Combined use of ultrasonic liposuction with the pull-through technique for the treatment of gynecomastia

The authors present a method of treatment for gynecomastia that combines the use of two techniques of soft-tissue contouring. This method uses ultrasonic liposuction in conjunction with the pull-through technique of direct excision to effectively remove the fibrofatty tissue of the male breast and the fibrous breast bud through a single 1-cm incision. Fifteen patients were treated in this fashion, and each patient demonstrated a smooth, masculine breast contour with a well-concealed scar, which eliminates the stigma of breast surgery. The procedure is technically straightforward and provides consistent results. It is offered as an additional option for the treatment of gynecomastia.     

Ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty treatment for axillary bromidrosis: clinical experience of 375 cases

Bromidrosis is a condition of abnormal offensive body odor caused mostly by apocrine gland secretion from the axilla. Although no morbid sequelae are known, the odor can be disturbing enough to cause social impairment and psychological distress. Medical care is available but is temporary and yields limited clinical benefit. Surgical treatment may provide a more definite remedy through reduction of the apocrine gland. However, there are risks for complication following surgical treatment such as subdermal excision, subcutaneous shaving, en bloc excision, and liposuction. The search for a less invasive but still effective procedure has led the authors to use ultrasound-assisted liposuction, which has reduced the risk of complication and recurrence. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the long-term outcome of ultrasound-assisted liposuction for the treatment of bromidrosis. From August 1998 to September 2002, 375 consecutive patients underwent ultrasound-assisted liposuction for bromidrosis of the axilla. The average age of the patients was 25.7 years (range, 15 to 55 years) and the average follow-up period was 18.8 months (range, 7 to 56 months). Subjective complaints of recurrences were noted in 22 patients (5.9 percent) and secondary ultrasound-assisted liposuction was performed, resulting in no further complaints. Complications other than recurrences were mild skin sloughing (3.2 percent), hematoma (1.3 percent), subcutaneous band (0.3 percent), and hypesthesia of the hand (0.3 percent), all of which healed spontaneously. Through a questionnaire that was answered by 264 patients, a subjective satisfaction rate was measured. Among the completed questionnaires, 91.7 percent reported satisfactory reduction of odor. Ultrasound-assisted liposuction to treat bromidrosis of the axilla provides advantages such as rapid recovery, less restriction of movement, unnoticeable scars, and a low rate of recurrence. The long-term outcome supports the benefits of this procedure. The authors recommend the use of ultrasound-assisted liposuction as first-line treatment for bromidrosis of the axilla.     

Effect of liposuction on skin perfusion

Clinical reports of full-thickness skin necrosis have raised concern about the thermal and dermal ischemic effects of ultrasound-assisted liposuction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate skin perfusion in patients treated with ultrasound-assisted liposuction or suction-assisted liposuction. Patients (n = 75) were studied prospectively in the perioperative period surrounding their suction-assisted liposuction (31 patients) or ultrasound-assisted liposuction (64 patients). The laser Doppler flowmeter was used to monitor skin perfusion in the treated regions preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively at a series of time intervals. The effects of the anesthetic, wetting solution, and type of liposuction (suction-assisted liposuction or ultrasound-assisted liposuction) on skin perfusion were measured. Anesthetic induction significantly increased measured skin perfusion. Wetting solution infusion significantly decreased skin perfusion (-57.4 percent +/- 2.0) by 15 minutes postinfusion. Skin perfusion in the ultrasound-assisted liposuction group was significantly greater than that of the suction-assisted liposuction patients at 1 hour, 1 day, and 1 week postoperatively; however, by 2 to 5 weeks, no difference in skin perfusion was noted and skin perfusion had returned to preoperative levels in both groups. Although skin perfusion in the suction-assisted liposuction group was significantly lower than in the ultrasound-assisted liposuction group in the early postoperative period, no differences in skin perfusion between the groups were noted beyond 1 week postoperatively, suggesting that neither technique impairs perfusion.     

Comparative lipoplasty analysis of in vivo-treated adipose tissue

A comparative histologic and chemical analysis was undertaken of adipose tissue treated in vivo with traditional, ultrasound-assisted, and external ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. A series of six healthy women undergoing elective liposuction according to the superwet technique using a 1:1 infiltration ratio with the estimated quantity of fat to be removed was included in the study. Four separate regions on each patient were treated independently in vivo with traditional liposuction, internal ultrasound-assisted liposuction, or external ultrasound-assisted liposuction for 7 minutes. External massage was used as a control. Four separate specimens of adipose tissue from each patient were assessed for cellular disruption using blinded histologic evaluation. The remainder of tissue was centrifuged to separate the aqueous phase from the cellular components and then spectrophotometrically analyzed for creatinine kinase and glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity as markers of cellular disruption. Histologic analysis confirmed 70 to 90 percent cellular disruption with internal ultrasound-assisted liposuction. Suction-assisted and external ultrasound-assisted liposuction showed 5 to 25 percent disruption, whereas massage controls showed only 5 percent. Only internal ultrasound-assisted liposuction showed 5 to 20 percent thermal liquefaction. Absorbance analysis showed creatine kinase activity (sigma units) greatest in ultrasound-exposed tissue. Both external and internal ultrasound-assisted liposuction gave creatine kinase levels 28 to 33 percent greater than suction-assisted liposuction, which varied only 10 percent from controls. Glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity was 44 percent greater for internal ultrasound-assisted liposuction than that detected with suction-assisted liposuction. Glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity with external ultrasound-assisted liposuction and massage did not vary much from each other, at only 14 percent and 11 percent activity compared with internal ultrasound-assisted liposuction, respectively. Histologic and enzyme analysis of the different types of liposuction and their effect on adipocyte cellular disruption revealed no significant effect of external ultrasound or massage on the adipocytes. Further experimental studies are necessary to evaluate the role and efficacy of alternative techniques for body contouring.     

Minimal surgical access to treat gynecomastia with the use of a power-assisted arthroscopic-endoscopic cartilage shaver

Gynecomastia is the most common benign condition of the male breast. The authors present a new method of treatment for gynecomastia that combines traditional liposuction in conjunction with a shaver technique to effectively remove the fibrofatty and the glandular tissues of the male breast and avoid areolar incisions. Twenty-five patients were treated in this fashion, and each patient demonstrated a smooth, masculine breast contour with well-concealed scars in the inframammary folds, eliminating the stigma of breast surgery. The procedure is technically straightforward and provides consistent results. It is offered as an additional option for the treatment of gynecomastia.     

Circumferential suction lipectomy of the trunk with anterior rectus fascia plication through a periumbilical incision: an alternative to conventional abdominoplasty

During the past decade, many combinations of operative techniques for abdominoplasty have evolved to suit the individual requirements of the patient. The purpose of this study was to present a safe alternative to conventional abdominoplasty for appropriate patients, namely, those with minimal skin laxity, moderate fatty tissue distribution, musculofascial diastases, and no concern for abdominal stretch marks. The procedure consists of circumferential ultrasound-assisted liposuction and direct abdominal wall plication through a periumbilical incision. Thirty-two patients were evaluated on overall patient satisfaction and complication rates, including seroma (five, 15.6 percent), major sensory loss (none), skin slough (none), skin burns (none), end hits (i.e., a small, partial-thickness, subdermal burn; one, 3 percent), and limited results (two, 6 percent). The patients expressed that avoidance of the abdominal scar and diminished recuperative time outweighed the benefit of tighter skin associated with conventional abdominoplasty. This technique may provide another avenue for appropriate contouring of the abdomen in properly selected patients.     

Large-volume liposuction: a review of 631 consecutive cases over 12 years.

Since the advent of epinephrine-containing wetting solutions and sophisticated fluid management techniques, increasingly larger and larger volumes of liposuction aspirations have been reported. Unfortunately, with these larger volumes of liposuction being routinely performed, greater rates of complications have also been reported, with the worst of these resulting in deaths. In a response to the increasing concerns over the safety of large-volume liposuction, a critical review of the senior author's own series has been performed to evaluate risks and benefits and to recommend guidelines for safe and effective large-volume liposuction. A retrospective chart review was performed on 631 consecutive patients who underwent liposuction procedures of at least 3000 cc total aspirate. All procedures were performed by the same senior surgeon between January of 1986 and March of 1998. Before September of 1996, traditional liposuction techniques were used. After September of 1996, ultrasound-assisted liposuction was performed. The superwet technique of fluid management was employed for all procedures performed after 1991. The particulars of the surgical and anesthetic techniques used are reviewed in the article. Data collection included preoperative patient demographics, preoperative and postoperative weights and measurements, and preoperative and postoperative photographs. Total aspirate volumes, fluid intakes, and fluid outputs were measured, and all complications were tallied. Average follow-up was 1 year.Results showed the majority of patients to be women, aged 17 to 74 years old. Of the preoperative weights, 98.7 percent were within 50 pounds of ideal chart weight. Total aspirate volumes ranged from 3 to 17 liters, with 94.5 percent of these under 10 liters. Fluid balance measurements showed an average of 120 cc/kg positive fluid balance at the end of the procedure, with none of these patients experiencing any significant fluid balance abnormalities. Cosmetic results were good, with a 2- to 6-inch drop from preoperative measurements, depending on the area treated. Ten percent of patients experienced minor skin contour irregularities, with most of these patients not requiring any additional surgical procedures. One year after surgery, 80 percent of patients maintained stable postoperative weights. No serious complications were experienced in this series. The majority of the complications consisted of minor skin injuries and burns, allergic reactions to garments, and postoperative seromas. The more serious complications included four patients who developed mild pulmonary edema and one patient who developed pneumonia postoperatively. These patients were treated appropriately and went on to have uneventful recoveries. The results show that large-volume liposuction can be a safe and effective procedure when patients are carefully selected and when anesthetic and surgical techniques are properly performed. Meticulous fluid balance calculations are necessary to avoid volume abnormalities, and experience is mandatory when performing the largest aspirations. Cosmetic benefits are excellent, and overall complication rates are low.     

Gynecomastia - a difficult diagnostic problem

Gynecomastia is a benign, abnormal, growth of the male breast gland which can occur unilaterally or bilaterally, resulting from a proliferation of glandular, fibrous and adipose tissue. Gynecomastia is characterised by the presence of soft, 2-4 cm in diameter, usually discusshaped enlargement of tissues under the nipple. It is estimated that this pathology occurs in 32-65% of men over the age of 17. Gynecomastia is a psychosocial problem and may lead to a perceived lowering of quality of life. The main cause of gynecomastia is a loss of equilibrium between oestrogens and androgens. Increased sensitivity for oestrogens of the breast gland, or local factors (e.g. an excessive synthesis of oestrogens in breast tissues or changes in oestrogen and androgen receptors) may cause gynecomastia. Also, prolactin, thyroxine, cortisol, human chorionic gonadotropin, leptin and receptors for human chorionic gonadotropin, prolactin and luteinizing hormone localised in tissues of the male breast may participate in the etiopathogenesis of gynecomastia. Usually three types of gynecomastia are distinguished: physiological, idiopathic and pathological gynecomastia. The latter is the consequence of relative or absolute excess of oestrogens. In this paper, frequent as well as casuistic causes of gynecomastia will be described. A diagnosis of gynecomastia is usually possible after a palpation examination. Ultrasonographic, mammographic or histopathological examinations are useful in aiding diagnosis. The five degree scale devised by Tanner and Marshall is useful in estimating disease progression.     

Current preferences for breast reduction techniques: a survey of board-certified plastic surgeons 2002

The purpose of this survey was to assess the current trends in breast reduction techniques and to compare satisfaction rates and complications associated with traditional incision and limited incision techniques. In September of 2002, a breast reduction survey was sent to 1500 members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery; 554 of the members returned the survey. Questions elicited categorical answers, and the data were evaluated using the chi-square test and the comparison of two proportions. The results showed that 56 percent of the respondents use only the inferior pedicle and Wise pattern techniques, whereas 6.9 percent of the respondents use only the limited incision techniques. Physician satisfaction was rated as 4 on a scale of 1 (unsatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied) for both the limited incision and traditional incision groups. Patient satisfaction was rated as 4 for the limited incision group and as 5 for the traditional incision group. This difference in patient satisfaction per surgeon was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The traditional group reported a lower complication rate than did the limited incision group (p < 0.05). The most frequent complications for the traditional incision group were compared with those of the limited incision group. Practice profiles, liposuction, and opinions regarding future changes in breast surgery were also analyzed. The majority of surgeons reported that they did not anticipate changing their practices to accommodate advances in limited incision techniques; however, 89 percent reported that the new limited incision techniques and liposuction are trends that are here to stay.     

Gynecomastia and the complete circumareolar approach in the surgical management of skin redundancy

Gynecomastia is a benign enlargement of the male breast due to a physiological or pathological factor that interferes with the balance between estrogens and androgens in the serum. Gynecomastia itself requires no treatment unless the persistent enlargement of the male breast is a source of embarrassment and/or distress for the adolescent or adult man. The indications for the surgical treatment of gynecomastia are founded on two main objectives: (1) the restoration of male chest shape and (2) diagnostic evaluation of suspected breast lesions. The diagnostic evaluation begins with an adequate history and a thorough breast examination helped by laboratory tests and instrumental research. Several approaches for surgical treatment have been described in the literature. Some problems arise in patients who have significant enlargement and ptosis of the breast that will require skin reduction and in some patients requiring nipple-areola complex reduction. The authors believe that the complete circumareolar technique with purse-string suture creates the best aesthetic results, with fewer complications, in patients with moderate and severe ptotic glandular breast enlargements that have skin redundancy combined with areolar enlargement. From 1995 through 1999, a total of 10 male patients with moderate to severe gynecomastia were treated surgically using a complete circumareolar approach. All patients achieved a good aesthetic contour of the chest. Only two patients required a revision of the circumareolar scar to correct postoperative enlargement.     

Outcome study in liposuction breast reduction

Liposuction as a primary modality of treating breast hypertrophy has been reported in the literature; however, many of these reports are small series and personal experiences. This report is the first outcome study to attempt to validate the effectiveness of liposuction as a primary method of breast reduction surgery. Questionnaires were sent to 117 patients who had undergone liposuction breast reduction surgery in our office during a 4-year period. Seventy-eight questionnaires were returned (67 percent response rate). The patients were asked about their complaints, their surgical results, and their satisfaction with the operation. Complaints such as neck and back pain, shoulder ruts, and intertrigo were improved or eliminated in the vast majority of patients. Women returned to work in 5 days on average and resumed full exercise in 2 weeks. Eighty percent of patients were either very or completely satisfied with their outcomes, 87 percent would choose the liposuction method again, and 92 percent would recommend the liposuction method to a friend. This study demonstrates that liposuction breast reduction is an effective method of breast reduction surgery.     

Is the treatment of axillary osmidrosis with liposuction better than open surgery?

Axillary osmidrosis is an annoying, although not life-threatening, problem that includes unpleasant odor and the occasional staining of clothing. Suction-assisted lipectomy has been tested as a treatment for axillary osmidrosis with variable success. The authors retrospectively reviewed 134 patients who underwent superficial liposuction for bilateral axillary osmidrosis in their division between June of 1998 and June of 2002. The surgical complications and results were compared with those reported in their previous report of 343 patients (102 available for postoperative result evaluation) who received open surgical treatment with partial excision of axillary skin and subcutaneous tissue. The overall complication rate was 3.73 percent, significantly lower than the 11.08 percent complication rate seen with open surgical treatment. Of their 134 patients, 114 were available for long-term follow-up. Thirteen patients (11.40 percent) had very good results, 79 patients (69.30 percent) had good results, and 22 patients (19.30 percent) had poor results. Significant differences were found between those who underwent superficial liposuction and those who underwent open surgery. The number of patients with very good and good results decreased significantly from 91.18 percent (open surgery) to 80.70 percent (liposuction), and those with little or no improvement increased from 8.82 percent (open surgery) to 19.29 percent (liposuction). Compared with open surgery for the treatment of osmidrosis, liposuction produces significantly fewer complications but is less effective. Of the patients who underwent liposuction for osmidrosis, 80 percent were satisfied with the result. Further study is needed to determine whether liposuction for osmidrosis can be improved.     

Cervicofacial rejuvenation using ultrasound-assisted lipectomy

This article discusses a technique of cervicofacial rejuvenation that involves ultrasound-assisted lipectomy. This method is indicated for those patients who might be early candidates for a rhytidectomy, and/or those with an adipose volume excess in the lower facial and cervical areas. The application of ultrasonic energy stimulates skin retraction and allows for the superficial fat to be more safely accessed than can be accomplished with conventional liposuction methods. This technique, along with a retrospective analysis of the first 26 cases treated with the technique, will be presented in this article.     

Hearing and ultrasound-assisted liposuction: the effect on surgeon and patient

Ultrasound-assisted liposuction has become an important tool in body-contouring surgery. Although ultrasound frequency is by definition outside the range of normal human hearing, an audible sound is heard during ultrasound-assisted liposuction. This study measured sound intensity during ultrasound-assisted liposuction performed with two commercially available systems. Sound intensity was measured at the surgeon's ear, surgical site, and patient's glabella. All measurements obtained with both machines fell within acceptable standards as defined by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Use of ultrasound-assisted liposuction does not pose a risk to the patient, the surgeon, or operating room personnel.     

Blood loss in major liposuction procedures: a comparison study using suction-assisted versus ultrasonically assisted lipoplasty.

The blood loss that accompanies liposuction procedures has always been a concern. Tumescent injection of the targeted area of liposuction with dilute lidocaine and epinephrine solution has minimized intraoperative blood loss. Proponents of a newer ultrasonically assisted lipoplasty technique have claimed many benefits over traditional suction-assisted lipoplasty. However, few quantitative data are available on the intraoperative blood loss and the significance of postoperative anemia using the ultrasonic method. A prospective clinical observational design was used to investigate 38 patients undergoing suction-assisted lipoplasty and 37 patients undergoing ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty in whom the liposuction aspirate was expected to be more than 1000 ml. These patients were investigated with preoperative measurement of hemoglobin, platelet count, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, and postoperative measurement of hemoglobin on the seventh postoperative day. In addition, hemoglobin concentration and whole blood volume were calculated from the infranatant portion of the liposuction aspirate. The mean +/- SD volume of the liposuction aspirate was 2901 +/- 1471 ml for suction-assisted compared with 2741 +/- 1086 ml for ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. The mean +/- SD of whole blood volume in liposuction aspirate per case was 36 +/- 50.82 ml for suction-assisted lipoplasty and 36 +/- 28.62 ml for ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. The mean +/- SD of the preoperative hemoglobin concentration was 13.93 +/- 0.99 g/dl for suction-assisted lipoplasty and 14.05 +/- 1.16 g/dl for ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty, whereas the mean +/- SD of the postoperative hemoglobin concentration was 13 +/- 1.42 g/dl for suction-assisted lipoplasty and 13.05 +/- 1.32 g/dl for ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. The mean decrease in hemoglobin on the seventh postoperative day was 0.93 +/- 0.92 g/dl for suction-assisted lipoplasty and 1 +/- 0.64 g/dl for ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. The volume of whole blood loss was estimated to be 12.4 ml in each 1000 ml of liposuction aspirate when using suction-assisted lipoplasty versus 13.1 ml when using ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. All procedures were done under general anesthesia, and patients were discharged home on the same day. No blood transfusion was required. This study shows that blood loss using the ultrasonic technique is slightly higher, though insignificant, than when using suction. However, this study did not demonstrate a difference in the postoperative hemoglobin decrease between the two techniques.     

Gynecomastia: suction lipectomy as a contemporary solution

Suction lipectomy is adapted for the correction of gynecomastia. Previous attempts using suction lipectomy for gynecomastia still required the use of sharp dissection for removal of the glandular breast tissue as well as excision of redundant skin. With this new technique, gynecomastia is corrected solely with the use of suction lipectomy. The technique is successful if the gynecomastia is due to excess fat or parenchymal hypertrophy. A 7-mm cannula is inserted first, to remove the adipose tissue. Then a 2.4-mm cannula is used to remove the glandular and ductal tissue. The 7-mm cannula is then reinserted to remove subareolar parenchyma and to make final contour adjustments. The surrounding subcutaneous tissue is easily undermined to avoid a saucer deformity and to allow for skin contraction. Patients return to full activities in 48 hours. A compressive garment is worn for 4 to 6 weeks. The results of 10 patients are discussed.     

Abdominal dermolipectomy in an abdomen with pre-existing scars: a different concept

Although abdominal dermolipectomy is a frequently performed procedure, few publications have reported on the safety of the procedure in the scarred abdomen. The aim of this study was to stress the possibility of performing a natural-looking abdominoplasty with no complication such as skin necrosis or liponecrosis in the presence of abdominal scars and to clarify that the scarred abdomen is not a great limitation for full abdominoplasty as reported in the literature. Seventy-six abdominoplasties were performed on scarred patients from July of 1997 to June of 2003. Twenty-five patients had oblique subcostal scars, six patients had median supraumbilical scars, three patients had median infraumbilical scars, 10 patients had appendectomy scars, nine patients had paramedian supraumbilical scars, eight patients had paramedian infraumbilical scars, seven patients had long transverse scars of repaired ventral hernias, and eight patients had multiple small scars after laparoscopy. In addition, there were concomitant transverse cesarean delivery scars in 40 patients. All patients underwent full abdominoplasties, plication of the musculoaponeurotic system, and liposuction assistance if required (45 patients). Of 76 subjects, three patients had very limited liponecrosis at the watershed area. Eleven patients (14.5 percent) were morbidly obese and heavy smokers. In comparisons of postabdominoplasty complications, such as liponecrosis, wound infection, and dehiscence with and without liposuction in scarred abdomen, no significant differences were found. Secondary revision was more common among abdominoplasties without liposuction [seven of 45 (15.6 percent) versus 12 of 31 (38.7 percent); p = 0.02]. In conclusion, there is no limitation or contraindication for abdominal dermolipectomy with or without liposuction assistance on the previously scarred abdomen as long as the vascular zones of the abdomen are respected. The abdominal wall dissection is limited to allow only the plication of the musculoaponeurotic system, and aggressive liposuction is avoided.     

Breast reduction with ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty

Ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty for reduction of fatty breasts and fixation has been found to be a safe technique with promising aesthetic results when it is applied in selected patients and performed by a surgeon with expertise with ultrasound-assisted body contouring. From 1995 to 2000, 120 patients were treated with ultrasound energy to decrease the fatty component of the breast tissue and at the same time to lift the breast mound. Each patient was evaluated preoperatively with mammograms for correct assessment of the nature and consistency of the breast tissue. Only patients with fibrofatty and fatty breast parenchyma were selected for breast reduction and fixation with ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. Patients with suspect mammograms (calcification) and a strong family history of breast cancer were not considered. All the prescreening and the postoperative long-term mammographic evaluations were conducted by a radiologist with high competence in breast tissue resonance. Patients' age ranged from 17 to 53 years. Total aspirate ranged from 300 to 1200 ml for size, of which 65 percent was supranatant (fat) and 35 percent was infranatant (tumescence solution and blood). Patients were operated on while they were under general anesthesia; more recently, pure tumescent anesthesia was tried with success in minor cases. Breast dimensions were assessed with breast sizers (before and after the operation), and breast measurements were assessed using a classic breast drawing. Minimum follow-up of patients was 4 years. Particular care was given to evaluating long-term breast tissue appearance through mammographic studies and to looking for suspected calcifications. No evidence of a suspect mass or calcifications was found during the 4-year follow-up. The main advantages of the technique are a significant reduction in breast volume (up to three cup sizes), significant breast lift (up to 5 cm), and nearly invisible scars (1.5 cm in length at the inframammary sulcus and at the axilla).     

External ultrasonic lipoplasty: an effective method of fat removal and skin shrinkage

External ultrasonic lipoplasty is an effective method for the removal of localized fat and the fat due to moderate obesity. The ultrasound is externally applied and transmitted through the skin surface. The acoustic waves are selectively absorbed by previously injected tumescent fluid and fat. It is the combination of this acoustic wave and ultrasound-induced fluid streaming that facilitates fat removal. Multiple, 2.5- to 3.7-mm incisions are made, through which standard thin (2.3 to 3.5 mm) suction lipectomy cannulae are used to aspirate the emulsified fat and oil. A major advantage of this procedure is that superficial subdermal liposuction can be used safely, which enhances the thoroughness of fat removal and the contraction of the overlying skin. A total of 160 consecutive patients successfully underwent this procedure. Recovery was rapid, and patients returned to full activities within 24 to 48 hours. The skin remained soft, with minimal to no bruising throughout the entire postoperative period. The problems seen with internal ultrasonic liposuction, such as end hits and skin burns, were avoided. The large incisions required for internal ultrasound liposuction were not necessary. Previous models of externally applied ultrasound support current observations of the safety of external ultrasound lipoplasty. Only one small seroma was seen. External ultrasound lipoplasty is a safe, effective, and low-cost method of ultrasound-assisted removal of localized fat and the fat due to moderate obesity. Physician and patient satisfaction is high.     

Is there evidence for excessive free radical production in vivo during ultrasound-assisted liposuction?

The surgical technique of ultrasound-assisted liposuction has become a standard procedure for the treatment of lipodystrophy. However, little is known about the impact of this therapy on fatty tissue on the molecular level. There are concerns about possible adverse effects related to the high-intensity ultrasound energy, because in vitro studies have shown a substantial generation of free radicals. In this study, the authors investigated whether ultrasound waves can create an excessive free radical production in vivo by measuring lipid peroxidation products in the form of malondialdehyde equivalents. For this purpose, the thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) assay was chosen. In this test, malondialdehyde, a major product of lipid peroxidation, reacts with thiobarbituric acid to produce a pink adduct that can be measured spectrophotometrically. The authors determined oxidation products in 28 aspirates of 17 treated patients before ultrasound-assisted liposuction (0 minutes) to establish a baseline concentration and at 2, 5, and 10 minutes after the treatment was begun. Median malondialdehyde concentration of the control group (conventional liposuction, 0 minutes) was 3.40 nmol of malondialdehyde per gram of adipose tissue. Median concentrations after 2, 5, and 10 minutes of ultrasound-assisted liposuction were 7.45 (n = 28), 8.84 (n = 21), and 4.07 (n = 8) nmol malondialdehyde per gram adipose tissue, respectively. The differences were not statistically significant. The data suggest that there is no excessive formation of lipid oxidation products in response to free radicals. The antioxidative capacity of adipose tissue does not seem to be overwhelmed by the standard application regimen of ultrasound-assisted liposuction.