CELLULOSE SYNTHASE INTERACTIVE1 Is Required for Fast Recycling of Cellulose Synthase Complexes to the Plasma Membrane in Arabidopsis

Plants are constantly subjected to various biotic and abiotic stresses and have evolved complex strategies to cope with these stresses. For example, plant cells endocytose plasma membrane material under stress and subsequently recycle it back when the stress conditions are relieved. Cellulose biosynthesis is a tightly regulated process that is performed by plasma membrane-localized cellulose synthase (CESA) complexes (CSCs). However, the regulatory mechanism of cellulose biosynthesis under abiotic stress has not been well explored. In this study, we show that small CESA compartments (SmaCCs) or microtubule-associated cellulose synthase compartments (MASCs) are critical for fast recovery of CSCs to the plasma membrane after stress is relieved in Arabidopsis thaliana. This SmaCC/MASC-mediated fast recovery of CSCs is dependent on CELLULOSE SYNTHASE INTERACTIVE1 (CSI1), a protein previously known to represent the link between CSCs and cortical microtubules. Independently, AP2M, a core component in clathrin-mediated endocytosis, plays a role in the formation of SmaCCs/MASCs. Together, our study establishes a model in which CSI1-dependent SmaCCs/MASCs are formed through a process that involves endocytosis, which represents an important mechanism for plants to quickly regulate cellulose synthesis under abiotic stress.     

CELLULOSE SYNTHASE INTERACTIVE3 Regulates Cellulose Biosynthesis in Both a Microtubule-Dependent and Microtubule-Independent Manner in Arabidopsis

Anisotropic plant cell growth depends on the coordination between the orientation of cortical microtubules and the orientation of nascent cellulose microfibrils. CELLULOSE SYNTHASE INTERACTIVE1 (CSI1) is a key scaffold protein that guides primary cellulose synthase complexes (CSCs) along cortical microtubules during cellulose biosynthesis. Here, we investigated the function of the CSI1-like protein, CSI3, in Arabidopsis thaliana. Similar to CSI1, CSI3 associates with primary CSCs in vitro, colocalizes with CSCs in vivo, and exhibits the same plasma membrane localization and bidirectional motility as CSI1. However, ProCSI1:GFP-CSI3 cannot complement the anisotropic cell growth defect in csi1 mutants, suggesting that CSI3 is not functionally equivalent to CSI1. Also, the colocalization ratio between CSI1 and CSI3 is low, which may suggest heterogeneity within the CSC population. csi1 csi3 double mutants showed an enhanced cell expansion defect as well as an additive reduction of CSC velocities, and CSI3 dynamics are dependent on CSI1 function. We propose that CSI3 is an important regulator of plant cellulose biosynthesis and plant anisotropic cell growth that modulates the velocity of CSCs in both a microtubule-dependent and microtubule-independent manner.     

The Arabidopsis Cellulose Synthase Complex: A Proposed Hexamer of CESA Trimers in an Equimolar Stoichiometry

Cellulose is the most abundant renewable polymer on Earth and a major component of the plant cell wall. In vascular plants, cellulose synthesis is catalyzed by a large, plasma membrane-localized cellulose synthase complex (CSC), visualized as a hexameric rosette structure. Three unique cellulose synthase (CESA) isoforms are required for CSC assembly and function. However, elucidation of either the number or stoichiometry of CESAs within the CSC has remained elusive. In this study, we show a 1:1:1 stoichiometry between the three Arabidopsis thaliana secondary cell wall isozymes: CESA4, CESA7, and CESA8. This ratio was determined utilizing a simple but elegant method of quantitative immunoblotting using isoform-specific antibodies and ³⁵S-labeled protein standards for each CESA. Additionally, the observed equimolar stoichiometry was found to be fixed along the axis of the stem, which represents a developmental gradient. Our results complement recent spectroscopic analyses pointing toward an 18-chain cellulose microfibril. Taken together, we propose that the CSC is composed of a hexamer of catalytically active CESA trimers, with each CESA in equimolar amounts. This finding is a crucial advance in understanding how CESAs integrate to form higher order complexes, which is a key determinate of cellulose microfibril and cell wall properties.     

A Structural Study of CESA1 Catalytic Domain of Arabidopsis Cellulose Synthesis Complex: Evidence for CESA Trimers

A cellulose synthesis complex with a “rosette” shape is responsible for synthesis of cellulose chains and their assembly into microfibrils within the cell walls of land plants and their charophyte algal progenitors. The number of cellulose synthase proteins in this large multisubunit transmembrane protein complex and the number of cellulose chains in a microfibril have been debated for many years. This work reports a low resolution structure of the catalytic domain of CESA1 from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; AtCESA1CatD) determined by small-angle scattering techniques and provides the first experimental evidence for the self-assembly of CESA into a stable trimer in solution. The catalytic domain was overexpressed in Escherichia coli, and using a two-step procedure, it was possible to isolate monomeric and trimeric forms of AtCESA1CatD. The conformation of monomeric and trimeric AtCESA1CatD proteins were studied using small-angle neutron scattering and small-angle x-ray scattering. A series of AtCESA1CatD trimer computational models were compared with the small-angle x-ray scattering trimer profile to explore the possible arrangement of the monomers in the trimers. Several candidate trimers were identified with monomers oriented such that the newly synthesized cellulose chains project toward the cell membrane. In these models, the class-specific region is found at the periphery of the complex, and the plant-conserved region forms the base of the trimer. This study strongly supports the “hexamer of trimers” model for the rosette cellulose synthesis complex that synthesizes an 18-chain cellulose microfibril as its fundamental product.Cellulose, the most abundant biopolymer on Earth, is composed of linear chains of β-1,4 linked d-Glc monomers with repeating structural units of the disaccharide cellobiose. Numerous cellulose polymers cocrystallize to form microfibrils, which provide mechanical strength and rigidity to plants. Its natural abundance makes it an attractive target for many industrial applications, including paper and pulping, construction, and textile manufacture. More recently, cellulose has been used for production of biofuels, such as ethanol (Ragauskas et al., 2006; Langan et al., 2014), and in the form of nanocellulose as a component in advanced composite materials (Reddy et al., 2013; Habibi, 2014). Cellulose microfibrils are synthesized by a large membrane-bound protein complex. In the land plants and charophycean algae, the cellulose synthesis complex (CSC) has a “rosette” shape (Mueller et al., 1976; Mueller and Brown, 1980b; Kimura et al., 1999), and the entire CSC has reported diameters between 24 to 30 nm (Lerouxel et al., 2006). This structural information was revealed by freeze-fracture transmission electron microscopy, showing six lobes in a hexagonal arrangement at the point where the transmembrane helices of multiple cellulose synthase proteins (CESAs) cross the plasma membrane. Recently KORRIGAN, a protein with cellulase activity, has also been implicated as an integral component of the CSC (Vain et al., 2014).Vascular plants produce several different CESA isoforms. For example, Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) has 10 different isoforms with 64% to 98% sequence identity (Holland et al., 2000; Richmond, 2000; McFarlane et al., 2014). The different CESA isoforms play specific roles in cellulose synthesis during plant development. In Arabidopsis, CESA1, CESA3, and CESA6 are required for primary cell wall synthesis, while CESA4, CESA7, and CESA8 are required for secondary cell wall synthesis (Gardiner et al., 2003; Taylor et al., 2003; Persson et al., 2007). CESA2, CESA5, and CESA9 play roles in tissue-specific processes and are partially redundant with CESA6, whereas CESA10 is closely related to AtCESA1 but evidently has a minor role in plant development (Somerville, 2006). The absolute number of CESA proteins present in a CSC remains a subject of much speculation, largely because the stoichiometry of the cellulose microfibril remains unresolved (Cosgrove, 2014). The traditional representation of the microfibril has 36 cellulose chains, and based on this, one would expect that each lobe of the rosette CSC contains six CESA proteins responsible for the synthesis of six glucan chains for a total of 36 CESA proteins per rosette CSC (Herth, 1983; Perrin, 2001; Doblin et al., 2002). However, recent studies using different analytical techniques combined with computation report 18 to 24 cellulose chains per microfibril (Fernandes et al., 2011; Thomas et al., 2013; Oehme et al., 2015). A study of cellulose from mung bean (Vigna radiata) primary cell walls, using x-ray diffraction, solid-state NMR, and computational analysis, supports an 18-chain model for a cellulose microfibril (Newman et al., 2013). This implies that the CSC is composed of fewer than 36 CESA proteins or that not all of the proteins in a CSC are simultaneously active. Further, it has been recently reported that the stoichiometry of CESAs 1, 3, and 6 and CESAs 4, 7, and 8 in the primary and secondary cell walls, respectively, is 1:1:1 (Gonneau et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2014). Together, these reports suggest a rosette CSC composed of 18 CESA proteins with three CESAs per lobe as the most likely composition of a rosette CSC to account for an 18-chain cellulose microfibril (Newman et al., 2013; Gonneau et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2014). In addition, it should also be noted that 24 CESA proteins in a rosette CSC with four proteins per lobe is incompatible with a 1:1:1 CESA stoichiometry.Numerous efforts to isolate active CESA proteins directly from plants or by recombinant expression have not been successful, preventing a detailed structural analysis of CESA proteins or the mechanism of plant cellulose synthesis. In contrast, the recently reported crystal structure of cellulose synthase from Rhodoobacter sphaeroides (Morgan et al., 2013) clearly showed that only a single cellulose synthase polypeptide is required for glucan polymerization and also identified the conserved sequence motifs responsible for catalysis. In addition, based on the presence of an 18-residue glucan chain in the protein tunnel, a mechanism for cellulose synthesis and translocation across a cytoplasmic membrane was proposed that also addressed how the alternate d-Glc molecules are inverted during polymer synthesis (Morgan et al., 2013; Omadjela et al., 2013). However, this structure cannot provide insight into the formation of microfibrils from the cellulose chains synthesized by single polypeptides of CESA.The CESA proteins of land plants and their charophycean algal relatives are multidomain single polypeptide chains of approximately 1000 amino acids. They are predicted to have eight transmembrane helices and to have their N- and C-terminal regions facing the cytoplasm (Pear et al., 1996). Although they share sequence similarity with the bacterial counterpart, they also have unique structural features not found in the bacterial enzymes. The N-terminal domain contains a Zn-binding site that may play a role in oligomerization of CESA proteins (Kurek et al., 2002). The putative cytosolic domain, which is flanked by a two-helix N-terminal transmembrane domain and a six-helix C-terminal transmembrane domain (McFarlane et al., 2014; Slabaugh et al., 2014), has D, D, D, QxxRW motifs that are conserved substrate binding and catalytic residues in the glycosyltransferase-2 superfamily (Nagahashi et al., 1995; Pear et al., 1996; Saxena and Brown, 1997; Yoshida et al., 2000). This domain also has a plant-conserved region (P-CR) and a class-specific region (CSR) that are only found in CESAs that form rosette CSCs. Although the roles of these regions are unknown, they are proposed to be involved in regulatory functions, such as interactions with other proteins and oligomerization to form the rosette shape. In the Arabidopsis CESAs, the sequence identity within the P-CR regions is greater than 80%, while in CSR regions, it is only about 40%. A recent computational model of the cytosolic domain of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) CESA1 provides the first detailed structural model of the catalytic domain of CESA (Sethaphong et al., 2013). This model structure aligns well with the crystal structure of the bacterial cellulose synthase, indicating that a common mechanism exists for cellulose synthesis in bacteria and plants and that CESAs within rosette CSCs contain a single active synthetic site. In addition, this model made it possible to test possible configurations for the assembly of CESA monomers into a functional rosette CSC (Newman et al., 2013; Sethaphong et al., 2013).Our understanding of the mechanism of cellulose biosynthesis in plants at the molecular level is hampered by the lack of an atomic level CESA model. To gain deeper insight into the structure and role of the catalytic domain of CESA in rosette formation, we carried out a structural characterization of the cytosolic domain of Arabidopsis CESA1, a protein that is essential for cellulose synthesis in the primary cell wall (Arioli et al., 1998). The recombinant protein was purified from Escherichia coli in a two-step process that allowed us to obtain low-resolution structural information about the monomeric and trimeric forms of the recombinant protein using small-angle scattering (SAS) techniques. This study provides the first experimental evidence to support the self-assembly of CESAs into a stable trimer complex, revealing the possible role of the catalytic domain in the formation of the rosette CSC. Comparison of the size of the catalytic domain trimer with dimensions of rosette CSCs obtained from TEM studies strongly supports the “hexamer of trimers” model for rosette CSCs. Computational analysis of the scattering data suggested configurations for how the monomers, including the plant-specific P-CR and CSR domains, may be arranged in the trimeric lobes of the rosette CSC. Knowledge of how CESA proteins assemble in the CSC will enable approaches for rational genetic manipulation of plant cell wall synthesis, which offers enormous opportunities to improve feedstocks for the production of sustainable fuels and chemicals.     

Xyloglucan Deficiency Disrupts Microtubule Stability and Cellulose Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis,Altering Cell Growth and Morphogenesis

Xyloglucan constitutes most of the hemicellulose in eudicot primary cell walls and functions in cell wall structure and mechanics. Although Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) xxt1 xxt2 mutants lacking detectable xyloglucan are viable, they display growth defects that are suggestive of alterations in wall integrity. To probe the mechanisms underlying these defects, we analyzed cellulose arrangement, microtubule patterning and dynamics, microtubule- and wall-integrity-related gene expression, and cellulose biosynthesis in xxt1 xxt2 plants. We found that cellulose is highly aligned in xxt1 xxt2 cell walls, that its three-dimensional distribution is altered, and that microtubule patterning and stability are aberrant in etiolated xxt1 xxt2 hypocotyls. We also found that the expression levels of microtubule-associated genes, such as MAP70-5 and CLASP, and receptor genes, such as HERK1 and WAK1, were changed in xxt1 xxt2 plants and that cellulose synthase motility is reduced in xxt1 xxt2 cells, corresponding with a reduction in cellulose content. Our results indicate that loss of xyloglucan affects both the stability of the microtubule cytoskeleton and the production and patterning of cellulose in primary cell walls. These findings establish, to our knowledge, new links between wall integrity, cytoskeletal dynamics, and wall synthesis in the regulation of plant morphogenesis.The primary walls of growing plant cells are largely constructed of cellulose and noncellulosic matrix polysaccharides that include hemicelluloses and pectins (Carpita and Gibeaut, 1993; Somerville et al., 2004; Cosgrove, 2005). Xyloglucan (XyG) is the most abundant hemicellulose in the primary walls of eudicots and is composed of a β-1,4-glucan backbone with side chains containing Xyl, Gal, and Fuc (Park and Cosgrove, 2015). XyG is synthesized in the Golgi apparatus before being secreted to the apoplast, and its biosynthesis requires several glycosyltransferases, including β-1,4-glucosyltransferase, α-1,6-xylosyltransferase, β-1,2-galactosyltransferase, and α-1,2-fucosyltransferase activities (Zabotina, 2012). Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) XYLOGLUCAN XYLOSYLTRANSFERASE1 (XXT1) and XXT2 display xylosyltransferase activity in vitro (Faik et al., 2002; Cavalier and Keegstra, 2006), and strikingly, no XyG is detectable in the walls of xxt1 xxt2 double mutants (Cavalier et al., 2008; Park and Cosgrove, 2012a), suggesting that the activity of XXT1 and XXT2 are required for XyG synthesis, delivery, and/or stability.Much attention has been paid to the interactions between cellulose and XyG over the past 40 years. Currently, there are several hypotheses concerning the nature of these interactions (Park and Cosgrove, 2015). One possibility is that XyGs bind directly to cellulose microfibrils (CMFs). Recent data indicating that crystalline cellulose cores are surrounded with hemicelluloses support this hypothesis (Dick-Pérez et al., 2011). It is also possible that XyG acts as a spacer-molecule to prevent CMFs from aggregating in cell walls (Anderson et al., 2010) or as an adapter to link cellulose with other cell wall components, such as pectin (Cosgrove, 2005; Cavalier et al., 2008). XyG can be covalently linked to pectin (Thompson and Fry, 2000; Popper and Fry, 2005, 2008), and NMR data demonstrate that pectins and cellulose might interact to a greater extent than XyG and cellulose in native walls (Dick-Pérez et al., 2011). Alternative models exist for how XyG-cellulose interactions influence primary wall architecture and mechanics. One such model posits that XyG chains act as load-bearing tethers that bind to CMFs in primary cell walls to form a cellulose-XyG network (Carpita and Gibeaut, 1993; Pauly et al., 1999; Somerville et al., 2004; Cosgrove, 2005). However, results have been accumulating against this tethered network model, leading to an alternative model in which CMFs make direct contact, in some cases mediated by a monolayer of xyloglucan, at limited cell wall sites dubbed “biomechanical hotspots,” which are envisioned as the key sites of cell wall loosening during cell growth (Park and Cosgrove, 2012a; Wang et al., 2013; Park and Cosgrove, 2015). Further molecular, biochemical, and microscopy experiments are required to help distinguish which aspects of the load-bearing, spacer/plasticizer, and/or hotspot models most accurately describe the functions of XyG in primary walls.Cortical microtubules (MTs) direct CMF deposition by guiding cellulose synthase complexes in the plasma membrane (Baskin et al., 2004; Paredez et al., 2006; Emons et al., 2007; Sánchez-Rodriguez et al., 2012), and the patterned deposition of cellulose in the wall in turn can help determine plant cell anisotropic growth and morphogenesis (Baskin, 2005). Disruption of cortical MTs by oryzalin, a MT-depolymerizing drug, alters the alignment of CMFs, suggesting that MTs contribute to CMF organization (Baskin et al., 2004). CELLULOSE SYNTHASE (CESA) genes, including CESA1, CESA3, and CESA6, are required for normal CMF synthesis in primary cell walls (Kohorn et al., 2006; Desprez et al., 2007), and accessory proteins such as COBRA function in cellulose production (Lally et al., 2001). Live-cell imaging from double-labeled YFP-CESA6; CFP-ALPHA-1 TUBULIN (TUA1) Arabidopsis seedlings provides direct evidence that cortical MTs determine the trajectories of cellulose synthesis complexes (CSCs) and patterns of cellulose deposition (Paredez et al., 2006). Additionally, MT organization affects the rotation of cellulose synthase trajectories in the epidermal cells of Arabidopsis hypocotyls (Chan et al., 2010). Recently, additional evidence for direct guidance of CSCs by MTs has been provided by the identification of CSI1/POM2, which binds to both MTs and CESAs (Bringmann et al., 2012; Li et al., 2012). MICROTUBULE ORGANIZATION1 (MOR1) is essential for cortical MT organization (Whittington et al., 2001), but disruption of cortical MTs in the mor1 mutant does not greatly affect CMF organization (Sugimoto et al., 2003), and oryzalin treatment does not abolish CSC motility (Paredez et al., 2006).Conversely, the organization of cortical MTs can be affected by cellulose synthesis. Treatment with isoxaben, a cellulose synthesis inhibitor, results in disorganized cortical MTs in tobacco cells, suggesting that inhibition of cellulose synthesis affects MT organization (Fisher and Cyr, 1998), and treatment with 2,6-dichlorobenzonitrile, another cellulose synthesis inhibitor, alters MT organization in mor1 plants (Himmelspach et al., 2003). Cortical MT orientation in Arabidopsis roots is also altered in two cellulose synthesis-deficient mutants, CESA6^52-isx and kor1-3, suggesting that CSC activity can affect MT arrays (Paredez et al., 2008). Together, these results point to a bidirectional relationship between cellulose synthesis/patterning and MT organization.MTs influence plant organ morphology, but the detailed mechanisms by which they do so are incompletely understood. The dynamics and stability of cortical MTs are also affected by MT-associated proteins (MAPs). MAP18 is a MT destabilizing protein that depolymerizes MTs (Wang et al., 2007), MAP65-1 functions as a MT crosslinker, and MAP70-1 functions in MT assembly (Korolev et al., 2005; Lucas et al., 2011). MAP70-5 stabilizes existing MTs to maintain their length, and its overexpression induces right-handed helical growth (Korolev et al., 2007); likewise, MAP20 overexpression results in helical cell twisting (Rajangam et al., 2008). CLASP promotes microtubule stability, and its mutant is hypersensitive to microtubule-destabilizing drug oryzalin (Ambrose et al., 2007). KATANIN1 (KTN1) is a MT-severing protein that can sever MTs into short fragments and promote the formation of thick MT bundles that ultimately depolymerize (Stoppin-Mellet et al., 2006), and loss of KTN1 function results in reduced responses to mechanical stress (Uyttewaal et al., 2012). In general, cortical MT orientation responds to mechanical signals and can be altered by applying force directly to the shoot apical meristem (Hamant et al., 2008). The application of external mechanical pressure to Arabidopsis leaves also triggers MT bundling (Jacques et al., 2013). Kinesins, including KINESIN-13A (KIN-13A) and FRAGILE FIBER1 (FRA1), have been implicated in cell wall synthesis (Cheung and Wu, 2011; Fujikura et al., 2014). The identification of cell wall receptors and sensors is beginning to reveal how plant cell walls sense and respond to external signals (Humphrey et al., 2007; Ringli, 2010); some of them, such as FEI1, FEI2, THESEUS1 (THE1), FERONIA (FER), HERCULES RECEPTOR KINASE1 (HERK1), WALL ASSOCIATED KINASE1 (WAK1), WAK2, and WAK4, have been characterized (Lally et al., 2001; Decreux and Messiaen, 2005; Kohorn et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2008; Guo et al., 2009; Cheung and Wu, 2011). However, the relationships between wall integrity, cytoskeletal dynamics, and wall synthesis have not yet been fully elucidated.In this study, we analyzed CMF patterning, MT patterning and dynamics, and cellulose biosynthesis in the Arabidopsis xxt1 xxt2 double mutant that lacks detectable XyG and displays altered growth (Cavalier et al., 2008; Park and Cosgrove, 2012a). To investigate whether and how XyG deficiency affects the organization of CMFs and cortical MTs, we observed CMF patterning in xxt1 xxt2 mutants and Col (wild-type) controls using atomic force microscopy (AFM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and confocal microscopy (Hodick and Kutschera, 1992; Derbyshire et al., 2007; Anderson et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2014). We also generated transgenic Col and xxt1 xxt2 lines expressing GFP-MAP4 (Marc et al., 1998) and GFP-CESA3 (Desprez et al., 2007), and analyzed MT arrays and cellulose synthesis using live-cell imaging. Our results show that the organization of CMFs is altered, that MTs in xxt1 xxt2 mutants are aberrantly organized and are more sensitive to external mechanical pressure and the MT-depolymerizing drug oryzalin, and that cellulose synthase motility and cellulose content are decreased in xxt1 xxt2 mutants. Furthermore, real-time quantitative RT-PCR measurements indicate that the enhanced sensitivity of cortical MTs to mechanical stress and oryzalin in xxt1 xxt2 plants might be due to altered expression of MT-stabilizing and wall receptor genes. Together, these data provide insights into the connections between the functions of XyG in wall assembly, the mechanical integrity of the cell wall, cytoskeleton-mediated cellular responses to deficiencies in wall biosynthesis, and cell and tissue morphogenesis.     

Arabidopsis CSN5B Interacts with VTC1 and Modulates Ascorbic Acid Synthesis

Light regulates ascorbic acid (AsA) synthesis, which increases in the light, presumably reflecting a need for antioxidants to detoxify reactive molecules produced during photosynthesis. Here, we examine this regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana and find that alterations in the protein levels of the AsA biosynthetic enzyme GDP-Man pyrophosphorylase (VTC1) are associated with changes in AsA contents in light and darkness. To find regulatory factors involved in AsA synthesis, we identified VTC1-interacting proteins by yeast two-hybrid screening of a cDNA library from etiolated seedlings. This screen identified the photomorphogenic factor COP9 signalosome subunit 5B (CSN5B), which interacted with the N terminus of VTC1 in yeast and plants. Gel filtration profiling showed that VTC1-CSN5B also associated with the COP9 signalosome complex, and this interaction promotes ubiquitination-dependent VTC1 degradation through the 26S proteasome pathway. Consistent with this, csn5b mutants showed very high AsA levels in both light and darkness. Also, a double mutant of csn5b with the partial loss-of-function mutant vtc1-1 contained AsA levels between those of vtc1-1 and csn5b, showing that CSN5B modulates AsA synthesis by affecting VTC1. In addition, the csn5b mutant showed higher tolerance to salt, indicating that CSN5B regulation of AsA synthesis affects the response to salt stress. Together, our data reveal a regulatory role of CSN5B in light-dark regulation of AsA synthesis.     

The Cellulase KORRIGAN Is Part of the Cellulose Synthase Complex

Plant growth and organ formation depend on the oriented deposition of load-bearing cellulose microfibrils in the cell wall. Cellulose is synthesized by a large relative molecular weight cellulose synthase complex (CSC), which comprises at least three distinct cellulose synthases. Cellulose synthesis in plants or bacteria also requires the activity of an endo-1,4-β-d-glucanase, the exact function of which in the synthesis process is not known. Here, we show, to our knowledge for the first time, that a leaky mutation in the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) membrane-bound endo-1,4-β-d-glucanase KORRIGAN1 (KOR1) not only caused reduced CSC movement in the plasma membrane but also a reduced cellulose synthesis inhibitor-induced accumulation of CSCs in intracellular compartments. This suggests a role for KOR1 both in the synthesis of cellulose microfibrils and in the intracellular trafficking of CSCs. Next, we used a multidisciplinary approach, including live cell imaging, gel filtration chromatography analysis, split ubiquitin assays in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae NMY51), and bimolecular fluorescence complementation, to show that, in contrast to previous observations, KOR1 is an integral part of the primary cell wall CSC in the plasma membrane.Cellulose microfibrils are synthesized by a hexameric multiprotein complex at the plasma membrane called the cellulose synthase complex (CSC). Genetic analysis, expression data, and coimmunoprecipitation experiments have demonstrated that a functional CSC contains at least three different nonredundant cellulose synthase (CESA) isoforms (Höfte et al., 2007). CESA1, CESA3, and CESA6-like are involved in cellulose biosynthesis during primary cell wall deposition, whereas CESA4, CESA7, and CESA8 are essential for cellulose synthesis in the secondary cell wall (Taylor et al., 1999, 2000, 2003; Desprez et al., 2007; Persson et al., 2007). CSCs labeled by fluorescently tagged CESA proteins migrate in the plasma membrane along cortical microtubules (CMTs), propelled by the polymerization of the β-1,4-glucans (Paredez et al., 2006). Partial depolymerization of CMTs using oryzalin showed that the organized trajectories of CSCs depend on the presence of an intact CMT array. The CSC-microtubule interaction is mediated at least in part by a large protein, POMPOM2/CELLULOSE SYNTHASE INTERACTING1, that binds to both CESAs and microtubules (Lei et al., 2014). Interestingly, complete depolymerization of CMTs does not alter the velocity of the complexes, illustrating that CMTs are necessary for the guidance of CSCs but not for their movement (Paredez et al., 2006). The microtubule cytoskeleton also has a role in the secretion and internalization of CSCs (Crowell et al., 2009; Gutierrez et al., 2009)KORRIGAN1 (KOR1) is a membrane-bound endo-1,4-β-d-glucanase (EGase) that is also required for cellulose synthesis (Nicol et al., 1998). Enzymatic analysis of a recombinant and soluble form of the Brassica napus KOR1 homolog showed substrate specificity for low-substituted carboxymethyl cellulose and amorphous cellulose but no activity on crystalline cellulose, xyloglucans, or short cellulose oligomers (Mølhøj et al., 2001; Master et al., 2004). Fractionation of microsomes demonstrated that KOR1 is primarily present in plasma membrane fractions but also at low levels in a tonoplast-enriched fraction (Nicol et al., 1998). Similarly, the KOR1 ortholog from tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) was found in the plasma membrane and fractions enriched for the Golgi apparatus (Brummell et al., 1997). A GFP-KOR1 fusion protein expressed with the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter accumulated in the Golgi apparatus and post-Golgi compartments and the tonoplast (Robert et al., 2005). Surprisingly for an enzyme involved in cellulose synthesis, the protein could not be detected at the plasma membrane. Using this construct, it was also shown that KOR1 undergoes regulated intracellular cycling (Robert et al., 2005).Although numerous genetic studies indicate that KOR1 is required for cellulose synthesis in primary and secondary cell walls and during cell plate formation (Nicol et al., 1998; Peng et al., 2000; Zuo et al., 2000; Lane et al., 2001; Sato et al., 2001; Szyjanowicz et al., 2004), its precise role in the cellulose synthesis process remains unclear. It has been suggested that KOR1 might be a component of the CSC (Read and Bacic, 2002). However, until now there has been no experimental evidence for this in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), either with coprecipitation experiments or with localization studies (Szyjanowicz et al., 2004; Robert et al., 2005; Desprez et al., 2007). Numerous hypotheses have been proposed to explain the paradoxical role of KOR1 in cellulose synthesis (Robert et al., 2004). KOR1 might have a proofreading activity involved in hydrolyzing disordered amorphous cellulose to relieve stress generated during the assembly of glucan chains in cellulose microfibrils (Mølhøj et al., 2002). Alternatively, KOR1 may determine the length of individual cellulose chains, either during cellulose synthesis or once the microfibril has been incorporated in the wall. A third hypothesis is that KOR1 releases the cellulose microfibril from the CSC before the complex is internalized from the plasma membrane (Somerville, 2006). Studies in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) fiber extracts identified sitosterol glucoside as a primer for the cellulose synthesis and suggested that KOR1 could be involved in their cleavage from the nascent glucan chain (Peng et al., 2002). However, this scenario is unlikely, since, at least for the bacterial CESA, which is homologous to plant CESAs, there is no evidence for the existence of lipid-linked precursors, as shown by the three-dimensional structure of an active complex (Morgan et al., 2013).In this study, we first confirmed previous observations (Paredez et al., 2008) that, in the leaky kor1-1 mutant, the velocity of the CSCs is reduced compared with that in a wild-type background but that, in addition, the mutation affects the ability of the cellulose synthesis inhibitor CGA325′615 (hereafter referred to as CGA) to induce the accumulation of GFP-CESA3 in a microtubule-associated compartment (MASC/small compartments carrying cellulose synthase complexes [SmaCCs]; Crowell et al., 2009; Gutierrez et al., 2009). This indicates that KOR1 plays a role both in the synthesis of cellulose and in the intracellular trafficking of the CSC. Using gel filtration approaches, we identified KOR1 in fractions of high molecular mass, suggesting that KOR1 is present in membranes as part of a protein complex. We next analyzed the dynamics of GFP-KOR1 expressed in the kor1-1 mutant background under the control of its endogenous promoter. GFP-KOR1 is found in discrete particles at the plasma membrane in the same cells as GFP-CESAs (Crowell et al., 2009). GFP-KOR1 plasma membrane particles migrate along linear trajectories with comparable velocities to those observed for GFP-CESAs. The organization of GFP-KOR1 at the plasma membrane also requires the presence of an intact microtubule array, suggesting that KOR1 and CESA trajectories in the plasma membrane are regulated in the same manner. GFP-KOR1 and mCherry-CESA1 partially colocalize in the plasma membrane, Golgi, and post-Golgi compartments. Finally, we provide evidence for direct interaction between KOR1 and primary cell wall CESA proteins using the membrane-based yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae NMY51) two-hybrid (MbYTH) system (Timmers et al., 2009) and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC). Our data support a new model in which KOR1 is an integral part of the CSC, where it plays a role not only in the synthesis of cellulose but also in the intracellular trafficking of the CSC.     

Patterning and Lifetime of Plasma Membrane-Localized Cellulose Synthase Is Dependent on Actin Organization in Arabidopsis Interphase Cells

The actin and microtubule cytoskeletons regulate cell shape across phyla, from bacteria to metazoans. In organisms with cell walls, the wall acts as a primary constraint of shape, and generation of specific cell shape depends on cytoskeletal organization for wall deposition and/or cell expansion. In higher plants, cortical microtubules help to organize cell wall construction by positioning the delivery of cellulose synthase (CesA) complexes and guiding their trajectories to orient newly synthesized cellulose microfibrils. The actin cytoskeleton is required for normal distribution of CesAs to the plasma membrane, but more specific roles for actin in cell wall assembly and organization remain largely elusive. We show that the actin cytoskeleton functions to regulate the CesA delivery rate to, and lifetime of CesAs at, the plasma membrane, which affects cellulose production. Furthermore, quantitative image analyses revealed that actin organization affects CesA tracking behavior at the plasma membrane and that small CesA compartments were associated with the actin cytoskeleton. By contrast, localized insertion of CesAs adjacent to cortical microtubules was not affected by the actin organization. Hence, both actin and microtubule cytoskeletons play important roles in regulating CesA trafficking, cellulose deposition, and organization of cell wall biogenesis.Plant cells are surrounded by a flexible yet durable extracellular matrix that makes up the cell wall. This structure offers mechanical strength that counters osmotically driven turgor pressure, is an important factor for water movement in plants, acts as a physical barrier against pathogens (Somerville et al., 2004), and is a determining factor for plant cell morphogenesis. Hence, the cell wall plays a central role in plant biology.Two main types of cell walls can typically be distinguished: the primary and the secondary cell wall. The major load-bearing component in both of these cell walls is the β-1,4-linked glucan polymer cellulose (Somerville et al., 2004). Cellulose polymers are synthesized by plasma membrane (PM)-localized cellulose synthase (CesA) complexes (Mueller and Brown, 1980), which contain several CesA subunits with similar amino acid sequences (Mutwil et al., 2008a). The primary wall CesA complexes are believed to be assembled in the Golgi and are subsequently delivered to the PM via vesicular trafficking (Gutierrez et al., 2009), sometimes associated with Golgi pausing (Crowell et al., 2009). Furthermore, the primary wall CesA complexes are preferentially inserted into the PM at sites that coincide with cortical microtubules (MTs), which subsequently guide cellulose microfibril deposition (Gutierrez et al., 2009). Hence, the cortical MT array is a determinant for multiple aspects of primary wall cellulose production.The actin cytoskeleton plays a crucial role in organized deposition of cell wall polymers in many cell types, including cellulose-related polymers and pectins in tip-growing cells, such as pollen tubes and root hairs (Hu et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2007). Thus, actin-depolymerizing drugs and genetic manipulation of ACTIN genes impair directed expansion of tip-growing cells and long-distance transport of Golgi bodies with vesicles to growing regions (Ketelaar et al., 2003; Szymanski, 2005). In diffusely growing cells in roots and hypocotyls, loss of anisotropic growth has also been observed in response to mutations to vegetative ACTIN genes and to actin-depolymerizing and -stabilizing drugs (Baluska et al., 2001; Kandasamy et al., 2009). While actin is clearly important for cell wall assembly, it is less clear what precise roles it plays.One well-known function of actin in higher plants is to support intracellular movement of cytoplasmic organelles via actomyosin-based motility (Geisler et al., 2008; Szymanski, 2009). During primary wall synthesis in interphase cells, treatment with the actin assembly inhibitor latrunculin B (LatB) led to inhibition of Golgi motility and pronounced inhomogenities in CesA density at the PM (Crowell et al., 2009; Gutierrez et al., 2009) that coincided with the density of underlying and immobile Golgi bodies (Gutierrez et al., 2009). These results suggested that Golgi motility is important for CesA distribution (Gutierrez et al., 2009). The actin cytoskeleton also appears to be important for secondary wall cellulose microfibril deposition. For example, longitudinal actin filaments (AFs) define the movement of secondary wall CesA-containing Golgi bodies in developing xylem vessels (Wightman and Turner, 2008). In addition, it has been proposed that the AFs also can regulate the delivery of the secondary wall CesA complex to the PM via pausing of the Golgi (Wightman and Turner, 2008). It is therefore clear that actin organization is important for CesA distribution and for the pattern of cellulose microfibril deposition.Despite the above findings, very few reports have undertaken detailed studies to elucidate the role of the actin cytoskeleton in the distribution and trafficking of specific proteins in plant cells. Here, we have investigated the intracellular trafficking of CesA-containing vesicles and delivery of CesAs to the PM, in the context of the actin cytoskeleton. We quantitatively demonstrate that the organization of the actin cytoskeleton regulates CesA-containing Golgi distribution and the exocytic and endocytic rate of the CesAs. However, actin organization has no effect on the localized insertion of CesAs at sites of MTs at the PM.     

Determining the Subcellular Location of Synthesis and Assembly of the Cell Wall Polysaccharide (1,3; 1,4)-β-d-Glucan in Grasses

The current dogma for cell wall polysaccharide biosynthesis is that cellulose (and callose) is synthesized at the plasma membrane (PM), whereas matrix phase polysaccharides are assembled in the Golgi apparatus. We provide evidence that (1,3;1,4)-β-d-glucan (mixed-linkage glucan [MLG]) does not conform to this paradigm. We show in various grass (Poaceae) species that MLG-specific antibody labeling is present in the wall but absent over Golgi, suggesting it is assembled at the PM. Antibodies to the MLG synthases, cellulose synthase-like F6 (CSLF6) and CSLH1, located CSLF6 to the endoplasmic reticulum, Golgi, secretory vesicles, and the PM and CSLH1 to the same locations apart from the PM. This pattern was recreated upon expression of VENUS-tagged barley (Hordeum vulgare) CSLF6 and CSLH1 in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves and, consistent with our biochemical analyses of native grass tissues, shown to be catalytically active with CSLF6 and CSLH1 in PM-enriched and PM-depleted membrane fractions, respectively. These data support a PM location for the synthesis of MLG by CSLF6, the predominant enzymatically active isoform. A model is proposed to guide future experimental approaches to dissect the molecular mechanism(s) of MLG assembly.     

Role of Aminoalcoholphosphotransferases 1 and 2 in Phospholipid Homeostasis in Arabidopsis

Aminoalcoholphosphotransferase (AAPT) catalyzes the synthesis of phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphotidylethanolamine (PE), which are the most prevalent membrane phospholipids in all eukaryotic cells. Here, we show that suppression of AAPTs results in extensive membrane phospholipid remodeling in Arabidopsis thaliana. Double knockout (KO) mutants that are hemizygous for either aapt1 or aapt2 display impaired pollen and seed development, leading to embryotic lethality of the double KO plants, whereas aapt1 or aapt2 single KO plants show no overt phenotypic alterations. The growth rate and seed yield of AAPT RNA interference (RNAi) plants are greatly reduced. Lipid profiling shows decreased total galactolipid and phospholipid content in aapt1-containing mutants, including aapt1, aapt1/aapt1 aapt2/AAPT2, aapt1/AAPT1 aapt2/aapt2, and AAPT RNAi plants. The level of PC in leaves was unchanged, whereas that of PE was reduced in all AAPT-deficient plants, except aapt2 KO. However, the acyl species of PC was altered, with increased levels of C34 species and decreased C36 species. Conversely, the levels of PE and phosphatidylinositol were decreased in C34 species. In seeds, all AAPT-deficient plants, including aapt2 KO, displayed a decrease in PE. The data show that AAPT1 and AAPT2 are essential to plant vegetative growth and reproduction and have overlapping functions but that AAPT1 contributes more than AAPT2 to PC production in vegetative tissues. The opposite changes in molecular species between PC and PE and unchanged PC level indicate the existence of additional pathways that maintain homeostatic levels of PC, which are crucial for the survival and proper development of plants.     

Cytochrome P450 CYP89A9 Is Involved in the Formation of Major Chlorophyll Catabolites during Leaf Senescence in Arabidopsis

Nonfluorescent chlorophyll catabolites (NCCs) were described as products of chlorophyll breakdown in Arabidopsis thaliana. NCCs are formyloxobilin-type catabolites derived from chlorophyll by oxygenolytic opening of the chlorin macrocycle. These linear tetrapyrroles are generated from their fluorescent chlorophyll catabolite (FCC) precursors by a nonenzymatic isomerization inside the vacuole of senescing cells. Here, we identified a group of distinct dioxobilin-type chlorophyll catabolites (DCCs) as the major breakdown products in wild-type Arabidopsis, representing more than 90% of the chlorophyll of green leaves. The molecular constitution of the most abundant nonfluorescent DCC (NDCC), At-NDCC-1, was determined. We further identified cytochrome P450 monooxygenase CYP89A9 as being responsible for NDCC accumulation in wild-type Arabidopsis; cyp89a9 mutants that are deficient in CYP89A9 function were devoid of NDCCs but accumulated proportionally higher amounts of NCCs. CYP89A9 localized outside the chloroplasts, implying that FCCs occurring in the cytosol might be its natural substrate. Using recombinant CYP89A9, we confirm FCC specificity and show that fluorescent DCCs are the products of the CYP89A9 reaction. Fluorescent DCCs, formed by this enzyme, isomerize to the respective NDCCs in weakly acidic medium, as found in vacuoles. We conclude that CYP89A9 is involved in the formation of dioxobilin-type catabolites of chlorophyll in Arabidopsis.     

InsP6-Sensitive Variants of the Gle1 mRNA Export Factor Rescue Growth and Fertility Defects of the ipk1 Low-Phytic-Acid Mutation in Arabidopsis

Myo-inositol-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate (InsP₆), also known as phytic acid, accumulates in large quantities in plant seeds, serving as a phosphorus reservoir, but is an animal antinutrient and an important source of water pollution. Here, we report that Gle1 (GLFG lethal 1) in conjunction with InsP₆ functions as an activator of the ATPase/RNA helicase LOS4 (low expression of osmotically responsive genes 4), which is involved in mRNA export in plants, supporting the Gle1-InsP₆-Dbp5 (LOS4 homolog) paradigm proposed in yeast. Interestingly, plant Gle1 proteins have modifications in several key residues of the InsP₆ binding pocket, which reduce the basicity of the surface charge. Arabidopsis thaliana Gle1 variants containing mutations that increase the basic charge of the InsP₆ binding surface show increased sensitivity to InsP₆ concentrations for the stimulation of LOS4 ATPase activity in vitro. Expression of the Gle1 variants with enhanced InsP₆ sensitivity rescues the mRNA export defect of the ipk1 (inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase) InsP₆-deficient mutant and, furthermore, significantly improves vegetative growth, seed yield, and seed performance of the mutant. These results suggest that Gle1 is an important factor responsible for mediating InsP₆ functions in plant growth and reproduction and that Gle1 variants with increased InsP₆ sensitivity may be useful for engineering high-yielding low-phytate crops.     

KONJAC1 and 2 Are Key Factors for GDP-Mannose Generation and Affect l-Ascorbic Acid and Glucomannan Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis

Humans are unable to synthesize l-ascorbic acid (AsA), yet it is required as a cofactor in many critical biochemical reactions. The majority of human dietary AsA is obtained from plants. In Arabidopsis thaliana, a GDP-mannose pyrophosphorylase (GMPP), VITAMIN C DEFECTIVE1 (VTC1), catalyzes a rate-limiting step in AsA synthesis: the formation of GDP-Man. In this study, we identified two nucleotide sugar pyrophosphorylase-like proteins, KONJAC1 (KJC1) and KJC2, which stimulate the activity of VTC1. The kjc1kjc2 double mutant exhibited severe dwarfism, indicating that KJC proteins are important for growth and development. The kjc1 mutation reduced GMPP activity to 10% of wild-type levels, leading to a 60% reduction in AsA levels. On the contrary, overexpression of KJC1 significantly increased GMPP activity. The kjc1 and kjc1kjc2 mutants also exhibited significantly reduced levels of glucomannan, which is also synthesized from GDP-Man. Recombinant KJC1 and KJC2 enhanced the GMPP activity of recombinant VTC1 in vitro, while KJCs did not show GMPP activity. Yeast two-hybrid assays suggested that the stimulation of GMPP activity occurs via interaction of KJCs with VTC1. These results suggest that KJCs are key factors for the generation of GDP-Man and affect AsA level and glucomannan accumulation through the stimulation of VTC1 GMPP activity.     

Arabidopsis Lipins,PDAT1 Acyltransferase,and SDP1 Triacylglycerol Lipase Synergistically Direct Fatty Acids toward β-Oxidation,Thereby Maintaining Membrane Lipid Homeostasis

Triacylglycerol (TAG) metabolism is a key aspect of intracellular lipid homeostasis in yeast and mammals, but its role in vegetative tissues of plants remains poorly defined. We previously reported that PHOSPHOLIPID:DIACYLGLYCEROL ACYLTRANSFERASE1 (PDAT1) is crucial for diverting fatty acids (FAs) from membrane lipid synthesis to TAG and thereby protecting against FA-induced cell death in leaves. Here, we show that overexpression of PDAT1 enhances the turnover of FAs in leaf lipids. Using the trigalactosyldiacylglycerol1-1 (tgd1-1) mutant, which displays substantially enhanced PDAT1-mediated TAG synthesis, we demonstrate that disruption of SUGAR-DEPENDENT1 (SDP1) TAG lipase or PEROXISOMAL TRANSPORTER1 (PXA1) severely decreases FA turnover, leading to increases in leaf TAG accumulation, to 9% of dry weight, and in total leaf lipid, by 3-fold. The membrane lipid composition of tgd1-1 sdp1-4 and tgd1-1 pxa1-2 double mutants is altered, and their growth and development are compromised. We also show that two Arabidopsis thaliana lipin homologs provide most of the diacylglycerol for TAG synthesis and that loss of their functions markedly reduces TAG content, but with only minor impact on eukaryotic galactolipid synthesis. Collectively, these results show that Arabidopsis lipins, along with PDAT1 and SDP1, function synergistically in directing FAs toward peroxisomal β-oxidation via TAG intermediates, thereby maintaining membrane lipid homeostasis in leaves.     

Pipecolic Acid,an Endogenous Mediator of Defense Amplification and Priming,Is a Critical Regulator of Inducible Plant Immunity

Metabolic signals orchestrate plant defenses against microbial pathogen invasion. Here, we report the identification of the non-protein amino acid pipecolic acid (Pip), a common Lys catabolite in plants and animals, as a critical regulator of inducible plant immunity. Following pathogen recognition, Pip accumulates in inoculated Arabidopsis thaliana leaves, in leaves distal from the site of inoculation, and, most specifically, in petiole exudates from inoculated leaves. Defects of mutants in AGD2-LIKE DEFENSE RESPONSE PROTEIN1 (ALD1) in systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and in basal, specific, and β-aminobutyric acid–induced resistance to bacterial infection are associated with a lack of Pip production. Exogenous Pip complements these resistance defects and increases pathogen resistance of wild-type plants. We conclude that Pip accumulation is critical for SAR and local resistance to bacterial pathogens. Our data indicate that biologically induced SAR conditions plants to more effectively synthesize the phytoalexin camalexin, Pip, and salicylic acid and primes plants for early defense gene expression. Biological priming is absent in the pipecolate-deficient ald1 mutants. Exogenous pipecolate induces SAR-related defense priming and partly restores priming responses in ald1. We conclude that Pip orchestrates defense amplification, positive regulation of salicylic acid biosynthesis, and priming to guarantee effective local resistance induction and the establishment of SAR.     

Cooperative Protein Folding by Two Protein Thiol Disulfide Oxidoreductases and ERO1 in Soybean

Most proteins produced in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of eukaryotic cells fold via disulfide formation (oxidative folding). Oxidative folding is catalyzed by protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) and PDI-related ER protein thiol disulfide oxidoreductases (ER oxidoreductases). In yeast and mammals, ER oxidoreductin-1s (Ero1s) supply oxidizing equivalent to the active centers of PDI. In this study, we expressed recombinant soybean Ero1 (GmERO1a) and found that GmERO1a oxidized multiple soybean ER oxidoreductases, in contrast to mammalian Ero1s having a high specificity for PDI. One of these ER oxidoreductases, GmPDIM, associated in vivo and in vitro with GmPDIL-2, was unable to be oxidized by GmERO1a. We therefore pursued the possible cooperative oxidative folding by GmPDIM, GmERO1a, and GmPDIL-2 in vitro and found that GmPDIL-2 synergistically accelerated oxidative refolding. In this process, GmERO1a preferentially oxidized the active center in the a′ domain among the a, a′, and b domains of GmPDIM. A disulfide bond introduced into the active center of the a′ domain of GmPDIM was shown to be transferred to the active center of the a domain of GmPDIM and the a domain of GmPDIM directly oxidized the active centers of both the a or a′ domain of GmPDIL-2. Therefore, we propose that the relay of an oxidizing equivalent from one ER oxidoreductase to another may play an essential role in cooperative oxidative folding by multiple ER oxidoreductases in plants.In eukaryotes, many secretory and membrane proteins fold via disulfide bond formation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Seed storage proteins of major crops, such as wheat, corn, rice, and beans, which are important protein sources for humans and domestic animals, are synthesized in the ER of the endosperm or cotyledon. A number of seed storage proteins fold by the formation of intramolecular disulfide bonds (oxidative folding) and are transported to and accumulate in protein bodies (Kermode and Bewley, 1999; Jolliffe et al., 2005). In contrast to normally folded proteins, misfolded and unfolded proteins are retained in the ER and degraded by an ER-associated degradation or vacuolar system (Smith et al., 2011; Pu and Bassham, 2013). Therefore, quick and efficient oxidative folding of nascent seed storage proteins is needed for their accumulation in protein bodies.During this process, protein disulfide isomerase (PDI; EC 5.3.4.1) and other ER protein thiol disulfide oxidoreductases (ER oxidoreductases) are thought to catalyze the formation and isomerization of disulfide bonds in nascent proteins (Hatahet and Ruddock, 2009; Feige and Hendershot, 2011; Lu and Holmgren, 2014). After phylogenetic analysis of the Arabidopsis genome, 10 classes of ER oxidoreductases (classes I–X) were identified (Houston et al., 2005). Among them, class I ER oxidoreductase, a plant PDI ortholog, has been studied in a wide variety of plants. Class I ER oxidoreductases have two catalytically active domains a and a′, containing active centers composed of Cys-Gly-His-Cys and two catalytically inactive domains b and b′. An Arabidopsis ortholog of class I ER oxidoreductases is required for proper seed development and regulates the timing of programmed cell death by chaperoning and inhibiting Cys proteases (Andème Ondzighi et al., 2008). OaPDI, a PDI from Oldenlandia affinis, a coffee family (Rubiaceae) plant, is involved in the folding of knotted circular proteins (Gruber et al., 2007). The rice ortholog (PDIL1-1) was suggested to be involved in the maturation of the major seed storage protein glutelin (Takemoto et al., 2002). Furthermore, rice PDIL1-1 plays a role in regulatory activities for various proteins that are essential for the synthesis of grain components as determined by analysis of a T-DNA insertion mutant (Satoh-Cruz et al., 2010).The oxidative refolding ability of class I ER oxidoreductases was confirmed in recombinant soybean (GmPDIL-1) and wheat proteins produced by an Escherichia coli expression system established from cDNAs (Kamauchi et al., 2008; Kimura et al., 2015).Class II and III ER oxidoreductases have an a–b–b′–a′ domain structure. Class II ER oxidoreductases have an acidic amino acid-rich sequence in the N-terminal region ahead of the a domain. Recombinant soybean (GmPDIL-2) and wheat class II ER oxidoreductases have oxidative refolding activities similar to that of class I (Kamauchi et al., 2008; Kimura et al., 2015). Class III ER oxidoreductases contain the nonclassical redox-center Cys-X-X-Ser/Cys motifs, as opposed to the more traditional CGHC sequence, in the a and a′ domains. Recombinant soybean (GmPDIL-3) and wheat proteins lack oxidative refolding activity in vitro (Iwasaki et al., 2009; Kimura et al., 2015). Class IV ER oxidoreductases are unique to plants and have an a–a′–ERp29 domain structure, which is homologous to the C-terminal domain of mammalian ERp29 (Demmer et al., 1997).Recombinant soybean class IV ER oxidoreductases (GmPDIS-1 and GmPDIS-2) and wheat class IV ER oxidoreductase possess an oxidative refolding activity that is weaker than that of classes I and II (Wadahama et al., 2007; Kimura et al., 2015). Class V ER oxidoreductases are plant orthologs of mammalian P5 and have an a–a′–b domain structure. A rice class V ER oxidoreductase, consisting of PDIL2 and PDIL3, plays an important role in the accumulation of the seed storage protein Cys-rich 10-kD prolamin (crP10; Onda et al., 2011). Recombinant soybean class V ER oxidoreductase, GmPDIM and wheat class V ER oxidoreductase possess an oxidative refolding activity similar to that of class IV (Wadahama et al., 2008; Kimura et al., 2015). In the soybean, GmPDIL-1, GmPDIL-2, GmPDIM, GmPDIS-1, and GmPDIS-2 were found to associate transiently with a seed storage precursor protein, proglycinin, in the ER of the cotyledon by coimmunoprecipitation experiments, suggesting that multiple ER oxidoreductases are involved in the folding of the nascent proglycinin.The disulfide bond in the active center of ER oxidoreductases is reduced as a result of catalyzing disulfide bond formation in an unfolded protein. The reduced active center of PDI was discovered to be oxidized again by ER oxidoreductin-1 (Ero1p) in yeast (Frand and Kaiser, 1998; Pollard et al., 1998). Ero1p orthologs are present universally in eukaryotes. Yeast and flies have a single copy of the ERO1 gene, which is essential for survival (Frand and Kaiser, 1998; Pollard et al., 1998; Tien et al., 2008). Mammals have two genes encoding Ero1-α (Cabibbo et al., 2000) and Ero1-β (Pagani et al., 2000) that function as major disulfide donors to nascent proteins in the ER, but are not critical for survival (Zito et al., 2010). Domain a of yeast PDI is the most favored substrate of yeast Ero1p (Vitu et al., 2010), whereas a′ of human PDI is specifically oxidized by human Ero1-α (Chambers et al., 2010) and Ero1-β (Wang et al., 2011). Electrons from Cys residues of the active centers of PDI are transferred to oxygen by Ero1 (Tu and Weissman, 2004; Sevier and Kaiser, 2008). The reaction mechanisms of yeast Ero1p and human Ero1s have been intensively investigated; their regulation by PDI has been extensively studied as well (Tavender and Bulleid, 2010; Araki and Inaba, 2012; Benham et al., 2013; Ramming et al., 2015). Only rice Ero1 (OsERO1) has been identified as a plant ortholog of Ero1p (Onda et al., 2009). OsERO1 is necessary for disulfide bond formation in rice endosperm. The formation of native disulfide bonds in the major seed storage protein proglutelin was demonstrated to depend upon OsERO1 by RNAi knockdown experiments. However, no plant protein thiol disulfide oxidoreductases that are oxidized by a plant Ero1 ortholog have been identified to date.In this study, we show that multiple soybean ER oxidoreductases can be activated by a soybean Ero1 ortholog (GmERO1a). In addition, we propose a synergistic mechanism by which GmPDIM and GmPDIL-2 cooperatively fold unfolded proteins using oxidizing equivalents provided by GmERO1 in vitro.     

Constitutively Active Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Versions Reveal Functions of Arabidopsis MPK4 in Pathogen Defense Signaling

Plant mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) are involved in important processes, including stress signaling and development. In a functional yeast screen, we identified mutations that render Arabidopsis thaliana MAPKs constitutively active (CA). Importantly, CA-MAPKs maintain their specificity toward known activators and substrates. As a proof-of-concept, Arabidopsis MAPK4 (MPK4) function in plant immunity was investigated. In agreement with the phenotype of mpk4 mutants, CA-MPK4 plants were compromised in pathogen-induced salicylic acid accumulation and disease resistance. MPK4 activity was found to negatively regulate pathogen-associated molecular pattern-induced reactive oxygen species production but had no impact on callose deposition, indicating that CA-MPK4 allows discriminating between processes regulated by MPK4 activity from processes indirectly affected by mpk4 mutation. Finally, MPK4 activity was also found to compromise effector-triggered immunity conditioned by the Toll Interleukin-1 Receptor–nucleotide binding (NB)–Leu-rich repeat (LRR) receptors RPS4 and RPP4 but not by the coiled coil–NB-LRR receptors RPM1 and RPS2. Overall, these data reveal important insights on how MPK4 regulates plant defenses and establishes that CA-MAPKs offer a powerful tool to analyze the function of plant MAPK pathways.     

Cell Growth Defect Factor1/CHAPERONE-LIKE PROTEIN OF POR1 Plays a Role in Stabilization of Light-Dependent Protochlorophyllide Oxidoreductase in Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis

Angiosperms require light for chlorophyll biosynthesis because one reaction in the pathway, the reduction of protochlorophyllide (Pchlide) to chlorophyllide, is catalyzed by the light-dependent protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase (POR). Here, we report that Cell growth defect factor1 (Cdf1), renamed here as CHAPERONE-LIKE PROTEIN OF POR1 (CPP1), an essential protein for chloroplast development, plays a role in the regulation of POR stability and function. Cdf1/CPP1 contains a J-like domain and three transmembrane domains, is localized in the thylakoid and envelope membranes, and interacts with POR isoforms in chloroplasts. CPP1 can stabilize POR proteins with its holdase chaperone activity. CPP1 deficiency results in diminished POR protein accumulation and defective chlorophyll synthesis, leading to photobleaching and growth inhibition of plants under light conditions. CPP1 depletion also causes reduced POR accumulation in etioplasts of dark-grown plants and as a result impairs the formation of prolamellar bodies, which subsequently affects chloroplast biogenesis upon illumination. Furthermore, in cyanobacteria, the CPP1 homolog critically regulates POR accumulation and chlorophyll synthesis under high-light conditions, in which the dark-operative Pchlide oxidoreductase is repressed by its oxygen sensitivity. These findings and the ubiquitous presence of CPP1 in oxygenic photosynthetic organisms suggest the conserved nature of CPP1 function in the regulation of POR.