The number of repeat sequences in microtubule-associated protein 4 affects the microtubule surface properties

The microtubule-binding domain of MAP4, a ubiquitous microtubule-associated protein, contains a Repeat region with tandemly organized repeat sequences. In this study, we focused on the variations of the Repeat region, and searched for MAP4 isoforms with diverse Repeat region organizations. We successfully isolated four types of MAP4 cDNAs, which differed from each other in both the number and the arrangement of the repeat sequences, from a single source (bovine adrenal gland). To examine the functional differences among the isoforms, we prepared the microtubule-binding domain polypeptides of three of the four isoforms, and examined their activities. The isoform fragments showed similar degrees of microtubule assembly promoting activity and microtubule binding affinity. This result suggested that the Repeat region variation is not important for the control of microtubule dynamics, which is believed to be the main function of MAPs. On the other hand, the microtubule bundle-forming activity differed among the isoform fragments. The bundle formation was augmented by increasing the number of repeat sequences in the fragments. Based on these results, we propose the hypothesis that the role of the MAP4 isoforms is to regulate the surface charge of microtubules.     

Directional instability of microtubule transport in the presence of kinesin and dynein, two opposite polarity motor proteins

Kinesin and dynein are motor proteins that move in opposite directions along microtubules. In this study, we examine the consequences of having kinesin and dynein (ciliary outer arm or cytoplasmic) bound to glass surfaces interacting with the same microtubule in vitro. Although one might expect a balance of opposing forces to produce little or no net movement, we find instead that microtubules move unidirectionally for several microns (corresponding to hundreds of ATPase cycles by a motor) but continually switch between kinesin-directed and dynein-directed transport. The velocities in the plus-end (0.2-0.3 microns/s) and minus-end (3.5-4 microns/s) directions were approximately half those produced by kinesin (0.5 microns/s) and ciliary dynein (6.7 microns/s) alone, indicating that the motors not contributing to movement can interact with and impose a drag upon the microtubule. By comparing two dyneins with different duty ratios (percentage of time spent in a strongly bound state during the ATPase cycle) and varying the nucleotide conditions, we show that the microtubule attachment times of the two opposing motors as well as their relative numbers determine which motor predominates in this assay. Together, these findings are consistent with a model in which kinesin-induced movement of a microtubule induces a negative strain in attached dyneins which causes them to dissociate before entering a force-generating state (and vice versa); reversals in the direction of transport may require the temporary dissociation of the transporting motor from the microtubule. The bidirectional movements described here are also remarkably similar to the back-and-forth movements of chromosomes during mitosis and membrane vesicles in fibroblasts. These results suggest that the underlying mechanical properties of motor proteins, at least in part, may be responsible for reversals in microtubule-based transport observed in cells.     

Processivity of the Motor Protein Kinesin Requires Two Heads

A single kinesin molecule can move for hundreds of steps along a microtubule without dissociating. One hypothesis to account for this processive movement is that the binding of kinesin's two heads is coordinated so that at least one head is always bound to the microtubule. To test this hypothesis, the motility of a full-length single-headed kinesin heterodimer was examined in the in vitro microtubule gliding assay. As the surface density of single-headed kinesin was lowered, there was a steep fall both in the rate at which microtubules landed and moved over the surface, and in the distance that microtubules moved, indicating that individual single-headed kinesin motors are not processive and that some four to six single-headed kinesin molecules are necessary and sufficient to move a microtubule continuously. At high ATP concentration, individual single-headed kinesin molecules detached from microtubules very slowly (at a rate less than one per second), 100-fold slower than the detachment during two-headed motility. This slow detachment directly supports a coordinated, hand-over-hand model in which the rapid detachment of one head in the dimer is contingent on the binding of the second head.     

Myosin IIA regulates cell motility and actomyosin-microtubule crosstalk

Non-muscle myosin II has diverse functions in cell contractility, cytokinesis and locomotion, but the specific contributions of its different isoforms have yet to be clarified. Here, we report that ablation of the myosin IIA isoform results in pronounced defects in cellular contractility, focal adhesions, actin stress fibre organization and tail retraction. Nevertheless, myosin IIA-deficient cells display substantially increased cell migration and exaggerated membrane ruffling, which was dependent on the small G-protein Rac1, its activator Tiam1 and the microtubule moter kinesin Eg5. Myosin IIA deficiency stabilized microtubules, shifting the balance between actomyosin and microtubules with increased microtubules in active membrane ruffles. When microtubule polymerization was suppressed, myosin IIB could partially compensate for the absence of the IIA isoform in cellular contractility, but not in cell migration. We conclude that myosin IIA negatively regulates cell migration and suggest that it maintains a balance between the actomyosin and microtubule systems by regulating microtubule dynamics.     

Highly processive motility is not a general feature of the kinesins

Evidence is presented that the kinesin-related ncd protein is not as processive as kinesin. In low surface density motility experiments, a dimeric ncd fusion protein behaved mechanistically more similar to non-processive myosins than to the highly processive kinesin. First, there was a critical microtubule length for motility; only microtubules longer than this critical length moved in low density ncd surfaces, which suggested that multiple ncd proteins must cooperate to move microtubules in the surface assay. Under similar conditions, native kinesin demonstrated no critical microtubule length, consistent with the behavior of a highly processive motor. Second, addition of methylcellulose to decrease microtubule diffusion decreased the critical microtubule length for motility. Also, the rates of microtubule motility were microtubule length dependent in methylcellulose; short microtubules, that interacted with fewer ncd proteins, moved more slowly than long microtubules that interacted with more ncd proteins. In contrast, short microtubules, that interacted with one or a few kinesin proteins, moved on average slightly faster than long microtubules that interacted with multiple kinesins. We conclude that a degree of processivity as high as that of kinesin, where a single dimer can move over distances on the order of one micrometer, may not be a general mechanistic feature of the kinesin superfamily. Received: 16 September 1997 / Accepted: 4 November 1997     

Transport of African swine fever virus from assembly sites to the plasma membrane is dependent on microtubules and conventional kinesin

African swine fever virus (ASFV) is a large DNA virus that assembles in perinuclear viral factories located close to the microtubule organizing center. In this study, we have investigated the mechanism by which ASFV reaches the cell surface from the site of assembly. Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that at 16 h postinfection, mature virions were aligned along microtubules. Furthermore, virus movement to the cell periphery was inhibited when microtubules were depolymerized by nocodazole. In addition, ASFV infection resulted in the increased acetylation of microtubules as well as their protection against depolymerization by nocodazole. Immunofluorescence microscopy showed that conventional kinesin was recruited to virus factories and to a large fraction of virus particles in the cytoplasm. Consistent with a role for conventional kinesin during ASFV egress to the cell periphery, overexpression of the cargo-binding domain of the kinesin light chain severely inhibited the movement of particles to the plasma membrane. Based on our observations, we propose that ASFV is recognized as cargo by conventional kinesin and uses this plus-end microtubule motor to move from perinuclear assembly sites to the plasma membrane.     

Kinesin is involved in protecting nascent microtubules from disassembly after recovery from nocodazole treatment

Upon recovery from nocodazole treatment, microtubules from cultured epithelial cells exhibit unusual properties: they re-grow as fast as any highly dynamic microtubule, but they are also protected against disassembly when challenged with nocodazole like the stable microtubules of steady-state cells. Exploring the mechanism that underlies this protection, we found that it was sensitive to ATP treatment and that it involved conventional kinesin. Kinesin localized at the growing end or along nascent microtubules. Its inhibition using a dominant-negative construct for cargo binding, or by micro-injecting an anti-kinesin heavy chain antibody that impairs motor activity, resulted in the partial or total loss of microtubule protection. Finally, in an ex vivo elongation assay, we found that kinesin also participates in the control of microtubule re-growth. Altogether, our findings suggest that kinesin is involved in an early microtubule protection process that is linked to the control of their dynamics during their early growth phase.     

Identification of a neural cell specific variant of microtubule-associated protein 4

The microtubule-binding domain of MAP4, a ubiquitous microtubule-associated protein, contains a region rich in proline and basic residues (proline-rich region). We searched the bovine adrenal gland for MAP4 isoforms, and identified a novel variant lacking 72 consecutive amino acid residues within the proline-rich region, as compared with the full-length MAP4. The amino acid sequence of the missing region was highly conserved (about 85% identity/similarity) among the corresponding regions of bovine, human, mouse, and rat MAP4, which suggested the functional significance of this region. A comparison of the genomic sequence with the cDNA sequence revealed that the missing region is encoded by a single exon. A MAP4 variant cDNA homologous to the bovine form was also detected in rat cells, suggesting that the new variant can be generated by alternative splicing, not only in bovine but also in other mammalian species. The mRNA expression of the novel isoform was restricted to the brain and the adrenal medulla, suggesting that this isoform is specific to a certain cell type. Using a bacterially expressed fragment corresponding to the microtubule-binding domain of the novel isoform, we analyzed its in vitro characteristics. The fragment induced microtubule assembly and bound to preformed microtubules, but the activities were slightly lower than those of the conventional MAP4 fragment, which carries the full-length proline-rich region. The microtubules assembled in the presence of the fragment failed to be bundled. Instead, a constant spacing between neighboring microtubules was observed.     

The role of microtubules in processive kinesin movement

Kinesins are microtubule-based motors that are important for various intracellular transport processes. To understand the mechanism of kinesin movement, X-ray crystallography has been used to study the atomic structures of kinesin. However, as crystal structures of kinesin alone accumulate, it is becoming clear that kinesin structures should also be investigated with the microtubule to understand the contribution of the microtubule track to the nucleotide-induced conformational changes of kinesin. Recently, several high-resolution structures of kinesin with microtubules were obtained using cryo-electron microscopy. Comparison with X-ray crystallographic structures revealed the importance of the microtubule in determining the conformation of kinesin. Together with recent biophysical data, we describe different structural models of processive kinesin movement and provide a framework for future experiments.     

From cilia and flagella to intracellular motility and back again: a review of a few aspects of microtubule-based motility

Ciliary or flagellar movement is the model of microtubule-dependent motility, the best studied at the molecular level. It is based on the relative sliding of outer doublets of microtubules that are linked at their proximal end to the basal structure and interconnected by associated proteins, among which dynein ATPase is at the origin of the movement. It is regulated from inside and outside media by various diffusible factors such as Ca2+, cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP), polypeptides and so on (see other conferences presented during this meeting). Other motility processes are based on microtubules: vesicle and organelle transport through the cytoplasm (axonal flow in neurons, pigment granule movements in fish chromatophores, movements of particles along heliozoan axopods, etc.) could be mediated by microtubule motors such as kinesin or MAP 1C. Kinesin and MAP 1C, like dynein, are proteins that bind to microtubules and show an ATPase activity associated with force production. They differ from each other by their structure, and biochemical and pharmacological properties. The movements of chromosomes during mitosis and meiosis have long been studied, but are still poorly understood at the molecular level; this topic will be discussed in the light of recent data. Other constituents of the cytoskeleton are certainly involved in cellular motility: actin microfilaments and their motor myosin, intermediate filaments, non-actin filaments, all organized around the Microtubule Organizing Center (MTOC). As more information becomes available, it seems increasingly obvious that these various networks are closely interconnected and that each component probably modulates, resists, or favors properties of its partners, contributing to cellular and intracellular motility.     

The role of kinesin and other soluble factors in organelle movement along microtubules

Kinesin is a force-generating ATPase that drives the sliding movement of microtubules on glass coverslips and the movement of plastic beads along microtubules. Although kinesin is suspected to participate in microtubule-based organelle transport, the exact role it plays in this process is unclear. To address this question, we have developed a quantitative assay that allows us to determine the ability of soluble factors to promote organelle movement. Salt-washed organelles from squid axoplasm exhibited a nearly undetectable level of movement on purified microtubules. Their frequency of movement could be increased greater than 20-fold by the addition of a high speed axoplasmic supernatant. Immunoadsorption of kinesin from this supernatant decreased the frequency of organelle movement by more than 70%; organelle movements in both directions were markedly reduced. Surprisingly, antibody purified kinesin did not promote organelle movement either by itself or when it was added back to the kinesin-depleted supernatant. This result suggested that other soluble factors necessary for organelle movement were removed along with kinesin during immunoadsorption of the supernatant. A high level of organelle motor activity was recovered in a high salt eluate of the immunoadsorbent that contained only little kinesin. On the basis of these results we propose that organelle movement on microtubules involves other soluble axoplasmic factors in addition to kinesin.     

Kinesin-3 is an organelle motor in the squid giant axon

Conventional kinesin (Kinesin-1), the founding member of the kinesin family, was discovered in the squid giant axon, where it is thought to move organelles on microtubules. In this study, we identify a second squid kinesin by searching an expressed sequence tag database derived from the ganglia that give rise to the axon. The full-length open reading frame encodes a 1753 amino acid sequence that classifies this protein as a Kinesin-3. Immunoblots demonstrate that this kinesin, unlike Kinesin-1, is highly enriched in chaotropically stripped axoplasmic organelles, and immunogold electron microscopy (EM) demonstrates that Kinesin-3 is tightly bound to the surfaces of these organelles. Video microscopy shows that movements of purified organelles on microtubules are blocked, but organelles remain attached, in the presence Kinesin-3 antibody. Immunogold EM of axoplasmic spreads with antibody to Kinesin-3 decorates discrete sites on many, but not all, free organelles and localizes Kinesin-3 to organelle/microtubule interfaces. In contrast, label for Kinesin-1 decorates microtubules but not organelles. The presence of Kinesin-3 on purified organelles, the ability of an antibody to block their movements along microtubules, the tight association of Kinesin-3 with motile organelles and its distribution at the interface between native organelles and microtubules suggest that Kinesin-3 is a dominant motor in the axon for unidirectional movement of organelles along microtubules.     

Tubulin protofilaments and kinesin-dependent motility

Microtubules are built of tubulin subunits assembled into hollow cylinders which consist of parallel protofilaments. Thus, motor molecules interacting with a microtubule could do so either with one or several tubulin subunits. This makes it difficult to determine the structural requirements for the interaction. One way to approach the problem is to alter the surface lattice. This can be done in several ways. Proto-filaments can be exposed on their inside (C-tubules or "sheets"), they can be made antiparallel (zinc sheets), or they can be rolled up (duplex tubules). We have exploited this polymorphism to study how the motor protein kinesin attached to a glass surface interacts and moves the various tubulin assemblies. Microtubules glide over the surface along straight paths and with uniform velocities. In the case of C-tubules, approximately 40% glide similarly to microtubules, but a major fraction do not glide at all. This indicates (a) that a full cylindrical closure is not necessary for movement, and (b) that the inside surface of microtubules does not support gliding. With zinc sheets, up to 70% of the polymers move, but the movement is discontinuous, has a reduced speed, and follows along a curved path. Since zinc sheets have protofilaments alternating in orientation and polarity, this result suggests that in principle a single protofilament can produce movement, even when its neighbors cannot. Duplex microtubules do not move because they are covered with protofilaments coiled inside out, thus preventing the interaction with kinesin. The data can be explained by assuming that the outside of one protofilament represents the minimal track for kinesin, but smooth gliding requires several parallel protofilaments. Finally, we followed the motion of kinesin-coated microbeads on sea-urchin sperm flagella, from the flagellar outer doublet microtubules to the singlet microtubule tips extending from the A-tubules. No change in behavior was detected during the transition. This indicates that even if these microtubules differ in surface lattice, this does not affect the motility.     

Directional loading of the kinesin motor molecule as it buckles a microtubule.

Single kinesin motor molecules were observed to buckle the microtubules along which they moved in a modified in vitro gliding assay. In this assay a central portion of the microtubule was clamped to the glass substrate via biotin-streptavidin bonds, while the plus end of the microtubule was free to interact with motors adsorbed at low density to the substrate. A statistical analysis of the length of microtubules buckled by single motors showed a decreasing probability of buckling for loads greater than 4-6 pN parallel to the filament. This is consistent with kinesin stalling forces found in other experiments. A detailed analysis of some buckling events allowed us to estimate both the magnitude and direction of the loading force as it developed a perpendicular component tending to pull the motor away from the microtubule. We also estimated the motor speed as a function of this changing vector force. The kinesin motors consistently reached unexpectedly high speeds as the force became nonparallel to the direction of motor movement. Our results suggest that a perpendicular component of load does not hinder the kinesin motor, but on the contrary causes the motor to move faster against a given parallel load. Because the perpendicular force component speeds up the motor but does no net work, perpendicular force acts as a mechanical catalyst for the reaction. A simple explanation is that there is a spatial motion of the kinesin molecule during its cycle that is rate-limiting under load; mechanical catalysis results if this motion is oriented away from the surface of the microtubule.     

A role for kinesin in insulin-stimulated GLUT4 glucose transporter translocation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes

Insulin regulates glucose uptake in adipocytes and muscle by stimulating the movement of sequestered glucose transporter 4 (GLUT4) proteins from intracellular membranes to the cell surface. Here we report that optimal insulin-mediated GLUT4 translocation is dependent upon both microtubule and actin-based cytoskeletal structures in cultured adipocytes. Depolymerization of microtubules and F-actin in 3T3-L1 adipocytes causes the dispersion of perinuclear GLUT4-containing membranes and abolishes insulin action on GLUT4 movements to the plasma membrane. Furthermore, heterologous expression in 3T3-L1 adipocytes of the microtubule-binding protein hTau40, which impairs kinesin motors that move toward the plus ends of microtubules, markedly delayed the appearance of GLUT4 at the plasma membrane in response to insulin. The hTau40 protein had no detectable effect on microtubule structure or perinuclear GLUT4 localization under these conditions. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that both the actin and microtubule-based cytoskeleton, as well as a kinesin motor, direct the translocation of GLUT4 to the plasma membrane in response to insulin.     

Fluctuation in the microtubule sliding movement driven by kinesin in vitro.

We studied the fluctuation in the translational sliding movement of microtubules driven by kinesin in a motility assay in vitro. By calculating the mean-square displacement deviation from the average as a function of time, we obtained motional diffusion coefficients for microtubules and analyzed the dependence of the coefficients on microtubule length. Our analyses suggest that 1) the motional diffusion coefficient consists of the sum of two terms, one that is proportional to the inverse of the microtubule length (as the longitudinal diffusion coefficient of a filament in Brownian movement is) and another that is independent of the length, and 2) the length-dependent term decreases with increasing kinesin concentration. This latter term almost vanishes within the length range we studied at high kinesin concentrations. From the length-dependence relationship, we evaluated the friction coefficient for sliding microtubules. This value is much larger than the solvent friction and thus consistent with protein friction. The length independence of the motional diffusion coefficient observed at sufficiently high kinesin concentrations indicates the presence of correlation in the sliding movement fluctuation. This places significant constraint on the possible mechanisms of the sliding movement generation by kinesin motors in vitro.     

Redundant mechanisms for anaphase chromosome movements: crane-fly spermatocyte spindles normally use actin filaments but also can function without them

Summary. Actin inhibitors block or slow anaphase chromosome movements in crane-fly spermatocytes, but stopping of movement is only temporary; we assumed that cells adapt to loss of actin by switching to mechanism(s) involving only microtubules. To test this, we produced actin-filament-free spindles: we added latrunculin B during prometaphase, 9–80 min before anaphase, after which chromosomes generally moved normally during anaphase. We confirmed the absence of actin filaments by staining with fluorescent phalloidin and by showing that cytochalasin D had no effect on chromosome movement. Thus, actin filaments are involved in normal anaphase movements, but in vivo, spindles nonetheless can function normally without them. We tested whether chromosome movements in actin-filament-free spindles arise via microtubules by challenging such spindles with anti-myosin drugs. Y-27632 and BDM (2,3-butanedione monoxime), inhibitors that affect myosin at different regulatory levels, blocked chromosome movement in normal spindles and in actin-filament-free spindles. We tested whether BDM has side effects on microtubule motors. BDM had no effect on ciliary and sperm motility or on ATPase activity of isolated ciliary axonemes, and thus it does not directly block dynein. Nor does it block kinesin, assayed by a microtubule sliding assay. BDM could conceivably indirectly affect these microtubule motors, though it is unlikely that it would have the same side effect on the motors as Y-27632. Since BDM and Y-27632 both affect chromosome movement in the same way, it would seem that both affect spindle myosin; this suggests that spindle myosin interacts with kinetochore microtubules, either directly or via an intermediate component. Supplementary material to this paper is available in electronic form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00709-005-0094-6 Correspondence and reprints: Biology Department, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada.     

Interaction between kinesin, microtubules, and microtubule-associated protein 2

Kinesin from porcine brain was prepared by a procedure based on the strong binding of the protein to microtubules in the presence of sodium fluoride and ATP. The protocol reduces the requirement for taxol and AMP-PNP. The kinesin is active in terms of its ability to move microtubules on glass slides and its ATPase. The ATPase of this kinesin is about 8 nmol/min/mg; it is activated to 19 nmol/min/mg in the presence of microtubules. The relationship between gliding velocity and ATP concentration follows Michaelis-Menten kinetics. Using the motility assay, the maximal velocity is 0.78 micron/sec, and the Km value is 150 microM for ATP. For GTP the corresponding values are 0.38 micron/sec and 1.7 mM. ADP is a competitive inhibitor (Ki = 0.29 mM). Crude preparations of kinesin do not support motility on glass slides, whereas gel-filtered kinesin does. A search for potential inhibitory factors showed that one of them is MAP2; however, its inhibitory effect becomes visible only in certain conditions. MAP2 bound to microtubules does not inhibit kinesin-induced motility. However, when MAP2 and kinesin are preadsorbed to the glass surface independently of microtubules, MAP2 prevents the interaction of kinesin with microtubules, as if it formed a "lawn" that acted as a spacer and thus repelled the MAP-free microtubules or crosslinked the MAP-containing ones. The repelling effect of MAP2 domains (projection or assembly fragments obtained by chymotryptic cleavage) added separately is less pronounced and can be overcome by kinesin. These results reinforce the view of MAP2 as a spacer molecule.     

A single protofilament is sufficient to support unidirectional walking of Dynein and Kinesin

Cytoplasmic dynein and kinesin are two-headed microtubule motor proteins that move in opposite directions on microtubules. It is known that kinesin steps by a 'hand-over-hand' mechanism, but it is unclear by which mechanism dynein steps. Because dynein has a completely different structure from that of kinesin and its head is massive, it is suspected that dynein uses multiple protofilaments of microtubules for walking. One way to test this is to ask whether dynein can step along a single protofilament. Here, we examined dynein and kinesin motility on zinc-induced tubulin sheets (zinc-sheets) which have only one protofilament available as a track for motor proteins. Single molecules of both dynein and kinesin moved at similar velocities on zinc-sheets compared to microtubules, clearly demonstrating that dynein and kinesin can walk on a single protofilament and multiple rows of parallel protofilaments are not essential for their motility. Considering the size and the motile properties of dynein, we suggest that dynein may step by an inchworm mechanism rather than a hand-over-hand mechanism.     

Processive movement of single kinesins on crowded microtubules visualized using quantum dots

Kinesin-1 is a processive molecular motor transporting cargo along microtubules. Inside cells, several motors and microtubule-associated proteins compete for binding to microtubules. Therefore, the question arises how processive movement of kinesin-1 is affected by crowding on the microtubule. Here we use total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to image in vitro the runs of single quantum dot-labelled kinesins on crowded microtubules under steady-state conditions and to measure the degree of crowding on a microtubule at steady-state. We find that the runs of kinesins are little affected by high kinesin densities on a microtubule. However, the presence of high densities of a mutant kinesin that is not able to step efficiently reduces the average speed of wild-type kinesin, while hardly changing its processivity. This indicates that kinesin waits in a strongly bound state on the microtubule when encountering an obstacle until the obstacle unbinds and frees the binding site for kinesin's next step. A simple kinetic model can explain quantitatively the behaviour of kinesin under both crowding conditions.