Dissection of β‐barrel outer membrane protein assembly pathways through characterizing BamA POTRA 1 mutants of Escherichia coli

BamA of Escherichia coli is an essential component of the hetero‐oligomeric machinery that mediates β‐barrel outer membrane protein (OMP) assembly. The C‐ and N‐termini of BamA fold into trans‐membrane β‐barrel and five soluble POTRA domains respectively. Detailed characterization of BamA POTRA 1 missense and deletion mutants revealed two competing OMP assembly pathways, one of which is followed by the archetypal trimeric β‐barrel OMPs, OmpF and LamB, and is dependent on POTRA 1. Interestingly, our data suggest that BamA also requires its POTRA 1 domain for proper assembly. The second pathway is independent of POTRA 1 and is exemplified by TolC. Site‐specific cross‐linking analysis revealed that the POTRA 1 domain of BamA interacts with SurA, a periplasmic chaperone required for the assembly of OmpF and LamB, but not that of TolC and BamA. The data suggest that SurA and BamA POTRA 1 domain function in concert to assist folding and assembly of most β‐barrel OMPs except for TolC, which folds into a unique soluble α‐helical barrel and an OM‐anchored β‐barrel. The two assembly pathways finally merge at some step beyond POTRA 1 but presumably before membrane insertion, which is thought to be catalysed by the trans‐membrane β‐barrel domain of BamA.     

Crystal Structure of BamB Bound to a Periplasmic Domain Fragment of BamA,the Central Component of the β-Barrel Assembly Machine

The β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) mediates folding and insertion of β-barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs) into the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. BAM is a five-protein complex consisting of the β-barrel OMP BamA and lipoproteins BamB, -C, -D, and -E. High resolution structures of all the individual BAM subunits and a BamD-BamC complex have been determined. However, the overall complex architecture remains elusive. BamA is the central component of BAM and consists of a membrane-embedded β-barrel and a periplasmic domain with five polypeptide translocation-associated (POTRA) motifs thought to interact with the accessory lipoproteins. Here we report the crystal structure of a fusion between BamB and a POTRA3–5 fragment of BamA. Extended loops 13 and 17 protruding from one end of the BamB β-propeller contact the face of the POTRA3 β-sheet in BamA. The interface is stabilized by several hydrophobic contacts, a network of hydrogen bonds, and a cation-π interaction between BamA Tyr-255 and BamB Arg-195. Disruption of BamA-BamB binding by BamA Y255A and probing of the interface by disulfide bond cross-linking validate the physiological relevance of the observed interface. Furthermore, the structure is consistent with previously published mutagenesis studies. The periplasmic five-POTRA domain of BamA is flexible in solution due to hinge motions in the POTRA2–3 linker. Modeling BamB in complex with full-length BamA shows BamB binding at the POTRA2–3 hinge, suggesting a role in modulation of BamA flexibility and the conformational changes associated with OMP folding and insertion.     

Mutational and Topological Analysis of the Escherichia coli BamA Protein

The multi-protein β-barrel assembly machine (BAM) of Escherichia coli is responsible for the folding and insertion of β-barrel containing integral outer membrane proteins (OMPs) into the bacterial outer membrane. An essential component of this complex is the BamA protein, which binds unfolded β-barrel precursors via the five polypeptide transport-associated (POTRA) domains in its N-terminus. The C-terminus of BamA contains a β-barrel domain, which tethers BamA to the outer membrane and is also thought to be involved in OMP insertion. Here we mutagenize BamA using linker scanning mutagenesis and demonstrate that all five POTRA domains are essential for BamA protein function in our experimental system. Furthermore, we generate a homology based model of the BamA β-barrel and test our model using insertion mutagenesis, deletion analysis and immunofluorescence to identify β-strands, periplasmic turns and extracellular loops. We show that the surface-exposed loops of the BamA β-barrel are essential.     

Cross‐species chimeras reveal BamA POTRA and β‐barrel domains must be fine‐tuned for efficient OMP insertion

BAM is a conserved molecular machine, the central component of which is BamA. Orthologues of BamA are found in all Gram‐negative bacteria, chloroplasts and mitochondria where it is required for the folding and insertion of β‐barrel containing integral outer membrane proteins (OMPs) into the outer membrane. BamA binds unfolded β‐barrel precursors via the five polypeptide transport‐associated (POTRA) domains at its N‐terminus. The C‐terminus of BamA folds into a β‐barrel domain, which tethers BamA to the outer membrane and is involved in OMP insertion. BamA orthologues are found in all Gram‐negative bacteria and appear to function in a species‐specific manner. Here we investigate the nature of this species‐specificity by examining whether chimeric Escherichia coli BamA fusion proteins, carrying either the β‐barrel or POTRA domains from various BamA orthologues, can functionally replace E. coli BamA. We demonstrate that the β‐barrel domains of many BamA orthologues are functionally interchangeable. We show that defects in the orthologous POTRA domains can be rescued by compensatory mutations within the β‐barrel. These data reveal that the POTRA and barrel domains must be precisely aligned to ensure efficient OMP insertion.     

Crystal Structure of BamB from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Functional Evaluation of Its Conserved Structural Features

The assembly of β-barrel Outer Membrane Proteins (OMPs) in the outer membrane is essential for Gram-negative bacteria. The process requires the β-Barrel Assembly Machine (BAM), a multiprotein complex that, in E. coli, is composed of the OMP BamA and four lipoproteins BamB-E. Whereas BamA and BamD are essential, deletion of BamB, C or E produce membrane permeability defects. Here we present the high-resolution structure of BamB from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. This protein can complement the deletion of bamB in E. coli indicating that they are functionally equivalent. Conserved structural features include an eight-bladed β-propeller fold stabilized by tryptophan docking motifs with a central pore about 8 Å in diameter at the narrowest point. This pore distinguishes BamB from related β-propellers, such as quinoprotein dehydrogenases. However, a double mutation designed to block this pore was fully functional indicating that the opening is not essential. Two loops protruding from the bottom of the propeller are conserved and mediate binding to BamA. Conversely, an additional loop only present in E. coli BamB is not required for function. A cluster of highly conserved residues in a groove between blades 6 and 7 is crucial for proper BamB folding or biogenesis. It has been proposed that BamB may bind nascent OMPs by β-augmentation to its propeller outer strands, or recognize the aromatic residue signature at the C-terminus of OMPs. However, Isothermal Titration Calorimetry experiments and structural analysis do not support these proposals. The structural and mutagenesis analysis suggests that the main function of BamB is to bind and modulate BamA, rather than directly interact with nascent OMPs.     

Substitutions in the BamA β-barrel domain overcome the conditional lethal phenotype of a ΔbamB ΔbamE strain of Escherichia coli

BamA interacts with the BamBCDE lipoproteins, and together they constitute the essential β-barrel assembly machine (BAM) of Escherichia coli. The simultaneous absence of BamB and BamE confers a conditional lethal phenotype and a severe β-barrel outer membrane protein (OMP) biogenesis defect. Without BamB and BamE, wild-type BamA levels are significantly reduced, and the folding of the BamA β-barrel, as assessed by the heat-modifiability assay, is drastically compromised. Single-amino-acid substitutions in the β-barrel domain of BamA improve both bacterial growth and OMP biogenesis in a bamB bamE mutant and restore BamA levels close to the BamB(+) BamE(+) level. The substitutions alter BamA β-barrel folding, and folding in the mutants becomes independent of BamB and BamE. Remarkably, BamA β-barrel alterations also improve OMP biogenesis in cells lacking the major periplasmic chaperone, SurA, which, together with BamB, is thought to facilitate the transfer of partially folded OMPs to the soluble POTRA (polypeptide-transport-associated) domain of BamA. Unlike the bamB bamE mutant background, the absence of BamB or SurA does not affect BamA β-barrel folding. Thus, substitutions in the outer membrane-embedded BamA β-barrel domain overcome OMP biogenesis defects that occur at the POTRA domain of BamA in the periplasm. Based on the structure of FhaC, the altered BamA residues are predicted to lie on a highly conserved loop that folds inside the β-barrel and in regions pointing outside the β-barrel, suggesting that they influence BamA function by both direct and indirect mechanisms.     

Involvement and necessity of the Cpx regulon in the event of aberrant β‐barrel outer membrane protein assembly

The Cpx and σ^E regulons help maintain outer membrane integrity; the Cpx pathway monitors the biogenesis of cell surface structures, such as pili, while the σ^E pathway monitors the biogenesis of β‐barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs). In this study we revealed the importance of the Cpx regulon in the event of β‐barrel OMP mis‐assembly, by utilizing mutants expressing either a defective β‐barrel OMP assembly machinery (Bam) or assembly defective β‐barrel OMPs. Analysis of specific mRNAs showed that ΔcpxR bam double mutants failed to induce degP expression beyond the wild type level, despite activation of the σ^E pathway. The synthetic conditional lethal phenotype of ΔcpxR in mutant Bam or β‐barrel OMP backgrounds was reversed by wild type DegP expressed from a heterologous plasmid promoter. Consistent with the involvement of the Cpx regulon in the event of aberrant β‐barrel OMP assembly, the expression of cpxP, the archetypal member of the cpx regulon, was upregulated in defective Bam backgrounds or in cells expressing a single assembly‐defective β‐barrel OMP species. Together, these results showed that both the Cpx and σ^E regulons are required to reduce envelope stress caused by aberrant β‐barrel OMP assembly, with the Cpx regulon principally contributing by controlling degP expression.     

Role for Skp in LptD Assembly in Escherichia coli

The periplasmic chaperone Skp has long been implicated in the assembly of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) in Escherichia coli. It has been shown to interact with unfolded OMPs, and the simultaneous loss of Skp and the main periplasmic chaperone in E. coli, SurA, results in synthetic lethality. However, a Δskp mutant displays only minor OMP assembly defects, and no OMPs have been shown to require Skp for their assembly. Here, we report a role for Skp in the assembly of the essential OMP LptD. This role may be compensated for by other OMP assembly proteins; in the absence of both Skp and FkpA or Skp and BamB, LptD assembly is impaired. Overexpression of SurA does not restore LptD levels in a Δskp ΔfkpA double mutant, nor does the overexpression of Skp or FkpA restore LptD levels in the ΔsurA mutant, suggesting that Skp acts in concert with SurA to efficiently assemble LptD in E. coli. Other OMPs, including LamB, are less affected in the Δskp ΔfkpA and Δskp bamB::kan double mutants, suggesting that Skp is specifically necessary for the assembly of certain OMPs. Analysis of an OMP with a domain structure similar to that of LptD, FhuA, suggests that common structural features may determine which OMPs require Skp for their assembly.     

Borrelia burgdorferi locus BB0795 encodes a BamA orthologue required for growth and efficient localization of outer membrane proteins

The outer membrane (OM) of the pathogenic diderm spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi, contains integral β‐barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs) in addition to its numerous outer surface lipoproteins. Very few OMPs have been identified in B. burgdorferi, and the protein machinery required for OMP assembly and OM localization is currently unknown. Essential OM BamA proteins have recently been characterized in Gram‐negative bacteria that are central components of an OM β‐barrel assembly machine and are required for proper localization and insertion of bacterial OMPs. In the present study, we characterized a putative B. burgdorferi BamA orthologue encoded by open reading frame bb0795. Structural model predictions and cellular localization data indicate that the B. burgdorferi BB0795 protein contains an N‐terminal periplasmic domain and a C‐terminal, surface‐exposed β‐barrel domain. Additionally, assays with an IPTG‐regulatable bb0795 mutant revealed that BB0795 is required for B. burgdorferi growth. Furthermore, depletion of BB0795 results in decreased amounts of detectable OMPs in the B. burgdorferi OM. Interestingly, a decrease in the levels of surface‐exposed lipoproteins was also observed in the mutant OMs. Collectively, our structural, cellular localization and functional data are consistent with the characteristics of other BamA proteins, indicating that BB0795 is a B. burgdorferi BamA orthologue.     

Genetic, biochemical, and molecular characterization of the polypeptide transport-associated domain of Escherichia coli BamA

The BamA protein of Escherichia coli plays a central role in the assembly of β-barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs). The C-terminal domain of BamA folds into an integral outer membrane β-barrel, and the N terminus forms a periplasmic polypeptide transport-associated (POTRA) domain for OMP reception and assembly. We show here that BamA misfolding, caused by the deletion of the R44 residue from the α2 helix of the POTRA 1 domain (ΔR44), can be overcome by the insertion of alanine 2 residues upstream or downstream from the ΔR44 site. This highlights the importance of the side chain orientation of the α2 helix residues for normal POTRA 1 activity. The ΔR44-mediated POTRA folding defect and its correction by the insertion of alanine were further demonstrated by using a construct expressing just the soluble POTRA domain. Besides misfolding, the expression of BamA(ΔR44) from a low-copy-number plasmid confers a severe drug hypersensitivity phenotype. A spontaneous drug-resistant revertant of BamA(ΔR44) was found to carry an A18S substitution in the α1 helix of POTRA 1. In the BamA(ΔR44, A18S) background, OMP biogenesis improved dramatically, and this correlated with improved BamA folding, BamA-SurA interactions, and LptD (lipopolysaccharide transporter) biogenesis. The presence of the A18S substitution in the wild-type BamA protein did not affect the activity of BamA. The discovery of the A18S substitution in the α1 helix of the POTRA 1 domain as a suppressor of the folding defect caused by ΔR44 underscores the importance of the helix 1 and 2 regions in BamA folding.     

The crystal structure of BamB suggests interactions with BamA and its role within the BAM complex

Escherichia coli BamB is the largest of four lipoproteins in the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) complex. It interacts with the periplasmic domain of BamA, an integral outer membrane protein (OMP) essential for OMP biogenesis. Although BamB is not essential, it serves an important function in the BAM complex, significantly increasing the folding efficiency of some OMPs in vivo and in vitro. To learn more about the BAM complex, we solved structures of BamB in three different crystal forms. BamB crystallized in space groups P2₁3, I222, and P2₁2₁2₁, with one molecule per asymmetric unit in each case. Crystals from the space group I222 diffracted to 1. 65-Å resolution. BamB forms an eight-bladed β-propeller with a central pore and is shaped like a doughnut. A DALI search revealed that BamB shares structural homology to several eukaryotic proteins containing WD40 repeat domains, which commonly have β-propeller folds and often serve as scaffolding proteins within larger multi-protein complexes that carry out signal transduction, cell division, and chemotaxis. Using mutagenesis data from previous studies, we docked BamB onto a BamA structural model and assessed known and possible interactions between these two proteins. Our data suggest that BamB serves as a scaffolding protein within the BAM complex by optimally orienting the flexible periplasmic domain of BamA for interaction with other BAM components and chaperones. This may facilitate integration of newly synthesized OMPs into the outer membrane.     

The Escherichia coli outer membrane protein OmpA acquires secondary structure prior to its integration into the membrane

Almost all proteins that reside in the outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria contain a membrane-spanning segment that folds into a unique β barrel structure and inserts into the membrane by an unknown mechanism. To obtain further insight into outer membrane protein (OMP) biogenesis, we revisited the surprising observation reported over 20 years ago that the Escherichia coli OmpA β barrel can be assembled into a native structure in vivo when it is expressed as two noncovalently linked fragments. Here, we show that disulfide bonds between β strand 4 in the N-terminal fragment and β strand 5 in the C-terminal fragment can form in the periplasmic space and greatly increase the efficiency of assembly of “split” OmpA, but only if the cysteine residues are engineered in perfect register (i.e., they are aligned in the fully folded β barrel). In contrast, we observed only weak disulfide bonding between β strand 1 in the N-terminal fragment and β strand 8 in the C-terminal fragment that would form a closed or circularly permutated β barrel. Our results not only demonstrate that β barrels begin to fold into a β-sheet-like structure before they are integrated into the OM but also help to discriminate among the different models of OMP biogenesis that have been proposed.     

Species-Specificity of the BamA Component of the Bacterial Outer Membrane Protein-Assembly Machinery

The BamA protein is the key component of the Bam complex, the assembly machinery for outer membrane proteins (OMP) in gram-negative bacteria. We previously demonstrated that BamA recognizes its OMP substrates in a species-specific manner in vitro. In this work, we further studied species specificity in vivo by testing the functioning of BamA homologs of the proteobacteria Neisseria meningitidis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Bordetella pertussis, Burkholderia mallei, and Escherichia coli in E. coli and in N. meningitidis. We found that no BamA functioned in another species than the authentic one, except for N. gonorrhoeae BamA, which fully complemented a N. meningitidis bamA mutant. E. coli BamA was not assembled into the N. meningitidis outer membrane. In contrast, the N. meningitidis BamA protein was assembled into the outer membrane of E. coli to a significant extent and also associated with BamD, an essential accessory lipoprotein of the Bam complex.Various chimeras comprising swapped N-terminal periplasmic and C-terminal membrane-embedded domains of N. meningitidis and E. coli BamA proteins were also not functional in either host, although some of them were inserted in the OM suggesting that the two domains of BamA need to be compatible in order to function. Furthermore, conformational analysis of chimeric proteins provided evidence for a 16-stranded β-barrel conformation of the membrane-embedded domain of BamA.     

Involvement of Neisseria meningitidis Lipoprotein GNA2091 in the Assembly of a Subset of Outer Membrane Proteins

GNA2091 of Neisseria meningitidis is a lipoprotein of unknown function that is included in the novel 4CMenB vaccine. Here, we investigated the biological function and the subcellular localization of the protein. We demonstrate that GNA2091 functions in the assembly of outer membrane proteins (OMPs) because its absence resulted in the accumulation of misassembled OMPs. Cell fractionation and protease accessibility experiments showed that the protein is localized at the periplasmic side of the outer membrane. Pulldown experiments revealed that it is not stably associated with the β-barrel assembly machinery, the previously identified complex for OMP assembly. Thus, GNA2091 constitutes a novel outer membrane-based lipoprotein required for OMP assembly. Furthermore, its location at the inner side of the outer membrane indicates that protective immunity elicited by this antigen cannot be due to bactericidal or opsonic activity of antibodies.     

Modeling intermediates of BamA folding an outer membrane protein

BamA, the core component of the β-barrel assembly machinery complex, is an integral outer-membrane protein (OMP) in Gram-negative bacteria that catalyzes the folding and insertion of OMPs. A key feature of BamA relevant to its function is a lateral gate between its first and last β-strands. Opening of this lateral gate is one of the first steps in the asymmetric-hybrid-barrel model of BamA function. In this study, multiple hybrid-barrel folding intermediates of BamA and a substrate OMP, EspP, were constructed and simulated to better understand the model’s physical consequences. The hybrid-barrel intermediates consisted of the BamA β-barrel and its POTRA5 domain and either one, two, three, four, five, or six β-hairpins of EspP. The simulation results support an asymmetric-hybrid-barrel model in which the BamA N-terminal β-strand forms stronger interactions with the substrate OMP than the C-terminal β-strand. A consistent “B”-shaped conformation of the final folding intermediate was observed, and the shape of the substrate β-barrel within the hybrid matched the shape of the fully folded substrate. Upon further investigation, inward-facing glycines were found at sharp bends within the hybrid and fully folded β-barrels. Together, the data suggest an influence of sequence on shape of the substrate barrel throughout the OMP folding process and of the fully folded OMP.     

Deciphering the Roles of BamB and Its Interaction with BamA in Outer Membrane Biogenesis,T3SS Expression and Virulence in Salmonella

The folding and insertion of β-barrel proteins in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria is mediated by the BAM complex, which is composed of the outer membrane protein BamA and four lipoproteins BamB to BamE. In Escherichia coli and/or Salmonella, the BamB lipoprotein is involved in (i) β-barrel protein assembly in the outer membrane, (ii) outer membrane permeability to antibiotics, (iii) the control of the expression of T3SS which are major virulence factors and (iv) the virulence of Salmonella. In E. coli, this protein has been shown to interact directly with BamA. In this study, we investigated the structure-function relationship of BamB in order to assess whether the roles of BamB in these phenotypes were inter-related and whether they require the interaction of BamB with BamA. For this purpose, recombinant plasmids harbouring point mutations in bamB were introduced in a ΔSalmonella bamB mutant. We demonstrated that the residues L173, L175 and R176 are crucial for all the roles of BamB and for the interaction of BamB with BamA. Moreover, the results obtained with a D229A BamB variant, which is unable to immunoprecipitate BamA, suggest that the interaction of BamB with BamA is not absolutely necessary for BamB function in outer-membrane protein assembly, T3SS expression and virulence. Finally, we showed that the virulence defect of the ΔbamB mutant is not related to its increased susceptibility to antimicrobials, as the D227A BamB variant fully restored the virulence of the mutant while having a similar antibiotic susceptibility to the ΔbamB strain. Overall, this study demonstrates that the different roles of BamB are not all inter-related and that L173, L175 and R176 amino-acids are privileged sites for the design of BamB inhibitors that could be used as alternative therapeutics to antibiotics, at least against Salmonella.     

BamE structure: the assembly of β-barrel proteins in the outer membranes of bacteria and mitochondria

A study recently published in EMBO reports solves the solution structure of E. coli BamE, thus providing the basis for a better understanding of the mechanism of β-barrel assembly in bacterial and mitochondrial outer membranes.EMBO Rep (2011) advance online publication. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.202β-barrel membrane proteins are found exclusively in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and the outer membranes of eukaryotic organelles of prokaryotic origin, mitochondria and chloroplasts. In contrast to the inner membrane, the bacterial outer membrane is an asymmetrical bilayer that consists mainly of lipopolysaccharides in the outer leaflet and phospholipids in the inner leaflet. Bacterial β-barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs) mediate many cellular functions, for example, passive or selective diffusion of small molecules through the β-barrel pores across the outer membrane. By contrast, only a few mitochondrial β-barrel outer membrane proteins (MBOMPs) have been identified so far. The central machineries that mediate insertion and assembly of OMPs/MBOMPs are the β-barrel assembly machine (BAM) complex in the bacterial outer membrane and the topogenesis of outer-membrane β-barrel proteins (TOB)/sorting and assembly machinery (SAM) complex in the mitochondrial outer membrane (Knowles et al, 2009; Endo & Yamano, 2010; Stroud et al, 2010; Fig 1). However, the molecular mechanisms of β-barrel protein topogenesis in bacterial and mitochondrial outer membranes remain poorly understood.Open in a separate windowFigure 1β-barrel protein assembly in bacterial and mitochondrial outer membranes. (A) Bacteria. Ribbon models of the structures of the Sec complex, SurA, BamA (Clantin et al, 2007; Kim et al, 2007), BamE and OMP. The upper and lower inserts show the surface of BamE (residues 20–108; viewed after approximately 90° rotation of the ribbon model around the horizontal axis toward the reader). Residues important for BamD binding are shown in red and residues with NMR signals that were perturbed by BamD binding are shown in yellow. The residue (Phe 74) important for PG binding is shown in red and the residues with NMR signals that were perturbed by PG binding are shown in yellow. (B) Mitochondria. Ribbon models were drawn for the structures of small Tim and MBOMP. IM, inner membrane; IMS, intermembrane space; MBOMP, mitochondrial β-barrel outer membrane protein; OM, outer membrane; OMP, outer membrane protein; PG, phosphatidylglycerol; POTRA, polypeptide transport-associated domain.Bacterial OMPs are synthesized in the cytosol as precursor proteins with an amino-terminal signal sequence that guides the proteins to the Sec machinery for crossing the inner membrane and is cleaved off in the periplasm. Periplasmic chaperones then escort OMPs through the aqueous periplasmic space in a partly unfolded state. On reaching the outer membrane, OMPs assemble into a β-barrel structure and insert into the outer membrane with the help of the BAM complex. The bacterial OMP insertion pathway can be compared to the assembly pathway of MBOMPs from the mitochondrial intermembrane space into the outer membrane. MBOMPs are synthesized in the cytosol and imported into the intermembrane space by the outer membrane translocator TOM40. The subsequent chaperone-mediated escort across the intermembrane space and insertion into the outer membrane by the TOB complex is similar to the OMP assembly process. Notably, the BAM and TOB complexes share the homologous β-barrel proteins BamA and Tob55/Sam50, respectively, as the central components of their insertion machineries. The BAM complex in Escherichia coli consists of BamA (YaeT/Omp85) and four accessory lipoproteins: BamB (YfgL), BamC (NlpB), BamD (YfiO) and BamE (SmpA). BamA and BamD are essential for cell growth, yet deletion of dispensable BamB, BamC or BamE leads to outer membrane defects manifested in hypersensitivity to antibiotics. Although BamAB and BamCDE can form distinct subcomplexes, they become functional only after formation of the entire BAM complex with all five subunits (Hagan et al, 2010).In this issue of EMBO reports, Knowles et al (2011) solve the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) solution structure of E. coli BamE, which sheds light on the roles of one of the Bam subunits in β-barrel protein assembly. The structure of BamE consists of a three-stranded antiparallel β-sheet packed against a pair of α-helices (Fig 1).As the ΔbamE mutant cannot grow in the presence of vancomycin, the authors identify functionally important residues of BamE by testing the effects of amino-acid substitutions in BamE on its inability to complement the growth defects of ΔbamE, without destabilizing BamE itself. Many of the identified residues are conserved among BamE proteins from different organisms and map to a single surface area on BamE. Interestingly, NMR signals of the residues around this region are sensitive to the addition of micelles containing the lipid phosphatidylglycerol, but not phosphatidylethanolamine or cardiolipin. In parallel, the authors analyse perturbation of the NMR spectra of BamE after the addition of purified BamB, C and D proteins. Only BamD affects the NMR spectra of BamE, and the BamD interacting region of BamE is found to overlap partly with the residues involved in phosphatidylglycerol binding. As the addition of BamD and phosphatidylglycerol have different effects on the NMR spectra of BamE, the binding of BamD and phosphatidylglycerol to BamE seem to take place simultaneously. What is the biological relevance of the observed interactions of BamE with both BamD and phosphatidylglycerol? As phosphatidylglycerol was found to help the insertion of OMPs into lipid liposomes (Patel et al, 2009), BamE might recruit the BAM complex through BamD to phosphatidylglycerol-rich regions in the outer membrane, or might directly recruit phosphatidylglycerol to form assembly points for OMP insertion and folding.What are the roles of other subunits of the BAM complex in β-barrel protein assembly? The essential subunit of the E. coli BAM complex BamA consists of two domains: the N-terminal polypeptide transport-associated (POTRA) domain repeat in the periplasm and the carboxy-terminal β-barrel domain, embedded in the outer membrane. The number of POTRA domains ranges from one to five in BamA homologues from different organisms. Of these POTRA domains, the one nearest to the C-terminal that is most connected to the β-barrel domain is essential for cell viability and its deletion leads to disassembly of the BAM complex (Kim et al, 2007). Structural studies of the E. coli BamA POTRA domains suggest that each POTRA domain has a common fold, whereas conformational rigidity might differ between inter-domain linkers (Gatzeva-Topalova et al, 2010; Fig 1). As individual POTRA domains have some affinity for unfolded substrate proteins, the periplasmic tandem POTRA repeat probably provides several substrate binding sites that slide the substrate progressively towards the BamA β-barrel domain. The β-barrel domain of BamA probably functions as a scaffold to facilitate the formation of β-strands, possibly through β-augmentation and subsequent spontaneous membrane insertion of the β-barrel. Yet, it is not clear whether this cradle for β-strand formation is provided by the pore formed within the monomer or oligomeric forms of the BamA β-barrel domain. Alternatively, membrane insertion and folding of OMPs might take place at the interface between BamA and the outer membrane lipid bilayer.How much of the β-barrel assembly process is conserved during the evolution of mitochondria from Gram-negative bacteria? Although the central subunits BamA and Tob55 of the BAM and TOB complexes are conserved, other subunits of these complexes are unrelated to each other. The POTRA domains of BamA are essential for recognition and assembly of bacterial OMPs, whereas that of Tob55 is dispensable for MBOMP assembly in the mitochondrial outer membrane. Nevertheless, the mitochondrial TOB complex facilitates assembly of bacterial OMPs at low efficiency (Walther et al, 2009) and, in turn, the bacterial BAM complex can mediate assembly of mitochondrial porin. Therefore, the basic mechanism of β-barrel assembly in the outer membranes of bacteria and mitochondria seems to be conserved. High-resolution structures of each component of the BAM and TOB complexes—including that of BamE in this study—will thus provide the basis for a better understanding of the mechanism of β-barrel assembly in evolutionarily related bacterial and mitochondrial outer membranes.     

A plant reovirus hijacks the DNAJB12–Hsc70 chaperone complex to promote viral spread in its planthopper vector

Many viruses usurp the functions of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) for virus‐encoded membrane proteins proper functional folding or assembly to promote virus spread. Southern rice black‐streaked dwarf virus (SRBSDV), a plant reovirus, exploits virus‐containing tubules composed of nonstructural membrane protein P7‐1 to spread in its planthopper vector Sogatella furcifera. Here, we report that two factors of the ER‐associated degradation (ERAD) machinery, the ER chaperone DNAJB12 and its cytosolic co‐chaperone Hsc70, are activated by SRBSDV to facilitate ER‐to‐cytosol export of P7‐1 tubules in S. furcifera. Both P7‐1 of SRBSDV and Hsc70 directly bind to the J‐domain of DNAJB12. DNAJB12 overexpression induces ER retention of P7‐1, but Hsc70 overexpression promotes the transport of P7‐1 from the ER to the cytosol to initiate tubule assembly. Thus, P7‐1 is initially retained in the ER by interaction with DNAJB12 and then delivered to Hsc70. Furthermore, the inhibitors of the ATPase activity of Hsc70 reduce P7‐1 tubule assembly, suggesting that the proper folding and assembly of P7‐1 tubules is dependent on the ATPase activity of Hsc70. The DNAJB12–Hsc70 chaperone complex is recruited to P7‐1 tubules in virus‐infected midgut epithelial cells in S. furcifera. The knockdown of DNAJB12 or Hsc70 strongly inhibits P7‐1 tubule assembly in vivo, finally suppressing effective viral spread in S. furcifera. Taken together, our results indicate that the DNAJB12–Hsc70 chaperone complex in the ERAD machinery facilitates the ER‐to‐cytosol transport of P7‐1 for proper assembly of tubules, enabling viral spread in insect vectors in a manner dependent on ATPase activity of Hsc70.     

The β-Barrel Outer Membrane Protein Assembly Complex of Neisseria meningitidis

The evolutionarily conserved protein Omp85 is required for outer membrane protein (OMP) assembly in gram-negative bacteria and in mitochondria. Its Escherichia coli homolog, designated BamA, functions with four accessory lipoproteins, BamB, BamC, BamD, and BamE, together forming the β-barrel assembly machinery (Bam). Here, we addressed the composition of this machinery and the function of its components in Neisseria meningitidis, a model organism for outer membrane biogenesis studies. Analysis of genome sequences revealed homologs of BamC, BamD (previously described as ComL), and BamE and a second BamE homolog, Mlp. No homolog of BamB was found. As in E. coli, ComL/BamD appeared essential for viability and for OMP assembly, and it could not be replaced by its E. coli homolog. BamE was not essential but was found to contribute to the efficiency of OMP assembly and to the maintenance of OM integrity. A bamC mutant showed only marginal OMP assembly defects, but the impossibility of creating a bamC bamE double mutant further indicated the function of BamC in OMP assembly. An mlp mutant was unaffected in OMP assembly. The results of copurification assays demonstrated the association of BamC, ComL, and BamE with Omp85. Semi-native gel electrophoresis identified the RmpM protein as an additional component of the Omp85 complex, which was confirmed in copurification assays. RmpM was not required for OMP folding but stabilized OMP complexes. Thus, the Bam complex in N. meningitidis consists of Omp85/BamA plus RmpM, BamC, ComL/BamD, and BamE, of which ComL/BamD and BamE appear to be the most important accessory components for OMP assembly.Membrane-embedded β-barrel proteins are found in the outer membranes (OMs) of gram-negative bacteria, mitochondria, and chloroplasts. Only in recent years have cellular components required for the assembly and insertion of these OM proteins (OMPs) into the OM been identified. Omp85, which was first characterized in Neisseria meningitidis, is the key protein of the OMP assembly machinery (41). The function of Omp85 has been preserved during evolution, not only in gram-negative bacteria (8, 37, 44, 46) but also in mitochondria, where an Omp85 homolog, also known as Tob55 or Sam50, was shown to mediate the assembly of β-barrel proteins into the OM (15, 23, 27). Accordingly, bacterial OMPs are still recognized by the eukaryotic assembly machinery: when expressed in yeast, bacterial OMPs were found to be assembled into the mitochondrial OM in a Tob55-dependent manner (43). Omp85 in Escherichia coli, which was recently renamed BamA, for β-barrel assembly machinery (Bam) component A, is associated with at least four lipoproteins: BamB (formerly known as YfgL), BamC (NlpB), BamD (YfiO), and BamE (SmpA) (32, 46). In E. coli, BamB, BamC, and BamE are not essential, but the phenotypes of deletion mutants suggest that these proteins contribute to the efficiency of OMP assembly. Like BamA, BamD is an essential protein in E. coli (24, 26), involved in OMP assembly (24). These lipoproteins are evolutionarily less well conserved; the mitochondrial Tob55 protein is associated with two accessory proteins, but they do not show any sequence similarity with the lipoproteins of the E. coli Bam complex (14).Besides E. coli, N. meningitidis is one of the major bacterial model organisms for studies of OM assembly. As mentioned above, it was the first organism in which the function of Omp85 was identified (41), and also, the role of an integral OMP, designated LptD (formerly Imp or OstA), in the transport of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to the cell surface was first established in N. meningitidis (3). With regard to OM biogenesis, N. meningitidis has several features that distinguish it from E. coli. For example, in contrast to E. coli (13), N. meningitidis mutants defective in LPS synthesis or transport are viable (3, 34), and OMPs are assembled perfectly well in such mutants (33). Furthermore, in OMP assembly mutants of E. coli, the periplasmic accumulation of unassembled OMPs is limited due to the induction of the σ^E extracytoplasmic stress response, which results in the degradation of unfolded OMPs (30) and the inhibition of their synthesis by small regulatory RNAs (20). In contrast, in N. meningitidis, most of the components involved in this response are absent (4), and unassembled OMPs continue to accumulate as periplasmic aggregates when OMP assembly is halted (41). However, the composition of the Bam complex and the role of accessory components in OMP assembly have not so far been studied in this organism. Therefore, to further understand the OMP assembly process in N. meningitidis, we have now analyzed the composition of the Bam complex and addressed the roles of the different components.     

Crystal structure of BamD: an essential component of the β-Barrel assembly machinery of gram-negative bacteria

Folding and insertion of integral β-barrel proteins in the outer membrane (OM) is an essential process for Gram-negative bacteria that requires the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM). Efficient OM protein (OMP) folding and insertion appears to require a consensus C-terminal signal in OMPs characterized by terminal F or W residues. The BAM complex is embedded in the OM and, in Escherichia coli, consists of the β-barrel BamA and four lipoproteins BamBCDE. BamA and BamD are broadly distributed across all species of Gram-negative bacteria, whereas the other components are present in only a subset of species. BamA and BamD are also essential for viability, suggesting that these two proteins constitute the functional core of the bacterial BAM complex. Here, we present the crystal structure of BamD from the thermophilic bacteria Rhodothermus marinus refined to 2.15 Å resolution. The protein contains five tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs) organized into two offset tandems, each capped by a terminal helix. The N-terminal domain contains three TPRs and displays remarkable structural similarity with proteins that recognize targeting signals in extended conformations. The C-terminal domain harbors the remaining two TPRs and previously described mutations that impair binding to other BAM components map to this domain. Therefore, the structure suggests a model where the C-terminal domain provides a scaffold for interaction with BAM components, while the N-terminal domain participates in interaction with the substrates, either recognizing the C-terminal consensus sequence or binding unfolded OMP intermediates.