Photoirradiation reactions and crystal structures of two geometrical isomers of [Ru(OAc)(2cqn)2NO] (H2cqn=2-chloro-8-quinolinol)

The photoirradiation reactions of two geometrical isomers (cis-1 and cis-2) of [Ru(OAc)(2cqn)₂NO] (H2cqn=2-chloro-8-quinolinol) were studied. Cis-2 [Ru(OAc)(2cqn)₂NO] (2) photochemically isomerized to cis-1 [Ru(OAc)(2cqn)₂NO] (1) in CH₂Cl₂ or DMSO using an Xe lamp as a light source and the reaction was irreversible. The 2 to 1 isomerization coexisting with ¹⁵NO gas and its evolution of the ¹H NMR spectra showed that the dissociation and recombination of both the NO and the acetate ion involve in the isomerization. On the other hand, 1 did not isomerize but the NO ligand exchanged with ¹⁵NO. The crystal structures of 1 and 2 were determined by X-ray diffraction.     

Electrospray mass spectrometry of trans-[Ru(NO)Cl(dpaH)2] (dpaH=2,2′-dipyridylamine) and ‘caged NO’, [RuCl3(NO)(H2O)2]: loss of HCl and NO from positive ions versus NO and Cl from negative ions

The positive ion electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) of trans-[Ru(NO)Cl)(dpaH)₂]Cl₂ (dpaH=2,2′-dipyridylamine), obtained from the carrier solvent of H₂O–CH₃OH (50:50), revealed 1+ ions of the formulas [Ru^II(NO⁺)Cl(dpaH)(dpa)]⁺ (m/z=508), [Ru^IIICl(dpaH)(dpa⁻)]⁺ (m/z=478), [Ru^II(NO⁺)(dpa)₂]⁺ (m/z=472), [Ru^III(dpa)₂]⁺ (m/z=442), originating from proton dissociation from the parent [Ru^II(NO⁺)Cl(dpaH)₂]²⁺ ion with subsequent loss of NO (17.4% of dissociative events) or loss of HCl (82.6% of dissociative events). Further loss of NO from the m/z=472 fragment yields the m/z=442 fragment. Thus, ionization of the NH moiety of dpaH is a significant factor in controlling the net ionic charge in the gas phase, and allowing preferential dissociation of HCl in the fragmentation processes. With NaCl added, an ion pair, {Na[Ru^II(NO)Cl(dpa)₂]}⁺ (m/z=530; 532), is detectable. All these positive mass peaks that contain Ru carry a signature ‘handprint’ of adjacent m/z peaks due to the isotopic distribution of ¹⁰⁴Ru, ¹⁰²Ru, ¹⁰¹Ru, ⁹⁹Ru, ⁹⁸Ru and ⁹⁶Ru mass centered around ¹⁰¹Ru for each fragment, and have been matched to the theoretical isotopic distribution for each set of peaks centered on the main isotope peak. When the starting complex is allowed to undergo aquation for two weeks in H₂O, loss of the axial Cl⁻ is shown by the approximately 77% attenuation of the [Ru^II(NO⁺)Cl(dpaH)(dpa)]⁺ ion, being replaced by the [Ru^II(NO⁺)(H₂O)(dpa)₂]⁺ (m/z=490) as the most abundant high-mass species. Loss of H₂O is observed to form [Ru^II(NO⁺)(dpa)₂]⁺ (m/z=472). No positive ion mass spectral peaks were observed for RuCl₃(NO)(H₂O)₂, ‘caged NO’. Negative ions were observed by proton dissociation forming [Ru^II(NO)Cl₃(H₂O)(OH)]⁻ in the ionization chamber, detecting the parent 1− ion at m/z=274, followed by the loss of NO as the main dissociative pathway that produces [Ru^IIICl₃(H₂O)(OH)]⁻ (m/z=244). This species undergoes reductive elimination of a chlorine atom, forming [Ru^IICl₂(H₂O)(OH)]⁻ (m/z=208). The ease of the NO dissociation is increased for the negative ions, which should be more able to stabilize a Ru^III product upon NO loss.     

On the lability of dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) coordinated to the [Ru(II)-NO(+)] species: X-ray structures of mer-[RuCl(3)(DMSO)(2)(NO)] and mer-[RuCl(3)(CD(3)CN)(DMSO)(NO)

The syntheses of nitrosyl–dimethylsulfoxide–ruthenium(II) complexes with general formula mer-[RuCl₃(L)(DMSO)(NO)] (L=DMSO or CD₃CN) is reported. The mer-[RuCl₃(DMSO)₂(NO)] (1) complex was obtained from the reaction of [RuCl₃(NO)] with the sulfoxide ligand in acetone. The mer-[RuCl₃(CD₃CN)(DMSO)(NO)] (2) compound was obtained from mer-[RuCl₃(DMSO)₂(NO)] maintained in deuterated acetonitrile. These data suggest a slow kinetic reaction due the low lability of the DMSO ligand coordinated to the {Ru^II–NO⁺} species. The crystal and molecular structures of (1) and (2) have been determined from X-ray studies. Crystal data: for (1), monoclinic, P2₁/c, a=8.8340(2) Å, b=12.0230(3) Å, c=13.7064(4) Å, β=114.546(2)°, Z=4, R1=0.0429; for (2), monoclinic, P21/n, a=10.0180(7) Å, b=9.5070(7) Å, c=13.3340(9) Å, β=102.264(4)°, Z=4, R1=0.0472. The spectroscopic characterization of (1), in solid state (infrared spectrum) and in solution (nuclear magnetic resonance and cyclic voltammetry) is also described.     

Relationship between pKa of 8-quinolinol derivatives and a π-donor ability of the 8-quinolinolato oxygen in linear nitrosylruthenium(II) complexes

The relationship between the pK_a of 8-quinolinol derivatives {8-quinolinol (Hqn), 2-methyl- (H2-Meqn), 2,4-dimethyl- (H2,4-diMeqn), 5-chloro- (H5-Clqn) and 5,7-dichloro-8-quinolinols (H5,7-diClqn)} and a π-donor ability of the 8-quinolinolato oxygens has been investigated by the identification of the structures of the major products, [RuCl(QN)(QN′)NO] (HQN=8-quinolinol derivative; HQN′=different 8-quinolinol derivatives), obtained by the reaction of [RuCl₃(QN or QN′)NO]⁻ with HQN′ or HQN. The results obtained clearly showed that the oxygen of the 8-quinolinol derivative that has a higher pK_a predominantly coordinates in the trans position to the NO ligand and is a better π-electron donor. The order of the π-electron donor ability for the oxygen of the 8-quinolinol derivatives is as follows: H2-Meqn≥H2,4-diMeqn>Hqn≥H5-Clqn>H5,7-diClqn, almost agreeing with the magnitude of the pK_a values of the corresponding 8-quinolinols. The structures of cis-1 [RuCl(5,7-diClqn)₂NO] and cis-1 [RuCl(5,7-diClqn)(2-Meqn)NO] were determined by X-ray diffraction.     

Synthesis and structures of the cuboidal iron-sulfur-nitrosyl-phosphine clusters [Fe4S3(NO)4(PR3)3] (R = Et, Pr, C6H11)

A series of cuboidal iron-sulfur clusters [Fe₄S₃(NO)₄(PR₃)₃]^0,1+ (R = Et, Prⁱ, Cy) were synthesized by two routes: reductive desulfurization of [Fe₄S₄(NO)₄] by tertiary phosphines, and substitution of triphenylphosphine in [Fe₄4S₃(NO)₄(PPh₃)₃] by a more basic phosphine. The structures of 3[Fe₄S₃(NO)₄(PEt₃)₃] · 0.5Et₂O, [Fe₄S₃(NO)₄(PEt₃)₃] [Fe₄S₃(NO)₇] and partially substituted [Fe₄S₃(NO)₄(PPh₃)_2⁻ (PPrⁱ₃)] have been determined by X-ray diffraction in order to define the cuboidal Fe₄S₃ core, previously known only in Roussin's black anion and its reduced form, [Fe₄S₃(NO)₇7]^1−,2−, and as a part of the iron-molybdenum cofactor of nitrogenase.     

Solution and crystal structure of the dihydrogen complex [Ru(H2)(H)(PMe2Ph)4]PF6, an active alkyne hydrogenation catalyst

The complex [Ru(H₂)(H)(PMe₂Ph)₄]PF₆ (1) has been prepared by reaction of [Ru(H)(PMe₂Ph)₅] FP₆ (2) in THF with 1 atm H₂ and characterised by variable temperature ³¹P and ¹H NMR. It undergoes four distinct fluxional processes listed in order of decreasing activation energy: (i) exchange of H₂ in solution with the dihydrogen ligand above 273 K; (ii) isomerisation of cis and trans isomers of 1 above 230 K; (iii) exchange of H atoms between H₂ and hydride in trans-1 above 180 K; (iv) rapid H₂/hydride exchange in cis-1 to below 180 K. A single crystal X-ray diffraction study of 1 at 173 K shows that the complex has the cis geometry in the solid state but does not clearly reveal the positions of the hydrogen ligands. Complex 1 starts out as a catalyst of high activity for the selective hydrogenation of 1-alkynes to 1-alkenes (RC≡CH; R=¹¹Bu, Ph) but it is rapidly deactivated, possibly because of formation of the enynyl complex [Ru(η³RC₃CHR)(PMe₂Ph)₄]⁺. Complex 1 efficiently catalyzes the hydrogenation of internal alkynes (3-hexyne, 2-pentyne) to internal cis-alkenes with little deactivation, although some isomerisation of the alkene produced is observed. These observations are consistent with those of Nkosi, Coville, Albers and Singleton who reported that complex 2 must dissociate one PMe₂Ph ligand to produce the species active for alkyne hydrogenation. Complex 2 catalyses these hydrogenations with slower initial rates than complex 1 but deactivates less readily. In contrast to 1, complex 2 does not appear to cause the isomerisation of internal alkenes.     

Synthesis and properties of the dichloro [tetramethyl (trifluoromethyl)cyclopentadienyl]ruthenium dimer: X-ray structure of [M2(η-C5Me4CF3)2Cl2(μ-Cl)2] (M=Ru, Rh)

The reaction of RuCl₃(H₂O), with C₅Me₄CF₃J in refluxing EtOH gives [Ru₂(η⁵-C₅Me₁CF₂)₂ (μ-Cl₂] (20 in 44% yield. Dimer 2 antiferromagnetic (−2J=200 cm¹). The crystal structures of 2 (rhombohedral system, R3 space group, Z=9, R=0.0589) and [Rh₂(η⁵-C₅Me₄CF₃(₂Cl₂(μ-Cl)₂] (3) (rhombohedral system. space group, Z = 9, R = 0.0641) were solved; both complexes have dimeric structures with a trans arrangement of the η⁵-C₅Me₄CF₄ rings. Comparison of the geometry of 2 and 3 with those of the corresponding η⁵-C₅Me₅ complexes shows that lowering the ring symmetry causes significant distortion of the M₂(μ-Cl)₂ moiety. The analysis of the MCl₃ fragment conformations in 2 and 3 and in the η⁵-C₅ME₅ analogues shows that they are correlated with the M---M distances. The Cl atoms are displaced by Br on reaction of 2 with KBr in MeOH to give the diamagnetic dimer [Ru₂(η⁵-C₅Me₄CF₃)₂Br₂ (μ-Br₂] (4). Complex 2 reacts with O₂ in CH₂Cl₂ solution at ambient temperature to form a mixture of isomeric η⁶-fulvene dimers [Ru₂(η⁶-C₅Me₃CF₃ = CH₂)₂Cl₂(μ-Cl)₂] (5). Reactions of 5 with CO and allyl chloride give Ru(η⁵-C₅Me₃CF₃CH₂Cl)(CO)₂Cl (6) and Ru(η⁵-C₅Me₃CF₃CF₃CH₂Cl)(η³-C₃H₅)Cl₂ (7) respectively.     

The synthesis and structural characterization of the technetium nitrosyl complexes [TcCl(NO)(SC5H4N)(PPh3)2] and [Tc(NO)(SC5H4N)2(PPh3)]

The reaction of the Tc(I) complex [Tc(NO)Cl₂(HOMe)(PPh₃)₂] with stoichiometric amounts of 2-mercatopyridine and a proton scavenger yields [Tc(NO)Cl(Spy)(PPh₃)₂] or [Tc(NO)(Spy)₂(PPh₃)], depending upon quantities of ligands employed. These two complexes have been structurally characterized. The small bite angles of the bidentate mercaptopyridine ligands cause significant deviation from octahedral coordination geometry.     

Alkene rotation in [Ru(η-C5H5) (L2) (η-alkene][CF3SO3] with L2 = iPr- or pTol-diazabutadiene. X-ray crystal structure of [Ru(η-C5H5(pTol-DAB) (η-ethene][CF3SO3]

Reaction of RuCl(η⁵-C₅H₅(pTol-DAB) with AgOTf (OTf = CF₃SO₃) in CH₂Cl₂ or THF and subsequent addition of L′ (L′ = ethene (a), dimethyl fumarate (b), fumaronitrile (c) or CO (d) led to the ionic complexes [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(pTol-DAB)(L′)][OTf] 2a, 2b and 2d and [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(pTol-DAB)(fumarontrile-N)][OTf] 5c. With the use of resonance Raman spectroscopy, the intense absorption bands of the complexes have been assigned to MLCT transitions to the iPr-DAB ligand. The X-ray structure determination of [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(pTol-DAB)(η²-ethene)][CF₃SO₃] (2a) has been carried out. Crystal data for 2a: monoclinic, space group P2₁/n with A = 10.840(1), b = 16.639(1), C = 14.463(2) Å, β = 109.6(1)°, V = 2465.6(5) ų, Z = 4. Complex 2a has a piano stool structure, with the Cp ring η⁵-bonded, the pTol-DAB ligand σN, σN′ bonded (Ru-N distances 2.052(4) and 2.055(4) Å), and the ethene η²-bonded to the ruthenium center (Ru-C distances 2.217(9) and 2.206(8) Å). The C = C bond of the ethene is almost coplanar with the plane of the Cp ring, and the angle between the plane of the Cp ring and the double of the ethene is 1.8(0.2)°. The reaction of [RuCl(η⁵-C₅H₅)(PPh)₃ with AgOTf and ligands L′ = a and d led to [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(PPh₃)₂(L′)]OTf] (3a) and (3d), respectively. By variable temperature NMR spectroscopy the rottional barrier of ethene (a), dimethyl fumarate (b and fumaronitrile (c) in complexes [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(L₂)(η²-alkene][OTf] with L₂ = iPr-DAB (a, 1b, 1c), pTol-DAB (2a, 2b) and L = PPh₃ (3a) was determined. For 1a, 1b and 2b the barrier is 41.5±0.5, 62±1 and 59±1 kJ mol⁻¹, respectively. The intermediate exchange could not be reached for 1c, and the ΔG^# was estimated to be at least 61 kJ mol⁻. For 2a and 3a the slow exchange could not be reached. The rotational barrier for 2a was estimated to be 40 kJ mol⁻. The rotational barier for methyl propiolate (HC≡CC(O)OCH₃) (k) in complex [Ru(η⁵-C₅H₅)(iPr-DAB) η²-HC≡CC(O)OCH₃)][OTf] (1k) is 45.3±0.2 kJ mol⁻¹. The collected data show that the barrier of rotational of the alkene in complexes 1a, 2a, 1b, 2b and 1c does not correlate with the strength of the metal-alkene interaction in the ground state.     

Syntheses, spectra and crystal structures of ruthenium(II) complexes with polypyridyl: [Ru(bipy)2(phen)](ClO4)2 · H2O and [Ru(bipy)2(Me-phen)](ClO4)2

Two ruthenium(II) complexes with polypyridyl, Ru(bipy)₂(phen)](ClO₄)₂·H₂O (1) and [Ru(bipy)₂(Me-phen)](ClO₄)₂ (2), (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, bipy = 2,2′-bipyridine, Me-phen = 5-methyl-1,10-phenanthroline), were synthesized and characterized by IR, MS and NMR spectra. Their structures were determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction techniques. The strong steric interaction between the polypyridyl ligands was relieved neither by the elongation of the Ru---N bonds nor increase of the N---Ru---N bite angles. The coordination sphere was distorted to relieve the ligand interaction by forming specific angles (δ) between the polypyridyl ligand planes and coordination planes (N---Ru---N), and forming larger twisted angles between the two pyridine rings for each bipy. The bond distances of Ru---N(bipy) and Ru---N(phen) were virtually identical with experimental error, as expected of π back-bonding interactions which statistically involve each of the ligands present in the coordination sphere.     

Photochemical reactions of trans-[Ru(NH3)4L(NO)] complexes

The photochemical behavior of a series of trans-[Ru(NH₃)₄L(NO)]³⁺ complexes, where L=nitrogen bound imidazole, L-histidine, 4-picoline, pyridine, nicotinamide, pyrazine, 4-acetylpyridine, or triethylphosphite is reported. In addition to ligand localized absorption bands (<300 nm), the electronic spectra of these complexes are dominated by relatively low intensity bands assigned as ligand field (LF) and metal to ligand (d_π → NO) charge transfer (MLCT) transitions. Irradiation of aqueous solutions of these complexes with near-UV light (300-370 nm) labilizes NO, i.e.,

     

Convenient preparation of [CuX(PCy3)2](X = Br, I, SCN, N3) complexes. X-ray crystal structure of [Cu(N3)(PCy3)2] (Cy = cyclo-C6H11)

The labile cations [Cu(F-BF₃)(PCy₃)₂] and [Cu(OTf)(PCy₃)₂] are versatile precursors for the formation of [Cu(X)(PCy₃)₂] (X = Br, I, SCN, N₃) complexes by metathesis with NaX. The azide [Cu(N₃)(PCy₃)₂] is triclinic, space group , a = 9.755(4), B = 22.78(1), C = 9.284(6) Å, = 96.76(3), β = 115.36(3), γ = 94.20(5)°, Z = 2.     

Structural analysis and magnetic properties of the copper(II) dicyanamide complexes [Cu2(dmphen)2(dca)4], [Cu(dmphen)(dca)(NO3)]n and [Cu(4,4-dmbpy)(H2O)(dca)2] (dca=dicyanamide; dmphen=2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline; 4,4-dmbpy=4,4-dimethyl-2,2-bipyridine)

The preparation, crystal structures and magnetic properties of three copper(II) compounds of formulae [Cu₂(dmphen)₂(dca)₄] (1), [Cu(dmphen)(dca)(NO₃)]_n (2) and [Cu(4,4^′-dmbpy)(H₂O)(dca)₂] (3) (dmphen=2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline, dca=dicyanamide and 4,4^′-dmbpy=4,4^′-dimethyl-2,2^′-bipyridine) are reported. The structure of 1 consists of discrete copper(II) dinuclear units with double end-to-end dca bridges whereas that of 2 is made up of neutral uniform copper(II) chains with a single symmetrical end-to-end dca bridge. Each copper atom in 1 and 2 is in a distorted square pyramidal environment: two (1) or one (2) nitrile-nitrogen atoms from bridging dca groups, one of the nitrogen atoms of the dmphen molecule (1 and 2) and either one nitrile-nitrogen from a terminal dca ligand (1) or a nitrate-oxygen atom (2) build the equatorial plane whereas the second nitrogen atom of the heterocyclic dmphen fills the axial position (1 and 2). The copper-copper separations through double (1) and single (2) end-to-end dca bridges are 7.1337(7) (1) and 7.6617(7) (2). Compound 3 is a mononuclear copper(II) complex whose structure contains two neutral and crystallographically independent [Cu(4,4^′-dmbpy)(H₂O)(dca)₂] molecules which are packed in two different layer arrangements running parallel to the bc-plane and alternating along the a-axis. The copper atoms in both molecules have slightly distorted square pyramidal surroundings with the two nitrogen atoms of the 4,4^′-dmbpy ligand and two dca nitrile-nitrogen atoms in the basal plane and a water oxygen in the apical position. A semi co-ordinated dca nitrile-nitrogen from a neighbour unit [2.952(6) Å for Cu(2)-N] is in trans position to the apical water molecule in one of the two molecules, this feature representing part of the difference in supramolecular connections in the alternating layers referred to above. Magnetic susceptibility measurements for 1-3 in the temperature range 1.9-290 K reveal the occurrence of weak antiferromagnetic interactions through double [J=−3.3 cm⁻¹ (1), ] and single [J=−0.57 cm⁻¹ (2), ] dca bridges and across intermolecular contacts [θ=−0.07 K (3)].     

Hydrogen bonding: further evidence for the cause of the color change of nitrosylpentaamminechromium (III) compounds. Crystal structures of [Cr(NO)(NH3)5](PF6)2 and [Cr(NO)(NH3)5]Cl(PF6)

The crystal structures of [Cr(NO)(NH₃)₅](PF₆)₂ (red) and [Cr(NO)(NH₃)₅]Cl(PF₆) (brown) have been determined. The [Cr(NO)(NH₃)₅]²⁺(A) complex cations in these compounds have a slightly distorted octahedral geometry with a strictly linear Cr-N-O arrangement (from symmetry). The short interatomic distances (2.399 Å × 4) between the O (nitrosyl) and H (ammonia in adjacent complex cations) atoms in A(PF₆)₂ indicate the existence of hydrogen bonds, while the interatomic distances (3.258 Å × 8) between those in ACl(PF₆) are much longer, and the hydrogen bonds should be weak in spite of the presence of the smaller counter anion of chloride ion in ACl(PF₆). Comparisons of the five crystal structures of A(PF₆)₂, ACl₂, ACl(ClO₄), ACl(PF₆), and A(ClO₄)₂ have led to the conclusion that the existence of the strong hydrogen bonds gives red crystals of A(PF₆)₂, while the absence of hydrogen bonds results in the formation of green crystals of A(ClO₄)₂ (O ? H, 3.595 Å × 2). The color change of the crystals (from red to green) with the change of outer sphere anions is attributed to the change of the strength of the hydrogen bonding between the complex cations.     

Dinuclear sulfide–thiolate complexes [Pt2(μ-S)(μ-SR)(PPh3)4] as cationic metalloligands

The cationic monoalkylated derivatives of the well-known metalloligand [Pt₂(μ-S)₂(PPh₃)₄], viz. [Pt₂(μ-S)(μ-SR)(PPh₃)₄]⁺ (R = n-Bu, CH₂Ph) are themselves able to act as metalloligands towards the Ph₃PAu⁺ and R′Hg⁺ (R′ = Ph or ferrocenyl) fragments, by reaction with Ph₃PAuCl or R′HgCl, respectively. The resulting dicationic products [Pt₂(μ-SR)(μ-SAuPPh₃)(PPh₃)₄]²⁺ and [Pt₂(μ-SR)(μ-SHgR′)(PPh₃)₄]²⁺ are readily isolated as their hexafluorophosphate salts, and have been fully characterised by spectroscopic techniques and an X-ray structure determination on [Pt₂(μ-SR)(μ-SHgFc)(PPh₃)₄](PF₆)₂.     

Ligand connected metal clusters. The molecular structures and solid state packing of {Ru3(CO)11}2(bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) and {Ru3(CO)11}2(1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)benzene)

The preparation and structural characterization of {Ru₃(CO)₁₁}₂(1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)benzene), a modified synthesis of 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)benzene, and the structural characterization of {Ru₃(CO)₁₁}₂(bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) are reported. In both compounds two metal cluster units are connected through ditertiary-phosphine ligands. Both molecules consist of centrosymmetric units in which the diphosphine ligands are largely covered by the triangular ruthenium clusters. No direct interaction between the two cluster units occurs within individual molecules. Molecular packing in the solid state is dominated by interactions between sets of carbon monoxide ligands in motifs that were previously identified in the solid state structure of the parent cluster, Ru₃(CO)₁₂.     

Bis(mercapto) and hydrido(thiolate) complexes of Ru(II)–dppm (dppm=Ph2PCH2PPh2)

From a mixture of cis- and trans-Ru(SH)₂(dppm)₂ (4), formed from reaction of H₂S with trans-Ru(H)Cl(dppm)₂ (2), a crystal of cis-4 has been isolated and its structure determined by X-ray analysis. The mercapto protons are located within the centrosymmetric structure, although the S-atoms are partially disordered (S–H1.06 Å). The thiolate complexes, trans-Ru(H)SR(dppm)₂ (R=Ph, 5a; C₆F₅, 5b), have been isolated from reaction of trans-2 with 1 equiv. of RSH. trans-Ru(H)SH(dppm)₂ (3) has been isolated from reaction of H₂S with a mixture of cis- and trans-Ru(H)₂(dppm)₂ (1). An improved synthetic route for 1 is presented.     

Mixed anion lanthanide(III) crown ether complexes: crystal structures of [LaCl2(NO3)(12-crown-4)]2, [La(NO3)(OH2)4-(12-crown-4)]Cl2·CH3CN and [LaCl2(NO3)(18-crown-6)]

Reaction of LaCl₃·7H₂O containing small amounts of La(NO₃)₃·7H₂O as an impurity with 12-crown-4 or 18-crown-6 in 3:1 CH₃CN:CH₃OH resulted in the isolation of the mixed anion complexes [LaCl₂(NO₃)(12-crown-4)]₂, [La(NO₃)(OH₂)₄(12-crown-4)]Cl₂·CH₃CN and [LaCl₂(NO₃)(18-crown-6)]. The nine-coordinate dimer, [LaCl₂(NO₃)(12-crown-4)]₂, has all of the anions in the inner coordination sphere and La³⁺ has a capped square antiprismatic geometry. It crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbca with (at −150 °C) a = 12.938(6), B = 15.704(3), C = 13.962(2) Å, and D_calc = 2.08 g cm⁻³ for Z = 4. The second complex isolated from the same reaction, [La(NO₃)(OH₂)₄(12-crown-4)]Cl₂·CH₃CN, has the bidentate nitrate anion in the inner coordination sphere but the two chloride anions are in a hydrogen bonded outer sphere. This complex is ten-coordinate 4A,6B-expanded dodecahedral and crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2₁ with (at 20 °C) A = 7.651(2), B = 11.704(7), C = 11.608(4) Å, β = 95.11(2)°, and D_calc = 1.80 g cm⁻³ for Z = 2. The 18-crown-6 complex, [LaCl₂(NO₃)(18-crown-6)], has all inner sphere anions and has ten-coordinate 4A,6B-expanded dodecahedral La³⁺ centers. It crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbca with (at 20 °C) a = 14.122(7), B = 13.563(5), C = 19.311(9) Å, and D_calc = 1.89 g cm⁻³ for Z = 8.     

Low-dimensional compounds containing bioactive ligands. Part XIV: High selective antiproliferative activity of tris(5-chloro-8-quinolinolato)gallium(III) complex against human cancer cell lines

Four gallium(III) complexes, [Ga(ClQ)₃]⋅MeOH (1 – MeOH), [Ga(ClQ)₃] (1), [Ga(BrQ)₃] (2), [Ga(dIQ)₃] (3) and [Ga(CQ)₃] (4), were prepared (H-ClQ = 5-chloro-8-quinolinol, H-BrQ = 7-bromo-8-quinolinol, H-dIQ = 5,7-diiodo-8-quinolinol, H-CQ = 5-chloro-7-iodo-8-quinolinol) and characterised by elemental analysis, IR and NMR spectroscopy. Single crystal structure analysis of 1 – MeOH confirmed that the complex has a molecular structure with gallium(III) metal ion coordinated in mer-fashion by N- and O-donor atoms of three ClQ ligands. Stability of all complexes in DMSO was proved by ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The in vitro antiproliferative activity of 1 was evaluated against the A2780, MBA-MB-231 and HCT116 cell lines. Complex 1 displays higher antiproliferative activity (IC₅₀ values in the range 2.1–6 μm) compared to the ClQ ligand and cisplatin; and a significant selective antiproliferative potency (IC₅₀ = 136 μm, for normal MRC5pd30 cell line). Radical scavenging experiments revealed that complex 1 exhibits the highest antioxidant activity of the prepared complexes as well as the ligands.     

Five-coordinate rhenium(III)-thiolato complexes: the structure of [Re(SCH2PhOCH3)3(PPh3)2]

A novel five-coordinate rhenium(III)-thiolato complex, Re(SCH₂C₆H₄OCH₃-p)₃(PPh₃)₂ has been isolated during the reaction of trans-ReOCl₃(PPh₃)₂ with p-methoxybenzyl mercaptan. In the unexpected structure that was acquired, the central metal has undergone a reduction from Re(V) to Re(III). The five-coordinate Re(III) complex has been characterized by spectroscopic methods, elemental analysis and X-ray crystallography. X-ray crystallographic studies showed the coordination geometry around rhenium to be that of a trigonal bipyramid. The basal plane is defined by three sulfur atoms of the monodentate ligand, while the two apical positions are occupied by two phosphines of the precursor.