朱砂叶螨对甲氰菊酯、阿维菌素,哒螨灵及其混剂抗性遗传力的分析(英文)

采用域性状分析法 ,估算了朱砂叶螨对 5种杀螨剂 (3种单剂和 2种混剂 )的抗性现实遗传力 ,并对 5种药剂的抗性风险进行了评估。把采自重庆北碚田间的朱砂叶螨种群 ,在室内不施药情况下饲养 6 0余代 ,以此作为抗性筛选的敏感品系。分别单一连续汰选近 30代 ,朱砂叶螨对甲氰菊酯、阿维菌素、哒螨灵、哒螨 -阿维 (哒螨灵 :阿维菌素 =7 4 :0 1,m m)和甲氰 -阿维 (甲氰菊酯 :阿维菌素 =8 9:0 1,m m)的抗性分别达 6 5 5 5、5 82、1 2 3、5 2 0和 1 4 2 倍 ;抗性现实遗传力分别为 0 2 16 7、0 0 96 7、0 0 130、0 0 80 0和 0 0 172。在实验室选择条件下 ,预计抗性增长 10倍时 ,甲氰菊酯、阿维菌素、哒螨灵、哒螨 -阿维 (哒螨灵 :阿维菌素 =7 4 :0 1,m m)和甲氰 -阿维 (甲氰菊酯 :阿维菌素 =8 9:0 1,m m)分别需要 15、34、333、4 2和 2 0 0代。甲氰菊酯抗性风险较高 ,其次是阿维菌素、哒螨 -阿维 (哒螨灵 :阿维菌素 =7 4 :0 1,m m)、甲氰 阿维 (甲氰菊酯 :阿维菌素 =8 9:0 1,m m) ,哒螨灵抗性风险较低。混剂哒螨 阿维 (哒螨灵 :阿维菌素 =7 4 :0 1,m m)不能延缓朱砂叶螨对两单剂哒螨灵和阿维菌素的抗性发展 ,而混剂甲氰 阿维 (甲氰菊酯 :阿维菌素 =8 9:0 1,m m)却能有效延缓朱砂叶螨对两单剂     

朱砂叶螨对甲氨菊酯、阿维菌素，哒螨灵及其混剂抗性遗传力的分析

采用域性状分析法,估算了朱砂叶螨对5种杀螨剂(3种单剂和2种混剂)的抗性现实遗传力,并对5种药剂的抗性风险进行了评估。把采自重庆北碚田间的朱砂叶螨种群,在室内不施药情况下饲养60余代,以此作为抗性筛选的敏感品系。分别单一连续汰选近30代,朱砂叶螨对甲氰菊酯、阿维菌素、哒螨灵、哒螨—阿维(哒螨灵：阿维菌素＝7．4：0．1,m/m)和甲氰—阿维(甲氰菊酯：阿维菌素＝8．9：0．1,m/m)的抗性分别达65．55、5．82、1．23、5．20和1．42．倍;抗性现实遗传力分别为0．2167、0．0967、0．0130、0．0800和0．0172。在实验室选择条件下,预计抗性增长10倍时,甲氰菊酯、阿维菌素、哒螨灵、哒螨—阿维(哒螨灵：阿维菌素＝7．4：0．1,m/m)和甲氰—阿维(甲氰菊酯：阿维菌素＝8．9：0．1,m/m)分别需要15、34、333、42和200代。甲氰菊酯抗性风险较高,其余是阿维菌素、哒螨—阿维(哒螨灵：阿维菌素＝7．4：0．1,m/m)、甲氰-阿维(甲氰菊酯：阿维菌素＝8．9：0．1,m/m),哒螨灵抗性风险较低。混剂哒螨-阿维(哒螨灵：阿维菌素＝7．4：0．1,m/m)不能延缓朱砂叶螨对两单剂哒螨灵和阿维菌素的抗性发展,而混剂甲氰-阿维(甲氰菊酯：阿维菌素＝8．9：0．1,m/m)却能有效延缓朱砂叶螨对两单剂甲氰菊酯和阿维菌素的抗性发展。     

朱砂叶螨不同抗性品系酯酶同工酶研究

在室内模拟田间药剂的选择压力,用3种不同药剂及其组合(轮用和混用)对朱砂叶螨Tetranychus cinnabarinus 进行抗药性选育.经过40余代的筛选,朱砂叶螨对甲氰菊酯、阿维菌素和哒螨·阿维混剂分别产生了68.5、8.7和6.7倍的抗性;甲氰菊酯和阿维菌素混用和轮用分别对甲氰菊酯产生了5.6倍和28.7倍抗性.朱砂叶螨各品系酯酶同工酶电泳结果和同工酶谱谱带密度扫描表明,与敏感品系相比,各抗性筛选品系的酯酶活性均有不同程度增加;阿维菌素抗性品系活性最强,酯酶带迁移距离明显远于其他抗性品系,表明该品系酯酶体系中存在变构酯酶.     

朱砂叶螨对三种杀螨剂的抗性选育与抗性风险评估

为评价朱砂叶螨Tetranychus cinnabarinus对3种杀螨剂的抗性风险,在实验室抗性品系选育基础上,应用数量遗传学中的域性状分析法,研究了朱砂叶螨北碚种群对甲氰菊酯、阿维菌素和哒螨灵3种杀螨剂的抗性现实遗传力,并对3种药剂在不同杀死率下抗性发展的速率进行了预测。结果表明：分别单一连续汰选16代后,朱砂叶螨对甲氰菊酯、阿维菌素的抗性倍数分别达26.54和4.51倍,对哒螨灵表现为敏感性降低（抗性倍数为1.16倍）;朱砂叶螨对甲氰菊酯、阿维菌素和哒螨灵的抗性现实遗传力分别为0.2472,0.1519和0.0160。在室内选择条件下,杀死率为50%～90%时,要获得10倍抗性,甲氰菊酯仅需要13～6代,阿维菌素需要约21～10代;哒螨灵需要约197～89代;在田间选择,三种药剂都将需要更长的时间。抗性筛选16代结果表明,抗性风险较高的是菊酯类的甲氰菊酯,其次是生物源农药阿维菌素,杂环类的哒螨灵抗性风险较小。试验结果可为朱砂叶螨抗性治理提供参考。     

桔全爪螨对阿维菌素和甲氰菊酯的抗性现实遗传力及风险评估

在实验室抗性选育的基础上,应用数量遗传学中的域性状分析法,研究了桔全爪螨北碚种群对阿维菌素和甲氰菊酯2种杀螨剂的抗性现实遗传力,并对2种药剂在不同杀死率下抗性发展的速率进行了预测.结果表明:用阿维菌素和甲氰菊酯分别不连续汰选11及16代后,桔全爪螨对两者的抗性分别为3.8和29.9倍,抗性现实遗传力分别为0.0475和0.1544.在室内选择条件下,杀死率为50%～90%时,要获得10倍抗性,甲氰菊酯仅需要7～16代,阿维菌素则需要12～26代.而在田间选择情况下,2种药剂都将需要更长的时间.抗性筛选结果表明,生物源农药阿维菌素的抗性风险明显低于菊酯类农药甲氰菊酯.试验结果可为桔全爪螨抗性治理提供参考.     

朱砂叶螨抗药性监测

本文采用药膜法建立了朱砂叶螨Tetranychus cinnabarinus（Boisduval）对5种杀螨剂的敏感基线,并对6个不同地理种群的朱砂叶螨进行了抗药性监测,结果表明：5种药剂杀螨活性由高到低分别为阿维菌素〉丁氟螨酯〉氧化乐果〉炔螨特〉甲氰菊酯,其对朱砂叶螨雌成螨的LC50值分别为0.08、2.19、67.89、201.19和605.27mg/L;朱砂叶螨各地理种群已对甲氰菊酯和炔螨特产生了低、中水平的抗性,其抗性倍数分别介于2.93～16.22与4.85～14.35之间,其中云南种群对这2种杀螨剂抗性最高,对氧化乐果与丁氟螨酯处于敏感性降低阶段,其抗性倍数分别介于2.35～4.26与1.56～2.11之间,对阿维菌素还未产生明显抗性;对阿维菌素和甲氰菊酯的增效剂生物测定结果表明,三类解毒酶系（多功能氧化酶、谷胱甘肽S-转移酶和酯酶）都不同程度地参与了朱砂叶螨抗药性的形成。     

巴氏新小绥螨甲氰菊酯抗性品系生物学特性及其对常用药剂的交互抗性

【目的】明确橘园常用药剂对巴氏新小绥螨Neoseiulus barkeri成螨的致死效应,弄清巴氏新小绥螨甲氰菊酯抗性品系对柑橘园常用药剂的交互抗性水平及生态适合度变化,为巴氏新小绥螨抗性品系的田间应用提供科学理论依据。【方法】在对巴氏新小绥螨进行致死效应和交互抗性测定的基础上,运用生态学方法对其生物学特性进行评价。【结果】不同药剂对巴氏新小绥螨成螨致死效应存在显著差异。高效氯氟氰菊酯和毒死蜱的致死率最高,校正死亡率分别为97.62%和92.57%;巴氏新小绥螨甲氰菊酯抗性品系螺螨酯、噻虫嗪、乙螨唑、毒死蜱和高效氯氟氰菊酯均存在显著交互抗性,其抗性倍数分别为7.56、10.32、11.45、19.10和45.89倍。生物学特性研究结果表明,与敏感品系相比,甲氰菊酯抗性的获得使其发育历期显著延长,但对捕食量和孵化率影响不显著。哒螨灵、丁氟螨酯和高效氯氟氰菊酯对巴氏新小绥螨抗性品系与敏感品系卵的孵化率具有显著影响,其他常用药剂对巴氏新小绥螨抗性品系与敏感品系卵的孵化率不存在显著影响。【结论】甲氰菊酯抗性获得使巴氏新小绥螨对柑橘园常用药剂表现不同水平的交互抗性;甲氰菊酯抗性获得对巴氏新小绥螨生长、繁殖及捕食均无显著影响,可在田间推广应用。     

二斑叶螨对阿维菌素、哒螨灵和甲氰菊酯的抗性选育及其解毒酶活力变化

在室内模拟田间药剂的选择压力,用阿维菌素、哒螨灵和甲氰菊酯对二斑叶螨Tetranychuc urticae逐代处理,以选育其抗性种群。选育至12代,对阿维菌素抗性增长到6.72倍,对哒螨灵抗性增长到12.1倍,对甲氰菊酯抗性增长到19.9倍。酶抑制剂和离体酶活性的测定结果表明,阿维菌素抗性种群的多功能氧化酶和谷胱甘肽S-转移酶的活性均有所提高;二斑叶螨对哒螨灵的抗性可能与多功能氧化酶、羧酸酯酶的活性增强有关;而羧酸酯酶、多功能氧化酶和谷胱甘肽S-转移酶活性的增强可能是二斑叶螨对甲氰菊酯产生抗性的主要原因。     

土耳其斯坦叶螨多重抗性品系选育及解毒酶活性的变化

为探索土耳其斯坦叶螨的多重抗药性及其生化机理,在室内对敏感系(SS)土耳其斯坦叶螨分别用螺螨酯、甲氰菊酯和阿维菌素的混剂进行处理,选育出多重抗性品系(Mp-R).结果表明: 选育至15代,土耳其斯坦叶螨的抗性指数达35.74倍.对不同品系的解毒酶活性分析显示,Mp-R品系相对SS品系的羧酸酯酶(CarE)、谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶(GSTs)和多功能氧化酶(MFO)的比活力分别是SS品系的1.21、1.53、9.18倍.说明CarE、GSTs、MFO的活性升高可促进土耳其斯坦叶螨对3种杀虫剂多重抗性的形成;MFO的活性升高可能是土耳其斯坦叶螨对3种杀虫剂产生多重抗性的主要原因.测定Mp-R品系和单抗品系(Ip-R)的农药感性和解毒酶活力变化发现,3种杀虫剂的混合使用可能会延缓土耳其斯坦叶螨对甲氰菊酯的抗性形成,加快对阿维菌素的抗性形成.     

数学模型在二元复配杀螨剂最优配比筛选中的应用

采用共毒系数法对复配剂的最优配比进行筛选可能会造成真正最优配比的漏筛,且工作量很大,具有局限性.以朱砂叶螨为试虫,分别对甲氰菊酯、阿维菌素、氯氰菊酯、三氯杀螨醇、氧化乐果、甲氰·阿维、氯氰·三杀和氧乐·甲氰进行毒力测定并对复配剂共毒系数Y进行计算.将甲氰菊酯、氯氰菊酯和氧化乐果在各自复配剂有效成分中的质量分数k进行反正弦转换(X=arcsin(k)1/2),通过SPSS软件拟合k反正弦转换值与共毒系数的数学模型.甲氰·阿维、氯氰·三杀和氧乐·甲氰的数学模型为Y1=-30179.08 769.24 X1-4.8472 X21;Y2=-251.53 32.34 X2-0.6858 X22;Y3=-7066.96 266.06 X3-2.4267 X23.对上述的3个方程进行求导可得:Y1'=769.24-9.6944 X1;Y2'=32.34-1.3716 X2;Y3'=266.06-4.8534 X3.令Y'=0,则有X1=79.34;X2=23.58;X3=54.82.将X1、X2和X3值分别代入各自的方程可以求得甲氰·阿维、氯氰·三杀和氧乐·甲氰复配剂的最大共毒系数分别为340.09、129.71和225.65,将X1、X2和X3值代入X=arcsin(K)1/2中可以求得各单剂在复配剂有效成分中的质量分数k值,根据k值可以求得:甲氰菊酯和阿维菌素的最优配比为28:1;辛硫磷和啶虫脒的最优配比为1:5.25;三唑磷和杀虫单最优配比为2:1.     

ESTMATION OF REALIZED HERITABILITY OF RESISTANCE TO FENPROPATHRIN, ABAMECTIN, PYRIDABEN AND THEIR MIXTURES IN ACARICIDE-SELECTED STRAINS OF TETRANYCHUS CINNABARINUS (BOIDUVAL)

Abstract Threshold trait analysis was used to estimate realized heritability (h²) of resistance to five acaricides (three single acaricide and two mixtures) and resistance risk in Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boiduval). Tetranychus cinnabarinus collected from the field of Beibei, Chongqing reared more than 60 generations under pesticide free conditions and considered susceptible. Successively selected for about 30 generations, the strain had a 65.55-, 5.82-, 1.23-, 5.20- and 1.42-fold increase in resistance to fenpropathrin, abamectin, pyridaben, pyridaben-abamectin (pyridaben: abamectin = 7.4:0.1, m/m) and fenpropathrin-abamectin (fenpropathrin: abamectin = 8.9:0.1, m/m), respectively. The realized heritability of resistance to fenpropathrin, abamectin, pyridaben, pyridaben-abamectin (pyridaben: abamectin = 7.4:0.1, m/m) and fenpropathrin-abamectin (fenpropathrin: abamectin = 8.9:0.1, m/m) is 0.2167, 0.0967, 0.0130, 0.0800 and 0.0172, respectively. Under the selected condition, a 10-fold increase in resistance would be expected 15 generations for fenpropathrin, 34 generations for abamectin, 333 generations for pyridaben, 42 generations for pyridaben-abamectin (pyridaben: abamectin = 7.4:0.1, m/m) and 200 generations for fenpropathrin-abametcin (fenpropathrin: abamectin = 8.9:0.1, m/m). The highest resistance risk of the five acaricides in Tetranychus cinnabarinus was fenpropathrin, then abamection, pyridaben-abamectin (pyridaben: abamectin = 7.4: 0.1, m/m), fenpropathrin- abamectin (fenpropathrin: abamectin = 8.9:0.1, m/m) and that to pyridaben was the lowest. The mixture of pyridaben and abamectin is not useful in delaying development of resistance in the pest to the two single acaricide while the mixture of fenpropathrin and abamectin could do it.     

抗药性叶螨的种群参数和相对适合度

朱砂叶螨对氧化乐果、三氯杀螨醇、双甲脒和哒螨灵产生抗性后（抗药性系数分别为152．83倍、55．59倍、62．61倍和15．67倍）,繁殖力均显著降低,且发育加速。通过组建各品系生命表得知,该螨抗氧化乐果品系、抗三氯杀螨醇品质、抗双甲脒品系和抗哒螨灵品系的相对适合度分别为0．53、0．62、0．59和0．64,均小于1,具有明显的适合度缺陷。抗药性系数和相对适合度呈直线负相关。     

昆明地区鲜切花产区朱砂叶螨抗药性监测

采用玻片浸渍法测定了昆明地区花卉朱砂叶螨Tetranychus cinnabarinus(Boisduval)对阿维菌素、甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐、溴虫腈、丁醚脲、炔螨特和哒螨灵的抗性。结果表明,昆明北郊和呈贡地区玫瑰上的朱砂叶螨雌成螨对阿维菌素与甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐产生了极高的抗药性,阿维菌素对2个地区的朱砂叶螨的LC50分别为40.25mg·L-1和19.67mg·L-1,相对毒力指数分别为敏感品系的2441.08倍和1192.86倍;甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐对其LC50分别为118.18mg·L-1和9.24mg·L-1,相对毒力指数是敏感品系的2805.73倍和219.35倍。昆明北郊的朱砂叶螨对溴虫腈的相对毒力指数是敏感品系的2371.40倍,呈贡和晋宁分别为162.01倍和173.38倍。丁醚脲对北郊、呈贡和晋宁朱砂叶螨的LC50分别为244.58mg·L-1、385.41mg·L-1和54.93mg·L-1,相对毒力指数在3.01倍～21.10倍之间。北郊、呈贡和晋宁的朱砂叶螨种群对炔螨特和哒螨灵的LC50分别为155.39mg·L-1、424.49mg·L-1和62.70mg·L-1,其相对毒力指数是敏感品系的6.45倍、17.63倍和2.60倍。朱砂叶螨对药剂抗药性水平趋势从高到低为:阿维菌素、甲氨基阿维菌素苯甲酸盐>溴虫腈、丁醚脲>炔螨特、哒螨灵,抗性最高的地区为昆明北郊,晋宁相对较低。     

High γ-aminobutyric acid content, a novel component associated with resistance to abamectin in Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval)

An abamectin-resistant strain of Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval) (Rf = 25.3) was selected in laboratory. We compared the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) content in abamectin-susceptible T. cinnabarinus individuals with that in resistant individuals and investigated its relationship to abamectin resistance. High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to ascertain GABA content in abamectin-susceptible (SS) and resistant (AR) strains of T. cinnabarinus. The results indicate that GABA content in the AR was significantly higher than that in the SS (1.39-fold). AR individuals treated with a sublethal dose of abamectin did not show significant differences in GABA levels compared with AR individuals that were not treated with abamectin. However in the SS, abamectin treated individuals had a significantly higher GABA content than those that were untreated (1.52-fold). Individuals in the SS that survived from selection with LC₉₅ of abamectin (SS-AR) showed significantly higher GABA levels compared to SS (1.41-fold). Similarly, progenies of the SS-AR parental generation (SS-ARF₁) also showed increased GABA levels (1.51-fold) compared to SS. In addition, behavioral observations have shown that all individuals from the AR, SS-AR and SS-ARF₁, which had more GABA content than the SS, demonstrated a significant decrease in crawling speed compared with SS individuals. This observation is consistent with excessive GABA levels had inhibitory effect on the central nervous system. Thus, we postulate that increasing GABA content in T. cinnabarinus is associated with resistance against abamectin.     

Influences of insecticides on toxicity and cuticular penetration of abamectin in Helicoverpa armigera

Synergistic actions for mixtures of abamectin with other insecticides in some insect pests were evaluated, and the possible synergistic mechanism was studied by the comparison in toxicity and cuticular penetration of abamectin between with and without other insecticides or synergists in Helicoverpa armigera larvae. The results of bioassay showed that horticultural mineral oil (HMO), hexaflumuron, chlorpyrifos, and some other insecticides were synergistic to abamectin with 152.0-420.0 of co-toxicity coefficient(CTC) in some agricultural insect pests. In topical application tests, HMO or piperonyl butoxide (PBO) increased the toxicity of abamectin in larvae of H. armigera, but the mortality was not affected by s,s,s-tributylphorotrithioate (DEF) and triphenylphosphate (TPP). The synergistic action of HMO was obviously higher than PBO, and when treated simultaneously with abamectin, HMO gave a more significant synergism than if treated 2 hours ahead. The highest synergistic effect (SE) was found in the mixture of ‘abamectin HMO (1:206)‘. The mortality did not increase or the toxicity drop, when a synergist or HMO was added into the mixture of ‘abamectin HMO‘ or ‘abamectin synergist‘, respectively. Results from the isotope tracing experiments showed that HMO significantly enhanced the penetration of ^3H-abamectin through the cuticle of H.armigera larvae, which resulted in the synergism of the mixture. The cuticular penetration of ^3H-abamectin was not accumulatively affected by chlorpyrifos, nor by hexaflumuron,though there was an inhibition within 30 seconds or 1 hour after treated by these two chemicals respectively. Results suggested that the synergism of abamectin mixed with hexaflumuron or chlorpyrifos might be related to inhibition of metabolic enzymes or target sites in the larvae.