A new proofreading mechanism for lesion bypass by DNA polymerase-λ

Replicative DNA polymerases (DNA pols) increase their fidelity by removing misincorporated nucleotides with their 3' → 5' exonuclease activity. Exonuclease activity reduces translesion synthesis (TLS) efficiency and TLS DNA pols lack 3' → 5' exonuclease activity. Here we show that physiological concentrations of pyrophosphate (PP(i)) activate the pyrophosphorolytic activity by DNA pol-λ, allowing the preferential excision of the incorrectly incorporated A opposite a 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine lesion, or T opposite a 6-methyl-guanine, with respect to the correct C. This is the first example of an alternative proofreading mechanism used during TLS.     

Translesion synthesis in Escherichia coli: lessons from the NarI mutation hot spot

Duplication of DNA containing damaged bases is a challenge to DNA polymerases that normally replicate with high speed, high accuracy and high processivity undamaged templates only. When a replicative DNA polymerase encounters a chemically altered base that it is unable to copy, a process called translesion synthesis (TLS) takes place during which the replicative polymerase is transiently replaced by a so-called specialized or lesion bypass polymerase. In addition to the central players that are the replicative and translesion DNA polymerases, TLS pathways involve accessory factors such as the general replication processivity factor (i.e. the beta-clamp in prokaryotes and PCNA in eukaryotes). In Escherichia coli, besides the beta-clamp, RecA plays a fundamental role as a co-factor of Pol V the major bypass polymerase in this organism. An integrated view of TLS pathways necessarily requires both genetic and biochemical studies. In this review we will attempt to summarize the insights into TLS gained over the last 25 years by studying a frameshift mutation hot spot, the NarI site. This site was initially discovered by serendipity when establishing a forward mutation spectrum induced by a chemical hepatocarcinogen, N-2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF). Indeed, this chemical carcinogen covalently binds to DNA forming adducts with guanine residues. When bound to G* in the NarI site, 5'-GGCG*CC-, AAF induces the loss of the G*pC dinucleotide at a frequency that is approximately 10(7)-fold higher than the spontaneous frequency. In vivo studies showed that the NarI mutation hot spot is neither restricted to the NarI sequence itself, nor to the carcinogen AAF. Instead, the hot spot requires a sequence containing at least two GpC repeats and any of a family of aromatic amides and nitro aromatic compounds that form a large class of human carcinogens. Genetic analysis initially revealed that the NarI frameshift pathway is SOS dependent but umuDC (i.e. Pol V) independent. More recently, DNA Pol II was identified as the enzyme responsible of this frameshift pathway. Concurrently the AAF adduct in the NarI site can be bypassed in an error-free way by Pol V. The NarI site thus offers a unique possibility to study the interplay between two specialized DNA polymerases, Pol II and Pol V, that can both extend replication intermediates formed when the replicative Pol III dissociates in the vicinity of the damage. Full reconstitution of the two pathways led us to highlight a key feature for TLS pathways, namely that it is critical the specialized DNA polymerase synthesizes, during the course of a single binding event, a patch of DNA synthesis (TLS patch) that is long enough as to "hide the lesion induced distortion" from the proofreading activity upon reloading of the replicative DNA polymerase (or any exonuclease that may get access to the primer when the specialized DNA polymerase detaches). The beta-clamp, to which all DNA polymerases bind, plays a critical role in allowing the specialized DNA polymerases to synthesize TLS patches that are long enough to resist such "external proofreading" activities.     

DNA polymerase mutagenic bypass and proofreading of endogenous DNA lesions

DNA polymerases differentiate between correct and incorrect substrates during synthesis on undamaged DNA templates through the biochemical steps of base incorporation, primer-template extension and proofreading excision. Recent research examining DNA polymerase processing of abasic, alkylation and oxidative lesions is reviewed in light of these discrimination mechanisms. Inhibition of DNA synthesis results from correct polymerase discrimination against utilization of geometrically incorrect template bases or 3' terminal basepairs. The efficiency of translesion synthesis is thus related to the physical structure of the lesion containing DNA. However, variations in enzyme structure and kinetics result in translesion synthesis efficiencies that are also dependent upon the DNA polymerase. With a low probability, polymerase misinsertion events create a 3' lesion terminus which is geometrically favored over the correct lesion basepair, resulting in mutagenic translesion synthesis. For example, both polymerase alpha and polymerase beta appear to require the formation of a stable 3' primer-template structure for efficient abasic site translesion synthesis. However, the enzymes differ as to the precise molecular make-up of the stable DNA structure, resulting in different mutational specificities. Similar mechanisms may be applicable to oxidative damage, where mutational specificities dependent upon the DNA polymerase also have been observed. In vitro reaction conditions also influence DNA polymerase processing of lesions. Using an in vitro herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) gene forward mutation assay, we demonstrate that high dNTP substrate concentrations affect the mutagenic specificity of translesion synthesis using alkylated templates. The exonuclease-deficient Klenow polymerase error frequency for G-->A transition mutations using templates modified by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) was four-fold higher at 1000 microM [dNTP], relative to 50 microM [dNTP], consistent with an increased efficiency of extension of the etO6G.T mispair. Moreover, the frequency of other ENU-induced polymerase errors was suppressed when polymerase reactions contained 50 microM dNTP, relative to 1000 microM dNTP. The efficiency of proofreading as a polymerase error discrimination mechanism reflects a balance between the competing processes of 3'-->5' exonuclease removal of mispairs and polymerization of the next correct nucleotide. Polymerases that are devoid of a proofreading exonuclease generally display enhanced abasic site translesion synthesis relative to proofreading-proficient enzymes. In addition, the proofreading exonucleases of Escherichia coli Pol I and T4 DNA polymerases have been found to remove mispairs caused by abasic sites and oxidative lesions, respectively, resulting in lowered polymerase error rates. However, the magnitude of the exonuclease effect is small (less than 10-fold), and highly dependent upon the DNA polymerase-exonuclease. We have studied proofreading exonuclease removal of alkylation damage in the HSV-tk forward assay. We observed no significant reduction in the magnitude of the mutant frequency vs. dose-response curves when N-methyl-N-nitrosourea or ENU-treated templates were used in exonuclease-proficient Klenow polymerase reactions, as compared to the exonuclease-deficient polymerase reactions. Thus, available data suggest that proofreading excision of endogenous lesion mispairs does occur, but the efficiency is dependent upon the lesion and the DNA polymerase-exonuclease studied.     

The proofreading 3'-->5' exonuclease activity of DNA polymerases: a kinetic barrier to translesion DNA synthesis

The 3'-->5' exonuclease activity intrinsic to several DNA polymerases plays a primary role in genetic stability; it acts as a first line of defense in correcting DNA polymerase errors. A mismatched basepair at the primer terminus is the preferred substrate for the exonuclease activity over a correct basepair. The efficiency of the exonuclease as a proofreading activity for mispairs containing a DNA lesion varies, however, being dependent upon both the DNA polymerase/exonuclease and the type of DNA lesion. The exonuclease activities intrinsic to the T4 polymerase (family B) and DNA polymerase gamma (family A) proofread DNA mispairs opposite endogenous DNA lesions, including alkylation, oxidation, and abasic adducts. However, the exonuclease of the Klenow polymerase cannot discriminate between correct and incorrect bases opposite alkylation and oxidative lesions. DNA damage alters the dynamics of the intramolecular partitioning of DNA substrates between the 3'-->5' exonuclease and polymerase activities. Enzymatic idling at lesions occurs when an exonuclease activity efficiently removes the same base that is preferentially incorporated by the DNA polymerase activity. Thus, the exonuclease activity can also act as a kinetic barrier to translesion synthesis (TLS) by preventing the stable incorporation of bases opposite DNA lesions. Understanding the downstream consequences of exonuclease activity at DNA lesions is necessary for elucidating the mechanisms of translesion synthesis and damage-induced cytotoxicity.     

Defining the position of the switches between replicative and bypass DNA polymerases

Cells contain specialized DNA polymerases that are able to copy past lesions with an associated risk of generating mutations, the major cause of cancer. Here, we reconstitute translesion synthesis (TLS) using the replicative (Pol III) and major bypass (Pol V) DNA polymerases from Escherichia coli in the presence of accessory factors. When the replicative polymerase disconnects from the template in the vicinity of a lesion, Pol V binds the blocked replication intermediate and forms a stable complex by means of a dual interaction with the tip of the RecA filament and the beta-clamp, the processivity factor donated by the blocked Pol III holoenzyme. Both interactions are required to confer to Pol V the processivity that will allow it synthesize, in a single binding event, a TLS patch long enough to support further extension by Pol III. In the absence of these accessory factors, the patch synthesized by Pol V is too short, being degraded by the Pol III-associated exonuclease activity that senses the distortion induced by the lesion, thus leading to an aborted bypass process.     

Translesion Synthesis of Abasic Sites by Yeast DNA Polymerase ?

Studies of replicative DNA polymerases have led to the generalization that abasic sites are strong blocks to DNA replication. Here we show that yeast replicative DNA polymerase ϵ bypasses a model abasic site with comparable efficiency to Pol η and Dpo4, two translesion polymerases. DNA polymerase ϵ also exhibited high bypass efficiency with a natural abasic site on the template. Translesion synthesis primarily resulted in deletions. In cases where only a single nucleotide was inserted, dATP was the preferred nucleotide opposite the natural abasic site. In contrast to translesion polymerases, DNA polymerase ϵ with 3′–5′ proofreading exonuclease activity bypasses only the model abasic site during processive synthesis and cannot reinitiate DNA synthesis. This characteristic may allow other pathways to rescue leading strand synthesis when stalled at an abasic site.     

Interaction of DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment) with DNA substrates containing extrahelical bases: implications for proofreading of frameshift errors during DNA synthesis

Frameshift mutagenesis occurs through the misalignment of primer and template strands during DNA synthesis and involves DNA intermediates that contain one or more extrahelical bases in either strand of the DNA substrate. To investigate whether these DNA structures are recognized by the proofreading apparatus of DNA polymerases, time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy was used to examine the interaction between the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I and synthetic DNA primer-templates containing extrahelical bases at defined positions within the template strand. A dansyl probe attached to the DNA was used to measure the fractional occupancies of the polymerase and 3'-5' exonuclease sites of the enzyme for DNA substrates with and without the extrahelical bases. The presence of an extrahelical base at the first position from the primer 3' terminus increased the level of partitioning of the DNA substrates into the 3'-5' exonuclease site by 3-7-fold, relative to the perfectly base-paired primer-template, depending on the identity of the extrahelical base. The ability of different extrahelical bases to promote partitioning of DNA into the 3'-5' exonuclease site decreased in the following order: G > A approximately T > C. The results of partitioning measurements for DNA substrates containing a bulged adenine base at different positions within the template showed that an extrahelical base is recognized up to five bases from the primer 3' terminus. The largest effects were observed for the extrahelical base at the third or fourth positions from the primer terminus, which increased the level of partitioning of DNA into the 3'-5' exonuclease site by 8- and 18-fold, respectively, relative to that of the perfectly base-paired substrate. Steady-state fluorescence measurements of analogous primer-templates containing 2-aminopurine (AP) at the primer 3' terminus indicate that extrahelical bases increase the degree of terminus unwinding, especially when close to the terminus. In addition, steady-state kinetic measurements of removal of AP from the primer-templates indicate that the exonucleolytic cleavage activity of Klenow fragment is correlated with the increased level of partitioning of bulged DNA substrates to the 3'-5' exonuclease site relative to that of properly base-paired DNA. The results of this study indicate that misalignment of primer and template strands to generate an extrahelical base strongly promotes transfer of a DNA substrate to the 3'-5' exonuclease site, suggesting that the premutational intermediates in frameshift mutagenesis are subject to proofreading by the polymerase.     

The proofreading 3′→5′ exonuclease activity of DNA polymerases: a kinetic barrier to translesion DNA synthesis

The 3′→5′ exonuclease activity intrinsic to several DNA polymerases plays a primary role in genetic stability; it acts as a first line of defense in correcting DNA polymerase errors. A mismatched basepair at the primer terminus is the preferred substrate for the exonuclease activity over a correct basepair. The efficiency of the exonuclease as a proofreading activity for mispairs containing a DNA lesion varies, however, being dependent upon both the DNA polymerase/exonuclease and the type of DNA lesion. The exonuclease activities intrinsic to the T4 polymerase (family B) and DNA polymerase γ (family A) proofread DNA mispairs opposite endogenous DNA lesions, including alkylation, oxidation, and abasic adducts. However, the exonuclease of the Klenow polymerase cannot discriminate between correct and incorrect bases opposite alkylation and oxidative lesions. DNA damage alters the dynamics of the intramolecular partitioning of DNA substrates between the 3′→5′ exonuclease and polymerase activities. Enzymatic idling at lesions occurs when an exonuclease activity efficiently removes the same base that is preferentially incorporated by the DNA polymerase activity. Thus, the exonuclease activity can also act as a kinetic barrier to translesion synthesis (TLS) by preventing the stable incorporation of bases opposite DNA lesions. Understanding the downstream consequences of exonuclease activity at DNA lesions is necessary for elucidating the mechanisms of translesion synthesis and damage-induced cytotoxicity.     

Primer-terminus stabilization at the 3'-5' exonuclease active site of phi29 DNA polymerase. Involvement of two amino acid residues highly conserved in proofreading DNA polymerases.

By site-directed mutagenesis in phi29 DNA polymerase, we have analyzed the functional importance of two evolutionarily conserved residues belonging to the 3'-5' exonuclease domain of DNA-dependent DNA polymerases. In Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I, these residues are Thr358 and Asn420, shown by crystallographic analysis to be directly acting as single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) ligands at the 3'-5' exonuclease active site. On the basis of these structural data, single substitution of the corresponding residues of phi29 DNA polymerase, Thr15 and Asn62, produced enzymes with a very reduced or altered capacity to bind ssDNA. Analysis of the residual 3'-5' exonuclease activity of these mutant derivatives on ssDNA substrates allowed us to conclude that these two residues do not play a direct role in the catalysis of the reaction. On the other hand, analysis of the 3'-5' exonuclease activity on either matched or mismatched primer/template structures showed a critical role of these two highly conserved residues in exonucleolysis under polymerization conditions, i.e. in the proofreading of DNA polymerization errors, an evolutionary advantage of most DNA-dependent DNA polymerases. Moreover, in contrast to the dual role in 3'-5' exonucleolysis and strand displacement previously observed for phi29 DNA polymerase residues acting as metal ligands, the contribution of residues Thr15 and Asn62 appears to be restricted to the proofreading function, by stabilization of the frayed primer-terminus at the 3'-5' exonuclease active site.     

Replisome-mediated Translesion Synthesis and Leading Strand Template Lesion Skipping Are Competing Bypass Mechanisms

A number of different enzymatic pathways have evolved to ensure that DNA replication can proceed past template base damage. These pathways include lesion skipping by the replisome, replication fork regression followed by either correction of the damage and origin-independent replication restart or homologous recombination-mediated restart of replication downstream of the lesion, and bypass of the damage by a translesion synthesis DNA polymerase. We report here that of two translesion synthesis polymerases tested, only DNA polymerase IV, not DNA polymerase II, could engage productively with the Escherichia coli replisome to bypass leading strand template damage, despite the fact that both enzymes are shown to be interacting with the replicase. Inactivation of the 3′ → 5′ proofreading exonuclease of DNA polymerase II did not enable bypass. Bypass by DNA polymerase IV required its ability to interact with the β clamp and act as a translesion polymerase but did not require its “little finger” domain, a secondary region of interaction with the β clamp. Bypass by DNA polymerase IV came at the expense of the inherent leading strand lesion skipping activity of the replisome, indicating that they are competing reactions.     

Multiple solutions to inefficient lesion bypass by T7 DNA polymerase

We hypothesize that enzymatic switching during translesion synthesis (TLS) to relieve stalled replication forks occurs during transitions from preferential to disfavored use of damaged primer-templates, and that the polymerase or 3'-exonuclease used for each successive nucleotide incorporated is the one whose properties result in the highest efficiency and the highest fidelity of bypass. Testing this hypothesis requires quantitative determination of the relative lesion bypass ability of both TLS polymerases and major replicative polymerases. As a model of the latter, here we measure the efficiency and fidelity of cis-syn TT dimer and abasic site bypass using the structurally well-characterized T7 DNA polymerase. No bypass of either lesion occurred during a single round of synthesis, and the exonuclease activity of wild-type T7 DNA polymerase was critical in preventing TLS. When repetitive cycling of the exonuclease-deficient enzyme was allowed, limited bypass did occur but hundreds to thousands of cycles were required to achieve even a single bypass event. Analysis of TLS fidelity indicated that these rare bypass events involved rearrangements of the template and primer strands, insertions opposite the lesion, and combinations of these events, with the choice among these strongly depending on the sequence context of the lesion. Moreover, the presence of a lesion affected the fidelity of copying adjacent undamaged template bases, even when lesion bypass itself was correct. The results also indicate that a TT dimer presents a different type of block to the polymerase than an abasic site, even though both lesions are extremely potent blocks to processive synthesis. The approaches used here to quantify the efficiency and fidelity of TLS can be applied to other polymerase-lesion combinations, to provide guidance as to which of many possible polymerases is most likely to bypass various lesions in biological contexts.     

Mechanism of DNA damage tolerance

DNA damage may compromise genome integrity and lead to cell death. Cells have evolved a variety of processes to respond to DNA damage including damage repair and tolerance mechanisms, as well as damage checkpoints. The DNA damage tolerance(DDT) pathway promotes the bypass of single-stranded DNA lesions encountered by DNA polymerases during DNA replication. This prevents the stalling of DNA replication. Two mechanistically distinct DDT branches have been characterized. One is translesion synthesis(TLS) in which a replicative DNA polymerase is temporarily replaced by a specialized TLS polymerase that has the ability to replicate across DNA lesions. TLS is mechanistically simple and straightforward, but it is intrinsically error-prone. The other is the error-free template switching(TS) mechanism in which the stalled nascent strand switches from the damaged template to the undamaged newly synthesized sister strand for extension past the lesion. Error-free TS is a complex but preferable process for bypassing DNA lesions. However, our current understanding of this pathway is sketchy. An increasing number of factors are being found to participate or regulate this important mechanism, which is the focus of this editorial.     

Trading places: how do DNA polymerases switch during translesion DNA synthesis?

The replicative bypass of base damage in DNA (translesion DNA synthesis [TLS]) is a ubiquitous mechanism for relieving arrested DNA replication. The process requires multiple polymerase switching events during which the high-fidelity DNA polymerase in the replication machinery arrested at the primer terminus is replaced by one or more polymerases that are specialized for TLS. When replicative bypass is fully completed, the primer terminus is once again occupied by high-fidelity polymerases in the replicative machinery. This review addresses recent advances in our understanding of DNA polymerase switching during TLS in bacteria such as E. coli and in lower and higher eukaryotes.     

Fidelity of DNA polymerase epsilon holoenzyme from budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DNA polymerases delta and epsilon (pol delta and epsilon) are the major replicative polymerases and possess 3'-5' proofreading exonuclease activities that correct errors arising during DNA replication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. This study measures the fidelity of the holoenzyme of wild-type pol epsilon, the 3'-5' exonuclease-deficient pol2-4, a +1 frameshift mutator for homonucleotide runs, pol2C1089Y, and pol2C1089Y pol2-4 enzymes using a synthetic 30-mer primer/100-mer template. The nucleotide substitution rate for wild-type pol epsilon was 0.47 x 10(-5) for G:G mismatches, 0.15 x 10(-5) for T:G mismatches, and less than 0.01 x 10(-5) for A:G mismatches. The accuracy for A opposite G was not altered in the exonuclease-deficient pol2-4 pol epsilon; however, G:G and T:G misincorporation rates increased 40- and 73-fold, respectively. The pol2C1089Y pol epsilon mutant also exhibited increased G:G and T:G misincorporation rates, 22- and 10-fold, respectively, whereas A:G misincorporation did not differ from that of wild type. Since the fidelity of the double mutant pol2-4 pol2C1089Y was not greatly decreased, these results suggest that the proofreading 3'-5' exonuclease activity of pol2C1089Y pol epsilon is impaired even though it retains nuclease activity and the mutation is not in the known exonuclease domain.     

Caught bending the A-rule: crystal structures of translesion DNA synthesis with a non-natural nucleotide

Damage to DNA involving excision of the nucleobase at the N-glycosidic bond forms abasic sites. If a nucleotide becomes incorporated opposite an unrepaired abasic site during DNA synthesis, most B family polymerases obey the A-rule and preferentially incorporate dAMP without instruction from the template. In addition to being potentially mutagenic, abasic sites provide strong blocks to DNA synthesis. A previous crystal structure of an exonuclease deficient variant of the replicative B family DNA polymerase from bacteriophage RB69 (RB69 gp43 exo-) illustrated these properties, showing that the polymerase failed to translocate the DNA following insertion of dAMP opposite an abasic site. We examine four new structures depicting several steps of translesion DNA synthesis by RB69 gp43 exo-, employing a non-natural purine triphosphate analogue, 5-nitro-1-indolyl-2'-deoxyriboside-5'-triphosphate (5-NITP), that is incorporated more efficiently than dAMP opposite abasic sites. Our structures indicate that a dipole-induced dipole stacking interaction between the 5-nitro group and base 3' to the templating lesion explains the enhanced kinetics of 5-NITP. As with dAMP, the DNA fails to translocate following insertion of 5-NIMP, although distortions at the nascent primer terminus contribute less than previously thought in inducing the stall, given that 5-NIMP preserves relatively undistorted geometry at the insertion site following phosphoryl transfer. An open ternary configuration, novel in B family polymerases, reveals an initial template independent binding of 5-NITP adjacent to the active site of the open polymerase, suggesting that closure of the fingers domain shuttles the nucleotide to the active site while testing the substrate against the template.     

Xeroderma pigmentosum variant and error-prone DNA polymerases

Replicative DNA synthesis is a faithful event which requires undamaged DNA and high fidelity DNA polymerases. If unrepaired damage remains in the template DNA during replication, specialised low fidelity DNA polymerases synthesises DNA past lesions (translesion synthesis, TLS). Current evidence suggests that the polymerase switch from replicative to translesion polymerases might be mediated by post-translational modifications involving ubiquitination processes. One of these TLS polymerases, polymerase eta carries out TLS past UV photoproducts and is deficient in the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum (XP-V). The dramatic proneness to skin cancer of XP-V individuals highlights the importance of this DNA polymerase in cancer avoidance. The UV hypermutability of XP-V cells suggests that, in the absence of a functional poleta, UV-induced lesions are bypassed by inaccurate DNA polymerase(s) which remain to be identified.     

Def1 Promotes the Degradation of Pol3 for Polymerase Exchange to Occur During DNA-Damage–Induced Mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DNA damages hinder the advance of replication forks because of the inability of the replicative polymerases to synthesize across most DNA lesions. Because stalled replication forks are prone to undergo DNA breakage and recombination that can lead to chromosomal rearrangements and cell death, cells possess different mechanisms to ensure the continuity of replication on damaged templates. Specialized, translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases can take over synthesis at DNA damage sites. TLS polymerases synthesize DNA with a high error rate and are responsible for damage-induced mutagenesis, so their activity must be strictly regulated. However, the mechanism that allows their replacement of the replicative polymerase is unknown. Here, using protein complex purification and yeast genetic tools, we identify Def1 as a key factor for damage-induced mutagenesis in yeast. In in vivo experiments we demonstrate that upon DNA damage, Def1 promotes the ubiquitylation and subsequent proteasomal degradation of Pol3, the catalytic subunit of the replicative polymerase δ, whereas Pol31 and Pol32, the other two subunits of polymerase δ, are not affected. We also show that purified Pol31 and Pol32 can form a complex with the TLS polymerase Rev1. Our results imply that TLS polymerases carry out DNA lesion bypass only after the Def1-assisted removal of Pol3 from the stalled replication fork.