Characterization of RNA aptamer binding by the Wilms' tumor suppressor protein WT1

The interaction of the zinc finger protein WT1 with RNA aptamers has been investigated using a quantitative binding assay, and the results have been compared to those from a previous study of the DNA binding properties of this protein. A recombinant peptide containing the four zinc fingers of WT1 (WT1-ZFP) binds to representatives of three specific families of RNA aptamers with apparent dissociation constants ranging from 13.8 +/- 1.1 to 87.4 +/- 10.4 nM, somewhat higher than the dissociation constant of 4.12 +/- 0.4 nM for binding to DNA. An isoform that contains an insertion of three amino acids between the third and fourth zinc fingers (WT1[+KTS]-ZFP) also binds to these RNAs with slightly reduced affinity (the apparent dissociation constants ranging from 22.8 to 69.8 nM) but does not bind to DNA. The equilibrium binding of WT1-ZFP to the highest-affinity RNA molecule was compared to the equilibrium binding to a consensus DNA molecule as a function of temperature, pH, monovalent salt concentration, and divalent salt concentration. The interaction of WT1-ZFP with both nucleic acids is an entropy-driven process. Binding of WT1-ZFP to RNA has a pH optimum that is narrower than that observed for binding to DNA. Binding of WT1-ZFP to DNA is optimal at 5 mM MgCl(2), while the highest affinity for RNA was observed in the absence of MgCl(2). Binding of WT1 to both nucleic acid ligands is sensitive to increasing monovalent salt concentration, with a greater effect observed for DNA than for RNA. Point mutations in the zinc fingers associated with Denys-Drash syndrome have dramatically different effects on the interaction of WT1-ZFP with DNA, but a consistent and modest effect on the interaction with RNA. The role of RNA sequence and secondary structure in the binding of WT1-ZFP was probed by site-directed mutagenesis. Results indicate that a hairpin loop is a critical structural feature required for protein binding, and that some consensus nucleotides can be substituted provided proper base pairing of the stem of the hairpin loop is maintained.     

A mutation outside the two zinc fingers of ADR1 can suppress defects in either finger.

A second-site mutation that restored DNA binding to ADR1 mutants altered at different positions in the two zinc fingers was identified. This mutation (called IS1) was a conservative change of arginine 91 to lysine in a region amino terminal to the two zinc fingers and known from previous experiments to be necessary for DNA binding. IS1 increased binding to the UAS1 sequence two- to sevenfold for various ADR1 mutants and twofold for wild-type ADR1. The change of arginine 91 to glycine decreased binding twofold, suggesting that this arginine is involved in DNA binding in the wild-type protein. The increase in binding by IS1 did not involve protein-protein interactions between the two ADR1 monomers, nor did it require the presence of the sequences flanking UAS1. However, the effect of IS1 was influenced by the sequence of the first finger, suggesting that interactions between the region amino terminal to the fingers and the fingers themselves could exist. A model for the role of the amino-terminal region based on these results and sequence homologies with other DNA-binding motifs is proposed.     

DNA-induced alpha-helix capping in conserved linker sequences is a determinant of binding affinity in Cys(2)-His(2) zinc fingers

High-affinity, sequence-specific DNA binding by Cys(2)-His(2) zinc finger proteins is mediated by both specific protein-base interactions and non-specific contacts between charged side-chains and the phosphate backbone. In addition, in DNA complexes of multiple zinc fingers, protein-protein interactions between the finger units contribute to the binding affinity. We present NMR evidence for another contribution to high- affinity binding, a highly specific DNA-induced helix capping involving residues in the linker sequence between fingers. Capping at the C terminus of the alpha-helix in each zinc finger, incorporating a consensus TGEKP linker sequence that follows each finger, provides substantial binding energy to the DNA complexes of zinc fingers 1-3 of TFIIIA (zf1-3) and the four zinc fingers of the Wilms' tumor suppressor protein (wt1-4). The same alpha-helix C-capping motif is observed in the X-ray structures of four other protein-DNA complexes. The structures of each of the TGEKP linkers in these complexes can be superimposed on the linker sequences in the zf1-3 complex, revealing a remarkable similarity in both backbone and side-chain conformations. The canonical linker structures from the zinc-finger-DNA complexes have been compared to the NMR structure of the TGEKP linker connecting fingers 1 and 2 in zf1-3 in the absence of DNA. This comparison reveals that additional stabilization likely arises in the DNA complexes from hydrogen bonding between the backbone amide of E3 and the side-chain O(gamma) of T1 in the linker. We suggest that these DNA-induced C-capping interactions provide a means whereby the multiple-finger complex, which must necessarily be domain-flexible in the unbound state as it searches for the correct DNA sequence, can be "snap-locked" in place once the correct DNA sequence is encountered. These observations provide a rationale for the high conservation of the TGEKP linker sequences in Cys(2)-His(2) zinc finger proteins.     

Differential binding of zinc fingers from Xenopus TFIIIA and p43 to 5S RNA and the 5S RNA gene.

Zinc fingers are usually associated with proteins that interact with DNA. Yet in two oocyte-specific Xenopus proteins, TFIIA and p43, zinc fingers are used to bind 5S RNA. One of these, TFIIIA, also binds the 5S RNA gene. Both proteins have nine zinc fingers that are nearly identical with respect to size and spacing. We have determined the relative affinities of groups of zinc fingers from TFIIIA for both 5S RNA and the 5S RNA gene. We have also determined the relative affinities of groups of zinc fingers from p43 for 5S RNA. The primary protein regions for RNA and DNA interaction in TFIIIA are located at opposite ends of the molecule. All zinc fingers from TFIIIA participate in binding 5S RNA, but zinc fingers from the C terminus have the highest affinity. N-terminal zinc fingers are essential for binding the 5S RNA gene. In contrast, zinc fingers at the amino terminus of p43 are essential for binding 5S RNA.     

The maize ID1 flowering time regulator is a zinc finger protein with novel DNA binding properties

The INDETERMINATE protein, ID1, plays a key role in regulating the transition to flowering in maize. ID1 is the founding member of a plant-specific zinc finger protein family that is defined by a highly conserved amino sequence called the ID domain. The ID domain includes a cluster of three different types of zinc fingers separated from a fourth C2H2 finger by a long spacer; ID1 is distinct from other ID domain proteins by having a much longer spacer. In vitro DNA selection and amplification binding assays and DNA binding experiments showed that ID1 binds selectively to an 11 bp consensus motif via the ID domain. Unexpectedly, site-directed mutagenesis of the ID1 protein showed that zinc fingers located at each end of the ID domain are not required for binding to the consensus motif despite the fact that one of these zinc fingers is a canonical C2H2 DNA binding domain. In addition, an ID1 in vitro deletion mutant that lacks the extra spacer between zinc fingers binds the same 11 bp motif as normal ID1, suggesting that all ID domain-containing proteins recognize the same DNA target sequence. Our results demonstrate that maize ID1 and ID domain proteins have novel zinc finger configurations with unique DNA binding properties.     

Selection of zinc fingers that bind single-stranded telomeric DNA in the G-quadruplex conformation

There is considerable interest in molecules that bind to telomeric DNA sequences and G-quadruplexes with specificity. Such molecules would be useful to test hypotheses for telomere length regulation, and may have therapeutic potential. The versatility and modular nature of the zinc finger motif makes it an ideal candidate for engineering G-quadruplex-binding proteins. Phage display technology has previously been widely used to screen libraries of zinc fingers for binding to novel duplex DNA sequences. In this study, a three-finger library has been screened for clones that bind to an oligonucleotide containing the human telomeric repeat sequence folded in the G-quadruplex conformation. The selected clones show a strong amino acid consensus, suggesting analogous modes of binding. Binding was found to be both sequence dependent and structure specific. This is the first example of an engineered protein that binds to G-quadruplex DNA, and represents a new type of binding interaction for a zinc finger protein.     

Sequence and structural requirements for high-affinity DNA binding by the WT1 gene product.

The Wilms' tumor suppressor gene, WT1, encodes a zinc finger polypeptide which plays a key role regulating cell growth and differentiation in the urogenital system. Using the whole-genome PCR approach, we searched murine genomic DNA for high-affinity WT1 binding sites and identified a 10-bp motif 5'GCGTGGGAGT3' which we term WTE). The WTE motif is similar to the consensus binding sequence 5'GCG(G/T)GGGCG3' recognized by EGR-1 and is also suggested to function as a binding site for WT1, setting up a competitive regulatory loop. To evaluate the underlying biochemical basis for such competition, we compared the binding affinities of WT1 and EGR1 for both sequences. WT1 shows a 20- to 30-fold-higher affinity for the WTE sequence compared with that of the EGR-1 binding motif. Mutational analysis of the WTE motif revealed a significant contribution to binding affinity by the adenine nucleotide at the eighth position (5'GCGTGGGAGT3') as well as by the 3'-most thymine (5'GCGTGGGAGT3'), whereas mutations in either flanking nucleotides or other nucleotides in the core sequence did not significantly affect the specific binding affinity. Mutations within WT1 zinc fingers II to IV abolished the sequence-specific binding of WT1 to WTE, whereas alterations within the first WT1 zinc finger reduced the binding affinity approximately 10-fold but did not abolish sequence recognition. We have thus identified a WT1 target, which, although similar in sequence to the EGR-1 motif, shows a 20- to 30-fold-higher affinity for WT1. These results suggest that physiological action of WT1 is mediated by binding sites of significantly higher affinity than the 9-bp EGR-1 binding motif. The role of the thymine base in contributing to binding affinity is discussed in the context of recent structural analysis.     

Multiconnection of identical zinc finger: implication for DNA binding affinity and unit modulation of the three zinc finger domain

Cys(2)-His(2)-type zinc finger proteins have a tandemly repeated array structure consisting of independent finger modules. They are expected to elevate the DNA binding affinity and specificity by increasing the number of finger modules. To investigate the relation between the number and the DNA binding affinity of the zinc finger, we have designed the two- to four-finger peptides by connecting the central zinc finger (finger 2) of Sp1 with the canonical linker sequence, Thr-Gly-Glu-Lys-Pro. Gel mobility shift assays reveal that the cognate three- and four-finger peptides, Sp1(zf222) and Sp1(zf2222), strongly bind to the predicted target sequences, but the two-finger peptide, Sp1(zf22), does not. Of special interest is the fact that the dissociation constant for Sp1(zf2222) binding to the target DNA is comparable to that for Sp1(zf222). The methylation interference, DNase I and hydroxyl radical footprintings, and circular permutation analyses demonstrate that Sp1(zf2222) binds to its target site with three successive zinc fingers and the binding of the fourth zinc finger is inhibited by DNA bending induced by the binding of the three-finger domain. The present results strongly indicate that the zinc finger protein binds to DNA by the three-finger domain as one binding unit. In addition, this information provides the basis for the design of a novel multifinger protein with high affinity and specificity for long DNA sequences, such as chromosomal DNAs.     

Effect of replacement of "zinc finger" zinc on estrogen receptor DNA interactions.

Exposure of bovine estrogen receptor to the metal chelators EDTA and 1,10-phenanthroline results in a loss of nonspecific DNA binding, presumably because of the removal of "zinc finger" zinc. Nonspecific DNA binding, as measured by a DNA-cellulose binding assay, can be restored by dialysis of the aporeceptor against buffer containing zinc, cadmium, and cobalt but not with buffer containing copper or nickel. More detailed studies were carried out using a bacterially expressed polypeptide encompassing the DNA binding domain of the human estrogen receptor. Apopolypeptide fails to bind DNA specifically, as measured by mobility shift assay using a consensus estrogen response element hexamer containing oligonucleotide, but DNA binding was restored by dialysis of the apopolypeptide against buffer containing zinc, cadmium, and cobalt but not with buffer containing copper or nickel. Dissociation constants of zinc- and cadmium-reconstituted polypeptide for the estrogen response element hexamer (66 and 48 nM, respectively) are virtually indistinguishable from native polypeptide (Kd = 48 nM) whereas cobalt-reconstituted polypeptide has a lower affinity (Kd = 720 nM). However, native, zinc-, cadmium-, and cobalt-reconstituted polypeptides gave identical results in a methylation interference assay. Competition experiments with zinc and copper or nickel suggest that copper and nickel are able to bind to zinc finger residues but do so nonproductively. The relative affinities copper greater than cadmium greater than zinc greater than cobalt greater than nickel for the polypeptide were determined by a zinc blot competition assay. The ability of cadmium and cobalt to substitute for zinc in the zinc fingers demonstrates a structural "flexibility" in the DNA binding domain as each of these metals has slightly different ionic radii. On the other hand, subtle differences in DNA binding affinity and/or specificity could exist, which may not be detectable here. Also, the ability of metals to substitute for zinc in the DNA binding domain suggests that metal substitution in these zinc fingers in vivo may be of relevance to the toxicity and/or carcinogenicity of some of these metals.