Spatial organization of centrosome-attached and free microtubules in 3T3 fibroblasts

The spatial organization of microtubules is crucial for different cellular processes. It is traditionally supposed that fibroblasts have radial microtubule arrays consisting of long microtubules that run from the centrosome. However, a detailed analysis of the microtubule array in the internal cytoplasm has never been performed. In the current study, we used laser photobleaching to analyze the spatial organization of microtubules in the internal cytoplasm of cultured 3T3 fibroblasts. Cells were injected with Cy-3-labeled tubulin, after which the growth of microtubules in the centrosome region and peripheral parts of cytoplasm was assayed in the bleached zone. In most cases, microtubule growth in the bleached zone occurred rectilinearly; at distances of up to 5 μm, microtubules seldom bend more than 10°–15°. We considered a growing fragment of the microtubule as a vector with the beginning at the point of occurrence and the end at the point where the growth terminated (or the end point after 30 s if microtubule persistent growth proceeded for longer). We defined the direction of microtubule growth in different parts of the cell using these vectors and measured the angle of their deviation from the vector of comparison. In the area of the centrosome, we directed a comparison vector inside the bleached zone from the centrosome to the beginning of the growing microtubule segment; in the lamella and trailing part of the fibroblast, we used the vector of comparison directed along the long axis of the cell from its geometrical center to periphery. The microtubules growing straight away from the centrosome grew along the cell radius. However, at a distance of 10 μm from the centrosome, radially growing microtubules comprised 40% of the overall number, while at a distance of 20 μm, they made up only 25%. The rest of the microtubules grew in different directions, with the preferred angle between their growth direction and cell radius equaling around 90 °. In the lamella and trailing part of the fibroblast, 80% of all microtubules grew along the long axis of the cell or at an angle of no more than 20 °; 10–15% of microtubules grew along axis of the cell but towards the centrosome. Thus, in 3T3 fibroblasts, the radial system of microtubules is perturbed starting at a distance of several microns from the centrosome. In the internal cytoplasm, the microtubule system is completely disordered and, in the stretched parts of the polarized cell (lamella, trailing edge), the microtubule system again becomes well organized; microtubules are preferentially oriented along the long axis of the cell. From the results obtained, we conclude that the orderliness of microtubules at the periphery of the fibroblast is not a consequence of their growth from the centrosome; rather, their orientation is preset by local factors.     

The centrosomal protein C-Nap1 is required for cell cycle-regulated centrosome cohesion

Duplicating centrosomes are paired during interphase, but are separated at the onset of mitosis. Although the mechanisms controlling centrosome cohesion and separation are important for centrosome function throughout the cell cycle, they remain poorly understood. Recently, we have proposed that C-Nap1, a novel centrosomal protein, is part of a structure linking parental centrioles in a cell cycle-regulated manner. To test this model, we have performed a detailed structure-function analysis on C-Nap1. We demonstrate that antibody-mediated interference with C-Nap1 function causes centrosome splitting, regardless of the cell cycle phase. Splitting occurs between parental centrioles and is not dependent on the presence of an intact microtubule or microfilament network. Centrosome splitting can also be induced by overexpression of truncated C-Nap1 mutants, but not full-length protein. Antibodies raised against different domains of C-Nap1 prove that this protein dissociates from spindle poles during mitosis, but reaccumulates at centrosomes at the end of cell division. Use of the same antibodies in immunoelectron microscopy shows that C-Nap1 is confined to the proximal end domains of centrioles, indicating that a putative linker structure must contain additional proteins. We conclude that C-Nap1 is a key component of a dynamic, cell cycle-regulated structure that mediates centriole-centriole cohesion.     

Cell cycle-dependent localization of monoclonal antibodies raised against isolated Dictyostelium centrosomes.

The ultrastructure of the Dictyostelium centrosome is markedly different from that of the well known yeast spindle pole body and vertebrate centriole-containing centrosome. It consists of a box-shaped, layered core structure surrounded by a corona with dense nodules embedded in an amorphous matrix. For further structural and biochemical analyses of this type of centrosome we used highly enriched isolated Dictyostelium centrosomes as an antigen to raise 14 new centrosomal monoclonal antibodies. Immunofluorescence microscopy and Western blot analysis revealed that at least 10 of them were directed against different antigens. Immunofluorescence microscopy also showed that the monoclonal antibodies fell into three different groups: A) antibodies localizing to the centrosome during the entire cell cycle; B) antibodies staining the centrosome mainly during mitosis; and C) antibodies labeling centrosome associated structures. All antibodies, except one, exhibited a cell cycle-dependent staining pattern underscoring the highly dynamic properties of the Dictyostelium centrosome.     

Cargo Transport by Cytoplasmic Dynein Can Center Embryonic Centrosomes

To complete meiosis II in animal cells, the male DNA material needs to meet the female DNA material contained in the female pronucleus at the egg center, but it is not known how the male pronucleus, deposited by the sperm at the periphery of the cell, finds the cell center in large eggs. Pronucleus centering is an active process that appears to involve microtubules and molecular motors. For small and medium-sized cells, the force required to move the centrosome can arise from either microtubule pushing on the cortex, or cortically-attached dynein pulling on microtubules. However, in large cells, such as the fertilized Xenopus laevis embryo, where microtubules are too long to support pushing forces or they do not reach all boundaries before centrosome centering begins, a different force generating mechanism must exist. Here, we present a centrosome positioning model in which the cytosolic drag experienced by cargoes hauled by cytoplasmic dynein on the sperm aster microtubules can move the centrosome towards the cell’s center. We find that small, fast cargoes (diameter ∼100 nm, cargo velocity ∼2 µm/s) are sufficient to move the centrosome in the geometry of the Xenopus laevis embryo within the experimentally observed length and time scales.     

POPX2 phosphatase regulates cell polarity and centrosome placement

Proper centrosome positioning is critical for many cellular functions, such as cell migration and maintenance of polarity. During wound healing, fibroblasts orient their centrosomes such that they face the wound edge. The centrosome orientation determines the direction of cells’ migration so that they can close the wound effectively. In this study, we investigated the regulation of centrosome polarization and have identified the phosphatase POPX2 as an important regulator of centrosome orientation. We found that POPX2 inhibits centrosome centration, but not rearward nuclear movement, by regulating multiple proteins that function in centrosome positioning. High POPX2 levels result in reduced motility of the kinesin-2 motor, which, in turn, inhibits the transport of N-cadherin to the cell periphery and cell junctions. Loss of N-cadherin localization to the cell membrane affects the localization of focal adhesions and perturbs CDC42-Par6/PKCζ signaling. In addition, overexpression of POPX2 also results in a loss of Par3 localization to the cell periphery and reduced levels of LIC2 (dynein light intermediate chain 2), leading to defects in microtubule tethering and dynamics at cell-cell contacts. Therefore, POPX2 functions as a regulator of signaling pathways to modulate the positioning of centrosome in fibroblast during wound healing.     

Evolutionary problems in centrosome and centriole biology

Centrosomes have been an enigma to evolutionary biologists. Either they have been the subject of ill‐founded speculation or they have been ignored. Here, we highlight evolutionary paradoxes and problems of centrosome and centriole evolution and seek to understand them in the light of recent advances in centrosome biology. Most evolutionary accounts of centrosome evolution have been based on the hypothesis that centrosomes are replicators, independent of the nucleus and cytoplasm. It is now clear, however, that this hypothesis is not tenable. Instead, centrosomes are formed de novo each cell division, with the presence of an old centrosome regulating, but not essential for, the assembly of a new one. Centrosomes are the microtubule‐organizing centres of cells. They can potentially affect sensory and motor characters (as the basal body of cilia), as well as the movements of chromosomes during cell division. This latter role does not seem essential, however, except in male meiosis, and the reasons for this remain unclear. Although the centrosome is absent in some taxa, when it is present, its structure is extraordinarily conserved: in most taxa across eukaryotes, it does not appear to evolve at all. And yet a few insect groups display spectacular hypertrophy of the centrioles. We discuss how this might relate to the unusual reproductive system found in these insects. Finally, we discuss why the fate of centrosomes in sperm and early embryos might differ between different groups of animals.     

Centrosomal and non-centrosomal microtubules.

While microtubule (MT) arrays in cells are often focused at the centrosome, a variety of cell types contain a substantial number of non-centrosomal MTs. Epithelial cells, neurons, and muscle cells all contain arrays of non-centrosomal MTs that are critical for these cells' specialized functions. There are several routes by which non-centrosomal MTs can arise, including release from the centrosome, cytoplasmic assembly, breakage or severing, and stabilization from non-centrosomal sites. Once formed, MTs that are not tethered to the centrosome must be organized, which can be accomplished by means of self-organization or by capture and nucleation of MTs where they are needed. The presence of free MTs requires stabilization of minus ends, either by MT-associated proteins or by an end-capping complex. Although some of the basic elements of free MT formation and organization are beginning to be understood, a great deal of work is still necessary before we have a complete picture of how non-centrosomal MT arrays are assembled in specific cell types.     

Microsurgical removal of centrosomes blocks cell reproduction and centriole generation in BSC-1 cells

We have removed the centrosome from cultured BSC-1 cells by microsurgery, leaving enough cytoplasm with the nucleated cell fragment (karyoplast) to ensure survival and growth. In each experiment, we followed the fate of the karyoplast as well as the anucleate cell fragment (cytoplast) containing the original pair of centrioles. Experimental karyoplasts reestablish a juxtanuclear microtubule-organizing center, an astral array of microtubules, and a compact Golgi apparatus. They enter and presumably complete S phase, and they grow beyond the size of an average BSC-1 cell. However, they do not regenerate centrioles in time periods equivalent to more than 10 cell cycles and do not undergo cell division. Control-operated cells with centrosomes left in the karyoplast progress through the cell cycle, duplicate the centrosome, and form clonal cell colonies. We conclude that the removal of centrioles uncouples cell growth from cell reproduction and impedes centriole biogenesis and centrosome duplication.     

Dictyostelium discoideum: a promising centrosome model system

The centrosome of the slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum displays a morphology markedly different from centriolar centrosomes or yeast spindle pole bodies, while fulfilling the same conserved functions in the organization of the microtubule cytoskeleton. Recent advances suggest that the Dictyostelium centrosome may offer an interesting model system, usefully complementing other well-studied centrosome models. The establishment of an isolation procedure and the generation of a range of monoclonal antibodies have been achieved, which are important pre-requisites for biochemical investigation. Furthermore, the role of the centrosome in cell motility and centrosome duplication process have been investigated using cells with GFP-labelled centrosomes.     

Centrosome inheritance in starfish zygotes: selective loss of the maternal centrosome after fertilization

The mature egg inherits a centrosome from the second meiotic spindle, and the sperm introduces a second centrosome at fertilization. Since only one of these centrosomes survives to be used in development, specific mechanisms must exist to control centrosome inheritance. To investigate how centrosome inheritance is controlled we used starfish eggs as a model system, because they undergo meiosis after fertilization. As a result, the fate of the maternal and paternal centrosomes can be followed by light microscopy and experimentally manipulated in vivo. We show initially that only the paternal centrosome is used in starfish zygote development; the maternal centrosome retained from meiosis II is functionally lost before first mitosis. We then tested a number of possible ways in which the zygote could exert this differential control over the stability of centrosomes initially residing in the same cytoplasm. The results of these experiments can be summarized as follows: (1) Although the microtubule organizing center activity of the maternal centrosome is not degraded after meiosis, the ability of this centrosome to double at successive mitoses is lost. (2) The sperm centrosome is not "masked" from cytoplasmic conditions which could destabilize all centrosomes during or after the meiotic sequence. (3) The functional loss of the maternal centrosome is not due to its cortical location. (4) The loss of this doubling capacity is determined by the egg, not by putative inhibitory factors from the fertilizing sperm. (5) The destabilization of the maternal centrosome is not due to the complete loss of its centrioles. Together, these results demonstrate that all maternal centrosomes are equivalent and that they are intrinsically different from the paternal centrosome. This intrinsic difference, in concert with a change in cytoplasmic conditions after meiosis, determines the selective loss of the maternal centrosome inherited from the meiosis II spindle.     

Microtubule nucleation and release from the neuronal centrosome

We have proposed that microtubules (MTs) destined for axons and dendrites are nucleated at the centrosome within the cell body of the neuron, and are then released for translocation into these neurites (Baas, P. W., and H. C. Joshi. 1992. J. Cell Biol. 119:171-178). In the present study, we have tested the capacity of the neuronal centrosome to act as a generator of MTs for relocation into other regions of the neuron. In cultured sympathetic neurons undergoing active axonal outgrowth, MTs are present throughout the cell body including the region around the centrosome, but very few (< 10) are directly attached to the centrosome. These results indicate either that the neuronal centrosome is relatively inactive with regard to MT nucleation, or that most of the MTs nucleated at the centrosome are rapidly released. Treatment for 6 h with 10 micrograms/ml nocodazole results in the depolymerization of greater than 97% of the MT polymer in the cell body. Within 5 min after removal of the drug, hundreds of MTs have assembled in the region of the centrosome, and most of these MTs are clearly attached to the centrosome. A portion of the MTs are not attached to the centrosome, but are aligned side-by-side with the attached MTs, suggesting that the unattached MTs were released from the centrosome after nucleation. In addition, unattached MTs are present in the cell body at decreasing levels with increasing distance from the centrosome. By 30 min, the MT array of the cell body is indistinguishable from that of controls. The number of MTs attached to the centrosome is once again diminished to fewer than 10, suggesting that the hundreds of MTs nucleated from the centrosome after 5 min were subsequently released and translocated away from the centrosome. These results indicate that the neuronal centrosome is a highly potent MT- nucleating structure, and provide strong indirect evidence that MTs nucleated from the centrosome are released for translocation into other regions of the neuron.     

Centrosome centering and decentering by microtubule network rearrangement

The centrosome is positioned at the cell center by pushing and pulling forces transmitted by microtubules (MTs). Centrosome decentering is often considered to result from asymmetric, cortical pulling forces exerted in particular by molecular motors on MTs and controlled by external cues affecting the cell cortex locally. Here we used numerical simulations to investigate the possibility that it could equally result from the redistribution of pushing forces due to a reorientation of MTs. We first showed that MT gliding along cell edges and pivoting around the centrosome regulate MT rearrangement and thereby direct the spatial distribution of pushing forces, whereas the number, dynamics, and stiffness of MTs determine the magnitude of these forces. By modulating these parameters, we identified different regimes, involving both pushing and pulling forces, characterized by robust centrosome centering, robust off-centering, or “reactive” positioning. In the last-named conditions, weak asymmetric cues can induce a misbalance of pushing and pulling forces, resulting in an abrupt transition from a centered to an off-centered position. Taken together, these results point to the central role played by the configuration of the MTs on the distribution of pushing forces that position the centrosome. We suggest that asymmetric external cues should not be seen as direct driver of centrosome decentering and cell polarization but instead as inducers of an effective reorganization of the MT network, fostering centrosome motion to the cell periphery.     

Centrosome inheritance in insects: fertilization and parthenogenesis.

Centrosome biogenesis is unclear, although much structural and biochemical research has been performed in several experimental systems. An alternative model to study the assembly of functional centrosomes could be the process of zygotic centrosome formation at the beginning of embryonic development. Although it seems obvious that the sperm cell provides the centrosome at fertilization, some pieces of evidence are not in line with this point of view and give controversial results. Such an analysis could provide useful information if applied to a large variety of organisms. Since insects are a highly diverse group of organisms they provide a variety of models in which to study the process of centrosome reconstitution during fertilization. Moreover, many insect species reproduce by parthenogenesis, a special mode of reproduction in which embryonic development occurs without male contribution. Studies of unfertilized parthenogenetic eggs may therefore teach us much about the process of centrosome assembly in the absence of preexisting centrioles.     

The novel centrosomal associated protein CEP55 is present in the spindle midzone and the midbody

Centrosomes are the major microtubule nucleating center in the cell; they also contribute to spindle pole organization and play a role in cell cycle progression as well as completing cytokinesis. Here we describe the molecular characterization of a novel human gene, CEP55, located in 10q23.33 that is expressed in multiple tissues and various cancer cell lines. Sequence analysis of the cDNA predicted a protein of 464 amino acids with several putative coiled-coil domains that are responsible for protein-protein interactions. Indeed, we found homodimerization of CEP55 by coimmunoprecipitation. Subcellular localization analysis revealed that endogenous CEP55 as well as an EGFP-CEP55 fusion protein is present at the centrosome throughout mitosis, whereas it also appears at the cleavage furrow in late anaphase and in the midbody in cytokinesis. Neither nocodazole nor taxol interfered with centrosome association of endogenous CEP55, suggesting that it directly interacts with centrosome components rather than with microtubules. In microtubule regrowth assays, overexpression of CEP55 did not enhance or inhibit microtubule nucleation. Together, these data suggest a possible involvement of CEP55 in centrosome-dependent cellular functions, such as centrosome duplication and/or cell cycle progression, or in the regulation of cytokinesis.     

Molecular components of the centrosome

The centrosome organizes microtubules during both interphase and mitosis and therefore governs fundamental processes in the life of a eukaryotic cell. The past few years have seen a substantial increase in the identification of potential components localized at the centrosome. Although we are still far from achieving a coherent picture of the workings of the centrosome, these recent discoveries are promising first steps towards an understanding of centrosomal functions at the molecular level.     

Structural centrosome aberrations promote non‐cell‐autonomous invasiveness

Centrosomes are the main microtubule‐organizing centers of animal cells. Although centrosome aberrations are common in tumors, their consequences remain subject to debate. Here, we studied the impact of structural centrosome aberrations, induced by deregulated expression of ninein‐like protein (NLP), on epithelial spheres grown in Matrigel matrices. We demonstrate that NLP‐induced structural centrosome aberrations trigger the escape (“budding”) of living cells from epithelia. Remarkably, all cells disseminating into the matrix were undergoing mitosis. This invasive behavior reflects a novel mechanism that depends on the acquisition of two distinct properties. First, NLP‐induced centrosome aberrations trigger a re‐organization of the cytoskeleton, which stabilizes microtubules and weakens E‐cadherin junctions during mitosis. Second, atomic force microscopy reveals that cells harboring these centrosome aberrations display increased stiffness. As a consequence, mitotic cells are pushed out of mosaic epithelia, particularly if they lack centrosome aberrations. We conclude that centrosome aberrations can trigger cell dissemination through a novel, non‐cell‐autonomous mechanism, raising the prospect that centrosome aberrations contribute to the dissemination of metastatic cells harboring normal centrosomes.     

An essential role for katanin in severing microtubules in the neuron

Several lines of evidence suggest that microtubules are nucleated at the neuronal centrosome, and then released for transport into axons and dendrites. Here we sought to determine whether the microtubule-severing protein known as katanin mediates microtubule release from the neuronal centrosome. Immunomicroscopic analyses on cultured sympathetic neurons show that katanin is present at the centrosome, but is also widely distributed throughout the neuron. Microinjection of an antibody that inactivates katanin results in a dramatic accumulation of microtubules at the centrosome, indicating that katanin is indeed required for microtubule release from the centrosome. However, the antibody also causes an inhibition of axon outgrowth that is more immediate than expected on this basis alone. It may be that katanin severs microtubules throughout the cell body to keep them sufficiently short to be efficiently transported into developing processes. Consistent with this idea, there were significantly fewer free ends of microtubules in the cell bodies of neurons that had been injected with the katanin antibody compared with controls. These results indicate that microtubule-severing by katanin is essential for releasing microtubules from the neuronal centrosome, and also for regulating the length of the microtubules after their release.     

Centriolar satellite– and hMsd1/SSX2IP-dependent microtubule anchoring is critical for centriole assembly

Centriolar satellites are numerous electron-dense granules dispersed around the centrosome. Mutations in their components are linked to various human diseases, but their molecular roles remain elusive. In particular, the significance of spatial communication between centriolar satellites and the centrosome is unknown. hMsd1/SSX2IP localizes to both the centrosome and centriolar satellites and is required for tethering microtubules to the centrosome. Here we show that hMsd1/SSX2IP-mediated microtubule anchoring is essential for proper centriole assembly and duplication. On hMsd1/SSX2IP knockdown, the centriolar satellites become stuck at the microtubule minus end near the centrosome. Intriguingly, these satellites contain many proteins that normally localize to the centrosome. Of importance, microtubule structures, albeit not being anchored properly, are still required for the emergence of abnormal satellites, as complete microtubule depolymerization results in the disappearance of these aggregates from the vicinity of the centrosome. We highlighted, using superresolution and electron microscopy, that under these conditions, centriole structures are faulty. Remarkably, these cells are insensitive to Plk4 overproduction–induced ectopic centriole formation, yet they accelerate centrosome reduplication upon hydroxyurea arrest. Finally, the appearance of satellite aggregates is cancer cell specific. Together our findings provide novel insights into the mechanism of centriole assembly and microtubule anchoring.     

Microtubules' interaction with cell cortex is required for their radial organization, but not for centrosome positioning

Microtubules in interphase mammalian cells usually form a radial array with minus-ends concentrated in the central region and plus-ends placed at the periphery. This is accepted as correct, that two factors determinate the radial organization of microtubules - the centrosome, which nucleate and anchor the microtubules minus-ends, and the interaction of microtubules with cortical dynein, which positions centrosome in the cell center. However, it looks as if there are additional factors, affecting the radial structure of microtubule system. We show here that in aged Vero cytoplasts (17 h after enucleation) microtubule system lost radial organization and became chaotic. To clear up the reasons of that, we studied centrosome activity, its position in the cytoplasts and microtubule dynamics. We found that centrosome in aged cytoplasts was still active and placed in the central region of the cytoplasm, while after total disruption of the microtubules it was displaced from the center. Microtubules in aged cytoplasts were not stabilized, but they lost their ability to stop to grow near cell cortex and continued to grow reaching it. Aged cytoplast lamellae was partially depleted with dynactin though Golgi remained compact indicating dynein activity. We conclude that microtubule stoppage at cell cortex is mediated by some (protein) factors, and these factors influence radial structure of microtubule system. It seems that the key role in centrosome positioning is played by dynein complexes anchored everywhere in the cytoplasm rather than anchored in cell cortex.