Dynamics of mammalian NER proteins

Despite detailed knowledge on the genetic network and biochemical properties of most of the nucleotide excision repair (NER) proteins, cell biological analysis has only recently made it possible to investigate the temporal and spatial organization of NER. In contrast to several other DNA damage response mechanisms that occur in specific subnuclear structures, NER is not confined to nuclear foci, which has severely hampered the analysis of its arrangement in time and space. In this review the recently developed tools to study the dynamic molecular transactions between the NER factors and the chromatin template are summarized. First, different procedures to inflict DNA damage in a part of the cell nucleus are discussed. In addition, technologies to measure protein dynamics of NER factors tagged with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) will be reviewed. Most of the dynamic parameters of GFP-tagged NER factors are deduced from different variants of 'fluorescence recovery after photobleaching' (FRAP) experiments and FRAP analysis procedures will be briefly evaluated. The combination of local damage induction, genetic tagging of repair factors with GFP and microscopy innovations have provided the basis for the determination of NER kinetics within living mammalian cells. These new cell biological approaches have disclosed a highly dynamic arrangement of NER factors that assemble in an orderly fashion on damaged DNA. The spatio-temporal analysis tools developed for the study of NER and the kinetic model derived from these studies can serve as a paradigm for the understanding of other chromatin-associated processes.     

Nucleotide excision repair in higher eukaryotes: Mechanism of primary damage recognition

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is one of the major DNA repair pathways in eukaryotic cells. NER removes structurally diverse lesions such as pyrimidine dimers, arising upon UV irradiation, and bulky chemical adducts, arising upon exposure to carcinogens and some chemotherapeutic drugs. NER defects lead to severe diseases, including some forms of cancer. In view of the broad substrate specificity of NER, it is of interest to study how a certain set of proteins recognizes DNA lesions in contest of a large excess of intact DNA. The review focuses on DNA damage recognition, the key and, as yet, most questionable step of NER. The main models of primary damage recognition and preincision complex assembly are considered. The model of a sequential loading of repair proteins on damaged DNA seems most reasonable in light of the available data.     

Regulation of nucleotide excision repair through ubiquitination

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the most versatile DNA-repair pathway in all organisms. While bacteria require only three proteins to complete the incision step of NER, eukaryotes employ about 30 proteins to complete the same step. Here we summarize recent studies demonstrating that ubiquitination, a post-translational modification, plays critical roles in regulating the NER activity either dependent on or independent of ubiquitin-proteolysis. Several NER components have been shown as targets of ubiquitination while others are actively involved in the ubiquitination process. We argue through this analysis that ubiquitination serves to coordinate various steps of NER and meanwhile connect NER with other related pathways to achieve the efficient global DNA-damage response.     

The eukaryotic nucleotide excision repair pathway

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the most versatile mechanism of DNA repair, recognizing and dealing with a variety of helix-distorting lesions, such as the UV-induced photoproducts cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and pyrimidine 6-4 pyrimidone photoproducts (6-4 PPs). In this review, we describe the main protein players and the different sequential steps of the eukaryotic NER mechanism in human cells, from lesion recognition to damage removal and DNA synthesis. Studies on the dynamics of protein access to the damaged site, and the kinetics of lesion removal contribute to the knowledge of how the cells respond to genetic insult. DNA lesions as well as NER factors themselves are also implicated in changes in cell metabolism, influencing cell cycle progression or arrest, apoptosis and genetic instability. These changes are related to increased mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Finally, the recent collection of genomic data allows one to recognize the high conservation and the evolution of eukaryotic NER. The distribution of NER orthologues in different organisms, from archaea to the metazoa, displays challenging observations. Some of NER proteins are widespread in nature, probably representing ancient DNA repair proteins, which are candidates to participate in a primitive NER mechanism.     

Nucleotide excision repair in chromatin: the shape of things to come

Much of our mechanistic understanding of nucleotide excision repair (NER) has been derived from biochemical studies that have analysed the reaction as it occurs on DNA substrates that are not representative of DNA as it exists in the living cell. These studies have been extremely useful in deciphering the core mechanism of the NER reaction, but efforts to understand how NER operates in chromatin have been hampered in part because assembling DNA into nucleosomes, the first level of chromatin compaction, is inhibitory to NER in vitro. However, recent research using biochemical, genetic and cell-based studies is now providing us with the first insights into the molecular mechanism of NER as it occurs in the cellular context. A number of recent studies have provided glimpses of a chromatin--NER connection. Here I review this literature and evaluate how it might aid our understanding, and shape our future research into NER.     

Incision of a 1,3-intrastrand d(GpTpG)-cisplatin adduct by nucleotide excision repair proteins from yeast

The protein machinery responsible for nucleotide excision repair (NER) is highly conserved from yeast to man. NER can be reconstituted with purified proteins, and the incision sites around a defined DNA lesion have been defined to the nucleotide level in a mammalian NER system. Here, we reconstitute NER in yeast whole cell extracts, as well as with partially purified yeast NER components. We show that NER activity can be isolated partly as a large protein complex, and map the sites of nucleotide incision around a cisplatin-induced DNA lesion. Our data indicate that yeast NER proteins excise an oligonucleotide of 23-26 bases containing the DNA lesion (rather than 26-30 bases as in humans), and that the 3' incision occurs around position 17 (rather than at position 9 as in humans).     

Mismatch repair and nucleotide excision repair proteins cooperate in the recognition of DNA interstrand crosslinks

DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) are among the most cytotoxic types of DNA damage, thus ICL-inducing agents such as psoralen, are clinically useful chemotherapeutics. Psoralen-modified triplex-forming oligonucleotides (TFOs) have been used to target ICLs to specific genomic sites to increase the selectivity of these agents. However, how TFO-directed psoralen ICLs (Tdp-ICLs) are recognized and processed in human cells is unclear. Previously, we reported that two essential nucleotide excision repair (NER) protein complexes, XPA–RPA and XPC–RAD23B, recognized ICLs in vitro, and that cells deficient in the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) complex MutSβ were sensitive to psoralen ICLs. To further investigate the role of MutSβ in ICL repair and the potential interaction between proteins from the MMR and NER pathways on these lesions, we performed electrophoretic mobility-shift assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis of MutSβ and NER proteins with Tdp-ICLs. We found that MutSβ bound to Tdp-ICLs with high affinity and specificity in vitro and in vivo, and that MutSβ interacted with XPA–RPA or XPC–RAD23B in recognizing Tdp-ICLs. These data suggest that proteins from the MMR and NER pathways interact in the recognition of ICLs, and provide a mechanistic link by which proteins from multiple repair pathways contribute to ICL repair.     

Nucleotide excision repair: DNA damage recognition and preincision complex assembly

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is one of the major DNA repair pathways in eukaryotic cells counteracting genetic changes caused by DNA damage. NER removes a wide set of structurally diverse lesions such as pyrimidine dimers arising upon UV irradiation and bulky chemical adducts arising upon exposure to carcinogens or chemotherapeutic drugs. NER defects lead to severe diseases including some forms of cancer. In view of the broad substrate specificity of NER, it is of interest to understand how a certain set of proteins recognizes various DNA lesions in the context of a large excess of intact DNA. This review focuses on DNA damage recognition and following stages resulting in preincision complex assembly, the key and still most unclear steps of NER. The major models of primary damage recognition and preincision complex assembly are considered. The contribution of affinity labeling techniques in study of this process is discussed.     

Xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein loads as a separate factor onto DNA lesions

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the main DNA repair pathway in mammals for removal of UV-induced lesions. NER involves the concerted action of more than 25 polypeptides in a coordinated fashion. The xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein (XPA) has been suggested to function as a central organizer and damage verifier in NER. How XPA reaches DNA lesions and how the protein is distributed in time and space in living cells are unknown. Here we studied XPA in vivo by using a cell line stably expressing physiological levels of functional XPA fused to green fluorescent protein and by applying quantitative fluorescence microscopy. The majority of XPA moves rapidly through the nucleoplasm with a diffusion rate different from those of other NER factors tested, arguing against a preassembled XPA-containing NER complex. DNA damage induced a transient ( approximately 5-min) immobilization of maximally 30% of XPA. Immobilization depends on XPC, indicating that XPA is not the initial lesion recognition protein in vivo. Moreover, loading of replication protein A on NER lesions was not dependent on XPA. Thus, XPA participates in NER by incorporation of free diffusing molecules in XPC-dependent NER-DNA complexes. This study supports a model for a rapid consecutive assembly of free NER factors, and a relatively slow simultaneous disassembly, after repair.     

Protein complexes in nucleotide excision repair.

The main pathway by which mammalian cells remove DNA damage caused by UV light and some other mutagens is nucleotide excision repair (NER). The best characterised components of the human NER process are those proteins defective in the inherited disorder xeroderma pigmentosum (XP). The proteins known to be involved in the first steps of the NER reaction (damage recognition and incision-excision) are heterotrimeric RPA, XPA, the 6 to 9 subunit TFIIH, XPC-hHR23B, XPG, and ERCC1-XPF. Many interactions between these proteins have been found in recent years using different methods both in mammalian cells and for the homologous proteins in yeast. There are virtually no quantitative measurements of the relative strengths of these interactions. Higher order associations between these proteins in solution and even the existence of a complete "repairosome" complex have been reported, which would have implications both for the mechanism of repair and for the interplay between NER and other cellular processes. Nevertheless, evidence for a completely pre-assembled functional repairosome in solution is inconclusive and the order of action of repair factors on damaged DNA is uncertain.     

Strong functional interactions of TFIIH with XPC and XPG in human DNA nucleotide excision repair, without a preassembled repairosome

In mammalian cells, the core factors involved in the damage recognition and incision steps of DNA nucleotide excision repair are XPA, TFIIH complex, XPC-HR23B, replication protein A (RPA), XPG, and ERCC1-XPF. Many interactions between these components have been detected, using different physical methods, in human cells and for the homologous factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Several human nucleotide excision repair (NER) complexes, including a high-molecular-mass repairosome complex, have been proposed. However, there have been no measurements of activity of any mammalian NER protein complex isolated under native conditions. In order to assess relative strengths of interactions between NER factors, we captured TFIIH from cell extracts with an anti-cdk7 antibody, retaining TFIIH in active form attached to magnetic beads. Coimmunoprecipitation of other NER proteins was then monitored functionally in a reconstituted repair system with purified proteins. We found that all detectable TFIIH in gently prepared human cell extracts was present in the intact nine-subunit form. There was no evidence for a repair complex that contained all of the NER components. At low ionic strength TFIIH could associate with functional amounts of each NER factor except RPA. At physiological ionic strength, TFIIH associated with significant amounts of XPC-HR23B and XPG but not other repair factors. The strongest interaction was between TFIIH and XPC-HR23B, indicating a coupled role of these proteins in early steps of repair. A panel of antibodies was used to estimate that there are on the order of 10(5) molecules of each core NER factor per HeLa cell.     

DNA bending by the human damage recognition complex XPC-HR23B

Genome integrity is maintained, despite constant assault on DNA, due to the action of a variety of DNA repair pathways. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) protects the genome from the deleterious effects of UV irradiation as well as other agents that induce chemical changes in DNA bases. The mechanistic steps required for eukaryotic NER involve the concerted action of at least six proteins or protein complexes. The specificity to incise only the DNA strand including the damage at defined positions is determined by the coordinated assembly of active protein complexes onto damaged DNA. In order to understand the molecular mechanism of the NER reactions and the origin of this specificity and control we analyzed the architecture of functional NER complexes at nanometer resolution by scanning force microscopy (SFM). In the initial step of damage recognition by XPC-HR23B we observe a protein induced change in DNA conformation. XPC-HR23B induces a bend in DNA upon binding and this is stabilized at the site of damage. We discuss the importance of the XPC-HR23B-induced distortion as an architectural feature that can be exploited for subsequent assembly of an active NER complex.     

Mathematical modeling of nucleotide excision repair reveals efficiency of sequential assembly strategies

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) requires the concerted action of many different proteins that assemble at sites of damaged DNA in a sequential fashion. We have constructed a mathematical model delineating hallmarks and general characteristics for NER. We measured the assembly kinetics of the putative damage-recognition factor XPC-HR23B at sites of DNA damage in the nuclei of living cells. These and other in vivo kinetic data allowed us to scrutinize the dynamic behavior of the nucleotide excision repair process in detail. A sequential assembly mechanism appears remarkably advantageous in terms of repair efficiency. Alternative mechanisms for repairosome formation, including random assembly and preassembly, can readily become kinetically unfavorable. Based on the model, new experiments can be defined to gain further insight into this complex process and to critically test model predictions. Our work provides a kinetic framework for NER and rationalizes why many multiprotein processes within the cell nucleus show sequential assembly strategy.