Use of Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Bioidentical Hormone Therapy in Australian Women 50 to 69 Years of Age: Results from a National,Cross-Sectional Study

Menopausal Hormone Therapy (MHT) use in Australia fell by 55% from 2001 to 2005, following the release of large-scale findings on its risks and benefits. Comprehensive national data, including information on overall prevalence of MHT use as well as information on duration of use in Australia have not been reported since the 2004–5 National Health Survey, when 11% of women aged 45+ years were estimated to be current MHT users. No national data are available on prevalence of use of “bioidentical” hormone therapy (BHT). The objective of this study was to determine recent prevalence of MHT and BHT use. A cross-sectional, national, age-stratified, population survey was conducted in 2013. Eligible women, aged 50–69 years, resident in Australia were randomly sampled in 5-year age groups from the Medicare enrolment database (Australia’s universal health scheme). The response rate was 22% based on return of completed questionnaires, and analyses were restricted to 4,389 women within the specified age range. The estimated population-weighted prevalence of current use of MHT was 13% (95%CI 12–14), which was broadly similar to the previously reported national figures in 2004–5, suggesting that the use of MHT in Australia has largely stabilised over the past decade. A total of 39% and 20% of current-users with an intact uterus reported use of oestrogen-progestagen MHT and oestrogen-only MHT, respectively, whereas 77% of hysterectomised current-users used oestrogen-only MHT. Almost three-quarters of current-users [population-weighted prevalence 9% (95%CI 8–10)] had used MHT for ≥5 years. In regard to BHT, estimated population-weighted prevalence of ever use was 6% (95%CI 6–7) and 2% (95%CI 2–3) for current use. The population-weighted prevalence of MHT and BHT combined, in current users in their fifties and sixties was 15% (95%CI 14–16). These data provide a recent national “snapshot” of Australian women’s use of both conventional MHT and of BHT.     

Parathyroid Hormone Level Changes Following Radioiodine Therapy for Thyroid Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study

ObjectiveOur objective was to analyze the effect of radioiodine (RAI) therapy on parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion.MethodsA total of 137 patients were included and divided into 2 groups based on pretherapy PTH levels. The residual thyroid tissue volume was classified into 4 grades (0-3), and a value of 0 indicated that there was no apparent residual tissue. We analyzed the PTH level changes among different time points in each group and the factors that could predict the PTH level changes.ResultsIn 113 patients with normal parathyroid gland function, the PTH level at baseline, 1 day, 7 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after RAI therapy did not show any significant difference; in 24 patients with decreased parathyroid gland function, the level of PTH immediately decreased after the implementation of RAI therapy but gradually returned to a pre-RAI therapy level within 6 months. On the seventh day after therapy, the mean value of PTH in patients with a residual thyroid tissue volume of extent of 0/1 was 8.0 ± 2.3 pg/mL, which was significantly higher than that in patients with a residual thyroid tissue volume of extent of 2/3 (P = .011). Similar phenomena were observed 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after therapy.ConclusionRAI therapy had a significant transient adverse effect on parathyroid gland function in patients with decreased PTH secretion pretherapy, and the extent was associated with the amount of residual thyroid tissue.     

Risk of Breast Cancer by Type of Menopausal Hormone Therapy: a Case-Control Study among Post-Menopausal Women in France

Background

There is extensive epidemiological evidence that menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) increases breast cancer risk, particularly combinations of estrogen and progestagen (EP). We investigated the effects of the specific formulations and types of therapies used by French women. Progestagen constituents, regimen (continuous or sequential treatment by the progestagen), and time interval between onset of menopause and start of MHT were examined.

Methods

We conducted a population-based case-control study in France in 1555 menopausal women (739 cases and 816 controls). Detailed information on MHT use was obtained during in-person interviews. Odds ratios and 95% confidence interval adjusted for breast cancer risk factors were calculated.

Results

We found that breast cancer risk differed by type of progestagen among current users of EP therapies. No increased risk was apparent among EP therapy users treated with natural micronized progesterone. Among users of EP therapy containing a synthetic progestin, the odds ratio was 1.57 (0.99-2.49) for progesterone-derived and 3.35 (1.07-10.4) for testosterone-derived progestagen. Women with continuous regimen were at greater risk than women treated sequentially, but regimen and type of progestagen could not be investigated independently, as almost all EP combinations containing a testosterone-derivative were administered continuously and vice-versa. Tibolone was also associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Early users of MHT after onset of menopause were at greater risk than users who delayed treatment.

Conclusion

This study confirms differential effects on breast cancer risk of progestagens and regimens specifically used in France. Formulation of EP therapies containing natural progesterone, frequently prescribed in France, was not associated with increased risk of breast cancer but may poorly protect against endometrial cancer.     

Bias in Observational Studies of the Association between Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Breast Cancer

BackgroundDuring the period 1985-2000 the breast cancer incidence rates increased 50% in the age group invited to mammography screening in Norway and Sweden. Simultaneously, use of hormone replacement treatment therapy (HT) increased 5 times. Several influential observational studies showed that HT was associated with 50% to 100% increased risk of breast cancer and most for those using combined (estrogen plus progestin) hormone replacement therapy (CHT). In contrast, the randomized WHI trial reported that CHT increased the risk by 10% for those not having previously used hormones and 24% when including previous users in the analyses. In another randomized trial, estrogen use only was not associated with any increased risk at all. After the WHI trial was published in 2003, use of HT dropped 70% within 5 years in Norway and Sweden while breast cancer rates were essentially unchanged. After 2008, HT use has dropped further and breast cancer incidence rates have started increasing again. The study objective is to calculate and to explain potential bias in the observational study design.ConclusionsWe suggest that the mechanism causing higher hazard ratio of breast cancer (compared to the observational studies) is the time-varying effect of CHT on the breast cancer risk and selective retrospective reporting of hormone use. Other risk factors for the increase in breast cancer risk in the age group 50-69 years should be considered, for example, overdiagnosis.     

Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Coronary Heart Disease: Reconciling Divergent Findings from Observational Studies and Clinical Trials

Randomized clinical trials of menopausal hormone therapy have shown increased risks of coronary heart disease in the first few years after randomization, and neutral or increased risk over the full trial period. These results diverge substantially from the protective associations of menopausal hormone use with coronary heart disease found in observational studies. In common with many other studies, conventional analyses in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study cohort of estrogen plus progestin users showed an association with reduced risk of coronary heart disease even after adjustment for potential confounders. However, upon allowing risk to vary by time since initiation, the hazard ratios did not differ significantly from those observed in the clinical trial. In analyses combining clinical trial and observational data the hazard ratios were 1.58 (1.12, 2.24) within the first 2 years after initiation, 1.19 (0.87, 1.63) between 2 and 5 years, and 0.63 (0.59, 1.26) after 5 years. Similar analyses for estrogen alone also reconciled trial and observational data. These findings were confirmed in novel re-analyses of the Nurses’ Health Study when investigators for the first time included outcomes occurring in the interval between the biennial study cycles. The key towards understanding the underestimation of coronary heart disease in observational studies of menopausal hormone therapy appears to lie in the time-dependent nature of coronary heart disease risk rather than differences in study populations. Observational studies typically do not capture early events in current users and the data mostly reflect the experience of long-term users who have survived the early risk, while clinical trials by design capture early events very efficiently and mainly reflect short-term use.     

The Effect of Laterality and Primary Tumor Site on Cancer-Specific Mortality in Breast Cancer: A SEER Population-Based Study

Background

Reduced overall survival has been observed in patients with left-sided versus right-sided breast cancer due to cardiac toxicity after radiotherapy. However, the effect of laterality and primary tumor site on breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) remains unclear.

Patients and Methods

We analyzed data from 305,443 women ages 20- to 79-years-old diagnosed with breast cancer between 1990 and 2009. The data were obtained from the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the U.S. National Cancer Institute. The survival outcomes with regard to laterality and primary tumor site were compared using univariate and multivariate (Cox proportional hazards regression model) methods.

Results

In the multivariate analysis, BCSM was affected by the primary tumor site (P<0.0001) but not laterality (P = 0.331). The combined effect was piecewise: using the left upper-outer quadrant as the reference, the BCSM hazard ratio (HR) was not significant in the right upper quadrant (P = 0.755) and the right central portion (P = 0.329). The BCSM HR was slightly increased in the left central portion as well as the left and right lower-outer quadrants (HRs from 1.136 to 1.145; P<0.0001). The BCSM HR was significantly increased in the upper-inner and lower-inner quadrants (HRs from 1.242 to 1.372; P<0.0001) on both sides. Laterality only impacted BCSM in patients with breast cancer located in the central portion (HR, 1.100; P = 0.013, using the right side as the reference).

Conclusion

Patients with tumors in the upper-outer quadrant of both sides and the right central portion have a better prognosis than patients with tumors at other locations. Laterality is not regarded as a prognostic factor in breast cancer.     

Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Chronic Disease Risk in the Women’S Health Initiative: is Timing Everything?

ObjectiveThis review provides a comprehensive overview of the most recent findings from the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) hormone therapy (HT) trials and highlights the role of age and other clinical risk factors in risk stratification.MethodsWe review the findings on cardiovascular disease, cancer outcomes, all-cause mortality, and other major endpoints in the two WHI HT trials (conjugated equine estrogens [CEEs, 0.625 mg/day] with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate [MPA, 2.5 mg/day]).ResultsThe hazard ratio (HR) for coronary heart disease (CHD) was 1.18 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 1.45) in the CEE + MPA trial and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.78 to 1.14) in the CEE-alone trial. In both HT trials, there was an increased risk of stroke and deep vein thrombosis and a lower risk of hip fractures and diabetes. The HT regimens had divergent effects on breast cancer. CEE + MPA increased breast cancer risk (cumulative HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.48), whereas CEE alone had a protective effect (cumulative HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.97). The absolute risks of HT were low in younger women (ages 50 to 59 years) and those who were within 10 years of menopause onset. Furthermore, for CHD, the risks were elevated for women with metabolic syndrome or high low-densitylipoprotein cholesterol concentrations but not in women without these risk factors. Factor V Leiden genotype was associated with elevated risk of venous thromboembolism on HT.ConclusionHT has a complex pattern of benefits and risks. Women in early menopause have low absolute risks of chronic disease outcomes on HT. Use of HT for management of menopausal symptoms remains appropriate, and risk stratification will help to identify women in whom benefits would be expected to outweigh risks. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:1201-1213)     

Analysis of Sex Differences in Cancer-Specific Survival and Perioperative Mortality Following Radical Cystectomy: Results of a Large German Multicenter Study of Nearly 2500 Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder

BackgroundOutcome of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) varies between sexes. Although overall incidence is higher in men, cancer-specific survival (CSS) has been suggested to be lower in women. Although the former effect is attributed to greater exposure to carcinogens in men, the latter has not been elucidated.ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to identify sex-specific outcomes based on one of the largest databases of patients with UCB who underwent radical cystectomy (RC).MethodsThis retrospective multicenter series comprised 2483 patients in Stage M0 who underwent RC for UCB from 1989 to 2008; 20.4% of patients were women. The impact of sex on CSS in the entire study group and in specific subgroups was analyzed. The median follow-up time was 42 months (interquartile range, 21–79).ResultsHistopathologic criteria of pathologic tumor (pT), pathologic nodal (pN), grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and associated carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the study did not differ between sexes. The percentage of female patients increased over time. Five-year CSS in female patients was significantly lower than in male patients (60% vs 66%; P = 0.005). In multivariate analysis adjusted to other covariates, tumor stage ≥pT3 (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.44; P < 0.001), positive pN status (HR = 1.91; P < 0.001), LVI (HR = 1.48; P < 0.001), lower count of lymph nodes removed (HR = 0.98; P = 0.002), older age (HR = 1.01; P < 0.001), and female gender (HR = 1.26; P = 0.011) had an independent impact on CSS. Deterioration of CSS in female patients was pronounced when LVI was present (HR = 1.57; P < 0.001) and when RC was performed in the earlier time period (HR = 2.44; P < 0.001). However, women showed significantly lower perioperative mortality (within 90 days after RC) compared with men.ConclusionsAfter RC for UCB, cancer-specific mortality was higher in female patients; this disadvantage was more pronounced in earlier time periods. In addition, worse outcome of women with verified LVI was shown to be comparable with men. These findings were suggestive of different tumor biology and potentially unequal access to timely RC in earlier time periods because of reduced awareness of UCB in women. Further studies are required to improve UCB outcome in both sexes, notably in female patients.     

Hormone Replacement Therapy in Females Can Decrease the Risk of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

The purpose of the present meta-analysis was to determine the relationship between hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and lung cancer risk in females. Publications were reviewed and obtained through a PubMed, EMBASE database and Cochrane Library literature search up to May, 2012. The detailed numbers of patients in different groups, odd ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were collected and estimated using a random-effects model. Twenty five studies entered into the meta-analysis. The total number of participates and lung cancer patients was 656,403 and 11,442, respectively. The OR of all 25 studies was 0.91 (95%CI  = 0.83 to 0.99) and P value was 0.033. In stratified analyses, the positive association between HRT use and decreased lung cancer risk was also found in the patients with BMI<25 kg/m² (OR = 0.65, P = 0.000), and never smokers patients (OR = 0.86, P = 0.042). However, HRT use in patients with artificial menopause could increase the lung cancer risk, OR = 1.51(P = 0.001). The result of Egger''s test did not show any evidence of publican bias (P = 0.069). In conclusion, our meta-analysis on HRT and lung cancer risk suggests that HRT use is correlated with decreased lung cancer risk in female, especially in female with BMI<25 kg/m² and never smokers.     

Adherence to Growth Hormone Therapy: Results of a Multicenter Study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the adherence to growth hormone (GH) therapy and identify the influencing factors and outcomes in children.MethodsA total of 217 GH-naïve patients in 6 pediatric endocrinology clinics were enrolled in the study. Structured questionnaires were filled out and patients were evaluated at the initiation and 3rd, 6th, and 12th months of therapy. Patients were categorized into 4 adherence segments based on percentage of doses omitted at each evaluation period, classified as excellent if 0%, good if 5%, fair if 5 to 10%, and poor if > 10%.Results:There was a decrement in adherence to GH therapy during the study period (P = .006). Patients who showed excellent and good adherence to therapy had better growth velocity and growth velocity standard deviation scores (SDSs) (P = .014 and P = .015, respectively). A negative correlation between growth velocity SDS and number of missed injections was also observed (r = − .412; P = .007). A positive correlation between delta insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) SDS and growth velocity was demonstrated (r = .239; P = .042). IGF-1 levels were significantly higher in patients who showed excellent and good adherence to therapy (P = .01). Adherence was better in boys than in girls (P = .035), but adherence rates were not associated with age, cause of GH treatment, socioeconomic status, person who administered the injections, type of injection device, or GH product.ConclusionPoor adherence to GH therapy was common in our group of patients and was one of the factors underlying suboptimal growth during therapy. Before considering other problems that can affect growth, clinicians should confirm good adherence to therapy. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:46-51)     

Serum Hormone Concentrations in Transgender Individuals Receiving Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy: A Longitudinal Retrospective Cohort Study

ObjectiveTo examine the association of various gender-affirming hormone therapy regimens with blood sex hormone concentrations in transgender individuals.MethodsThis retrospective study included transgender people receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy between January 2000 and September 2018. Data on patient demographics, laboratory values, and hormone dose and frequency were collected. Nonparametric tests and linear regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with serum hormone concentrations.ResultsOverall, 196 subjects (134 transgender women and 62 transgender men), with a total of 941 clinical visits, were included in this study. Transgender men receiving transdermal testosterone had a significantly lower median concentration of serum total testosterone when compared with those receiving injectable preparations (326.0 ng/dL vs 524.5 ng/dL, respectively, P = .018). Serum total estradiol concentrations in the transgender women were higher in those receiving intramuscular estrogen compared with those receiving oral and transdermal estrogen (366.0 pg/mL vs 102.0 pg/mL vs 70.8 pg/mL, respectively, P < .001). A dose-dependent increase in the hormone levels was observed for oral estradiol (P < .001) and injectable testosterone (P = .018) but not for intramuscular and transdermal estradiol. Older age and a history of gonadectomy in both the transgender men and women were associated with significantly higher concentrations of serum gender-affirming sex hormones.ConclusionIn the transgender men, all routes and formulations of testosterone appeared to be equally effective in achieving concentrations in the male range. The intramuscular injections of estradiol resulted in the highest serum concentrations of estradiol, whereas transdermal estradiol resulted in the lowest concentration. There was positive relationship between both oral estradiol and injectable testosterone dose and serum sex hormone concentrations in transgender people receiving GAHT.     

Reproductive Factors and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Risk in the California Teachers Study

Background

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is a malignancy etiologically linked to immunomodulatory exposures and disorders. Endogenous female sex hormones may modify immune function and influence NHL risk. Few studies have examined associations between reproductive factors, which can serve as surrogates for such hormonal exposures, and NHL risk by subtype.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Women in the California Teachers Study cohort provided detailed data in 1995–1996 on reproductive history. Follow-up through 2007 identified 574 women with incident B-cell NHL. Hazard rate ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models to assess associations between reproductive factors and all B-cell NHL combined, diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, follicular lymphomas, and B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemias/small lymphocytic lymphomas. Pregnancy was marginally associated with lower risk of B-cell NHL (RR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.68–1.04). Much of the reduction in risk was observed after one full-term pregnancy relative to nulligravid women (RR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.54–1.06; P for trend <0.01), particularly for diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (P for trend = 0.13), but not among women who had only incomplete pregnancies. Age at first full-term pregnancy was marginally inversely associated with B-cell NHL risk overall (P for trend = 0.08) and for diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (P for trend = 0.056). Breast feeding was not associated with B-cell NHL risk overall or by subtype.

Conclusions

Full-term pregnancy and early age at first full-term pregnancy account for most of the observed reduction in B-cell NHL risk associated with gravidity. Pregnancy-related hormonal exposures, including prolonged and high-level exposure to progesterone during a full-term pregnancy may inhibit development of B-cell NHL.     

Carcinoma of the Lung: The Changing Pattern of Mortality in Ontario

Study of the mortality rates for carcinoma of the lung in men in Ontario between 1931 and 1959 reveals a rise from 3.7 in the early 1930''s to 26.7 per 100,000 in the late 1950''s. Analysis of age-specific mortality rates in five-year cohorts (groups of men born within five-year periods) shows that (1) mortality rates in each cohort rise rapidly after the age of 40, ascending in the later years of life almost as a straight line; (2) each succeeding cohort experiences an appreciably higher mortality rate than the preceding one. Mortality rates in individual cohorts in Ontario are compared with those in England; the shape of the cohort curves, and the rate of the increase in mortality from cohort to cohort, are almost identical. However, the picture in Ontario appears to be lagging some 10 years behind. The mortality rates for men in Ontario born around the year 1890 are almost identical with those shown by men born in England around 1880. The rates for carcinoma of the lung will almost inevitably continue to rise in Ontario for at least the next 10 to 20 years.     

Chronotype and postmenopausal breast cancer risk among women in the California Teachers Study

ABSTRACT

Chronotype is the behavioral manifestation of an individual’s underlying circadian rhythm, generally characterized by one’s propensity to sleep at a particular time during the 24 hour cycle. Evening chronotypes (“night owls”) generally suffer from worse physical and mental health compared to morning chronotypes (“morning larks”) – for reasons that have yet to be explained. One hypothesis is that evening chronotypes may be more susceptible to circadian disruption, a condition where the coordinated timing of biologic processes breaks down. The role of chronotype as an independent or modifying risk factor for cancer has not been widely explored. The objective of the current study was to evaluate the risk of breast cancer associated with chronotype in a case-control study nested within the California Teachers Study (CTS) cohort. The study population consisted of 39686 post-menopausal CTS participants who provided information on chronotype by completing a questionnaire in 2012–2013. 2719 cases of primary invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 1995/1996 through completion of the chronotype questionnaire were identified by linkage of the CTS to the California Cancer Registry. 36967 CTS participants who had remained cancer-free during this same time period served as controls. Chronotype was ascertained by responses to an abbreviated version of the Horne-Ostberg Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ) and was characterized into five categories: definite morning, more morning than evening, neither morning or evening, more evening than morning, definite evening. Multivariable unconditional logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for each of the chronotypes, adjusted for established breast cancer risk factors. Compared to definite morning types, definite evening types had an increased risk of breast cancer with elevated ORs that were statistically significant in both the crude (OR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.10–1.40) and fully-adjusted models (OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.06–1.35). The risk estimates in the fully-adjusted model for all other chronotypes did not significantly differ from one. These results suggest that evening chronotype may be an independent risk factor for breast cancer among a population of women who are not known to have engaged in any substantial night shift work. Further research in other populations of non-shift workers is warranted.     

激素替代疗法联合六味地黄丸对女性更年期综合征患者血清雌二醇、 催乳素水平及临床疗效影响

目的:探讨激素替代疗法联合六味地黄丸对女性更年期综合征患者血清雌二醇、催乳素及临床疗效影响。方法:选取2014年6月~2015年12月我院诊治的女性更年期综合征患者120例为研究对象,根据随机数字对照表分为对照组(60例)与试验组(60例)。对照组给予口服六味地黄丸治疗,试验组在对照组基础上联合倍美力治疗。比较两组的临床疗效、血清雌二醇、催乳素水平的变化。结果:两组患者潮热出汗、感觉异常、失眠、焦躁、忧郁、肌肉痛及关节痛症状评分及总评分均较治疗前明显降低(P0.05),试验组上述症状及总评分较对照组降低更为显著(P0.05);对照组血清雌二醇水平较治疗前无明显差异(P0.05),试验组血清雌二醇水平较治疗前显著升高(P0.05),两组血清催乳素水平均较治疗前降低(P0.05),且试验组血清催乳素水平明显较对照组低(P0.05)。结论:激素替代疗法联合六味地黄丸可显著提高女性更年期综合征患者的临床疗效,升高血清雌二醇水平同时降低催乳素水平。