Kinship alters the effects of forced cohabitation on body weight,mate choice and fitness in the rat-like hamster Tscheskia triton

It has been documented that social isolation imparts deleterious effects on gregarious rodents species,but caging in group imparts such effects on solitary rodents. This study was attempted at examining how kinship to affect body weight,behavioral interaction,mate choice and fitness when we caged male and female rat-like hamsters Tscheskia triton in pair,a solitary species. We found that females paired with nonsibling males became heavier than the females paired with sibling males,but both agonistic and amicable behavior between paired males and females did not differ between sibling and nonsibling groups. This indicated that kinship might reduce females' obesity in response to forced cohabitation,and dissociation might exist between physiological and behavioral responses. Furthermore,binary choice tests revealed that social familiarity between either siblings or nonsiblings decreased their investigating time spent in opposite sex conspecific of cage mates and/or their scents as compared with those of nonmates,suggesting effects of social association on mate and kin selection of the hamsters. On the other side,both females and males caged in pair with siblings show a preference between unfamiliar siblings or their scents and the counterparts of nonsiblings after two month separation,indicating that the kin recognition of the hamsters might also rely on phenotype matching. In addition,cohabitation (or permanent presence of fathers) elicited a lower survival of pups in nonsibling pairs than sibling pairs,but did not affect litter size,suggesting that kinship affects fitness when housing male and female ratlike hamsters together. Therefore,inbreeding might be adapted for rare and endangered animals.     

Effect of kinship on social behaviors in Brandt's voles (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Microtus brandti</Emphasis>)

The roles of kinship in agonistic behavior and mate choice were evaluated in Brandt's voles (Microtus brandti). In chambers bedded with familiar or unfamiliar substrates, the aggressive behavior and social investigation towards adult unfamiliar same-sex siblings and non-siblings were examined, and no significant kin bias was found. Males sniffed and followed unfamiliar unrelated females significantly more than unfamiliar sibling sisters, but males did not show significant preferences in copulatory behavior and agonistic behavior. Females spent significantly more time copulating with unfamiliar unrelated males than with their unfamiliar sibling brothers, while they did not show a significant preference in social investigation between them. Our study shows that kinship might play a role in the inbreeding avoidance based on preweaning familiarity or/and phenotype matching, but the role of kinship in agonistic behavior remains unclear.     

Interplay between various aspects in social relationships of young rhesus monkeys: Dominance,agonistic help,and affiliation

Relationships between group-living primates depend strongly on their position in the group dominance hierarchy and on their relationships with other group members. The influence of various behaviours on social relationships of immature rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) was investigated here. Dominance ranks were established and related to the degree of affiliation in a dyad. Older monkeys were mostly dominant to the younger ones, regardless of kinship. Subordinate monkeys left proximity of their dominant members more often than they were left by them both among siblings and non-siblings, but the effect of dominance rank on the amount of play initiation and grooming in a dyad differed between these two types of dyads. The amount of agonistic help two individuals provided for each other was low among immatures. Nevertheless, pairs of siblings gave help to each other in agonistic conflicts more often than non-siblings, and such help was more often reciprocated between siblings than between non-siblings. Help in agonistic conflicts was positively correlated with the amount of time monkeys spent playing, grooming, or in proximity. Adults tended to interfere less in conflicts of frequent sibling play partners or non-sibling grooming partners. No evidence was found for young monkeys to exchange reciprocally grooming for agonistic help. It is argued that the time monkeys spend interacting with each other in affiliative interactions increases their familiarity and thus promotes close relationships between them. On the whole, young monkeys' relationships, like those between adults, are influenced strongly by their kinship, and position in the dominance hierarchy.     

Structure and Sentiment in Serbian Cousinship

Analysis of survey and interview data from modern Belgrade shows an interplay between the structural alignments of traditional Serbian kinship and the more individual considerations of affective relationships between parents and their siblings. Cousin relationships are a perpetuation of parental sibling relationships but are markedly affected by structural factors. "Liking" appears to be a matter of loyalty, trust, and obligation and is strongest along agnatic lines; the greatest continuity of positive affect is between the close fraternal relationships in the parental generation and the close relationship between mutual father's brother's sons. The virifocality of the system is shown for other facets of kinship including possible warping of genealogical perception and recall.     

Spatial proximity among adult siblings in greylag geese (Anser anser): evidence for female bonding?

By staying close to allies, individuals may enjoy benefits through social support. In the socially monogamous greylag goose (Anser anser), pair-partners, parents, and even human foster parents may provide social support, facilitating access to resources or reducing agonistic pressure. In the present work, we analysed the spatial distribution of individuals within a semi-feral flock of 120 greylag geese, which contained 23 adult sibling groups of 2–4 individuals from 2 to 12 years old. During resting periods we scored dyadic distances between 28 focal individuals of different social categories, their siblings and unrelated control individuals of the same age. Adult female siblings (i.e. those hatched in the same year and raised together) rested significantly closer to each other than to either their brothers or unrelated control individuals. We attribute this to social attraction rather than to just a common preference for the same resting site. Thus, kinship bonds as expressed by cohesion might persist into adulthood, at least in the females. We discuss the potential benefits of proximity between related individuals with regard to reduced social stress via social support. Received: 21 February 2000 / Received in revised form: 16 May 2000 / Accepted: 17 May 2000     

The importance of kinship and familiarity in social interactions between mice

We investigated a range of social interactions between mice which differed in their degree of relatedness and familiarity. Unfamiliar half siblings (sharing paternity only) differed significantly from unfamiliar non-siblings (sharing neither mother nor father) in their tendency to perform aggression-related interactions and in the amount of passive body contact they showed. Differences between half and full siblings in patterns of interaction appeared to be due to differing degrees of familiarity with companions. Kinship effects disappeared completely when animals were allowed to become familiar. We discuss the functional significance of the familiarity and kinship effects we found, including differences between the sexes in the types of interaction showing kinship effects. Differences between adult and juvenile mice are also briefly discussed.     

Factor of familiarity in sibling recognition in golden hamsters

Male hamsters, reared with their siblings and non-siblings, were tested for their exploratory behavior of conspecific in the 4th and 8th week after their birth. During the tests, a familiar sibling, an unfamiliar sibling, a familiar non-sibling and an unfamiliar non-siblings was presented in a choice box. Subjective distance among these testing animals was measured using the caseV of Thurston's paired-comparison test. The hamsters spent more time with the unfamiliar animals than with the familiar ones. Although biological relation (sibling or non-sibling) had a significant effect in the 4th-week test, only the familiarity determined the investigatory behavior in the 8th-week test. These results suggest sibling recognition based on learning in hamsters.     

Sibling Recognition in Bank Swallows (Riparia riparia)

Observations of the behavior of newly-fledged bank swallows suggest that sibling recognition may be a mechanism promoting location of the home burrow in their large, dense colonies and of cohesion of family groups following departure from the burrow. We tested for sibling recognition in the field by comparing the antiphonal response of sibling groups to the recorded calls of own vs. unrelated sibling groups. Birds responded more to the calls of their own groups. In a laboratory experiment we raised chicks in isolation from 8–10 to 20 days of age and exposed them to a call of an unrelated chick. When tested in a choice situation at 15–20 days, chicks approached the familiar call in preference to a different call which they had not previously heard. We suggest that sibling recognition is based on familiarity, i.e., that it requires a period in which the calls of siblings are learned.     

Whom do the sparrows follow? The effect of kinship on social preference in house sparrow flocks

Non-aggressive social interactions between group-mates, e.g. maintenance of spatial proximity or activity synchrony are basic elements of a species’ social structure, and were found to be associated with important fitness consequences in group-living animals. In the establishment of such affiliative relationships, kinship has often been identified as one of the key predictors, but this has rarely been studied in simple social groups such as flocks of gregarious birds. In this study we investigated whether kinship affects social preference, as measured by the tendency to associate with others during various social activities, in captive house sparrow (Passer domesticus) flocks where birds could interact with differently related flock-mates. We found that preference between flock-mates was correlated with familiarity from early nestling period: same-brood siblings followed their sib initiating new activities more often than non-sib birds. The strength of association between birds also tended to correlate with genetic relatedness, but this was mainly due to the effect of siblings’ affiliation. Thus we concluded that house sparrows prefer the company of their siblings during social activities even well after fledging, which may facilitate kin-biased behaviours.     

Rethinking the Taiwanese minor marriage data: evidence the mind uses multiple kinship cues to regulate inbreeding avoidance

Natural experiments such as the Israeli Kibbutzim and Taiwanese minor marriages provide unique opportunities for testing the effects of childhood association on adult sexual attraction. Within these populations, early childhood association leads to the development of a sexual aversion, an effect first proposed by Edward Westermarck. However, recent analysis of Taiwanese minor marriages indicates that only the age at first association (an inverse index of childhood association) of the younger partner predicts marital fertility rates; the age at first association of the older partner does not. Although considered a puzzle, a recent model of human inbreeding avoidance can explain this pattern. This model suggests that the mind uses at least two kinship cues to regulate the development of sibling sexual aversions: (i) childhood coresidence duration, a default cue used mainly by younger siblings in detecting probable older siblings, and (ii) exposure to one's mother caring for a newborn, a cue only available to older siblings and reliable regardless of coresidence duration and, hence, age at first association. Thus, one reason that the age at first association of only the younger partner in minor marriages predicts fertility is that coresidence duration serves as a cue to siblingship mainly for younger partners; older partners use a different kinship cue not influenced by durations of association. When compared to data from psychological investigations of the effects of coresidence duration on opposition to sibling incest, the minor marriage data reveal an identical pattern providing converging lines of evidence that multiple kinship cues mediate sibling detection and inbreeding avoidance in humans.     

‘O sibling,where art thou?’‐ a review of avian sibling recognition with respect to the mammalian literature

Avian literature on sibling recognition is rare compared to that developed by mammalian researchers. We compare avian and mammalian research on sibling recognition to identify why avian work is rare, how approaches differ and what avian and mammalian researchers can learn from each other. Three factors: (1) biological differences between birds and mammals, (2) conceptual biases and (3) practical constraints, appear to influence our current understanding. Avian research focuses on colonial species because sibling recognition is considered adaptive where 'mixing potential' of dependent young is high; research on a wider range of species, breeding systems and ecological conditions is now needed. Studies of acoustic recognition cues dominate avian literature; other types of cues (e.g. visual, olfactory) deserve further attention. The effect of gender on avian sibling recognition has yet to be investigated; mammalian work shows that gender can have important influences. Most importantly, many researchers assume that birds recognise siblings through 'direct familiarisation' (commonly known as associative learning or familiarity); future experiments should also incorporate tests for 'indirect familiarisation' (commonly known as phenotype matching). If direct familiarisation proves crucial, avian research should investigate how periods of separation influence sibling discrimination. Mammalian researchers typically interpret sibling recognition in broad functional terms (nepotism, optimal outbreeding); some avian researchers more successfully identify specific and testable adaptive explanations, with greater relevance to natural contexts. We end by reporting exciting discoveries from recent studies of avian sibling recognition that inspire further interest in this topic.     

Beiträge zur: Anthropologie,ethnographie und sprachforschung der kashuiéna indianer sowie akkulturationserscheinungen

Studies of Dravidian kinship have neglected the importance of the cross‐sibling relationship. A comparative analysis of data gathered in a Sri Lankan Muslim community shows: (1) normative depictions of cross‐sibling relationships do not reflect or explain actual behavior patterns; and (2) variation in post‐marital cross‐sibling relationships is largely accounted for by the presence or absence and use of the dowry. The overarching purpose is to show that any comprehensive analysis of the Dravidian kinship system must include an analysis of cross‐sibling relationships and dowry practices.     

Sexually dimorphic transitions revealed in the relationships of yearling rhesus monkeys following the birth of siblings

We report here that in a large captive group of monkeys, Macaca mulatta,sudden sex-related changes occur in social interactions in one short phase of an infant’s development. Social interactions of 1-year-old animals (males, N =12; females, N =8) 6 weeks before the birth of siblings were compared with interactions occurring 6 weeks after the birth. On the day of the siblings’ birth, depression-like postures were seen in two yearling males (YMs); 10 YMs showed hyperactivity. In the postbirth period, YMs refocused their attentions away from their mother and toward other, often unrelated members of the group. Although YMs initiated disengagement of interactions with their mothers, there was evidence that mothers attempted to lessen this disengagement. The YMs had close relationships with specific (“preferred”) male individuals. These relationships (particularly those with adult males) became more pronounced following the birth of the sibling. The adult-male group also took an active role in maintaining interactions with YMs. The preferred partners in the YM-other male relationship before the birth of the sibling were, however, not always the same as those in the period after the birth. Dominance relationships and probably genetic factors determined patterns of interaction between YMs and their preferred male partners. Among yearling females (YFs), no dramatic changes in interactions with their mothers or with other group members were detected after their mothers gave birth. Relationships in YF-mother and YF-other-individual pairs (especially when the other individual was kin) seemed to be consolidated during the postbirth interval. There was little evidence of jealousy between the YFs and their younger siblings. Thus, sibling birth acted as a stimulus for the occurrence of sexually dimorphic interactions in yearlings. We suggest that in natural environments, social interactions in YFs promote relationships that will serve to integrate them into the matrilineal social structure, whereas comparable behavior in YMs encourages relationships with males that they may emigrate with into, or meet again in, nonnatal troops.     

Socialization in spectacled parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus): how juveniles compensate for the lack of siblings

  Socialization, that is, the process of the integration of an individual into the social system and the acquisition of basic social traits, has been studied in a variety of vertebrate species. Deprivation experiments have shown that the lack of early affiliative relationships has negative long-term effects on social behaviour and reproduction. Most studies emphasized the importance of the mother-infant relationship. However, it soon became evident that peer relationships to like-aged conspecifics, such as siblings and unrelated juveniles of nearly the same age, are also important for socialization. Whether individuals, deprived of one of these important social components, are able to compensate for this lack is not known. Here I tested the hypothesis that in spectacled parrotlets (Forpus conspicillatus), singletons (i.e., those that grew up without siblings) were able to compensate for this social lack by establishing and strengthening other relationships. In spectacled parrotlets socialization depends on the formation of long-lasting sibling groups. However, singletons without nest mates are quite common (about 6%), both in captivity and in nature. In this study I analysed the affiliative interactions with other group members of five singletons in comparison to eight siblings, from fledging to the 36th week after fledging, within a group of adult and juvenile conspecifics. In contrast to siblings, the singletons prolonged the relationships with their parents. Then they established a ”host sibling group” with other like-aged individuals. All singletons became well integrated into the group and established exclusive pair bonds. It is concluded that juvenile singletons of spectacled parrotlets are able to compensate for the lack of siblings by the development of alternative socialization tactics. Received: 12 December 1998 / Received in revised form: 17 May 1999 / Accepted: 7 June 1999     

Sibling and neighbour recognition in wild juvenile muskrats

Sibling and neighbour recognition were examined using wild-caught juvenile muskrats, Ondatra zibethicus, of known sibship in dyadic encounters. Behavioural asymmetry between sibling and nonsibling dyads indicated the presence of sibling recognition. Recognition of neighbours was examined using indices of agonistic and amicable behaviour calculated using exclusively non-sibling dyads. The distance between captures within non-sibling dyads was used to approximate familiarity. Amicable behaviour decreased significantly with increasing distance between captures, and, therefore, with decreasing familiarity. Agonistic behaviour was not correlated with distance between captures.     

An investigation of sibling recognition in Rana cascadae tadpoles

Sibling recognition was studied experimentally in tadpoles of the Cascades frog, Rana cascadae. Sibships were divided into two groups at an early developmental stage. One group was reared with siblings and the second with a mixture of siblings and non-siblings. Whe given a choice of associating with a sibling or non-sibling group, individuals reared with siblings preferred siblings. One mixed-reared group spent more time associating with unfamiliar siblings than unfamiliar nonsiblings. Tadpoles of another mixed-reared group preferred to associate with pure siblings over a mixture of siblings and non-siblings with which they were reared. When the stimulus animals were taken exclusively from the mixed-rearing tank, two mixed-reared groups showed no sibling preferences. Our results suggest that early association with non-siblings does not affect sibling recognition in this species.     

Kin recognition in Rana cascadae tadpoles: maternal and paternal effects

Cascades frog (Rana cascadae) tadpoles preferentially associate with full siblings over half sibling and half siblings over non-siblings when reared with siblings or as isolates. These tadpoles can use cues of maternal or paternal origin in distinguishing siblings from non-siblings, but maternal cues are preferred over paternal cues. This suggests that a hierarchy of cue importance may exist. Our results are consistent with both a phenotypic matching and a genetic recognition system of kin recognition. Thus, both learned and innate components may play a role in R. cascadae sibling recognition. Kin recognition may facilitate preferential treatment of kin, such as cooperation in food finding or in warning against predators, and therefore those individuals behaving altruistically in kin groups can increase their inclusive fitness.     

Sibling association among schooling toad tadpoles: field evidence and implications

The results of recent laboratory studies suggest that the ability to recognize kin may be a widespread phenomenon among diverse animal groups, but the question of how such recognition abilities influence individuals' behaviour under natural conditions has not always been considered. As an assay for sibling recognition, I measured the sibship composition of experimental schools formed by tadpoles of the American toad (Bufo americanus) in their natural habitat. Sibling cohorts were obtained from amplectant pairs in the laboratory and reared in groups either (1) in separate tanks, apart from non-siblings; or (2) in a common tank, separated from non-siblings by a screen partition across which water could pass. Tadpoles were dye-marked to indicate sibship identity. Pairs of sibling groups were then mixed together in a bucket and released in natural outdoor ponds, where they formed schools. I found significant differences in sibship composition among schools in 79% of all sampling periods; overall, 64% of the schools sampled were significantly biased in favour of one or the other sibship. The formation of sibling schools appears to result from a behavioural recognition mechanism rather than from differential habitat selection. Tadpoles preferentially formed schools with familiar siblings over both familiar and unfamiliar non-siblings, suggesting that sibling discrimination is not based on familiarity alone. Although experience may affect the ontogeny of sibling recognition, sibling preferences are apparently formed early in development, perhaps prior to hatching. Grouped individuals may in some situations increase their inclusive fitness by associating with kin: aposematic advertisement, alarm signalling in response to predators' attacks, and kin-influenced growth regulation are suggested as three specific advantages conferred by the formation of sibling schools.     

Relatives growing together: pair density and kinship

Kin selection is often used to explain the evolution altruism towards relatives through favouring the evolution of kin recognition. However, it remains unclear whether kin recognition is affected by plant pair density and different degrees of relatedness. A two-factor experimental design of kinship (three kinship degrees including siblings, closely related strangers and distantly related strangers) and pair density (including relative small, medium and large pair densities) was conducted in this study. Plant competitive traits including rosette size, specific leaf area (SLA), stem elongation, root and leaf allocation, seed biomass and vegetative biomass were measured to reflect interactions among plants living with different relatives of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions [Columbia (Col-0), Landsberg erecta (Ler) and Wassileskijia (Ws)] in three different pair densities. The SLA only showed kinship effect, and siblings showed higher SLA than non-siblings in each pair density. The plant total biomass was only affected by pair density, which increased with decreases of pair density. The rosette size, stem elongation, root allocation and leaf allocation showed interactive effects of kinship and pair density. In the large pair density, the rosette size of siblings was lower than distantly related strangers, compared to closely related strangers; the stem elongation and root allocation were lower, while the seed biomass of siblings was higher than the closely or distantly related strangers. In the medium pair density, plants living with siblings or with closely related neighbours showed higher root allocation than with distantly related neighbours. In the small pair density, the plant rosette acted similarly to of which in the large pair density, and siblings showed higher root allocation than the two strangers. The other traits in each pair density showed no significant differences among kinship treatments. A relatively large pair density achieves kin recognition by deducing root competition ability and mutual shading, with increased efficient light capture and fitness. Similar such root and efficient light capture strategies were selected in medium pair density. Except the efficient light capture strategies, small pair density also displays allocation trade-offs between roots (decreased) and leaves (increased) for siblings. Moreover, kin responses on those attributes are also adjusted by kinship degree. Thus, kinships and pair density are important variables to mediate kin interactions.     

Kin detection cues and sibling relationship quality in adulthood: The role of childhood co-residence duration and maternal perinatal association

Cues facilitating kin detection among children have been suggested to have a profound impact on adult sibling relationships. Using a large and population-based data of younger and middle-aged Finns, we test how childhood co-residence duration and maternal perinatal association (MPA) correlate with contact frequency, emotional closeness and provision of help between adult siblings. Employing sibling fixed-effect regression models we show that duration of co-residence in childhood and MPA are indeed associated with better relationship quality in all three measures. Provided MPA, sibling relationship quality is high independently of co-residence length, but in the absence of MPA, increased co-residence duration is associated with better relationship quality. Co-residence duration is more strongly associated with provision of help between opposite-gender than same-gender sibling dyads. Full siblings report better relationship quality than half siblings do, although the co-residence duration mediates the effect of genetic relatedness in emotional closeness between full and maternal half siblings and in provision of help between full and paternal half siblings. Moreover, MPA serves as a mediator in the case of emotional closeness between full and maternal half siblings. Our results provide solid support for the importance of childhood kin detection cues for sibling relationship quality in adulthood, and how such cues interact with genetic relatedness and gender.