Chromosome nondisjunction in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis> strains mutant for tumor suppressor Merlin

The effect of mutation for gene Merlin on chromosome disjunction in Drosophila during meiosis was genetically studied. Chromosome nondisjunction was not registered in females heterozygous for this mutation and containing structurally normal X chromosomes. In cases when these females additionally contained inversion in one of chromosomes X, a tendency toward the appearance of nondisjunction events was observed in individuals containing mutation in the heterozygote. The genetic construct was obtained allowing the overexpression of protein corresponding to a sterile allele Mer ³ in the germ cell line. This construct relieves the lethal effect of Mer ⁴ mutation. The ectopic expression of this mutant protein leads to chromosome nondisjunction in male meiosis.     

The Genetic Analysis of Distributive Segregation in Drosophila Melanogaster. I. Isolation and Characterization of Aberrant X Segregation (Axs), a Mutation Defective in Chromosome Partner Choice

We describe the isolation and characterization of Aberrant X segregation (Axs), a dominant female-specific meiotic mutation. Although Axs has little or no effect on the frequency or distribution of exchange, or on the disjunction of exchange bivalents, nonexchange X chromosomes undergo nondisjunction at high frequencies in Axs/+ and Axs/Axs females. This increased X chromosome nondisjunction is shown to be a consequence of an Axs-induced defect in distributive segregation. In Axs-bearing females, fourth chromosome nondisjunction is observed only in the presence of nonexchange X chromosomes and is argued to be the result of improper X and fourth chromosome associations within the distributive system. In XX females bearing a compound fourth chromosome, the frequency of nonhomologous disjunction of the X chromosomes from the compound fourth chromosome is shown to account for at least 80% of the total X nondisjunction observed. In addition, Axs diminishes or ablates the capacity of nonexchange X chromosomes to form trivalents in females bearing either a Y chromosome or a small free duplication for the X. Axs also impairs compound X from Y segregation. The effect of Axs on these segregations parallels the defects observed for homologous nonexchange X chromosome disjunction in Axs females. In addition to its dramatic effects on the X chromosome, Axs exerts a similar effect on the segregation of a major autosome. We conclude that Axs defines a locus required for proper homolog disjunction within the distributive system.     

Double or Nothing: A Drosophila Mutation Affecting Meiotic Chromosome Segregation in Both Females and Males

We describe a Drosophila mutation, Double or nothing (Dub), that causes meiotic nondisjunction in a conditional, dominant manner. Previously isolated mutations in Drosophila specifically affect meiosis either in females or males, with the exception of the mei-S332 and ord genes which are required for proper sister-chromatid cohesion. Dub is unusual in that it causes aberrant chromosome segregation almost exclusively in meiosis I in both sexes. In Dub mutant females both nonexchange and exchange chromosomes undergo nondisjunction, but the effect of Dub on nonexchange chromosomes is more pronounced. Dub reduces recombination levels slightly. Multiple nondisjoined chromosomes frequently cosegregate to the same pole. Dub results in nondisjunction of all chromosomes in meiosis I of males, although the levels are lower than in females. When homozygous, Dub is a conditional lethal allele and exhibits phenotypes consistent with cell death.     

Semidominant effect of the l(1)ts403 (sbr10) mutation on nondisjunction of sex chromosomes in meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster females exposed to heat

The sbr gene of Drosophila melanogaster belongs to the NXF (nuclear export factor) family responsible for the mRNA transport from nucleus to cytoplasm. We have shown that in the heat-exposed (37 degrees C, 1 h) females, the l(1)ts403 (sbr10) mutation leads, in particular, to the high-frequency nondisjunction and loss of sex chromosomes in meiosis. For this trait, the incomplete dominance of the sbr10 mutation is observed. At the same time, the sbr10 mutation is recessive for many other traits of the heat-exposed flies: reduced viability, low fertility, impaired synthesis of the heat shock proteins, etc. The females heterozygous for the null allele (Df(1)vL4, a deletion eliminating gene srb) do not differ from females homozygous for the wild-type allele in frequency of the heat shock-induced nondisjunction and loss of sex chromosomes in meiosis. Because of this, the sbr10 mutation can be assigned to the gain-of-function alleles (those gaining the dominance function). Expression of the mutant sbr10 allele against the background of the wild-type allele suggests that in the heat shock-exposed females, the heat-modified product of this ts allele has a strong effect on sex chromosome disjunction in meiosis.     

A deficiency screen of the major autosomes identifies a gene (matrimony) that is haplo-insufficient for achiasmate segregation in Drosophila oocytes

In Drosophila oocytes, euchromatic homolog-homolog associations are released at the end of pachytene, while heterochromatic pairings persist until metaphase I. A screen of 123 autosomal deficiencies for dominant effects on achiasmate chromosome segregation has identified a single gene that is haplo-insufficient for homologous achiasmate segregation and whose product may be required for the maintenance of such heterochromatic pairings. Of the deficiencies tested, only one exhibited a strong dominant effect on achiasmate segregation, inducing both X and fourth chromosome nondisjunction in FM7/X females. Five overlapping deficiencies showed a similar dominant effect on achiasmate chromosome disjunction and mapped the haplo-insufficient meiotic gene to a small interval within 66C7-12. A P-element insertion mutation in this interval exhibits a similar dominant effect on achiasmate segregation, inducing both high levels of X and fourth chromosome nondisjunction in FM7/X females and high levels of fourth chromosome nondisjunction in X/X females. The insertion site for this P element lies immediately upstream of CG18543, and germline expression of a UAS-CG18543 cDNA construct driven by nanos-GAL4 fully rescues the dominant meiotic defect. We conclude that CG18543 is the haplo-insufficient gene and have renamed this gene matrimony (mtrm). Cytological studies of prometaphase and metaphase I in mtrm hemizygotes demonstrate that achiasmate chromosomes are not properly positioned with respect to their homolog on the meiotic spindle. One possible, albeit speculative, interpretation of these data is that the presence of only a single copy of mtrm disrupts the function of whatever "glue" holds heterochromatically paired homologs together from the end of pachytene until metaphase I.     

Coincident maternal meiotic nondisjunction of chromosomes X and 21 without evidence of autosomal aysnapsis

Summary A family in which the proband showed phenotypic signs of both the Turner and Down syndromes was studied cytogenetically and with restriction fragment length polymorphisms. The proband's karyotype was 46,X,+21, showing double aneuploidy without any signs of mosaicism. The single X and one chromosome 21 were of paternal origin while two chromosomes 21 were of maternal origin. The nondisjunction of chromosome 21 took place in maternal meiosis II. If it is assumed that the absence of mosaicism renders postzygotic mitotic loss of the X chromosome unlikely, then the X chromosome would have been lost in maternal meiosis I or II. Recombination had occurred between the nondisjoined chromosomes 21. We conclude that double nondisjunction took place in one parent and that asynapsis was not a prerequisite for the autosomal nondisjunction.     

Construction and behavior of circularly permuted and telocentric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

We developed techniques that allow us to construct novel variants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomes. These modified chromosomes have precisely determined structures. A metacentric derivative of chromosome III which lacks the telomere-associated X and Y' elements, which are found at the telomeres of most yeast chromosomes, behaves normally in both mitosis and meiosis. We made a circularly permuted telocentric version of yeast chromosome III whose closest telomere was 33 kilobases from the centromere. This telocentric chromosome was lost at a frequency of 1.6 X 10(-5) per cell compared with a frequency of 4.0 X 10(-6) for the natural metacentric version of chromosome III. An extremely telocentric chromosome whose closet telomere was only 3.5 kilobases from the centromere was lost at a frequency of 6.0 X 10(-5). The mitotic stability of telocentric chromosomes shows that the very high frequency of nondisjunction observed for short linear artificial chromosomes is not due to inadequate centromere-telomere separation.     

A 48,XXY,+21 Down syndrome patient with additional paternal X and maternal 21

Summary The origin of meiotic nondisjunction of the extra chromosomes X and 21 was studied in a patient with the karyotype 48,XXY,+21 using DNA polymorphisms. The extra chromosome X was the result of paternal first meiotic nondisjunction of X and Y. The extra chromosome 21 was derived from the mother. The meiotic error in the mother most probably occurred in meiosis II. Thus, this is a combination caused by the chance occurrence of two independent events.     

Lack of Checkpoint Control at the Metaphase/Anaphase Transition: A Mechanism of Meiotic Nondisjunction in Mammalian Females

A checkpoint mechanism operates at the metaphase/anaphase transition to ensure that a bipolar spindle is formed and that all the chromosomes are aligned at the spindle equator before anaphase is initiated. Since mistakes in the segregation of chromosomes during meiosis have particularly disastrous consequences, it seems likely that the meiotic cell division would be characterized by a stringent metaphase/ anaphase checkpoint. To determine if the presence of an unaligned chromosome activates the checkpoint and delays anaphase onset during mammalian female meiosis, we investigated meiotic cell cycle progression in murine oocytes from XO females and control siblings. Despite the fact that the X chromosome failed to align at metaphase in a significant proportion of cells, we were unable to detect a delay in anaphase onset. Based on studies of cell cycle kinetics, the behavior and segregation of the X chromosome, and the aberrant behavior and segregation of autosomal chromosomes in oocytes from XO females, we conclude that mammalian female meiosis lacks chromosome-mediated checkpoint control. The lack of this control mechanism provides a biological explanation for the high incidence of meiotic nondisjunction in the human female. Furthermore, since available evidence suggests that a stringent checkpoint mechanism operates during male meiosis, the lack of a comparable checkpoint in females provides a reason for the difference in the error rate between oogenesis and spermatogenesis.     

Genetic Analysis of Sex Chromosomal Meiotic Mutants in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

A total of 209 ethyl methanesulfonate-treated X chromosomes were screened for meiotic mutants that either (1) increased sex or fourth chromosome nondisjunction at either meiotic division in males; (2) allowed recombination in such males; (3) increased nondisjunction of the X chromosome at either meiotic division in females; or (4) caused such females, when mated to males heterozygous for Segregation-Distorter (SD) and a sensitive homolog to alter the strength of meiotic drive in males.-Twenty male-specific meiotic mutants were found. Though the rates of nondisjunction differed, all twenty mutants were qualitatively similar in that (1) they alter the disjunction of the X chromosome from the Y chromosome; (2) among the recovered sex-chromosome exceptional progeny, there is a large excess of those derived from nullo-XY as compared to XY gametes; (3) there is a negative correlation between the frequency of sex-chromosome exceptional progeny and the frequency of males among the regular progeny. In their effects on meiosis these mutants are similar to In(1)sc(4L)sc(8R), which is deleted for the basal heterochromatin. These mutants, however, have normal phenotypes and viabilities when examined as X/0 males, and furthermore, a mapping of two of the mutants places them in the euchromatin of the X chromosome. It is suggested that these mutants are in genes whose products are involved in insuring the proper functioning of the basal pairing sites which are deleted in In(1)sc(4L)sc(8R), and in addition that there is a close connection, perhaps causal, between the disruption of normal X-Y pairing (and, therefore, disjunction) and the occurrence of meiotic drive in the male.-Eleven mutants were found which increased nondisjunction in females. These mutants were characterized as to (1) the division at which they acted; (2) their effect on recombination; (3) their dominance; (4) their effects on disjunction of all four chromosome pairs. Five female mutants caused a nonuniform decrease in recombination, being most pronounced in distal regions, and an increase in first division nondisjunction of all chromosome pairs. Their behavior is consistent with the hypothesis that these mutants are defective in a process which is a precondition for exchange. Two female mutants were allelic and caused a uniform reduction in recombination for all intervals (though to different extents for the two alleles) and an increase in first-division nondisjunction of all chromosomes. Limited recombination data suggest that these mutants do not alter coincidence, and thus, following the arguments of Sandler et al. (1968), are defective in exchange rather than a precondiiton for exchange. A single female mutant behaves in a manner that is consistent with it being a defect in a gene whose functioning is essential for distributive pairing. Three of the female meiotic mutants cause abnormal chromosome behavior at a number of times in meiosis. Thus, nondisjunction at both meiotic divisions is increased, recombinant chromosomes nondisjoin, and there is a polarized alteration in recombination.-The striking differences between the types of control of meiosis in the two sexes is discussed and attention is drawn to the possible similarities between (1) the disjunction functions of exchange and the process specified by the chromosome-specific male mutants; and (2) the prevention of functional aneuploid gamete formation by distributive disjunction and meiotic drive.     

There are two mechanisms of achiasmate segregation in Drosophila females, one of which requires heterochromatic homology.

There are numerous examples of the regular segregation of achiasmate chromosomes at meiosis I in Drosophila melanogaster females. Classically, the choice of achiasmate segregational partners has been thought to be independent of homology, but rather made on the basis of availability or similarities in size and shape. To the contrary, we show here that heterochromatic homology plays a primary role in ensuring the proper segregation of achiasmate homologs. We observe that the heterochromatin of chromosome 4 functions as, or contains, a meiotic pairing site. We show that free duplications carrying the 4th chromosome pericentric heterochromatin induce high frequencies of 4th chromosome nondisjunction regardless of their size. Moreover, a duplication from which some of the 4th chromosome heterochromatin has been removed is unable to induce 4th chromosome nondisjunction. Similarly, in the absence of either euchromatic homology or a size similarity, duplications bearing the X chromosome heterochromatin also disrupt the segregation of two achiasmate X chromosome centromeres. Although heterochromatic regions are sufficient to conjoin nonexchange homologues, we confirm that the segregation of heterologous chromosomes is determined by size, shape, and availability. The meiotic mutation Axs differentiates between these two processes of achiasmate centromere coorientation by disrupting only the homology-dependent mechanism. Thus there are two different mechanisms by which achiasmate segregational partners are chosen. We propose that the absence of diplotene-diakinesis during female meiosis allows heterochromatic pairings to persist until prometaphase and thus to co-orient homologous centromeres. We also propose that heterologous disjunctions result from a separate and homology-independent process that likely occurs during prometaphase. The latter process, which may not require the physical association of segregational partners, is similar to those observed in many insects, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and in C. elegans males. We also suggest that the physical basis of this process may reflect known properties of the Drosophila meiotic spindle.     

Semidominant Effect of the l(1)ts403 (sbr 10) Mutation on Sex Chromosome Nondsjunction in Meiosis in Drosophila melanogaster Females Exposed to Heat

The sbrgene of Drosophila melanogasterbelongs to the NXF(nuclear export factor) family responsible for the mRNA transport from nucleus to cytoplasm. We have shown that in the heat-exposed (37°C, 1 h) females, the l(1)ts403(sbr ¹⁰) mutation leads, in particular, to the high-frequency nondisjunction and loss of sex chromosomes in meiosis. For this trait, the incomplete dominance of the sbr ¹⁰ mutation is observed. At the same time, the sbr ¹⁰ mutation is recessive for many other traits of the heat-exposed flies: reduced viability, low fertility, impaired synthesis of the heat shock proteins, etc. The females heterozygous for the null allele (Df(1)v ^L4, a deletion eliminating gene srb) do not differ from females homozygous for the wild-type allele in frequency of the heat shock-induced nondisjunction and loss of sex chromosomes in meiosis. Because of this, the sbr ¹⁰ mutation can be assigned to the gain-of-function alleles (those gaining the dominance function). Expression of the mutant sbr ¹⁰ allele against the background of the wild-type allele suggests that in the heat shock-exposed females, the heat-modified product of this ts allele has an active effect on sex chromosome disjunction in meiosis.     

Cis-Acting Determinants Affecting Centromere Function, Sister-Chromatid Cohesion and Reciprocal Recombination during Meiosis in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

We have employed a system that utilizes homologous pairs of human DNA-derived yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs) as marker chromosomes to assess the specific role (s) of conserved centromere DNA elements (CDEI, CDEII and CDEIII) in meiotic chromosome disjunction fidelity. Thirteen different centromere (CEN) mutations were tested for their effects on meiotic centromere function. YACs containing a wild-type CEN DNA sequence segregate with high fidelity in meiosis I (99% normal segregation) and in meiosis II (96% normal segregation). YACs containing a 31-bp deletion mutation in centromere DNA element II (CDEIIδ31) in either a heterocentric (mutant/wild type), homocentric (mutant/mutant) or monosomic (mutant/--) YAC pair configuration exhibited high levels (16-28%) of precocious sister-chromatid segregation (PSS) and increased levels (1-6%) of nondisjunction meiosis I (NDI). YACs containing this mutation also exhibit high levels (21%) of meiosis II nondisjunction. Interestingly, significant alterations in homolog recombination frequency were observed in the exceptional PSS class of tetrads, suggesting unusual interactions between prematurely separated sister chromatids and their homologous nonsister chromatids. We also have assessed the meiotic segregation effects of rare gene conversion events occurring at sites located immediately adjacent to or distantly from the centromere region. Proximal gene conversion events were associated with extremely high levels (60%) of meiosis I segregation errors (including both PSS and NDI), whereas distal events had no apparent effect. Taken together, our results indicate a critical role for CDEII in meiosis and underscore the importance of maintaining sister-chromatid cohesion for proper recombination in meiotic prophase and for proper disjunction in meiosis I.     

Analysis of two 47,XXX males reveals X-Y interchange and maternal or paternal nondisjunction

Summary Two cases of 47,XXX males were studied, one of which has been published previously (Bigozzi et al. 1980). Analysis of X-linked restriction fragment length polymorphisms revealed that in this case, one X chromosome was of paternal and two were of maternal origin, whereas in the other case, two X chromosomes were of paternal and one of maternal origin. Southern blot analysis with Y-specific DNA probes demonstrated the presence of Y short arm sequences in both XXX males. In one case, the results obtained pointed to a paracentric inversion on Yp of the patient's father. In situ hybridization indicated that the Y-specific DNA sequences were localized on Xp22.3 in one of the three X chromosomes in both cases. The presence of Y DNA had no effect on random X inactivation. It is concluded that both XXX males originate from aberrant X-Y interchange during paternal meiosis, with coincident nondisjunction of the X chromosome during maternal meiosis in case 1, and during paternal meiosis II in case 2.     

The mechanism of secondary nondisjunction in Drosophila melanogaster females

Bridges (1916) observed that X chromosome nondisjunction was much more frequent in XXY females than it was in genetically normal XX females. In addition, virtually all cases of X nondisjunction in XXY females were due to XX <--> Y segregational events in oocytes in which the two X chromosomes had failed to undergo crossing over. He referred to these XX <--> Y segregation events as "secondary nondisjunction." Cooper (1948) proposed that secondary nondisjunction results from the formation of an X-Y-X trivalent, such that the Y chromosome directs the segregation of two achiasmate X chromosomes to opposite poles on the first meiotic spindle. Using in situ hybridization to X and YL chromosomal satellite sequences, we demonstrate that XX <--> Y segregations are indeed presaged by physical associations of the X and Y chromosomal heterochromatin. The physical colocalization of the three sex chromosomes is observed in virtually all oocytes in early prophase and maintained at high frequency until midprophase in all genotypes examined. Although these XXY associations are usually dissolved by late prophase in oocytes that undergo X chromosomal crossing over, they are maintained throughout prophase in oocytes with nonexchange X chromosomes. The persistence of such XXY associations in the absence of exchange presumably facilitates the segregation of the two X chromosomes and the Y chromosome to opposite poles on the developing meiotic spindle. Moreover, the observation that XXY pairings are dissolved at the end of pachytene in oocytes that do undergo X chromosomal crossing over demonstrates that exchanges can alter heterochromatic (and thus presumably centromeric) associations during meiotic prophase.     

A Cis-Acting Locus That Promotes Crossing over between X Chromosomes in Caenorhabditis Elegans

This study reports the characterization of a cis-acting locus on the Caenorhabditis elegans X chromosome that is crucial for promoting normal levels of crossing over specifically between the X homologs and for ensuring their proper disjunction at meiosis I. The function of this locus is disrupted by the mutation me8, which maps to the extreme left end of the X chromosome within the region previously implicated by studies of X;A translocations and X duplications to contain a meiotic pairing site. Hermaphrodites homozygous for a deletion of the locus (Df/Df) or heterozygous for a deletion and the me8 mutation (me8/Df) exhibit extremely high levels of X chromosome nondisjunction at the reductional division; this is correlated with a sharp decrease in crossing over between the X homologs as evidenced both by reductions in genetic map distances and by the presence of achiasmate chromosomes in cytological preparations of oocyte nuclei. Duplications of the wild-type region that are unlinked to the X chromosome cannot complement the recombination and disjunction defects in trans, indicating that this region must be present in cis to the X chromosome to ensure normal levels of crossing over and proper homolog disjunction. me8 homozygotes exhibit an altered distribution of crossovers along the X chromosome that suggests a defect in processivity along the X chromosome of an event that initiates at the chromosome end. Models are discussed in which the cis-acting locus deleted by the Dfs functions as a meiotic pairing center that recruits trans-acting factors onto the chromosomes to nucleate assembly of a crossover-competent complex between the X homologs. This pairing center might function in the process of homolog recognition, or in the initiation of homologous synapsis.     

The parental origin of the extra X chromosome in 47,XXX females.

We used X-linked DNA polymorphisms to study the parental origin of X chromosome nondisjunction in 28 47,XXX live-born females. Errors in oogenesis accounted for 26 of the cases, with the majority of these being attributable to an error at meiosis I. We observed an association between advanced parental age and meiosis I nondisjunction--but not meiosis II nondisjunction--in the maternally derived cases. In studies of recombination we found little evidence for an association between pairing failure and X chromosome nondisjunction, but our results suggest that increased recombination near the centromere may play a role in the etiology of the 47,XXX condition.     

A fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of X chromosome pairing in early human female meiosis

Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) utilizing an X chromosome whole library probe was used directly to assess the rate of aneuploidy and pairing behavior of the X chromosome in human female meiosis. Over 3000 meiotic cells obtained from fetal ovaries (gestational age 13–22 weeks) were scored for meiotic stage and evaluated for pairing abnormalities. No pairing anomalies were observed in 832 pachytenes. Twenty-two percent (88/398) of cells in zygotene were partially paired, but nonhomologous pairings could not be identified. One aneuploid preleptotene oocyte, presumably from mitotic nondisjunction was detected. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of FISH utilizing whole chromosome probes to evaluate the pairing behavior of chromosomes in human female meiosis. The application of this technique to study the relationship between nondisjunction and chromosome pairing behavior in maternal-age-related aneuploidy is discussed.     

Meiosis in Male DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER I. Isolation and Characterization of Meiotic Mutants Affecting Second Chromosome Disjunction

Two second chromosome, EMS-induced, meiotic mutants which cause an increase in second chromosome nondisjunction are described. The first mutant is recessive and causes an increase in second chromosome nondisjunction in both males and females. It causes no increase in nondisjunction of the sex chromosomes in either sex, nor of the third chromosome in females. No haplo-4-progeny were recovered from either sex. Thus, it appears that this mutant, which is localized to the second chromosome, affects only second chromosome disjunction and acts in both sexes.-The other mutant affects chromosome disjunction in males and has no effect in females. Nondisjunction occurs at the first meiotic division. Sex chromosome disjunction in the presence of this mutant is similar to that of sc(4)sc(8), with an excess of X and nullo-XY sperm relative to Y and XY sperm. In some lines, there is an excess of nullo-2 sperm relative to diplo-2 sperm, which appears to be regulated, in part, by the Y chromosome. A normal Y chromosome causes an increase in nullo-2 sperm, where B(s)Y does not. There is also a high correlation between second and sex chromosome nondisjunction. Nearly half of the second chromosome exceptions are also nondisjunctional for the sex chromosomes. Among the double exceptions, there is an excess of XY nullo-2 and nullo-XY diplo-2 gametes. Meiotic drive, chromosome loss and nonhomologous pairing are considered as possible explanations for the double exceptions.     

Meiotic mutations from natural populations ofDrosophila melanogaster

Two meiotic genes from natural populations are described. A female meiotic mutation,mei(1)g13, mapped to 17.4 on the X chromosome, causes nondisjunction of all homologs except for the fourth chromosomes. In addition, it reduces recombination by 10% in the homozygotes and causes 18% increased recombination in the heterozygotes. A male meiotic mutation,mei-1223 ^m144 , is located on the third chromosome. Although this mutation causes nondisjunction of all chromosomes, each chromosome pair exhibits a different nondisjunction frequency. Large variations in the sizes of the premature sperm heads observed in the homozygotes may reflect irregular meiotic pairing and the subsequent abnormal segregation, resulting in aneuploid chromosome complements.