Phylogeny of Dinoflagellate Plastid Genes Recently Transferred to the Nucleus Supports a Common Ancestry with Red Algal Plastid Genes

It is generally accepted that peridinin-containing dinoflagellate plastids are derived from red alga, but whether they are secondary plastids equivalent to plastids of stramenopiles, haptophytes, or cryptophytes, or are tertiary plastids derived from one of the other secondary plastids, has not yet been completely resolved. As secondary plastids, plastid gene phylogeny should mirror that of nuclear genes, while incongruence in the two phylogenies should be anticipated if their origin was as tertiary plastids. We have analyzed the phylogeny of plastid-encoded genes from Lingulodinium as well as that of nuclear-encoded dinoflagellate homologues of plastid-encoded genes conserved in all other plastid genome sequences. Our analyses place the dinoflagellate, stramenopile, haptophyte, and cryptophyte plastids firmly in the red algal lineage, and in particular, the close relationship between stramenopile plastid genes and their dinoflagellate nuclear-encoded homologues is consistent with the hypothesis that red algal-type plastids have arisen only once in evolution.     

DOES DINOPHYSIS CAUDATA (DINOPHYCEAE) HAVE PERMANENT PLASTIDS?1

The marine photosynthetic dinoflagellates Dinophysis Ehrenb. species are obligate mixotrophs that require both light and the ciliate prey Myrionecta rubra (= Mesodinium rubrum) for long‐term survival. Despite rapid progress on the study of Dinophysis using laboratory cultures, however, whether it has its own permanent plastids or kleptoplastids (i.e., stolen plastids from its ciliate prey) is not fully resolved. Here, we addressed this issue using established cultures of D. caudata Saville‐Kent strain DC‐LOHABE01 and cross‐feeding/starvation experiments encompassing the prey M. rubra strain MR‐MAL01 cultures grown on two different cryptophytes (strains CR‐MAL01 and CR‐MAL11). To follow the fate of prey plastids, psbA gene as a tracer was amplified from individually isolated D. caudata cells, and the PCR products were digested with a restriction enzyme, SfaNI. The RFLP pattern of the PCR products digested by SfaNI revealed that D. caudata continued to keep CR‐MAL01–type plastids, while it lost CR‐MAL11–type plastids with increasing starvation time. Our results suggest that Dinophysis treats in different ways plastids taken up from different cryptophytes via its ciliate prey M. rubra. Alternatively, D. caudata may already have its own CR‐MAL01–type permanent plastid, with two types of plastids (CR‐MAL01 and CR‐MAL11) obtained from M. rubra being lost within 1 month. This result highlights the need to identify more accurately the origin of plastids in newly isolated photosynthetic Dinophysis species to resolve the issue of plastid permanence.     

Anucleated cryptophyte vestiges in the gonyaulacalean dinoflagellates Amylax buxus and Amylax triacantha (Dinophyceae)

Cryptophyte vestiges showing selective digestion of nuclei were found in the gonyaulacalean dinoflagellates Amylax buxus (Balech) Dodge and Amylax triacantha (Jörgensen) Sournia. They emitted bright yellow‐orange fluorescence (590‐nm emission) under epifluorescent microscopy and possessed U‐shaped plastids, suggesting the vestiges were active in photosynthesis. Under transmission electron microscopy, the plastid was characterized by a loose arrangement of two to three thylakoid stacks and included a stalked pyrenoid, as in the cryptophyte genus Teleaulax. Indeed, molecular data based on the plastid small‐subunit rRNA gene demonstrated that the vestiges in Amylax originated from Teleaulax amphioxeia. The stolen plastid (kleptoplastids) in Dinophysis is also derived from this cryptophyte species. However, in sharp contrast to Dinophysis, the plastid of the vestige in Amylax was surrounded by a double layer of plastid endoplasmic reticulum, and within the periplastidal area, a nucleomorph was retained. The vestiges also possessed mitochondria with characteristic plate‐like cristae, but lost the cell‐surface structure. The phagocytotic membrane of the dinoflagellates seemed to surround the cryptophytes right after the incorporation, but the membrane itself would probably be digested eventually. Remarkably, only one cryptophyte cell among 14 vestiges in a cell of A. buxus had a nucleus. This is the first recording of possible kleptoplastidy in gonyaulacalean dinoflagellates, and documents the strategy of a dinoflagellate involving the selective elimination of the cryptophyte nucleus.     

Relationships between occurrences of toxic Dinophysis species (Dinophyceae) and small phytoplanktons in Japanese coastal waters

Fluctuations of the genus Dinophysis, which contained several toxic species of diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP), were investigated during blooms in Hiroshima Bay, Mutsu Bay and Ise Bay, Japan. The co-occurrences of small phytoplanktons (cryptophytes, other nanophytoplanktons, cyanobacteria and eukaryotic picophytoplanktons) were investigated to search for relationships with mixotrophic Dinophysis. Cryptophytes were divided into three size-groups based on length of their chloroplasts (>10, 5–10 and <5 μm) during counting by epifluorescence microscopy. Clear relationships were not found between the occurrences of Dinophysis spp. and nanophytoplanktons, cyanobacteria and eukaryotic picophytoplanktons. However, the fluctuations of small-sized cryptophytes (<5 μm) showed a close relationship with that of D. acuminata in Hiroshima Bay. In Mutsu Bay, small-sized cryptophytes also accompanied the first occurrence peak of Dinophysis spp. In Ise Bay, peaks of the occurrences of middle- and small-sized cryptophytes were observed 2–3 weeks before the peak of D. acuminata. These cryptophytes decreased rapidly with increase in D. acuminata. These results suggest the possibility that small-sized cryptophytes may be food organisms for mixotrophic Dinophysis, with the abundance of Dinophysis dependent on these cryptophytes.     

Plastid polarity and meiotic spindle development in microsporogenesis ofSelaginella

Summary Microsporogenesis inSelaginella was studied by fluorescence light microscopy and transmission electron microscopy. As in other examples of monoplastidic meiosis the plastids are involved in determination of division polarity and organization of microtubules. However, there are important differences: (1) the meiotic spindle develops from a unique prophase microtubule system associated with two plastids rather than from a typical quadripolar microtubule system associated with four plastids; (2) the division axes for first and second meiotic division are established sequentially, whereas as in all other cases the poles of second division are established before those of first division; and (3) the plastids remain in close contact with the nucleus throughout meiotic prophase and provide clues to the early determination of spindle orientation. In early prophase the single plastid divides in the plane of the future division and the two daughter plastids rotate apart until they lie on opposite sides of the nucleus. The procytokinetic plate (PCP) forms in association with the two slender plastids; it consists of two spindle-shaped microtubule arrays focused on the plastid tips with a plate of vesicles at the equatorial region and a picket row of microtubules around one side of the nucleus. Second plastid division occurs just before metaphase and the daughter plastids remain together at the spindle poles during first meiotic division. The meiotic spindle develops from merger of the component arrays of the PCP and additional microtubules emanating from the pair of plastid tips located at the poles. After inframeiotic interphase the plastids migrate to tetrahedral arrangement where they serve as poles of second division.Abbreviations AMS axial microtubule system - FITC fluorescein isothiocyanate - MTOC microtubule organizing center - PCP procytokinetic plate - QMS quadripolar microtubule system - TEM transmission electron microscope (microscopy)     

Plastid proteome prediction for diatoms and other algae with secondary plastids of the red lineage

The plastids of ecologically and economically important algae from phyla such as stramenopiles, dinoflagellates and cryptophytes were acquired via a secondary endosymbiosis and are surrounded by three or four membranes. Nuclear‐encoded plastid‐localized proteins contain N‐terminal bipartite targeting peptides with the conserved amino acid sequence motif ‘ASAFAP’. Here we identify the plastid proteomes of two diatoms, Thalassiosira pseudonana and Phaeodactylum tricornutum, using a customized prediction tool (ASAFind) that identifies nuclear‐encoded plastid proteins in algae with secondary plastids of the red lineage based on the output of SignalP and the identification of conserved ‘ASAFAP’ motifs and transit peptides. We tested ASAFind against a large reference dataset of diatom proteins with experimentally confirmed subcellular localization and found that the tool accurately identified plastid‐localized proteins with both high sensitivity and high specificity. To identify nucleus‐encoded plastid proteins of T. pseudonana and P. tricornutum we generated optimized sets of gene models for both whole genomes, to increase the percentage of full‐length proteins compared with previous assembly model sets. ASAFind applied to these optimized sets revealed that about 8% of the proteins encoded in their nuclear genomes were predicted to be plastid localized and therefore represent the putative plastid proteomes of these algae.     

Plastid genome sequence of the cryptophyte alga Rhodomonas salina CCMP1319: lateral transfer of putative DNA replication machinery and a test of chromist plastid phylogeny

Cryptophytes are a group of unicellular algae with chlorophyll c-containing plastids derived from the uptake of a secondary (i.e., eukaryotic) endosymbiont. Biochemical and molecular data indicate that cryptophyte plastids are derived from red algae, yet the question of whether or not cryptophytes acquired their red algal plastids independent of those in heterokont, haptophyte, and dinoflagellate algae is of long-standing debate. To better understand the origin and evolution of the cryptophyte plastid, we have sequenced the plastid genome of Rhodomonas salina CCMP1319: at 135,854 bp, it is the largest secondary plastid genome characterized thus far. It also possesses interesting features not seen in the distantly related cryptophyte Guillardia theta or in other red secondary plastids, including pseudogenes, introns, and a bacterial-derived gene for the tau/gamma subunit of DNA polymerase III (dnaX), the first time putative DNA replication machinery has been found encoded in any plastid genome. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that dnaX was acquired by lateral gene transfer (LGT) in an ancestor of Rhodomonas, most likely from a firmicute bacterium. A phylogenomic survey revealed no additional cases of LGT, beyond a noncyanobacterial type rpl36 gene similar to that recently characterized in other cryptophytes and haptophytes. Rigorous concatenated analysis of 45 proteins encoded in 15 complete plastid genomes produced trees in which the heterokont, haptophyte, and cryptophyte (i.e., chromist) plastids were monophyletic, and heterokonts and haptophytes were each other's closest relatives. However, statistical support for chromist monophyly disappears when amino acids are recoded according to their chemical properties in order to minimize the impact of composition bias, and a significant fraction of the concatenate appears consistent with a sister-group relationship between cryptophyte and haptophyte plastids.     

Plastid ultrastructure and photosynthesis in greening petaloid hypsophylls

The ultrastructural and biochemicalphysiological aspects of postfloral greening have been studied in hypsophylls of Heliconia aurantiaca Ghiesbr., Guzmania cf. x magnifica Richter and Spathiphyllum wallisii Regel. In all three species the greening of the hypsophylls is due to plastid transformation, chloroplast formation proceeding from the initially different types of plastids. The degradation process of the original plastid structures and the mode of thylakoid formation are distinct in each case. In none of the species do the transformed plastids look identical to the chloroplasts of the corresponding foliage leaves. On a chlorophyll basis, the rate of photosynthesis of the greened hypsophylls surpasses the rate of the leaves considerably in Spathiphyllum, but is much lower in Heliconia (no data for Guzmania). In all species, anatomy, plastid structure, pigments, 77° K-fluorescence emission, ribulose-1,5-bis-phosphate carboxylase activities and short-term photosynthesis ¹⁴CO₂-assimilation patterns prove the greened hypsophylls to be capable of providing additional carbon to the developing fruits, thus supplementing the import of organic matter from the foliage leaves.Abbreviations MDH malate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.37) - PEPCase phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (EC 4.1.1.31) - RuBPCase ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (EC 4.1.1.39)     

PHYLOGENETIC EVIDENCE FOR THE CRYPTOPHYTE ORIGIN OF THE PLASTID OF DINOPHYSIS (DINOPHYSIALES,DINOPHYCEAE)1

Photosynthetic members of the genus Dinophysis Ehrenberg contain a plastid of uncertain origin. Ultrastructure and pigment analyses suggest that the two‐membrane‐bound plastid of Dinophysis spp. has been acquired through endosymbiosis from a cryptophyte. However, these organisms do not survive in culture, raising the possibility that Dinophysis spp. have a transient kleptoplast. To test the origin and permanence of the plastid of Dinophysis, we sequenced plastid‐encoded psbA and small subunit rDNA from single‐cell isolates of D. acuminata Claparède et Lachman, D. acuta Ehrenberg, and D. norvegica Claparède et Lachman. Phylogenetic analyses confirm the cryptophyte origin of the plastid. Plastid sequences from different populations isolated at different times are monophyletic with robust support and show limited polymorphism. DNA sequencing also revealed plastid sequences of florideophyte origin, indicating that Dinophysis may be feeding on red algae.     

The ultrastructural features and division of secondary plastids

Plastids in heterokonts, cryptophytes, haptophytes, dinoflagellates, chlorarachniophytes, euglenoids, and apicomplexan parasites derive from secondary symbiogenesis. These plastids are surrounded by one or two additional membranes covering the plastid-envelope double membranes. Consequently, nuclear-encoded plastid division proteins have to be targeted into the division site through the additional surrounding membranes. Electron microscopic observations suggest that the additional surrounding membranes are severed by mechanisms distinct from those for the division of the plastid envelope. In heterokonts, cryptophytes and haptophytes, the outermost surrounding membrane (epiplastid rough endoplasmic reticulum, EPrER) is studded with cytoplasmic ribosomes and connected to the rER and the outer nuclear envelope. In monoplastidic species belonging to these three groups, the EPrER and the outer nuclear envelope are directly connected to form a sac enclosing the plastid and the nucleus. This nuclear-plastid connection, referred to as the nucleus-plastid consortium (NPC), may be significant to ensure the transmission of the plastids during cell division. The plastid dividing-ring (PD-ring) is a conserved component of the division machinery for both primary and secondary plastids. Also, homologues of the bacterial cell division protein, FtsZ, may be involved in the division of secondary plastids as well as primary plastids, though in secondary plastids they have not yet been localized to the division site. It remains to be examined whether or not dynamin-like proteins and other protein components known to function in the division of primary plastids are used also in secondary plastids. The nearly completed sequencing of the nuclear genome of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana will give impetus to molecular and cell biological studies on the division of secondary plastids.     

The Complete Plastid Genome Sequence of the Haptophyte Emiliania huxleyi: a Comparison to Other Plastid Genomes

The complete nucleotide sequence of the plastid genome of thehaptophyte Emiliania huxleyi has been determined. E. huxleyiis the most abundant coccolithophorid and has a key role inthe carbon cycle. It is also implicated in the production ofdimethylsulphide (DMS), which is involved in cloud nucleationand may affect the global climate. Here, we report the plastidgenome sequence of this ecologically and economically importantspecies and compare its gene content and arrangement to otherknown plastid genomes. The genome is circular and consists of105,309 bp with an inverted repeat of 4,841 bp. In terms ofboth genome size and gene content E. huxleyi cpDNA is substantiallysmaller than any other from the red plastid lineage. The geneticinformation is densely packed, with 86.8% of the genome specifying110 identified protein-coding genes, 9 open reading frames,28 different tRNAs, and 3 rRNAs. A detailed comparison to otherplastid genomes, based on gene content, gene function, and genecluster analysis is discussed. These analyses suggest a closerelationship of the E. huxleyi cpDNA to the chlorophyll c-containingplastids from heterokonts and cryptophytes, and they supportthe origin of the chromophyte plastids from the red algal lineage.     

The Monophyletic Origin of the Peridinin‐, and Fucoxanthin‐Containing Dinoflagellate Plastid Through Tertiary Replacement

The dinoflagellates contain diverse plastids of uncertain origin. To determine the origin of the peridinin‐ and fucoxanthin‐containing dinoflagellate plastid, we sequenced the plastid‐encoded psaA, psbA, and rbcL genes from various red and dinoflagellate algae. The psbA gene phylogeny, which was made from a dataset of 15 dinoflagellates, 22 rhodophytes, five cryptophytes, seven haptophytes, seven stramenopiles, two chlorophytes, and a glaucophyte as the outgroup, supports monophyly of the peridinin‐, and fucoxanthin‐containing dinoflagellates, as a sister group to the haptophytes. The monophyletic relationship with the haptophytes is recovered in the psbA + psaA phylogeny, with stronger support. The rubisco tree utilized the ‘Form I’ red algal type of rbcL and included fucoxanthin‐containing dinoflagellates. The dinoflagellate + haptophyte sister relationship is also recovered in this analysis. Peridinium foliaceum is shown to group with the diatoms in all the phylogenies. Based on our analyses of plastid sequences, we postulate that: (1) the plastid of peridinin‐, and fucoxanthin‐containing dinoflagellates originated from a common ancestor; (2) the ancestral dinoflagellate acquired its plastid from a haptophyte though a tertiary plastid replacement; (3) ‘Form II’ rubisco replaced the ancestral rbcL after the divergence of the peridinin‐, and fucoxanthin‐containing dinoflagellates; and (4) we confirm that the plastid of P. foliaceum originated from a Stramenopiles endosymbiont.     

Fate of green plastids in Dinophysis caudata following ingestion of the benthic ciliate Mesodinium coatsi: Ultrastructure and psbA gene

Phototrophic Dinophysis species are known to acquire plastids of the cryptophyte Teleaulax amphioxeia through feeding on the ciliate Mesodinium rubrum or M. cf. rubrum. In addition, several molecular studies have detected plastid encoding genes of various algal taxa within field populations of Dinophysis species. The trophic pathway by which Dinophysis species acquire plastids from algae other than the cryptophyte genus Teleaulax, however, is unknown. In this study, we examined the fate of prey organelles and plastid genes obtained by Dinophysis caudata through ingestion of Mesodinium coatsi, a benthic ciliate that retains green plastids of Chroomonas sp. Transmission electron microscopy and molecular analysis revealed relatively rapid digestion of prey-derived plastids. Following digestion of M. coatsi, however, photodamaged D. caudata cells having olive-green rather than reddish-brown plastids were able to recover some of their original reddish-brown pigmentation. Results further suggest that plastid genes of various algal taxa detected in field populations of Dinophysis species may reflect prey diversity rather than sequestration of multiple plastid types. Ingestion and digestion of prey other than M. rubrum or M. cf. rubrum may also provide nutritional requirements needed to repair and perhaps maintain sequestered T. amphioxeia plastids.     

Stable Plastid Transformation in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Nicotiana benthamiana</Emphasis>

Plastids from Nicotiana benthamiana were transformed with the vector for dicistronic expression of two genes—aminoglycoside 3'-adenyltransferase (aadA) and green fluorescent protein (gfp)—in the plastids of Nicotiana tabacum. Transplastomic shoots exhibited green fluorescence under UV light. Transformation efficiencies were similar between species. Although the border sequence (trnI and trnA) for homologous recombination to transform the plastid genome of N. benthamiana was identical to that sequence of N. tabacum, the exception was a 9-bp addition in the intron of trnI. This indicated that the N. tabacum sequence used as a border region for recombination was sufficient to insert the foreign gene into the target site between the trnI and trnA of N. benthamiana with similar efficiency. Southern blot analysis detected the presence of aadA and gfp between trnI and trnA in the plastid genome of N. benthamiana. Northern and western blot analyses revealed high expression of gfp in the plastids from petals and leaves. Our results suggest that the plastid transformation system established here is applicable to investigations of the interactions between plastid and nucleus in N. benthamiana.     

Plastid changes during the conversion of chloroplasts to chromoplasts in ripening tomatoes

Methods were developed for the isolation of plastids from mature green and ripening tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) and purification by sucrose or Percoll density-gradient centrifugation. Assessment of the purity of preparations involved phase-contrast and electron microscopy, assays for marker enzymes and RNA extraction and analysis. Proteins were extracted from isolated plastids at different ripening stages and separated by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The profiles obtained from chloroplasts and chromoplasts showed many qualitative and quantitative differences. Labelling of proteins with [³⁵S]methionine in vivo showed that there was active protein synthesis throughout ripening, but there was a change in the plastid proteins made as ripening proceeded. The cellular location of synthesis of specific proteins has yet to be established.Abbreviations CS citrate synthase - EDTA ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid,-acetate - GAPDH NADP⁺-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase - rRNA ribosomal RNA - SDS sodium dodecyl sulphate - SDS-PAGE SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis - Tris 2-amino-2(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol     

A Phylogenetic Assessment of the Eukaryotic Light-Harvesting Antenna Proteins, with Implications for Plastid Evolution

The light-harvesting complexes (LHCs) are a superfamily of chlorophyll-binding proteins present in all photosynthetic eukaryotes. The Lhc genes are nuclear-encoded, yet the pigment–protein complexes are localized to the thylakoid membrane and provide a marker to follow the evolutionary paths of plastids with different pigmentation. The LHCs are divided into the chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins of the green algae, euglenoids, and higher plants and the chlorophyll a/c-binding proteins of various algal taxa. This work examines the phylogenetic position of the LHCs from three additional taxa: the rhodophytes, the cryptophytes, and the chlorarachniophytes. Phylogenetic analysis of the LHC sequences provides strong statistical support for the clustering of the rhodophyte and cryptomonad LHC sequences within the chlorophyll a/c-binding protein lineage, which includes the fucoxanthin–chlorophyll proteins (FCP) of the heterokonts and the intrinsic peridinin–chlorophyll proteins (iPCP) of the dinoflagellates. These associations suggest that plastids from the heterokonts, haptophytes, cryptomonads, and the dinoflagellate, Amphidinium, evolved from a red algal-like ancestor. The Chlorarachnion LHC is part of the chlorophyll a/b-binding protein assemblage, consistent with pigmentation, providing further evidence that its plastid evolved from a green algal secondary endosymbiosis. The Chlorarachnion LHC sequences cluster with the green algal LHCs that are predominantly associated with photosystem II (LHCII). This suggests that the green algal endosymbiont that evolved into the Chlorarachnion plastid was acquired following the emergence of distinct LHCI and LHCII complexes. Received: 25 February 1998 / Accepted: 13 May 1998     

Trafficking of Proteins through Plastid Stromules

Stromules are thin projections from plastids that are generally longer and more abundant on non-green plastids than on chloroplasts. Occasionally stromules can be observed to connect two plastid bodies with one another. However, photobleaching of GFP-labeled plastids and stromules in 2000 demonstrated that plastids do not form a network like the endoplasmic reticulum, resulting in the proposal that stromules have major functions other than transfer of material from one plastid to another. The absence of a network was confirmed in 2012 with the use of a photoconvertible fluorescent protein, but the prior observations of movement of proteins between plastids were challenged. We review published evidence and provide new experiments that demonstrate trafficking of fluorescent protein between plastids as well as movement of proteins within stromules that emanate from a single plastid and discuss the possible function of stromules.Projections from chloroplasts have been reported sporadically in the literature for over a hundred years (reviewed in Gray et al., 2001; Kwok and Hanson, 2004a) and became established as genuine features of plastids when they were observed by the targeting of green fluorescent protein (GFP) to the stromal compartment (Köhler et al., 1997). This study showed that these projections sometimes appeared to connect discrete plastid bodies, and photobleaching experiments demonstrated flow of GFP from one plastid body to another. After GFP in one plastid body was bleached, fluorescence rapidly recovered as a result of flow from GFP from the unbleached plastids. By continuous bleaching of a stromule connecting two plastids, fluorescence was lost from both plastids. This led to the speculation that there could be an interplastid communication system (Köhler et al., 1997). In a follow-up study to test the degree of interplastid connectedness, the term “stromule” was coined to prevent confusion with other tubular structures in the cell (Köhler and Hanson, 2000). The existence of a stromule-based plastid network was ruled out by these experiments, but movement of protein through stromules was confirmed, and it was proposed that stromules might function to facilitate transport of substances in and out of the plastid by increasing surface area and by placing the plastid compartment in close proximity to other organelles or subcellular structures (Köhler and Hanson, 2000). A study by Schattat et al. (2012) confirmed the absence of a plastid network with the use of a photoconvertible fluorescent protein. These authors also describe photoconversion experiments that appear to contradict our prior work demonstrating flow of GFP between two plastid bodies connected by a stromule. Here, we confirm our prior fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) results, showing that proteins can move through stromules between individual plastids, and we demonstrate that a red photoconverted protein can also move into a region where photoconversion has not occurred, provided that potentially damaging levels of light are not used during the photoconversion experiment. We review previous studies showing the lack of an interconnected plastid network and consider other functions for stromules, such as facilitating the transport of enzymes and metabolites to and from the plastid to the vicinity of other organelles or regions of the cell.     

Diversity and plastid types in Dinophysis acuminata complex (Dinophyceae) in Scottish waters

Dinophysis acuminata produces lipophilic shellfish toxins (LSTs) that have economic and ecological impact on marine invertebrates in NE Atlantic where aquaculture farming is prevalent. Identification of D. acuminata can be complex. Cells exhibit a variety of morphotypes that overlap between species making identification using routine light microscopy difficult. These cells are mixotrophic and their population size is influenced by hydrographic conditions and prey populations. Dinophysis cells are able to acquire and temporarily keep prey plastids from a variety of photosynthetic unicellular sources. The Dinophysis community in Scottish waters tend to be dominated by cells with morphologies that appear to be variants of D. acuminata/norvegica complex particularly during late spring/early summer. To determine the identity of these morphotypes, DNA barcoding was performed on 32 single cell isolates from sites around the Scottish coast using the ribosomal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) and a partial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) fragment on the same single cells. Although the cells exhibited a variety of morphotypes, most were restricted to one cluster containing D. acuminata and three grouped with Dinophysis ovum. This is the first molecular confirmation of the presence of D. ovum in Scottish waters. Two isolates showed considerable divergence – one was unidentifiable from the public databases, whilst the other matched a Dinophysis cf. acuta isolate from Canada. To investigate prey plastids, molecular analysis of these Dinophysis single cells was conducted with a partial fragment of the plastid ribosomal marker (16S). Most cells harboured plastids from the cryptophyte Teleaulax – the most commonly reported plastid type, however one cell harboured a Rhodomonas/Storeatula derived plastid. This finding increases the range and variety of cryptophyte plastids found in Dinophysis and increases the range of prey-types.