Patient safety in plastic surgery

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Recognize risk factors for venous thromboembolism and identify patients who would benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation; 2. Describe the effects of hypothermia in the perioperative period. 3. Understand the importance of blood pressure control in the plastic surgery patient. SUMMARY: This article provides a summary of important factors that contribute to improved patient safety in plastic surgery. The identification of patients and procedures that have an increased risk of complications enables the physician to carry out prophylactic measures to reduce the rate of these complications. Venous thromboembolism, hypothermia, bleeding diathesis, and perioperative hypertension are identifiable risks of plastic surgery, which can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. An evidence-based system and individual practice measures can help to decrease these risks. Thorough preoperative patient evaluation, detailed informed consent, and perioperative care delivered in a safe environment can contribute to improved safety in plastic surgery.     

Assessing and Addressing the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Across the Spectrum of Gender Affirming Care: A Review

ObjectiveAccumulating evidence demonstrates that gender affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) improves mental health outcomes in transgender persons. Data specific to the risks associated with GAHT for transgender persons continue to emerge, allowing for improvements in understanding, predicting, and mitigating adverse outcomes while informing discussion about desired effects. Of particular concern is the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in the context of both longitudinal GAHT and the perioperative setting. Combining what is known about the risk of VTE in cisgender individuals on hormone therapy (HT) with the evidence for transgender persons receiving HT allows for an informed approach to assess underlying risk and improve care in the transgender community.ObservationsHormone formulation, dosing, route, and duration of therapy can impact thromboembolic risk, with transdermal estrogen formulations having the lowest risk. There are no existing risk scores for VTE that consider HT as a possible risk factor. Risk assessment for recurrent VTE and bleeding tendencies using current scores may be helpful when assessing individual risk. Gender affirming surgeries present unique perioperative concerns, and certain procedures include a high likelihood that patients will be on exogenous estrogens at the time of surgery, potentially increasing thromboembolic risk.Conclusions and RelevanceWithholding GAHT due to potential adverse events may cause negative impacts for individual patients. Providers should be knowledgeable about the management of HT in transgender individuals of all ages, as well as in the perioperative setting, to avoid periods in which transgender individuals are off GAHT. Treatment decisions for both anticoagulation and HT should be individualized and tailored to patients’ overall goals and desired outcomes, given that the physical and mental health benefits of gender affirming care may outweigh the risk of VTE.     

A guide to interpreting a study of patient-reported outcomes

Outcomes measured from the patient perspective are particularly important in plastic surgery, where many of the treatments are aimed at improving physical function, psychosocial function, and quality of life. Understanding the measurement of patient-reported outcomes is critical to determine the value of the interventions performed, to better inform clinical decision-making, and to guide policy debates. It is critical that physicians understand their patients' individual values when making treatment and policy recommendations based on evidence. This guide outlines the questions that readers should ask when appraising literature using patient-reported outcomes.     

Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism in postmenopausal women: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To assess the risk of venous thromboembolism in women using hormone replacement therapy by study design, characteristics of the therapy and venous thromboembolism, and clinical background.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources Medline.Studies reviewed Eight observational studies and nine randomised controlled trials.Inclusion criteria Studies on hormone replacement therapy that reported venous thromboembolism.Review measures Homogeneity between studies was analysed using χ² and I² statistics. Overall risk of venous thromboembolism was assessed from a fixed effects or random effects model.Results Meta-analysis of observational studies showed that oral oestrogen but not transdermal oestrogen increased the risk of venous thromboembolism. Compared with non-users of oestrogen, the odds ratio of first time venous thromboembolism in current users of oral oestrogen was 2.5 (95% confidence interval 1.9 to 3.4) and in current users of transdermal oestrogen was 1.2 (0.9 to 1.7). Past users of oral oestrogen had a similar risk of venous thromboembolism to never users. The risk of venous thromboembolism in women using oral oestrogen was higher in the first year of treatment (4.0, 2.9 to 5.7) compared with treatment for more than one year (2.1, 1.3 to 3.8; P<0.05). No noticeable difference in the risk of venous thromboembolism was observed between unopposed oral oestrogen (2.2, 1.6 to 3.0) and opposed oral oestrogen (2.6, 2.0 to 3.2). Results from nine randomised controlled trials confirmed the increased risk of venous thromboembolism among women using oral oestrogen (2.1, 1.4 to 3.1). The combination of oral oestrogen and thrombogenic mutations or obesity further enhanced the risk of venous thromboembolism, whereas transdermal oestrogen did not seem to confer additional risk in women at high risk of venous thromboembolism.Conclusion Oral oestrogen increases the risk of venous thromboembolism, especially during the first year of treatment. Transdermal oestrogen may be safer with respect to thrombotic risk. More data are required to investigate differences in risk across the wide variety of hormone regimens, especially the different types of progestogens.     

A simple venous thromboembolism prophylaxis protocol for patients undergoing bariatric surgery

Objective: Pulmonary embolism is a leading cause of death for bariatric patients. Numerous regimens have been proposed, but a comprehensive, simple approach is lacking. This study provides a simple, easily implemented prophylaxis regimen. Research Methods and Procedures: One hundred fifty bariatric surgery patients were evaluated. Patients considered at high risk for venous thromboembolism had heart failure, a BMI of ≥50 kg/m², or a history of venous thromboembolism or pelvic surgery. Preoperatively and postoperatively, all patients received subcutaneous enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. High‐risk patients received either preoperatively inserted inferior vena cava filters or continuous heparin infusions intraoperatively. All high‐risk patients were anticoagulated with warfarin (Coumadin; Bristol Myers‐Squibb, Princeton, NJ) for at least 3 months postoperatively. Initially, some patients experienced significant hemorrhage; to prevent this, sutures were oversewn into staple lines. Results: No patient experienced venous thromboembolism; a binomial test showed that the regimen reduced the risk of this complication to less than 2% (p < 0.05). Hemorrhage sufficient to require transfusion occurred in 4 of the first 20 patients; of the remaining 130 patients, into whose staple lines sutures were oversewn, none required transfusion (p < 0.05). Discussion: Patients should be divided into those who are at high risk and those who are at low risk for venous thromboembolism. All patients should receive pre‐ and postoperative anticoagulation. High‐risk patients should also receive either an inferior vena cava filter or intraoperative heparin infusions, as well as at least 3 months of Coumadin therapy. Oversewing of staple lines may reduce the risk of hemorrhage.     

Co-activation of platelets by prolactin or leptin--pathophysiological findings and clinical implications.

Platelet activation is involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and venous thromboembolism, and might therefore be a possible link between the two entities. Prolactin and leptin have recently been recognized as potent co-activators of ADP-dependent platelet aggregation or P-selectin expression, and are therefore suspected as additional risk factors for both arterial and venous thrombosis. There are clinical situations that have a known association with higher prolactin or leptin levels (pregnancy, obesity or anti-psychotic therapy) and increased risk of thromboembolic events. We compared the impact of both hormones on platelet activation in vitro and in vivo, indicating that prolactin has a stronger effect on platelet activation as leptin in vitro and in vivo. We have also demonstrated that prolactin levels are increased in so called idiopathic thrombosis, and that conversely, patients with prolactinoma have an increased frequency of thrombosis during the hyperprolactinemic state, in a retrospective analysis. Moreover, we have demonstrated increased prolactin values in stroke and myocardial infarction. Prospective studies have yet to be performed to give this theory its final confirmation. The involvement of hormonal factors in platelet aggregation and venous or arterial thrombosis may have important clinical implications such as for risk stratification of patients with venous and arterial thrombosis or new therapeutic options such as decreasing pro-coagulant hormone levels in certain risk situations.     

Hormone replacement therapy and risk of venous thromboembolism: population based case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between use of hormone replacement therapy and the risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. DESIGN: Population based case-control study. SETTING: Population enrolled in the General Practice Research Database, United Kingdom. SUBJECTS: A cohort of 347,253 women aged 50 to 79 without major risk factors for venous thromboembolism was identified. Cases were 292 women admitted to hospital for a first episode of pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis; 10,000 controls were randomly selected from the source cohort. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted relative risks estimated from unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: The adjusted odds ratio of venous thromboembolism for current use of hormone replacement therapy compared with non-users was 2.1 (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 3.2). This increased risk was restricted to first year users, with odds ratios of 4.6 (2.5 to 8.4) during the first six months and 3.0 (1.4 to 6.5) 6-12 months after starting treatment. No major risk differences were observed between users of low and high doses of oestrogens, unopposed and opposed treatment, and oral and transdermal preparations. The risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism among non-users of replacement therapy was estimated to be 1.3 per 10,000 women per year. Among current users, idiopathic venous thromboembolism occurs at two to three times the rate in non-users, resulting in one to two additional cases per 10,000 women per year. CONCLUSIONS: Current use of hormone replacement therapy was associated with a higher risk of venous thromboembolism, although the risk seemed to be restricted to the first year of use.     

Impact of genetic counseling and testing on colorectal cancer screening behavior

One goal of cancer genetic counseling is to improve early detection and prevention of cancers by identifying individuals at risk and providing screening recommendations. This study determined the impact of genetic counseling and testing on patient's post-genetic risk assessment colorectal cancer screening behaviors. Follow-up data from patients seen August, 1996, through May, 1998, at the Johns Hopkins Cancer Risk Assessment Clinic were analyzed. Eligible patients included those without cancer who were due for a colon examination by the time of follow-up, based on recommendations given during genetic risk assessment (GRA). We analyzed the role of gender, age, time since GRA, prior screening, genetic testing decision, mutation status, and post-GRA screening. Of 65 patients evaluated, 50 (76.9%) had undergone at least one endoscopic colon exam prior to visiting the Cancer Risk Assessment Clinic. At the time of GRA, 37 of 65 (56.9%) were overdue for a colon exam and at the time of follow-up, 15/65 (23.1%) were past due (p < 0.001). Patients with mutation-positive genetic tests were more likely to adhere to screening guidelines than those with negative gene tests (100% vs. 40.5%, p = 0.05). Genetic counseling and testing increases overall patient adherence with recommended colon screening, especially for those with positive genetic test results. However, patients with negative results may receive false reassurance about cancer risks and fail to follow recommended screening. Emphasis should be placed on the importance of screening even when genetic test results are negative.     

Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy and venous thromboembolism

Background:Women taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT) have a 2- to 5-fold increased risk of venous thrombosis compared with nonusers. Increasingly, evidence has suggested that the size of the risk increase varies according to related factors, such as the type of estrogen used, the mode of delivery, and the presence of other predisposing factors.Objective:The aim of this study was to examine the current literature to assess the varying risk of venous thrombosis among women taking HRT.Methods:An extensive search was carried out on all major electronic databases including MEDLINE 1995 to October 2005 and BIS (EMBASE) 1980 to October 2005. Relevant keywords relating to thrombosis (venous thromboembolism, venous thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism) combined with hormones (hormone replacement therapy and estrogen) were used to capture all potentially relevant studies.Results:The increased risk of a first episode of venous thrombosis in women currently taking HRT compared with nonusers ranged from 1.22 (95% CI, 0.76–1.94) to 4.50 (95% CI, 1.30–15.10). Similar increases in risks for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism were found. The risk of venous thrombosis is the highest in the first year of therapy, durich which as much as a greater than 6-fold increase was found. Women taking estrogen-progestin HRT had a significantly greater risk of venous thrombosis than those using estrogen-only preparations (odds ratio [OR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.13–2.26). Studies have also suggested a dose-related effect, suggesting high-dose estrogen therapy is associated with a greater increased risk of venous thrombosis than low-dose preparations. Comparisons between oral and transdermal HRT have shown a significant difference in the relative risk of venous thrombosis (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.9–8.3) favoring the use of transdermal preparations. The presence of thrombophilia, particularly factor V Leiden, further amplifies the risk of venous thrombosis in women using HRT (OR, 13.16; 95% CI, 4.28–40.47). The presence of other risk factors, such as increasing age and being overweight, were all shown to be associated with a further increase in the risk of venous thrombosis.ConclusionsRecent studies have confirmed that current users of HRT are at increased risk of venous thrombosis. The increase in risk has been shown to vary according to duration of use, with the risk being greatest during the first year of use. Moreover, the increased risk varies according to the type of preparation and presence of additional risk factors such as increasing age, obesity, cancer, and recent surgery. Few studies have examined the relationship between thrombophilia, HRT and venous thrombosis; thus, more research is required in this area before accurate estimates of the risk can be made.     

基于人类信号网络和表达谱数据研究静脉血栓复发机制

目的:静脉血栓是一种高复发风险和高致死率的疾病,其形成和复发的分子机制尚不明确。基于人类信号网络和基因表达谱数据可针对静脉血栓经华法令抗凝治疗后的复发机制进行研究。方法:结合表达谱数据和人类信号网络,设计差异模块筛选策略,通过功能分析、差异表达分析和已知血栓相关基因及药物靶基因的互作关联研究,获得与静脉血栓复发相关的显著差异模块。结果:最终获得8个与静脉血栓复发密切相关的显著差异模块,评估了华法令治疗静脉血栓的效能,提出了联合用药的3种可能途径。结论:应用本文提出的整合筛选策略,能识别与静脉血栓复发相关的模块,探究静脉血栓复发的分子机制和评估华法令的治疗效能。还提供了潜在的联合用药途径,这对治愈血栓、防治血栓复发及复发机制的研究具有重要意义。     

Improving Clinical Risk Stratification at Diagnosis in Primary Prostate Cancer: A Prognostic Modelling Study

IntroductionOver 80% of the nearly 1 million men diagnosed with prostate cancer annually worldwide present with localised or locally advanced non-metastatic disease. Risk stratification is the cornerstone for clinical decision making and treatment selection for these men. The most widely applied stratification systems use presenting prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration, biopsy Gleason grade, and clinical stage to classify patients as low, intermediate, or high risk. There is, however, significant heterogeneity in outcomes within these standard groupings. The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) has recently adopted a prognosis-based pathological classification that has yet to be included within a risk stratification system. Here we developed and tested a new stratification system based on the number of individual risk factors and incorporating the new ISUP prognostic score.ConclusionsA novel and simple five-stratum risk stratification system outperforms the standard three-stratum risk stratification system in predicting the risk of PCSM at diagnosis in men with primary non-metastatic prostate cancer, even when accounting for competing risks. This model also allows delineation of new clinically relevant subgroups of men who might potentially receive more appropriate therapy for their disease. Future research will seek to validate our results in external datasets and will explore the value of including additional variables in the system in order in improve prognostic performance.     

Framework for Human Health Risk Assessment

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has recognized the need to develop a framework for human health risk assessment that puts a perspective on the approaches in practice throughout the Agency. In response, the Agency's Risk Assessment Forum has begun the long-term process of developing a framework for human health risk assessment. The framework will be a communication piece that will lay out the scientific basis, principles, and policy choices underlying past and current risk assessment approaches and will provide recommendations for integrating/harmonizing risk assessment methodologies for all human health endpoints.     

Effect of 1995 pill scare on rates of venous thromboembolism among women taking combined oral contraceptives: analysis of general practice research database

In October 1995 the UK Committee on Safety of Medicines advised that combined oral contraceptives (OCs) containing either gestodene or desogestrel were associated with twice the risk of venous thromboembolism compared with older products. This study was conducted to compare the incidence of venous thromboembolism among women taking combined OCs before and after the October 1995 pill scare. Using data from the General Practice Research Database, a total of 304 practices were analyzed. Overall, results show that use of third-generation combined OCs fell from 53% during the period of January 1993 to October 1995 to 14% during the period of November 1995 to December 1998. No significant change was noted in the incidence of venous thromboembolism between the two periods after age was adjusted for (incidence ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.39). Based on these findings, it is concluded that third-generation OCs are not associated with a twofold increase in risk of venous thromboembolism compared with older progestogens.     

Risk of venous thromboembolism among users of third generation oral contraceptives compared with users of oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel before and after 1995: cohort and case-control analysis

ObjectiveTo compare the risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism among women taking third generation oral contraceptives (with gestodene or desogestrel) with that among women taking oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel.DesignCohort and case-control analyses derived from the General Practice Research Database.SettingUK general practices, January 1993 to December 1999.ParticipantsWomen aged 15-39 taking third generation oral contraceptives or oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel.ResultsThe adjusted estimates of relative risk for venous thromboembolism associated with third generation oral contraceptives compared with oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel was 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.8) in the cohort analysis and 2.3 (1.3 to 3.9) in the case-control study. The estimates for the two types of oral contraceptives were similar before and after the warning issued by the Committee on Safety of Medicines in October 1995. A shift away from the use of third generation oral contraceptives after the scare was more pronounced among younger women (who have a lower risk of venous thromboembolism) than among older women. Fewer cases of venous thromboembolism occurred in 1996 and later than would have been expected if the use of oral contraceptives had remained unchanged.ConclusionsThese findings are consistent with previously reported studies, which found that compared with oral contraceptives with levonorgestrel, third generation oral contraceptives are associated with around twice the risk of venous thromboembolism.     

FV-Leiden- und Prothrombin-G20210A-Mutation

Factor V Leiden mutation and the prothrombin G20210A variant are the most common thrombophilic risk factors identified so far, with incidences of 2–4% and 1%, respectively. While the former is associated with the APC resistence phenotype, the prothrombotic phenotype of the prothrombin G20210A variant remains unclear. The presence of each of the mutations increases the risk of venous thromboembolism. However, the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism is not significantly enhanced. Testing for both prothrombotic mutations can confirm the clinical diagnosis of thrombophilia but has no effect on the anticoagulant management of these patients.     

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Generic Ecological Assessment Endpoints

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency determined that one of the major impediments to the advancement and application of ecological risk assessment is doubt concerning appropriate assessment endpoints. The Agency's Risk Assessment Forum determined that the best solution to this problem was to define a set of generic ecological assessment endpoints (GEAEs). They are assessment endpoints that are applicable to a wide range of ecological risk assessments; because they reflect the programmatic goals of the Agency, they are applicable to a wide array of environmental issues, and they may be estimated using existing assessment tools. They are not specifically defined for individual cases; some ad hoc elaboration by users is expected. The GEAEs are not exhaustive or mandatory. Although most of the Agency's ecological decisions have been based on organism-level effects, GEAEs are also defined for populations, ecosystems, and special places.     

The identification of potential radiation risk groups in case of chronical occupational exposure: individual cancer risks among the industrial firm "Maiak" personnel

The draft new recommendations of the ICRP emphasize the need for transition from the collective dose to the dose matrix concept with optimization of the radiation protection system. In fact, this means assessment of the attributive (radiation-induced) risk at individual level with allowance for the dynamics of dose accumulation during the whole length of professional experience. The work provides assessments for high potential risk group from the "Mayak" personnel based on the dose matrix and using the UNSCEAR technique for assessing the attributive risk. It was found that about 2% of "Mayak" personnel subject to individual dosimetric monitoring in 2005 can be attributed to this group.     

Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance and Procedural Documents: An Annotated Compilation and Evaluation of Reference Materials

The scientific approach toward ecological risk assessment (ERA) has advanced greatly during the 1990s. This growth has been accompanied by the development of ERA guidance by USEPA Headquarters, individual USEPA Regions, state environmental agencies, as well as international agencies. This compilation of ERA guidance and procedural documents identifies many of the existing ERA reference materials from the regulatory and/or governmental agency arena. In addition, this compilation provides annotations pertaining to the focus of each reviewed document, and compares/contrasts the approaches presented in the documents. As such, the evaluation provides insight into some of the qualities and levels of detail provided by each document. Examples of documents which are highlighted include recently published USEPA's “Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment;” USEPA's “Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund;” the U.S. Army's “Procedural Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessments;” and Environment Canada's “Ecological Risk Assessments Under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.”     

Estimate of Venous Thromboembolism and Related-Deaths Attributable to the Use of Combined Oral Contraceptives in France

Purpose

To estimate the number of venous thromboembolic events and related-premature mortality (including immediate in-hospital lethality) attributable to the use of combined oral contraceptives in women aged 15 to 49 years-old between 2000 and 2011 in France.

Methods

French data on sales of combined oral contraceptives and on contraception behaviours from two national surveys conducted in 2000 and 2010 were combined to estimate the number of exposed women according to contraceptives generation and age. Absolute risk of first time venous thromboembolism in non-users of hormonal contraception and increased risk of thromboembolism in users vs. non-users of hormonal contraception were estimated on the basis of literature data. Finally, immediate in-hospital lethality due to pulmonary embolism and premature mortality due to recurrent venous thromboembolism were estimated from the French national database of hospitalisation and literature data.

Results

In France, more than four million women are daily exposed to combined oral contraceptives. The mean annual number of venous thromboembolic events attributable to their use was 2,529 (778 associated to the use of first- and second-generation contraceptives and 1,751 to the use of third- and fourth-generation contraceptives), corresponding to 20 premature deaths (six with first- and second-generation contraceptives and fourteen with third- and fourth-generation contraceptives), of which there were eight to nine immediate in-hospital deaths. As compared to the use of first- and second-generation contraceptives, exposure to third- and fourth-generation contraceptives led to a mean annual excess of 1,167 venous thromboembolic events and nine premature deaths (including three immediate in-hospital deaths).

Conclusions

Corrective actions should be considered to limit exposure to third- and fourth-generation contraceptives, and thus optimise the benefit-risk ratio of combined oral contraception.