Dual action of isoprenols from herbal medicines on both PPARgamma and PPARalpha in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and HepG2 hepatocytes

Several herbal medicines improve hyperlipidemia, diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. However, the molecular mechanism underlying this improvement has not yet been clarified. In this study, we found that several isoprenols, common components of herbal plants, activate human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) as determined using the novel GAL4 ligand-binding domain chimera assay system with coactivator coexpression. Farnesol and geranylgeraniol that are typical isoprenols in herbs and fruits activated not only PPARgamma but also PPARalpha as determined using the chimera assay system. These compounds also activated full-length human PPARgamma and PPARalpha in CV1 cells. Moreover, these isoprenols upregulated the expression of some lipid metabolic target genes of PPARgamma and PPARalpha in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and HepG2 hepatocytes, respectively. These results suggest that herbal medicines containing isoprenols with dual action on both PPARgamma and PPARalpha can be of interest for the amelioration of lipid metabolic disorders associated with diabetes.     

A rapid, homogeneous, fluorescence polarization binding assay for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma using a fluorescein-tagged dual PPARalpha/gamma activator

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and other members of the nuclear hormone receptor family are important drug targets for the treatment of metabolic diseases. PPARalpha and PPARgamma play crucial roles in lipid and glucose metabolism, respectively. Therefore, screening methods that help to rapidly identify activators of these receptors should be of considerable value. A homogeneous fluorescence polarization (FP) ligand binding assay capable of rapidly identifying ligands that bind to both PPARalpha and PPARgamma has been developed using purified PPARalpha or PPARgamma ligand binding domains and a fluorescein-labeled analog (FLA) of a potent dual PPARalpha/gamma activator. FLA activator showed good binding affinity toward both PPARalpha (K(i)=0.7microM) and PPARgamma (K(i)=0.4microM). The binding of FLA activator was rapid and reached a plateau within 10 min. The resulting FP signal was stable for at least 18h. The FP binding assay performed robustly in a 384-well format, and the average Z' value was 0.77. There was a good correlation between the binding potency (IC(50) values) and rank order of binding potency for a panel of standard PPAR ligands obtained in FP binding assay and scintillation proximity assay or gel filtration binding assays using (3)H-labeled PPARalpha (r(2)=0.99) and PPARgamma (r(2)=0.99) ligands. There was also a good correlation of IC(50) values obtained by FP binding assay and scintillation proximity assay for the clinically used PPAR activators. Thus, the FP binding assay with a single fluorescein-labeled PPARalpha/gamma dual activator offers a homogeneous nonradioactive, sensitive, robust, and less expensive high-throughput assay for detecting compounds that bind to both PPARgamma and PPARalpha. Using this FP binding assay, we have identified a large number of PPARalpha/gamma dual activators. A similar assay platform may be easily adapted to other members of the nuclear hormone receptor family.     

PPAR家族及其与代谢综合征的关系

过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体(peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors,PPARs)是配体激活的转录因子核受体超家族成员之一。目前已知有三种亚型：PPARα、-β／δ和-γ。它们在脂肪生成、脂质代谢、胰岛素敏感性、炎症和血压调节中起着关键作用,因而近年来倍受关注。越来越多的研究表明,PPARs与代谢综合征,包括胰岛素抵抗、糖耐量受损、2型糖尿病、肥胖、高脂血症、高血压病、动脉粥样硬化和蛋白尿之间存在因果关系。重要的是,PPARα的激动剂如贝丁酸类降脂药(Fibrate)和PPARγ的激动剂如噻唑烷二酮(Thiazolidinedione,TZD)均已被证实有改善代谢综合征的作用。此外,三种PPAR亚型在2型糖尿病及糖尿病肾病的发展中均有重要作用。不断增加的证据提示,PPARs有可能成为代谢综合征及其相关并发症的潜在治疗靶点。本文将就PPARs的生物学活性、配体选择性和生理学功能作一综述,并对其在代谢综合征发病机制中的作用和PPAR配体对2型糖尿病的治疗效用进行重点讨论。     

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta agonist, GW501516, regulates the expression of genes involved in lipid catabolism and energy uncoupling in skeletal muscle cells

Lipid homeostasis is controlled by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARalpha, -beta/delta, and -gamma) that function as fatty acid-dependent DNA-binding proteins that regulate lipid metabolism. In vitro and in vivo genetic and pharmacological studies have demonstrated PPARalpha regulates lipid catabolism. In contrast, PPARgamma regulates the conflicting process of lipid storage. However, relatively little is known about PPARbeta/delta in the context of target tissues, target genes, lipid homeostasis, and functional overlap with PPARalpha and -gamma. PPARbeta/delta, a very low-density lipoprotein sensor, is abundantly expressed in skeletal muscle, a major mass peripheral tissue that accounts for approximately 40% of total body weight. Skeletal muscle is a metabolically active tissue, and a primary site of glucose metabolism, fatty acid oxidation, and cholesterol efflux. Consequently, it has a significant role in insulin sensitivity, the blood-lipid profile, and lipid homeostasis. Surprisingly, the role of PPARbeta/delta in skeletal muscle has not been investigated. We utilize selective PPARalpha, -beta/delta, -gamma, and liver X receptor agonists in skeletal muscle cells to understand the functional role of PPARbeta/delta, and the complementary and/or contrasting roles of PPARs in this major mass peripheral tissue. Activation of PPARbeta/delta by GW501516 in skeletal muscle cells induces the expression of genes involved in preferential lipid utilization, beta-oxidation, cholesterol efflux, and energy uncoupling. Furthermore, we show that treatment of muscle cells with GW501516 increases apolipoprotein-A1 specific efflux of intracellular cholesterol, thus identifying this tissue as an important target of PPARbeta/delta agonists. Interestingly, fenofibrate induces genes involved in fructose uptake, and glycogen formation. In contrast, rosiglitazone-mediated activation of PPARgamma induces gene expression associated with glucose uptake, fatty acid synthesis, and lipid storage. Furthermore, we show that the PPAR-dependent reporter in the muscle carnitine palmitoyl-transferase-1 promoter is directly regulated by PPARbeta/delta, and not PPARalpha in skeletal muscle cells in a PPARgamma coactivator-1-dependent manner. This study demonstrates that PPARs have distinct roles in skeletal muscle cells with respect to the regulation of lipid, carbohydrate, and energy homeostasis. Moreover, we surmise that PPARbeta/delta agonists would increase fatty acid catabolism, cholesterol efflux, and energy expenditure in muscle, and speculate selective activators of PPARbeta/delta may have therapeutic utility in the treatment of hyperlipidemia, atherosclerosis, and obesity.     

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and skin development

PPARs are nuclear hormone receptors. PPAR subtypes (alpha, gamma, delta, the latter a xPPARbeta homologue) were initially investigated in skin because of their known role in regulating lipid metabolism. Studies adding specific PPAR ligand activators to cultured skin or skin cells are compatible with the concepts that PPARalpha activation mediates early lipogenic steps common to the function of both skin epidermal cells (keratinocytes) and sebaceous cells (sebocytes), PPARgamma activation plays a unique role in stimulating sebocyte lipogenesis, and PPARdelta activation may contribute to lipid biosynthesis in both sebocytes and keratinocytes under certain circumstances. Epidermal keratinocytes appear to express small amounts of PPARalpha and PPARdelta mRNA and a trace of PPARgamma mRNA which is up-regulated with differentiation. Sebocytes express all subtypes; PPARgamma gene expression excedes that in epidermis. The emerging data on PPAR protein expression suggests that epidermis normally expresses predominantly PPARalpha, while sebocytes express more PPARgamma than PPARalpha. These expression patterns may change during hyperplasia, differentiation and inflammation. Gene disruption studies in mice are compatible with a contribution of PPARalpha to skin barrier function, suggest that PPARgamma is necessary for sebocyte differentiation, and indicate that PPARdelta can ameliorate inflammatory responses in skin. PPARs appear to play a role in keratinocyte synthesis of the lipids that they export to the intercellular space to form the skin permeability barrier. They also appear to be important for sebocyte formation of the intracellular fused lipid droplets that constitute the holocrine secretion of the sebaceous gland. In addition, they may play roles in keratinocyte growth and differentiation and the inhibition of skin inflammation by diverse mechanisms not necessarily related to fat metabolism.     

Safety issues and prospects for future generations of PPAR modulators

Because of their wide range of actions on glucose homeostasis, lipid metabolism and vascular inflammation, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are promising targets for the development of new drugs for the treatment of metabolic disorders such as diabetes, dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis. In clinical practice, PPARalpha agonists, such as the already available fibrates, improve dyslipidemia, while PPARgamma agonists, such as thiazolidinediones, improve insulin resistance and diabetes. The complementary action of simultaneous activation of each PPAR in patients suffering from metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes has led to new pharmacological strategies focused on the development of agonists targeting more than one receptor such as the dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists. However, despite the proven benefits of targeting PPARs, safety concerns have recently led to late stage development failures of various PPAR agonists including novel specific PPARgamma agonists and dual PPARalpha/gamma agonists. These safety concerns include potential carcinogenicity in rodents, signs of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis, increase in plasma creatinine and homocysteine, weight gain, fluid retention, peripheral edema and potential increased risk of cardiac failure. Although the discontinued compounds shared common side effects, the reason for discontinuation was always compound specific and the toxicological or adverse effects which have motivated the discontinuation could be either due to the activation of PPARgamma, PPARalpha or both (class effect) or due to a PPAR unrelated effect. Thus, the risk evaluation of each adverse effect should be viewed on a case by case basis considering both the PPAR profile of the drug, its absorption/distribution profile, the nature of the side effect and the putative PPAR-related mechanism of action. This review mainly focuses on the preclinical and clinical adverse events of PPAR agonists that could be of concern when considering the development of new PPAR agonists. The selective modulation of PPAR activities is a promising approach to develop new drugs with preserved efficacy but diminished adverse effects.     

Protein expression changes in the Sprague Dawley rat liver proteome following administration of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha and gamma ligands

Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily and are intimately involved in lipid metabolism and energy homeostasis. Activation of these receptors in rodents can lead to hepatomegaly and ultimately hepatic carcinogenesis although the mechanisms by which these processes occur are poorly understood. To further our understanding of these processes and to discriminate between different PPAR mediated signalling pathways, a proteomic approach has been undertaken to identify changes in protein expression patterns in Sprague Dawley rat liver following dosing with a PPARalpha agonist (Wyeth 14643), a PPARgamma agonist (Troglitazone) and a compound with mixed PPARalpha/gamma agonist activity (SB-219994). Using one-and-two-dimensional electrophoresis of tissue lysates a diverse range of protein abundance changes was observed in these tissues. Whilst a number of these proteins have PPAR response elements (PPREs) in their respective promoters, another group was detected whose expression has been documented to be sensitive to peroxisome proliferator administration. Most notably within these groups, proteins involved in lipid catabolism displayed increased expression following drug administration. A further subset of proteins, with less obvious biological implications, also showed altered expression patterns. Where available, sequences upstream of the coding regions of genes not previously known to have PPREs were searched with positional consensus matrices for the presence of PPREs in an attempt to validate these changes. Using such an approach putative PPARgamma and PPARdelta response elements were discovered upstream of the tubulin beta coding region. There was limited overlap in observed protein abundance changes between the three groups, and where this was the case (cytosolic epoxide hydrolase, peroxisomal bifunctional enzyme, hydroxymethyl glutaryl CoA, synthase, long chain acyl-CoA thioesterase), expression of these proteins had previously been shown to be under the control of PPAR activity.