高等植物中的蛋白磷酸酶与信号传递途径

蛋白激酶与蛋白磷酸酶在细胞信号传递中起着重要作用。有关高等植物中蛋白激酶的研究工作已经较多,但关于蛋白磷酸酶的研究在以前却未受到足够的重视。本文主要介绍最近有关蛋白磷酸酶在高等植物的信号传递中有重要作用的研究工作。这些与蛋白磷酸酶有关的信号传递途径包括气孔运动调节与脱落酸的信号转导、植物对病原及逆境的响应以及植物发育的调控。这些研究工作清楚地证明,蛋白磷酸酶的功能不仅表现为蛋白激酶功能的逆向平衡机制,而且在许多信号传递过程中蛋白磷酸酶起着主导作用。     

Protein Phosphatases and Signaling Cascades in Higher Plants

Protein kinases and phosphatases play a central role in cellular signaling. Although protein kinases have been widely studied in higher plants, protein phosphatases have been largely neglected until recently. The article focuses on the most recent studies that have placed protein phosphatases in the context of several signal cascades in higher plants. These pathways include stomatal regulation and abscisic acid signal transduction, pathogen and stress responses, and developmental control. Studies clearly have demonstrated that protein phosphatases function not only to counterbalance the protein kinases but also take a leading role in many signaling processes.     

Insulin signaling pathways in time and space

Despite remarkable progress in dissecting the signaling pathways that are crucial for the metabolic effects of insulin, the molecular basis for the specificity of its cellular actions is not fully understood. One clue might lie in the spatial and temporal aspects of signaling. Recent evidence suggests that signaling molecules and pathways are localized to discrete compartments in cells by specific protein interactions. Also, the rapid termination of tyrosine or lipid phosphorylation by phosphatases or serine kinases might tightly control the strength of a signaling pathway, thus determining its effect on growth, differentiation and metabolism.     

The membrane and lipids as integral participants in signal transduction: lipid signal transduction for the non-lipid biochemist

Reviews of signal transduction have often focused on the cascades of protein kinases and protein phosphatases and their cytoplasmic substrates that become activated in response to extracellular signals. Lipids, lipid kinases, and lipid phosphatases have not received the same amount of attention as proteins in studies of signal transduction. However, lipids serve a variety of roles in signal transduction. They act as ligands that activate signal transduction pathways as well as mediators of signaling pathways, and lipids are the substrates of lipid kinases and lipid phosphatases. Cell membranes are the source of the lipids involved in signal transduction, but membranes also constitute lipid barriers that must be traversed by signal transduction pathways. The purpose of this review is to explore the magnitude and diversity of the roles of the cell membrane and lipids in signal transduction and to highlight the interrelatedness of families of lipid mediators in signal transduction.     

Live cell imaging of phosphoinositide dynamics with fluorescent protein domains

Phosphoinositides make up only a small fraction of membrane phospholipids yet they are of outmost significance in regulating membrane-associated signaling processes. A large number of inositol lipid kinases and phosphatases have evolved to control the rapid production and elimination of these lipids at specific cellular membrane compartments. For a long period of time, the only information about the spatial aspect of inositol lipid metabolism relied upon the immunostaining of enzymes or cell fractionation of the enzyme activities that acted upon these lipids. Recent advances in the understanding of the nature of protein-inositol lipid interactions permitted the design of fluorescent molecular probes that can interact with inositol lipids in a specific manner allowing imaging of phosphoinositide dynamics in live cells. This approach has rapidly gained high popularity, but also provoked criticisms and debate about its limitations. In this review, we will summarize our experience with using these molecular tools and address some issues that most often come up in discussions concerning the usefulness and drawbacks of this technique. The most important value of these debates is that they also challenge our preconceived views of how phosphoinositides regulate cellular functions.     

Switching the flip: protein phosphatase roles in signaling pathways

Protein phosphatases are the obligate partners of protein kinases in cellular control circuitry. Several specific roles of phosphatases have been revealed in plant systems through recent work capitalizing on functional genomics, interaction screens and activation-tagging approaches. Historically, the redundancy of genes that encode phosphatase functions has impeded genetic analysis in plant systems, and relatively few elucidated signaling pathways include protein phosphatases that have clearly defined substrates. Functional genomics, interaction and suppression screens, activation tagging and phosphoproteomics now hold great promise for identifying phosphatases that are active in signaling and regulation, and for revealing their in vivo substrates. This level of analysis will be essential for a full understanding of the effects of reversible protein phosphorylation in modulating and integrating cellular activities.     

Structural insight into effector proteins of Gram-negative bacterial pathogens that modulate the phosphoproteome of their host

Invading pathogens manipulate cellular process of the host cell to establish a safe replicative niche. To this end they secrete a spectrum of proteins called effectors that modify cellular environment through a variety of mechanisms. One of the most important mechanisms is the manipulation of cellular signaling through modifications of the cellular phosphoproteome. Phosphorylation/dephosphorylation plays a pivotal role in eukaryotic cell signaling, with ∼500 different kinases and ∼130 phosphatases in the human genome. Pathogens affect the phosphoproteome either directly through the action of bacterial effectors, and/or indirectly through downstream effects of host proteins modified by the effectors. Here we review the current knowledge of the structure, catalytic mechanism and function of bacterial effectors that modify directly the phosphorylation state of host proteins. These effectors belong to four enzyme classes: kinases, phosphatases, phospholyases and serine/threonine acetylases.     

Visualization and perturbation of phosphoinositide and phospholipid signaling

Cells signal through lipids that are produced by phospholipid (PL) and phosphoinositide (PIPn) metabolism involve three enzymatic processes: (i) ester and phosphodiester hydrolysis by phospholipases, (ii) monophosphate hydrolysis by phosphatases, and (iii) phosphorylation of hydroxy groups by kinases. Unregulated enzyme activity correlates with specific pathologies, which are specific targets for therapeutic intervention. A variety of reagents now permit monitoring of in vitro enzyme activity, spatiotemporal changes of intracellular lipid concentrations, and identification of lipid-protein interactions. This minireview summarizes a chemical biology approach that illustrates how chemically synthesized affinity probes can be used to characterize changes in lipid signaling in cellular and molecular biology.     

Signal transduction through the T cell receptor is dynamically regulated by balancing kinase and phosphatase activities

Within seconds of T cell receptor engagement, a well-characterized series of tyrosine phosphorylation events mediate cellular activation. It is widely accepted that these initial phosphorylations remain stable until protein tyrosine phosphatases return the cell to its basal level. Based on a model of peripheral blood T cell activation, in which the kinetics of phosphorylation can be modulated, we propose an alternate hypothesis that T cell signaling is highly dynamic. Our results demonstrate that tyrosine phosphorylation and dephosphorylation are occurring co-temporally after T cell receptor cross-linking, regulated by a delicate balance of kinases and phosphatases.     

Protein kinase A and two phosphatases are components of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor macromolecular signaling complex

The inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) is a ubiquitously expressed intracellular calcium (Ca(2+)) release channel on the endoplasmic reticulum. IP3Rs play key roles in controlling Ca(2+) signals that activate numerous cellular functions including T cell activation, neurotransmitter release, oocyte fertilization and apoptosis. There are three forms of IP3R, all of which are ligand-gated channels activated by the second messenger inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate. Channel function is modulated via cross-talk with other signaling pathways including those mediated by kinases and phosphatases. In particular IP3Rs are known to be regulated by cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) phosphorylation. In the present study we show that PKA and the protein phosphatases PP1 and PP2A are components of the IP3R1 macromolecular signaling complex. PKA phosphorylation of IP3R1 increases channel activity in planar lipid bilayers. These studies indicate that regulation of IP3R1 function via PKA phosphorylation involves components of a macromolecular signaling complex.     

Intrinsic fluctuations, robustness, and tunability in signaling cycles

Covalent modification cycles (e.g., phosphorylation-dephosphorylation) underlie most cellular signaling and control processes. Low molecular copy number, arising from compartmental segregation and slow diffusion between compartments, potentially renders these cycles vulnerable to intrinsic chemical fluctuations. How can a cell operate reliably in the presence of this inherent stochasticity? How do changes in extrinsic parameters lead to variability of response? Can cells exploit these parameters to tune cycles to different ranges of stimuli? We study the dynamics of an isolated phosphorylation cycle. Our model shows that the cycle transmits information reliably if it is tuned to an optimal parameter range, despite intrinsic fluctuations and even for small input signal amplitudes. At the same time, the cycle is sensitive to changes in the concentration and activity of kinases and phosphatases. This sensitivity can lead to significant cell-to-cell response variability. It also provides a mechanism to tune the cycle to transmit signals in various amplitude ranges. Our results show that signaling cycles possess a surprising combination of robustness and tunability. This combination makes them ubiquitous in eukaryotic signaling, optimizing signaling in the presence of fluctuations using their inherent flexibility. On the other hand, cycles tuned to suppress intrinsic fluctuations can be vulnerable to changes in the number and activity of kinases and phosphatases. Such trade-offs in robustness to intrinsic and extrinsic fluctuations can influence the evolution of signaling cascades, making them the weakest links in cellular circuits.     

MAPK signaling to the early secretory pathway revealed by kinase/phosphatase functional screening

To what extent the secretory pathway is regulated by cellular signaling is unknown. In this study, we used RNA interference to explore the function of human kinases and phosphatases in controlling the organization of and trafficking within the secretory pathway. We identified 122 kinases/phosphatases that affect endoplasmic reticulum (ER) export, ER exit sites (ERESs), and/or the Golgi apparatus. Numerous kinases/phosphatases regulate the number of ERESs and ER to Golgi protein trafficking. Among the pathways identified, the Raf–MEK (MAPK/ERK [extracellular signal-regulated kinase] kinase)–ERK cascade, including its regulatory proteins CNK1 (connector enhancer of the kinase suppressor of Ras-1) and neurofibromin, controls the number of ERESs via ERK2, which targets Sec16, a key regulator of ERESs and COPII (coat protein II) vesicle biogenesis. Our analysis reveals an unanticipated complexity of kinase/phosphatase-mediated regulation of the secretory pathway, uncovering a link between growth factor signaling and ER export.     

MAPK的细胞内定位与激活后移位机制

信号蛋白的亚细胞定位和激活后移位已成为细胞信号转导研究中的重要内容.MAPK信号通路是真核细胞中的重要信号转导系统.MAPK在细胞中有着相对固定的定位,在适宜的刺激作用下会移位入核并产生相应的生理效应.目前认为,MAPK的磷酸化状态及与其他蛋白质,如上游激酶、磷酸酶和下游底物之间的相互作用,可能在其特异性定位与激活后移位中起作用.MAPK的定位与移位机制的阐明,有助于进一步揭示MAPK的生理功能.     

Mechanisms of leukocyte lipid body formation and function in inflammation

An area of increasingly interest for the understanding of cell signaling are the spatio-temporal aspects of the different enzymes involved in lipid mediator generation (eicosanoid-forming enzymes, phospholipases and their regulatory kinases and phosphatases) and pools of lipid precursors. The compartmentalization of signaling components within discrete and dynamic sites in the cell is critical for specificity and efficiency of enzymatic reactions of phosphorilation, enzyme activation and function. We hypothesized that lipid bodies--inducible non-membrane bound cytoplasmic lipid domains--function as specialized intracellular sites of compartmentalization of signaling with major roles in lipid mediator formation within leukocytes engaged in inflammatory process. Over the past years substantial progresses have been made demonstrating that all enzymes involved in eicosanoid synthesis localize at lipid bodies and lipid bodies are distinct sites for eicosanoid generation. Here we will review our current knowledge on the mechanisms of formation and functions of lipid bodies pertinent to inflammation.     

Lipid-dependent recruitment of neuronal Src to lipid rafts in the brain

Although most Src family tyrosine kinases are modified by palmitoylation as well as myristoylation, Src itself is only myristoylated. Dual acylation is important for attachment to liquid-ordered microdomains or lipid rafts. Accordingly, Src is excluded from lipid rafts in fibroblasts. Evidence of partial genetic redundancy between Src and Fyn for brain-specific targets suggests that these two kinases may occupy overlapping subcellular locations. Neuronal Src (NSrc), an alternative isoform of Src with a 6-amino acid insert in the Src homology 3 domain, is highly expressed in neurons. We investigated whether this structural difference in NSrc allows it to associate with lipid rafts. We found that perinatal mouse brains express predominantly NSrc, which is partly (10-20%) in a lipid raft fraction from brain but not fibroblasts. The association of Src with brain lipid rafts does not depend on the NSrc insert but depends on the amino-terminal myristoylation signal. A crude lipid fraction from brain promotes NSrc entry into rafts in vitro. Moreover, lipid raft-localized NSrc is more catalytically active than NSrc from the soluble fraction, possibly because raft localization alters access to other tyrosine kinases and phosphatases. These findings suggest that NSrc may be involved in signaling from lipid rafts in mouse brain.     

Cdc42/Rac1-mediated activation primes PAK2 for superactivation by tyrosine phosphorylation

The involvement of p21-activated kinases (PAKs) in important cellular processes such as regulation of the actin skeleton morphology, transduction of signals controlling gene expression, and execution of programmed cell death has directed attention to the regulation of the activity of these kinases. Here we report that activation of PAK2 by p21 GTPases can be strongly potentiated by cellular tyrosine kinases. PAK2 became tyrosine phosphorylated in its N-terminal regulatory domain, where Y130 was identified as the major phosphoacceptor site. Tyrosine phosphorylation-mediated superactivation of PAK2 could be induced by overexpression of different Src kinases or by inhibiting cellular tyrosine phosphatases with pervanadate and could be blocked by the Src kinase inhibitor PP1 or by mutating the Y130 residue. Analysis of PAK2 mutants activated by amino acid changes in the autoinhibitory domain or the catalytic domain indicated that GTPase-induced conformational changes, rather than catalytic activation per se, rendered PAK2 a target for tyrosine phosphorylation. Thus, PAK activation represents a potentially important point of convergence of tyrosine kinase- and p21 GTPase-dependent signaling pathways.     

Dephosphorylation by default, a potential mechanism for regulation of insulin receptor substrate-1/2, Akt, and ERK1/2

Protein phosphorylation is an important mechanism that controls many cellular activities. Phosphorylation of a given protein is precisely controlled by two opposing biochemical reactions catalyzed by protein kinases and protein phosphatases. How these two opposing processes are coordinated to achieve regulation of protein phosphorylation is unresolved. We have developed a novel experimental approach to directly study protein dephosphorylation in cells. We determined the kinetics of dephosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1/2, Akt, and ERK1/2, phosphoproteins involved in insulin receptor signaling. We found that insulin-induced ERK1/2 and Akt kinase activities were completely abolished 10 min after inhibition of the corresponding upstream kinases with PD98059 and LY294002, respectively. In parallel experiments, insulin-induced phosphorylation of Akt, ERK1/2, and insulin receptor substrate-1/2 was decreased and followed similar kinetics. Our findings suggest that these proteins are dephosphorylated by a default mechanism, presumably via constitutively active phosphatases. However, dephosphorylation of these proteins is overcome by activation of protein kinases following stimulation of the insulin receptor. We propose that, during acute insulin stimulation, the kinetics of protein phosphorylation is determined by the interplay between upstream kinase activity and dephosphorylation by default.     

p38 and Chk1 kinases: different conductors for the G(2)/M checkpoint symphony.

The mechanism controlling G(2)/M checkpoint activation after DNA damage was thought to be mediated primarily by nuclear Chk1/Chk2 kinases. Recent evidence indicates that this checkpoint is more complex, involving at least two different biochemical systems that target the Cdc25B and Cdc25C phosphatases. Following genotoxic stress, different kinases integrate signaling from the damaged DNA and other damaged cellular components to regulate Cdc25 inactivation. Our current model for G(2)/M checkpoint activation after genotoxic stress is discussed emphasizing the roles for Chk1 and p38 kinases in checkpoint regulation.