eIF2) is central to the onset of protein synthesis and its modulation in response to physiological demands. eIF2, a heterotrimeric G-protein, is activated by guanine nucleotide exchange to deliver the initiator methionyl-tRNA to the ribosome. Here we report that assembly of the eIF2 complex in vivo depends on Cdc123, a cell proliferation protein conserved among eukaryotes. Mutations of CDC123 in budding yeast reduced the association of eIF2 subunits, diminished polysome levels, and increased GCN4 expression indicating that Cdc123 is critical for eIF2 activity. Cdc123 bound the unassembled eIF2γ subunit, but not the eIF2 complex, and the C-terminal domain III region of eIF2γ was both necessary and sufficient for Cdc123 binding. Alterations of the binding site revealed a strict correlation between Cdc123 binding, the biological function of eIF2γ, and its ability to assemble with eIF2α and eIF2β. Interestingly, high levels of Cdc123 neutralized the assembly defect and restored the biological function of an eIF2γ mutant. Moreover, the combined overexpression of eIF2 subunits rescued an otherwise inviable cdc123 deletion mutant. Thus, Cdc123 is a specific eIF2 assembly factor indispensable for the onset of protein synthesis. Human Cdc123 is encoded by a disease risk locus, and, therefore, eIF2 biogenesis control by Cdc123 may prove relevant for normal cell physiology and human health. This work identifies a novel step in the eukaryotic translation initiation pathway and assigns a biochemical function to a protein that is essential for growth and viability of eukaryotic cells.     

A Translation System Reconstituted with Human Factors Proves That Processing of Encephalomyocarditis Virus Proteins 2A and 2B Occurs in the Elongation Phase of Translation without Eukaryotic Release Factors

The genomic RNA of encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) encodes a single polyprotein, and the primary scission of the polyprotein occurs between nonstructural proteins 2A and 2B by an unknown mechanism. To gain insight into the mechanism of 2A-2B processing, we first translated the 2A-2B region in vitro with eukaryotic and prokaryotic translation systems. The 2A-2B processing occurred only in the eukaryotic systems, not in the prokaryotic systems, and the unprocessed 2A-2B protein synthesized by a prokaryotic system remained uncleaved when incubated with a eukaryotic cell extract. These results suggest that 2A-2B processing is a eukaryote-specific, co-translational event. To define the translation factors required for 2A-2B processing, we constituted a protein synthesis system with eukaryotic elongation factors 1 and 2, eukaryotic release factors 1 and 3 (eRF1 and eRF3), aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, tRNAs, ribosome subunits, and a plasmid template that included the hepatitis C virus internal ribosome entry site. We successfully reproduced 2A-2B processing in the reconstituted system even without eRFs. Our results indicate that this unusual event occurs in the elongation phase of translation.     

Thermodynamic and Kinetic Framework of Selenocysteyl-tRNASec Recognition by Elongation Factor SelB

SelB is a specialized translation elongation factor that delivers selenocysteyl-tRNA^Sec (Sec-tRNA^Sec) to the ribosome. Here we show that Sec-tRNA^Sec binds to SelB·GTP with an extraordinary high affinity (K_d = 0.2 pm). The tight binding is driven enthalpically and involves the net formation of four ion pairs, three of which may involve the Sec residue. The dissociation of tRNA from the ternary complex SelB·GTP·Sec-tRNA^Sec is very slow (0.3 h⁻¹), and GTP hydrolysis accelerates the release of Sec-tRNA^Sec by more than a million-fold (to 240 s⁻¹). The affinities of Sec-tRNA^Sec to SelB in the GDP or apoforms, or Ser-tRNA^Sec and tRNA^Sec to SelB in any form, are similar (K_d = 0.5 μm). Thermodynamic coupling in binding of Sec-tRNA^Sec and GTP to SelB ensures at the same time the specificity of Sec- versus Ser-tRNA^Sec selection and rapid release of Sec-tRNA^Sec from SelB after GTP cleavage on the ribosome. SelB provides an example for the evolution of a highly specialized protein-RNA complex toward recognition of unique set of identity elements. The mode of tRNA recognition by SelB is reminiscent of another specialized factor, eIF2, rather than of EF-Tu, the common delivery factor for all other aminoacyl-tRNAs, in line with a common evolutionary ancestry of SelB and eIF2.     

Decoding the Decoding Region: Analysis of Eukaryotic Release Factor (eRF1) Stop Codon-Binding Residues

Peptide synthesis in eukaryotes terminates when eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) binds to an mRNA stop codon and occupies the ribosomal A site. Domain 1 of the eRF1 protein has been implicated in stop codon recognition in a number of experimental studies. In order to further pinpoint the residues of this protein involved in stop codon recognition, we sequenced and compared eRF1 genes from a variety of ciliated protozoan species. We then performed a series of computational analyses to evaluate the conservation, accessibility, and structural environment of each amino acid located in domain 1. With this new dataset and methodology, we were able to identify eight specific amino acid sites important for stop codon recognition and also to propose a set of cooperative paired substitutions that may underlie stop codon reassignment. Our results are more consistent with current experimental data than previously described models.Han Liang, Jonathan Y. Wong,Contributed equally to this paperReviewingEditor: Dr. Niles Lehman     

Replacing the Factor VIII C1 Domain with a Second C2 Domain Reduces Factor VIII Stability and Affinity for Factor IXa

Factor VIII (FVIII) consists of a heavy chain (A1(a1)A2(a2)B domains) and light chain ((a3)A3C1C2 domains). To gain insights into a role of the FVIII C domains, we eliminated the C1 domain by replacing it with the homologous C2 domain. FVIII stability of the mutant (FVIII_C2C2) as measured by thermal decay at 55 °C of FVIII activity was markedly reduced (∼11-fold), whereas the decay rate of FVIIIa due to A2 subunit dissociation was similar to WT FVIIIa. The binding affinity of FVIII_C2C2 for phospholipid membranes as measured by fluorescence resonance energy transfer was modestly lower (∼2.8-fold) than that for WT FVIII. Among several anti-FVIII antibodies tested (anti-C1 (GMA8011), anti-C2 (ESH4 and ESH8), and anti-A3 (2D2) antibody), only ESH4 inhibited membrane binding of both WT FVIII and FVIII_C2C2. FVIIIa cofactor activity measured in the presence of each of the above antibodies was examined by FXa generation assays. The activity of WT FVIIIa was inhibited by both GMA8011 and ESH4, whereas the activity of FVIII_C2C2 was inhibited by both the anti-C2 antibodies, ESH4 and ESH8. Interestingly, factor IXa (FIXa) binding affinity for WT FVIIIa was significantly reduced in the presence of GMA8011 (∼10-fold), whereas the anti-C2 antibodies reduced FIXa binding affinity of FVIII_C2C2 variant (∼4-fold). Together, the reduced stability plus impaired FIXa interaction of FVIII_C2C2 suggest that the C1 domain resides in close proximity to FIXa in the FXase complex and contributes a critical role to FVIII structure and function.     

Overexpression of Eukaryotic Translation Elongation Factor 3 Impairs Gcn2 Protein Activation

In eukaryotes, phosphorylation of translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) by the kinase Gcn2 (general control nonderepressible 2) is a key response to amino acid starvation. Sensing starvation requires that Gcn2 directly contacts its effector protein Gcn1, and both must contact the ribosome. We have proposed that Gcn2 is activated by uncharged tRNA bound to the ribosomal decoding (A) site, in a manner facilitated by ribosome-bound Gcn1. Protein synthesis requires cyclical association of eukaryotic elongation factors (eEFs) with the ribosome. Gcn1 and Gcn2 are large proteins, raising the question of whether translation and monitoring amino acid availability can occur on the same ribosome. Part of the ribosome-binding domain in Gcn1 has homology to one of the ribosome-binding domains in eEF3, suggesting that these proteins utilize overlapping binding sites on the ribosome and consequently cannot function simultaneously on the same ribosome. Supporting this idea, we found that eEF3 overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae diminished growth on amino acid starvation medium (Gcn⁻ phenotype) and decreased eIF2α phosphorylation, and that the growth defect associated with constitutively active Gcn2 was diminished by eEF3 overexpression. Overexpression of the eEF3 HEAT domain, or C terminus, was sufficient to confer a Gcn⁻ phenotype, and both fragments have ribosome affinity. eEF3 overexpression did not significantly affect Gcn1-ribosome association, but it exacerbated the Gcn⁻ phenotype of Gcn1-M7A that has reduced ribosome affinity. Together, this suggests that eEF3 blocks Gcn1 regulatory function on the ribosome. We propose that the Gcn1-Gcn2 complex only functions on ribosomes with A-site-bound uncharged tRNA, because eEF3 does not occupy these stalled complexes.     

游仆虫肽链释放因子eRF1对编程性翻译移码的影响

编程性翻译移码是mRNA翻译为多肽链时核糖体沿mRNA正向或反向滑动1个碱基才能表达出1个完整多肽链的现象. 人的肽链释放因子eRF1对HIV-1病毒的编程性-1移码有直接的影响. 而且在频繁发生编程性+1移码的单细胞真核生物游仆虫中,肽链释放因子eRF1对编程性移码也有明显的影响. 为进一步研究eRF1中影响编程性翻译移码的关键序列及调控机理,本研究将含有不同终止密码子的移码序列和已报道的游仆虫移码基因Ndr2分别插入双荧光素酶报告基因中,成功建立了可在酵母中进行研究的编程性移码报告检测体系. 利用游仆虫肽链释放因子Eo-eRF1b的N结构域和酵母肽链释放因子Sc eRF1的MC结构域构建了杂合肽链释放因子(Eo/Sc eRF1),检测Eo-eRF1b N结构域中的不同突变位点对移码效率的影响. 结果表明,游仆虫肽链释放因子eRF1b中YCF区的突变能明显促进含终止密码UAA的移码序列的移码,推测这可能是由于eRF1突变体降低了对UAA的识别所导致. 此外,杂合肽链释放因子Eo/Sc eRF1能够有效地提高移码基因Ndr2的移码效率. eRF1b中YCF区的突变同样能明显促进 Ndr2的移码. 因此, 游仆虫肽链释放因子YCF区的特殊序列可能是这种生物中发生编程性移码频率较高的原因之一. 本研究为探讨纤毛虫编程性翻译移码调控机制提供了实验数据.     

Chemical footprinting reveals conformational changes of 18S and 28S rRNAs at different steps of translation termination on the human ribosome

Translation termination in eukaryotes is mediated by release factors: eRF1, which is responsible for stop codon recognition and peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis, and GTPase eRF3, which stimulates peptide release. Here, we have utilized ribose-specific probes to investigate accessibility of rRNA backbone in complexes formed by association of mRNA- and tRNA-bound human ribosomes with eRF1•eRF3•GMPPNP, eRF1•eRF3•GTP, or eRF1 alone as compared with complexes where the A site is vacant or occupied by tRNA. Our data show which rRNA ribose moieties are protected from attack by the probes in the complexes with release factors and reveal the rRNA regions increasing their accessibility to the probes after the factors bind. These regions in 28S rRNA are helices 43 and 44 in the GTPase associated center, the apical loop of helix 71, and helices 89, 92, and 94 as well as 18S rRNA helices 18 and 34. Additionally, the obtained data suggest that eRF3 neither interacts with the rRNA ribose-phosphate backbone nor dissociates from the complex after GTP hydrolysis. Taken together, our findings provide new information on architecture of the eRF1 binding site on mammalian ribosome at various translation termination steps and on conformational rearrangements induced by binding of the release factors.     

Characterization of Eukaryotic Release Factor 3 (eRF3) Translation Termination Factor in Plants

Plant Molecular Biology Reporter - Eukaryotic translation termination is mediated by two conserved interacting release factors, eRF1 and eRF3. eRF1 recognizes the stop codon and promotes the...     

The Molecular Mechanism of Eukaryotic Elongation Factor 2 Kinase Activation

Calmodulin (CaM)-dependent eukaryotic elongation factor 2 kinase (eEF-2K) impedes protein synthesis through phosphorylation of eukaryotic elongation factor 2 (eEF-2). It is subject to complex regulation by multiple upstream signaling pathways, through poorly described mechanisms. Precise integration of these signals is critical for eEF-2K to appropriately regulate protein translation rates. Here, an allosteric mechanism comprising two sequential conformations is described for eEF-2K activation. First, Ca²⁺/CaM binds eEF-2K with high affinity (K_d(CaM)^app = 24 ± 5 nm) to enhance its ability to autophosphorylate Thr-348 in the regulatory loop (R-loop) by > 10⁴-fold (k_auto = 2.6 ± 0.3 s⁻¹). Subsequent binding of phospho-Thr-348 to a conserved basic pocket in the kinase domain potentially drives a conformational transition of the R-loop, which is essential for efficient substrate phosphorylation. Ca²⁺/CaM binding activates autophosphorylated eEF-2K by allosterically enhancing k_cat^app for peptide substrate phosphorylation by 10³-fold. Thr-348 autophosphorylation results in a 25-fold increase in the specificity constant (k_cat^app/K_m(Pep-S)^app), with equal contributions from k_cat^app and K_m(Pep-S)^app, suggesting that peptide substrate binding is partly impeded in the unphosphorylated enzyme. In cells, Thr-348 autophosphorylation appears to control the catalytic output of active eEF-2K, contributing more than 5-fold to its ability to promote eEF-2 phosphorylation. Fundamentally, eEF-2K activation appears to be analogous to an amplifier, where output volume may be controlled by either toggling the power switch (switching on the kinase) or altering the volume control (modulating stability of the active R-loop conformation). Because upstream signaling events have the potential to modulate either allosteric step, this mechanism allows for exquisite control of eEF-2K output.     

Identification of eRF3b,a Human Polypeptide Chain Release Factor with eRF3 Activity in vitroand in vivo

Termination of translation in eukaryotes is governed by the ribosome, a termination codon in the mRNA, and two polypeptide chain release factors (eRF1 and eRF3). We have identified a human protein of 628 amino acids, named eRF3b, which is highly homologous to the known human eRF3 henceforth named eRF3a. At the nucleotide and at the amino acid levels the human eRF3a and eRF3b are about 87% identical. The differences in amino acid sequence are concentrated near the amino terminus. The most important difference in the nucleotide sequence is that eRF3b lacks a GGC repeat close to the initiation codon in eRF3a. We have cloned the cDNA encoding the human eRF3b, purified the eRF3b expressed in Escherichia coli, and found that the protein is active in vitroas a potent stimulator of the release factor activity of human eRFl. Like eRF3a, eRF3b exhibits GTPase activity, which is ribosome- and eRFl-dependent. In vivoassays (based on suppression of readthrough induced by three species of suppressor tRNAs: amber, ochre, and opal) show that the human eRF3b is able to enhance the release factor activity of endogenous and overexpressed eRF1 with all three stop codons.     

Structure of the mammalian ribosomal pre-termination complex associated with eRF1?eRF3?GDPNP

Eukaryotic translation termination results from the complex functional interplay between two release factors, eRF1 and eRF3, in which GTP hydrolysis by eRF3 couples codon recognition with peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis by eRF1. Here, we present a cryo-electron microscopy structure of pre-termination complexes associated with eRF1•eRF3•GDPNP at 9.7 -Å resolution, which corresponds to the initial pre-GTP hydrolysis stage of factor attachment and stop codon recognition. It reveals the ribosomal positions of eRFs and provides insights into the mechanisms of stop codon recognition and triggering of eRF3’s GTPase activity.     

β-Hairpin Loop of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 1 (eIF1) Mediates 40 S Ribosome Binding to Regulate Initiator tRNAMet Recruitment and Accuracy of AUG Selection in Vivo

Recognition of the translation initiation codon is thought to require dissociation of eIF1 from the 40 S ribosomal subunit, enabling irreversible GTP hydrolysis (P_i release) by the eIF2·GTP·Met-tRNA_i ternary complex (TC), rearrangement of the 40 S subunit to a closed conformation incompatible with scanning, and stable binding of Met-tRNA_i to the P site. The crystal structure of a Tetrahymena 40 S·eIF1 complex revealed several basic amino acids in eIF1 contacting 18 S rRNA, and we tested the prediction that their counterparts in yeast eIF1 are required to prevent premature eIF1 dissociation from scanning ribosomes at non-AUG triplets. Supporting this idea, substituting Lys-60 in helix α1, or either Lys-37 or Arg-33 in β-hairpin loop-1, impairs binding of yeast eIF1 to 40 S·eIF1A complexes in vitro, and it confers increased initiation at UUG codons (Sui⁻ phenotype) or lethality, in a manner suppressed by overexpressing the mutant proteins or by an eIF1A mutation (17–21) known to impede eIF1 dissociation in vitro. The eIF1 Sui⁻ mutations also derepress translation of GCN4 mRNA, indicating impaired ternary complex loading, and this Gcd⁻ phenotype is likewise suppressed by eIF1 overexpression or the 17–21 mutation. These findings indicate that direct contacts of eIF1 with 18 S rRNA seen in the Tetrahymena 40 S·eIF1 complex are crucial in yeast to stabilize the open conformation of the 40 S subunit and are required for rapid TC loading and ribosomal scanning and to impede rearrangement to the closed complex at non-AUG codons. Finally, we implicate the unstructured N-terminal tail of eIF1 in blocking rearrangement to the closed conformation in the scanning preinitiation complex.