Poly-ADP-ribosylation of HMGB1 regulates TNFSF10/TRAIL resistance through autophagy

Both apoptosis ("self-killing") and autophagy ("self-eating") are evolutionarily conserved processes, and their crosstalk influences anticancer drug sensitivity and cell death. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we demonstrated that HMGB1 (high mobility group box 1), normally a nuclear protein, is a crucial regulator of TNFSF10/TRAIL (tumor necrosis factor [ligand] superfamily, member 10)-induced cancer cell death. Activation of PARP1 (poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1) was required for TNFSF10-induced ADP-ribosylation of HMGB1 in cancer cells. Moreover, pharmacological inhibition of PARP1 activity or knockdown of PARP1 gene expression significantly inhibited TNFSF10-induced HMGB1 cytoplasmic translocation and subsequent HMGB1-BECN1 complex formation. Furthermore, suppression of the PARP1-HMGB1 pathway diminished autophagy, increased apoptosis, and enhanced the anticancer activity of TNFSF10 in vitro and in a subcutaneous tumor model. These results indicate that PARP1 acts as a prominent upstream regulator of HMGB1-mediated autophagy and maintains a homeostatic balance between apoptosis and autophagy, which provides new insight into the mechanism of TNFSF10 resistance.     

Poly-ADP-ribosylation of HMGB1 regulates TNFSF10/TRAIL resistance through autophagy

Both apoptosis ("self-killing") and autophagy ("self-eating") are evolutionarily conserved processes, and their crosstalk influences anticancer drug sensitivity and cell death. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, we demonstrated that HMGB1 (high mobility group box 1), normally a nuclear protein, is a crucial regulator of TNFSF10/TRAIL (tumor necrosis factor [ligand] superfamily, member 10)-induced cancer cell death. Activation of PARP1 (poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1) was required for TNFSF10-induced ADP-ribosylation of HMGB1 in cancer cells. Moreover, pharmacological inhibition of PARP1 activity or knockdown of PARP1 gene expression significantly inhibited TNFSF10-induced HMGB1 cytoplasmic translocation and subsequent HMGB1-BECN1 complex formation. Furthermore, suppression of the PARP1-HMGB1 pathway diminished autophagy, increased apoptosis, and enhanced the anticancer activity of TNFSF10 in vitro and in a subcutaneous tumor model. These results indicate that PARP1 acts as a prominent upstream regulator of HMGB1-mediated autophagy and maintains a homeostatic balance between apoptosis and autophagy, which provides new insight into the mechanism of TNFSF10 resistance.     

Regulation of HMGB1 release by autophagy

The characteristics of tumor cell killing by an anti-cancer agent can determine the long-term effectiveness of the treatment. For example, if dying tumor cells release the immune modulator HMGB1 after treatment with anti-cancer drugs, they can activate a tumor-specific immune response that boosts the effectiveness of the initial treatment. Recent work from our group examined the mechanism of action of a targeted toxin called DT-EGF that selectively kills Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-expressing tumor cells. We found that DT-EGF kills glioblastoma cells by a caspase-independent mechanism that involves high levels of autophagy, which inhibits cell death by blocking apoptosis. In contrast, DT-EGF kills epithelial tumor cells by caspase-dependent apoptosis and in these cells autophagy is not induced. These differences allowed us to discover that the different death mechanisms were associated with differences in the release of HMGB1 and that autophagy induction is required and sufficient to cause release of HMGB1 from the dying cells. These data identify a new function for autophagy during cell death and open up the possibility of manipulating autophagy during cancer treatment as a way to influence the immunogenicity of dying tumor cells.     

Autophagy regulates selective HMGB1 release in tumor cells that are destined to die

Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy) can increase or decrease the amount of cell death in response to various stimuli. To test whether autophagy also controls the characteristics associated with dying cells, we studied tumor cell killing by epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted diphtheria toxin (DT-EGF). DT-EGF kills epithelial and glioblastoma tumor cells with similar efficiency but by different mechanisms that depend on whether the cells activate autophagy when treated with the drug. Dying cells in which autophagy is induced selectively release the immune modulator high-mobility group B1 (HMGB1) without causing lysis of the cell membrane and classical necrosis. Conversely, cells that are killed by DT-EGF where autophagy is blocked, activate caspases but retain HMGB1. These data suggest that it may be feasible to manipulate the immunogenicity of dying cells by increasing or decreasing autophagy.     

Defective immunogenic cell death of HMGB1-deficient tumors: compensatory therapy with TLR4 agonists

Immunogenic cell death induced by anticancer chemotherapy is characterized by a series of molecular hallmarks that include the exodus of high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) from dying cells. HMGB1 is a nuclear nonhistone chromatin-binding protein. It is secreted at the late stages of cellular demise and engages Toll-like receptor4 (TLR4) on dendritic cells (DCs) to accelerate the processing of phagocytic cargo in the DC and to facilitate antigen presentation by DC to T cells. The absence of HMGB1 expression by dying tumor cells exposed to anthracyclines or oxaliplatin compromises DC-dependent T-cell priming by tumor-associated antigens. Here, we show that transplantable tumors exhibiting weak expression of nuclear HMGB1 respond to chemotherapy more effectively if the treatment is combined with the local or systemic administration of a highly purified and physiochemically defined and standardized lipopolysaccharide solution, which acts as a high-potency and exclusive TLR4 agonist, called Dendrophilin (DEN). The synergistic antitumor effects mediated by the combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy relied upon the presence of the MyD88 (myeloid differentiation primary response gene) adapter of TLR4 (but not that of the TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β adapter), in line with the well-characterized action of DEN on the MyD88 signaling pathway. DEN and anthracyclines synergized to induce intratumoral accumulation of interferon-γ-producing CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T lymphocytes. Moreover, DEN could restore the immunogenicity of dying tumor cells from which HMGB1 had been depleted by RNA interference. These findings underscore the potential clinical utility of combination regimens involving immunogenic chemotherapy and certain TLR4 agonists in advanced HMGB1-deficient cancers.     

The redox protein HMGB1 regulates cell death and survival in cancer treatment

Metabolic and therapeutic stress activates several signal transduction pathways and releases damageassociated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs) that regulate cell death and cell survival. The prototypical DAMP, high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) is released with sustained autophagy, late apoptosis and necrosis. Our recent findings reveal that the HMGB1 protein triggers autophagy or apoptosis in cancer cells, depending on its redox status. Reducible HMGB1 binds to the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE), induces Beclin 1-dependent autophagy and promotes pancreatic or colon tumor cell line resistance to chemotherapeutic agents or ionizing radiation. In contrast, oxidized HMGB1 increases the cytotoxicity of these agents and induces apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway. This suggests a new function for HMGB1 within the tumor microenvironment, regulating cell death and survival and suggests that it plays an important functional role in cross-regulating apoptosis and autophagy.     

Sustained tumour eradication after induced caspase-3 activation and synchronous tumour apoptosis requires an intact host immune response

Effective anticancer treatments often result in the induction of large amounts of tumour cell death. In vivo, such dying tumour cells are a potential source of antigens for T-cell stimulation. Although apoptosis is generally considered nonimmunogenic, recent evidence suggests that some anticancer therapies that induce apoptosis can elicit antitumour immune responses. Here, a doxycycline-inducible, constitutively active caspase-3 (‘death switch'') was constructed in a murine tumour model to explore the impact of the host immune response to rapid, synchronous and substantial tumour cell apoptosis. In vitro, up to 80% of tumour cells underwent apoptotic cell death within 24 h and death was accompanied by the release of potential ‘danger signal'' molecules HMGB1 and HSP90. In vivo, death switch induction provoked rapid, pronounced tumour regression in immune-competent and immune-deficient mice, but sustained tumour eradication was observed only in immune-competent mice. Moreover, the majority of mice that were tumour free after death switch induction were protected from further tumour rechallenge. In addition, long-term remission after induction of the death switch was completely abrogated following depletion of CD8 T cells. These data suggest that sustained tumour eradication after substantial tumour apoptosis requires an antitumour host immune response that prevents tumour relapse. In many patients, cancer therapies produce encouraging initial responses that are only short lived. These results provide new insights that may have important implications for further development of strategies that result in long-term tumour clearance after initially effective anticancer treatment.     

Necrosis is associated with IL-6 production but apoptosis is not

Due to loss of cell membrane integrity, necrotic cells passively release several cytosolic factors that can activate antigen presenting cells and other immune cells. In contrast, cells dying by apoptosis do not induce an inflammatory response. Here we show that necrotic cell death induced by several stimuli, such as TNF, anti-Fas or dsRNA, coincides with NF-kappaB-and p38MAPK-mediated upregulation and secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6. This event is greatly reduced or absent in conditions of apoptotic cell death induced by the same stimuli. This demonstrates that besides the capacity of necrotic cells to induce an inflammatory response due to leakage of cellular contents, necrotic dying cells themselves are involved in the expression and secretion of inflammatory cytokines. Moreover, inhibition of NF-kappaB and p38MAPK activation does not affect necrotic cell death in all conditions tested. This suggests that the activation of inflammatory pathways is distinct from the activation of necrotic cell death sensu strictu.     

Targeting HMGB1-mediated autophagy as a novel therapeutic strategy for osteosarcoma

Autophagy is a catabolic process critical to maintaining cellular homeostasis and responding to cytotoxic insult. Autophagy is recognized as "programmed cell survival" in contrast to apoptosis or programmed cell death. Upregulation of autophagy has been observed in many types of cancers and has been demonstrated to both promote and inhibit antitumor drug resistance depending to a large extent on the nature and duration of the treatment-induced metabolic stress as well as the tumor type. Cisplatin, doxorubicin and methotrexate are commonly used anticancer drugs in osteosarcoma, the most common form of childhood and adolescent cancer. Our recent study demonstrated that high mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1)-mediated autophagy is a significant contributor to drug resistance in osteosarcoma cells. Inhibition of both HMGB1 and autophagy increase the drug sensitivity of osteosarcoma cells in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the ULK1-FIP200 complex is required for the interaction between HMGB1 and BECN1, which then promotes BECN1-PtdIns3KC3 complex formation during autophagy. Thus, these findings provide a novel mechanism of osteosarcoma resistance to therapy facilitated by HMGB1-mediated autophagy and provide a new target for the control of drug-resistant osteosarcoma patients.     

Targeting HMGB1-mediated autophagy as a novel therapeutic strategy for osteosarcoma

Autophagy is a catabolic process critical to maintaining cellular homeostasis and responding to cytotoxic insult. Autophagy is recognized as “programmed cell survival” in contrast to apoptosis or programmed cell death. Upregulation of autophagy has been observed in many types of cancers and has been demonstrated to both promote and inhibit antitumor drug resistance depending to a large extent on the nature and duration of the treatment-induced metabolic stress as well as the tumor type. Cisplatin, doxorubicin and methotrexate are commonly used anticancer drugs in osteosarcoma, the most common form of childhood and adolescent cancer. Our recent study demonstrated that high mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1)-mediated autophagy is a significant contributor to drug resistance in osteosarcoma cells. Inhibition of both HMGB1 and autophagy increase the drug sensitivity of osteosarcoma cells in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the ULK1-FIP200 complex is required for the interaction between HMGB1 and BECN1, which then promotes BECN1-PtdIns3KC3 complex formation during autophagy. Thus, these findings provide a novel mechanism of osteosarcoma resistance to therapy facilitated by HMGB1-mediated autophagy and provide a new target for the control of drug-resistant osteosarcoma patients.     

Strange attractors: DAMPs and autophagy link tumor cell death and immunity

Resistance to ‘apoptotic'' cell death is one of the major hallmarks of cancer, contributing to tumor development and therapeutic resistance. Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are molecules released or exposed by dead, dying, injured, or stressed non-apoptotic cells, with multiple roles in inflammation and immunity. Release of DAMPs not only contributes to tumor growth and progression but also mediates skewing of antitumor immunity during so-called immunogenic tumor cell death (ICD). Autophagy is a lysosome-mediated homeostatic degradation process in which cells digest their own effete organelles and macromolecules to meet bioenergetic needs and enable protein synthesis. For tumor cells, autophagy is a double-edged sword. Autophagy, in balance with apoptosis, can function as a tumor suppressor; autophagy deficiency, associated with alterations in apoptosis, initiates tumorigenesis in many settings. In contrast, autophagy-related stress tolerance generally promotes cell survival, which enables tumor growth and promotes therapeutic resistance. Most anticancer therapies promote DAMP release and enhance autophagy. Autophagy not only regulates DAMP release and degradation, but also is triggered and regulated by DAMPs. This interplay between autophagy and DAMPs, serving as ‘strange attractors'' in the dynamic system that emerges in cancer, regulates the effectiveness of antitumor treatment. This interplay also shapes the immune response to dying cells upon ICD, culling the least fit tumor cells and promoting survival of others. Thus, DAMPs and autophagy are suitable emergent targets for cancer therapy, considering their more nuanced role in tumor progression.     

Compensatory mechanisms and the type of injury determine the fate of cells with impaired macroautophagy

The relationship between the degradative process of autophagy and cellular death pathways remains unclear. Macroautophagy may potentially function to prevent or promote cell death, and both effects have been reported in studies of cells with a block in macroautophagy. To better delineate the function of macroautophagy in cell death, we contrasted the responses to death stimuli in wild-type and atg5(-/-) murine embryonic fibroblasts. We have reported that a knockout of the critical macroautophagy gene ATG5 sensitizes cells to death receptor ligand-induced death from Fas and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Death occurs by caspase-dependent apoptosis resulting from activation of the mitochondrial death pathway. In contrast, atg5(-/-) cells are more resistant to death induced by oxidative stress from menadione or UV light. This resistance was associated with an upregulation of chaperone-mediated autophagy. Inhibition of this form of autophagy sensitizes cells to death from menadione, suggesting that the compensatory upregulation of chaperone-mediated autophagy, and not the loss of macroautophagy, prevents death from menadione. These findings demonstrate that the effects of a loss of macroautophagy on the cellular death response differ depending on the mechanism of cellular injury and the compensatory changes in other forms of autophagy.     

Toll-like receptor 4-dependent contribution of the immune system to anticancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy

Conventional cancer treatments rely on radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Such treatments supposedly mediate their effects via the direct elimination of tumor cells. Here we show that the success of some protocols for anticancer therapy depends on innate and adaptive antitumor immune responses. We describe in both mice and humans a previously unrecognized pathway for the activation of tumor antigen-specific T-cell immunity that involves secretion of the high-mobility-group box 1 (HMGB1) alarmin protein by dying tumor cells and the action of HMGB1 on Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) expressed by dendritic cells (DCs). During chemotherapy or radiotherapy, DCs require signaling through TLR4 and its adaptor MyD88 for efficient processing and cross-presentation of antigen from dying tumor cells. Patients with breast cancer who carry a TLR4 loss-of-function allele relapse more quickly after radiotherapy and chemotherapy than those carrying the normal TLR4 allele. These results delineate a clinically relevant immunoadjuvant pathway triggered by tumor cell death.     

DNA alkylating therapy induces tumor regression through an HMGB1-mediated activation of innate immunity

Dysregulation of apoptosis is associated with the development of human cancer and resistance to anticancer therapy. We have previously shown in tumor xenografts that DNA alkylating agents induce sporadic cell necrosis and regression of apoptosis-deficient tumors. Sporadic tumor cell necrosis is associated with extracellular release of cellular content such as the high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein and subsequent recruitment of innate immune cells into the tumor tissue. It remained unclear whether HMGB1 and the activation of innate immunity played a role in tumor response to chemotherapy. In this study, we show that whereas DNA alkylating therapy leads to a complete tumor regression in an athymic mouse tumor xenograft model, it fails to do so in tumors deficient in HMGB1. The HMGB1-deficient tumors have an impaired ability to recruit innate immune cells including macrophages, neutrophils, and NK cells into the treated tumor tissue. Cytokine array analysis reveals that whereas DNA alkylating treatment leads to suppression of protumor cytokines such as IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13, loss of HMGB1 leads to elevated levels of these cytokines upon treatment. Suppression of innate immunity and HMGB1 using depleting Abs leads to a failure in tumor regression. Taken together, these results indicate that HMGB1 plays an essential role in activation of innate immunity and tumor clearance in response to DNA alkylating agents.     

Apoptosis and anticancer drug resistance.

Anticancer agents induce cancer cell death through apoptosis or necrosis. As anticancer agents at low and high concentrations cause apoptosis and necrosis, respectively, cancer cells may be merely injured by an anticancer agent in apoptosis, and cell death may result from an activation of the internal constituents to induce apoptosis. Therefore, an alternation of apoptotic pathway must change the efficacy of anticancer agents. As an escape of cancer cells from apoptosis seems to be closely associated with the development of anticancer resistance, this report focuses on mechanisms of apoptosis and its association with anticancer resistance. A Bax induces apoptosis mitochondria-dependently, whereas Fas can induce apoptosis mitochondria-independently. An interaction of Bax and Bcl-2 is very important to decide cell life or death, and Bcl-2 phosphorylation may control this interaction: Paclitaxel treatment induced Bcl-2 phosphorylation and typical apoptosis, whereas hyperthermia induced not Bcl-2 phosphorylation but nuclear translocation and failed to induce apoptosis. Moreover, Fas was localized in the cytoplasm of exponentially growing cells and on the cell membrane of confluent cells. We would like to emphasize that it is very important to check the localization of constituents of apoptosis in order to evaluate the susceptibility of cancer cells to apoptosis.     

Chromatin and cell death

HMGB1, a very mobile chromatin protein, leaks out from necrotic cells and signals to neighbouring cells that tissue damage has occurred. At least one receptor for extracellular HMGB1 exists, and signals to different cells to divide, migrate, activate inflammation or start an immune response. Remarkably, apoptotic chromatin binds HMGB1 irreversibly, thereby ensuring that it will not diffuse away to activate responses from neighbouring cells. Thus, dying cells use their own chromatin to signal how they have died. We argue that the nuclear events in apoptosis serve to control the molecular signals that dying cells send out.     

Apoptosis and necrosis: detection, discrimination and phagocytosis.

Three major morphologies of cell death have been described: apoptosis (type I), cell death associated with autophagy (type II) and necrosis (type III). Apoptosis and cell death associated with autophagy can be distinguished by certain biochemical events. However, necrosis is characterized mostly in negative terms by the absence of caspase activation, cytochrome c release and DNA oligonucleosomal fragmentation. A particular difficulty in defining necrosis is that in the absence of phagocytosis apoptotic cells become secondary necrotic cells with many morphological features of primary necrosis. In this review, we present a selection of techniques that can be used to identify necrosis and to discriminate it from apoptosis. These techniques rely on the following cell death parameters: (1) morphology (time-lapse and transmission electron microscopy and flow fluorocytometry); (2) cell surface markers (phosphatidylserine exposure versus membrane permeability by flow fluorocytometry); (3) intracellular markers (oligonucleosomal DNA fragmentation by flow fluorocytometry, caspase activation, Bid cleavage and cytochrome c release by western blotting); (4) release of extracellular markers in the supernatant (caspases, HMGB-1 and cytokeratin 18). Finally, we report on methods that can be used to examine interactions between dying cells and phagocytes. We illustrate a quantitative method for detecting phagocytosis of dying cells by flow fluorocytometry. We also describe a recently developed approach based on the use of fluid phase tracers and different kind of microscopy, transmission electron and fluorescence microscopy, to characterize the mechanisms used by phagocytes to internalize dying cells.     

Cell death: A dynamic response concept

Autophagy, apoptosis and necrosis have previously been described as distinct static processes that induce and execute cell death. Due to an increased use of novel techniques in mapping cellular death; techniques which allow for reporting of real-time data; the existence of “grey zones” between cell death modes and the existence of the “point of no return” within these have been revealed. This revelation demands for the integration of new concepts in describing the cellular death process. Furthermore, since the contribution of autophagy in cell death or cell survival is still poorly understood, it is important to accurately describe its function within the dynamic framework of cell death.

In this review cell death is viewed as a dynamic and integrative cellular response to ensure the highest likelihood of self preservation. Suggestions are offered for conceptualizing cell death modes and their morphological features, both individually and in relation to one another. It addresses the need for distinguishing between dying cells and dead cells so as to better locate and control the onset of cell death. Most importantly, the fundamental role of autophagy, autophagic flux, and the effects of the intracellular metabolic environment on the kinetics of the cell death modes are stressed. It also contextualizes the kinetic dimension of cell death as a process and aims to contribute towards a better understanding of autophagy as a key mechanism within this process. Understanding the dynamic nature of the cell death process and autophagy’s central role can reveal new insight for therapeutic intervention in preventing cell death.     

Autophagy in natural and therapy-driven anticancer immunosurveillance

Autophagy is primordial for the maintenance of metabolic and genetic homeostasis in all eukaryotic organisms. Owing to its cell-intrinsic effects, autophagy robustly inhibits malignant transformation, yet can support the progression of established neoplasms as well as their resistance to conventional treatments. The notion that autophagy inhibition sensitizes neoplastic cells to chemotherapy and radiation therapy rivals with the capacity of autophagy to contribute to natural and therapy-driven anticancer immunosurveillance via a multitude of mechanisms. Indeed, autophagy ensures an optimal release of immunostimulatory signals by dying cancer cells and hence boosts their capacity to initiate an immune response. Moreover, autophagy is important for the activity of several components of the immune system involved in tumor recognition and elimination, including antigen-presenting cells and CD8⁺ cytotoxic T lymphocytes. In this review, we discuss how cancer cells disable autophagy to bypass immune control and how strategies aiming to enhance autophagy can be envisaged to improve the efficacy of immunogenic cancer therapies.