How do G-protein-coupled receptors work? The case of metabotropic glutamate and GABA receptors

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest membrane proteins family in animal genomes. Being the receptors for most hormones and neurotransmitters, these proteins play a central role in intercellular communication. GPCRs can be classified into several groups based on the sequence similarity of their common structural feature: the heptahelical domain. The metabotropic receptors for the main neurotransmitters glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) belong to the class III of GPCRs, together with others receptors for Ca2+, for sweet and amino acid taste compounds and for some pheromones, as well as for odorants in fish. Besides their transmembrane heptahelical domain responsible for G-protein activation, most of class III receptors possess a large extracellular domain responsible for ligand recognition. The recent resolution of the structure of this binding domain of one of these receptors, the mGlu1 receptor, together with the recent demonstration that these receptors are dimers, revealed an original mechanism of activation for these GPCRs. Such data open new possibilities to develop drugs aimed at modulating these receptors, and raised a number of interesting questions on the activation mechanism of other GPCRs.     

The activation mechanism of class-C G-protein coupled receptors

Class-C G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a distant group among the large family of GPCRs. This class includes the receptors for the main neurotransmitters, glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and the receptors for Ca(2+), some taste and pheromone molecules, as well as some orphan receptors. Like any other GPCRs, class-C receptors possess a heptahelical domain (HD) involved in heterotrimeric G-protein activation, but most of them also have a large extracellular domain (ECD) responsible for agonist recognition and binding. In addition, it is now well accepted that these receptors are dimers, either homo or heterodimers. This complex architecture raises a number of important questions. Here we will discuss our view of how agonist binding within the large ECD triggers the necessary change of conformation, or stabilize a specific conformation, of the heptahelical domain leading to G-protein activation. How ligands acting within the heptahelical domain can change the properties of these complex macromolecules.     

Oligomerization of G-protein-coupled receptors shown by selective co-immunoprecipitation

Recent studies have shown that G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can assemble as high molecular weight homo- and hetero-oligomeric complexes. This can result in altered receptor-ligand binding, signaling, or intracellular trafficking. We have co-transfected HEK-293 cells with differentially epitope-tagged GPCRs from different subfamilies and determined whether oligomeric complexes were formed by co-immunoprecipitation and immunoblot analysis. This gave the surprising result that the 5HT(1A) receptor was capable of forming hetero-oligomers with all GPCRs tested including the 5HT(1B), 5HT(1D), EDG(1), EDG(3), GPR(26), and GABA(B2) receptors. The testing of other GPCR combinations showed similar results with hetero-oligomer formation occurring for the 5HT(1D) with the 5HT(1B) and EDG(1) receptor. Control studies showed that these complexes were present in co-transfected cells before the time of lysis and that the hetero-oligomers were comprised of GPCRs at discrete stoichiometries. These findings suggest that GPCRs have a natural tendency to form oligomers when co-transfected into cells. Future studies should therefore investigate the presence and physiological role of GPCR hetero-oligomers in cells in which they are endogenously expressed.     

A single subunit (GB2) is required for G-protein activation by the heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor.

Although G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been shown to assemble into functional homo or heteromers, the role of each protomer in G-protein activation is not known. Among the GPCRs, the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type B receptor (GABA(B)R) is the only one known so far that needs two subunits, GB1 and GB2, to function. The GB1 subunit contains the GABA binding site but is unable to activate G-proteins alone. In contrast the GB2 subunit, which does not bind GABA, has an heptahelical domain able to activate G-proteins when assembled into homodimers (Galvez, T., Duthey, B., Kniazeff, J., Blahos, J., Rovelli, G., Bettler, B., Prézeau, L., and Pin, J.-P. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 2152-2159). In the present study, we have examined the role of each subunit within the GB1-GB2 heteromer, in G-protein coupling. To that end, point mutations in the highly conserved third intracellular loop known to prevent G-protein activation of the related Ca-sensing or metabotropic glutamate receptors were introduced into GB1 and GB2. One mutation, L686P introduced in GB2 prevents the formation of a functional receptor, even though the heteromer reaches the cell surface, and even though the mutated subunit still associates with GB1 and increases GABA affinity on GB1. This was observed either in HEK293 cells where the activation of the G-protein was assessed by measurement of inositol phosphate accumulation, or in cultured neurons where the inhibition of the Ca(2+) channel current was measured. In contrast, the same mutation when introduced into GB1 does not modify the G-protein coupling properties of the heteromeric GABA(B) receptor either in HEK293 cells or in neurons. Accordingly, whereas in all GPCRs the same protein is responsible for both agonist binding and G-protein activation, these two functions are assumed by two distinct subunits in the GABA(B) heteromer: one subunit, GB1, binds the agonists whereas the other, GB2, activates the G-protein. This illustrates the importance of a single subunit for G-protein activation within a dimeric receptor.     

G protein-coupled receptor dimers: look like their parents,but act like teenagers!

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest group of cell surface receptors and an important pharmacological target. Though originally thought to act in a one receptor–one effector fashion, it is now known that these receptors are capable of oligomerization and can function as dimers or higher order oligomers in native tissue. They do not only assemble with identical receptors as homodimers, but also associate with different GPCRs to form heterodimers. We discuss here how heterodimeric GPCRs can assemble, traffic and signal in a manner distinct from their individual receptor components or from homodimers. These receptor pairs are also demonstrated to be regulated by different chaperones, Rabs and scaffolding proteins, further emphasizing their potential as unique targets. We believe in the importance of investigating each GPCR heterodimer as an individual signaling complex, as they appear to act differently from each monomer constituting them. Just as teenagers may resemble their parents and share their genetic makeup, they can still act in a manner that is entirely unique!     

Common structural requirements for heptahelical domain function in class A and class C G protein-coupled receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key players in cell communication. Several classes of such receptors have been identified. Although all GPCRs possess a heptahelical domain directly activating G proteins, important structural and sequence differences within receptors from different classes suggested distinct activation mechanisms. Here we show that highly conserved charged residues likely involved in an interaction network between transmembrane domains (TM) 3 and 6 at the cytoplasmic side of class C GPCRs are critical for activation of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type B receptor. Indeed, the loss of function resulting from the mutation of the conserved lysine residue into aspartate or glutamate in the TM3 of gamma-aminobutyric acid type B(2) can be partly rescued by mutating the conserved acidic residue of TM6 into either lysine or arginine. In addition, mutation of the conserved lysine into an acidic residue leads to a nonfunctional receptor that displays a high agonist affinity. This is reminiscent of a similar ionic network that constitutes a lock stabilizing the inactive state of many class A rhodopsin-like GPCRs. These data reveal that despite their original structure, class C GPCRs share with class A receptors at least some common structural feature controlling G protein activation.     

Use of fluorescence resonance energy transfer to analyze oligomerization of G-protein-coupled receptors expressed in yeast

Oligomerization or dimerization of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has emerged as an important theme in signal transduction. This concept has recently gained widespread interest due to the application of direct and noninvasive biophysical techniques such as fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), which have shown unequivocally that several types of GPCR can form dimers or oligomers in living cells. Current challenges are to determine which GPCRs can self-associate and/or interact with other GPCRs, to define the molecular principles that govern these specific interactions, and to establish which aspects of GPCR function require oligomerization. Although these questions ultimately must be addressed by using GPCRs expressed endogenously in their native cell types, analysis of GPCR oligomerization in heterologous expression systems will be useful to survey which GPCRs can interact, to conduct structure-function studies, and to identify peptides or small molecules that disrupt GPCR oligomerization and function. Here, we describe methods employing scanning fluorometry to detect FRET between GPCRs tagged with enhanced cyan and yellow fluorescent proteins (CFP and YFP) in living yeast cells. This approach provides a powerful means to analyze oligomerization of a variety of GPCRs that can be expressed in yeast, such as adrenergic, adenosine, C5a, muscarinic acetylcholine, vasopressin, opioid, and somatostatin receptors.     

NCD3G: a novel nine-cysteine domain in family 3 GPCRs

The NCD3G [for nine-cysteine domain of family 3 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs)] domain is a novel protein domain that is conserved in family 3 GPCRs, including metabotropic glutamate receptors, calcium-sensing receptors, pheromone receptors and taste receptors, with the exception of GABA(B) receptors. The NCD3G domain contains nine highly conserved cysteine residues. Structural predictions suggest that NCD3G might possess four beta strands and three disulfide bridges. The structural model of NCD3G highlights the conserved residues co-segregated with certain familial diseases.     

Crosstalk between GABAB and mGlu1a receptors reveals new insight into GPCR signal integration

G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) have critical functions in intercellular communication. Although a wide range of different receptors have been identified in the same cells, the mechanism by which signals are integrated remains elusive. The ability of GPCRs to form dimers or larger hetero‐oligomers is thought to generate such signal integration. We examined the molecular mechanisms responsible for the GABA_B receptor‐mediated potentiation of the mGlu receptor signalling reported in Purkinje neurons. We showed that this effect does not require a physical interaction between both receptors. Instead, it is the result of a more general mechanism in which the βγ subunits produced by the Gi‐coupled GABA_B receptor enhance the mGlu‐mediated Gq response. Most importantly, this mechanism could be generally applied to other pairs of Gi‐ and Gq‐coupled receptors and the signal integration varied depending on the time delay between activation of each receptor. Such a mechanism helps explain specific properties of cells expressing two different Gi‐ and Gq‐coupled receptors activated by a single transmitter, or properties of GPCRs naturally coupled to both types of the G protein.     

Internalization dissociates β2-adrenergic receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) self-associate as dimers or higher-order oligomers in living cells. The stability of associated GPCRs has not been extensively studied, but it is generally thought that these receptors move between the plasma membrane and intracellular compartments as intact dimers or oligomers. Here we show that β(2)-adrenergic receptors (β(2)ARs) that self-associate at the plasma membrane can dissociate during agonist-induced internalization. We use bioluminescence-resonance energy transfer (BRET) to monitor movement of β(2)ARs between subcellular compartments. BRET between β(2)ARs and plasma membrane markers decreases in response to agonist activation, while at the same time BRET between β(2)ARs and endosome markers increases. Energy transfer between β(2)ARs is decreased in a similar manner if either the donor- or acceptor-labeled receptor is mutated to impair agonist binding and internalization. These changes take place over the course of 30 minutes, persist after agonist is removed, and are sensitive to several inhibitors of arrestin- and clathrin-mediated endocytosis. The magnitude of the decrease in BRET between donor- and acceptor-labeled β(2)ARs suggests that at least half of the receptors that contribute to the BRET signal are physically segregated by internalization. These results are consistent with the possibility that β(2)ARs associate transiently with each other in the plasma membrane, or that β(2)AR dimers or oligomers are actively disrupted during internalization.     

G protein activation by serotonin type 4 receptor dimers: evidence that turning on two protomers is more efficient

The discovery that class C G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) function as obligatory dimeric entities has generated major interest in GPCR oligomerization. Oligomerization now appears to be a common feature among all GPCR classes. However, the functional significance of this process remains unclear because, in vitro, some monomeric GPCRs, such as rhodopsin and β(2)-adrenergic receptors, activate G proteins. By using wild type and mutant serotonin type 4 receptors (5-HT(4)Rs) (including a 5-HT(4)-RASSL) expressed in COS-7 cells as models of class A GPCRs, we show that activation of one protomer in a dimer was sufficient to stimulate G proteins. However, coupling efficiency was 2 times higher when both protomers were activated. Expression of combinations of 5-HT(4), in which both protomers were able to bind to agonists but only one could couple to G proteins, suggested that upon agonist occupancy, protomers did not independently couple to G proteins but rather that only one G protein was activated. Coupling of a single heterotrimeric G(s) protein to a receptor dimer was further confirmed in vitro, using the purified recombinant WT RASSL 5-HT(4)R obligatory heterodimer. These results, together with previous findings, demonstrate that, differently from class C GPCR dimers, class A GPCR dimers have pleiotropic activation mechanisms.     

An optical dynamic mass redistribution assay reveals biased signaling of dualsteric GPCR activators

Increasing attention is paid in basic science and in drug discovery to pathway selective intracellular signaling as a novel approach to achieve precise control of cell function via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). With respect to signaling, GPCRs are often promiscuous in that more than one intracellular biochemical pathway is activated upon receptor stimulation by the endogenous transmitter or by exogenous drugs. We studied signaling by a novel class of GPCR activators that were designed to bind simultaneously to the orthosteric transmitter-binding site and the allosteric site of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. An optical biosensor technique was applied to measure activation-induced dynamic mass redistribution (DMR) in CHO cells stably expressing the muscarinic receptor subtype of interest. The use of tools to modulate signaling and measuring G protein activation directly proved that DMR is a valid and comfortable approach to gain real-time insight into intracellular signaling pathway activation and to identify signaling pathway-selective drugs.     

G-protein-coupled receptors function as oligomers in vivo

Hormones, sensory stimuli, neurotransmitters and chemokines signal by activating G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) [1]. Although GPCRs are thought to function as monomers, they can form SDS-resistant dimers, and coexpression of two non-functional or related GPCRs can result in rescue of activity or modification of function [2-10]. Furthermore, dimerization of peptides corresponding to the third cytoplasmic loops of GPCRs increases their potency as activators of G proteins in vitro [11], and peptide inhibitors of dimerization diminish beta(2)-adrenergic receptor signaling [3]. Nevertheless, it is not known whether GPCRs exist as monomers or oligomers in intact cells and membranes, whether agonist binding regulates monomer-oligomer equilibrium, or whether oligomerization governs GPCR function. Here, we report that the alpha-factor receptor, a GPCR that is the product of the STE2 gene in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is oligomeric in intact cells and membranes. Coexpression of receptors tagged with the cyan or yellow fluorescent proteins (CFP or YFP) resulted in efficient fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) due to stable association rather than collisional interaction. Monomer-oligomer equilibrium was unaffected by binding of agonist, antagonist, or G protein heterotrimers. Oligomerization was further demonstrated by rescuing endocytosis-defective receptors with coexpressed wild-type receptors. Dominant-interfering receptor mutants inhibited signaling by interacting with wild-type receptors rather than by sequestering G protein heterotrimers. We suggest that oligomerization is likely to govern GPCR signaling and regulation.     

A machine learning based method for the prediction of G protein-coupled receptor-binding PDZ domain proteins

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are part of multi-protein networks called ‘receptosomes’. These GPCR interacting proteins (GIPs) in the receptosomes control the targeting, trafficking and signaling of GPCRs. PDZ domain proteins constitute the largest protein family among the GIPs, and the predominant function of the PDZ domain proteins is to assemble signaling pathway components into close proximity by recognition of the last four C-terminal amino acids of GPCRs. We present here a machine learning based approach for the identification of GPCR-binding PDZ domain proteins. In order to characterize the network of interactions between amino acid residues that contribute to the stability of the PDZ domain-ligand complex and to encode the complex into a feature vector, amino acid contact matrices and physicochemical distance matrix were constructed and adopted. This novel machine learning based method displayed high performance for the identification of PDZ domain-ligand interactions and allowed the identification of novel GPCR-PDZ domain protein interactions.     

Chimeric G proteins extend the range of insect cell-based functional assays for human G protein-coupled receptors

We previously described a functional assay for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) based on stably transformed insect cells and using the promiscuous G protein Galpha16. We now show that, compared with Galpha16, the use of chimeric Galphaq subunits with C-terminal modifications (qi5-HA, qo5-HA, or qz5-HA) significantly enhances the ability of insect cells to redirect Gi-coupled GPCRs into a Gq-type signal transduction pathway. We coexpressed human Gi-coupled GPCRs, G protein alpha subunits (either a chimeric Galphaq or Galpha16), and the calcium-sensitive reporter protein aequorin in Sf9 cells using a nonlytic protein expression system, and measured agonist-induced intracellular calcium flux using a luminometer. Three of the GPCRs (serotonin 1A, 1D, and dopamine D2) were functionally redirected into a Gq-type pathway when coexpressed with the chimeric G proteins, compared with only one (serotonin 1A) with Galpha16. We determined agonist concentration-response relationships for all three receptors, which yielded EC50 values comparable with those achieved in mammalian cell-based assay systems. However, three other Gi-coupled GPCRs (the opioid kappa1 and delta1 receptors, and serotonin 1E) were not coupled to calcium flux by either the G protein chimeras or Galpha16. Possible reasons and solutions for this result are discussed.     

The oligomeric state sets GABA(B) receptor signalling efficacy

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have key roles in cell-cell communication. Recent data suggest that these receptors can form large complexes, a possibility expected to expand the complexity of this regulatory system. Among the brain GPCRs, the heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor is one of the most abundant, being distributed in most brain regions, on either pre- or post-synaptic elements. Here, using specific antibodies labelled with time-resolved FRET compatible fluorophores, we provide evidence that the heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor can form higher-ordered oligomers in the brain, as suggested by the close proximity of the GABA(B1) subunits. Destabilizing the oligomers using a competitor or a GABA(B1) mutant revealed different G protein coupling efficiencies depending on the oligomeric state of the receptor. By examining, in heterologous system, the G protein coupling properties of such GABA(B) receptor oligomers composed of a wild-type and a non-functional mutant heterodimer, we provide evidence for a negative functional cooperativity between the GABA(B) heterodimers.     

Activation of a dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptor by intersubunit rearrangement

Although many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) can form dimers, a possible role of this phenomenon in their activation remains elusive. A recent and exciting proposal is that a dynamic intersubunit interplay may contribute to GPCR activation. Here, we examined this possibility using dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). We first developed a system to perfectly control their subunit composition and show that mGluR dimers do not form larger oligomers. We then examined an mGluR dimer containing one subunit in which the extracellular agonist-binding domain was uncoupled from the G protein-activating transmembrane domain. Despite this uncoupling in one protomer, agonist stimulation resulted in symmetric activation of either transmembrane domain in the dimer with the same efficiency. This, plus other data, can only be explained by an intersubunit rearrangement as the activation mechanism. Although well established for other types of receptors such as tyrosine kinase and guanylate cyclase receptors, this is the first clear demonstration that such a mechanism may also apply to GPCRs.     

Delineating a Ca2+ binding pocket within the venus flytrap module of the human calcium-sensing receptor

The Ca(2+)-sensing receptor (CaSR) belongs to the class III G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which include receptors for pheromones, amino acids, sweeteners, and the neurotransmitters glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). These receptors are characterized by a long extracellular amino-terminal domain called a Venus flytrap module (VFTM) containing the ligand binding pocket. To elucidate the molecular determinants implicated in Ca(2+) recognition by the CaSR VFTM, we developed a homology model of the human CaSR VFTM from the x-ray structure of the metabotropic glutamate receptor type 1 (mGluR1), and a phylogenetic analysis of 14 class III GPCR VFTMs. We identified critical amino acids delineating a Ca(2+) binding pocket predicted to be adjacent to, but distinct from, a cavity reminiscent of the binding site described for amino acids in mGluRs, GABA-B receptor, and GPRC6a. Most interestingly, these Ca(2+)-contacting residues are well conserved within class III GPCR VFTMs. Our model was validated by mutational and functional analysis, including the characterization of activating and inactivating mutations affecting a single amino acid, Glu-297, located within the proposed Ca(2+) binding pocket of the CaSR and associated with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia and familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia, respectively, genetic diseases characterized by perturbations in Ca(2+) homeostasis. Altogether, these data define a Ca(2+) binding pocket within the CaSR VFTM that may be conserved in several other class III GPCRs, thereby providing a molecular basis for extracellular Ca(2+) sensing by these receptors.     

GFP-based evaluation system of recombinant expression through the secretory pathway in insect cells and its application to the extracellular domains of class C GPCRs

Applications of the GFP-fusion technique have greatly facilitated evaluations of the amounts and qualities of sample proteins used for structural analyses. In this study, we applied the GFP-based sample evaluation to secreted protein expression by insect cells. We verified that a GFP variant, GFPuv, retains proper folding and monodispersity within all expression spaces in Sf9 cells, such as the cytosol, organelles, and even the extracellular space after secretion, and thus can serve as a proper folding reporter for recombinant proteins. We then applied the GFPuv-based system to the extracellular domains of class C G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and examined their localization, folding, and oligomerization upon insect cell expression. The extracellular domain of metabotropic glutamate receptor 1 (mGluR1) exhibited good secreted expression by Sf9 cells, and the secreted proteins formed dimer with a monodisperse hydrodynamic state favorable for crystallization, consistent with the results from previous successful structural analyses. In contrast, the extracellular domains of sweet/umami taste receptors (T1R) almost completely remained in the cell. Notably, the T1R and mGluR1 subfractions that remained in the cellular space showed polydisperse hydrodynamic states with large aggregated fractions, without forming dimers. These results indicated that the proper folding and oligomerization of the extracellular domains of the class C GPCR are achieved through the secretory pathway.     

Structural basis of M3 muscarinic receptor dimer/oligomer formation

Class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are known to form dimers and/or oligomeric arrays in vitro and in vivo. These complexes are thought to play important roles in modulating class A GPCR function. Many studies suggest that residues located on the "outer" (lipid-facing) surface of the transmembrane (TM) receptor core are critically involved in the formation of class A receptor dimers (oligomers). However, no clear consensus has emerged regarding the identity of the TM helices or TM subsegments involved in this process. To shed light on this issue, we have used the M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (M3R), a prototypic class A GPCR, as a model system. Using a comprehensive and unbiased approach, we subjected all outward-facing residues (70 amino acids total) of the TM helical bundle (TM1-7) of the M3R to systematic alanine substitution mutagenesis. We then characterized the resulting mutant receptors in radioligand binding and functional studies and determined their ability to form dimers (oligomers) in bioluminescence resonance energy transfer saturation assays. We found that M3R/M3R interactions are not dependent on the presence of one specific structural motif but involve the outer surfaces of multiple TM subsegments (TM1-5 and -7) located within the central and endofacial portions of the TM receptor core. Moreover, we demonstrated that the outward-facing surfaces of most TM helices play critical roles in proper receptor folding and/or function. Guided by the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer data, molecular modeling studies suggested the existence of multiple dimeric/oligomeric M3R arrangements, which may exist in a dynamic equilibrium. Given the high structural homology found among all class A GPCRs, our results should be of considerable general relevance.