Developmental expression of a neurofilament-M and two vimentin-like genes in Xenopus laevis

A hamster vimentin cDNA probe has been used to isolate and characterize three Xenopus laevis intermediate filament genes, named XIF1, XIF3 and XIF6. Of these, XIF6 shows 89% homology at the amino acid level to a portion of porcine neurofilament-M. XIF6 is transcribed solely in nervous tissue of embryos, commencing at the late neural tube stage. Expression is totally dependent on an interaction between mesoderm and ectoderm during gastrulation and can be used as a marker of neural induction. XIF1 shows 94% homology and XIF3 83% homology to hamster vimentin at the amino acid level over a region of the protein. Although XIF1 and XIF3 show more homology to vimentin than to any other intermediate filament gene, they have distinct temporal and spatial patterns of expression. XIF1 expression most resembles that of vimentin in higher vertebrates, being expressed in embryonic myotome and nerve cord, whilst XIF3 is unusual in that its expression is restricted predominantly to the head in tailbud embryos.     

Neural expression of the Xenopus homeobox gene Xhox3: evidence for a patterning neural signal that spreads through the ectoderm

The Xenopus laevis homeobox gene Xhox3 is expressed in the axial mesoderm of gastrula and neurula stage embryos. By the late neurula-early tailbud stage, mesodermal expression is no longer detectable and expression appears in the growing tailbud and in neural tissue. In situ hybridization analysis of the expression of Xhox3 in neural tissue shows that it is restricted within the neural tube and the cranial neural crest during the tailbud-early tadpole stages. In late tadpole stages, Xhox3 is only expressed in the mid/hindbrain area and can therefore be considered a marker of anterior neural development. To investigate the mechanism responsible for the anterior-posterior (A-P) regionalization of the neural tissue, the expression of Xhox3 has been analysed in total exogastrula. In situ hybridization analyses of exogastrulated embryos show that Xhox3 is expressed in the apical ectoderm of total exogastrulae, a region that develops in the absence of anterior axial mesoderm. The results provide further support for the existence of a neuralizing signal, which originates from the organizer region and spreads through the ectoderm. Moreover, the data suggest that this neural signal also has a role in A-P patterning the neural ectoderm.     

Transgenic Xenopus embryos reveal that anterior neural development requires continued suppression of BMP signaling after gastrulation.

In vertebrates, BMP signaling before gastrulation suppresses neural development. Later in development, BMP signaling specifies a dorsal and ventral fate in the forebrain and dorsal fate in the spinal cord. It is therefore possible that a change in the competence of the ectoderm to respond to BMP signaling occurs at some point in development. We report that exposure of the anterior neural plate to BMP4 before gastrulation causes suppression of all neural markers tested. To determine the effects of BMP4 after gastrulation, we misexpressed BMP4 using a Pax-6 promoter fragment in transgenic frog embryos and implanted beads soaked in BMP4 in the anterior neural plate. Suppression of most anterior neural markers was observed. We conclude that most neural genes continue to require suppression of BMP signaling into the neurula stages. Additionally, we report that BMP4 and BMP7 are abundantly expressed in the prechordal mesoderm of the neurula stage embryo. This poses the paradox of how the expression of most neural genes is maintained if they can be inhibited by BMP signaling. We show that at least one gene in the anterior neural plate suppresses the response of the ectoderm to BMP signaling. We propose that the suppressive effect of BMP signaling on the expression of neural genes coupled with localized suppressors of BMP signaling result in the fine-tuning of gene expression in the anterior neural plate.     

A labile period in the determination of the anterior-posterior axis during early neural development in Xenopus.

The process by which the vertebrate central nervous system acquires its regional properties remains a central problem in developmental biology. It is generally argued that at early gastrula stages the dorsal mesoderm possesses precise anterior-posterior positional information, which is subsequently imparted to the overlying ectoderm. However, using regionally specific gene probes to monitor regional responses in Xenopus embryos, we find that anterior-posterior properties are not fixed until early neurula stages. During gastrulation the regional inducing capacities of the dorsal mesoderm as well as the regional responses of the presumptive neural ectoderm are activated along the entire anterior-posterior axis when these properties are assayed in recombinant and explant experiments, respectively. Restriction of regional inducing capacity in the mesoderm and responsiveness in the neural ectoderm occur only at neural plate stages.     

Analysis of Wnt8 for neural posteriorizing factor by identifying Frizzled 8c and Frizzled 9 as functional receptors for Wnt8

The dorsal ectoderm of vertebrate gastrula is first specified into anterior fate by an activation signal and posteriorized by a graded transforming signal, leading to the formation of forebrain, midbrain, hindbrain and spinal cord along the anteroposterior (A-P) axis. Transplanted non-axial mesoderm rather than axial mesoderm has an ability to transform prospective anterior neural tissue into more posterior fates in zebrafish. Wnt8 is a secreted factor that is expressed in non-axial mesoderm. To investigate whether Wnt8 is the neural posteriorizing factor that acts upon neuroectoderm, we first assigned Frizzled 8c and Frizzled 9 to be functional receptors for Wnt8. We then, transplanted non-axial mesoderm into the embryos in which Wnt8 signaling is cell-autonomously blocked by the dominant-negative form of Wnt8 receptors. Non-axial mesodermal transplants in embryos in which Wnt8 signaling is cell-autonomously blocked induced the posterior neural markers as efficiently as in wild-type embryos, suggesting that Wnt8 signaling is not required in neuroectoderm for posteriorization by non-axial mesoderm. Furthermore, Wnt8 signaling, detected by nuclear localization of beta-catenin, was not activated in the posterior neuroectoderm but confined in marginal non-axial mesoderm. Finally, ubiquitous over-expression of Wnt8 does not expand neural ectoderm of posterior character in the absence of mesoderm or Nodal-dependent co-factors. We thus conclude that other factors from non-axial mesoderm may be required for patterning neuroectoderm along the A-P axis.     

otx2 expression in the ectoderm activates anterior neural determination and is required for Xenopus cement gland formation.

We previously showed that otx2 regulates Xenopus cement gland formation in the ectoderm. Here, we show that otx2 is sufficient to direct anterior neural gene expression, and that its activity is required for cement gland and anterior neural determination. otx2 activity at midgastrula activates anterior and prevents expression of posterior and ventral gene expression in whole embryos and ectodermal explants. These data suggest that part of the mechanism by which otx2 promotes anterior determination involves repression of posterior and ventral fates. A dominant negative otx2-engrailed repressor fusion protein (otx2-En) ablates endogenous cement gland formation, and inhibits expression of the mid/hindbrain boundary marker engrailed-2. Ectoderm expressing otx2-En is not able to respond to signals from the mesoderm to form cement gland, and is impaired in its ability to form anterior neural tissue. These results compliment analyses in otx2 mutant mice, indicating a role for otx2 in the ectoderm during anterior neural patterning.     

Mesoderm induction in the future tail region of Xenopus

Summary We have used interspecific grafts between Xenopus borealis and Xenopus laevis to study the signalling system that produces tail mesoderm. Early gastrula ectoderm grafted into the posterior neural plate region of neurulae responds to a mesodermal inducing signal in this region and forms mainly tail somites; this signal persists until at least the early tail bud stage. Ventral ectoderm grafted into the posterior neural plate loses its competence to respond to this signal after stage 10 1/2. We have established the specification of anterior and posterior neural plate ectoderm. In ectodermal sandwiches or when grafted into unusual positions, anterior regions gave rise to mainly nervous system and posterior regions to large amounts of muscle, together with some nervous system. Thus it was impossible to assess the competence of posterior neural plate ectoderm to form further mesoderm and hence to establish if mesodermal induction continues during neurulation in unmanipulated embryos.     

Xenopus laevis POU91 protein, an Oct3/4 homologue, regulates competence transitions from mesoderm to neural cell fates

Cellular competence is defined as a cell's ability to respond to signaling cues as a function of time. In Xenopus laevis, cellular responsiveness to fibroblast growth factor (FGF) changes during development. At blastula stages, FGF induces mesoderm, but at gastrula stages FGF regulates neuroectoderm formation. A Xenopus Oct3/4 homologue gene, XLPOU91, regulates mesoderm to neuroectoderm transitions. Ectopic XLPOU91 expression in Xenopus embryos inhibits FGF induction of Brachyury (Xbra), eliminating mesoderm, whereas neural induction is unaffected. XLPOU91 knockdown induces high levels of Xbra expression, with blastopore closure being delayed to later neurula stages. In morphant ectoderm explants, mesoderm responsiveness to FGF is extended from blastula to gastrula stages. The initial expression of mesoderm and endoderm markers is normal, but neural induction is abolished. Churchill (chch) and Sip1, two genes regulating neural competence, are not expressed in XLPOU91 morphant embryos. Ectopic Sip1 or chch expression rescues the morphant phenotype. Thus, XLPOU91 epistatically lies upstream of chch/Sip1 gene expression, regulating the competence transition that is critical for neural induction. In the absence of XLPOU91 activity, the cues driving proper embryonic cell fates are lost.     

Surface ectoderm is necessary for the morphogenesis of somites

The paraxial mesoderm of the neck and trunk of mouse embryos undergoes extensive morphogenesis in forming somites. Paraxial mesoderm is divided into segments, it elongates along its anterior posterior axis, and its cells organize into epithelia. Experiments were performed to determine if these processes are autonomous to the mesoderm that gives rise to the somites. Presomitic mesoderm at the tailbud stage was cultured in the presence and absence of its adjacent tissues. Somite segmentation occurred in the absence of neural tube, notochord, gut and surface ectoderm, and occurred in posterior fragments in the absence of anterior presomitic mesoderm. Mesodermal expression of Dll1 and Notch1, genes with roles in segmentation, was largely independent of other tissues, consistent with autonomous segmentation. However, surface ectoderm was found to be necessary for elongation of the mesoderm along the anterior-posterior axis and for somite epithelialization. To determine if there is specificity in the interaction between ectoderm and mesoderm, ectoderm from different sources was recombined with presomitic mesoderm. Surface ectoderm from only certain parts of the embryo supported somite epithelialization and elongation. Somite epithelialization induced by ectoderm was correlated with expression of the basic-helix-loop-helix gene Paraxis in the mesoderm. This is consistent with the genetically defined requirement for Paraxis in somite epithelialization. However, trunk ectoderm was able to induce somite epithelialization in the absence of strong Paraxis expression. We conclude that somitogenesis consists of autonomous segmentation patterned by Notch signaling and nonautonomous induction of elongation and epithelialization by surface ectoderm.     

FGF signaling and the anterior neural induction in Xenopus

We previously showed that FGF was capable of inducing Xenopus gastrula ectoderm cells in culture to express position-specific neural markers along the anteroposterior axis in a dose-dependent manner. However, conflicting results have been obtained concerning involvement of FGF signaling in the anterior neural induction in vivo using the same dominant-negative construct of Xenopus FGF receptor type-1 (delta XFGFR-1 or XFD). We explored this issue by employing a similar construct of receptor type-4a (XFGFR-4a) in addition, since expression of XFGFR-4a was seen to peak between gastrula and neurula stages, when the neural induction and patterning take place, whereas expression of XFGFR-1 had not a distinct peak during that period. Further, these two FGFRs are most distantly related in amino acid sequence in the Xenopus FGFR family. When we injected mRNA of a dominant-negative version of XFGFR-4a (delta XFGFR-4a) into eight animal pole blastomeres at 32-cell stage, anterior defects including loss of normal structure in telencephalon and eye regions became prominent as examined morphologically or by in situ hybridization. Overexpression of delta XFGFR-1 appeared far less effective than that of delta XFGFR-4a. Requirement of FGF signaling in ectoderm for anterior neural development was further confirmed in culture: when ectoderm cells that were overexpressing delta XFGFR-4a were cocultured with intact organizer cells from either early or late gastrula embryos, expression of anterior and posterior neural markers was inhibited, respectively. We also showed that autonomous neuralization of the anterior-type observed in ectoderm cells that were subjected to prolonged dissociation was strongly suppressed by delta XFGFR-4a, but not as much by delta XFGFR-1. It is thus indicated that FGF signaling in ectoderm, mainly through XFGFR-4, is required for the anterior neural induction by organizer. We may reconcile our data to the current "neural default model," which features the central roles of BMP4 signaling in ectoderm and BMP4 antagonists from organizer, simply postulating that the neural default pathway in ectoderm includes constitutive FGF signaling step.     

Homeogenetic neural induction in Xenopus

Neural induction is known to involve an interaction of ectoderm with dorsal mesoderm during gastrulation, but several kinds of studies have argued that competent ectoderm can also be neutralized via an interaction with previously neuralized tissue, a process termed homeogenetic neural induction. Although homeogenetic neural induction has been proposed to play an important role in the normal induction of neural tissue, this process has not been subjected to detailed study using tissue recombinants and molecular markers. We have examined the question of homeogenetic neural induction in Xenopus embryos, both in transplant and recombinant experiments, using the expression of two neural antigens to assay the response. When ectoderm that is competent to be neuralized is transplanted to the region adjacent to the neural plate of early neurula embryos, it forms neural tissue, as assayed by staining with antibodies against the neural cell adhesion molecule, N-CAM. Transplants to the ventral region, far from the neural plate, do not express N-CAM, indicating that neuralization is not occurring as a result of the transplantation procedure itself. Because this response might be occurring as a result of interactions of ectoderm with either adjacent neural plate tissue, or with underlying dorsolateral mesoderm, recombinant experiments were performed to determine the source of the neuralizing signal. Ectoderm cultured in combination with neural plate tissue alone expresses neural markers, while ectoderm cultured in combination with dorsolateral mesoderm does not. We conclude that neural tissue can homeogenetically induce competent ectoderm to form neural tissue and argue that this induction occurs via planar signaling within the ectoderm, a mechanism that, in normal development, may be involved in interactions within presumptive neural ectoderm or in specifying structures that lie near the neural plate.     

Role of BMP-4 in the inducing ability of the head organizer in Xenopus laevis

BMP-4 has been implicated in the patterning of the Dorsal-Ventral axis of mesoderm and ectoderm. In this study, we describe the posteriorizing effect of BMP-4 on the neural inducing ability of dorsal mesoderm (dorsal lip region) in Xenopus gastrulae. Dorsal lip explants dissected from stage 10.25 embryos retained anterior inducing ability when precultured for 6 hrs until sibling embryos reach stage 12. When the dorsal lips from stage 10.25 embryos were treated with a range of BMP-4 concentrations, posterior tissues were induced in adjacent ectoderm in a dose-dependent manner. Thus activin-treated explants able to act as head inducers can also induce posterior structures in the presence of BMP-4. To investigate whether BMP-4 directly affects the inducing ability of dorsal mesoderm, we blocked the BMP-4 signaling pathway by injection of mRNA encoding a truncated form of the BMP-4 receptor (tBR) mRNA. Under these conditions, activin-treated explants induced anterior tissues following BMP-4 treatment. Taken together, these results indicate that BMP-4 may affect the head inducing ability of dorsal mesoderm and confer trunk-tail inducing ability during Xenopus gastrulation.     

The cerberus-related gene, Cerr1, is not essential for mouse head formation

The Xenopus cerberus gene encodes a secreted factor expressed in the Spemann organizer that can cause ectopic head formation when its mRNA is injected into Xenopus embryos. In mouse, the cerberus-related gene, Cerr1, is expressed in the anterior mesendoderm that underlies the presumptive anterior neural plate and its expression is downregulated in Lim1 headless embryos. To determine whether Cerr1 is required for head formation we generated a null mutation in Cerr1 by gene targeting in mouse embryonic stem cells. We found that head formation is normal in Cerr1(-/-) embryos and we detected no obvious phenotypic defects in adult Cerr1(-/-) mice. However, in embryonic tissue layer recombination assays, Cerr1(-/-) presomitic/somitic mesoderm, unlike Cerr1-expressing wild-type presomitic/somitic mesoderm, was unable to maintain expression of the anterior neural marker gene Otx2 in ectoderm explants. These findings suggest that establishment of anterior identity in the mouse may involve the action of multiple functionally redundant factors.     

A novel homeobox gene expressed in the anterior neural plate of the Xenopus embryo.

To obtain gene sequences controlling the early steps of amphibian neurogenesis, we have performed differential screening of a subtractive cDNA library prepared by a novel PCR-based method from a single presumptive neural plate of a Xenopus laevis late-gastrula embryo. As a result we have isolated a fragment of a novel homeobox gene (named XANF-1, for Xenopus anterior neural folds). This gene is expressed predominantly in the anterior part of the developing nervous system. Such preferential localization of XANF-1 mRNA is established from its initially homogenous distribution in ectoderm of early gastrula. This change in the expression pattern is conditioned by a differential influence of various mesoderm regions on ectoderm: anterior mesoderm activates XANF-1 expression in the overlying ectoderm, whereas posterior axial and ventral mesoderm areas inhibit it. The data obtained demonstrate for the first time that selection of genes for specific expression in the CNS of the early vertebrate embryo is affected not only by chordamesoderm (a neural inductor) but also by ventral mesoderm.     

Msx1 and Msx2 have shared essential functions in neural crest but may be dispensable in epidermis and axis formation in Xenopus

The homeodomain factors Msx1 and Msx2 are expressed in essentially identical patterns in the epidermis and neural crest of Xenopus embryos during neurula stages. Disruption of Msx1 and Msx2 RNA splicing with antisense morpholino oligonucleotides shows that both factors are also required for expression of the neural crest gene Slug. Loss of Msx1 can be compensated by overexpression of Msx2 and vice versa. Loss of Msx factors also leads to alterations in the expression boundaries for neural and epidermal genes, but does not prevent or reduce expression of epidermal keratin in ventrolateral ectoderm, nor is there a detectable effect on dorsal mesodermal marker gene expression. These results indicate that Msx1 and Msx2 are both essential for neural crest development, but that the two genes have the same function in this tissue. If Msx genes have important functions in epidermis or axial mesoderm induction, these functions must be shared with other regulatory proteins.