Drinking,but not feeding,is opiate-sensitive in hamsters

The long-lasting opiate antagonist, naltrexone (NTX), was examined for its effects on various types of consummatory behavior in male golden hamsters and rats. Rat, but not hamster, 24 hr food and water intakes were significantly decreased by four daily NTX (10.0 mg/kg) injections. Hamsters displayed a minimal night to day feeding ratio compared to rats. hamsters increased food intake following insulin (50 U/kg) administration, but not after 24 hr food deprivation (FD) or 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG; 800 mg/kg) injections. NTX (1.0 and 10 mg/kg) had no effect on feeding, but markedly attenuated hamster drinking induced by 48 hr water deprivation or hypertonic saline injection. Dexamethasone (DEX), a glucocorticoid which depletes pituitary β-endorphin and produces anorexia in rats, had no effect on daily hamster intake. Since the normal feeding profile of the hamster is similar to that of naloxone and DEX-treated rats, hamsters appear to lack an opiate-sensitive feeding system. In contrast, stimulated drinking behavior of hamsters operates through an opiate-sensitive mechanism. Thus, there are marked species differences concerning the involvement of endogenous opioids is consummatory behavior.     

Role of NPY and its receptor subtypes in foraging, food hoarding, and food intake by Siberian hamsters

Fasting has widespread physiological and behavioral effects such as increases in arcuate nucleus neuropeptide Y (NPY) gene expression in rodents, including Siberian hamsters. Fasting also stimulates foraging and food hoarding (appetitive ingestive behaviors) by Siberian hamsters but does relatively little to change food intake (consummatory ingestive behavior). Therefore, we tested the effects of third ventricular NPY Y1 ([Pro(34)]NPY) or Y5 ([D-Trp(34)]NPY) receptor agonists on these ingestive behaviors using a wheel running-based food delivery system coupled with simulated burrow housing. Siberian hamsters had 1) no running wheel access and free food, 2) running wheel access and free food, or 3) foraging requirements (10 or 50 revolutions/pellet). NPY (1.76 nmol) stimulated food intake only during the first 4 h postinjection ( approximately 200-1,000%) and mostly in hamsters with a foraging requirement. The Y1 receptor agonist markedly increased food hoarding (250-1,000%), increased foraging as well as wheel running per se, and had relatively little effect on food intake (<250%). Unlike NPY, the Y5 agonist significantly increased food intake, especially in foraging animals ( approximately 225-800%), marginally increased food hoarding (250-500%), and stimulated foraging and wheel running 4-24 h postinjection, with the distribution of earned pellets favoring eating versus hoarding across time. Across treatments, food hoarding predominated early postinjection, whereas food intake tended to do so later. Collectively, NPY stimulated both appetitive and consummatory ingestive behaviors in Siberian hamsters involving Y1/Y5 receptors, with food hoarding and foraging/wheel running (appetitive) more involved with Y1 receptors and food intake (consummatory) with Y5 receptors.     

Pertussis toxin inhibits neuropeptide Y-induced feeding in rats

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is the most powerful peptide drug stimulating feeding in rats. Rats with paraventricular hypothalamic (PVH) cannulae were used to investigate the mechanisms involved in NPY-induced feeding. Consistent with previous reports, injection of 2 μg of NPY into the PVH significantly increased the cumulative food intake over 1-, 2- and 4-hr periods. Ad lib feeding decreased significantly two days after pertussis toxin (PT) administration, but recovered to nearly normal levels on the fourth day. PT had no immediate effect on NPY-induced feeding; however, four days after PT was injected NPY (2 μg) did not increase the food intake compared to control. In vitro investigations showed that isoproterenol-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in the hypothalamus of control rats was inhibited by NPY. In PT-treated rats, however, no inhibition of cAMP production was observed. These results suggest that cAMP may mediate NPY-induced feeding and that a PT-sensitive G protein may be involved in this signal transduction.     

Neuropeptide Y inhibits estrous behavior and stimulates feeding via separate receptors in Syrian hamsters

Central injections of neuropeptide Y (NPY) increase food intake in Syrian hamsters; however, the effect of NPY on sexual behavior in hamsters is not known nor are the receptor subtypes involved in feeding and sexual behaviors. We demonstrate that NPY inhibits lordosis duration in a dose-related fashion after lateral ventricular injection in ovariectomized, steroid-primed Syrian hamsters. Under the same conditions, we compared the effect of two receptor-differentiating agonists derived from peptide YY (PYY), PYY-(3-36) and [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY, on lordosis duration and food intake. PYY-(3-36) produced a 91% reduction in lordosis duration at 0.24 nmol. [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY was less potent, producing a reduction in lordosis duration (66%) only at 2.4 nmol. These results suggest NPY effects on estrous behavior are principally mediated by Y2 receptors. PYY-(3-36) and [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY stimulated comparable dose-related increases in total food intake (2 h), suggesting Y5 receptors are involved in feeding. The significance of different NPY receptor subtypes controlling estrous and feeding behavior is highlighted by results on expression of Fos immunoreactivity (Fos-IR) elicited by either PYY-(3-36) or [Leu(31),Pro(34)]PYY at a dose of each that differentiated between the two behaviors. Some differences were seen in the distribution of Fos-IR produced by the two peptides. Overall, however, the patterns of expression were similar. Our behavioral and anatomic results suggest that NPY-containing pathways controlling estrous and feeding behavior innervate similar nuclei, with the divergence in pathways controlling the separate behaviors characterized by linkage to different NPY receptor subtypes.     

Third ventricular coinjection of subthreshold doses of NPY and AgRP stimulate food hoarding and intake and neural activation

We previously demonstrated that 3rd ventricular (3V) neuropeptide Y (NPY) or agouti-related protein (AgRP) injection potently stimulates food foraging/hoarding/intake in Siberian hamsters. Because NPY and AgRP are highly colocalized in arcuate nucleus neurons in this and other species, we tested whether subthreshold doses of NPY and AgRP coinjected into the 3V stimulates food foraging, hoarding, and intake, and/or neural activation [c-Fos immunoreactivity (c-Fos-ir)] in hamsters housed in a foraging/hoarding apparatus. In the behavioral experiment, each hamster received four 3V treatments by using subthreshold doses of NPY and AgRP for all behaviors: 1) NPY, 2) AgRP, 3) NPY+AgRP, and 4) saline with a 7-day washout period between treatments. Food foraging, intake, and hoarding were measured 1, 2, 4, and 24 h and 2 and 3 days postinjection. Only when NPY and AgRP were coinjected was food intake and hoarding increased. After identical treatment in separate animals, c-Fos-ir was assessed at 90 min and 14 h postinjection, times when food intake (0-1 h) and hoarding (4-24 h) were uniquely stimulated. c-Fos-ir was increased in several hypothalamic nuclei previously shown to be involved in ingestive behaviors and the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), but only in NPY+AgRP-treated animals (90 min and 14 h: magno- and parvocellular regions of the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus and perifornical area; 14 h only: CeA and sub-zona incerta). These results suggest that NPY and AgRP interact to stimulate food hoarding and intake at distinct times, perhaps released as a cocktail naturally with food deprivation to stimulate these behaviors.     

Paraventricular nucleus injections of peptide YY and neuropeptide Y preferentially enhance carbohydrate ingestion

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) injected into the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) is known to elicit a powerful feeding response in satiated, brain-cannulated rats [41, 42, 43]. The present experiment investigates the effect of peptide YY (PYY), a structurally-related peptide, on feeding behavior and, in addition, the effects of both PYY and NPY on the pattern of macronutrient selection. Injection of PYY directly into the PVN, in doses ranging from 7.8 to 235 pmol/0.3 μl, caused a strong, dose-dependent stimulation of feeding behavior, as well as a small stimulation of drinking behavior, in satiated rats. The mean latency to eat was 9.3 min, with substantial feeding occurring within 30 min of the injection. At low doses, the increase in feeding was seen predominantly during the first hr. At the highest dose, in contrast, food intake continued to increase progressively over the next few hr, such that by 4 hr postinjection food intake was more than 20 g over vehicle baseline. In 1 hr tests with 3 pure macronutrient (protein, fat and carbohydrate) diets simulataneously available, PYY and NPY (78 pmol/0.3 μl) both elicited a strong and selective increase in carbohydrate consumption, with little or no effect on protein or fat consumption. These results suggest that hypothalamic receptors sensitive to PYY and NPY may participate in the control of carbohydrate consumption.     

The Stimulatory Effect of Cerebral Intraventricular Injection of cNPY on Precocial Feeding Behavior in Neonatal Chicks (Gallus domesticus)

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is one of the most potent stimulants of food intake in many animals. Most of the supporting evidence for the effects of NPY has been gathered in mammalian species using porcine NPY. To investigate the effects of NPY on precocial feeding initiation in chicks, we firstly used chicken NPY (cNPY) to study its role in food intake and spontaneous activities in 3-day-old male chicks. Food intake was monitored at different times after intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of cNPY (2.5, 5.0 or 10.0 μg/10 μL) and anti-cNPY antibody (anti-cNPY) (1:9000, 1:3000 or 1:1000 in dilution). cNPY given at different doses significantly increased food intake at 30 min, 60 min, 90 min and 120 min after injection. Chicks treated with 5.0 μg/10 μL of cNPY showed a maximal 4.48 fold increase in food intake comparing to the control at 30 min. There is still more than 2 fold increase in food intake at 120 min after injection of cNPY. Food intake was significantly inhibited by a single ICV injection of anti-cNPY diluted to 1:9000 (60% inhibition), 1:3000 (92% inhibition), and 1:1000 (95% inhibition) at 30 min with 1:1000 being the maximally effective concentration. The inhibitory effects of anti-cNPY (diluted to1:9000, 1:3000, 1:1000) at 120 min post ICV injection were 22%, 42% and 46%, respectively. But ICV of anti-cNPY (1:3000 in dilution) did not block the orexigenic effect of 2.5 μg/10 μL of cNPY. ICV injection of different concentrations of cNPY increases locomotor activity in a dose-dependent manner while ICV anti-cNPY greatly decreased the distance moved by each chick compared to control groups. Taken together, our results demonstrated that cNPY has a promoting effect on chick food intake and locomotor activity, and that endogenous cNPY might play a positive role in regulating precocial feeding behavior in newly hatched chicks.     

Neuropeptide Y: stimulation of feeding and drinking by injection into the paraventricular nucleus

Neuropeptide Y (NPY), a peptide contained within numerous presynaptic terminals in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN), was injected directly into the PVN of satiated, brain-cannulated rats, and food and water intake were measured 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 hrs postinjection. Neuropeptide Y (24 and 78 pmoles/0.3 microliter isotonic saline) caused a dose-dependent increase in food intake, as well as a small, dose-dependent increase in water intake. This effect on feeding occurred even when food was not presented until 4 hrs postinjection. To determine the behavioral specificity of this effect, the impact of PVN injection of NPY (78 pmoles) on various behaviors was observed. With food available, only feeding and drinking behavior were affected. No change in other behaviors, including grooming, rearing, sleeping, resting or different levels of activity, was observed. With food absent, NPY still elicited drinking, suggesting that this is a primary effect, rather than secondary to the feeding. In addition to drinking, NPY reliably increased activity while decreasing sleep and grooming. These results suggest an important role for hypothalamic NPY, or a structurally-related peptide, in the regulation of feeding and drinking behavior.     

NPY Y1 receptor is involved in ghrelin- and fasting-induced increases in foraging, food hoarding, and food intake

Fasting triggers a constellation of physiological and behavioral changes, including increases in peripherally produced ghrelin and centrally produced hypothalamic neuropeptide Y (NPY). Refeeding stimulates food intake in most species; however, hamsters primarily increase foraging and food hoarding with smaller increases in food intake. Fasting-induced increases in foraging and food hoarding in Siberian hamsters are mimicked by peripheral ghrelin, central NPY, and NPY Y1 receptor agonist injections. Because fasting stimulates ghrelin and subsequently NPY synthesis/release, it may be that fasting-induced increased hoarding is mediated by NPY Y1 receptor activation. Therefore, we asked: Can an Y1 receptor antagonist block fasting- or ghrelin-induced increases in foraging, food hoarding, and food intake? This was accomplished by injecting the NPY Y1 receptor antagonist 1229U91 intracerebroventricularly in hamsters fasted, fed, or given peripheral ghrelin injections and housed in a running wheel-based food delivery foraging system coupled with simulated-burrow housing. Three foraging conditions were used: 1) no running wheel access, free food, 2) running wheel access, free food, or 3) foraging requirement (10 revolutions/pellet) for food. Fasting was a more potent stimulator of foraging and food hoarding than ghrelin. Concurrent injections of 1229U91 completely blocked fasting- and ghrelin-induced increased foraging and food intake and attenuated, but did not always completely block, fasting- and ghrelin-induced increases in food hoarding. Collectively, these data suggest that the NPY Y1 receptor is important for the effects of ghrelin- and fasting-induced increases in foraging and food intake, but other NPY receptors and/or other neurochemical systems are involved in increases in food hoarding.     

MK-329 blocks the inhibition of alcohol intake by CCK-8

Peripheral administration of sulfated cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8) potently reduces alcohol intake, preference, and blood levels in rats. MK-329 (L-364,718 or Devazepide) acts at peripheral cholecystokinin (CCK_A) receptors to antagonize CCK-8's physiological and behavioral effects, such as pancreatic stimulation and inhibition of feeding. We determined whether CCK_A receptor blockade would also prevent CCK-8's alcohol satiety effect. Water-deprived female and male rats (n = 7 for each) received randomized combinations of intraperitoneal injections of MK-329 (0, 100, 200, or 400 μg/kg) followed by CCK-8 (0 or 4 μg/kg). Rats were then given access to 5% w/v ethanol for 30 min, followed by 30-min access to water, with food ad lib. MK-329 at all doses significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the suppression of alcohol intake and food intake by CCK-8. MK-329 alone increased alcohol intake at 400 μg/kg, and increased food intake, in females and males at 100 and 200 μg/kg, respectively. We concluded that CCK-8's alcohol and food satiation effects depend on specific, peripheral CCK_A receptors, and satiation of alcohol consumption and drinking-associated feeding reflect an endogenous functional interaction of CCK-8 with CCK_A receptors.     

Neuropeptide-Y in the paraventricular nucleus increases ethanol self-administration

The paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of the hypothalamus is known to modulate feeding, obesity, and ethanol intake. Neuropeptide-Y (NPY), which is released endogenously by neurons projecting from the arcuate nucleus to the PVN, is one of the most potent stimulants of feeding behavior known. The role of NPY in the PVN on ethanol self-administration is unknown. To address this issue, rats were trained to self-administer ethanol via a sucrose fading procedure and injector guide cannulae aimed at the PVN were surgically implanted. Microinjections of NPY and NPY antagonists in the PVN were conducted prior to ethanol self-administration sessions. All doses of NPY significantly increased ethanol self-administration and preference, and decreased water intake. The NPY antagonist D-NPY partially reduced ethanol self-administration and completely blocked the effects of an intermediate dose of NPY (10 fmol) on ethanol intake, preference, and water intake. The competitive non-peptide Y1 receptor antagonist BIBP 3226 did not significantly alter ethanol self-administration or water intake when administered alone in the PVN but it completely blocked the effect of NPY (10 fmol) on ethanol intake. NPY infused in the PVN had no effect on ethanol self-administration when tested in rats that did not have a long history of ethanol self-administration. The doses of NPY tested produced no effect on food intake or body weight measured during the 24-h period after infusion in either ethanol-experienced or ethanol-inexperienced rats. These results indicate that elevation of NPY levels in the PVN potently increases ethanol self-administration and that this effect is mediated through NPY Y1 receptors.     

Regulation of food intake by neuropeptide Y in goldfish

In mammals, neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a potent orexigenic factor. In the present study, third brain ventricle (intracerebroventricular) injection of goldfish NPY (gNPY) caused a dose-dependent increase in food intake in goldfish, and intracerebroventricular administration of NPY Y1-receptor antagonist BIBP-3226 decreased food intake; the actions of gNPY were blocked by simultaneous injection of BIBP-3226. Goldfish maintained on a daily scheduled feeding regimen display an increase in NPY mRNA levels in the telencephalon-preoptic area and hypothalamus shortly before feeding; however, a decrease occured in optic tectum-thalamus. In both fed and unfed fish, brain NPY mRNA levels decreased after scheduled feeding. Restriction in daily food ration intake for 1 wk or food deprivation for 72 h resulted in increased brain NPY mRNA levels. Results from these studies demonstrate that NPY is a physiological brain signal involved in feeding behavior in goldfish, mediating its effects, at least in part, through Y1-like receptors in the brain.     

Attenuated feeding responses to circadian and palatability cues in mice lacking neuropeptide Y

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) is a potent orexigenic peptide that is implicated in the feeding response to a variety of stimuli. The current studies employed mice lacking NPY (Npy−/−) and their wild-type (Npy+/+) littermates to investigate the role of this peptide in the feeding response to circadian and palatability cues. To investigate the response to a circadian stimulus, we assessed food intake during the 4-h period following dark onset, a time of day characterized by maximal rates of food consumption. Compared to Npy+/+ controls, intake of Npy−/− mice was reduced by 33% during this period (0.6 ± 0.1 g versus 0.9 ± 0.1 g; p ≤ 0.05). In contrast, intake did not differ between genotypes when measured over a 24-h period (3.7 ± 0.2 g versus 3.5 ± 0.3 g; p = ns). Furthermore, reduced dark cycle 4 h food intake in Npy−/− mice was not evident after a 24-h fast (1.4 ± 0.1 g for both genotypes; p = ns), despite a pronounced delay in the initiation of feeding (636 ± 133 s versus 162 ± 29 s; p ≤ 0.05). To investigate the role of NPY in the feeding response to palatability cues, mice were presented with a highly palatable diet (HP) for 1 h each day (in addition to having ad libitum access to chow) for 18 days. Npy+/+ mice rapidly increased daily HP intake such that by the end of the first week, they derived a substantial fraction of daily energy from this source (41 ± 3%). By comparison, HP intake was markedly reduced in Npy−/− mice during the first week (24 ± 7% of daily energy intake, p ≤ 0.05 versus Npy+/+), although it eventually increased (by Day 9) to values comparable to those of Npy+/+ controls. These experiments suggest that NPY contributes to the mechanism whereby food intake increases in response to circadian and palatability cues and that mechanisms driving food intake in response to these stimuli differ from those activated by energy restriction.     

Analysis of neuropeptide Y-induced feeding: dissociation of Y1 and Y2 receptor effects on natural meal patterns.

To differentiate NPY receptor subtypes, Y₁ and Y₂, in terms of their impact on feeding behavior, the intact molecule NPY(1–36) and the 3 fragments, NPY(2–36), the Y₁ agonist [Leu³¹,Pro³⁴]NPY, and the Y₂ agonist NPY(13–36), were injected (100 pmol/0.3 μl) into the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) of freely feeding rats. A computer-automated data acquisition system was employed in these experiments to permit a detailed analysis of feeding over the 12-h nocturnal cycle, in animals maintained on pure macronutrient diets. The results demonstrate that: 1) NPY(1–36) potentiates feeding behavior, primarily carbohydrate ingestion, by increasing the size and duration of the first meal after injection, rather than by affecting meal number or feeding rate, suggesting that NPY acts through mechanisms of satiety. The potentiation of carbohydrate intake occurs in association with a suppression of protein intake, which is strongest during the second meal after injection and which further increases the proportion of carbohydrate in the diet. No changes in fat ingestion are seen. 2) NPY(2–36), with the N-terminal tyrosine residue deleted, is equally potent to NPY(1–36) in potentiating carbohydrate intake and increasing meal size; however, it is less selective than NPY(1–36), producing an additional, smaller increase in consumption of protein. 3) The stimulatory effect of these peptides on carbohydrate intake and meal size is similarly observed, with somewhat reduced potency, after PVN injection of the selective Y₁ agonist [Leu³¹,Pro³⁴]NPY which, like NPY(1–36), also reduces protein intake. 4) The Y₂ receptor agonist, NPY(13–36), causes a decrease in the ingestion of carbohydrate, a smaller decline in protein intake, and a reduction in meal size. It is proposed that hypothalamic Y₁ receptors mediate the stimulatory effect of NPY on carbohydrate intake and meal size, while Y₂ receptors have the opposite effect of suppressing carbohydrate intake, possibly by altering presynaptic release of monoamines known to influence nutrient ingestion.     

Interactions between orexin A, NPY and galanin in the control of food intake of the goldfish, Carassius auratus

The neuropeptides orexin A (OXA), neuropeptide Y (NPY) and galanin (GAL) have been shown to play a role in the regulation of food intake in mammals. They also significantly stimulate feeding in goldfish. In order to assess the interactions between these peptides in the control of feeding in goldfish, we investigated the effects of central injection of specific receptor antagonists for NPY (BIBP 3226) and GAL (M40) on OXA-induced feeding and the effects of desensitization of orexin receptors on NPY- and GAL-induced feeding. We investigated the effects of BIBP 3226 on GAL-induced feeding and the effects of M40 on NPY-induced feeding. We also examined the effects of coinjection of each pair of neuropeptides on feeding behavior. Injections of 10 ng/g OXA, 5 ng/g NPY and 10 ng/g GAL each induced an increase in feeding. Fish treated with 5 ng/g BIBP or 20 ng/g M40 had food consumption similar to saline controls. BIBP at 5 ng/g significantly reduced NPY- and OXA-induced feeding. Injections of 20 ng/g M40 significantly decreased GAL-induced feeding, but had no effect on OXA-induced feeding. Blocking of orexin receptors by treatment with high doses of OXA (100 ng/g) resulted in a decrease in both NPY- and GAL-induced feeding. Coinjection with 0.5 ng/g OXA and either 0.5 ng/g NPY or 0.5 ng/g GAL resulted in a food intake higher than that observed in saline control fish and in fish treated with NPY or GAL alone at 0.5 ng/g. NPY mRNA expression was increased in the telencephalon and in the hypothalamus compared to saline-treated fish, following injection of OXA. These results indicate that both NPY and GAL are at least, in part, dependent on coaction with OXA for the stimulation of food intake and feeding behavior in goldfish. In addition, the effects of OXA are mediated, in part, by the NPY pathway. This suggests a functional interdependence between these three peptidergic systems in the control of energy balance in goldfish.     

Continuous intraventricular infusion of neuropeptide Y evokes episodic food intake in satiated female rats: effects of adrenalectomy and cholecystokinin

In these studies the pattern of feeding behavior during continuous intraventricular (IVT) infusion of NPY for 4 hr in the satiated female rat was monitored. Whereas saline infusion was ineffective, each of the three doses of NPY (117, 470 or 1175 pmol/hr) increased feeding during the entire 4 hr infusion and 2 hr postinfusion period. The cumulative food intake at the end of 4 hr of NPY infusion was enhanced in a dose-related fashion between 0, 117 and 470 pmol/hr; at 1175 pmol/hr food intake plateaued. In addition, the latency to initiate feeding response decreased in a dose-related fashion and feeding occurred in discrete (35-45) episodes during the 4 hr infusion period. Further, the total time feeding and local eating rate (g/min) increased significantly in response to the higher rates of NPY infusion. Concurrent infusion of cholecystokinin (CCK) at either equimolar or 2.5 x NPY dose, affected neither the NPY-induced cumulative food intake nor any other parameter of feeding behavior. On the other hand, cumulative food intake was significantly decreased in adrenalectomized rats in response to NPY infusion (470 pmol/hr); a response due primarily to a marked suppression in some, and almost complete cessation of food consumption in other rats during the second 2 hr period of NPY infusion. These studies show that continuous central infusion of NPY can produce sustained, intermittent feeding behavior and adrenalectomy significantly curtailed the duration of NPY effectiveness.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Adrenal modulation of the inhibitory effect of corticotropin releasing factor on feeding

Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) reduces food intake in rats after central administration. In these studies we examined whether the adrenal gland and the vagus were involved in CRF suppression of intake. One hour intake was reduced by a 5 μg (ICV) injection of CRF in sham but not adrenalectomized rats maintained on 0.9% NaCl. In a separate experiment on rats maintained on tap water, the inhibitory effect of CRF (5 μg) lasted at least 4 hours in sham rats whereas adrenalectomized rats did not significantly differ from controls. These experiments suggest that the adrenal gland modulates the feeding response to CRF. As replacement with corticosterone (0.75 mg/kg) in total adrenalectomized rats did not restore responsiveness to 5 or 10 μg of CRF, we next studied whether the adrenal medulla was responsible for the decreased responsiveness to CRF. In rats lacking the adrenal medulla only, food intake was reduced by a 5 μg injection of CRF; in sham rats, intake was significantly reduced by doses as low as 0.1 μg of CRF. An additional experiment examined the effect of gastric vagotomy on the CRF feeding response. Vagotomized rats were as responsive to 5 and 10 μg injections of CRF as sham rats, which suggests that the effect is not dependent on the vagus nerve. These findings indicate that the adrenal gland, primarily the medulla, plays an intermediate role in the reduction of food intake caused by central injections of CRF. This conclusion is consistent with the known effect of CRF on adrenomedullary discharge.     

NPY receptors and opioidergic system are involved in NPY-induced feeding in goldfish

The present study evaluated the effects of both intraperitoneal (i.p. ) and intracerebroventricular administration of selective Y(1) [(Leu(31), Pro(34))-NPY] and Y(2) [(Pro(13), Tyr(36))-NPY (13-36)] receptor agonists on food intake in satiated goldfish. Food intake (FI) was significantly increased by central administration of the Y(1) agonist (1 microg), but not by the Y(2) agonist, at 2 h postinjection. The feeding increase induced by (Leu(31), Pro(34))-NPY was in a similar magnitude to that obtained after ICV injection of the neuropeptide Y, and both feeding stimulations were reversed by the NPY (27-36), a general NPY antagonist. The i.p. administration of the agonists either did not significantly modify (Y(2) agonist) or decreased (Y(1) agonist) food intake in goldfish. These data indicate that it is the Y(1)-like (similar to Y(1) and/or Y(5)) receptor, and not Y(2), that is involved in the central modulation of the feeding behavior in goldfish. We also investigated the possible involvement of opioid peptides as mediators of the NPY stimulatory action on food intake in goldfish. The ICV administration of naloxone (10 microg), a general opioid antagonist, blocked the NPY-induced feeding in goldfish, suggesting that the opioidergic system is involved in feeding regulation by NPY.     

The role of cholecystokinin octapeptide in the central control of food intake in the dog

Cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8, 1, 190 pmol/5 min) decreased food intake and water consumption in two models of ingestive behavior, i.e., food deprivation-induced feeding and insulin-induced feeding, when administered into the third (3V) and lateral (LV) cerebral ventricles. In fasted dogs, the suppression of food intake was more prominent after 3V CCK-8, whereas intravenously administered CCK-8 was without effect. Neuropeptide Y (NPY, 1, 190 pmol) had no significant stimulatory effect on food intake and water consumption in fasted as well as satiated dogs, and actually reduced both food and water intake in insulin-treated dogs. There was a slight but significant decrease in food and water intake after 275 nmol naloxone administration in both feeding models, and some of the dogs vomited. In insulin-treated animals, CCK-8 reversed, but NPY potentiated the hypothermic phase of temperature response observed after saline administration, whereas naloxone failed to alter rectal temperature. These results suggest that the effect of CCK-8 on feeding seems to involve central mechanisms in the dog, and that the mechanisms by which CCK-8, NPY and naloxone affect feeding behavior are different.