The non-human primate oocyte and embryo as a model for women, or is it vice versa?

The role of the non-human primate (NHP) oocyte and embryo in translational research is considered here including both in vitro activities directly involving oocytes or embryos as well as animal studies that impact reproductive function. Reasons to consider NHPs as animal research models along with their limitations are summarized. A case is made that in limited instances, such as in the development and application of the assisted reproductive technologies or in the study of embryonic stem cells, the human oocyte and embryo have acted as models for the monkey. The development of strategies for the preservation of fertility is used as an example of ongoing research in the non-human primate that cannot be conducted in women for ethical reasons. In animal studies, monitoring reproductive potential, responses to embryonic stem cell transplantation, along with translational research in the field of contraceptive development for women are considered as subjects that benefit from the availability of a NHP model.     

Tetrapeptide 60–63 of human ribosomal protein uS3 is crucial for translation initiation

Conserved ribosomal protein uS3 contains a decapeptide fragment in positions 55–64 (human numbering), which has a very specific ability to cross-link to various RNA derivatives bearing aldehyde groups, likely provided by K62. It has been shown that during translation in the cell-free protein-synthesizing system, uS3 becomes accessible for such cross-linking only after eIF3j leaves the mRNA binding channel of the 40S ribosomal subunit. We studied the functional role of K62 and its nearest neighbors in the ribosomal assembly and translation with the use of HEK293T-derived cell cultures capable of producing FLAG-tagged uS3 (uS3^FLAG) or its mutant form with amino acid residues at positions 60–63 replaced with alanines. Analysis of polysome profiles from the respective cells and cytosol lysates showed that the mutation significantly affected the uS3 ability to participate in the assembly of 40S subunits, but it was not essential for their maturation and did not prevent the binding of mRNAs to 40S subunits during translation initiation. The most striking effect of the replacement of amino acid residues in the above uS3 positions was that it almost completely deprived the 40S subunits of their ability to form 80S ribosomes, suggesting that the 48S pre-initiation complexes assembled on these subunits were defective in the binding of 60S subunits. Thus, our results revealed the previously unknown crucial role of the uS3 tetrapeptide ⁶⁰GEKG⁶³ in translation initiation related to maintaining the proper structure of the 48S complex, most likely via the prevention of premature mRNA loading into the ribosomal channel.     

Beyond the ABCs of CKC and SCC. Do centromeres orchestrate sister chromatid cohesion or vice versa?

The centromere-kinetochore complex is a highly specialized chromatin domain that both mediates and monitors chromosome-spindle interactions responsible for accurate partitioning of sister chromatids to daughter cells. Centromeres are distinguished from adjacent chromatin by specific patterns of histone modification and the presence of a centromere-specific histone H3 variant (e.g. CENP-A). Centromere-proximal regions usually correspond to sites of avid and persistent sister chromatid cohesion mediated by the conserved cohesin complex. In budding yeast, there is a substantial body of evidence indicating centromeres direct formation and/or stabilization of centromere-proximal cohesion. In other organisms, the dependency of cohesion on centromere function is not as clear. Indeed, it appears that pericentromeric heterochromatin recruits cohesion proteins independent of centromere function. Nonetheless, aspects of centromere function are impaired in the absence of sister chromatid cohesion, suggesting the two are interdependent. Here we review the nature of centromeric chromatin, the dynamics and regulation of sister chromatid cohesion, and the relationship between the two.     

How strong is the case for regulation of the initiation step of translation by elements at the 3' end of eukaryotic mRNAs?

The belief that initiation of translation requires communication between the 5' and 3' ends of the mRNA guides--or misguides--the interpretation of many experiments. The closed-loop model for initiation creates the expectation that sequences at the 3' end of eukaryotic mRNAs should regulate translation. This review looks closely at the evidence in three prominent cases where such regulation is claimed. The mRNAs in question encode 15-lipoxygenase, ceruloplasmin, and histones. Vertebrate histone mRNAs lack a poly(A) tail, instead of which a 3' stem-loop structure is said to promote translation by binding a protein which purportedly binds initiation factors. The proffered evidence for this hypothesis has many flaws. Temporal control of 15-lipoxygenase production in reticulocytes is often cited as another well-documented example of translational regulation via the 3' untranslated region, but inspection of the evidence reveals significant gaps and contradictions. Solid evidence is lacking also for the idea that a ribosomal protein binds to and shuts off translation of ceruloplasmin mRNA. Some viral RNAs that lack a poly(A) tail have alternative 3' structures which are said to promote translation via circularization of the mRNA, but in no case has this been shown convincingly. Interpretation of many experiments is compromised by possible effects of the 3' structures on mRNA stability rather than translation. The functional-half-life assay, which is often employed to rule out effects on mRNA stability, might not be adequate to settle the question. Other issues, such as the possibility of artifacts caused by overexpression of RNA-binding proteins, can complicate studies of translational regulation. There is no doubt that elements at the 3' end of eukaryotic mRNAs can regulate gene expression in a variety of ways. It has not been shown unequivocally that one of these ways involves direct participation of the 3' untranslated region in the initiation step of translation.     

Differential contribution of the m7G-cap to the 5′ end-dependent translation initiation of mammalian mRNAs

Many mammalian mRNAs possess long 5′ UTRs with numerous stem-loop structures. For some of them, the presence of Internal Ribosome Entry Sites (IRESes) was suggested to explain their significant activity, especially when cap-dependent translation is compromised. To test this hypothesis, we have compared the translation initiation efficiencies of some cellular 5′ UTRs reported to have IRES-activity with those lacking IRES-elements in RNA-transfected cells and cell-free systems. Unlike viral IRESes, the tested 5′ UTRs with so-called ‘cellular IRESes’ demonstrate only background activities when placed in the intercistronic position of dicistronic RNAs. In contrast, they are very active in the monocistronic context and the cap is indispensable for their activities. Surprisingly, in cultured cells or cytoplasmic extracts both the level of stimulation with the cap and the overall translation activity do not correlate with the cumulative energy of the secondary structure of the tested 5′ UTRs. The cap positive effect is still observed under profound inhibition of translation with eIF4E-BP1 but its magnitude varies for individual 5′ UTRs irrespective of the cumulative energy of their secondary structures. Thus, it is not mandatory to invoke the IRES hypothesis, at least for some mRNAs, to explain their preferential translation when eIF4E is partially inactivated.     

Effect of deletions 5′ to the translation initiation sequence on the expression of an mRNA in animal cells

To learn if an mRNA·18S rRNA interaction or a special secondary structure in the mRNA start region is essential for translation in eukaryotic cells, we constructed recombinant plasmids with the SV40 early promoter 5 to part of the Escherichia coli tuf B-lacZ gene. Deletion of bases potentially complementary to the 18S rRNA highly increased the transient -galactosidase expressed in transfected CHO cells. Deletion of bases that fostered formation of potential hairpins with the mRNA 5-terminus or altered the structure of the coding region reduced -galactosidase activity suggesting that these features of the mRNA secondary structure may be essential for initiation of translation. Computer aided analysis of the potential structure of 290 mRNAs suggests these are conserved features of the initiation region.     

The 5′-untranslated region of the mouse mammary tumor virus mRNA exhibits cap-independent translation initiation

In this study, we demonstrate the identification of an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) within the 5′-untranslated region (5′-UTR) of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV). The 5′-UTR of the full-length mRNA derived from the infectious, complete MMTV genome was cloned into a dual luciferase reporter construct containing an upstream Renilla luciferase gene (RLuc) and a downstream firefly luciferase gene (FLuc). In rabbit reticulocyte lysate, the MMTV 5′-UTR was capable of driving translation of the second cistron. In vitro translational activity from the MMTV 5′-UTR was resistant to the addition of m⁷GpppG cap-analog and cleavage of eIF4G by foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) L-protease. IRES activity was also demonstrated in the Xenopus laevis oocyte by micro-injection of capped and polyadenylated bicistronic RNAs harboring the MMTV-5′-UTR. Finally, transfection assays showed that the MMTV-IRES exhibits cell type-dependent translational activity, suggesting a requirement for as yet unidentified cellular factors for its optimal function.     

Is UAA or UGA part of the recognition signal for ribosomal initiation?

In none of the 92 published prokaryotic sequences is a translation codon preceeded by UAG as the first "termination codon". In most cases the UAA or UGA is close to the initiation codon and may be part of the ribosome recognition signal.     

Can mutation or fixation biases explain the allele frequency distribution of human single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)?

One of the most abiding controversies in evolutionary biology concerns the role of neutral processes in molecular evolution. A main focus of the debate has been the evolution of isochores, the strong and systematic variation of base composition in mammalian genomes. One set of hypotheses argue that regions of similar GC are owing to localised mutational biases coupled with neutral evolution. The alternatives point to either selection or biased gene conversion as mechanisms to preferentially remove A or T bases, favouring G and C instead. Using a novel method, we compare models including such fixation biases to models based on mutation bias alone, under the assumption that non-coding, non-repetitive human DNA is at compositional equilibrium. While failing to fully explain the allele frequency distributions of recent single nucleotide polymorphism data, we show that the data are best fitted if the mutation bias is assumed to be constant across the genome, while fixation bias varies with GC content. We also attempt to estimate the strength of fixation bias, which increases linearly with increasing GC. Our approximation suggests that this force exists within the necessary parameter range: it is not so weak as to be drowned by random drift, but not so strong as to lead to exclusive use of G and C alone. Together these results demonstrate that mutation bias fails to explain the evolution of isochores, and suggest that either selection or biased gene conversion are involved.     

Cap-independent translation initiation of Apaf-1 mRNA based on a scanning mechanism is determined by some features of the secondary structure of its 5′ untranslated region

We have earlier shown that the 5′-untranslated region (5′ UTR) of the mRNA coding for activation factor of apoptotic peptidase 1 (Apaf-1) can direct translation in vivo by strictly 5′ end-dependent way even in the absence of m⁷G-cap. Dependence of translational efficiency on the cap availability for this mRNA turned out to be relatively low. In this study we demonstrate that this surprising phenomenon is determined the 5′-proximal part (domains I and II) of highly structured Apaf-1 5′ UTR. Remarkably, domain II by itself was able to reduce dependence of the mRNA on the cap on its transferring to a short 5′ UTR derived from a standard vector. We suggest that the low cap-dependence inherent to some cellular mRNAs may have an important physiological significance under those stress conditions when the function of cap-binding factor eIF4E is impaired.     

Ligand binding reveals protonation events at the active site of cytochrome c oxidase; is the K-pathway used for the transfer of H(+) or OH(-)?

We have investigated the CO-recombination kinetics after flash photolysis of CO from the "half-reduced" cytochrome c oxidase as a function of pH. In addition, the reaction was investigated in mutant enzymes in which Lys(I-362) and Ser(I-299), located approximately in the middle of the K-pathway and near the enzyme surface, respectively, were modified. Laser-flash induced dissociation of CO is followed by rapid internal electron transfer from heme a(3) to a. At pH>7 this electron transfer is associated with proton release to the bulk solution (tau congruent with 1 ms at pH 8). Thus, the CO-recombination kinetics reflects protonation events at the catalytic site. In the wild-type enzyme, below pH approximately 7, the main component in the CO-recombination displayed a rate of approximately 20 s(-1). Above pH approximately 7, a slow CO-recombination component developed with a rate that decreased from approximately 8 s(-1) at pH 8 to approximately 1 s(-1) at pH 10. This slow component was not observed with KM(I-362), while with the SD(I-299)/SG(I-299) mutant enzymes at each pH it was slower than with the wild-type enzyme. The results are interpreted in terms of proton release from H(2)O in the catalytic site after CO dissociation, followed by OH(-) binding to the oxidized heme a(3). The CO-recombination kinetics is proposed to be determined by the protonation rate of OH(-) and not dissociation of OH(-), i.e. the K-pathway transfers protons and not OH(-). With the KM(I-362) mutant enzyme the proton is not released, i.e. OH(-) is not formed. With the SD(I-299)/SG(I-299) mutant enzymes the proton is released, but both the release and uptake are slowed by the mutations. During reaction of the reduced enzyme with O(2), the H(2)O at the binuclear center is most likely involved as a proton donor in the O-O cleavage reaction.     

Africa or Asia, which is the evolutionary origin of human schistosomes?]

The origin and the evolution of Schistosomatidae species, due to their medical importance (responsible of the second most important human parasitosis after malaria), arouse a great interest. A combination of phylogenetic studies using several molecular markers has provided support for the traditional grouping and evolutionary inferences derived from morphological and biological data. The genus Schistosoma, which comprises all species parasitizing Man, is generally split into four evolutionary lineages (mansoni, haematobium, indicum and japonicum lineages). The group of African schistosomes (including mansoni and haematobium lineages) appears very divergent from the japonicum lineage. Recent phylogenetic studies using partial 28S rDNA sequencing and including Orientobilharzia turkestanicum from Iran, an Asian parasite of livestock, found, unexpectedly, that this species nested among Schistosoma species, thus rendering the latter paraphyletic, and suggested an Asian origin for the Schistosoma genus. The present work re-examines the question of the geographical origin of human schistosomes by analysing a new genomic marker (ITS2) as well as by including the use of O. turkestanicum originating from northeastern China. Our results are in agreement with previous work using 28S, in demonstrating that Schistosoma is not monophyletic. However, O. turkestanicum, whatever the method of analysis used (distance or parsimony), was grouped with members of the japonicum group to the exclusion of African Schistosoma species. Then, our data argue strongly for the need for further phylogenetic study including new taxa and new genomic sequences before definitely concluding either an Asian or African origin for the genus Schistosoma.     

Do different dispersal capacities influence the biogeography of the western Palearctic dragonflies (Odonata)?

The biogeography of the western Palearctic has been intensively studied for more than a century. Recent advances in genetics have allowed the testing of old theories based on distribution patterns, although these analyses are obviously restricted to a reduced number of specific genetic data sets. On the other hand, an increased knowledge on the distributions of species and advances in computer capacities have allowed more detailed biogeographical analyses based on species presence/absence. In the present study, we selected the Odonata as the study group. For all 162 species native to the western Palearctic, we compiled their respective presence or absence in 97 predefined biogeographical regions. Using cluster analyses and principal component analyses, both based on Jaccard similarity coefficients, we analysed the differentiation among these regions and species. In subsequent analyses, the data set was reduced to the Zygoptera, Anisoptera, and the western Palearctic endemics. All analyses consistently showed different faunal regions and faunal elements. In particular, the (1) western and (2) eastern Mediterranean; (3) Central and (4) Northern Europe; and (5) the British Isles were invariably found in all cases. Although the two major Mediterranean regions were characterized by several endemic faunal elements, Northern Europe and the British Isles lacked such elements, but were characterized by faunal compositions strongly deviating from the rest of the western Palearctic region. Moderate differences between Zygoptera and Anisoptera existed, with the latter more clearly redrawing the Mediterranean refuge areas, whereas the former reflected to a greater extent the postglacial expansion patterns from these regions. In general, our findings underline the old biogeographical theories, but refine especially our understanding of the Atlanto‐ and Ponto‐Mediterranean region. Central Europe, comprising the area with the highest species numbers of our whole study region, unravels as a crossroad of postglacial immigrations, but might also represent a region of in situ glacial survival. © 2010 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 99 , 177–195.     

To include or not to include (the invader in community analyses)? That is the question

An increasing number of studies report impacts from invasive species on community metrics or ecosystem functions. We draw attention to an issue arising whenever impact is measured on a community where the invader is an integrated part: should or shouldn’t the attributes of the invader itself be included in the data-analysis? We identify many examples from the published literature showing inconsistency in whether or not data for the invader is included or excluded, and discuss potential implications for ecological interpretations. We also provide a case study to show that the invasive seaweed Undaria pinnatifida can be interpreted to have strong or no impact on seaweed communities, depending on its inclusion or exclusion in the data analysis. We conclude that it is critical for studies to (1) clearly state in the methods section, if the invaders are included or excluded from the data-analysis, (2) acknowledge potential differences in outcomes when comparing results based on different methods, and (3) analyze, if possible, impacts both with and without the invader. Finally, we note that this ‘inclusion versus exclusion’ conundrum is not only relevant to invasion biology, but to any field where the test-object of interest can be an integrated part of the response, such as when impact of seaweed blooms are analysed on community productivity or community effects are quantified over time from ecological pulse-perturbation experiments.     

To clear,or not to clear (senescent cells)? That is the question

Cellular senescence is an anti‐proliferative program that restricts the propagation of cells subjected to different kinds of stress. Cellular senescence was initially described as a cell‐autonomous tumor suppressor mechanism that triggers an irreversible cell cycle arrest that prevents the proliferation of damaged cells at risk of neoplastic transformation. However, discoveries during the last decade have established that senescent cells can also impact the surrounding tissue microenvironment and the neighboring cells in a non‐cell‐autonomous manner. These non‐cell‐autonomous activities are, in part, mediated by the selective secretion of extracellular matrix degrading enzymes, cytokines, chemokines and immune modulators, which collectively constitute the senescence‐associated secretory phenotype. One of the key functions of the senescence‐associated secretory phenotype is to attract immune cells, which in turn can orchestrate the elimination of senescent cells. Interestingly, the clearance of senescent cells seems to be critical to dictate the net effects of cellular senescence. As a general rule, the successful elimination of senescent cells takes place in processes that are considered beneficial, such as tumor suppression, tissue remodeling and embryonic development, while the chronic accumulation of senescent cells leads to more detrimental consequences, namely, cancer and aging. Nevertheless, exceptions to this rule may exist. Now that cellular senescence is in the spotlight for both anti‐cancer and anti‐aging therapies, understanding the precise underpinnings of senescent cell removal will be essential to exploit cellular senescence to its full potential.