A meta-analysis of interleukin-8 -251 promoter polymorphism associated with gastric cancer risk

Background

Potential functional allele A/T single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of Interleukin 8 (IL-8) promoter -251has been implicated in gastric cancer risk.

Methods

We aimed to explore the role of A/T SNP of IL-8 -251 in the susceptibility to gastric cancer through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Each initially included article was scored for quality appraisal. Desirable data were extracted and registered into databases. Eighteen studies were ultimately eligible for the meta-analysis of IL-8 - 251 A/T SNP. We adopted the most probably appropriate genetic model (codominant model). Potential sources of heterogeneity were sought out via stratification and sensitivity analyses, and publication biases were estimated.

Results

Between IL-8 -251 AA genotype with gastric cancer risk, statistically significant association could be noted with overall gastric cancer, evidently noted in Asians, witnessed in high quality subgroup, and apparently noted in intestinal-type gastric cancer.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis indicates that IL-8 -251 AA genotype is associated with the overall risk of developing gastric cancer and may seem to be more susceptible to overall gastric cancer in Asian populations. IL-8 -251 AA genotype is more associated with the intestinal-type gastric cancer. IL-8 -251 AA genotype is not associated with Helicobacter Pylori infection status in our meta-analysis.

Impact

The analyses suggest that IL-8 -251 AA genotype may be an important biomarker of gastric cancer susceptibility for Asians, especially for Chinese Han population, the assumption that needs to be further confirmed in future well-designed studies in China.     

A meta-analysis of interleukin-10-1082 promoter polymorphism associated with gastric cancer risk

We aimed to explore the role of allele A/G single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of gene Interleukin 10 (IL-10) promoter-1082 in the susceptibility to gastric cancer through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Each initially included article was scored for quality appraisal. Desirable data were extracted and registered into databases. Twenty studies were ultimately eligible for the meta-analysis of IL-10-1082 A/G SNP. We adopted the most probably appropriate genetic model (dominant model), with the combined group of GG-plus-GA genotypes compared with the AA genotype. Potential sources of heterogeneity were sought out via subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses, and publication biases were estimated. Between IL-10-1082 GG-plus-GA genotypes with the risk of developing gastric cancer, statistically significant association could be noted with overall gastric cancer, being mainly in Asian subgroup, large sample subgroup, high quality subgroup, intestinal-type subgroup, cardia-type subgroup, and some genotyping method subgroups. Our meta-analysis indicates that IL-10-1082 GG-plus-GA genotypes are associated with the overall risk of developing gastric cancer and seem to be more susceptible to overall gastric cancer in Asian populations. IL-10-1082 GG-plus-GA genotypes are more associated with the pathologically intestinal-type gastric cancer or anatomically cardia-type gastric cancer.     

The Effect of XPD/ERCC2 Polymorphisms on Gastric Cancer Risk among Different Ethnicities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Potential xeroderma pigmentosum group D (XPD), also called excision repair cross-complimentary group two (ERCC2), Lys751Gln and Asp312Asn polymorphisms have been implicated in gastric cancer risk among different ethnicities.

Methods

We aimed to explore the effect of XPD Lys751Gln and Asp312Asn polymorphisms on the susceptibility to gastric cancer among different ethnicities through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Each initially included article was scored for quality appraisal. Desirable data were extracted and registered into databases. 13 studies were ultimately eligible for the meta-analysis of Lys751Gln polymorphism and 9 studies for the meta-analysis of Asp312Asn polymorphism. We adopted the most probably appropriate genetic model (recessive model) for both Lys751Gln and Asp312Asn polymorphisms. Potential sources of heterogeneity were sought out via subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and publication biases were estimated.

Results

Statistically significant findings were apparently noted in Asians but not in Caucasians for both XPD Lys751Gln and XPD Asp312Asn polymorphisms. A statistically significant finding could be seen in noncardia-type gastric cancer for XPD Lys751Gln polymorphism. A statistically significant finding could also be seen in high quality subgroup, small-and-moderate sample size subgroup, articles published after 2007, or PCR-RFLP genotyping subgroup for XPD Asp312Asn polymorphism.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis indicates that XPD Gln751Gln (CC) genotype and Asn312Asn (AA) genotype may seem to be more susceptible to gastric cancer in Asian populations but not in Caucasian populations, suggesting that the two genotypes may be important biomarkers of gastric cancer susceptibility for Asian populations, the assumption that needs to be further confirmed in well-designed studies among different ethnicities. Gln751Gln (CC) genotype may also be associated with noncardia-type gastric cancer risk, which should also be confirmed among different ethnicities in the future.     

A meta-analysis of interleukin-10 -592 promoter polymorphism associated with gastric cancer risk

We aimed to explore the role of IL-10 -592 A/C SNP in the susceptibility to gastric cancer through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Each initially included article was scored for quality appraisal. 17 studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. We adopted the most probably appropriate genetic model (recessive model). Potential sources of heterogeneity were sought out via subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and publication biases were estimated. IL-10-592 AA genotype is associated with the reduced risk of developing gastric cancer among Asians and even apparently observed among Asians high quality subgroup, suggesting IL-10-592 AA genotype may seem to be more protective from overall gastric cancer in Asian populations. IL-10-592 AA genotype is also associated with the overall reduced gastric cancer susceptibility in persons with H. pylori infection compared with controls without H. pylori infection, suggesting IL-10-592 AA genotype may seem to be more protective from overall gastric cancer susceptibility in persons infected with H. pylori. IL-10-592 AA genotype is not associated with either pathologic subtypes (intestinal or diffuse) or anatomic subtypes (non-cardia or cardia) of gastric cancer susceptibility. Genotyping methods like direct sequencing should be highly advocated to be conducted in future well-designed high quality studies among different ethnicities or populations.     

The E-cadherin (CDH1) -160C>A polymorphism associated with gastric cancer among Asians but not Europeans

E-cadherin (CDH1) is a tumor suppressor gene involved in epithelial cell-cell interactions and plays important roles in the etiology of gastric cancer. Studies reporting conflicting results on the role of -160C>A polymorphism in the CDH1 promoter region on gastric cancer risk led us to perform a meta-analysis to investigate this relationship. Thirteen published case-control studies including 2509 gastric cancer cases and 3687 controls were identified. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess the strength of the association. Overall, individuals with the variant genotypes were not associated with a significant gastric cancer risk (AA vs. CC: OR?=?1.04, 95% CI: 0.74-1.48; CA vs. CC: 1.02, 0.85-1.21; AA/CA vs. CC: 1.03, 0.86-1.22; AA vs. CA/CC: 1.03, 0.74-1.43). However, in the stratified analysis by ethnicity, significantly decreased gastric cancer risk was found among Asians in dominant model (AA/CA vs. CC: 0.84, 0.72-0.99). Further, when stratified by clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer, no statistically significant result was observed for any analysis. The results suggested that the CDH1 -160C>A polymorphism may contribute to susceptibility to gastric cancer among Asians. Additional well-designed large studies will be required to validate this association in different populations.     

The association between GSTM1 polymorphism and gastric cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Relationship of gastric cancer with the GSTM1 polymorphism was reported with inconsistent results. The objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate the association between GSTM1 polymorphism and gastric cancer susceptibility. Relevant studies were identified from PubMed and references of retrieved articles. A meta-analysis was performed, which included 38 studies with 6,605 gastric cancer cases and 11,311 controls. The combined result based on all studies showed there was a significant link between GSTM1 null genotype and gastric cancer (OR = 1.20, 95%CI: 1.08–1.34). When stratifying for the race, the phenomenon was found that gastric cancer case had a significantly higher frequency of GSTM1 null genotype than control in Asians (OR = 1.27, 95%CI: 1.10–1.47). However, there was not enough evidence to show there was a significant difference in GSTM1 null genotype distribution between gastric cancer case and control in Caucasians (OR = 1.13, 95%CI: 0.96–1.32). This meta-analysis indicated that GSTM1 null genotype might be associated with increased gastric cancer risk in Asians. However, this meta-analysis did not provide an evidence of confirming association between GSTM1 polymorphism and gastric cancer in Caucasians.     

Null genotype of GSTT1 contributes to increased Parkinson’s disease risk in Caucasians: evidence from a meta-analysis

Conflicting results in previous case–control studies on the association between Glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) gene polymorphism and Parkinson’s disease (PD) risk have been reported, so we conducted this meta-analysis. We searched and extracted data from 3 Chinese and 3 English web-based electronic databases to evaluate the associations by odds ratio (OR) and its 95 % confidence interval (CI) under the recessive genetic comparison model (null genotype vs. present genotype). We also conducted subgroup analyses by ethnicity and adjusted status of OR, respectively. Meta-analyses and subgroup analyses of larger studies (sample size ≥300) were also reanalyzed. When 18 eligible studies (3,963 PD cases and 5,472 controls) were pooled to analyze the association, we found no statistically significant result (OR 1.24, 95 % CI 0.96–1.60). In the subgroup analyses by ethnicity, there was statistically significant association between the null genotype of GSTT1 and PD risk among Caucasians, while the associations were not found among Asians and Latinos. In the subgroup analyses by adjusted status of OR, there were no significant associations both in studies with crude OR and adjusted OR. Meta-analyses and subgroup analyses of larger studies (sample size ≥300) were also confirmed the associations mentioned above. Power analysis indicated only meta-analysis of Caucasians had enough evidence to claim the association. In conclusion, the meta-analysis suggests that the null genotype of GSTT1 contributes to PD risk in Caucasians, and no association in Asians is needed more studies to confirm.     

CDH1 promoter polymorphism and stomach cancer susceptibility

The relationship of stomach cancer susceptibility and the presence of E-cadherin (CDH1) promoter −160 C/A polymorphism had been reported with conflicting results. To further explore the association of this polymorphism with stomach cancer susceptibility, we performed an extensive search of relevant studies and carried out a meta-analysis to obtain a more precise estimate. A total of 16 studies including 2,611 cases and 3,788 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. When all studies involved, the meta-analysis results suggest no statistically significant association between CDH1 −160 C/A polymorphism and stomach cancer risk (CA vs. CC: OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.85–1.19; AA vs. CC: OR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.75–1.46; dominant model: OR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.86–1.20; recessive model: OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.76–1.41). When subgroup analyses were performed by ethnicity, the A-allele carriers conferred a decreased stomach cancer risk in Asians (AA vs. CC: OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47–0.96; dominant model: OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72–0.99), but no statistically significant association was found in Caucasians. In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that CDH1 −160 A-allele may play a protective role of stomach cancer development in Asians but not in Caucasians.     

Ethnic differences in the association of the glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) null genotype and risk of gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between the glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) deletion polymorphism and gastric cancer risk in populations from different ethnic backgrounds, based on a comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE libraries. Thirty-six individual case–control studies comprising 7,689 gastric cancer cases and 12,445 controls were included in our meta-analysis. Overall, the GSTT1 null genotype appeared to increase gastric cancer risk (OR 1.17, 95 % CI 1.06–1.31, p = 0.003). While Caucasian populations showed an association between the GSTT1 deletion polymorphism and gastric cancer risk (OR 1.27, 95 % CI 1.05–1.52, p = 0.01), Asian populations did not show such an association (p = 0.11). When stratified by quality assessment scores, a significant association between the GSTT1 deletion polymorphism and gastric cancer risk was observed only in the Caucasian high quality subgroup (OR 1.27 95 % CI 1.01–1.60, p = 0.05). Null genotypes for both GSTT1 and GSTM1 deletion polymorphisms also increased gastric cancer risk (OR 1.37, 95 % CI 1.04–1.80, p = 0.03). Our study suggests that the GSTT1 null genotype is associated with a significant increase in gastric cancer risk in Caucasians, but not in Asians. Further well-designed studies are required to confirm the association between GSTT1 polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk in relation to various clinicopathological factors in different ethnic groups, especially Caucasians.     

Vitamin C Intake and Pancreatic Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Published Case-Control and Cohort Studies

Background

Observational studies inconsistently reported the relationship between vitamin C intake and risk of pancreatic cancer. We conducted a meta-analysis of published case-control and cohort studies to quantify the association.

Methods

Potentially eligible studies were found on PubMed and EMBASE databases through May 31, 2015. A random-effects model was assigned to compute summary point estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also performed to explore sources of heterogeneity.

Results

Our final analyses included 20 observational studies comprising nearly 5 thousand cases of pancreatic cancer. When comparing the highest with the lowest categories of vitamin C intake, the summary odds ratio/relative risk for case-control studies (14 studies), cohort studies (6 studies) and all studies combined was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.52–0.66), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.78–1.11) and 0.66 (95% CI: 0.58–0.75), respectively. The difference in the findings between case-control and cohort studies was statistically significant (P < .001). Possible publication bias was shown in the meta-analysis of case-control studies.

Conclusion

There is insufficient evidence to conclude any relationship between vitamin C intake and risk of pancreatic cancer. The strong inverse association observed in case-control studies may be affected by biases (eg, recall and selection biases) that particularly affect case-control studies and/or potential publication bias. Future prospective studies of vitamin C intake and pancreatic cancer are needed.     

Significant association of glutathione S-transferase T1 null genotype with esophageal cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Recent studies on the association between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) polymorphism and risk of esophageal cancer showed inconclusive results. To clarify this possible association, we conducted a meta-analysis of published studies. Data were collected from the following electronic databases: Pubmed, Embase, and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM). The odds ratio (OR) and its 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) was used to assess the strength of this association. We summarized the data on the association between GSTT1 null genotype and risk of esophageal cancer in the overall population, and performed subgroup analyses by ethnicity. Finally, a total of 24 independent studies including a total of 7,801 subjects (2,965 cases and 4,836 controls) were eligible for meta-analysis. In the overall analysis, there was no significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and esophageal cancer risk (OR = 1.15, 95 % CI 0.99–1.33, P = 0.067). However, meta-analysis of adjusted ORs showed a significant association between GSTT1 null genotype and increased risk of esophageal cancer (OR = 1.30, 95 % CI 1.08–1.56, P = 0.005). Subgroup analyses by ethnicity showed there was an obvious association between GSTT1 null genotype and increased risk of esophageal cancer in East Asians (OR = 1.24, 95 % CI 1.10–1.39, P < 0.001), but not in Caucasians (OR = 0.89, 95 % CI 0.71–1.11, P = 0.300). There was no obvious risk of publication bias in this meta-analysis (Egger’s test, P = 0.784). This meta-analysis demonstrates that GSTT1 null genotype is independently associated with increased risk of esophageal cancer, and a race-specific effect may exist in this association.     

Absence of association between transforming growth factor B1 polymorphisms and gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) is a ubiquitous and essential cytokine that plays a dual role in the development of cancer: tumor suppressor in the early stage of carcinogenesis and tumor promoter in the later stage of carcinogenesis. To date, several studies have focused on the association between the TGFB1 polymorphisms and risk of gastric cancer. Conflicting results, however, have been reported. We conducted a meta-analysis to analyze more precisely the effects of the TGFB1 C-509T, T869C, and G915C polymorphisms on the risk of gastric cancer. No significant association between the TGFB1 C-509T, T869C, and G915C polymorphisms and risk of gastric cancer was observed in overall analyses and subgroup analyses according to ethnicity.     

Meta-analyses of the effect of cytochrome P450 2E1 gene polymorphism on the risk of head and neck cancer

Many studies have investigated the association between the CYP2E1 5′-flanking region (RsaI/PstI) polymorphism and head and neck cancer susceptibility, but the results were conflicting. In this meta-analysis, we assessed 24 published studies involving 12,562 subjects of the association between CYP2E1 RsaI/PstI polymorphism and head and neck cancer risk. Using the fixed effects model, we found significant association between PstI/RsaI polymorphism and head and neck cancer risk [OR = 1.11 (95%CI: 1.00–1.22) for c2 allele (P = 0.04) and OR = 1.57 (95% CI: 1.14–2.15) for c2 homozygous (P = 0.006) compared with wild type homozygote]. Significant results were also found in East Asians and Mix populations when stratified by ethnicity. However, no significant associations were found for Caucasians in all genetic models. Stratified analyses according to source of controls, significant associations were found only in hospital base controls. In the subgroup analyses by tumor types, significant association was detected only in oral cancer group, while no significant associations among laryngeal- or pharyngeal- cancer subgroup. This meta-analysis suggests that the CYP2E1 RsaI/PstI polymorphism may be a risk factor for head and neck cancer in Asians and Mix population, and that different carcinogenic processes involved in the genesis of various tumor types may exist.     

Has-miR-146a polymorphism (rs2910164) and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 19 case–control studies

Epidemiological studies have evaluated the association between has-miR-146a polymorphism (rs2910164) and cancer risk. However, published data are still inconclusive. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between has-miR-146a polymorphism (rs2910164) and cancer susceptibility until May 8, 2010. Nineteen published case–control studies including a total of 10,496 cases and 12,885 controls were acquired. Overall, Increased cancer risk was found in domain model (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.03–1.35) rather than in other genetic models when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis. Stratified analysis shown that significant association between rs2910164 polymorphism and cancer susceptibility was present in Asians (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.01–1.29 for CG vs. CC; OR = 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03–1.39 for GG + CG vs. CC), but not in Caucasian populations. In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, no significantly increased risk of breast, gastric, prostate or bladder cancer were found in any of the genetic models. In summary, this meta-analysis suggests that has-miR-146a polymorphism (rs2910164) is associated with increased cancer susceptibility in Asians. However, further well-designed studies with large sample size will be necessary to validate the risk identified in the current meta-analysis.     

A meta-analysis of the association of glutathione S-transferase P1 gene polymorphism with the susceptibility of breast cancer

Glutathione S-transferase P1 (GSTP1) is one of the important mutant sites for the cancer risk at present. The conclusions of the published reports on the relationship between GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer are still debated. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the association between GSTP1 and the risk of breast cancer. The association reports were identified from PubMed and Cochrane Library, and eligible studies were included and synthesized using meta-analysis method. 35 investigations were included into this meta-analysis for the association of GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility, consisting of 40,347 subjects (18,665 patients with breast cancer and 21,682 controls). The association between GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and breast cancer risk was not found for overall population, Caucasians and Africans. Interestingly, the GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism was associated with the susceptibility of breast cancer in Asians (G allele: OR = 1.10, 95 % CI: 1.04–1.17, P = 0.001; GG genotype: OR = 1.36, 95 % CI: 1.14–1.62, P = 0.0008; AA genotype: OR = 0.92, 95 % CI: 0.85–0.98, P = 0.02). Furthermore, the GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism was associated with the susceptibility of breast cancer for the analysis of the controls from hospital. In conclusion, GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism is associated with the breast cancer susceptibility in Asians. However, more studies on the relationship between GSTP1 A/G gene polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer should be performed in further.     

Role of survivin as prognostic and clinicopathological marker in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis

Survivin has been implicated as a potential prognostic marker in a wide range of malignant tumours. However, the prognostic impact of survivin in gastric cancer remains to be controversial and published data are sometimes heterogeneous. Thus, aim of this study was to review the literature by performing an electronical database search via PubMed and EMBASE to identify eligible studies that assessed the impact of survivin as prognostic marker and its association with clinicopathological variables. Database search until November 21st 2012 retrieved 20 studies comprising 2,695 gastric cancer patients that assessed expression of survivin by immunohistochemistry or RT-PCR analyses in gastric cancer specimens. Meta-analyses of clinicopathological variables revealed an association between the expression of survivin and the presence of lymph node metastases (pooled OR: 0.58; 95 % CI 0.35–0.96). In addition, a correlation between the expression of survivin and overall survival for patients with gastric cancer (pooled HR 1.93; 95 % CI 1.51–2.48) became evident. More importantly, we were able to exclude a severe heterogeneity (I² = 31 %) or publication bias for the survival analyses. Furthermore, one-way sensitivity analysis and subgroup analyses regarding the method used to detect survivin, the type of survival analysis, the study quality and whether information was provided regarding neoadjuvant therapy supported our initial results. In conclusion, this meta-analysis indicates the prognostic significance of survivin in patients with gastric cancer.     

A meta-analysis of the relationship between glutathione S-transferase T1 null/presence gene polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer including 31802 subjects

The relationship between glutathione S-transferase T1 (GSTT1) null/presence gene polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer from the published reports are still conflicting. This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between GSTT1 null/presence gene polymorphism and the risk of lung cancer using meta-analysis method. The association studies were identified from PubMed, and Cochrane Library on July 1, 2012, and eligible investigations were included and synthesized using meta-analysis method. 51 reports were recruited into this meta-analysis for the association of null genotype of GSTT1 with lung cancer susceptibility, consisting of 15,140 patients with lung cancer and 16,662 controls. There was a marked association between GSTT1 null genotype and lung cancer risk in overall populations (OR = 1.15, 95 % CI 1.04–1.27, P = 0.007). Furthermore, GSTT1 null genotype was associated with the lung cancer risk in Asians (OR = 1.47, 95 % CI 1.23–1.76, P < 0.0001). However, GSTT1 null genotype was not associated with the risk of lung cancer in Caucasians, Brazilian population and Africans. In conclusion, GSTT1 null genotype is associated with the lung cancer in overall populations and in Asians.     

The rs7003908 (T>G) polymorphism in the XRCC7 gene and the risk of cancers

The association between the rs7003908 (T>G) polymorphism in the XRCC7 gene and the risk of cancers had been widely studied; however, the results were inconsistent. The objective of the current study was to investigate the association between the rs7003908 polymorphism in the XRCC7 gene and the risk of cancers by meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, EMbase, CNKI and Wanfang databases; the last search was performed on January 10th, 2014. Statistical analysis was performed using the Revman4.2 and STATA10.0 softwares. A total of 3,684 cancer cases and 5,232 controls from 11 case–control studies were included for data analysis. In the dominant model analysis, the results suggested a lack of association between the polymorphism and the risk of cancers: OR 1.01, 95 % CI 0.83–1.16, P = 0.70. In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity, no significant association was found either for Asians or Caucasians. In the subgroup analysis by cancer types, significant association was found for prostate cancer, but not for bladder cancer, breast cancer and glioma. In summary, the current meta-analysis confirmed that the rs7003908 polymorphism in the XRCC7 gene might be a risk factor for prostate cancer. In the future, more studies are needed to validate these results.     

CDH1 -160C>A gene polymorphism is an ethnicity-dependent risk factor for gastric cancer

The associations between E-cadherin (CDH1) gene polymorphisms and gastric cancer (GC) susceptibility are still controversial. Given this uncertainty, we carried out a meta-analysis of published case-control studies to derive more precise estimations of these relationships. Relevant studies were identified from PubMed and EMBASE up to March 2011. Seventeen studies with 3511 GC cases and 4826 controls were selected. Crude odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to investigate the strength of the associations. No associations between CDH1 (+54T>C, -160C>A, -347G>GA, -616G>C, -2076C>T and -3159T>C) gene polymorphisms and GC risk for all genetic models were found. As for CDH1 -160C>A polymorphism, subgroup analyses by country, gender, study design, smoking status, Helicobacter pylori infection, and the Lauren classification of GC did not change the results. When stratified by ethnicity, we found the A allele carriers had a significantly increased risk of GC among Caucasians (AA vs. CA+CC: OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.03-2.19, P=0.03), but not among Asians (AA vs. CA+CC: OR=0.87, 95% CI=0.56-1.37, P=0.56). No publication bias was found in the present study. This meta-analysis suggests that CDH1 -160C>A gene polymorphism may contribute to increased risk of GC among Caucasians.     

Association between TLR2 and TLR4 Gene Polymorphisms and the Susceptibility to Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Meta-Analysis

BackgroundThe associations between toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and toll-like receptor 4(TLR4) polymorphisms and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) susceptibility remain controversial. A meta-analysis was performed to assess these associations.MethodsA systematic search was performed to identify all relevant studies relating TLR2 and TLR4 polymorphisms and IBD susceptibility. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Subgroup analyses were performed by ethnicity and publication quality.ResultsThirty-eight eligible studies, assessing 10970 cases and 7061 controls were included. No TLR2 Arg677Trp polymorphism was found. No significant association was observed between TLR2 Arg753Gln polymorphism and Crohn’s disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in all genetic models. Interestingly, TLR4 Asp299Gly polymorphism was significantly associated with increased risk of CD and UC in all genetic models, except for the additive one in CD. In addition, a statistically significant association between TLR4 Asp299Gly polymorphism and IBD was observed among high quality studies evaluating Caucasians, but not Asians. Associations between TLR4 Thr399Ile polymorphisms and CD risk were found only in the allele and dominant models. The TLR4 Thr399Ile polymorphism was associated with UC risk in pooled results as well as subgroup analysis of high quality publications assessing Caucasians, in allele and dominant models.ConclusionsThe meta-analysis provides evidence that TLR2 Arg753Gln is not associated with CD and UC susceptibility in Asians; TLR4 Asp299Gly is associated with CD and UC susceptibility in Caucasians, but not Asians. TLR4 Thr399Ile may be associated with IBD susceptibility in Caucasians only. Additional well-powered studies of Asp299Gly and other TLR4 variants are warranted.