Mechanisms of polarized targeting of the FSH receptor]

Gonadotropin and TSH receptors belong to a subgroup of G protein-coupled receptors. TSH and FSH receptor present a particular intracellular traffic: they present a polarized basolateral expression in thyroid follicular cells and in Sertoli cells respectively. By contrast, the LH receptor is expressed circumferentially in target gonadic cells. We expressed these receptors in MDCK cells (a well characterized model of polarized epithelial cells) to understand this difference of properties. We show that the three receptors have a polarized basolateral expression in these cells. All contain a basolateral targeting signal. Furthermore, gonadotropin receptors undergo a partial transcytosis which is not observed for the TSH receptor. We show that heterotrimeric G proteins play a role in this mechanism of transcytosis. This effect is not mediated by adenylate cyclase activation and involves a population of G proteins different from that involved in signal transduction. We thus used in vitro mutagenesis to delineate the basolateral localization signal of the FSH receptor. Surprisingly, the signal is localized in the C-terminal tail of the intracellular domain which is not conserved between the three receptors. It contains 14 amino-acids and its activity is mainly dependent on a tyrosine and a leucine residue. The basolateral localization signal of the FSHR is not colinear with its internalization signal. This signal is autonomous and dominant because, when transferred to an apically targeted membrane protein, the neurotrophin receptor, it redirects the chimeric construct to the basolateral domain of MDCK cells. The basolateral localization signal of the FSH receptor is thus the first signal identified for a G protein-coupled receptor and more generally for a hormone receptor.     

Identification of a basolateral sorting signal for the M3 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) can be differentially localized in polarized cells. To identify potential sorting signals that mediate mAChR targeting, we examined the sorting of mAChRs in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells, a widely used model system. Expression of FLAG-tagged mAChRs in polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells demonstrated that the M(2) subtype is sorted apically, whereas M(3) is targeted basolaterally. Expression of M(2)/M(3) receptor chimeras revealed that a 21-residue sequence, Ser(271)-Ser(291), from the M(3) third intracellular loop contains a basolateral sorting signal. Substitution of sequences containing the M(3) sorting signal into the homologous regions of M(2) was sufficient to confer basolateral localization to this apical receptor. Sequences containing the M(3) sorting signal also conferred basolateral targeting to M(2) when added to either the third intracellular loop or the C-terminal cytoplasmic tail. Furthermore, addition of a sequence containing the M(3) basolateral sorting signal to the cytoplasmic tail of the interleukin-2 receptor alpha-chain caused significant basolateral targeting of this heterologous apical protein. The results indicate that the M(3) basolateral sorting signal is dominant over apical signals in M(2) and acts in a position-independent manner. The M(3) sorting signal represents a novel basolateral targeting motif for G protein-coupled receptors.     

Hierarchy of sorting signals in chimeras of intestinal lactase-phlorizin hydrolase and the influenza virus hemagglutinin

Lactase-phlorizin hydrolase (LPH) is an apical protein in intestinal cells. The location of sorting signals in LPH was investigated by preparing a series of mutants that lacked the LPH cytoplasmic domain or had the cytoplasmic domain of LPH replaced by sequences that comprised basolateral targeting signals and overlapping internalization signals of various potency. These signals are mutants of the cytoplasmic domain of the influenza hemagglutinin (HA), which have been shown to be dominant in targeting HA to the basolateral membrane. The LPH-HA chimeras were expressed in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) and colon carcinoma (Caco-2) cells, and their transport to the cell surface was analyzed. All of the LPH mutants were targeted correctly to the apical membrane. Furthermore, the LPH-HA chimeras were internalized, indicating that the HA tails were available to interact with the cytoplasmic components of clathrin-coated pits. The introduction of a strong basolateral sorting signal into LPH was not sufficient to override the strong apical signals of the LPH external domain or transmembrane domains. These results show that basolateral sorting signals are not always dominant over apical sorting signals in proteins that contain each and suggest that sorting of basolateral from apical proteins occurs within a common compartment where competition for sorting signals can occur.     

Importance of the carboxyl-terminal FTSL motif of membrane cofactor protein for basolateral sorting and endocytosis. Positive and negative modulation by signals inside and outside the cytoplasmic tail.

Membrane cofactor protein (MCP), a widely distributed complement regulatory protein, is expressed on the basolateral surface of polarized epithelial cells, and it is not endocytosed. The carboxyl-terminal tetrapeptide (FTSL) is required for polarized surface expression. The ability of this tetrapeptide to serve as an autonomous sorting signal has been analyzed by adding this sequence motif to the C terminus of an apical membrane protein, the influenza A virus hemagglutinin (HA). The recombinant protein HA-FTSL retained the apical localization of the parental HA protein. Substitution of the complete cytoplasmic tail of MCP for the cytoplasmic tail of HA resulted in the targeting of the chimeric protein (HA/MCP) to the basolateral surface suggesting that the carboxyl-terminal FTSL motif is a weak sorting signal that requires additional targeting information from the membrane-proximal part of the cytoplasmic tail of MCP for redirecting an apical protein to the basolateral membrane domain. In contrast to the native HA, the HA-FTSL protein was subject to endocytosis. The basolateral HA/MCP was also found to be internalized and thus differed from the basolateral MCP. This result suggests that the carboxyl-terminal FTSL motif serves as an internalization signal and that in native MCP sorting information outside the cytoplasmic tail counteracts this endocytosis signal. Substitution of a tyrosine for the phenylalanine dramatically increased the internalization with most of the HA-YTSL protein being present intracellularly. Our results are consistent with the view that the interplay of multiple sorting signals and the modification of a well known targeting signal (YTSL) by amino acid exchange (FTSL) determine the constitutive expression of MCP on the basolateral surface of polarized epithelial cells.     

The epithelial-specific adaptor AP1B mediates post-endocytic recycling to the basolateral membrane

To perform vectorial secretory and transport functions that are critical for the survival of the organism, epithelial cells sort plasma membrane proteins into polarized apical and basolateral domains. Sorting occurs post-synthetically, in the trans Golgi network (TGN) or after internalization from the cell surface in recycling endosomes, and is mediated by apical and basolateral sorting signals embedded in the protein structure. Basolateral sorting signals include tyrosine motifs in the cytoplasmic domain that are structurally similar to signals involved in receptor internalization by clathrin-coated pits. Recently, an epithelial-specific adaptor protein complex, AP1B, was identified. AP-1B recognizes a subset of basolateral tyrosine motifs through its mu 1B subunit. Here, we characterized the post-synthetic and post-endocytic sorting of the fast recycling low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) and transferrin receptor (TfR) in LLC-PK1 cells, which lack mu 1B and mis-sort both receptors to the apical surface. Targeting and recycling assays in LLC-PK1 cells, before and after transfection with mu 1B, and in MDCK cells, which express mu 1B constitutively, suggest that AP1B sorts basolateral proteins post-endocytically.     

Apical and basolateral coated pits of MDCK cells differ in their rates of maturation into coated vesicles, but not in the ability to distinguish between mutant hemagglutinin proteins with different internalization signals

In polarized epithelial MDCK cells, all known endogenous endocytic receptors are found on the basolateral domain. The influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) which is normally sorted to the apical plasma membrane, can be converted to a basolateral protein by specific mutations in its short cytoplasmic domain that also create internalization signals. For some of these mutations, sorting to the basolateral surface is incomplete, allowing internalization of two proteins that differ by a single amino acid of the internalization signal to be compared at both the apical and basolateral surfaces of MDCK cells. The rates of internalization of HA-Y543 and HA-Y543,R546 from the basolateral surface of polarized MDCK cells resembled those in nonpolarized cells, whereas their rates of internalization from the apical cell surface were fivefold slower. However, HA-Y543,R546 was internalized approximately threefold faster than HA-Y543 at both membrane domains, indicating that apical endocytic pits in polarized MDCK cells retained the ability to discriminate between different internalization signals. Slower internalization from the apical surface could not be explained by a limiting number of coated pits: apical membrane contained 0.7 as many coated pits per cell cross-section as did basolateral membranes. 10-14% of HA-Y543 at the apical surface of polarized MDCK cells was found in coated pits, a percentage not significantly different from that observed in apical coated pits of nonpolarized MDCK cells, where internalization was fivefold faster. Thus, there was no lack of binding sites for HA-Y543 in apical coated pits of polarized cells. However, at the apical surface many more shallow pits, and fewer deep, mature pits, were observed than were seen at the basolateral. These results suggest that the slower internalization at the apical surface is due to slower maturation of coated pits, and not to a difference in recognition of internalization signals.     

The cytoplasmic tail of lysosomal acid phosphatase contains overlapping but distinct signals for basolateral sorting and rapid internalization in polarized MDCK cells.

Lysosomal acid phosphatase (LAP) is synthesized as a type I membrane glycoprotein and targeted to lysosomes via the plasma membrane. Its cytoplasmic tail harbours a tyrosine-containing signal for rapid internalization. Expression in Madine-Darby canine kidney cells results in direct sorting to the basolateral cell surface, rapid endocytosis and delivery to lysosomes. In contrast, a deletion mutant lacking the cytoplasmic tail is delivered to the apical plasma membrane where it accumulates before it is slowly internalized. A chimeric protein, in which the cytoplasmic tail of LAP is fused to the extracytoplasmic and transmembrane domain of the apically sorted haemagglutinin, is sorted to the basolateral plasma membrane. A series of truncation and substitution mutants in the cytoplasmic tail was constructed and comparison of their polarized sorting and internalization revealed that the determinants for basolateral sorting and rapid internalization reside in the same segment of the cytoplasmic tail. The cytoplasmic factors decoding these signals, however, tolerate distinct mutations indicating that different receptors are involved in sorting at the trans-Golgi network and at the plasma membrane.     

Basolateral sorting signals differ in their ability to redirect apical proteins to the basolateral cell surface

Polarized sorting of membrane proteins in epithelial cells is mediated by cytoplasmic basolateral signals or by apical signals in the transmembrane or exoplasmic domains. Basolateral signals were generally found to be dominant over apical determinants. We have generated chimeric proteins with the cytoplasmic domain of either the asialoglycoprotein receptor H1 or the transferrin receptor, two basolateral proteins, fused to the transmembrane and exoplasmic segments of aminopeptidase N, an apical protein, and analyzed them in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Whereas both cytoplasmic sequences induced endocytosis of the chimeras, only that of the transferrin receptor mediated basolateral expression in steady state. The H1 fusion protein, although still largely sorted to the basolateral side in biosynthetic surface transport, was subsequently resorted to the apical cell surface. We tested whether the difference in sorting between trimeric wild-type H1 and the dimeric aminopeptidase chimera was caused by the number of sorting signals presented in the oligomers. Consistent with this hypothesis, the H1 signal was fully functional in a tetrameric fusion protein with the transmembrane and exoplasmic domains of influenza neuraminidase. The results suggest that basolateral signals per se need not be dominant over apical determinants for steady-state polarity and emphasize an important contribution of the valence of signals in polarized sorting.     

An internal deletion in the cytoplasmic tail reverses the apical localization of human NGF receptor in transfected MDCK cells

A cDNA encoding the full-length 75-kD human nerve growth factor receptor was transfected into MDCK cells and its product was found to be expressed predominantly (80%) on the apical membrane, as a result of vectorial targeting from an intracellular site. Apical hNGFR bound NGF with low affinity and internalized it inefficiently (6% of surface bound NGF per hour). Several mutant hNGFRs were analyzed, after transfection in MDCK cells, for polarized surface expression, ligand binding, and endocytosis. Deletionof juxta-membrane attachment sites for a cluster of O-linked sugars did not alter apical localization. A mutant receptor lacking the entire cytoplasmic tail (except for the five proximal amino acids) was also expressed on the apical membrane, suggesting that information for apical sorting was contained in the ectoplasmic or transmembrane domains. However, a 58 amino acid deletion in the hNGFR tail that moved a cytoplasmic tyrosine (Tyr 308) closer to the membrane into a more charged environment resulted in a basolateral distribution of the mutant receptor and reversed vectorial (basolateral) targeting. The basolateral mutant receptor also internalized 125I-NGF rapidly (90% of surface bound NGF per hour), exhibited a larger intracellular fraction and displayed a considerably shortened half-life (approximately 3 h). We suggest that hNGFR with the internal cytoplasmic deletion expresses a basolateral targeting signal, related to endocytic signals, that is dominant over apical targeting information in the ecto/transmembrane domains. These results apparently contradict a current model that postulates that basolateral targeting is a default mechanism.     

Basolateral targeting of ERBB2 is dependent on a novel bipartite juxtamembrane sorting signal but independent of the C-terminal ERBIN-binding domain

ERBB2 is a receptor tyrosine kinase present on the basolateral membrane of polarized epithelia and has important functions in organ development and tumorigenesis. Using mutagenic analyses and Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, we have investigated the signals that regulate basolateral targeting of ERBB2. We show that basolateral delivery of ERBB2 is dependent on a novel bipartite juxtamembrane sorting signal residing between Gln-692 and Thr-701. The signal shows only limited sequence homology to known basolateral targeting signals and is both necessary and sufficient for correct sorting of ERBB2. In addition we demonstrate that this motif can function as a dominant basolateral targeting signal by its ability to redirect the apically localized P75 neurotrophin receptor to the basolateral membrane domain of polarized epithelial cells. Interestingly, LLC-PK1 cells, which are deficient for the micro 1B subunit of the AP1B adaptor complex, missort a large proportion of ERBB2 to the apical membrane domain. This missorting can be partially corrected by the introduction of micro 1B, suggesting a possible role for AP1B in ERBB2 endosomal trafficking. Furthermore, we find that the C-terminal ERBIN binding domain of ERBB2 is not necessary for its basolateral targeting in MDCK cells.     

The cytoplasmic tail of CD1d contains two overlapping basolateral sorting signals

CD1d is a member of the CD1 polypeptide family that represents a new arm of host defense against invading pathogens. In our previous work (Rodionov, D. G., Nordeng, T. W., Pedersen, K., Balk, S. P., and Bakke, O. (1999) J. Immunol. 162, 1488-1495) we have shown that CD1d contained a classic tyrosine-based internalization signal (YQGV) in its short cytoplasmic tail. CD1d is expressed in polarized epithelial cells, and we found that the cytoplasmic tail of CD1d also contained information for basolateral sorting. Interestingly, a mutation of the critical tyrosine residue of the endosomal sorting signal did not result in the loss of basolateral targeting of the mutant CD1d. To search for a basolateral sorting signal we have constructed a full set of alanine mutants, but no single alanine substitution inactivated the signal. However, deletions or mutations of either the C-terminal valine/leucine pair or the critical tyrosine residue from the internalization signal and either residue from the C-terminal valine/leucine pair inactivated basolateral sorting. Our data thus suggest that the cytoplasmic tail contains two overlapping basolateral signals, one tyrosine- and the other leucine-based, each being sufficient to direct CD1d to the basolateral membrane of polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney cells.     

Regulation of EGF signaling by cell polarity in MDCK kidney epithelial cells.

Although the presence of a dominant basolateral sorting signal ensures that the majority of newly synthesized epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors are delivered directly to the basolateral surface in polarized epithelial cells, a fraction of the receptors are also delivered to the apical surface. Similar to most basolateral membrane proteins, the EGF receptor has an additional signal(s) that selectively targets molecules lacking a dominant basolateral signal to the apical surface. Although the physiological relevance of signal hierarchy is not known, alternative targeting may occur in different epithelial cell types or during development. The goal of this study, therefore, was to determine the effect of membrane domain location on EGF receptor function, focusing on EGF-induced MAP kinase signaling and DNA synthesis. Whereas ligand responsiveness was restricted to the basolateral domain in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells expressing a normal complement of receptors, apical ligand was effective if apical receptor density was increased by overexpression of an exogenous wild-type human gene. Unexpectedly, cells expressing apically localized, cytoplasmically truncated receptors, which behave as dominant negative mutations in other cell types, were also responsive to apical EGF. The cytoplasmically truncated molecules appear to have at least two effects: first, to increase the local concentration of ligand at the apical cell surface; and second, to facilitate activation of the relatively few native EGF receptors normally located at the apical surface. These results indicate that cell context is a critical determinant of receptor mutant protein phenotype.     

Trafficking of immunoglobulin receptors in epithelial cells:signals and cellular factors

A typical feature of epithelial cells is the polarized distribution of their respective plasma membrane proteins. Apical and basolateral proteins can be sorted both in the trans-Golgi network and endosomes, or in both locations. Inclusion into basolateral carriers in the TGN requires the presence of distinct cytoplasmic determinants, which also appear to be recognized in endosomes. Inactivation of the basolateral sorting information leads to the efficient apical delivery, probably due to the unmasking of a recessive apical signal. Factors associated with the cytosolic face of organelles probably not only recognize these signals to mediate the inclusion of the proteins into the correct transport vesicles, but also target the carriers to the corresponding plasma membrane domain. Our interest has focused on analyzing at the molecular level how epithelial MDCK cells generate and maintain a polarized phenotype, taking advantage of immunoglobulin receptors to study the biosynthetic and endocytic pathways and the corresponding sorting events.     

Carboxy terminus of glucose transporter 3 contains an apical membrane targeting domain

We previously demonstrated that distinct facilitative glucose transporter isoforms display differential sorting in polarized epithelial cells. In Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, glucose transporter 1 and 2 (GLUT1 and GLUT2) are localized to the basolateral cell surface whereas GLUTs 3 and 5 are targeted to the apical membrane. To explore the molecular mechanisms underlying this asymmetric distribution, we analyzed the targeting of chimeric glucose transporter proteins in MDCK cells. Replacement of the carboxy-terminal cytosolic tail of GLUT1, GLUT2, or GLUT4 with that from GLUT3 resulted in apical targeting. Conversely, a GLUT3 chimera containing the cytosolic carboxy terminus of GLUT2 was sorted to the basolateral membrane. These findings are not attributable to the presence of a basolateral signal in the tails of GLUTs 1, 2, and 4 because the basolateral targeting of GLUT1 was retained in a GLUT1 chimera containing the carboxy terminus of GLUT5. In addition, we were unable to demonstrate the presence of an autonomous basolateral sorting signal in the GLUT1 tail using the low-density lipoprotein receptor as a reporter. By examining the targeting of a series of more defined GLUT1/3 chimeras, we found evidence of an apical targeting signal involving residues 473-484 (DRSGKDGVMEMN) in the carboxy tail. We conclude that the targeting of GLUT3 to the apical cell surface in MDCK cells is regulated by a unique cytosolic sorting motif.     

A novel cellular phenotype for familial hypercholesterolemia due to a defect in polarized targeting of LDL receptor

Basolateral targeting of membrane proteins in polarized epithelial cells typically requires cytoplasmic domain sorting signals. In the familial hypercholesterolemia (FH)-Turku LDL receptor allele, a mutation of glycine 823 residue affects the signal required for basolateral targeting in MDCK cells. We show that the mutant receptor is mistargeted to the apical surface in both MDCK and hepatic epithelial cells, resulting in reduced endocytosis of LDL from the basolateral/sinusoidal surface. Consequently, virally encoded mutant receptor fails to mediate cholesterol clearance in LDL receptor-deficient mice, suggesting that a defect in polarized LDL receptor expression in hepatocytes underlies the hypercholesterolemia in patients harboring this allele. This evidence directly links the pathogenesis of a human disease to defects in basolateral targeting signals, providing a genetic confirmation of these signals in maintaining epithelial cell polarity.     

Requirement for galectin-3 in apical protein sorting

The central aspect of epithelial cells is their polarized structure, characterized by two distinct domains of the plasma membrane, the apical and the basolateral membrane. Apical protein sorting requires various signals and different intracellular routes to the cell surface. The first apical targeting motif identified is the membrane anchoring of a polypeptide by glycosyl-phosphatidyl-inositol (GPI). A second group of apical signals involves N- and O-glycans, which are exposed to the luminal side of the sorting organelle. Sucrase-isomaltase (SI) and lactase-phlorizin hydrolase (LPH), which use separate transport platforms for trafficking, are two model proteins for the study of apical protein sorting. In contrast to LPH, SI associates with sphingolipid/cholesterol-enriched membrane microdomains or "lipid rafts". After exit form the trans-Golgi network (TGN), the two proteins travel in distinct vesicle populations, SAVs (SI-associated vesicles) and LAVs (LPH-associated vesicles) . Here, we report the identification of the lectin galectin-3 delivering non-raft-dependent glycoproteins in the lumen of LAVs in a carbohydrate-dependent manner. Depletion of galectin-3 from MDCK cells results in missorting of non-raft-dependent apical membrane proteins to the basolateral cell pole. This suggests a direct role of galectin-3 in apical sorting as a sorting receptor.     

Basolateral sorting of LDL receptor in MDCK cells: the cytoplasmic domain contains two tyrosine-dependent targeting determinants.

In MDCK cells, transport of membrane proteins to the basolateral plasma membrane has been shown to require a distinct cytoplasmic domain determinant. Although the determinant is often related to signals used for localization in clathrin-coated pits, inactivation of the coated pit domain in the human LDL receptor did not affect basolateral targeting. By expressing mutant and chimeric LDL receptors, we have now identified two independently acting signals that are individually sufficient for basolateral targeting. The two determinants mediate basolateral sorting with different efficiencies, but both contain tyrosine residues critical for activity. The first determinant was colinear with, but distinct from, the coated pit domain of the receptor. The second was found in the C-terminal region of the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor and, although tyrosine-dependent, did not mediate endocytosis. The results suggest that membrane proteins can have functionally redundant signals for basolateral transport and that a tyrosine-containing motif may be a common feature of multiple intracellular sorting events.     

A di-leucine motif mediates endocytosis and basolateral sorting of macrophage IgG Fc receptors in MDCK cells.

An important function of the low affinity IgG Fc receptor FcRII-B2 (FcR) on macrophages is the internalization of soluble antigen-antibody complexes for lysosomal degradation. Most endocytic receptors possess tyrosine-containing cytoplasmic determinants required for endocytosis. In many proteins, signals which overlap with the endocytosis determinant and share the same critical tyrosine residue also mediate basolateral sorting in the trans-Golgi network of epithelial cells. Despite the presence of two tyrosine residues in the FcR cytosolic domain, neither one is absolutely required for coated pit localization or basolateral targeting. Nevertheless, a short domain of 13 residues containing one of the non-critical tyrosine residues mediates endocytosis and basolateral delivery. Alanine scan mutagenesis of this region now revealed a critical role of a leucine-leucine motif in both events. These findings suggest that endocytosis and basolateral sorting can be mediated by both tyrosine- and di-leucine-based signals and confirm the close relationship between the two determinants already observed for 'classical' tyrosine-dependent motifs.     

Core-glycosylated mucin-like repeats from MUC1 are an apical targeting signal

MUC1 is efficiently delivered to the apical surface of polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells by transit through apical recycling endosomes, a route associated with delivery of apical proteins with glycan-dependent targeting signals. However, a role for glycans in MUC1 sorting has not been established. A key feature of MUC1 is a heavily O-glycosylated mucin-like domain with a variable number of nearly perfect tandem repeats and adjacent imperfect repeats. Metabolic labeling, cell surface biotinylation, immobilized lectins, and confocal immunofluorescence microscopy were used to characterize the polarized delivery of MUC1 mutants and chimeras in MDCK cells to identify the apical targeting signal. Both the interleukin-2 receptor α subunit (Tac) and a chimera where the Tac ectodomain replaced that of MUC1 were delivered primarily to the basolateral surface. Attachment of the MUC1 mucin-like domain to the N terminus of Tac enhanced apical but not basolateral delivery when compared with Tac. Conversely, deletions within the mucin-like domain in MUC1 reduced apical but not basolateral delivery when compared with MUC1. In pull-down assays with lectins, we found a notable difference in the presence of core 1 O-glycans, but not poly-N-acetyllactosamine, in apically targeted MUC1 and chimeras when compared with Tac. Consistent with these data, we found no effect on MUC1 targeting when galectin-3, with preference for poly-N-acetyllactosamine, was depleted from polarized MDCK cells. However, we did block the apical targeting activity of the mucin-like repeats when we overexpressed CMP-Neu5Ac:GalNAc-Rα2,6-sialyltransferase-1 to block core O-glycan synthesis. The cumulative data indicate that the core-glycosylated mucin-like repeats of MUC1 constitute an apical targeting signal.