Reactions between primary and secondary acceptors of photosystem II in Chlorella pyrenoidosa under anaerobic conditions as studied by chlorophyll fluorescence.

The kinetics of the fluorescence yield phi of chlorophyll a in Chlorella pyrenoidosa were studied under anaerobic conditions in the time range from 50 mus to several minutes after short (t 1/2 = 30 ns or 5 mus) saturating flashes. The fluorescence yield "in the dark" increased from phi = 1 at the beginning to phi approximately 5 in about 3 h when single flashes separated by dark intervals of about 3 min were given. After one saturating flash, phi increased to a maximum value (4-5) at 50 mus, then phi decreased to about 3 with a half time of about 10 ms and to the initial value with a half time of about 2 s. When two flashes separated by 0.2 s were given, the first phase of the decrease after the second flash occurred within 2 ms. After one flash given at high initial fluorescence yield, the 10-ms decay was followed by a 10 s increase to the initial value. After the two flashes 0.2 s apart, the rapid decay was not followed by a slow increase. These and other experiments provided additional evidence for and extend an earlier hypothesis concerning the acceptor complex of Photosystem II (Bouges-Bocquet, B. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 314, 250-256; Velthuys, B. R. and Amesz. J. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 333, 85-94): reaction center 2 contains an acceptor complex QR consisting of an electron-transferring primary acceptor molecule Q, and a secondary electron acceptor R, which can accept two electrons in succession, but transfers two electrons simultaneously to a molecule of the tertiary acceptor pool, containing plastoquinone (A). Furthermore, the kinetics indicate that 2 reactions centers of System I, excited by a short flash, cooperate directly or indirectly in oxidizing a plastohydroquinone molecule (A2-). If initially all components between photoreaction 1 and 2 are in the reduced state the following sequence of reactions occurs after a flash has oxidised A2- via System I: Q-R2- + A leads to Q-R + A2- leads to QR- + A2-. During anaerobiosis two slow reactions manifest themselves: the reduction of R (and A) within 1 s, presumably by an endogenous electron donor D1, and the reduction of Q in about 10 s when R is in the state R- and A in the state A2-. An endogenous electron donor, D2, and Q- complete in reducing the photooxidized donor complex of System II in reactions with half times of the order of 1 s.     

Inhibition of the reoxidation of the secondary electron acceptor of Photosystem II by bicarbonate depletion

In bicarbonate-depleted chloroplasts, the chlorophyll a fluorescence decayed with a halftime of about 150 ms after the third flash, and appreciably faster after the first and second flash of a series of flashes given after a dark period. After the fourth to twentieth flashes, the decay was also slow. After addition of bicarbonate, the decay was fast after all the flashes of the sequence. This indicates that the bicarbonate depletion inhibits the reoxidation of the secondary acceptor R²⁻ by the plastoquinone pool; R is the secondary electron acceptor of pigment system II, as it accepts electrons from the reduced form of the primary electron acceptor (Q⁻). This conclusion is consistent with the measurements of the DCMU (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea)-induced chlorophyll a fluorescence after a series of flashes in the presence and the absence of bicarbonate, if it is assumed that DCMU not only causes reduction of Q if added in the state QR⁻, but also if added in the state QR²⁻.     

Chlorophyll a fluorescence as a monitor of nanosecond reduction of the photooxidized primary donor P-680 of Photosystem II

1. Changes in the fluorescence yield of aerobic Chlorella vulgaris have been measured in laser flashes of 15 ns, 30 ns and 350 ns half time. The kinetics after the first flash given after a 3 min dark period could be simulated on a computer using the hypothesis that the oxidized acceptor Q and primary donor P⁺ are fluorescence quenchers, and Q⁻ is a weak quencher, and that the reduction time for P⁺ is 20–35 ns.

2. The P⁺ reduction time for at least an appreciable part of the reaction centers was found to be longer after the second and subsequent flashes. In the first 5 flashes an oscillation was observed. Under steady state conditions, with a pulse separation of 3 s, a reduction time for P⁺ of about 400 ns for all reaction centers gave the best correspondence between computed and experimental fluorescence kinetics.     

Chlorophyll a fluorescence as a monitor of nanosecond reduction of the photooxidized primary donor P-680 Of photosystem II

1. Changes in the fluorescence yield of aerobic Chlorella vulgaris have been measured in laser flashes of 15 ns, 30 ns and 350 ns half time. The kinetics after the first flash given after a 3 min dark period could be simulated on a computer using the hypothesis that the oxidized acceptor Q and primary donor P+ are fluorescence quenchers, and Q- is a weak quencher, and that the reduction time for P+ is 20-35 ns. 2. The P+ reduction time for at least an appreciable part of the reaction centers was found to be longer after the second and subsequent flashes. In the first 5 flashes an oscillation was observed. Under steady state conditions, with a pulse separation of 3 s, a reduction time for P+ of about 400 ns for all reaction centers gave the best correspondence between computed and experimental fluorescence kinetics.     

Induction kinetics of delayed light emission in spinach chloroplasts

Induction curves of the delayed light emission in spinach chloroplasts were studied by measuring the decay kinetics after each flash of light. This study differs from previous measurements of the induction curves where only the intensities at one set time after each flash of light were recorded. From the decay kinetics after each flash of light, the induction curves of the delayed light emission measured 2 ms after a flash of light were separated into two components: one component due to the last flash only and one component due to all previous flashes before the last one. On comparing the delayed light induction curves of the two components with the fluorescence induction curves in chloroplasts treated with 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea and in chloroplasts treated with hydroxylamine and 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea, the component due to the last flash only is found to be dependent on the concentration of open reaction centers and the component due to all previous flashes except the last is dependent on the concentration of closed reaction centers. This implies that the yield of the fast decaying component of the delayed light emission is dependent on the concentration of open reaction centers and the yield of the slow decaying component is dependent on the concentration of closed reaction centers.     

Enhancement and phototransduction in the ventral eye of limulus

Limulus ventral photoreceptors were voltage clamped to the resting (dark) potential and stimulated by a 20-ms test flash and a 1-s conditioning flash. At a constant level of adaptation, we measured the response to the test flash given in the dark (control) and the incremental response produced when the test flash occurred within the duration of the conditioning flash. The incremental response is defined as the response to the conditioning and test flashes minus the response to the conditioning flash given alone. When the test flash was presented within 100 ms after the onset of the conditioning flash we observed that: (a) for dim conditioning flashes the incremental response equaled the control response; (b) for intermediate intensity conditioning flashes the incremental response was greater than the control response (we refer to this as enhancement); (c) for high intensity conditioning flashes the incremental response nearly equaled the control response. Using 10-μm diam spots of illumnination, we stimulated two spatially separate regions of one photoreceptor. When the test flash and the conditioning flash were presented to the same region, enhancement was present; but when the flashes were applied to separate regions, enhancement was nearly absent. This result indicates that enhancement is localized to the region of illumination. We discuss mechanisms that may account for enhancement.     

Delayed fluorescence from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides following single flashes.

Delayed fluorescence from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides chromatophores was studied with the use of short flashes for excitation. Although the delayed fluorescence probably arises from a back-reaction between the oxidized reaction center bacteriochlorophyll complex (P+) and the reduced electron acceptor (X-), the decay of delayed fluorescence after a flash is much faster (tau1/2 approximately 120 mus) than the decay of P+X-. The rapid decay of delayed fluorescence is not due to the uptake of a proton from the solution, nor to a change in membrane potential. It correlates with small optical absorbance changes at 450 and 770 nm which could reflect a change in the state of X-. The intensity of the delayed fluorescence is 11-18-fold greater if the excitation flashes are spaced 2 s apart than it is if they are 30 s apart. The enhancement of delayed fluorescence at high flash repetition rates occurs only at redox potentials which are low enough (less than +240 mV) so that electron donors are available to reduce P+X- to PX- in part of the reaction center population. The enhancement decays between flashes as PX- is reoxidized to PX, as measured by the recovery of photochemical activity. Evidently, the reduction of P+X- to PX- leads to the storage of free energy that can be used on a subsequent flash to promote delayed fluorescence. The reduction of P+X- also is associated with a carotenoid spectral shift which decays as PX- is reoxidized to PX. Although this suggests that the free energy which supports the delayed fluorescence might be stored as a membrane potential, the ionophore gramicidin D only partially inhibits the enhancement of delayed fluorescence. With widely separated flashes, gramicidin has no effect on delayed fluorescence. At redox potentials low enough to keep X fully reduced, delayed fluorescence of the type described above does not occur, but one can detect weak luminescence which probably is due to phosphorescence of a protoporphyrin.     

Reactions between primary and secondary acceptors of Photosystem II in Chlorella Pyrenoidosa under anaerobic conditions as studied by chlorophyll a fluorescence

The kinetics of the fluorescence yield Ф of chlorophyll a in Chlorella pyrenoidosa were studied under anaerobic conditions in the time range from 50 μs to several minutes after short ($\text{t}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{= 30}\text{ns}$ or 5 μs) saturating flashes. The fluorescence yield “in the dark” increased from $\text{Ф = 1}$ at the beginning to $\text{Ф ≈ 5}$ in about 3 h when single flashes separated by dark intervals of about 3 min were given.After one saturating flash, Ф increased to a maximum value (4–5) at 50 μs, then Ф decreased to about 3 with a half time of about 10 ms and to the initial value with a half time of about 2 s. When two flashes separated by 0.2 s were given, the first phase of the decrease after the second flash occurred within 2 ms. After one flash given at high initial fluorescence yield, the 10-ms decay was followed by a 10 s increase to the initial value. After the two flashes 0.2 s apart, the rapid decay was not follewed by a slow increase.These and other experiments provided additional evidence for and extend an earlier hypothesis concerning the acceptor complex of Photosystem II (Bouges-Bocquet, B. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 314, 250–256; Velthuys, B. R. and Amesz, J. (1974) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 333, 85–94): reaction center 2 contains an acceptor complex QR consisting of an electron-transferring primary acceptor molecule Q, and a secondary electron acceptor R, which can accept two electrons in succession, but transfers two electrons simultaneously to a molecule of the tertiary acceptor pool, containing plastoquinone (A). Furthermore, the kinetics indicate that 2 reactions centers of System I, excited by a short flash, cooperate directly or indirectly in oxidizing a plastohydroquinone molecule (A^2?). If initially all components between photoreaction 1 and 2 are in the reduced state the following sequence of reactions occurs after a flash has oxidised A^2? via System I: Q^?R^2? + A → Q^?R + A^2? → QR^? + A^2?. During anaerobiosis two slow reactions manifest themselves: the reduction of R (and A) within 1 s, presumably by an endogenous electron donor D₁, and the reduction of Q in about 10 s when R is in the state R^? and A in the state A^2?. An endogenous electron donor, D₂, and Q^? compete in reducing the photooxidized donor complex of System II in reactions with half times of the order of 1 s.     

Effects of light flashes on the dark closure of Albizzia julibrissin pinnules

An electronic flash unit is used to deliver, at the beginning of a 10 min dark period and within a few ms, large doses of light to Albizzia julibrissin pinnules, to ascertain their effects on the rate of pinnule closing. In a series of alternating light flashes at 710 and 550 nm, the first 710 nm light flash significantly retards closing. A following light flash at 550 nm negates the far-red induced delay. The second 710 nm light flash delays closing less effectively than the first when given within 4 s after the green flash, but is just as effective when given after 30 s. The delay brought about by the second 710 nm light flash is again abolished by a light flash at 550 nm. A light flash at 660 nm has no effect on pinnule closing by itself and is also ineffective in reversing the far-red induced delay. A series of ten 710 nm light flashes becomes most effective in delaying closure when there is a dark interval of one min between flashes. The closing delay induced by a 710 nm light flash escapes reversal by a 550 nm light flash when the dark interval between the two flashes exceeds 2–3 min. A 750 nm light flash has no retarding effect on pinnule closing, but it becomes effective when preceded by a 660 nm or 550 nm light flash. The results obtained are suggested to be due to light absorbed by phytochrome and an unknown photoreceptor with green, far-red photoreversal property.     

Electron paramagnetic resonance Signal II in spinach chloroplasts. I. Kinetic analysis for untreated chloroplasts

An analysis of electron paramagnetic resonance Signal II in spinach chloroplasts has been made using both continuous and flashing light techniques. In order to perform the experiments we developed a method which allows us to obtain fresh, untreated chloroplasts with low dark levels of Signal II. Under these conditions a single 10-μs flash is sufficient to generate greater than 80% of the possible light-induced increase in Signal II spin concentration. The risetime for this flash-induced increase in Signal II is approx. 1 s. The close association of Signal II with Photo-system II is confirmed by the observations that red light is more effective than is far red light in generating Signal II, and that 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) does not inhibit the formation of the radical. Single flash saturation curves for the flash-induced increase in Signal I and Signal II indicate that the quantum efficiency for Signal II formation is close to that for Signal I. While one or two flashes (spaced 10 ms apart) are quite efficient in generating Signal II, three or four flashes are much less effective. However, if this spacing is decreased to 100 μs, three or four flashes become as efficient as one or two flashes. From observations of a deficiency of O₂ evolved during the initial flashes of dark-adapted chloroplasts, we conclude that the species which gives rise to Signal II is able to compete with water for oxidizing equivalents generated by Photosystem II. On the basis of these results we postulate a model in which Signal II arises from an oxidized radical which is produced by a slow electron transfer to the specific states S₂ and S₃ on the water side of Photo-system II.     

Slow fluorescence fluctuations following high light to low light or dark transitions in Chlamydomonas reinhardi.

Slow fluorescence transients in Chlamydomonas reinhardi arise after transitions from high light intensities to low light or dark conditions. Characteristics of the newly described transient phenomena include: (a) A slow biphasic decrease in fluorescence yield occurs in the dark, followed by an even slower, hour long, increase in fluorescence. (b) A similar, but faster, fluorescence yield decrease and subsequent increase also occurs during low intensity illumination periods separating high light intervals, or after transitions from high intensity to low intensity light. (c) Short (several seconds) flashes of light given during a dark period have no effect on the dark fluorescence decay, regardless of the flash frequency. Such flash regimes accurately monitor the dark decline of the M2 level by tracing the parallel decay of flash-generated P2 (Kautsky) peaks. However, flashes during a low light illumination period do influence the decay kinetics. Frequent flashes allow decay similar to that occurring in dark, but less frequent flashes inhibit the decrease in fluorescence yield.     

On the chlorophyll a fluorescence yield in chloroplasts upon excitation with twin turnover flashes (TTF) and high frequency flash trains

Chlorophyll fluorescence is routinely taken as a quantifiable measure of the redox state of the primary quinone acceptor Q_A of PSII. The variable fluorescence in thylakoids increases in a single turnover flash (STF) from its low dark level F _o towards a maximum F _m^STF when Q_A becomes reduced. We found, using twin single turnover flashes (TTFs) that the fluorescence increase induced by the first twin-partner is followed by a 20–30% increase when the second partner is applied within 20–100 μs after the first one. The amplitude of the twin response shows a period-of-four oscillation associated with the 4-step oxidation of water in the Kok cycle (S states) and originates from two different trapped states with a life time of 0.2–0.4 and 2–5 ms, respectively. The oscillation is supplemented with a binary oscillation associated with the two-electron gate mechanism at the PSII acceptor side. The F(t) response in high frequency flash trains (1–4 kHz) shows (i) in the first 3–4 flashes a transient overshoot 20–30% above the F _m^STF = 3*F _o level reached in the 1st flash with a partial decline towards a dip D in the next 2–3 ms, independent of the flash frequency, and (ii) a frequency independent rise to F _m = 5*F _o in the 3–60 ms time range. The initial overshoot is interpreted to be due to electron trapping in the S₀ fraction with Q_B-nonreducing centers and the dip to the subsequent recovery accompanying the reoxidation of the double reduced acceptor pair in these RCs after trapping. The rise after the overshoot is, in agreement with earlier findings, interpreted to indicate a photo-electrochemical control of the chlorophyll fluorescence yield of PSII. It is anticipated that the double exciton and electron trapping property of PSII is advantageous for the plant. It serves to alleviate the depression of electron transport in single reduced Q_B-nonreducing RCs, associated with electrochemically coupled proton transport, by an increased electron trapping efficiency in these centers.     

Delayed fluorescence from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides following single flashes

Delayed fluorescence from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides chromatophores was studied with the use of short flashes for excitation. Although the delayed fluorescence probably arises from a back-reaction between the oxidized reaction center bacteriochlorophyll complex (P⁺) and the reduced electron acceptor (X^?), the decay of delayed fluorescence after a flash is much faster ($\text{τ}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{≈ 120 μ}\text{s}$) than the decay of P⁺X^?. The rapid decay of delayed fluorescence is not due to the uptake of a proton from the solution, nor to a change in membrane potential. It correlates with small optical absorbance changes at 450 and 770 nm which could reflect a change in the state of X^?.The intensity of the delayed fluorescence is 11–18-fold greater if the excitation flashes are spaced 2 s apart than it is if they are 30 s apart. The enhancement of delayed fluorescence at high flash repetition rates occurs only at redox potentials which are low enough (< + 240 mV) so that electron donors are available to reduce P⁺X^? to PX^? in part of the reaction center population. The enhancement decays between flashes as PX^? is reoxidized to PX, as measured by the recovery of photochemical activity. Evidently, the reduction of P⁺X^? to PX^? leads to the storage of free energy that can be used on a subsequent flash to promote delayed fluorescence. The reduction of P⁺X^? also is associated with a carotenoid spectral shift which decays as PX^? is reoxidized to PX. Although this suggests that the free energy which supports the delayed fluorescence might be stored as a membrane potential, the ionophore gramicidin D only partially inhibits the enhancement of delayed fluorescence. With widely separated flashes, gramicidin has no effect on delayed fluorescence.At redox potentials low enough to keep X fully reduced, delayed fluorescence of the type described above does not occur, but one can detect weak luminescence which probably is due to phosphorescence of a protoporphyrin.     

Evidence for slow turnover in a fraction of Photosystem II complexes in thylakoid membranes

We used two different techniques to measure the recovery time of Photosystem II following the transfer of a single electron from P-680 to Q_A in thylakoid membranes isolated from spinach. Electron transfer in Photosystem II reaction centers was probed first by spectroscopic measurements of the electrochromic shift at 518 nm due to charge separation within the reaction centers. Using two short actinic flashes separated by a variable time interval we determined the time required after the first flash for the electrochromic shift at 518 nm to recover to the full extent on the second flash. In the second technique the redox state of Q_A at variable times after a saturating flash was monitored by measurement of the fluorescence induction in the absence of an inhibitor and in the presence of ferricyanide. The objective was to determine the time required after the actinic flash for the fluorescence induction to recover to the value observed after a 60 s dark period. Measurements were done under conditions in which (1) the electron donor for Photosystem II was water and the acceptor was the endogenous plastoquinone pool, and (2) Q₄₀₀, the Fe²⁺ near Q_A, remained reduced and therefore was not a participant in the flash-induced electron-transfer reactions. The electrochromic shift at 518 nm and the fluorescence induction revealed a prominent biphasic recovery time for Photosystem II reaction centers. The majority of the Photosystem II reaction centers recovered in less than 50 ms. However, approx. one-third of the Photosystem II reaction centers required a half-time of 2–3 s to recover. Our interpretation of these data is that Photosystem II reaction centers consist of at least two distinct populations. One population, typically 68% of the total amount of Photosystem II as determined by the electrochromic shift, has a steady-state turnover rate for the electron-transfer reaction from water to the plastoquinone pool of approx. 250 e⁻ / s, sufficiently rapid to account for measured rates of steady-state electron transport. The other population, typically 32%, has a turnover rate of approx. 0.2 e⁻ / s. Since this turnover rate is over 1000-times slower than normally active Photosystem II complexes, we conclude that the slowly turning over Photosystem II complexes are inconsequential in contributing to energy transduction. The slowly turning over Photosystem II complexes are able to transfer an electron from P-680 to Q_A rapidly, but the reoxidation of Q⁻_A is slow (t1/2 = 2 s). The fluorescence induction measurements lead us to conclude that there is significant overlap between the slowly turning over fraction of Photosystem II complexes and PS II_β reaction centers. One corollary of this conclusion is that electron transfer from P-680 to Q_A in PS II_β reaction centers results in charge separation across the membrane and gives rise to an electrochromic shift.     

On the O2 flash yields of two cyanophytes

We explored O₂ flash yield in two cyanophytes, Anacystis nidulans and Agmenellum quadruplicatum. On a rate-measuring electrode, a single flash gave a contour of O₂ evolution with a peak at about 10 ms which was maximum (100) for 680 nm background light. On 625 nm illumination the peak was smaller (62) but was followed by an increased tail of O₂ attributed to enhancement of the background. After a period of darkness, repetitive flashes (5 Hz) gave a highly damped initial oscillation in individual flash yields which finally reached steady state at 94% of the yield for 680 nm illumination. When O₂ of repetitive flashes was measured as an integrated flash yield the results was distinctive and similar to that for a continuous light 1 (680 nm). An apparent inhibition of respiration which persisted into the following dark period was taken as evidence for the Kok effect. With a concentration-measuring electrode, integrated flash yield vs. flash rate showed the same nonlinear behavior as O₂ rate vs. intensity of light 1. We draw three conclusions about the two cyanophytes. (a) The plastoquinone pool is substantially reduced in darkness. (b) Because of a high ratio of reaction centers, reaction center 1 / reaction center 2, for the two photoreactions, saturating flashes behave as light 1. (c) Because repetitive flashes are light 1, they also give a Kok effect which must be guarded against in measurements designed to count reaction centers.     

A sizeable decrease in the electric conductance of the thylakoid lumen as an early event during reaction center and Q cycle turnover

A patch-clamp method was used for measuring light-induced currents (photocurrents) in single dark-adapted Peperomia metallica chloroplasts in a 'whole-thylakoid' configuration. The multi-phasic photocurrent profiles upon a train of multiple flashes (time separation between flashes in the train 1 s) show the following characteristics: (i) photocurrent generation originates from trans-thylakoid charge transfer accompanying reaction center (RC)- and Q-cycle turnover; (ii) a 15–30% decrease in the amplitude of the RC-driven current in the second and following flashes, concomitantly with an increase in the dark recovery time of the current; and (iii) a binary oscillation of the Q-cycle current generator with high activity in even numbered flashes. The decrease in amplitude and decay rate constant of the photocurrent in a double flash after dark adaptation are interpreted in terms of a change in the electric conductance of the thylakoid lumen. Data are interpreted to indicate a light control of the thylakoid lumen via a narrowing of the planar sheet-like structures by 1 to 3 single turnover flashes. A simple method is given to determine the bioenergetic and electric parameters of the thylakoid membrane of a single chloroplast from the current profiles in a double flash. The data indicate that 1 s after a saturating flash the fraction of closed inactive centers is less than 3%.     

Kinetics of the fluorescence yield of chlorophyll a2 in spinach chloroplasts at liquid nitrogen temperature du ring and following a 16 μs flash

If, at liquid nitrogen temperature, the initial fluorescence yield of chlorophyll a₂ is high (e.g. after preillumination), a 16 μs flash produces in a few microseconds a decrease in fluorescence yield, followed by an increase, which occurs after roughly 10–20 μs, when the intensity of the flash has become negligible. It is concluded that during a flash, a quencher or quenching state T is formed, which disappears in a dark reaction in a time of the order of 10 μs. The kinetics are the same and can be interpreted in the same way as the kinetics at room temperature earlier reported by Duysens et al. (Abstr. VI. Int. Congr. on Photobiol. Bochum 1972, No. 277).If the flash is given when the initial fluorescence yield is low, then the fluorescence yield increases only markedly at the end of the flash, when the intensity has become low. Even for a strong flash, the increase is only about 20% of the maximum increase attained after a large number of flashes. This indicates that at low temperature, in contradistinction to room temperature, the reduction of the primary oxidant Q is less efficient than the formation of the quencher T. For the interpretation of the experiments it was not necessary to introduce other light-induced quenchers than T, such as the oxidized primary reductant, P⁺.     

Singlet-triplet fusion in Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides chromatophores. A probe of the organization of the photosynthetic apparatus

Chromatophores from various strains of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides were excited with laser flashes lasting about 20 ns. Fluorescence from the antenna bacteriochlorophyll of the photosynthetic apparatus was measured both during the laser flash, and during a weak Xe flash following the laser flash. Strong laser flashes caused severe quenching of the fluorescence, which could be correlated with the formation of triplet states of the antenna pigments. Triplet states of both BChl and carotenoids acted as quenchers, but bacteriochlorophyll triplets were the more effective of the two. In the double-flash experiments, the reciprocal of the fluorescence yield was proportional to the concentration of triplet quenchers remaining at the time of the second flash. This relationship indicates that singlet excitations can migrate over large domains in the antenna, rather than being restricted by boundaries separating individual reaction centers. Comparisons of chromatophores from different strains and from cells grown under different conditions showed that excitations are concentrated rapidly in the antenna complexes with the longest wavelength absorption bands (B870), and that the migration of excitations to trapping sites is relatively insensitive to the amount of antenna bacteriochlorophyll absorbing at shorter wavelengths (B800–B850). This suggests that the B870 complexes are organized in the membrane so as to interconnect many reaction centers, and that the B800–B850 complexes are arranged peripherally.     

Primary Events, Energy Transfer, and Reactions in Photosynthetic Units: 3-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU) Inhibition of System II and Light-Induced Regulatory Changes in Energy Transfer Efficiency

Oxygen pulses produced in Chlorella by a xenon flash of 15 μsec half-width were measured by means of a rapid oxygen polarograph. Under appropriate conditions the height of the pulse caused by a saturating flash was a measure of the number of active reaction centers in system II. In pigment state II, caused by illumination during several minutes with light II, the number of active centers II was the same as in pigment state I. Oxygen pulses produced by about half-saturating flashes were diminished by about 7-10% in state II, showing that the fluorescence decrease in light II was at least partly caused by a decrease in energy transfer to reaction center II. After addition of 3(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea (DCMU), only the first flash produced oxygen which gives additional support for the hypothesis that DCMU inhibits between Q and system I.     

The chlorophyll a fluorescence induction pattern in chloroplasts upon repetitive single turnover excitations: accumulation and function of QB-nonreducing centers

The increase of chlorophyll fluorescence yield in chloroplasts in a 12.5 Hz train of saturating single turnover flashes and the kinetics of fluorescence yield decay after the last flash have been analyzed. The approximate twofold increase in Fm relative to Fo, reached after 30-40 flashes, is associated with a proportional change in the slow (1-20 s) component of the multiphasic decay. This component reflects the accumulation of a sizeable fraction of QB-nonreducing centers. It is hypothesized that the generation of these centers occurs in association with proton transport across the thylakoid membrane. The data are quantitatively consistent with a model in which the fluorescence quenching of QB-nonreducing centers is reversibly released after second excitation and electron trapping on the acceptor side of Photosystem II.