Tolerance-like condition developing in mice under the effect of antigen of erythrocyte lysate]

Lysate of sheep red blood cells obtained by the treatment of these cells with distilled water and purified by ultracentrifugation in cold possessed a weak immunogenicity. Its administration to mice caused the state of hyporeactivity to sheep red blood cells (a reduction of the immune response level to 10-25% of control. The capacity of the mise spleen cells to respond by immune reaction to the red blood cells following adoptive transfer was not disturbed. At the early periods after the lysate administrations the mouse spleen cells possessed a weak supressive activity in case of their transfer to the intact animals. The blood serum of mice treated with the lysate possessed a blocking activity which disappeared after the serum absorption with sheep red blood cells. A conclusion was drawn that hyporeactivity originating in mice after the lysate administration was caused by the presence in the serum of antibodies inhibiting the immune response.     

Substance P and antinociception

Substance P (SP)-induced antinociception is still a topic of controversy. Some investigators have failed to see an antinociceptive effect of SP, particularly following intraperitoneal administration. In the present experiments SP induced significant hot plate antinociception in male mice, following intraperitoneal administration. SP exhibited a bell-shaped dose response curve, and the antinociceptive effect was dependent on the pH of the vehicle. The antinociceptive effect of SP lasted for at least 1 hr and was naloxone-reversible. The antinociceptive effect of SP could be prevented by housing subjects collectively rather than individually during the experiment. In conclusion, the bell-shaped dose response curve, the solution pH and different testing procedures all influence the effects of SP on nociception. Given this complexity, it is not surprising that some experiments fail to demonstrate antinociception following SP administration.     

Cholinergic-NO-cGMP mediation of sildenafil-induced antinociception

Acetylcholine and cholinomimetic agents with predominant muscarinic action are known to increase the concentration of cGMP by activation of nitric oxide signaling pathway in the nociceptive conditions. The present study was aimed to investigate the NO-cGMP-PDE5 pathway in nociceptive conditions in the experimental animals. Nociceptive threshold was assessed by acetic acid-induced writhing assay (chemonociception) or carrageenan-induced hyperalgesia. Sildenafil [1-5 mg/kg, ip, 50-200 microg/paw, intraplantar (ipl)] produced dose dependent antinociception in both the tested models. Coadministration of acetylcholine (50 mcg/paw, ipl) or cholinomimetic agent, neostigmine (0.1 mcg/kg, ip and 25 ng/paw, ipl) augmented the peripheral antinociceptive effect of sildenafil. This effect was sensitive to blockade by L-NAME (20 mg/kg, ip, 100 microg/paw, ipl), a non-selective NOS inhibitor and methylene blue (1 mg/kg, ip), a guanylate cyclase inhibitor, which per se had little or no effect in both the models of nociception. Further, the per se analgesic effect of acetylcholine and neostigmine was blocked by both L-NAME and methylene blue in the models of nociception, suggesting the activation of NO-cGMP pathway. Also, both L-NAME and methylene blue blocked the per se analgesic effect of sildenafil. These results indicate the peripheral accumulation of cGMP may be responsible for antinociceptive effect, and a possible interaction between cholinergic agents and PDE5 system in models of nociception.     

Chimeric peptide of Met-enkephalin and FMRFa induces antinociception and attenuates development of tolerance to morphine antinociception.

A synthetic chimeric peptide of Met-enkephalin and FMRFamide (YGGFMKKKFMRFa), based on MERF was synthesized. This peptide was tested for possible antinociceptive effects using the tail flick test in mice. The effect of the chimeric peptide on morphine antinociception and development of tolerance to the antinociceptive action of morphine was also investigated. The chimeric peptide produced significant, dose-dependent antinociception (40, 60 and 90 mg/kg) in the tail flick test. Pretreatment with naloxone (5 mg/kg, IP) significantly attenuated the antinociceptive effect induced by the chimeric peptide (90 mg/kg, IP), indicating involvement of an opioidergic mechanism. In combination experiments with morphine, the antinociceptive dose of the chimeric peptide (60 mg/kg, IP) potentiated morphine (7 mg/kg, IP) antinociception. A low dose of the chimeric peptide (10 mg/kg, IP), that did not produce significant antinociception on its own, also potentiated morphine antinociception. In the tolerance studies, male albino mice received twice daily injections of morphine (20 mg/kg, IP) followed by either saline (0.1 ml) or chimeric peptide (80 mg/kg, IP) for a period of 4 days. A control group received twice daily injections of saline (0.1 ml) for the same period. When tested on Day 5, tolerance to antinociceptive action of morphine (15 mg/kg, IP) was evidenced by decreased response in chronic morphine plus saline treated mice compared to control group. Concurrent administration of chimeric peptide (80 mg/kg, IP) with morphine significantly attenuated the development of tolerance to the antinociceptive action of morphine. The preliminary results of this study demonstrate that peripherally administered chimeric peptide can produce dose dependent, naloxone reversible, antinociception; potentiate morphine antinociception and attenuate morphine tolerance, indicating a possible role of these type of amphiactive sequences in antinociception and its modulation. These chimeric peptides may also prove to be useful tools for further ascertaining the role of FMRFa family of peptides in mechanisms leading to opiate tolerance and dependence.     

Stereospecificity of intraventricularly administered acetylmethylcholine antinociception.

We have previously reported that the intraventricular injection of acetylcholine increases latency in the mouse tail-flick test, the ED50 being 7.3 ug (1). This effect was reversed by five narcotic-antagonist analgesics in the same order of potency in which they antagonized morphine, and was found to be due to muscarinic receptor stimulation. It was also pointed out at that time that the intraventricular injection of acetylcholine would block the writhing response to intraperitoneally administered p-phenyl-quinone. In this preliminary communication, we present our results of the effect of the intraventricular injection of acetyl-choline on writhing induced by intraperitoneally administered acetylcholine. In addition, we present results of our studies in which we demonstrated stereospecificity of intravetricularly administered ministered acetylmethylcholines in causing antinociception.     

Types of opioid receptors: relation to antinociception

The endogenous opioid peptides are derived from three large precursors. Pro-opiocortin and proenkephalin yield [Met]enkephalin, carboxy-extended [Met]enkephalins and [Leu]enkephalin. The fragments of prodynorphin are all carboxy-extended [Leu]enkephalins. Three approaches are of importance for an analysis of the physiological functions of the different endogenous opioid peptides. First, since these peptides interact with more than one of the mu-, delta- and kappa-binding sites and thus with their receptors, it is necessary to synthesize peptides or non-peptides, which bind to only one of the sites. As far as narcotic analgesics are concerned, morphine fulfils these conditions since it interacts almost exclusively with the mu-receptor. Secondly, antagonists are required that are selective for only one of the opioid receptors, even when used in high concentrations. Finally, it is important to find circumscribed areas in the nervous system that possess only one type of opioid receptor. It is now known that in the rabbit cerebellum the opioid receptors are almost exclusively of the mu-type whereas in the guinea-pig cerebellum they are almost exclusively of the kappa-type.     

Central oxytocin enhances antinociception in the rat

The study aimed to investigate the effect of oxytocin on antinociception in the rat. The pain threshold was elevated by oxytocin following intraventricular (icv) or intrathecal injection (ith), and reduced by anti-oxytocin serum (icv or ith). But the pain threshold was not altered by intravenous injection (iv) of oxytocin or anti-oxytocin serum. Pain stimulation induced oxytocin concentration decrease in the hypothalamic supraoptic nucleus, and increase in the locus coeruleus, raphe magnus nucleus, caudate nucleus and spinal cord, but no change in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus and plasma. The results indicated that central, not peripheral oxytocin could enhance antinociception.     

Central administration of neuronostatin induces antinociception in mice

Neuronostatin, a recently discovered endogenous bioactive peptide, was encoded by pro-mRNA of somatostatin that contributes to modulation of nociception. However, nociceptive effect of neuronostatin is still not fully known. The aim of this study was to evaluate effect of neuronostatin on nociception and elucidate its possible mechanism of action. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of neuronostatin (0.3, 3, 6, 12 nmol/mouse) produced a dose- and time-related antinociceptive effect in the tail immersion assay in mice, an acute pain model. The antinociceptive effect of neuronostatin was significantly antagonized by naloxone, and was strongly inhibited by co-injection with β-funaltrexamine or nor-binaltorphimine, but not by naltrindole. Also, melanocortin 3/4 receptor antagonist, SHU9119, completely blocked the effect of neuronostatin. These data indicated the involvement of both μ- and κ-opioid receptors and central melanocortin system in the analgesic response induced by neuronostatin. In addition, neuronostatin (6 nmol, i.c.v.) increased c-Fos protein expression in the periaqueductal gray (PAG) and the nucleus raphe magnus (NRM) that have a pivotal role in regulating descending pain pathways. Taken together, this study is the first to reveal that neuronostatin produces antinociceptive effect via opioid and central melanocortin systems, which is associated with an increase in neuronal activity the PAG and NRM.     

Green light induces antinociception via visual-somatosensory circuits

1. Download : Download high-res image (172KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Glucagon is an antagonist of morphine bradycardia and antinociception

Glucagon and its receptors have been identified within the mammalian brain, and their anatomical distribution correlates well with the distribution of opioid peptides and their receptors. To evaluate possible physiological interactions between these two peptidergic systems, we examined the effects of glucagon on two opioid responses - bradycardia and antinociception. Glucagon administered either intravenously (iv) (100-1000 micrograms/kg) or intracerebroventricularly (icv) (5 micrograms) significantly attenuated morphine-induced (200 micrograms/kg, iv) bradycardia without producing any alterations in cardiovascular parameters when given alone. Furthermore, glucagon did not antagonize the bradycardia produced by phenyldiguanide (10 micrograms/kg, iv), a non-opioid substance. Peripheral (1 mg/kg, iv) and central (5 micrograms, icv) glucagon pretreatment antagonized morphine-induced (7.5 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) antinociception by 67% and 86%, respectively, at 30 minutes (as determined by the hot plate test). Glucagon treatment alone at these doses did not alter baseline response latencies. In both cases, central injections of glucagon were more effective than iv injections in antagonizing morphine's effects. These findings demonstrate a central action for glucagon and provide the first evidence that this neuropeptide may function as an endogenous antagonist of opioid actions.     

L-NAME causes antinociception by stimulation of the arginine-NO-cGMP pathway

NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) has been used extensively as a paradigmatic inhibitor of NO synthase and has been shown to cause antinociception in several experimental models. We describe here how L-NAME produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect when injected intraperitoneally in the mouse after acetic acid induced writhings, or intraplantarly in the rat paw pressure hyperalgesia induced by carrageenin or prostaglandin E2. In contrast another NO synthase inhibitor, NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), had no significant effect per se but inhibited L-NAME systemic induced antinociception in mice and local induced antinociception in the rat paw hyperalgesia test. D-NAME had no antinociceptive effect upon carrageenin-induced hyperalgesia. Pretreatment of the paws with two inhibitors of guanylate cyclase, methylene blue (MB) and 1H-:[1,2,4]-oxadiazolo-:[4,3-a] quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ) abolished the antinociceptive effect of L-NAME. L-Arginine and the cGMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor, MY 5445 significantly enhanced the L-NAME antinociceptive effect. The central antinociceptive effect of L-NAME was blocked by co-administration of L-NMMA, ODQ and MB. The present series of experiments shows that L-NAME, but not L-NMMA, has an antinociceptive effect. It can be suggested that L-NAME causes the antinociceptive effect by stimulation of the arginine/ NO/ cGMP pathway, since the antinociceptive effect of L-NAME can be antagonized by L-NMMA and abolished by the guanylate cyclase inhibitors (MB and ODQ). In addition, the NO synthase substrate, L-arginine and the cGMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor, MY5445 were seen to potentiate the effects of L-NAME. Thus, L-NAME used alone, has limitations as a specific inhibitor of the arginine-NO-cGMP pathway and may therefore be a poor pharmacological tool for use in characterising participation in pathophysiological processes.     

Imipramine-fentanyl antinociception in a rabbit tooth pulp model

Antinociception of imipramine (I) and its effect in combination with fentanyl (F) was evaluated in rabbits using electrically-induced lick chew responses via tooth pulp stimulation as the model of nociception. Acute i.v. injections of I elicited a graded dose response comparable to i.v. morphine (M) with I ED 50 = 4.35 mg/kg (2.31-8.14, 95% CL) and M ED 50 = 1.81 mg/kg (1.11-3.90), with no differences in the slopes between the two curves. The lethal dose of I was 10 mg/kg. An i.v. dose of I twice the ED 50 elicited an antinociceptive effect of more than 50% maximum possible effect (MPE) for 90 minutes with peak effect of 82% MPE occurring at 15 minutes. These effects of I were not reversed by a morphine-reversal dose of naloxone (0.1 mg/kg i.v.) but were reversed with a ten fold dose of naloxone. F ED 50 values (mcg/kg) were lowered from 11.35 to 2.70, 0.74 and 0.33 with increasing pretreatment doses of I (1.0, 2.1 and 3.2 mg/kg). These magnitudes of potency increases of F were 4.2, 15.3 and 34.4 fold respectively. A single i.v. ED 50 dose of I extended the time to 50% MPE of an ED 90 dose of F from 26 minutes to 77 minutes; of a 2 X ED 50 dose of F from 17 minutes to 28 minutes. Data points for three different combinations of I and F fell significantly within the synergistic field of an ED 50 isobologram and a polynomial equation described the curve best fitting the data points. F alone (i.v. ED 50 dose) increased the PaCO2 values to 74% above controls and three different combinations with I showed no increases in PaCO2 values above controls. I alone did not significantly cause any change in PaCO2 values from controls.     

Modulation of morphine induced antinociception by intracerebroventricularly administered captopril

Captopril when administered intracerebroventricularly (icv) in doses of 100, 300, 500 and 1000 micrograms induced a dose dependent antinociceptive effect in rats. Naloxone pretreatment (10 mg/kg, ip) completely antagonised antinociceptive effect of captopril, suggesting thereby the involvement of brain enkephalinergic system. Captopril 300 micrograms, icv potentiated the antinociceptive effect of morphine in intact animals. The bilateral adrenalectomy did not have any effect on this potentiation as against the reported blockade of potentiation in adrenalectomized animals when captopril was administered by systemic route. Thus potentiation of morphine induced antinociception by icv captopril is unlikely to be exerted through an effect on adrenal function and is most likely due to increased brain enkephalin levels.     

N型钙通道与疼痛

N型电压依赖性钙通道(VDCCs)在疼痛的传递与调控中具有重要作用。它们密集分布于脊髓背角伤害感受性神经元突触前末梢,参与主要疼痛介质如谷氨酸和P物质等释放的调节。通过阻断上述通道,选择性N型VDCCs阻断剂表现出强效镇痛作用,N型VDCCs Cav2．2亚基基因敲除小鼠也表现为痛阈提高。N型VDCCs还分布于自主神经系统和中枢神经系统突触部位,现有的N型VDCCs阻断剂用于疼痛治疗时出现的各种副作用与这些部位的突触抑制有关。最近发现,背根节伤害感受性神经元上存在一种特异的N型VDCCs亚型,这为疼痛治疗提供了一个非常有意义的新靶标。