Referral for menstrual problems: cross sectional survey of symptoms,reasons for referral,and management

ObjectivesTo describe the menstrual experience of women referred for menstrual problems, in particular menorrhagia (excessive menstrual loss), and to assess associations with reasons for referral given by their general practitioners, the women''s understanding of the reasons for their attendance at the hospital clinics, and clinic outcome.DesignQuestionnaire survey, with partial review of case notes after 8 months.SettingThree hospital gynaecology clinics in Glasgow and Edinburgh.Participants952 women completed the questionnaire, and the first 665 were reviewed.ResultsOnly 38% (95% confidence interval 34% to 41%) of women reported excessive menstrual loss as a severe problem. However 60% (57-63%) gave it as reason for attending a clinic, and 76% (73-79%) of general practitioners gave it as reason for referral. Reason for referral was significantly biased towards bleeding (McNemar odds ratio 4.01, 3.0 to 5.3, P<0.001) and against pain (0.54, 0.4 to 0.7, P<0.001). Dysfunctional uterine bleeding was diagnosed in 37% (31-42%) of the 259 women who gave as reason for attendance something other than bleeding. Women who were economically disadvantaged differed in prevalence of the main diagnoses and were more likely to fail to reattend. Hysterectomy was associated with referral for bleeding (relative risk 4.9, 1.6 to 15.6, P<0.001) but not with the patient stating bleeding as the reason for clinic attendance.ConclusionsIntolerance of the volume of their bleeding is not a key feature among women attending clinics for bleeding problems. Broad menstrual complaint tends to be reframed as excessive bleeding at referral and during management. This may result in women receiving inappropriate care. Conceptualisation and assessment of menorrhagia requires reconsideration.

What is already known on this topic

Excessive menstrual loss (menorrhagia) is one of the commonest reasons for secondary referral of women, but there is no formalised clinical assessment in routine useManagement typically involves potent drugs or invasive surgery, with 60% of women having hysterectomy within 5 yearsMany women referred for menorrhagia have menstrual blood loss that is not excessive

What this study adds

Discordance exists between symptoms and both referral and diagnostic pathways, arising from a disproportionate focus on menstrual bleedingAmong women referred for menorrhagia, volume of bleeding is not a key symptomThis raises concerns about conceptualisation and assessment of menstrual complaint and the appropriateness of healthcare provision     

A multicentre observational study of presentation and early assessment of acute stroke

ObjectiveTo investigate delays in the presentation to hospital and evaluation of patients with suspected stroke.DesignMulticentre prospective observational study.Setting22 hospitals in the United Kingdom and Dublin.Participants739 patients with suspected stroke presenting to hospital.ResultsThe median age of patients was 75 years, and 400 were women. The median delay between onset of symptoms and arrival at hospital was 6 hours (interquartile range 1 hour 48 minutes to 19 hours 12 minutes). 37% of patients arrived within 3 hours, 50% within 6 hours. The median delay for patients using the emergency service was 2 hours 3 minutes (47 minutes to 7 hours 12 minutes) compared with 7 hours 12 minutes (2 hours 5 minutes to 20 hours 37 minutes) for referrals from general practitioners (P<0.0001). Use of emergency services reduced delays to hospital (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.23 to 0.61). The median time to evaluation by a senior doctor was 1 hour 9 minutes (interquartile range 33 minutes to 1 hour 50 minutes) but was undertaken in only 477 (65%) patients within 3 hours of arrival. This was not influenced by age, sex, time of presentation, mode of referral, hospital type, or the presence of a stroke unit. Computed tomography was requested within 3 hours of arrival in 166 (22%) patients but undertaken in only 60 (8%).ConclusionDelays in patients arriving at hospital with suspected stroke can be reduced by the increased use of emergency services. Over a third of patients arrive at hospital within three hours of stroke; their management can be improved by expediting medical evaluation and performing computed tomography early.

What is already known on this topic

Delay in presentation and assessment of patients with suspected stroke prevents the possible benefits from thrombolysis being achievedLittle is known about the presentation and early management of patients with acute stroke in the United Kingdom

What this study adds

Most patients with suspected stroke in the United Kingdom arrive at hospital within six hours of the onset of symptomsNot all patients are evaluated by a senior doctor within three hours of arrival at hospital and most do not undergo computed tomographyThe potential for thrombolysis in patients with acute stroke can be improved significantly by greater use of emergency services and expediting evaluation and investigations by doctors     

Will Patients Benefit from Regionalization of Gynecologic Cancer Care?

Objective

Patient chances for cure and palliation for a variety of malignancies may be greatly affected by the care provided by a treating hospital. We sought to determine the effect of volume and teaching status on patient outcomes for five gynecologic malignancies: endometrial, cervical, ovarian and vulvar carcinoma and uterine sarcoma.

Methods

The Florida Cancer Data System dataset was queried for all patients undergoing treatment for gynecologic cancers from 1990–2000.

Results

Overall, 48,981 patients with gynecologic malignancies were identified. Endometrial tumors were the most common, representing 43.2% of the entire cohort, followed by ovarian cancer (30.9%), cervical cancer (20.8%), vulvar cancer (4.6%), and uterine sarcoma (0.5%). By univariate analysis, although patients treated at high volume centers (HVC) were significantly younger, they benefited from an improved short-term (30-day and/or 90-day) survival for cervical, ovarian and endometrial cancers. Multivariate analysis (MVA), however, failed to demonstrate significant survival benefit for gynecologic cancer patients treated at teaching facilities (TF) or HVC. Significant prognostic factors at presentation by MVA were age over 65 (HR = 2.6, p<0.01), African-American race (HR = 1.36, p<0.01), and advanced stage (regional HR = 2.08, p<0.01; advanced HR = 3.82, p<0.01, respectively). Surgery and use of chemotherapy were each significantly associated with improved survival.

Conclusion

No difference in patient survival was observed for any gynecologic malignancy based upon treating hospital teaching or volume status. Although instances of improved outcomes may occur, overall further regionalization would not appear to significantly improve patient survival.     

Quality improvement report: The “jaundice hotline” for the rapid assessment of patients with jaundice

ProblemPatients with jaundice require rapid diagnosis and treatment, yet such patients are often subject to delay.DesignAn open referral, rapid access jaundice clinic was established by reorganisation of existing services and without the need for significant extra resources.

Background and setting

A large general hospital in a largely rural and geographically isolated area.

Key measures for improvement

Waiting times for referral, consultation, diagnosis, and treatment, length of stay in hospital, and general practitioners'' and patients'' satisfaction with the service.

Strategies for change

Referrals were made through a 24 hour telephone answering machine and fax line. Initial assessment of patients was carried out by junior staff as part of their working week. Dedicated ultrasonography appointments were made available.

Effects of change

Of 107 patients seen in the first year of the service, 62 had biliary obstruction. The mean time between referral and consultation was 2.5 days. Patients who went on to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography waited 5.7 days on average. The mean length of stay in hospital in the 69 patients who were admitted was 6.1 days, compared with 11.5 days in 1996, as shown by audit data. Nearly all the 36 general practices (95%) and the 30 consecutive patients (97%) that were surveyed rated the service as above average or excellent.

Lessons learnt

An open referral, rapid access service for patients with jaundice can shorten time to diagnosis and treatment and length of stay in hospital. These improvements can occur through the reorganisation of existing services and with minimal extra cost.     

Quality improvement report: Safety and efficacy of nurse initiated thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction

ProblemDelay in starting thrombolytic treatment in patients arriving at hospital with chest pain who are diagnosed as having acute myocardial infarction.DesignAudit of “door to needle times” for patients presenting with chest pain and an electrocardiogram on admission that confirmed acute myocardial infarction. A one year period in each of three phases of development was studied.

Background and setting

The goal of the national service framework for coronary heart disease is that by April 2002, 75% of eligible patients should receive thrombolysis within 30 minutes of arriving at hospital. A district general hospital introduced a strategy to improve door to needle times. In phase 1 (1989-95), patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction, referred by general practitioners, were assessed in the coronary care unit; all other patients were seen first in the accident and emergency department. In phase 2 (1995-7), all patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction were transferred directly to a fast track area within the coronary care unit, where nurses assess patients and doctors started treatment.

Key measures for improvement

Median door to needle time in phase 1 of 45 minutes (range 5-300 minutes), with 38% of patients treated within 30 minutes. Median door to needle time in phase 2 of 40 minutes (range 5-180 minutes), with 47% treated within 30 minutes

Strategies for change

In phase 3 (1997-2001), all patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction were transferred directly to the fast track area and assessed by a “coronary care thrombolysis nurse.” If electrocardiography confirmed the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, the nurse could initiate thrombolytic therapy (subject to guidelines and exclusions determined by the consultant cardiologists).

Effects of change

Median door to needle time in phase 3 of 15 minutes (range 5-70 minutes), with 80% of patients treated within 30 minutes. Systematic clinical review showed no cases in which a nurse initiated inappropriate thrombolysis.

Lessons learnt

Thrombolysis started by nurses is safe and effective in patients with acute myocardial infarction. It may provide a way by which the national service framework''s targets for door to needle times can be achieved.     

Testing for Helicobacter pylori infection: validation and diagnostic yield of a near patient test in primary care

ObjectiveTo evaluate the performance of a near patient test for Helicobacter pylori infection in primary care.DesignValidation study performed within a randomised trial of four management strategies for dyspepsia.Setting43 general practices around Nottingham.Subjects394 patients aged 18-70 years presenting with recent onset dyspepsia.ResultsWhen used in primary care FlexSure test had a sensitivity and specificity of 67% (95% confidence interval 59% to 75%) and 98% (95% to 99%) compared with a sensitivity and specificity of 92% (87% to 97%) and 90% (83% to 97%) when used previously in secondary care. Of the H pylori test and refer group 14% (28/199) were found to have conditions for which H pylori eradication was appropriate compared with 23% (39/170) of the group referred directly for endoscopy.ConclusionsWhen used in primary care the sensitivity of the FlexSure test was significantly poorer than in secondary care. About a third of patients who would have benefited from H pylori eradication were not detected. Near patient tests need to be validated in primary care before they are incorporated into management policies for dyspepsia.

Key messages

• Near patient tests for H pylori infection have been recommended in the management of dyspepsia in primary care without proper evaluation
• Such tests should have a high sensitivity to avoid missing treatable illness related to infection
• The FlexSure near patient test had a lower sensitivity than previously reported in validation studies performed in secondary care
• Fewer than expected numbers of patients with H pylori related pathology were identified with the FlexSure in primary care

     

Relation between insufficient response to antihypertensive treatment and poor compliance with treatment: a prospective case-control study

ObjectivesTo prospectively compare compliance with treatment in patients with hypertension responsive to treatment versus patients with treatment resistant hypertension.DesignProspective case-control study.SettingOutpatient department in a large city hospital in Switzerland, providing primary, secondary, and tertiary care.Participants110 consecutive medical outpatients with hypertension and taking stable treatment with at least two antihypertensive drugs for at least four weeks.ResultsComplete data were available for 103 patients, of whom 86 took ⩾80% of their prescribed doses (“compliant”) and 17 took <80% (“non-compliant”). Of the 49 patients with treatment resistant hypertension, 40 (82%) were compliant, while 46 (85%) of the 54 patients responsive to treatment were compliant.ConclusionNon-compliance with treatment was not more prevalent in patients with treatment resistant hypertension than in treatment responsive patients.

What is already known on this topic

For many patients with arterial hypertension, blood pressure cannot be adequately controlled despite treatment with antihypertensive drugsPatients'' poor compliance with treatment is often suggested as the reason for lack of response to antihypertensive drugs

What this study adds

When treatment compliance was monitored in hypertensive patients following stable treatment regimens, no difference in compliance was found between those with treatment resistant hypertension and those responsive to treatmentFactors other than patients'' compliance with treatment regimens should be examined to explain lack of response to antihypertensive drugs     

Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data

ObjectivesTo ascertain hospital inpatient mortality in England and to determine which factors best explain variation in standardised hospital death ratios.DesignWeighted linear regression analysis of routinely collected data over four years, with hospital standardised mortality ratios as the dependent variable.SettingEngland.SubjectsEight million discharges from NHS hospitals when the primary diagnosis was one of the diagnoses accounting for 80% of inpatient deaths.ResultsThe four year crude death rates varied across hospitals from 3.4% to 13.6% (average for England 8.5%), and standardised hospital mortality ratios ranged from 53 to 137 (average for England 100). The percentage of cases that were emergency admissions (60% of total hospital admissions) was the best predictor of this variation in mortality, with the ratio of hospital doctors to beds and general practitioners to head of population the next best predictors. When analyses were restricted to emergency admissions (which covered 93% of all patient deaths analysed) number of doctors per bed was the best predictor.ConclusionAnalysis of hospital episode statistics reveals wide variation in standardised hospital mortality ratios in England. The percentage of total admissions classified as emergencies is the most powerful predictor of variation in mortality. The ratios of doctors to head of population served, both in hospital and in general practice, seem to be critical determinants of standardised hospital death rates; the higher these ratios, the lower the death rates in both cases.

Key messages

• Between 1991-2 and 1994-5 average standardised hospital mortality ratios in English hospitals reduced by 2.6% annually, but the ratios varied more than twofold among the hospitals
• After adjustment for the percentage of emergency cases and for age, sex, and primary diagnosis, the best predictors of standardised hospital death rates were the numbers of hospital doctors per bed and of general practitioners per head of population in the localities from which hospital admissions were drawn
• England has one of the lowest number of physicians per head of population of the OECD countries, being only 59% of the OECD average
• It is now possible to control for factors outside the direct influence of hospital policy and thereby produce a more valid measure of hospital quality of care

     

Pragmatic randomised controlled trial to evaluate guidelines for the management of infertility across the primary care-secondary care interface

ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of clinical guidelines on the management of infertility across the primary care-secondary care interface.DesignCluster randomised controlled trial.SettingGeneral practices and NHS hospitals accepting referrals for infertility in the Greater Glasgow Health Board area.ParticipantsAll 221 general practices in Glasgow; 214 completed the trial.InterventionGeneral practices in the intervention arm received clinical guidelines developed locally. Control practices received them one year later. Dissemination of the guidelines included educational meetings.ResultsData on 689 referrals were collected. No significant difference was found in referral rates for infertility. Fewer than 1% of couples were referred inappropriately early. Referrals from intervention practices were significantly more likely to have all relevant investigations carried out (odds ratio 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.75, P=0.025). 70% of measurements of serum progesterone concentrations during the midluteal phase and 34% of semen analyses were repeated at least once in hospital, despite having been recorded as normal when checked in general practice. No difference was found in the proportion of referrals in which a management plan was reached within one year or in the mean duration between first appointment and date of management plan. NHS costs were not significantly affected.ConclusionsDissemination of infertility guidelines by commonly used methods results in a modest increase in referrals having recommended investigations completed in general practice, but there are no detectable differences in outcome for patients or reduction in costs. Clinicians in secondary care tended to fail to respond to changes in referral practice by doctors. Guidelines that aim to improve the referral process need to be disseminated and implemented so as to lead to changes in both primary care and secondary care.

What is already known on this topic

Most previous research into clinical guidelines has focused on their development and implementationEvidence is lacking about the outcomes and costs associated with the use of clinical guidelines

What this study adds

Clinical guidelines that may alter the balance of care between general practice and hospital settings require more intensive implementation than guidelines aimed at either setting on its ownThe cost effectiveness of clinical guidelines should not be assumed     

Quality improvement report: Information given to patients before appointments and its effect on non-attendance rate

Problem Wasted outpatient appointments as a result of clinic non-attendance, exacerbating outpatient waiting times.DesignSingle centre, prospective, non-randomised, controlled study.

Background and setting

Diabetes clinic in a district general hospital run by a consultant, one or two diabetes nurse specialists, a dietitian, and a podiatrist. Clinic receives 10-15 new referrals a week in a health district with a population of 340 000.

Key measure for improvement

Non-attendance rate in 325 new patients who attended after the intervention compared with 1336 historical controls from the same clinic in the three years before the scheme.

Strategy for change

Two weeks before their outpatient appointment new patients were sent an information pack telling them when and where to come, where to park, what to bring, who they will see, and what to expect. One week before the appointment they received a supplementary phone call.

Effects of change

Telling patients what to expect reduced non-attendance rate overall from 15% (201/1336) to 4.6% (15/325), P<0.0001. Non-attendance rate was 7.3% (13/178) in those sent a pack but not phoned and 1.4% (2/147) in those sent a pack and phoned, P=0.01.

Lesson learnt

Giving new patients detailed information reduces non-attendance to almost 1%.     

Synergism between allergens and viruses and risk of hospital admission with asthma: case-control study

ObjectiveTo investigate the importance of sensitisation and exposure to allergens and viral infection in precipitating acute asthma in adults resulting in admission to hospital.DesignCase-control study.SettingLarge district general hospital.Participants60 patients aged 17-50 admitted to hospital over a year with acute asthma, matched with two controls: patients with stable asthma recruited from the outpatient department and patients admitted to hospital with non-respiratory conditions (inpatient controls).ResultsViruses were detected in 31 of 177 patients. The difference in the frequency of viruses detected between the groups was significant (admitted with asthma 26%, stable asthma 18%, inpatient controls 9%; P=0.04). A significantly higher proportion of patients admitted with asthma (66%) were sensitised and exposed to either mite, cat, or dog allergen than patients with stable asthma (37%) and inpatient controls (15%; P<0.001). Being sensitised and exposed to allergens was an independent associate of the group admitted to hospital (odds ratio 2.3, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 5.4; P=0.05), whereas the combination of sensitisation, high exposure to one or more allergens, and viral detection considerably increased the risk of being admitted with asthma (8.4, 2.1 to 32.8; P=0.002).ConclusionsAllergens and viruses may act together to exacerbate asthma.

What is already known on this topic

Studies on segmental allergen challenge of the lung and experimental rhinovirus infection show synergistic effects between allergens and respiratory virus infectionNo studies have investigated an interaction between sensitisation, exposure to allergens, and virus infections in real life exacerbations of asthma

What this study adds

Allergens and viruses may act together to exacerbate asthma, indicating that domestic exposure to allergens acts synergistically with viruses in sensitised patients, increasing the risk of hospital admissionStrategies to reduce the impact of asthma exacerbations in adults should include interventions directed at both viruses and reducing exposure to allergens     

Nurse led follow up and conventional medical follow up in management of patients with lung cancer: randomised trial

ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of nurse led follow up in the management of patients with lung cancer.DesignRandomised controlled trial.SettingSpecialist cancer hospital and three cancer units in southeastern England.Participants203 patients with lung cancer who had completed their initial treatment and were expected to survive for at least 3 months.InterventionNurse led follow up of outpatients compared with conventional medical follow up.ResultsPatient acceptability of nurse led follow up was high: 75% (203/271) of eligible patients consented to participate. Patients who received the intervention had less severe dyspnoea at 3 months (P=0.03) and had better scores for emotional functioning (P=0.03) and less peripheral neuropathy (P=0.05) at 12 months. Intervention group patients scored significantly better in most satisfaction subscales at 3, 6, and 12 months (P<0.01 for all subscales at 3 months). No significant differences in general practitioners'' overall satisfaction were seen between the two groups. No differences were seen in survival or rates of objective progression, although nurses recorded progression of symptoms sooner than doctors (P=0.01). Intervention patients were more likely to die at home rather than in a hospital or hospice (P=0.04), attended fewer consultations with a hospital doctor during the first 3 months (P=0.004), had fewer radiographs during the first 6 months (P=0.04), and had more radiotherapy within the first 3 months (P=0.01). No other differences were seen between the two groups in terms of the use of resources.ConclusionNurse led follow up was acceptable to lung cancer patients and general practitioners and led to positive outcomes.

What is already known on this topic

Most patients with cancer are routinely seen in outpatient clinics for many years despite lack of evidence of effectivenessDoctors and nurses often fail to detect patients'' emotional distress, and patients have little time to raise concerns

What this study adds

Follow up of patients with lung cancer by clinical nurse specialists is safe, acceptable, and cost effectiveBoth patients and general practitioners were highly satisfied with the nurse led model of follow up     

Patient non-attendance at urgent referral appointments for suspected cancer and its links to cancer diagnosis and one year mortality: A cohort study of patients referred on the Two Week Wait pathway

BackgroundThe ‘Two Week Wait’ policy aims to ensure patients with suspected cancer are seen within two weeks of referral. However, patient non-attendance can result in this target being missed. This study aimed to identify predictors of non-attendance; and analyse the relationship between attendance and outcomes including cancer diagnosis and early mortality.MethodsA cohort study of 109,433 adults registered at 105 general practices, referred to a cancer centre within a large NHS hospital trust (April 2009 to December 2016) on the ‘Two Week Wait’ pathway.Results5673 (5.2%) patients did not attend. Non-attendance was largely predicted by patient factors (younger and older age, male gender, greater deprivation, suspected cancer site, earlier year of referral, greater distance to the hospital) over practice factors (greater deprivation, lower Quality and Outcomes Framework score, lower cancer conversion rate, lower cancer detection rate). 10,360 (9.6%) patients were diagnosed with cancer within six months of referral (9.8% attending patients, 5.6% non-attending patients). Among these patients, 2029 (19.6%) died within 12 months of diagnosis: early mortality risk was 31.3% in non-attenders and 19.2% in attending patients.ConclusionsNon-attendance at urgent referral appointments for suspected cancer involves a minority of patients but happens in predictable groups. Cancer diagnosis was less likely in non-attending patients but these patients had worse early mortality outcomes than attending patients. The study findings have implications for cancer services and policy.     

Gene Expression Profile for Predicting Survival in Advanced-Stage Serous Ovarian Cancer Across Two Independent Datasets

Background

Advanced-stage ovarian cancer patients are generally treated with platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy after primary debulking surgery. However, there is a wide range of outcomes for individual patients. Therefore, the clinicopathological factors alone are insufficient for predicting prognosis. Our aim is to identify a progression-free survival (PFS)-related molecular profile for predicting survival of patients with advanced-stage serous ovarian cancer.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Advanced-stage serous ovarian cancer tissues from 110 Japanese patients who underwent primary surgery and platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy were profiled using oligonucleotide microarrays. We selected 88 PFS-related genes by a univariate Cox model (p<0.01) and generated the prognostic index based on 88 PFS-related genes after adjustment of regression coefficients of the respective genes by ridge regression Cox model using 10-fold cross-validation. The prognostic index was independently associated with PFS time compared to other clinical factors in multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR), 3.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.66–5.43; p<0.0001]. In an external dataset, multivariate analysis revealed that this prognostic index was significantly correlated with PFS time (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.20–1.98; p = 0.0008). Furthermore, the correlation between the prognostic index and overall survival time was confirmed in the two independent external datasets (log rank test, p = 0.0010 and 0.0008).

Conclusions/Significance

The prognostic ability of our index based on the 88-gene expression profile in ridge regression Cox hazard model was shown to be independent of other clinical factors in predicting cancer prognosis across two distinct datasets. Further study will be necessary to improve predictive accuracy of the prognostic index toward clinical application for evaluation of the risk of recurrence in patients with advanced-stage serous ovarian cancer.     

Influence of hospital and clinician workload on survival from colorectal cancer: cohort study

ObjectiveTo determine whether clinician or hospital caseload affects mortality from colorectal cancer.DesignCohort study of cases ascertained between 1990 and 1994 by a region-wide colorectal cancer register.ResultsOf the 3217 new patients registered over the period, 1512 (48%) died before 31 December 1996. Strong predictors of survival both in a logistic regression (fixed follow up) and in a Cox''s proportional hazards model (variable follow up) were Duke''s stage, the degree of tumour differentiation, whether the liver was deemed clear of cancer by the surgeon at operation, and the type of intervention (elective or emergency and curative or palliative intent). In a multilevel model, surgeon’s caseload had no significant effect on mortality at 2 years. Hospital workload, however, had a significant impact on survival. The odds ratio for death within 2 years for cases managed in a hospital with a caseload of between 33 and 46 cases per year, 47 and 54 cases per year, and ⩾55 cases per year (compared to one with ≤23 cases per year) were respectively 1.48 (95% confidence interval 1.03 to 2.13), 1.52 (1.08 to 2.13), and 1.18 (0.83 to 1.68).ConclusionsThere was no detectable caseload effect for surgeons managing colorectal cancer, but survival of patients treated in hospitals with caseloads above 33 cases per year was slightly worse than for those treated in hospitals with fewer caseloads. Imprecise measurement of clinician specific “events rates” and the lack of routinely collected case mix data present major challenges for clinical audit and governance in the years ahead.

Key messages

• Various benefits have been described for multidisciplinary cancer care, but the precise relation between a surgeon''s or hospital''s caseload and the outcome for the patient is not known
• Any investigation of a caseload effect at the hospital or practitioner level has to simultaneously account for each factor and adjust adequately for case mix
• Surgeon had no significant effect on caseload, but patients treated in hospitals with low caseloads (<33 cases per year) had a slightly better survival at 2 years than those treated in hospitals with a higher caseload
• Defining surgical expertise in terms of volume of activity may be a misdirected and imprecise yardstick for the quality of cancer care; other aspects of the organisation of services may be far more important

     

Randomised controlled trial of Helicobacter pylori testing and endoscopy for dyspepsia in primary care

ObjectiveTo determine the cost effectiveness of a strategy of near patient Helicobacter pylori testing and endoscopy for managing dyspepsia.DesignRandomised controlled trial.Setting31 UK primary care centres.Participants478 patients under 50 years old presenting with dyspepsia of longer than four weeks duration.InterventionsNear patient testing for H pylori and open access endoscopy for patients with positive results. Control patients received acid suppressing drugs or specialist referral at general practitioner''s discretion.Results40% of the study group tested positive for H pylori. 45% of study patients had endoscopy compared with 25% of controls. More peptic ulcers were diagnosed in the study group (7.4% v 2.1%, P=0.011). Paired comparison of symptom scores and quality of life showed that all patients improved over time with no difference between study and control groups. No significant differences were observed in rates of prescribing, consultation, or referral. Costs were higher in the study group (£367.85 v £253.16 per patient).ConclusionsThe test and endoscopy strategy increases endoscopy rates over usual practice in primary care. The additional cost is not offset by benefits in symptom relief or quality of life.

What is already known on this topic

Patients younger than 50 without H pylori infection are unlikely to have treatable disease detected at endoscopySuch patients can be managed by acid suppression and reassurance aloneTest and endoscopy (referral of patients testing positive for H pylori in primary care) has been recommended as a way to reduce endoscopic workload

What this paper adds

Applying a test and endoscopy strategy increased the endoscopy referral rate from 25% to 40%The strategy produced no significant differences in symptoms or quality of life compared with usual managementThe increased costs of this strategy cannot be justified     

Injection with methylprednisolone proximal to the carpal tunnel: randomised double blind trial

ObjectiveTo assess the effect of a 40 mg methylprednisolone injection proximal to the carpal tunnel in patients with the carpal tunnel syndrome.DesignRandomised double blind placebo controlled trial. SettingOutpatient neurology clinic in a district general hospital.ParticipantsPatients with symptoms of the carpal tunnel syndrome for more than 3 months, confirmed by electrophysiological tests and aged over 18 years.InterventionInjection with 10 mg lignocaine (lidocaine) or 10 mg lignocaine and 40 mg methylprednisolone. Non-responders who had received lignocaine received 40 mg methylprednisolone and 10 mg lignocaine and were followed in an open study.ResultsAt 1 month 6 (20%) of 30 patients in the control group had improved compared with 23 (77%) of 30 patients the intervention group (difference 57% (95% confidence interval 36% to 77%)). After 1 year, 2 of 6 improved patients in the control group did not need a second treatment, compared with 15 of 23 improved patients in the intervention group (difference 43% (23% to 63%). Of the 28 non-responders in the control group, 24 (86%) improved after methylprednisolone. Of these 24 patients, 12 needed surgical treatment within one year.ConclusionA single injection with steroids close to the carpal tunnel may result in long term improvement and should be considered before surgical decompression.

Key messages

• Corticosteroid injections into the carpal tunnel may damage the nerve, and any treatment benefits may be of short duration
• A single injection with steroids proximal to the carpal tunnel improves 77% of patients with the carpal tunnel syndrome at one month after treatment
• This single injection is still effective at one year in half of the patients
• Injections proximal to the carpal tunnel have no side effects and are easier to carry out than injections into the carpal tunnel

     

Career destinations seven years on among doctors who qualified in the United Kingdom in 1988: postal questionnaire survey

ObjectiveTo report the career choices and career destinations in 1995 of doctors who qualified in the United Kingdom in 1988.DesignPostal questionnaire.SettingUnited Kingdom.SubjectsAll doctors who qualified in the United Kingdom in 1988.ResultsOf the 3724 doctors who were sent questionnaires, eight had died and three declined to participate. Of the remaining 3713 doctors, 2885 (77.7%) replied. 16.9% (608/3593; 95% confidence interval 16.1% to 17.8%) of all 1988 qualifiers from medical schools in Great Britain were not working in the NHS in Great Britain in 1995 compared with 17.0% (624/3674; 16.1% to 17.9%) of the 1983 cohort in 1990. The proportion of doctors working in general practice was lower than in previous cohorts. The percentage of women in general practice (44.3% (528/1192)) substantially exceeded that of men (33.1% (443/1340)). 53% (276/522) of the women in general practice and 20% (98/490) of the women in hospital specialties worked part time.ConclusionsConcerns about recruitment difficulties in general practice are justified. Women are now entering general practice in greater numbers than men. There is no evidence of a greater exodus from the NHS from the 1988 qualifiers than from earlier cohorts.

Key messages

• This study reports the career progress to September 1995 of doctors who qualified in 1988
• Loss from the British NHS, at 16.9% (95% confidence interval, 16.1% to 17.8%), was no greater than among earlier qualifiers at the same time after qualification
• The proportion of doctors working in general practice (38%) was lower than in earlier cohorts studied
• In this generation of doctors, women in general practice now outnumber men
• Fifty three per cent of the women in general practice and 20% of the women in hospital specialties were working on a part time or flexible basis

     

Prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure in high risk patients: community based epidemiological study

ObjectivesTo determine the prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and of heart failure due to different causes, in patients with risk factors for these conditions.DesignEpidemiological study, including detailed clinical assessment, electrocardiography, and echocardiography.Setting16 English general practices, representative for socioeconomic status and practice type.Participants1062 patients (66% response rate) with previous myocardial infarction, angina, hypertension, or diabetes.ResultsDefinite systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction <40%) was found in 54/244 (22.1%, 95% confidence interval 17.1% to 27.9%) patients with previous myocardial infarction, 26/321 (8.1%, 5.4% to 11.6%) with angina, 7/388 (1.8%, 0.7% to 3.7%) with hypertension, and 12/208 (5.8%, 3.0% to 9.9%) with diabetes. In each group, approximately half of these patients had symptoms of dyspnoea, and therefore had heart failure. Overall rates of heart failure, defined as symptoms of dyspnoea plus objective evidence of cardiac dysfunction (systolic dysfunction, atrial fibrillation, or clinically significant valve disease) were 16.0% (11.6% to 21.2%) in patients with previous myocardial infarction, 8.4% (5.6% to 12.0%) in those with angina, 2.8% (1.4% to 5.0%) in those with hypertension, and 7.7% (4.5% to 12.2%) in those with diabetes.ConclusionMany people with ischaemic heart disease or diabetes have systolic dysfunction or heart failure. The data support the need for trials of targeted echocardiographic screening, in view of the major benefits of modern treatment. In contrast, patients with uncomplicated hypertension have similar rates to the general population.

What is already known on this topic

The prognosis and symptoms of patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure can be greatly improved by modern treatmentsMany patients with heart failure do not have an assessment of left ventricular function, resulting in undertreatment of the condition

What this study adds

Patients with a history of ischaemic heart disease (especially those with previous myocardial infarction) or diabetes commonly have left ventricular systolic dysfunctionThese patients would be candidates for a targeted echocardiographic screening programmeIn contrast, the yield from screening patients with uncomplicated hypertension would be low