Chromosomes are predominantly located randomly with respect to each other in interphase human cells

To test quantitatively whether there are systematic chromosome-chromosome associations within human interphase nuclei, interchanges between all possible heterologous pairs of chromosomes were measured with 24-color whole-chromosome painting (multiplex FISH), after damage to interphase lymphocytes by sparsely ionizing radiation in vitro. An excess of interchanges for a specific chromosome pair would indicate spatial proximity between the chromosomes comprising that pair. The experimental design was such that quite small deviations from randomness (extra pairwise interchanges within a group of chromosomes) would be detectable. The only statistically significant chromosome cluster was a group of five chromosomes previously observed to be preferentially located near the center of the nucleus. However, quantitatively, the overall deviation from randomness within the whole genome was small. Thus, whereas some chromosome-chromosome associations are clearly present, at the whole-chromosomal level, the predominant overall pattern appears to be spatially random.     

Mechanistic modelling allows to assess pathways of DNA lesion interactions underlying chromosome aberration formation

The knowledge of radiation-induced chromosomal aberration (CA) mechanisms is required in many fields of radiation genetics, radiation biology, biodosimetry, etc. However, these mechanisms are yet to be quantitatively characterised. One of the reasons is that the relationships between primary lesions of DNA/chromatin/chromosomes and dose-response curves for CA are unknown because the pathways of lesion interactions in an interphase nucleus are currently inaccessible for direct experimental observation. This article aims for the comparative analysis of two principally different scenarios of formation of simple and complex interchromosomal exchange aberrations: by lesion interactions at chromosome territories?? surface vs. in the whole space of the nucleus. The analysis was based on quantitative mechanistic modelling of different levels of structures and processes involved in CA formation: chromosome structure in an interphase nucleus, induction, repair and interactions of DNA lesions. It was shown that the restricted diffusion of chromosomal loci, predicted by computational modelling of chromosome organization, results in lesion interactions in the whole space of the nucleus being impossible. At the same time, predicted features of subchromosomal dynamics agrees well with in vivo observations and does not contradict the mechanism of CA formation at the surface of chromosome territories. On the other hand, the ??surface mechanism?? of CA formation, despite having certain qualities, proved to be insufficient to explain high frequency of complex exchange aberrations observed by mFISH technique. The alternative mechanism, CA formation on nuclear centres is expected to be sufficient to explain frequent complex exchanges.     

Conservation of relative chromosome positioning in normal and cancer cells

Chromosomes exist in the interphase nucleus as individual chromosome territories. It is unclear to what extent chromosome territories occupy particular positions with respect to each other and how structural rearrangements, such as translocations, affect chromosome organization within the cell nucleus. Here we analyze the relative interphase positioning of chromosomes in mouse lymphoma cells compared to normal splenocytes. We show that in a lymphoma cell line derived from an ATM(-/-) mouse, two translocated chromosomes are preferentially positioned in close proximity to each other. The relative position of the chromosomes involved in these translocations is conserved in normal splenocytes. Relative positioning of chromosomes in normal splenocytes is not due to their random distribution in the interphase nucleus and persists during mitosis. These observations demonstrate that the relative arrangement of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus can be conserved between normal and cancer cells and our data support the notion that physical proximity facilitates rearrangements between chromosomes.     

Structure and dynamics of interphase chromosomes

During interphase chromosomes decondense, but fluorescent in situ hybridization experiments reveal the existence of distinct territories occupied by individual chromosomes inside the nuclei of most eukaryotic cells. We use computer simulations to show that the existence and stability of territories is a kinetic effect that can be explained without invoking an underlying nuclear scaffold or protein-mediated interactions between DNA sequences. In particular, we show that the experimentally observed territory shapes and spatial distances between marked chromosome sites for human, Drosophila, and budding yeast chromosomes can be reproduced by a parameter-free minimal model of decondensing chromosomes. Our results suggest that the observed interphase structure and dynamics are due to generic polymer effects: confined Brownian motion conserving the local topological state of long chain molecules and segregation of mutually unentangled chains due to topological constraints.     

Intrachanges as part of complex chromosome-type exchange aberrations

The chromosome-type exchange aberrations induced by ionizing radiation during the G(0)/G(1) phase of the cell cycle are believed to be the result of illegitimate rejoining of chromosome breaks. From numerous studies using chromosome painting, it has emerged that even after a moderate dose of radiation, a substantial fraction of these exchanges is complex. Most of them are derived from the free interaction between the ends of three or more breaks. Other studies have demonstrated that chromosomes occupy distinct territories in the interphase nucleus. Since breaks that are in close proximity have an enhanced interaction probability, it seems likely that after ionizing radiation many of the interacting breaks will be present within one chromosome or chromosome arm. Unfortunately, the majority of these intrachanges remain undetected, even when sophisticated molecular cytogenetic detection methods (i.e. mFISH) are applied to paint all chromosome pairs in distinct colors. In the present paper, we evaluate the limitations of full-color painting for the detection of complex exchanges and the correct interpretations of break interactions.     

Yeast importin-β is required for nuclear import of the Mig2 repressor

Background

In interphase nuclei of a wide range of species chromosomes are organised into their own specific locations termed territories. These chromosome territories are non-randomly positioned in nuclei which is believed to be related to a spatial aspect of regulatory control over gene expression. In this study we have adopted the pig as a model in which to study interphase chromosome positioning and follows on from other studies from our group of using pig cells and tissues to study interphase genome re-positioning during differentiation. The pig is an important model organism both economically and as a closely related species to study human disease models. This is why great efforts have been made to accomplish the full genome sequence in the last decade.

Results

This study has positioned most of the porcine chromosomes in in vitro cultured adult and embryonic fibroblasts, early passage stromal derived mesenchymal stem cells and lymphocytes. The study is further expanded to position four chromosomes in ex vivo tissue derived from pig kidney, lung and brain.

Conclusions

It was concluded that porcine chromosomes are also non-randomly positioned within interphase nuclei with few major differences in chromosome position in interphase nuclei between different cell and tissue types. There were also no differences between preferred nuclear location of chromosomes in in vitro cultured cells as compared to cells in tissue sections. Using a number of analyses to ascertain by what criteria porcine chromosomes were positioned in interphase nuclei; we found a correlation with DNA content.     

Inter- und intrachromosomale Verteilung von Chromatidtranslokationen nach Einwirkung von Trenimon auf menschliche Leukocyten in vitro

250 chromatid interchanges induced by Trenimon were analyzed relative to their configuration, the participation of certain chromosomes or chromosome groups and the localization of the exchange points. Cis- and trans-configuration (=asymmetrical and symmetrical interchanges) have been observed in identical frequency. The same was seen relative to complete and incomplete reunion of the breaks. The interchromosomal as well as the intrachromosomal distribution of the exchange points was non-random. Homologous chromosomes participated in interchanges at a higher level of frequency than expected from their relative length. Chromosomes No. 6–12 and X as well as 16 and 21+22 took part in interchanges more frequently and chromosomes No. 2, 3, 4 and 5 more rarely than expected. The exchange points were frequently observed in the proximal regions of the chromosomes (incl. centromere) as well as in the short arms of chromosomes No. 13–15 and 21+22.     

染色体领域的研究及其进展

间期核中的染色体并不是散乱分布的,而是每条染色体占据了一块特定的核区域,即染色体领域（chromosome territory, CTs）,染色体领域在间期核中的排列与定位是经过严格组织的,并具有一定的动力学特征,染色体领域的这些严格的定位和空间组织与基因的表达调控密切相关。文章综述了这几个方面的研究进展。      

Chromosome positioning in the interphase nucleus

Chromosomes occupy distinct territories in the interphase cell nucleus. These chromosome territories are non-randomly arranged within the nuclear space. We are only just uncovering how chromosome territories are organized, what determines their position and how their spatial organization affects the expression of genes and genomes. Here, we discuss emerging models of non-random nuclear chromosome organization and consider the functional implications of chromosome positioning for gene expression and genome stability.     

SCHIP: statistics for chromosome interphase positioning based on interchange data

MOTIVATION: The position of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus is believed to be associated with a number of biological processes. Here, we present a web-based application that helps analyze the relative position of chromosomes during interphase in human cells, based on observed radiogenic chromosome aberrations. The inputs of the program are a table of yields of pairwise chromosome interchanges and a proposed chromosome geometric cluster. Each can either be uploaded or selected from provided datasets. The main outputs are P-values for the proposed chromosome clusters. SCHIP is designed to be used by a number of scientific communities interested in nuclear architecture, including cancer and cell biologists, radiation biologists and mathematical/computational biologists.     

Increased complexity of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations consistent with a mechanism of sequential formation

Complex chromosome aberrations (any exchange involving three or more breaks in two or more chromosomes) are effectively induced in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) after exposure to low doses (mostly single particles) of densely ionising high-linear energy transfer (LET) alpha-particle radiation. The complexity, when observed by multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridisation (m-FISH), shows that commonly four but up to eight different chromosomes can be involved in each rearrangement. Given the territorial organisation of chromosomes in interphase and that only a very small fraction of the nucleus is irradiated by each alpha-particle traversal, the aim of this study is to address how aberrations of such complexity can be formed. To do this, we applied theoretical "cycle" analyses using m-FISH paint detail of PBL in their first cell division after exposure to high-LET alpha-particles. In brief, "cycle" analysis deconstructs the aberration "observed" by m-FISH to make predictions as to how it could have been formed in interphase. We propose from this that individual high-LET alpha-particle-induced complex aberrations may be formed by the misrepair of damaged chromatin in single physical "sites" within the nucleus, where each "site" is consistent with an "area" corresponding to the interface of two to three different chromosome territories. Limited migration of damaged chromatin is "allowed" within this "area". Complex aberrations of increased size, reflecting the path of alpha-particle nuclear intersection, are formed through the sequential linking of these individual sites by the involvement of common chromosomes.     

Reorganization of inter‐chromosomal interactions in the 2q37‐deletion syndrome

Chromosomes occupy distinct interphase territories in the three‐dimensional nucleus. However, how these chromosome territories are arranged relative to one another is poorly understood. Here, we investigated the inter‐chromosomal interactions between chromosomes 2q, 12, and 17 in human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and MSC‐derived cell types by DNA‐FISH. We compared our findings in normal karyotypes with a three‐generation family harboring a 2q37‐deletion syndrome, featuring a heterozygous partial deletion of histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) on chr2q37. In normal karyotypes, we detected stable, recurring arrangements and interactions between the three chromosomal territories with a tissue‐specific interaction bias at certain loci. These inter‐chromosomal interactions were confirmed by Hi‐C. Interestingly, the disease‐related HDAC4 deletion resulted in displaced inter‐chromosomal arrangements and altered interactions between the deletion‐affected chromosome 2 and chromosome 12 and/or 17 in 2q37‐deletion syndrome patients. Our findings provide evidence for a direct link between a structural chromosomal aberration and altered interphase architecture that results in a nuclear configuration, supporting a possible molecular pathogenesis.     

Tissue-specific spatial organization of genomes

Background

Genomes are organized in vivo in the form of chromosomes. Each chromosome occupies a distinct nuclear subvolume in the form of a chromosome territory. The spatial positioning of chromosomes within the interphase nucleus is often nonrandom. It is unclear whether the nonrandom spatial arrangement of chromosomes is conserved among tissues or whether spatial genome organization is tissue-specific.

Results

Using two-dimensional and three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization we have carried out a systematic analysis of the spatial positioning of a subset of mouse chromosomes in several tissues. We show that chromosomes exhibit tissue-specific organization. Chromosomes are distributed tissue-specifically with respect to their position relative to the center of the nucleus and also relative to each other. Subsets of chromosomes form distinct types of spatial clusters in different tissues and the relative distance between chromosome pairs varies among tissues. Consistent with the notion that nonrandom spatial proximity is functionally relevant in determining the outcome of chromosome translocation events, we find a correlation between tissue-specific spatial proximity and tissue-specific translocation prevalence.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that the spatial organization of genomes is tissue-specific and point to a role for tissue-specific spatial genome organization in the formation of recurrent chromosome arrangements among tissues.

     

Global chromosome positions are transmitted through mitosis in mammalian cells

We investigated positioning of chromosomes during the cell cycle in live mammalian cells with a combined experimental and computational approach. By non-invasive labeling of chromosome subsets and tracking by 4D imaging, we could show that no global rearrangements occurred in interphase. Using the same assay, we also observed a striking order of chromosomes throughout mitosis. By contrast, our computer simulation based on stochastic movements of individual chromosomes predicted randomization of chromosome order in mitosis. In vivo, a quantitative assay for single chromosome positioning during mitosis revealed strong similarities between daughter and mother cells. These results demonstrate that global chromosome positions are heritable through the cell cycle in mammalian cells. Based on tracking of labeled chromosomes and centromeres during chromosome segregation and experimental perturbations of chromosomal order, we propose that chromosome specific timing of sister chromatid separation transmits chromosomal positions from one cell generation to the next.