A bipolar personality of yeast prion proteins

Prions are infectious, self-propagating protein conformations. [PSI⁺], [RNQ⁺] and [URE3] are well characterized prions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and represent the aggregated states of the translation termination factor Sup35, a functionally unknown protein Rnq1, and a regulator of nitrogen metabolism Ure2, respectively. Overproduction of Sup35 induces the de novo appearance of the [PSI⁺] prion in [RNQ⁺] or [URE3] strain, but not in non-prion strain. However, [RNQ⁺] and [URE3] prions themselves, as well as overexpression of a mutant Rnq1 protein, Rnq1Δ100, and Lsm4, hamper the maintenance of [PSI⁺]. These findings point to a bipolar activity of [RNQ⁺], [URE3], Rnq1Δ100, and Lsm4, and probably other yeast prion proteins as well, for the fate of [PSI⁺] prion. Possible mechanisms underlying the apparent bipolar activity of yeast prions will be discussed.     

Phenotypic expression of epigenetic determinant [ISP +] in Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on the combination of sup35 and sup45 mutations

Translation fidelity in Saccharomyces yeasts is determined by genetic and epigenetic (prion) factors. A study was made of S. cerevisiae strains containing the nonchromosomal determinant [ISP ⁺], described earlier. Some of its properties suggest that [ISP ⁺] is a prion. [ISP ⁺] is expressed phenotypically as an antisuppressor of two sup35 mutations and can be cured with guanidine chloride (GuHCl). It was shown that sup35 mutants containing [ISP ⁺] carried additional sup45 mutations. These mutations caused amino acid substitutions in different regions of translation termination factor eRF1, encoded by SUP45. Strains bearing the sup35-25 mutation contained the sup45 mutation that caused amino acid substitution at position 400 of eRF1; strains bearing sup35-10 contained the mutation that altered eRF1 at position 75. Thus, the antisuppressor phenotype of the [ISP ⁺] strains proved to depend on the interaction of sup35 and sup45 mutations, as well as on the GuHCl-curable epigenetic determinant. Published in Russian in Molekulyarnaya Biologiya, 2006, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 844–849. The article was translated by the authors.     

Prion-Dependent Lethality of sup45 Mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae translation termination factors eRF1 (Sup45) and eRF3 (Sup35) are encoded by the essential genes SUP45 and SUP35 respectively. Heritable aggregation of Sup35 results in formation of the yeast prion [PSI⁺]. It is known that combination of [PSI⁺] with some mutant alleles of the SUP35 or SUP45 genes in one and the same haploid yeast cell causes synthetic lethality. In this study, we perform detailed analysis of synthetic lethality between various sup45 nonsense and missense mutations on one hand, and different variants of [PSI⁺] on the other hand. Synthetic lethality with sup45 mutations was detected for [PSI⁺] variants of different stringencies. Moreover, we demonstrate for the first time that in some combinations, synthetic lethality is dominant and occurs at the postzygotic stage after only a few cell divisions. The tRNA suppressor SUQ5 counteracts the prion-dependent lethality of the nonsense alleles but not of the missense alleles of SUP45, indicating that the lethal effect is due to the depletion of Sup45. Synthetic lethality is also suppressed in the presence of the C-proximal fragment of Sup35 (Sup35C) that lacks the prion domain and cannot be included into the prion aggregates. Remarkably, the production of Sup35C in a sup45 mutant strain is also accompanied by an increase in the Sup45 levels, suggesting that translationally active Sup35 up-regulates Sup45 or protects it from degradation.Key Words: Sup45, Sup35, eRF1, eRF3, amyloid, [PSI⁺], translation termination, Saccharomyces cerevisiae     

Effect of Charged Residues in the N-domain of Sup35 Protein on Prion [PSI+] Stability and Propagation

Recent studies have shown that Sup35p prion fibrils probably have a parallel in-register β-structure. However, the part(s) of the N-domain critical for fibril formation and maintenance of the [PSI⁺] phenotype remains unclear. Here we designed a set of five SUP35 mutant alleles (sup35^KK) with lysine substitutions in each of five N-domain repeats, and investigated their effect on infectivity and ability of corresponding proteins to aggregate and coaggregate with wild type Sup35p in the [PSI⁺] strain. Alleles sup35-M1 (Y46K/Q47K) and sup35-M2 (Q61K/Q62K) led to prion loss, whereas sup35-M3 (Q70K/Q71K), sup35-M4 (Q80K/Q81K), and sup35-M5 (Q89K/Q90K) were able to maintain the [PSI⁺] prion. This suggests that the critical part of the parallel in-register β-structure for the studied [PSI⁺] prion variant lies in the first 63–69 residues. Our study also reveals an unexpected interplay between the wild type Sup35p and proteins expressed from the sup35^KK alleles during prionization. Both Sup35-M1p and Sup35-M2p coaggregated with Sup35p, but only sup35-M2 led to prion loss in a dominant manner. We suggest that in the fibrils, Sup35p can bind to Sup35-M1p in the same conformation, whereas Sup35-M2p only allowed the Sup35p conformation that leads to the non-heritable fold. Mutations sup35-M4 and sup35-M5 influence the structure of the prion forming region to a lesser extent, and can lead to the formation of new prion variants.     

Haploid yeast cells undergo a reversible phenotypic switch associated with chromosome II copy number

Background

SUP35 and SUP45 are essential genes encoding polypeptide chain release factors. However, mutants for these genes may be viable but display pleiotropic phenotypes which include, but are not limited to, nonsense suppressor phenotype due to translation termination defect. [PSI ⁺] prion formation is another Sup35p-associated mechanism leading to nonsense suppression through decreased availability of functional Sup35p. [PSI ⁺] differs from genuine sup35 mutations by the possibility of its elimination and subsequent re-induction. Some suppressor sup35 mutants had also been shown to undergo a reversible phenotypic switch in the opposite direction. This reversible switching had been attributed to a prion termed [ISP ⁺]. However, even though many phenotypic and molecular level features of [ISP ⁺] were revealed, the mechanism behind this phenomenon has not been clearly explained and might be more complex than suggested initially.

Results

Here we took a genomic approach to look into the molecular basis of the difference between the suppressor (Isp^?) and non-suppressor (Isp⁺) phenotypes. We report that the reason for the difference between the Isp⁺ and the Isp^? phenotypes is chromosome II copy number changes and support our finding with showing that these changes are indeed reversible by reproducing the phenotypic switch and tracking karyotypic changes. Finally, we suggest mechanisms that mediate elevation in nonsense suppression efficiency upon amplification of chromosome II and facilitate switching between these states.

Conclusions

(i) In our experimental system, amplification of chromosome II confers nonsense suppressor phenotype and guanidine hydrochloride resistance at the cost of overall decreased viability in rich medium. (ii) SFP1 might represent a novel regulator of chromosome stability, as SFP1 overexpression elevates frequency of the additional chromosome loss in our system. (iii) Prolonged treatment with guanidine hydrochloride leads to selection of resistant isolates, some of which are disomic for chromosome II.

     

Growth phase‐dependent changes in the size and infectivity of SDS‐resistant Sup35p assemblies associated with the [PSI+] prion in yeast

The translation termination factor Sup35p can form self‐replicating fibrillar aggregates responsible for the [PSI⁺] prion state. Sup35p aggregation yields detergent‐resistant assemblies detectable on agarose gels under semi‐denaturant conditions and fluorescent puncta within the yeast cytosol when the protein is fused to GFP. It is still unclear whether any of these manifestations of [PSI⁺] truly correspond to the Sup35p assemblies that faithfully transmit the [PSI⁺] prion from mother to daughter cells. The infectious titer of prions in cells can be indirectly assessed by the ability of [PSI⁺] cells lysates to induce the prion state when introduced into naïve cells. Here, we report that the dramatic changes in the size and amounts of SDS‐resistant Sup35p that occur during growth do not correlate with the infectious titer. Our results suggest that fluorescent Sup35‐GFP puncta and detergent‐resistant Sup35p assemblies are good indicators of Sup35p conversion to the prion state but not of infectious particles number.     

Over‐expression of the molecular chaperone Hsp104 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in the malpartition of [PSI+] propagons

The ability of a yeast cell to propagate [PSI⁺], the prion form of the Sup35 protein, is dependent on the molecular chaperone Hsp104. Inhibition of Hsp104 function in yeast cells leads to a failure to generate new propagons, the molecular entities necessary for [PSI⁺] propagation in dividing cells and they get diluted out as cells multiply. Over‐expression of Hsp104 also leads to [PSI⁺] prion loss and this has been assumed to arise from the complete disaggregation of the Sup35 prion polymers. However, in conditions of Hsp104 over‐expression in [PSI⁺] cells we find no release of monomers from Sup35 polymers, no monomerization of aggregated Sup35 which is not accounted for by the proportion of prion‐free [psi^‐] cells present, no change in the molecular weight of Sup35‐containing SDS‐resistant polymers and no significant decrease in average propagon numbers in the population as a whole. Furthermore, they show that over‐expression of Hsp104 does not interfere with the incorporation of newly synthesised Sup35 into polymers, nor with the multiplication of propagons following their depletion in numbers while growing in the presence of guanidine hydrochloride. Rather, they present evidence that over‐expression of Hsp104 causes malpartition of [PSI⁺] propagons between mother and daughter cells in a sub‐population of cells during cell division thereby generating prion‐free [psi^?] cells.     

The sensitive [SWI+] prion

Yeast prions are heritable protein-based genetic elements which rely on molecular chaperone proteins for stable transmission to cell progeny. Within the past few years, five new prions have been validated and 18 additional putative prions identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The exploration of the physical and biological properties of these “nouveau prions” has begun to reveal the extent of prion diversity in yeast. We recently reported that one such prion, [SWI⁺], differs from the best studied, archetypal prion [PSI⁺] in several significant ways.¹ Notably, [SWI⁺] is highly sensitive to alterations in Hsp70 system chaperone activity and is lost upon growth at elevated temperatures. In that report we briefly noted a correlation amongst prions regarding amino acid composition, seed number and sensitivity to the activity of the Hsp70 chaperone system. Here we extend that analysis and put forth the idea that [SWI⁺] may be representative of a class of asparagine-rich yeast prions which also includes [URE3], [MOT3⁺] and [ISP⁺], distinct from the glutamine-rich prions such as [PSI⁺] and [RNQ⁺]. While much work remains, it is apparent that our understanding of the extent of the diversity of prion characteristics is in its infancy.     

Modification of [PSI +] prion properties by combining amino acid changes in N-terminal domain of Sup35 protein

The prion [PSI ⁺] is an amyloid isoform of the release factor eRF3 encoded by the SUP35 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast. Naturally occurring amyloid complexes have been studied for a long time, yet their structural organization is still not well understood. The formation of amyloid forms of the wild-type Sup35 protein (Sup35p) is directed by its N-terminal portion, which forms a superpleated β-sheet structure. We previously constructed five mutants, each of which carried a replacement in two consecutive amino acids, one in each of the oligopeptide repeats (OR) and in the Sup35p N-terminal region. Mutations sup35-M1 (YQ46-47KK) and sup35-M2 (QQ61-62KK) lead to the compete loss of prion conformation. Three other mutants, i.e., sup35-M3 (QQ70-71KK), sup35-M4 (QQ80-81KK), and sup35-M5 (QQ89-90KK), formed functional prions. In the current study, we investigated the contribution of each mutant peptide to the stability of the prion and aggregation properties, and compared the effects of single mutants and combinations of different mutant alleles. Studies were carried out in yeast strains designed to carry single or a combination of different SUP35 alleles. Based on our analysis, we propose a model that clarifies the 3D organization of the β-sheet within the prion. We also provide evidence that sup35-M2 and sup35-M4 mutations change the 3D structure of prion complexes. We propose that the destabilization of prion complexes in these mutants is due to the decreased efficiency of the fragmentation of the prion aggregates by chaperone complexes.     

Search for genes influencing the maintenance of the [<Emphasis Type="Italic">ISP</Emphasis><Superscript>+</Superscript>] prion-like antisuppressor determinant in yeast with the use of an insertion gene library

The prion-like determinant [ISP ⁺] manifests itself as an antisuppressor of certain sup35 mutations. To establish that [ISP ⁺] is indeed a new yeast prion, it is necessary to identify the gene that codes for the protein whose prion form is [ISP ⁺]. Analysis of the transformants obtained by transformation of an [ISP ⁺] strain with an insertion gene library revealed three genes controlling the [ISP ⁺] maintenance: UPF1, UPF2, and SFP1. SFP1 codes for a potentially prionogenic protein, which is enriched in Asn and Gln residues, and is thereby the most likely candidate for the [ISP ⁺] structural gene. UPF1 and UPF2 code for components of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. The [ISP ⁺] elimination caused by UPF1 and UPF2 inactivation was reversible, and Upf1p and Upf2p were not functionally related to phosphatase Ppz1p, which influences the [ISP ⁺] manifestation. Possible mechanisms sustaining the influence of UPF1 and UPF2 on [ISP ⁺] maintenance are discussed.     

Rnq1 protein protects [<Emphasis Type="Italic">PSI</Emphasis><Superscript>+</Superscript>] prion from effect of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">PNM</Emphasis> mutation

The interaction of [PSI ⁺] and [PIN ⁺] factors in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is known as the first evidence of prions networks. In [PIN ⁺] cells, Rnq1p prion aggregates work as a template for Sup35p aggregation, which is essential for [PSI ⁺] induction. No additional factors are required for subsequent Sup35p aggregation. Nevertheless, several recent reports provide data that indicate a more complex interplay between these prions. Our results show that the presence of Rnq1p in the cell significantly decreases the loss of [PSI ⁺] prion, which is caused by a double mutation in SUP35 (Q61K, Q62K substitutions in the Sup35 protein). These observations support the existence of interaction networks that converge on a strong linkage of prionogenic and prion-like proteins, and the participation of Rnq1 protein in the maintenance of prion [PSI ⁺].     

The NatA Acetyltransferase Couples Sup35 Prion Complexes to the [PSI+] Phenotype

Protein-only (prion) epigenetic elements confer unique phenotypes by adopting alternate conformations that specify new traits. Given the conformational flexibility of prion proteins, protein-only inheritance requires efficient self-replication of the underlying conformation. To explore the cellular regulation of conformational self-replication and its phenotypic effects, we analyzed genetic interactions between [PSI⁺], a prion form of the S. cerevisiae Sup35 protein (Sup35^[PSI+]), and the three N^α-acetyltransferases, NatA, NatB, and NatC, which collectively modify ~50% of yeast proteins. Although prion propagation proceeds normally in the absence of NatB or NatC, the [PSI⁺] phenotype is reversed in strains lacking NatA. Despite this change in phenotype, [PSI⁺] NatA mutants continue to propagate heritable Sup35^[PSI+]. This uncoupling of protein state and phenotype does not arise through a decrease in the number or activity of prion templates (propagons) or through an increase in soluble Sup35. Rather, NatA null strains are specifically impaired in establishing the translation termination defect that normally accompanies Sup35 incorporation into prion complexes. The NatA effect cannot be explained by the modification of known components of the [PSI⁺] prion cycle including Sup35; thus, novel acetylated cellular factors must act to establish and maintain the tight link between Sup35^[PSI+] complexes and their phenotypic effects.     

The small heat shock protein Hsp31 cooperates with Hsp104 to modulate Sup35 prion aggregation

The yeast homolog of DJ-1, Hsp31, is a multifunctional protein that is involved in several cellular pathways including detoxification of the toxic metabolite methylglyoxal and as a protein deglycase. Prior studies ascribed Hsp31 as a molecular chaperone that can inhibit α-Syn aggregation in vitro and alleviate its toxicity in vivo. It was also shown that Hsp31 inhibits Sup35 aggregate formation in yeast, however, it is unknown if Hsp31 can modulate [PSI⁺] phenotype and Sup35 prionogenesis. Other small heat shock proteins, Hsp26 and Hsp42 are known to be a part of a synergistic proteostasis network that inhibits Sup35 prion formation and promotes its disaggregation. Here, we establish that Hsp31 inhibits Sup35 [PSI⁺] prion formation in collaboration with a well-known disaggregase, Hsp104. Hsp31 transiently prevents prion induction but does not suppress induction upon prolonged expression of Sup35 indicating that Hsp31 can be overcome by larger aggregates. In addition, elevated levels of Hsp31 do not cure [PSI⁺] strains indicating that Hsp31 cannot intervene in a pre-existing prion oligomerization cycle. However, Hsp31 can modulate prion status in cooperation with Hsp104 because it inhibits Sup35 aggregate formation and potentiates [PSI⁺] prion curing upon overexpression of Hsp104. The absence of Hsp31 reduces [PSI⁺] prion curing by Hsp104 without influencing its ability to rescue cellular thermotolerance. Hsp31 did not synergize with Hsp42 to modulate the [PSI⁺] phenotype suggesting that both proteins act on similar stages of the prion cycle. We also showed that Hsp31 physically interacts with Hsp104 and together they prevent Sup35 prion toxicity to greater extent than if they were expressed individually. These results elucidate a mechanism for Hsp31 on prion modulation that suggest it acts at a distinct step early in the Sup35 aggregation process that is different from Hsp104. This is the first demonstration of the modulation of [PSI⁺] status by the chaperone action of Hsp31. The delineation of Hsp31's role in the chaperone cycle has implications for understanding the role of the DJ-1 superfamily in controlling misfolded proteins in neurodegenerative disease and cancer.     

A role for the proteasome in the turnover of Sup35p and in [PSI+] prion propagation

Yeast prions are superb models for understanding the mechanisms of self‐perpetuating protein aggregates formation. [PSI⁺] stands among the most documented yeast prions and results from self‐assembly of the translation termination factor Sup35p into protein fibrils. A plethora of cellular factors were shown to affect [PSI⁺] formation and propagation. Clearance of Sup35p prion particles is however poorly understood and documented. Here, we investigated the role of the proteasome in the degradation of Sup35p and in [PSI⁺] prion propagation. We found that cells lacking the RPN4 gene, which have reduced intracellular proteasome pools, accumulated Sup35p and have defects in [PSI⁺] formation and propagation. Sup35p is degraded in vitro by the 26S and 20S proteasomes in a ubiquitin‐independent manner, generating an array of amyloidogenic peptides derived from its prion‐domain. We also demonstrate the formation of a proteasome‐resistant fragment spanning residues 83–685 which is devoid of the prion‐domain that is essential for [PSI⁺] propagation. Most important was the finding that the 26S and 20S proteasomes degrade Sup35p fibrils in vitro and abolish their infectivity. Our results point to an overlooked role of the proteasome in clearing toxic protein aggregates, and have important implications for a better understanding of the life cycle of infectious protein assemblies.     

Oxidative stress conditions increase the frequency of de novo formation of the yeast [PSI+] prion

Prions are self‐perpetuating amyloid protein aggregates which underlie various neurodegenerative diseases in mammals and heritable traits in yeast. The molecular basis of how yeast and mammalian prions form spontaneously into infectious amyloid‐like structures is poorly understood. We have explored the hypothesis that oxidative stress is a general trigger for prion formation using the yeast [PSI⁺] prion, which is the altered conformation of the Sup35 translation termination factor. We show that the frequency of [PSI⁺] prion formation is elevated under conditions of oxidative stress and in mutants lacking key antioxidants. We detect increased oxidation of Sup35 methionine residues in antioxidant mutants and show that overexpression of methionine sulphoxide reductase abrogates both the oxidation of Sup35 and its conversion to the [PSI⁺] prion. [PSI⁺] prion formation is particularly elevated in a mutant lacking the Sod1 Cu,Zn‐superoxide dismutase. We have used fluorescence microscopy to show that the de novo appearance of [PSI⁺] is both rapid and increased in frequency in this mutant. Finally, electron microscopy analysis of native Sup35 reveals that similar fibrillar structures are formed in both the wild‐type and antioxidant mutants. Together, our data indicate that oxidative stress is a general trigger of [PSI⁺] formation, which can be alleviated by antioxidant defenses.     

Autophagy protects against de novo formation of the [PSI+] prion in yeast

Prions are self-propagating, infectious proteins that underlie several neurodegenerative diseases. The molecular basis underlying their sporadic formation is poorly understood. We show that autophagy protects against de novo formation of [PSI⁺], which is the prion form of the yeast Sup35 translation termination factor. Autophagy is a cellular degradation system, and preventing autophagy by mutating its core components elevates the frequency of spontaneous [PSI⁺] formation. Conversely, increasing autophagic flux by treating cells with the polyamine spermidine suppresses prion formation in mutants that normally show a high frequency of de novo prion formation. Autophagy also protects against the de novo formation of another prion, namely the Rnq1/[PIN⁺] prion, which is not related in sequence to the Sup35/[PSI⁺] prion. We show that growth under anaerobic conditions in the absence of molecular oxygen abrogates Sup35 protein damage and suppresses the high frequency of [PSI⁺] formation in an autophagy mutant. Autophagy therefore normally functions to remove oxidatively damaged Sup35, which accumulates in cells grown under aerobic conditions, but in the absence of autophagy, damaged/misfolded Sup35 undergoes structural transitions favoring its conversion to the propagatable [PSI⁺] form.     

A new perspective on Hsp104-mediated propagation and curing of the yeast prion [PSI+]

Most prions in yeast form amyloid fibrils that must be severed by the protein disaggregase Hsp104 to be propagated and transmitted efficiently to newly formed buds. Only one yeast prion, [PSI⁺], is cured by Hsp104 overexpression. We investigated the interaction between Hsp104 and Sup35, the priongenic protein in yeast that forms the [PSI⁺] prion.1 Helsen CW, Glover JR. Insight into molecular basis of curing of [PSI+] prion by overexpression of 104-kDa heat shock protein (Hsp104). J Biol Chem 2012; 287:542 - 56; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.302869; PMID: 22081611 [Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar] We found that a 20-amino acid segment within the highly-charged, unstructured middle domain of Sup35 contributes to the physical interaction between the middle domain and Hsp104. When this segment was deleted from Sup35, the efficiency of [PSI⁺] severing was substantially reduced, resulting in larger Sup35 particles and weakening of the [PSI⁺] phenotype. Furthermore, [PSI⁺] in these cells was completely resistant to Hsp104 curing. The affinity of Hsp104 was considerably weaker than that of model Hsp104-binding proteins and peptides, implying that Sup35 prions are not ideal substrates for Hsp104-mediated remodeling. In light of this finding, we present a modified model of Hsp104-mediated [PSI⁺] propagation and curing that requires only partial remodeling of Sup35 assembled into amyloid fibrils.